Re:I can see it now...
on
Awari Solved
·
· Score: 2
I thought you could appreciate some of your own humor
You are doing some serious crack if you thought that was funny. I'm sure youre being sarcastic. It's about as funny as your useless pixel-wasting post about "Microsoft Awari" was. Which is the whole point, of course. But you seem stupidly unable -or unwilling- to somehow grok that.
[Score 0, Troll]
Not only stupid, but also truly pathetic.
Re:I can see it now...
on
Awari Solved
·
· Score: 2
Well, I have just read your most recent 24 comments
littleRedFriend figures out how to use Slashdot, film at 11.
all you ever do is bitch about spelling
Oh, no. Sometimes I do much more than that.
So please, enlighten us, by telling us your standards of humor
Allow me to quote your original, enlightening and very funny post verbatim, below:
Microsoft Awari.
Minimal system requirements:
distributed computer cluster with 144 Athlons XP+2600
72 Gb of RAM
778 gigabyte free disk space
1.0 petabit Ethernet card
I could go on and on. But do I really need to? No. I just wandered what dank smelly hole you crawled out of.
Yes, do us all a favor and post arguments why you don't like something
You misunderstand. I'm not attempting to "argument" anything, nor am I inclined to do you any favors. The more you post this lame, unfunny tired shit, the more people like me will flame you. You might think it's funny, and a lot of your loser wannabe h^xx0rz friends may agree, but I don't. You are a fucking disgrace to the very group of people you imagine yourself belonging to, and you continue to prove that by somehow thinking that your post deserves any type of further exploration - while of course it obviously doesn't. You could have taken your medicine and left. But this attempt at justifying your ridiculous "joke" is getting... well, ridiculous. Wouldn't you agree?
And your spelling sucks.
STFU
Still not funny - try again.
Re:I can see it now...
on
Awari Solved
·
· Score: 2
Coming from the genius mind that created the hilarious "Microsoft Awari", that seems a bit weak. Try again.
Re:I can see it now...
on
Awari Solved
·
· Score: 2
I can't find your funny comment. Since you're an expert on humor, can you show us your contributions?
"Contributions"? What are you, this guy's mom?
FOAD
Re:I can see it now...
on
Awari Solved
·
· Score: 2
You so funny.
Now crawl back into the hole you unfortunately emerged from.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You so funny! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You so original! You make me laugh! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You funny man! I like you jokes! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Wow... my sides are hurting with that funny, funny quip you just threw down on us like some clever maniacal funny man! You so funny! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Someone will even probably mod you as funny to show how funny you really are to the rest of us! Quip, quip says you! Everyone! Over here! Look at the funny man! He made a funny about the visual representation of Windows! Get it? visual... representation... toddler.... artwork... Windows! HAHAHAHAHA! It's a reference to Windows... yes, how it's like 'toddler artwork'... HAHAHAHAHA! Yes, I am not sure where this guy is from but boy is he funny! Who invited him to the party? We gotta have this guy over more often! Honey? Come down here a second and listen to this guy 'tell it like it is' in a really funny way. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! "M$", that's priceless. "I see enough toddler artwork." Gold. Just pure gold. How do you do it? I mean, so many people post on Slashdot but then you see a funny gem like this. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Pure hilarity. When's the last time you actually used saw the insides of the Windows kernel and so wittily remarked about it? If you'd ever seen the Windows kernel in any way shape or form this wouldn't apply and hence your joke would 'have no teeth' as it were. But the brilliance of you tying in 'M$ Windows' with kernel maps and toddler artwork had me splitting my sides. And your Slashdot handle? Fascist Christ!? Jesus Christ!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I love it! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You funny man. So clever, so very very clever. I'll bet you were the funny man in high school too. Wow. You still got it!
How many C++ IDE's tell you which classes descend from a particular parent, or let you see all the members in the class (including parent classes recursively).
