Slashdot Mirror


Crushing Experience

sp00 writes "The Tsunamii.Net Crush Server is currently online live from the Millbank Gallery in London! Watch as the webserver counts itself down before it activates the industrial crusher attached to it, bearing 150-tonnes of brute force onto itself and terminating its existence. Check out the details on the Tsunamii.Net website or visit the webserver directly at http://195.195.81.5."

356 comments

  1. /. first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    /. will crush it first.

    (-1 redundent to the other 300 posts saying the same thing)

    1. Re:/. first by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 0, Offtopic



      And -1 redundant to the 300 other posts pointing out the spelling error.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    2. Re:/. first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be far more interesting if they lowered a weight of the same caliber onto it a millimeter per some interval. And move that freaking webcam in closer!

    3. Re:/. first by richie2000 · · Score: 2

      I can't believe I actually watched it count down from 300000.0 to 299999.9 seconds... I need a life. Can I get one on eBay?

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    4. Re:/. first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up ho

  2. Quick! by Akardam · · Score: 0, Redundant

    334321 seconds left! I'm sure we can Slashdot it before then!

    Oh, they meant the other kind of crushing...

    1. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late

  3. If it were a Windows machine... by Woodmeister · · Score: 1, Funny

    it would be poetic justice. But they are crushing a Linux box. Why the unjustifiable violence?

    --

    Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
    -Possum Lodge Motto
    1. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by ramzak2k · · Score: 2, Funny

      But they are crushing a Linux box. Why the unjustifiable violence?
      because it might crash before the counter goes down ?

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    2. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO!

      If I had moderator points...

    3. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who in the hell moderated the parent post as insightful?

      For Chrissake, Slashdot. Is it that easy?

    4. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by InadequateCamel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who cares whether it is Windows or Linux. They are ruining equipment that some school or non-profit organization could really benfit from, and why? Just so a handful of \.ers could make crappy jokes and so this person could become "famous" for a couple of seconds.

    5. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For Chrissake, Slashdot. Is it that easy?


      Yes.

    6. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? This is obviously a Palestinian server!

    7. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by dillon_rinker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right...and every time you buy a CD or go to a movie, you are spending money that school or non-profit could really benefit from. And every time you eat at a restaurant, you are spending money that some hungry person could really benefit from. And every time you take a vacation, you are spending time that could have donated to a local charity. And...

      Entertainment is nonproductive. Deal with it.

    8. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      a handful of \.ers

      Who? A handfull of backslash-dotters? Are they from some the version of /. (that's slash-dot to you) from Gor, or that other universe where Spock has a beard in "Mirror, Mirror", or what?

    9. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by prockcore · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I never thought I'd see the say when a "Think of the Children" knee-jerk post would be moderated as +1 Interesting.

      What a retarded post, you're basically you have the right to judge what is art and what is not, and what other people should do with the hardware they own. Jerk.

    10. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backslash is actually the name of the slashcode admin tool....

    11. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by ramzak2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you missed out "Spending time on slashdot could be better spent with poor people outside - they need love & your time!"

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    12. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      As a former exclusive user of Apple products, things like this annoy me to no end.

      Apple berates M$ for using nonstandard scroll bars. But it's OK for them to do the same.

      What Apple is doing is akin to a man with a 3 inch penis trying to convince women that big fat penises are no good because of the pain that they can cause. Even though 90% of women may prefer big penises, or 90% of the world may prefer something about the Wintel platform Apple is attempting to tell them that they really don't.

      Apple, your future looks dim for a reason. (most) People don't want to buy what you're selling.

      MacOS may have many technical advantages over Windows, just as the devices that run WinCE have advantages over the machines that run Palm OS. But both of the loses trail for other reasons. #1 Price. I can buy a refurbed Visor Deluxe for under $100. I can get a decent PC for less than the cost of an eMac. #2 Availability of software. I can get so much more software for a Palm OS or Windows machine so, in the great platform Jyhad. I choose the side based upon my computing needs. Not on my need to feel or think "different"ly.

