Creating games is usually a whole lot more complicated and requires a lot more knowledge and experience than the average business application
I would prefer to say different rather than harder. Creating business apps also requires some skills that are not found in games, for example : disentangling the business rules, interacting with users, making sense of the 20 year old system which consists of cobol-programs, jcl,... all written by 20 different people which aren't there anymore, and you're stuck with a database which is a melting pot of 3 older systems...
no, i care for the environment, and what i hear among like-minded people: we need an electric car that's PRACTICAL and SIMPLE, like jetta wagon/golf wagon, and if that means we only get 150 miles range, so be it. most people i know that care for the environment don't be smug about it. the ones that are smug about it, don't really care much for the environment.
cars that look like the prius don't help this. So if people can see electric cars with real performance that would even surpass the petrol counterpart it should make people more likely to change.
Just a tought, but maybe the major car makers WANT this? It seems to me that they produce ugly,slow cars that won't appeal to the masses with a reason. After all, electric cars need much, MUCH less maintenance and spare parts than a petrol car... Lets hope the smaller manufacturers see the gap in the market.
If you apply this process to make homegrown hydrogen, this would be an advantage; in current conditions, we have to transport our petrol, natural gas, electricty to our houses.
They can't ensure 100% safety. I wouldn't want to be in the neighbourhood when a rocket with plutonium explodes. And there is nowhere enough nuclear material to provide for the whole world.
i know that. let's go to your "there are some who would attack you either way"... who is behaving like that?... IRAQ... And all the while saying that they're the good guys...
jeezes... use your f-ing brain for a change ! Would you attack me if i put out my hand to shake yours ? or would you attack me if i take on a aggressive stance ?
Did i suggest disarming ? No, i suggested using diplomacy to solve problems. Battle should be used as a last resort. And even then : it NEVER has solved anything, if only works when it is followed by diplomacy.
read your history a bit more careful. WWI ended after the Versailles treaty or the armistice of November 11, and WW2 ended after the surrender of 19/08/1945. this falls under DIPLOMACY. Without surrender, the battle keeps raging.
2500 years of european history TEACHES you that the ONLY time europe was in peace, was after the formation of the european union. this formation was completely voluntary, and without need of violence.
you may believe so, but the perception that the US won't keep its word, will hinder any diplomatic action. Diplomacy is the only way to keep international peace.
Slashdot Mirror
Does this mean that your account number is enough to make a withdrawal from it ? No secret code necessary ?????? no card required ?
the nation financially "challenged", to put it mildly
here are some numbers :
http://www.cedarcomm.com/~stevelm1/usdebt.htm
and
http://www.lafn.org/gvdc/Natl_Debt_Chart.html
One True Solution
die EndlÃsung?
Creating games is usually a whole lot more complicated and requires a lot more knowledge and experience than the average business application
I would prefer to say different rather than harder. Creating business apps also requires some skills that are not found in games, for example : disentangling the business rules, interacting with users, making sense of the 20 year old system which consists of cobol-programs, jcl, ... all written by 20 different people which aren't there anymore, and you're stuck with a database which is a melting pot of 3 older systems ...
actually, hydrogen is more explosive than petrol ...
no, i care for the environment, and what i hear among like-minded people: we need an electric car that's PRACTICAL and SIMPLE, like jetta wagon/golf wagon, and if that means we only get 150 miles range, so be it. most people i know that care for the environment don't be smug about it. the ones that are smug about it, don't really care much for the environment.
the tgv that did 574Kph (357 mph) did use an electric motor.
cars that look like the prius don't help this.
So if people can see electric cars with real performance that would even surpass the petrol counterpart it should make people more likely to change.
Just a tought, but maybe the major car makers WANT this? It seems to me that they produce ugly,slow cars that won't appeal to the masses with a reason. After all, electric cars need much, MUCH less maintenance and spare parts than a petrol car ... Lets hope the smaller manufacturers see the gap in the market.
One could wonder whether the project was set up to adress terrorism OR it was setup to generate media-attention ?
Linux is a multi-headed hydra
I thought it was a pinguin. Maybe we can come to a compromise; can someone paste a few heads onto Tux ?
Elevate the dialogue, dammit.
are you new to /. ?
maybe you should check your sources. In case you're feeling a bit lazy, I'll provide you with a few links:
http://www.cedarcomm.com/~stevelm1/usdebt.htm
and
http://www.lafn.org/gvdc/Natl_Debt_Chart.html
or climate scientists ?
if we didn't flip-flop, we would still be living in caves
What about cost ? I'd rather have lower efficiency, if it means it's cheaper per Kwh.
photosythesis in plants is no more than 6% (source:wikipedia).
If you apply this process to make homegrown hydrogen, this would be an advantage; in current conditions, we have to transport our petrol, natural gas, electricty to our houses.
They can't ensure 100% safety. I wouldn't want to be in the neighbourhood when a rocket with plutonium explodes. And there is nowhere enough nuclear material to provide for the whole world.
i know that. let's go to your "there are some who would attack you either way" ... who is behaving like that? ... IRAQ ... And all the while saying that they're the good guys ...
jeezes ... use your f-ing brain for a change ! Would you attack me if i put out my hand to shake yours ? or would you attack me if i take on a aggressive stance ?
Did i suggest disarming ? No, i suggested using diplomacy to solve problems. Battle should be used as a last resort. And even then : it NEVER has solved anything, if only works when it is followed by diplomacy.
Compare the borders between France and germany, with the same orders in 1937
read your history a bit more careful. WWI ended after the Versailles treaty or the armistice of November 11, and WW2 ended after the surrender of 19/08/1945. this falls under DIPLOMACY. Without surrender, the battle keeps raging.
2500 years of european history TEACHES you that the ONLY time europe was in peace, was after the formation of the european union. this formation was completely voluntary, and without need of violence.
you may believe so, but the perception that the US won't keep its word, will hinder any diplomatic action. Diplomacy is the only way to keep international peace.