Where do you people come from? I mean - is there some sort of obscure, far away gigantic cavernous research facility where they keep massive test tubes filled with copies of Free As In Beer (TM) advocate clones who can't spell to save their lives? And then periodically release them to the world armed with the Slackware ISOs, a "First Post" T-shirt, a printed copy of the Halloween document and a modem?
Here are some charts with numbers. In two scales. In a format 60% of Slashdot users can't read.
They show users. Users of GNU/Linux. They extrapolate some numbers that are really not valid so as to show that by some time in the future, more people will be using GNU/Linux. They do. When in the future? Who knows. But they extrapolate very well.
The numbers have no bearing on anything, nor are they real. But they show that some folks use GNU/Linux. Therefore, we can conclude with alacrity that some users DO NOT use GNU/Linux, and also that by definition, they are using something else. This is the REAL power of GNU/Linux - it can be... extrapolated.
Unlike other operating systems, which have concrete data such as license sales, GNU/Linux does not. So it must rely on these charts to figure out that maybe in a few years more folks will be running GNU/Linux. Maybe.
What does this mean? Nothing, really. Do these numbers matter at all? No, not really. Are they real, like, um, pulled from some poll or study? Er... no.
So I therefore ask: what's the point?
And then it hits me - no point. Just another small chance to build up the FUD with the unwashed masses.
-----------
Welcome to #haxxor_chatz
h^xx0r_man:d00d, i saw this chart like, where it said that.. wait.. it said that like, 500,0 billion ppls were using Linux!!!1!! seXy_p0k3mon: lamer, its GNU\Linux, lamer! RMS said so!!!1!
withe_h4ttz: mann, thats like, more ppl that in like india or chinas???!! ko0l! h^xx0r_man: ur rigth. M$ suxx!!!!
seXy_p0k3mon: haha _-~#=@@=#~-_
withe_h4ttz: haha
h^xx0r_man: haha
a@lunix has joined #haxxor_chatz
a@lunix: u ahve a crak 4 excel?????
h^xx0r_man:fukc of, lamer!!! seXy_p0k3mon: haha, lamer
withe_h4ttz: haha, lam3r
I'm sure the entire Indian nation is breathlessly reading this Slashdot story and priming themselves to lodge a formal diplomatic protest to the State Department.
To: The USA From: Satarnapayamana Guchanda [sat@hotmail.com]
Dear sir,
I am satarnam... sat, from bombay.india head of the Indian space programme. we hava this rokcett now and going on moon + orbit. pls, would u sent back all our java developers position as we r in dire straight need of J2EE expertises 4 flaight control softwares and codes.
You may want to read this CNET interview with Microsoft security head Scott Charney to learn even more about "trustworthy computing."
And you might want to learn how to give a "paper" the once over (at least) before allowing fucktards like this one to root you in front of all your readers.
This is very interesting reading (not). This dude is a 30-something loser wannabe hacker that throws away all measure of the respect he was trying to obtain by peppering his "paper" with 1337 speallingz like "0wn" and "sploit" to feel more in the know.
His "technique" is kidde fare, nothing any experienced Windows developer doesn't know. His whole premise is based on the idea that "running as SYSTEM" is bad - SYSTEM is designed to be used to run non-interactive services such as SMTP or MSMQ. Installing a service requires administrative rights, as does telling the SCM (Service Control Manager) to allow a given service to interact with the desktop. Microsoft's response is the one I expected to see given how long this "vulnerability" has been known. If you must run a service that interacts with the desktop, run it under a local account which can be locked down and prevented from doing specific things. If anything, this is more the AV vendor's stupid mistake than anything else.
There are tons of actual, real vulnerabilities and problems in Windows (outside of IIS), and most of them reside in the shell code. But those are significantly more difficult to get at than this.
So Mr. "Foon" has proved himself a real bofoon, showed us he sorta kinda understands the process messaging architecture and he knows how to use a debugger and, h^xx0r him, netcat. Woopdedoo!
Not to criticize the editor's "integrity" of course. Who would even consider posting this article for half a million people to see before checking the facts.