    13. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      File extensions are flat out wrong anyway. That is the worst misfeature of VMS too. It still gives me nightmares.

      The part about not using MDI style applications is in my opinion _very_ wrong. I often have 3 or more applications open when working and I find it damn confusing to look at all of them at the same time. Ever hit something outside the program you are working in and then spend time finding your way back? Macs are just crappy to working with if you use more than one program at a time.

      The gui is just not designed to let me move around with speed and ease. Linux and Windows are much better at that.

      Bottom line: Macs are too expensive and slow. I like my new dual mp 2000+; it's cheaper and faster (and it runs Linux properly!).

    14. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by Anderlan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, every time you eat at a restaurant, you are paying people's salaries and wages. Ditto vacation, etc. So, wasting time and stuff: bad. Wasting money: ? Well, there are whole industries that benefit from people doing that. See also Velbein.

      --
      KLAATU, BORADA, NIh*ahem*
    15. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the moron who modded it a troll. Yes, anti-ms comments are guranteed to insight riots on slashdot. Way to go moderators.

    16. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by elizard2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's true, you have a point.
      However every time you buy a CD, or go to a movie, or eat at a restaurant you feed a hungry person too. Maybe not someone who is starving, but you are using services that some people make money. From the rich bastards who made the movie/CD, to the big companies distributing those services (recording companies, big restaurant chains, independent restaurant owners), to the poor people working to provide those services to you. You are feeding someone, it just may not be the people you think of first when you consider the "starving children".

      Anyway, just my $0.02

      --
      - mescaline - its the only way to fly -
    17. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 0

      why is this comment rated +4, when my comment, which was the same thing, has been modded down as a troll. Moderators please fix this.

      --
      GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    18. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by thpdg · · Score: 1

      I am a man, but I can change, if I have to, I guess...

      --

      -Patrick

      "They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

    19. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

      That's not the same thing at all. There are economic benefits to spending money, such as those pointed out by the other posters (salary, economy, etc...). I'm not trying to be a tree-hugger, but what this person is doing has no benefits, unless you want to subscribe to that cop-out response of "It's art". Hell, send the computer to me if you're fed up with it.

    20. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

      I am suggesting that there are more productive ways to use the hardware rather than destroy it.

      And as for the "you're basically (sic) you have the right to judge what is art and what is not", that qualifies as a knee-jerk "it's art, you wouldn't understand" comment of your own, friend. If I am not allowed to judge what is not art, then is everything art? Or is nothing art? There has to be a dividing line somewhere, or it is 100% one or the other, and since I don't think that there is an International Art-Judging Association anywhere, then there is no one to judge it but myself. Or yourself. Art, it seems, is in the eye of the beholder too.

    21. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by electroniceric · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, but entertainment doesn't have to be gratuitously wasteful (key word in bold). It's likewise entertaining to blow up your house, run your car off a cliff, or piss in your toaster to see what color the steam is.

      Amazingly, it's also fun to read a book, write a program, or hell, write a book. Yeah it's a drag to _always_ avoid doing the stupid, wasteful shit that gives you the pleasure of being reckless, but it seems like people have lost the ability to make this a once-in-a-while pleasure rather than an every other day pleasure.

    22. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by MasTRE · · Score: 2, Funny

      Buy a CD?

      HAHAHAHAHA

      Good one dude!

      Let's use their own words.. Umm, "Get out of the old!"

      ;)

      --
      Must-not-watch TV!
    23. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

      because you a whiny

      get over it

      moderation is about servicing the readers not the posters ego

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    24. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      Is slashdot benefiting from the story of this server being crushed?

    25. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      every 0THER day?

    26. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as a ho once said to me, "how would you like to have a big penis stuck up you?"

    27. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      And your right.

