so I should have the right to get out restore disks with old computers and not some BS from MS saying that you need to buy an new windows key to be able to sell that system.
colleges also need to be more open on going certs / people who want to learn new skills but don't want to takes 1-2 years of filler and fluff classes + don't want to retake classes as there credits don't fully transfer
I want to be able to buy the rights to use roms in my own emulator and not be locked into the inferior payed ones that piggyed backed on all of the work done by the free ones that came years before them. There are to many to list but some are like why pay for this when the older free (that are still being updated) ones can do stuff the payed can't?
There was this one VM system that replaced the MB of the old system (X86 chip set tied os + custom pci card that booted the system + was also the storage) that controlled hardware over the parallel port. An no that OS on the pci card will not run on newer X86 hardware right as the os only had drivers for the chip set in came on.
But they where forced to sell it and give the Original IP holders an cut. (there is a much bigger story with it) But the point that is wrong is why should people be forced to re buy the IP rights to fix there own hardware. We don't need any chilling effect from things like this.
Like why does apple not want farmers to be able to do tractor repair with out needing to pay dealer fees.
Slashdot Mirror
but how much software does it by ACL's? some from repo installs may just do it the old non ACL way.
so one script for each os base line? and not any added software that has it's own per app rights.
yum reinstall * and reedit any changes by hand?
That will be $75/HR or I can just reload from backup.
windows has better group permissions and multi user ones.
self checkout makes it hard to Prosecute shoplifting as someone can say did not scan right.
redbox has the funds to go to court you small shop does not.
so I should have the right to get out restore disks with old computers and not some BS from MS saying that you need to buy an new windows key to be able to sell that system.
UBI is cheaper then lockup
1GB can cost 15K-20K with some roaming plans
as long eSIM can't not be carrier locked
colleges also need to be more open on going certs / people who want to learn new skills but don't want to takes 1-2 years of filler and fluff classes + don't want to retake classes as there credits don't fully transfer
I want to be able to buy the rights to use roms in my own emulator and not be locked into the inferior payed ones that piggyed backed on all of the work done by the free ones that came years before them. There are to many to list but some are like why pay for this when the older free (that are still being updated) ones can do stuff the payed can't?
Right to repair needs to = no rebuying software.
There was this one VM system that replaced the MB of the old system (X86 chip set tied os + custom pci card that booted the system + was also the storage) that controlled hardware over the parallel port. An no that OS on the pci card will not run on newer X86 hardware right as the os only had drivers for the chip set in came on.
But they where forced to sell it and give the Original IP holders an cut. (there is a much bigger story with it) But the point that is wrong is why should people be forced to re buy the IP rights to fix there own hardware. We don't need any chilling effect from things like this.
Like why does apple not want farmers to be able to do tractor repair with out needing to pay dealer fees.
robocop k-9 coming soon! It can do stairs like an real dog as well.
HIT ME!
don't forget welfare ken that works the system after being layed off.
Math class is tough!
ceph and HBA in IT mode works and easy to move disks if an server dies (also your storage will stay up if an full server goes down)
Yes do that os update needs an reboot live.
AMD EPYC is for you PCI-E no switches needed.
small sata dom's also work for boot even on storage severs 8GB is fine for Linux unless you really a lot of room for logs.
amd epyc has the pci-e io to drive a lot of disks with just 1 cpu. Just 9 disks at X4 + 2X 10 gig-e maxes out 1 Intel cpu.
autopilot software has a high level of testing and fail safe modes that drives up dev costs.
iscsi sucks (Ceph man) wait ESXI can't use that with out an iscsi gateway.
the faa will not like uber independent contractor system when it comes down to responsibly for safety and upkeep.
why not pci-e?