Hey, I know! I'll get a website, a kewl IRC handle like "boon", post some techie-sounding text related to some vague problem with Windows and then call it a paper.
Slashdot Mirror
I get 404's for far more pedestrian reasons =)
You are doing some serious crack if you thought that was funny. I'm sure youre being sarcastic. It's about as funny as your useless pixel-wasting post about "Microsoft Awari" was. Which is the whole point, of course. But you seem stupidly unable -or unwilling- to somehow grok that.
[Score 0, Troll]
Not only stupid, but also truly pathetic.
littleRedFriend figures out how to use Slashdot, film at 11.
all you ever do is bitch about spelling
Oh, no. Sometimes I do much more than that.
So please, enlighten us, by telling us your standards of humor
Allow me to quote your original, enlightening and very funny post verbatim, below:
Microsoft Awari.
Minimal system requirements:
distributed computer cluster with 144 Athlons XP+2600
72 Gb of RAM
778 gigabyte free disk space
1.0 petabit Ethernet card
I could go on and on. But do I really need to? No. I just wandered what dank smelly hole you crawled out of.
Yes, do us all a favor and post arguments why you don't like something
You misunderstand. I'm not attempting to "argument" anything, nor am I inclined to do you any favors. The more you post this lame, unfunny tired shit, the more people like me will flame you. You might think it's funny, and a lot of your loser wannabe h^xx0rz friends may agree, but I don't. You are a fucking disgrace to the very group of people you imagine yourself belonging to, and you continue to prove that by somehow thinking that your post deserves any type of further exploration - while of course it obviously doesn't. You could have taken your medicine and left. But this attempt at justifying your ridiculous "joke" is getting... well, ridiculous. Wouldn't you agree?
And your spelling sucks.
STFU
Still not funny - try again.
Coming from the genius mind that created the hilarious "Microsoft Awari", that seems a bit weak. Try again.
"Contributions"? What are you, this guy's mom?
FOAD
Now crawl back into the hole you unfortunately emerged from.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You so funny! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You so original! You make me laugh! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You funny man! I like you jokes! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Wow... my sides are hurting with that funny, funny quip you just threw down on us like some clever maniacal funny man! You so funny! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Someone will even probably mod you as funny to show how funny you really are to the rest of us! Quip, quip says you! Everyone! Over here! Look at the funny man! He made a funny about the visual representation of Windows! Get it? visual... representation... toddler.... artwork... Windows! HAHAHAHAHA! It's a reference to Windows... yes, how it's like 'toddler artwork'... HAHAHAHAHA! Yes, I am not sure where this guy is from but boy is he funny! Who invited him to the party? We gotta have this guy over more often! Honey? Come down here a second and listen to this guy 'tell it like it is' in a really funny way. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! "M$", that's priceless. "I see enough toddler artwork." Gold. Just pure gold. How do you do it? I mean, so many people post on Slashdot but then you see a funny gem like this. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Pure hilarity. When's the last time you actually used saw the insides of the Windows kernel and so wittily remarked about it? If you'd ever seen the Windows kernel in any way shape or form this wouldn't apply and hence your joke would 'have no teeth' as it were. But the brilliance of you tying in 'M$ Windows' with kernel maps and toddler artwork had me splitting my sides. And your Slashdot handle? Fascist Christ!? Jesus Christ!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I love it! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You funny man. So clever, so very very clever. I'll bet you were the funny man in high school too. Wow. You still got it!
Visual Studio.NET
From an Anonymous Coward...
What you say?
It's probably a fill-in template. Couldn't you tell? Not everyone is as fucked up as you, my dear boy.
You really do need to get a life.
Yeah, it gave me a woody, too.
Ah, that explains it then
Or just getting worse at spelling.
These types of things need to be publicized as much as the bad/stupid rulings against MP3 sites or Microsoft.
My most heartfelt apologies, sir.
Let's make it RH then - nobody cares about that one.
Is this where the GNU "Black Ops" budget goes?