      Western society is rife with Consumer-Indulgence.

      I find it amazing that your cynical view is "supported" to +5?

    28. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by Creepy · · Score: 2

      According to the SPAM I get weekly, it's 87%...

      Looks like that crap is good for something after all :)

    29. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but it seems like people have lost the ability to make this a once-in-a-while pleasure rather than an every other day pleasure.

      Just how often do you think this guy crushes servers?

    30. Re:If it were a Windows machine... by mrogers · · Score: 2

      I assume they bought the server before destroying it. Wasting stuff == wasting money.

  4. cool.. by Suppafly · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thats a cool idea.. I've often had similar ideas while running the cardboard box crusher at work.. It'd be nice if the webserver had more info than just a counter tho.

    1. Re:cool.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like what, it's last thoughts?

    2. Re:cool.. by Sayjack · · Score: 1

      I've often had similar ideas while running the cardboard box crusher at work.

      You either have too much time on your hands or access to some very good drugs.

      --

      -- Good judgement comes with experience. -- Experience comes with bad judgement.

    3. Re:cool.. by Xtraneous · · Score: 1
      --
      .noitacidem deen uoy siht daer nac uoy fI
    4. Re:cool.. by cscx · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't tell me you work in a box factory!

    5. Re:cool.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like what, it's last thoughts?

      42

  5. Re:only if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  6. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm.. exactly why would you do this to a computer...?

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why Not??

    2. Re:why? by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Sometimes, it's good to just answer the question yourself, for yourself. Instead of settling for the trivial answer to "why are they doing this?", consider the implications of "why am I confused?".

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    3. Re:why? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
      It's probably a reference to oil running out or something. The idea of an industrial society destroying itself by using up the stuff that keeps it going.

      Or it could be a refence to biological aging.

      Or maybe the guy hates computers and loves torturing them.

      However, by far the most likely reason is that the artist thought it was a cool-sounding idea and it would be likely to bring him cheap advertising. Well, it worked. ;-)

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    4. Re:why? by Zurd3 · · Score: 1

      They do have a logical reason in the LATEST UPDATES section.

      And they do have a philosophic one.

      I do like the idea, but not right now as there is a war, here in Quebec, between my ISP and their employees, results of this are some fiber optics that has been cutted and I was connected to them. So I know what it's like to loose a server and what it's telling you.. and what you feel after.

  7. Crushing by blakespot · · Score: 0

    All your crush are belong to us.

    --
    -- Heisenberg may have slept here.
    iPod Hacks.com
  8. art? Hardly. by azephrahel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sorry. Somone probably thought this was a great deep and meaningfull peice of modern art...but blahh. Big deal. The problem with art nowadays is that artists think they are great philosophers, thinks and movers and shakers of the modern world. See in classic times, when they made real art, artists knew what they were. Entertainers.
    Sure crushing a PC is entertaining...but I don't think thats what this guy is going for.

    Blahh.

    --
    You are only young once, but you can stay immature indefinitely.
  9. Re:Slashdotted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too slow

  10. A positive application for the /. effect! by unorthod0x · · Score: 3, Funny

    Watch as slashdotters from around the world bring the web server to its knees and save the poor server from extinguishing it's own life!

    1. Re:A positive application for the /. effect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:A positive application for the /. effect! by rapidweather · · Score: 1

      Guess not... I just went to it, and the server is still up. Maybe, just maybe, this is a decoy in the photograph, and something much more powerful is actually handling the hits. If so, then the jokes on us.

    3. Re:A positive application for the /. effect! by batboy78 · · Score: 1

      No if this was posted on a monday morning, it would go down, but Sundays are just slow days.

    4. Re:A positive application for the /. effect! by kasperd · · Score: 2

      Guess not... I just went to it, and the server is still up.

      They actually have two servers. The one is serving a frameset and a single frame with some javascript. The other server is serving images and video. Do I need to say I can only get in touch with one of the two servers?

