Wouldn't it be the project leader who monitors these on an individual basis? If a coder isn't pulling their weight its up to the project leader to address it up to the point of termination. Above that you have a suit who monitors the project leader's team performance and decides how well the project leader is doing. Of all the places layered management doesn't work, coding is not one of them. It's a challenge to hold a developer accountable because there are so many different approaches to the same problem in coding and a lot have definitive pros and cons.
But u cant load backtrack or any of the related software, why would you try to crack an open AP? Laptops are still quite useful, they ship with i7s nowadays if you have the $. Helps a lot when your time is worth something:)
Better yet why doesn't Yates come up with some OC? He already prevented a generation from reading HP for better or worse. Then again do kids still read? And who's actually watched Dr. who?
In windows TOR binds to localhost (127.0.0.1) and you can channel any traffic through it, not sure how it runs on apple, but if there is a localhost on an ipad for Tor to use, you can channel any app that supports proxying through 127.0.0.1, but I'm speaking from a windows environment... ipads tend to be a bit more locked down, no idea though, just throwing it out there.
OPs method is pretty anonymous. How would you reverse it? You'd have to get caught on camera somewhere, say if you walked into the library to use it and they had security cams and the investigator pulls the tape assuming its still available and sees you physically there using the wifi, but I think OP is talking a little more remote than my simple example. Further, if you access an AP and it logs your MAC, the MAC record can be traced to your NIC's MAC. macmakeup.exe takes care of this in under 1 mb of harddrive space. So to expand on OP, the previous two points you gotta consider, but they are EASILY circumnavigated.
I'd worry more about the guy coming out with a bat while your in the VAN in front of his house asking wtf are you doing, or if your unlucky you connect to a honeypot meant to log you, but those are general risks associated with open AP and a little creativity and networking knowledge can walk around those too.
Now for the real question, what is worth doing for the average citizen that is worth packing a laptop into a car and going warring for an open AP? As it's been an non-issue up to this point with only a few cases of unauthorized access leading to false accusations, its just how it is, people don't watch for vans outside their homes that are potentially stealing their wifi. And that's without getting into repeaters and promiscuous modes:P
Slashdot can also be buggy in regards to:) What if the checkbox accidently gets unchecked by a web admin script and I get my ad, wouldn't that violate the TOS stating that I can disable ads which I chose to do so with proper contributions? Can I sue? Whoever wrote this proposed law has their head so far up their ass they can see china.
There are plenty of valid business scenarios that constitute increased ROI from using such a chip as opposed to a lesser chip. This thing should be getting benched against the i7 extreme, not the amd proc which can't compete w the extreme to start w (all due respect to AMD it wasn't meant to article is just a little dirka dur).
Also remember, you can OC... this processor, so if your willing to take the jump, you can get even more out of it, and the proc isn't limited by the software your running, it's simply designed to run a lot of software at once whether the software is designed to run on multi core arch or not. If you have a lot of apps you need open at once as required with a lot of dev / graphics positions, for a company the increased productivity might steep the cost of the proc, of course not every IT person can take advantage of it either.
I get where your coming from here too, but nobody said they liked chrome's versioning, so why follow it?
You incrememt your major version 4.x.x.x when you release new major features, an example would be ff sync,that's worth a +1, however bug fixes do not constitute a +1 on almost any model but chrome's. So a lot of the backlash your getting is from users who are used to following more standardized versioning schemes and aren't google lackies.
The article straight up states that there is no standard for versioning, however what they're providing is used by many many projects, possibly one can make the argument ALL projects BUT chrome and ff use something in this light. ff used this versioning I believe and then cut over to google causing mass confusing and misunderstanding, why???
Thanks for your response, and I do understand the software upgrade process quite well...
My recommendation to you, putting it bluntly is to fix 90% of your bugs before deploying any new version, whether that version contains the bug fixes or the previous version does is irrelivant, but I know that the browser market while being free of charge is still ultra competitive, and the competition just doesn't have the instabilities that have been introduced into what used to be a rock stable firefox build cycle.
I also understand that mozilla is non-profit and doesn't have a floor in an office building devoted to QC, but that doesn't mean you need to drop your standard, as a user I can wait 1,2, 6 months for you to release a new version of ff that is as stable as the old, so if it takes you more time and you release stabile versions you may achieve goals with that kind of process in the browser share market as you will be bringing the faithful back. Notice who's posting in this thread, sys admins, IT ppl, we make recommendations to users and deploy via scripts, we don't just represent a single user, in my case I can net you 1k users in a mornings worth of work if I saw the need to, but there is no way I can recommend something that I can't use well myself.