They show users. Users of GNU/Linux. They extrapolate some numbers that are really not valid so as to show that by some time in the future, more people will be using GNU/Linux. They do. When in the future? Who knows. But they extrapolate very well.
The numbers have no bearing on anything, nor are they real. But they show that some folks use GNU/Linux. Therefore, we can conclude with alacrity that some users DO NOT use GNU/Linux, and also that by definition, they are using something else. This is the REAL power of GNU/Linux - it can be... extrapolated.
Unlike other operating systems, which have concrete data such as license sales, GNU/Linux does not. So it must rely on these charts to figure out that maybe in a few years more folks will be running GNU/Linux. Maybe.
What does this mean? Nothing, really. Do these numbers matter at all? No, not really. Are they real, like, um, pulled from some poll or study? Er... no.
So I therefore ask: what's the point?
And then it hits me - no point. Just another small chance to build up the FUD with the unwashed masses.
-----------
Welcome to #haxxor_chatz
h^xx0r_man: d00d, i saw this chart like, where it said that.. wait.. it said that like, 500,0 billion ppls were using Linux!!!1!!
seXy_p0k3mon: lamer, its GNU\Linux, lamer! RMS said so!!!1!
withe_h4ttz: mann, thats like, more ppl that in like india or chinas???!! ko0l!
h^xx0r_man: ur rigth. M$ suxx!!!!
seXy_p0k3mon: haha _-~#=@@=#~-_
withe_h4ttz: haha
h^xx0r_man: haha
a@lunix has joined #haxxor_chatz
a@lunix: u ahve a crak 4 excel?????
h^xx0r_man: fukc of, lamer!!!
seXy_p0k3mon: haha, lamer
withe_h4ttz: haha, lam3r
I'm sure the entire Indian nation is breathlessly reading this Slashdot story and priming themselves to lodge a formal diplomatic protest to the State Department.
Just hold your breath.
To: The USA
From: Satarnapayamana Guchanda [sat@hotmail.com]
Dear sir,
I am satarnam... sat, from bombay.india head of the Indian space programme. we hava this rokcett now and going on moon + orbit. pls, would u sent back all our java developers position as we r in dire straight need of J2EE expertises 4 flaight control softwares and codes.
thx!!1!!
respectully your,
sat.
But you have to understand that the "editors" don't give a flying fuck about this and they are not going to do anything about it.
I can almost hear them giggling hysterically: let them buy more banwith!!!1! ... hey..,. we got urselves some and we paide for it!!1!!
Visual C#.NET
There is no One True Computing Platform.
Windows.NET DataCenter Server
There is no One True Ice Cream Flavor.
Chocolate chip.
There is no One True Beer.
Negra Modelo
Un pobre guey
Yep!
And you might want to learn how to give a "paper" the once over (at least) before allowing fucktards like this one to root you in front of all your readers.
His "technique" is kidde fare, nothing any experienced Windows developer doesn't know. His whole premise is based on the idea that "running as SYSTEM" is bad - SYSTEM is designed to be used to run non-interactive services such as SMTP or MSMQ. Installing a service requires administrative rights, as does telling the SCM (Service Control Manager) to allow a given service to interact with the desktop. Microsoft's response is the one I expected to see given how long this "vulnerability" has been known. If you must run a service that interacts with the desktop, run it under a local account which can be locked down and prevented from doing specific things. If anything, this is more the AV vendor's stupid mistake than anything else.
There are tons of actual, real vulnerabilities and problems in Windows (outside of IIS), and most of them reside in the shell code. But those are significantly more difficult to get at than this.
So Mr. "Foon" has proved himself a real bofoon, showed us he sorta kinda understands the process messaging architecture and he knows how to use a debugger and, h^xx0r him, netcat. Woopdedoo!
Not to criticize the editor's "integrity" of course. Who would even consider posting this article for half a million people to see before checking the facts.
Hey, I know! I'll get a website, a kewl IRC handle like "boon", post some techie-sounding text related to some vague problem with Windows and then call it a paper.