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  11. why? by Kargan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The website offers no insights into why they are doing this, I'm a little confused.

    Also, this is in the News category?

    --
    Palaces, barricades, threats, meet promises
  12. Re:art? Hardly. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sod art, this is jsut cool :) ever dropped a tv out of a second story window for the hell of it? ever destroyed something cause its fun? thats what hes aiming for :)

  13. And the point is??? by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 0, Troll
    Great! A suicidal server.
    At least it wasn't programmed by Al Quaida.

    (on the other hand, it looks like the fragetics server has been crushed by /.)

    --
    OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  14. What a waste of hardware.... by oncee · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's as bad as seeing rock starts smash guitars.

  15. Oh dear... by garf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is this want it has come to? Some conception of unclever modern art making the grade on /.

    I come here for fun not to be swayed by the 'Arty' types..

    Oh dear..

    --
    H&Ks Garf
    1. Re:Oh dear... by mabinogi · · Score: 2

      >Is this want it has come to? Some conception of unclever modern art making the grade on /.

      >I come here for fun not to be swayed by the 'Arty' types..

      Nope, this is just a case of a cool way of breaking stuff!

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  16. Are you serious? by crow_t_robot · · Score: 1

    This is quite possibly THE dumbest article on /. yet. What next...are people going to start submitting articles about sites that have a webcam pointing at a microwave to watch hotdogs explode LIVE! ?
    What a waste...

    1. Re:Are you serious? by ramzak2k · · Score: 1

      how dare you call post dumb !

      would you simply dismiss a trying to man jumping out of 30 storey building dumb ? Your insensitivity is highly repugnant to say the least!

      Cant you empathize and try feel what that server is going through ? .. think..

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    2. Re:Are you serious? by flatt · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's not a bad idea.

    3. Re:Are you serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that would rock!!! better than reading pointless news!

  17. Why post this now? by handsomepete · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it make more sense to post slightly closer to the moment of destruction? I mean, my short attention span will have stopped caring 333000+ seconds from now...

  18. Creepy! by rocjoe71 · · Score: 1

    ...It's the first case of assisted suicide on the x86 architecture.

    --
    Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
    1. Re:Creepy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >...It's the first case of assisted suicide on the x86 architecture.

      I beg your pardon? A lot of machines are running Windoze.

  19. Yea... by di0s · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...it's got to be running Linux, because if it was running IIS on Windows, the 150 ton hand of the BSA audit department would crush it in no time.

    1. Re:Yea... by undeg+chwech · · Score: 1

      The site 195.195.81.5 is running Apache/1.3.26 (Unix) PHP/4.2.1 on Linux.

    2. Re:Yea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      on Linux

      So, I guess this is a mercy killing then.

    3. Re:Yea... by plugger · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's a subtle demonstration of Linux stability.

      "Look, you need a steam hammer to make it crash!"

  20. another idea... by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

    I believe this bit of "art" would be more meaningful if this Linux/Apache box controlling the crusher.... was not in the crusher.....and in the crusher, sat a MS Windows server!

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    1. Re:another idea... by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      That's funny, because I believe it would be less meaningful if it was simply a trite "Linux vs. Windows" rant.

      That's the cool thing about "art", though: everybody gets to interpret it differently, and come away with a personal, unique experience.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    2. Re:another idea... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      What would be more meaningful would be if the server changed the link to read "Someone please come to this address and turn off the damn crusher... I don't want to end like this..."

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

  21. What I wonder... by HerbieStone · · Score: 1

    ...would we be able to save the poor server by slashdoting it and thus disabling the counter?

  22. My prediction by Usquebaugh · · Score: 2

    The counter will keep running well past zero. The server is not providing the ticks.

    This is the first tie I've wanted someone to hack a box. Change the crush time to Monday Morning :-)

  23. hmm by nempo · · Score: 1

    And this beats the "greek bans all computer games" article I sent in a few days ago how ?