Releasing new versions of firefox and fix the version you have, I'd appreciate 5.1 greatly, I'd also appreciate my browser not freezing randomly at times for 30 second intervals on the most random of things. I like firefox and I know a lot about its structure, but I have chrome installed now because some stuff just won't work as I want it to in ff. Kind of feels like I threw my chips in and now the project is heading completely downhill, I don't like IE UI & I don't know much about chrome, but holy shit, I'm about done w ff. Anybody from mozilla read forums to get user feedback or anything? Guys?
Hmm, fiber isn't really meant for the average consumer, it benefits most to businesses who have XX/XXX users using the internet simultaneously. Fiber in residential is an excellent opportunity to say host your own domain and servers, but for most people that's not applicable. Here in the states I've had fiber available for a while to my home and my employer would have to pay 70k for the install to get it, so in its current state its mostly useless, a great technology but stupid implementation by stupid people. My 10 meg for $30 on promo gets me through anything I need to do, most of the internet can't POST fast enough for me to care about going above that threshold (10 meg is burst speed, I get 3 meg consistent if I'm lucky, but you realize quite how fast that is?)
Better yet, who still uses mainframes? (Haven't heard this posted yet so I thought I would)
Seriously though, windows blades are not new, they're just looking to do a little bit of cross compatibility here, it's always better that hardware supports the max # of software... right?
Look back far enough and you'll discover the key ingredient in coca cola was...:)
People will always be people, it's just what comes to the surface that changes in these matters.
I'd probably have to say something if I saw a bunch of Indians who probably gave me dirty looks all year, sharing answers amongst themselves and that would sort the problem out eventually whether they remain in the class or not. I don't encourage snitching by any means, but that doesn't mean anybody should be allowed to step on your head on their way to the top.
Remember, these are the same people you may have to work with and rely upon in the future, nobody should get what they don't deserve -- cheating and not getting caught is a whole different skill though, ingenuity rates highly in my book.
I agree here sadly enough, the curriculum at a lot of universities and what's in the real world have little to do with each other. Sometimes the university is even a pre-cursor to the real world curriculum and doesn't actually roll out ready to go tools (ehm employees). Med school is a fine example of this, your hand will be in someone's rectum long before you get your official degree. IT isn't much better... A lot of people are going for writing, are we going to sustain this country via our literature sales to foreign countries that don't speak English?
The best people in my CIS class (myself excluded:P) didn't even graduate, they landed jobs with lockheed, data centers, and other similar places before they graduated and never bothered to finish, what does that have to say for our curriculum, I guess that senior year isn't as knowledge filled as people make it out to be.
And trust me, smart students will realize what busy work is and how much time the universities actually waste, so not having partaken in it myself, why not cheat, your not getting shit out of it anyways, you'll learn more about life from that girl you meet at the party than you ever will from Shakespeare. History is great, real life is better and if your still in school, remember you actually have to outsmart the system to cheat in it, it's not for everybody and thus why people get caught. Being stupid and lazy = no degree for you. Being smart and lazy... hmmm....
I get that automation is useful, that is not the topic here, the topic is google MAKING YOU use their search bar for THEIR product and the only way to USE their + feature is to use google search bar. This would be the equivalent of having to go to facebook.com and searching from there, which is fine, but that's not how it's done is it? If it were up to google, google search would be the web, but that's out of context...
Lol faggot, I bet your op trying to troll... take your own advice and make the world a better place, what's the point of posts that spread disinformation and lies?
If you don't understand why HAVING TO USE google's search engine to utilize the + feature does not conform to a url (the thing you use to access websites) then Idk what to say to you, alone indeed. Try the astronomy section of slashdot.
Slashdot Mirror
Give her some nyquil?
Wouldn't it be the project leader who monitors these on an individual basis? If a coder isn't pulling their weight its up to the project leader to address it up to the point of termination. Above that you have a suit who monitors the project leader's team performance and decides how well the project leader is doing. Of all the places layered management doesn't work, coding is not one of them. It's a challenge to hold a developer accountable because there are so many different approaches to the same problem in coding and a lot have definitive pros and cons.
