because : http://www.livescience.com/technology/050201_cell_danger.html "cell phone distraction causes 2,600 deaths and 330,000 injuries in the United States every year, according to the journal's publisher, the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society."
sorry, when you're fluently trilingual, you tend to mix the rules of the different languages, especially if your mothertongue DOES use an apostrophe at that specific place.
That's because : YOU'RE doing it WRONG. Good regulation should create a level playing field for as many people and businesses as possible. states and countries should NOT compete with each other, but because businesses have become so large that they have states and countries in a strangehold, businesses can pitch them against each other, which is only good for the upper class/big bucks, not for people and planet.
I have only CFL's in my house. not one of them has broken since i moved in in june last year. 3 of those i brought with me from my previous house, which i have i used there for nearly 5 years.
The link you cited shows that the total CO2 footprint cannot be said to be zero.
indeed. but solar panels, and especially windturbines have a MUCH MUCH better CO2-footprint than nukes. I NEVER EVER EVER EVER ever ever would suggest coal power, nukes are 10 times better than those, but solar and wind is even 10 times better than THOSE.
Every single argument(*) on that site is an argument for increasing nuclear power generation so we can use nuke's to replace the non-nuke powered steps.
Yes, let's magically produce uranium,plutonium,concrete,steel,copper out of thin air then, shall we ? and let the waste products used also vanish into thin air...
so you're saying that we only need to compare costs and wastes of the completed power plant ? If I use that same reasonning for wind turbines and solar panels, I can conclude that those deliver completely FREE energy...
I've been proven wrong. well, that's what you get when only the shouting matches wind up on the tube. [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS8jOlY6U6o [2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtwjrXhB1gY&feature=related And my favorite : [3]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSl0EcEa99E (that actually only proves O'reilly as a fascist(from wikipedia on fascism : "Fascist governments forbid and suppress criticism and opposition to the government".)
Slashdot Mirror
but I cannot hold a phone to my ear.
because : http://www.livescience.com/technology/050201_cell_danger.html "cell phone distraction causes 2,600 deaths and 330,000 injuries in the United States every year, according to the journal's publisher, the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society."
sorry, when you're fluently trilingual, you tend to mix the rules of the different languages, especially if your mothertongue DOES use an apostrophe at that specific place.
big government the bum's rush to the garbage tip.
given that of the 100 biggest economies, 51 are corporations, what about big corporations ?
f all photographs are labeled, then the label becomes meaningless.
not necessarily, i think there are enough people around not knowing that photo's can be tampered with.
That's because : YOU'RE doing it WRONG. Good regulation should create a level playing field for as many people and businesses as possible. states and countries should NOT compete with each other, but because businesses have become so large that they have states and countries in a strangehold, businesses can pitch them against each other, which is only good for the upper class/big bucks, not for people and planet.
I rather rely on government regulation than the 'self-regulation'-scam the industries are brainwashing america with for the last 3 decades.
I ain't worried by the telcos. they're not really affected by what traffic passes their lines. it's the RIAA and the likes I'm worried about.
that's also how ancient circuit breakers worked (up until people started using wires to bypass the breakers)
lightning is not that common.
It's unwritten law that you don't take the lightbulbs when you move house;
also the ones in standing lamps ? or bureau lamps ?
accidents, overvoltage or simply moving out of the apartment
accidents : LED's are VERY durable.
overvoltage : do you live in a third world country ?
moving out : take them with you
19 years
more efficient : maybe OLED's, and they're not market-ready. And 2 years from now means I allready have my investment + 6$ back.
I have only CFL's in my house. not one of them has broken since i moved in in june last year. 3 of those i brought with me from my previous house, which i have i used there for nearly 5 years.
$40 still seems pretty pricey for a light bulb,
one that saves 23$ a year, which lasts a whopping 19 years ? yup, some people are stupid.
Mine never crashes. and a good firewall + antivirus should cover *nearly* every contingency. (AS IF Xp or vista/win7 is perfect HAH!)
W2K did everything I needed.
it still does.
solar, wind and wave can't maintain a consistent load 24/7
wind CAN: geographic dispersion can completely elliminate that drawback.
apparantly, you won't accept the fact that nuclear power produces any waste. I'll ignore you.
The link you cited shows that the total CO2 footprint cannot be said to be zero.
indeed. but solar panels, and especially windturbines have a MUCH MUCH better CO2-footprint than nukes. I NEVER EVER EVER EVER ever ever would suggest coal power, nukes are 10 times better than those, but solar and wind is even 10 times better than THOSE.
Every single argument(*) on that site is an argument for increasing nuclear power generation so we can use nuke's to replace the non-nuke powered steps.
Yes, let's magically produce uranium,plutonium,concrete,steel,copper out of thin air then, shall we ? and let the waste products used also vanish into thin air ...
Nuclear plants themselves emit NO gases
so you're saying that we only need to compare costs and wastes of the completed power plant ? ...
If I use that same reasonning for wind turbines and solar panels, I can conclude that those deliver completely FREE energy
nuclear plants that emit no CO2
That's just plain WRONG see here : http://www.peakoil.org.au/news/index.php?does_nuclear_energy_produce_no_co2.htm
bring back the HD to the same state it was before
isn't that the only way to prevent clutter on your HD, wouldn't this be the ONLY way to prevent a necessary 'format' in the long run ?
they just plain delete the folder.
in my book, that's how it SHOULD be ...
I've been proven wrong. well, that's what you get when only the shouting matches wind up on the tube. [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS8jOlY6U6o [2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtwjrXhB1gY&feature=related And my favorite : [3]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSl0EcEa99E (that actually only proves O'reilly as a fascist(from wikipedia on fascism : "Fascist governments forbid and suppress criticism and opposition to the government".)
Olbermann he is ONE OF THE VERY FEW that attacks BOTH sides. (can you produce 3 videolinks of FOX news or glen beck criticizing bush ?)