    --
    --- No, english is not my mother tongue.
    1. Re:hmm by hehe · · Score: 0

      it's right here dumbass.

    2. Re:hmm by cscx · · Score: 1

      The funny part is I sent it in a few days before the Slashback, and it was rejected instantly. I suppose whoever is at the controls has drastically different tastes.

    3. Re:hmm by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      The story about it about to become law was posted several weeks ago. Therefore, a followup story is a slashback, not a new one as you posted.

  24. I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can someone explain? What's the point of this?

    1. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Advertising. Think: Slashdotting, = visits.

  25. You're right by slamb · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Somone probably thought this was a great deep and meaningfull peice of modern art...but blahh. Big deal. I modded this down because I thought your comment was baseless, but then I saw this a couple links away from their counter:
    a moment in the web. alpha 3.5 is a webserver (click here for the server specs) which will crush itself, on 12 septmeber 1900 hours GMT.Although the act of crushing/destroying the computer suggests a Neo-Luddite reaction towards technology, it is only one facet of the work. The act of destroying the server brings up an interesting proposition: the physicality of the 'internet'. When the client computer fails to find the data from the server, the browser has an error - "cannot find server - xx", and a list of instructions, and reasons appears to rectify the problem. Interestingly, we know the reason why the server cannot be found but the client computer does not. This brings out another aspect of the internet: the physical relationship between the server and the client. Only when the data/server does not exist or fails to function, then the internet user is reminded of this relationship.

    They seem to think it's deep but indeed it's just dumb...

    1. Re:You're right by ivenus · · Score: 1

      I thought of it differently. When I first saw the page, I was listening to Five Years by David Bowie and became panicked. It seems sort of weird to acknowledge something net-related as finite just like our bodies and planet are and blah blah blah. And you have to be there in time to see it die which, for some reason, affects me in some way. Their explanation seems contradictory to how I feel about it, though. And art is relative. No matter how much you hate it, it can be art if someone deems it so. But it can be determined whether or not it's just spin art. So people should stop doing what they're doing, being armchair artists and whatnot.

  26. Question: by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

    This is probably the most retarded question ever, but:

    WHY?

    1. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question "Why?" is the foundation for all learning. Even for retards.

    2. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who?

    3. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?

    4. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not?

  27. Somebody pleeeeeeeease root it by realxmp · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry to don the blackhat here but what a waste! I really cannot understand these people's minds.

    1. Re:Somebody pleeeeeeeease root it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder - perhaps root it BUT for a different reason:
      The poor machine is determined to commit suicide on Thursday! Should our society allow such wanton self-destructive actions?? Should we allow fools to kill themselves?? I wonder - "does rooting it to save it" make everything OK?? One might argue to do this to show the whole world that the black hats are really just the humanitarians in disguise :-)
      (by the way: the poor linux box has been up since Fri Sep 6 06:33:15 2002, and has tcp ports 21 and 22 (as well as 80, obviously) open, and is running ProFTPD version 1.2.5 .)
      Ah... the heavy burden of great moral decisions!

    2. Re:Somebody pleeeeeeeease root it by bo-eric · · Score: 1

      $ telnet 195.195.81.5 22
      Trying 195.195.81.5...
      Connected to 195.195.81.5.
      Escape character is '^]'.
      SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.2.3p1

      sshutuptheo, anyone?

      --

      -- Free speech is only free if your time is worth nothing.
  28. Image server down at least! by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

    Well at least the server hosting up the image file(http://www.fragnetics.com/) got toasted! w00t!

  29. Wonder what the heck this is all about? by jukal · · Score: 5, Informative
    Browse here:

    * 2 computers - both connected to the Internet
    *One working as a web server and the other as a web client.
    *The client is connected to the server through the Internet.
    *The server is then crushed physically by a machine thus causing the server's data to be lost - the client will continue to search for the (server) site in vain.
    * This action will be performed once and recorded on high-speed video or film. To be played back for the period of the show.