But u cant load backtrack or any of the related software, why would you try to crack an open AP? Laptops are still quite useful, they ship with i7s nowadays if you have the $. Helps a lot when your time is worth something :)
The pirate bay has a much better forensics engine and rips the RIAA for the dogs they are, enough said.
Better yet why doesn't Yates come up with some OC? He already prevented a generation from reading HP for better or worse. Then again do kids still read? And who's actually watched Dr. who?
Antitrust?
In windows TOR binds to localhost (127.0.0.1) and you can channel any traffic through it, not sure how it runs on apple, but if there is a localhost on an ipad for Tor to use, you can channel any app that supports proxying through 127.0.0.1, but I'm speaking from a windows environment... ipads tend to be a bit more locked down, no idea though, just throwing it out there.
OPs method is pretty anonymous. How would you reverse it? You'd have to get caught on camera somewhere, say if you walked into the library to use it and they had security cams and the investigator pulls the tape assuming its still available and sees you physically there using the wifi, but I think OP is talking a little more remote than my simple example. Further, if you access an AP and it logs your MAC, the MAC record can be traced to your NIC's MAC. macmakeup.exe takes care of this in under 1 mb of harddrive space. So to expand on OP, the previous two points you gotta consider, but they are EASILY circumnavigated.
I'd worry more about the guy coming out with a bat while your in the VAN in front of his house asking wtf are you doing, or if your unlucky you connect to a honeypot meant to log you, but those are general risks associated with open AP and a little creativity and networking knowledge can walk around those too.
Now for the real question, what is worth doing for the average citizen that is worth packing a laptop into a car and going warring for an open AP? As it's been an non-issue up to this point with only a few cases of unauthorized access leading to false accusations, its just how it is, people don't watch for vans outside their homes that are potentially stealing their wifi. And that's without getting into repeaters and promiscuous modes :P
Slashdot can also be buggy in regards to :) What if the checkbox accidently gets unchecked by a web admin script and I get my ad, wouldn't that violate the TOS stating that I can disable ads which I chose to do so with proper contributions? Can I sue? Whoever wrote this proposed law has their head so far up their ass they can see china.
and lag equally on both in applications yet to be designed for this high of performance? :P
There are plenty of valid business scenarios that constitute increased ROI from using such a chip as opposed to a lesser chip. This thing should be getting benched against the i7 extreme, not the amd proc which can't compete w the extreme to start w (all due respect to AMD it wasn't meant to article is just a little dirka dur).
Also remember, you can OC... this processor, so if your willing to take the jump, you can get even more out of it, and the proc isn't limited by the software your running, it's simply designed to run a lot of software at once whether the software is designed to run on multi core arch or not. If you have a lot of apps you need open at once as required with a lot of dev / graphics positions, for a company the increased productivity might steep the cost of the proc, of course not every IT person can take advantage of it either.
I get where your coming from here too, but nobody said they liked chrome's versioning, so why follow it?
You incrememt your major version 4.x.x.x when you release new major features, an example would be ff sync,that's worth a +1, however bug fixes do not constitute a +1 on almost any model but chrome's. So a lot of the backlash your getting is from users who are used to following more standardized versioning schemes and aren't google lackies.
(Major version).(Minor version).(Revision number).(Build number)
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/02/whats-in-a-version-number-anyway.html
The article straight up states that there is no standard for versioning, however what they're providing is used by many many projects, possibly one can make the argument ALL projects BUT chrome and ff use something in this light. ff used this versioning I believe and then cut over to google causing mass confusing and misunderstanding, why???
Thanks for your response, and I do understand the software upgrade process quite well...
My recommendation to you, putting it bluntly is to fix 90% of your bugs before deploying any new version, whether that version contains the bug fixes or the previous version does is irrelivant, but I know that the browser market while being free of charge is still ultra competitive, and the competition just doesn't have the instabilities that have been introduced into what used to be a rock stable firefox build cycle.
I also understand that mozilla is non-profit and doesn't have a floor in an office building devoted to QC, but that doesn't mean you need to drop your standard, as a user I can wait 1,2, 6 months for you to release a new version of ff that is as stable as the old, so if it takes you more time and you release stabile versions you may achieve goals with that kind of process in the browser share market as you will be bringing the faithful back. Notice who's posting in this thread, sys admins, IT ppl, we make recommendations to users and deploy via scripts, we don't just represent a single user, in my case I can net you 1k users in a mornings worth of work if I saw the need to, but there is no way I can recommend something that I can't use well myself.
