The risk of distilling homebrew is greatly exaggerated (for obvious reasons). If you can drink it before distillation, you have to really mess up your process to get toxins afterwards.
If you ask for data to be transported via ftp, smb, irc, or whatever protocol you need, that's what firefox does. The fact that some IRC servers don't want large amounts of automatically generated data but still fail to block it is not a firefox bug.
I find it surprising that the auhors seem to think that Darwinian selection only happens to organisms, but not to the genes that are being spliced. Perhaps the only paradigm they need to shift is their misconception of what exactly evolves in evolution.
Away from paradigms and towards an evolutionary theory of the development of science.
Btw, Horizontal gene transfer is only different from 'standard' evolution if you think all evolution occurs at the organism level instead of at the gene level.
I could recommend an excellent book on that subject.
Two thoughts on that: When Saab isn't required to buy substandard GM gear at inflated prices it may turn out to be profitable yet. And obviously SAAB doesn't need to be profitable, if they manage to restore a bit of the brands credibility, that in itself will increase the share value enough to sell it back to GM with a profit.
Being unwilling to learn, or unwilling to ask someone who does know, would still qualify as refusing to fix the problem.
Here's a car analogy for you:
The users who are likely to crash by failing breaks are the least likely to be able to repair their own brakes...
The radiocativity of rocks can easily be measured, so the heat production is clear. The discussion how relevant the contribution of each rock is for the whole heat budget is more complicated however.
You sound like a crackpot in training. Everybody in the field knows that DNA mutation rates need not be uniform, so the alleged 'faith' only exists in your imagination. Furthermore ascribing random claims to evolutionary theory and pretending to have been an atheist is characteristic for the dumber religiously inspired anti-evolutionist pamphlets. I wonder why you felt the need to post this rubbish when you clearly can be smarter than this. Or did you just leave your terminal unattended?
Stop being so hypersensitive, if you post an opinion you will get feedback from the continuum. Asking for scientific rigour in a broad and politicized debate will tend to give you more negative than positive feedback because of Sturgeons law.
Slashdot Mirror
00101000100011110101000101010?
You're actually willing to torture your victim indefinitely to please your sense of righteousness?
Depends on which federation we are talking about.
There is no evidence paying bankers huge amounts is effective; but that hasn't stopped the government from trying that.
The risk of distilling homebrew is greatly exaggerated (for obvious reasons). If you can drink it before distillation, you have to really mess up your process to get toxins afterwards.
How do you fix a non existing problem?
Or are you suggesting TFA is just BS?
I suppose TFA consists of blank pages if I check the disable advertising box?
Fast breeder reactors are not a popular topic in Germany.
If you've personally handled the evidence I can see a way in which you could truthfully claim that.
But I'm a cynic.
Let me give you the official microsoft reply:
It is a feature
If you ask for data to be transported via ftp, smb, irc, or whatever protocol you need, that's what firefox does. The fact that some IRC servers don't want large amounts of automatically generated data but still fail to block it is not a firefox bug.
bc, dc and the like are arbitrary precision calculators:
scale=1000
sqrt(3)
1.732050807568877293527446341505872366942805253810380628055806979451\ 93301690880003708114618675724857567562614141540670302996994509499895\ 24788116555120943736485280932319023055820679748201010846749232650153\ 12343266903322886650672254668921837971227047131660367861588019049986\ 53737985938946765034750657605075661834812960610094760218719032508314\ 58295239598329977898245082887144638329173472241639845878553976679580\ 63818353666110843173780894378316102088305524901670023520711144288695\ 99095636579708716849807289949329648428302078640860398873869753758231\ 73178313959929830078387028770539133695633121037072640192491067682311\ 99288375641141422016742752102372994270831059898459475987664288897796\ 14783795839022885485290357603385280806438197234466105968972287286526\ 41538226646984200211954841552784411812865345070351916500166892944154\ 80846071277143999762926834629577438361895110127148638746976545982451\ 78855097537901388066496191196222295711055524292372319219773826256163\ 14688420328537166829386496119170497388363954959381
So the majority of slashdot posters are less than 17
I think the parent was referring to mental age. So below 17 should be spot on.
http://www.google.com/search?q=multiple+display+X11
Let me think.
You want 'multiple displays on X11' and you need a clue for three keywords?
Nah. Too hard.
Which toe?
I find it surprising that the auhors seem to think that Darwinian selection only happens to organisms, but not to the genes that are being spliced.
Perhaps the only paradigm they need to shift is their misconception of what exactly evolves in evolution.
Away from paradigms and towards an evolutionary theory of the development of science.
Btw, Horizontal gene transfer is only different from 'standard' evolution if you think all evolution occurs at the organism level instead of at the gene level.
I could recommend an excellent book on that subject.
Two thoughts on that: When Saab isn't required to buy substandard GM gear at inflated prices it may turn out to be profitable yet.
And obviously SAAB doesn't need to be profitable, if they manage to restore a bit of the brands credibility, that in itself will increase the share value enough to sell it back to GM with a profit.
Yep, that is what we nowadays call 'document retention policy', it essentially means you get a license to burn evidence before the trial starts.
Being unwilling to learn, or unwilling to ask someone who does know, would still qualify as refusing to fix the problem.
Here's a car analogy for you:
The users who are likely to crash by failing breaks are the least likely to be able to repair their own brakes...
The radiocativity of rocks can easily be measured, so the heat production is clear. The discussion how relevant the contribution of each rock is for the whole heat budget is more complicated however.
You sound like a crackpot in training.
Everybody in the field knows that DNA mutation rates need not be uniform, so the alleged 'faith' only exists in your imagination.
Furthermore ascribing random claims to evolutionary theory and pretending to have been an atheist is characteristic for the dumber religiously inspired anti-evolutionist pamphlets.
I wonder why you felt the need to post this rubbish when you clearly can be smarter than this.
Or did you just leave your terminal unattended?
How many cm is that?
Stop being so hypersensitive, if you post an opinion you will get feedback from the continuum.
Asking for scientific rigour in a broad and politicized debate will tend to give you more negative than positive feedback because of Sturgeons law.
Unless we rapidly evolve some sort of locomotion.
Oh, wait, you're not a coral?
Slightly less dismaying if you consider that most countries have already adopted anti-spam legislation.