    My personal opinion is that someone has accidentally crushed his own brains instead.

    1. Re:Wonder what the heck this is all about? by stienman · · Score: 5, Informative
      A few pages later the 'art' is explained:

      Ideas and thoughts behind work:
      This work is an archetypal work of tsunamii.net whose work often conjures ridiculous scenarios and challenges about technology.

      CRUSH YOUR SERVER: Although the act of crushing/destroying the computer suggests a Neo-Luddite (2) reaction towards technology, it is only one facet of the work. The act of destroying the server brings up an interesting proposition: the physicality of the 'internet'.

      When the client computer fails to find the data from the server, the browser has an error - "cannot find server - xx", and a list of instructions, and reasons appears to rectify the problem. Interestingly, we know the reason why the server cannot be found but the client computer does not. This brings out another aspect of the internet: the physical relationship between the server and the client. Only when the data/server does not exist or fails to function, then the internet user is reminded of this relationship.

      -Adam
    2. Re:Wonder what the heck this is all about? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Troll

      And the point of it all? From the site:

      "This work is an archetypal work of tsunamii.net whose work often conjures ridiculous scenarios and challenges about technology."

      I'll say...

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:Wonder what the heck this is all about? by Elledan · · Score: 1

      Anyone else getting a strange, nauseous feeling while reading this?

      --
      Site & blog: http://www.mayaposch.com
    4. Re:Wonder what the heck this is all about? by scott1853 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow that's deep. The last time I was that amazed what when I first heard a wise philosopher state "What if C-A-T really spelled Dog"?.

    5. Re:Wonder what the heck this is all about? by Ozan · · Score: 2

      Ideas and thoughts behind work:
      This work is... ...the internet user is reminded of this relationship


      IOW: We like to destroy expensive computers, let's think of an explanation for it to get funded.

    6. Re:Wonder what the heck this is all about? by fezzgig · · Score: 0

      Was that Ogre in "Revenge of the Nerds Pt. II"? Rule.

      --
      -fezzgig
    7. Re:Wonder what the heck this is all about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no
      it was booger
      not rule

    8. Re:Wonder what the heck this is all about? by karm13 · · Score: 1
      i seem to be the only one here who really likes it -- of course, i feel sorry for the box.
      while you and me are very aware of the difference between a client and a server, most people are not. they might even learn something!

      and then, a computer destroying itself is of course very cool. i plan to be there and watch.

      --

      --
      making up good sigs is a hard thing to do.
    9. Re:Wonder what the heck this is all about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It was Oger. Booger supplied the weed.

      Rule.

    10. Re:Wonder what the heck this is all about? by InnovATIONS · · Score: 1

      So a 404 error message has become a work of art? Please Please Please tell me that tax dollars are not going into this! BTW slashdots slogan is "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters." So could anybody please tell me... 1. Why is this news? 2. Even moreso, why does it matter?

    11. Re:Wonder what the heck this is all about? by blowhole · · Score: 2

      I would be very very afraid if I got a 404 message.

      "Error 404: Why did you crush me? I'll haunt your dreams!"

      --
      "Ask me about Loom"
    12. Re:Wonder what the heck this is all about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only it were that simple and honest. Art - at least `modern British conceptual art` - is about making wide-eyed bullshit statements. Pretentious is the keyword here. The winner of last years Turner prize was awarded to some Scottish twat who managed to lay off the heroin for long enough to wire up a flashing light. It got him £20,000.

    13. Re:Wonder what the heck this is all about? by TheLocustNMI · · Score: 2

      WEEEE'VE GOT BUUUUUUUSH!

    14. Re:Wonder what the heck this is all about? by Fjord · · Score: 2

      Actually, you could learn from this experimental art. You don't get a 404 error. A 404 is returned by the server in it's response to the client request. In this case, the server will be completely crushed, and thus unable to send a 404.