P.S. the updates don't break chrome like they do firefox. They still have QC going in their process.
Releasing new versions of firefox and fix the version you have, I'd appreciate 5.1 greatly, I'd also appreciate my browser not freezing randomly at times for 30 second intervals on the most random of things. I like firefox and I know a lot about its structure, but I have chrome installed now because some stuff just won't work as I want it to in ff. Kind of feels like I threw my chips in and now the project is heading completely downhill, I don't like IE UI & I don't know much about chrome, but holy shit, I'm about done w ff. Anybody from mozilla read forums to get user feedback or anything? Guys?
Hmm, fiber isn't really meant for the average consumer, it benefits most to businesses who have XX/XXX users using the internet simultaneously. Fiber in residential is an excellent opportunity to say host your own domain and servers, but for most people that's not applicable. Here in the states I've had fiber available for a while to my home and my employer would have to pay 70k for the install to get it, so in its current state its mostly useless, a great technology but stupid implementation by stupid people. My 10 meg for $30 on promo gets me through anything I need to do, most of the internet can't POST fast enough for me to care about going above that threshold (10 meg is burst speed, I get 3 meg consistent if I'm lucky, but you realize quite how fast that is?)
Better yet, who still uses mainframes? (Haven't heard this posted yet so I thought I would)
Seriously though, windows blades are not new, they're just looking to do a little bit of cross compatibility here, it's always better that hardware supports the max # of software... right?
Look back far enough and you'll discover the key ingredient in coca cola was... :)
People will always be people, it's just what comes to the surface that changes in these matters.
I'd probably have to say something if I saw a bunch of Indians who probably gave me dirty looks all year, sharing answers amongst themselves and that would sort the problem out eventually whether they remain in the class or not. I don't encourage snitching by any means, but that doesn't mean anybody should be allowed to step on your head on their way to the top.
Remember, these are the same people you may have to work with and rely upon in the future, nobody should get what they don't deserve -- cheating and not getting caught is a whole different skill though, ingenuity rates highly in my book.
You can convert most of those tools into weapons given the right mindset, otherwise just pick up a rock and throw it.
I agree here sadly enough, the curriculum at a lot of universities and what's in the real world have little to do with each other. Sometimes the university is even a pre-cursor to the real world curriculum and doesn't actually roll out ready to go tools (ehm employees). Med school is a fine example of this, your hand will be in someone's rectum long before you get your official degree. IT isn't much better... A lot of people are going for writing, are we going to sustain this country via our literature sales to foreign countries that don't speak English?
The best people in my CIS class (myself excluded :P) didn't even graduate, they landed jobs with lockheed, data centers, and other similar places before they graduated and never bothered to finish, what does that have to say for our curriculum, I guess that senior year isn't as knowledge filled as people make it out to be.
And trust me, smart students will realize what busy work is and how much time the universities actually waste, so not having partaken in it myself, why not cheat, your not getting shit out of it anyways, you'll learn more about life from that girl you meet at the party than you ever will from Shakespeare. History is great, real life is better and if your still in school, remember you actually have to outsmart the system to cheat in it, it's not for everybody and thus why people get caught. Being stupid and lazy = no degree for you. Being smart and lazy... hmmm....
I get that automation is useful, that is not the topic here, the topic is google MAKING YOU use their search bar for THEIR product and the only way to USE their + feature is to use google search bar. This would be the equivalent of having to go to facebook.com and searching from there, which is fine, but that's not how it's done is it? If it were up to google, google search would be the web, but that's out of context...
So if I wanted to access plus.google.com and I happen to be using lynx and I wanted to access pepsi directly, please advise what would I do?
They are trying to replace a url based approach with their own.
Lol faggot, I bet your op trying to troll... take your own advice and make the world a better place, what's the point of posts that spread disinformation and lies?
umm.. not sure if your trolling but, don't talk about the web if you don't know how to use google or what a url is...
http://www.w3.org/Addressing/
If you don't understand why HAVING TO USE google's search engine to utilize the + feature does not conform to a url (the thing you use to access websites) then Idk what to say to you, alone indeed. Try the astronomy section of slashdot.