Ivanka is also named in this lawsuit filed by New York over massive abuse by the Trump foundation, and criminal referrals were also made to the IRS. It certainly doesn't stop here.
This civil suit is only one thing that is being done. By flipping the house, Democrats now have an enormously expanded set of tools. It's sad that every single Republican is a turncoat, but even that damage can be worked around.
Suppose you break down your neighbor's door in order to reveal the truth about something that lies inside the house. Does revealing the truth immunize you?
It's not as straightforward as that. The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act provides a commercial activity exception that appears to be the basis for this lawsuit, which names Russia as a co-conspirator in a racket. Trump is also named as a co-conspirator.
The freaking message is a false dichotomy: can't terraform therefore can't live. But other possibilities exist, for example one can terraform a bubble.
I can't believe people still have the nerve to spew that same tired and discredited "Linux runs on everything" garbage.
Who spews that? Only you. Of course, you can make Linux run on just about anything that calls itself a computer if you want too. The fact is, Linux does run on more hardware than any other OS in the known universe. That's not everything, but pretty darn close.
Because you have the source, you can update it yourself, or you can find a like-minded group to maintain it. This sort of thing goes on all the time with Linux.
Of course, you may find one day that the 486 is just too slow (though they did live on as industrial controllers a lot longer than commonly known) and you will move on for that reason. Never because you can't update the software.
I know, this concept is hard to understand by someone who is used to just being screwed by companies that control hardware and software, the latter being jealously guarded, and hidden away rather than shared with those who need it.
Indignant Windows hack reacts indignantly to suggestion that Windows remains a rotten swiss cheese of vulnerabilities after all these years, news at 11.
How can you extinguish the fire of open source software by dousing it with gasoline?
Logical fallacy: argument from analogy. It's not actually fire and not actually gasoline. In practical terms, you extinguish Github by making the top project be a topheavy text editor written in crappy javascript and the fastest growing project be documentation for a proprietary cloud service. Then you plant articles like this to ensure the drip drip of projects leaving Github turns into a mass exodus.
Slashdot Mirror
Ivanka is also named in this lawsuit filed by New York over massive abuse by the Trump foundation, and criminal referrals were also made to the IRS. It certainly doesn't stop here.
This civil suit is only one thing that is being done. By flipping the house, Democrats now have an enormously expanded set of tools. It's sad that every single Republican is a turncoat, but even that damage can be worked around.
You a risk denier, unlike everybody else in the picture, Including Intel.
Go back to 4chan.
It might be nice to know a little more about the murders.
So according to you, Americans should do Russia a favor by hacking the Kremlin?
In away, it's good to know that Slashdot is considered important enough to be assigned its own Russian shitmodders.
That's what we want to know.
Suppose you break down your neighbor's door in order to reveal the truth about something that lies inside the house. Does revealing the truth immunize you?
So according to you, Americans should do Russia a favor by hacking the Kremlin?
It's not as straightforward as that. The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act provides a commercial activity exception that appears to be the basis for this lawsuit, which names Russia as a co-conspirator in a racket. Trump is also named as a co-conspirator.
Article summary: "wah wah wah can't live on Mars because my spacesuit will stink!"
Focus on the freaking message.
The freaking message is a false dichotomy: can't terraform therefore can't live. But other possibilities exist, for example one can terraform a bubble.
Would you rather live in a bubble on Mars or in the path of a wildfire in California?
the Moon or Mars where there's effectively no surface water to take.
Not true.
Set up housekeeping on Mars or Chicago? Nice warm and safe tunnel vs taken out by a gangsta. Hmm, tough one.
I can't believe people still have the nerve to spew that same tired and discredited "Linux runs on everything" garbage.
Who spews that? Only you. Of course, you can make Linux run on just about anything that calls itself a computer if you want too. The fact is, Linux does run on more hardware than any other OS in the known universe. That's not everything, but pretty darn close.
Usually better.
Because you have the source, you can update it yourself, or you can find a like-minded group to maintain it. This sort of thing goes on all the time with Linux.
Of course, you may find one day that the 486 is just too slow (though they did live on as industrial controllers a lot longer than commonly known) and you will move on for that reason. Never because you can't update the software.
I know, this concept is hard to understand by someone who is used to just being screwed by companies that control hardware and software, the latter being jealously guarded, and hidden away rather than shared with those who need it.
I have very old Apple laptops that still work perfectly well.
With no updates, ever, unlike Linux.
Apple offers as a service, that it will keep your device current for a while.
A good reason to never use Apple. Linux will keep your device current forever.
we can thank Linux in terms of hosting web apps and making Android tablets which devalued operating systems to nothing.
Linux reduced the cost of operating systems, not the value.
Indignant Windows hack reacts indignantly to suggestion that Windows remains a rotten swiss cheese of vulnerabilities after all these years, news at 11.
Dead Steve Jobs to Tim Cook: "Do something!"
$7.5 bn dollars is what redmond paid for this outfit.
Didn't Microsoft also buy Hotmail and Nokia's phone division?
How can you extinguish the fire of open source software by dousing it with gasoline?
Logical fallacy: argument from analogy. It's not actually fire and not actually gasoline. In practical terms, you extinguish Github by making the top project be a topheavy text editor written in crappy javascript and the fastest growing project be documentation for a proprietary cloud service. Then you plant articles like this to ensure the drip drip of projects leaving Github turns into a mass exodus.