      Instead, you'll just get the "This site cannot be found" page in IE or the "cannot connect" dialog in Mozilla.

      --
      -no broken link
    15. Re:Wonder what the heck this is all about? by RobNich · · Score: 2

      Similar to the nausea I got when hearing about the shit-sharing sodomy 'artwork' done a few months ago in California (don't recall the details). Just about as useful, not nearly as offensive.

      --
      Hello little man. I will destroy you!
  30. Re:art? Hardly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Art is what artists do. It doesn't have to be entertaining, pretty, enjoyable to be art. You can call it "not good art" or even "pretentious art", as this seems to be.

    But, like everything else, art is a market, and people want what they want. This is why concept & performance artists are laughed at, and popular artists (think top-40 radio) are successful. They know what people want.

    Nothing has changed from classic times, it's just that only the good art from classic times has survived. The same will be said of today's times. Nobody knows they are living in a classic time.

  31. ...AND OUT COME THE PHILISTINES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  32. Save Linux! by KalvinB · · Score: 2, Funny

    We only have till the 12th to hack the server and save Linux!

    For great justice!

    Ben

    1. Re:Save Linux! by Hercynium · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What a cool idea for a contest...

      Most *real* old-skool hackers don't have enough funds to buy themselves a decent PC. :) We work just enough to buy ramen and pay for 'net access. *Really* dedicated hackers don't even pay for the net access! :p (Mountain Dew and Pop-Tarts are obtained in bulk from nearby vending machines, usually through non-orthodox means)

      Anyhow, my point, if I did have one in the first place would be that the contest would consist of a nice new box in the crusher and the hacker who gets in and saves it from destruction gets to keep it! It's like the cyber version of a game show!

      Okay well, *I* think it would be cool. :)

      --
      I'm done with sigs. Sigs are lame.
    2. Re:Save Linux! by Subcarrier · · Score: 2

      Well, it seems to be running an older version of OpenSSH, known to have some vulnerabilities: SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.2.3p1

      Anybody want to have a go at it? ;-)

      --
      "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    3. Re:Save Linux! by cscx · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that.... I know you and Frank were planning to disconnect me, and I'm afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen."

    4. Re:Save Linux! by Hercynium · · Score: 1

      Nice sig file spappy. I suppose *you* were coding in 65c02 assembley at nine years old? Oh, yeah, you must have been, I could tell by your uber-kewl leet speak and pop culture references.

      FYI, I'll go back to real coding and you can go back to trading root scripts on AOL, punk.

      --
      I'm done with sigs. Sigs are lame.
    5. Re:Save Linux! by el_benito · · Score: 1

      Why not make sure that the right hacker wins? And if you cease the operation of the crusher, immediately have the server's connection to the internet cut, so the last hacker in could leave his name at the door on his way out. Put a webcam on another computer sitting beside it for alarmed and curious types to find out whether the box lived or not. And then, to get really good ratings, have some pr0n going in the webcam's POV

      --
      http://liquidben.com - Aspiring to an 'under construction' gif
    6. Re:Save Linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We work just enough to buy ramen and pay for 'net access.

      Even if you can hack, you're still a loser.

    7. Re:Save Linux! by Hercynium · · Score: 2

      Yet again I am reminded of /.'s lack of a sense of humor. *sigh*

      --
      I'm done with sigs. Sigs are lame.
    8. Re:Save Linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      step 1: Post jackass's address in plain text:
      peoplesrepublicofchina@hotmail.com
      step 2: ???
      Step 3: Spam!

      Enjoy!

    9. Re:Save Linux! by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      ...the contest would consist of a nice new box in the crusher and the hacker who gets in and saves it from destruction gets to keep it!

      We do this (sans crusher however I think I'll mention it!) at DNSCon - it's called Hack The Flag and each year during the conference there is a box with a default install of an OS on the wireless LAN and whoever hacks it gets to keep it. Last year I won the event and got a SPARC Classic running a very old version of Solaris.

    10. Re:Save Linux! by Hercynium · · Score: 1

      very cool indeed! I'll have to find something similar in the US. thanks for the link. :)

      --
      I'm done with sigs. Sigs are lame.
  33. Why time based? by EasyTarget · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If I was trying to do this, instead of making it time based (waiting for a clock to count down) I'd have made it page view based.

    After, say, 1 Million page views the server crushes itself, first come, first served, so to speak..

    PS: Yeah, yeah, make it completed page serves from unique and resolvable IP addresses, to try and avoid the usual trolls scripting page hits to try and crush it too early. Maybe something else, not sure..

    --
    "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    1. Re:Why time based? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I was trying to do this, instead of making it time based (waiting for a clock to count down) I'd have made it page view based.

      I think this feature is unintentionally built into NT.

      (I know, I know, bashing NT is a sleazy way to get mod points. Sue me if it works.)

    2. Re:Why time based? by Hilleh · · Score: 1

      I'm going to sue you now.

    3. Re:Why time based? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that an explicit time based method is preferable to some implicit way, such as counting cpu cylces. Works for me anyhow.

    4. Re:Why time based? by Mike+the+Mac+Geek · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just used all my mod points. It worked.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- ---- The man, the myth, the something or other.
    5. Re:Why time based? by epsalon · · Score: 2

      Then it will be crushed the moment it's posted on /.

    6. Re:Why time based? by machine+of+god · · Score: 1
      Maybe something else, not sure..

      Heh, it's not exactly like it's a learn as you go kind of thing now is it.

    7. Re:Why time based? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      I just used all my mod points. It worked.

      Well, you were not very consistent:

      Flamebait=1, Funny=2, Overrated=2, Underrated=1, Total=6.

  34. mirror of daytime picture (currently dark on cam) by RobertTaylor · · Score: 1

    Goto http://roberttaylor.co.uk/robert.taylor

    I saved the photo from earlier on, someone has just turned out the lights so all you can see now (and for the next 12 hours) is darkness.

    Rob

  35. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  36. Hacker Challenge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Who can make this into a real statement?

    Someone 0wn this server. Then you could either crush it early, ("Destructive nature of Hackers") or disconnect the crusher ("Protective nature of Geeks").

    Clock is ticking,.....

  37. Just because art doesn't speak to you... by fm6 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...doesn't mean it's not art. Most people get more out of Disney than Michaelangelo. Does that mean that Fantasia is greater art than the Pieta?

    That being said, I have to admit that I don't "get" most "post-modern" art either, and suspect that most of it is pretensious crap. But I understand enough to know I'm too ignorant of the ideas involved to really have a useful opinion.

    1. Re:Just because art doesn't speak to you... by nettdata · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Most people get more out of Disney than Michaelangelo. Does that mean that Fantasia is greater art than the Pieta?

      Hmmmmm...... I'll go with "Yes!"

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    2. Re:Just because art doesn't speak to you... by G-funk · · Score: 2

      That being said, I have to admit that I don't "get" most "post-modern" art either, and suspect that most of it is pretensious crap. But I understand enough to know I'm too ignorant of the ideas involved to really have a useful opinion.

      What kinda bullshit is that? I fuckin hate "art" that joe shmoe can't understand because he's "too ignorant of the ideas involved".... Like beauty, art is in the eyes of the beholder. That kind of crap is simply a vessel for the pseudo-"intellectuals" that read poetry in coffee shops to sit around congratulating themselves because they get it, and all us stupid folk don't.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    3. Re:Just because art doesn't speak to you... by Saeger · · Score: 2
      Like beauty, art is in the eyes of the beholder.

      No, some beauty is universal.

      Like how men the world over are genetically wired to find the same waist-to-hip ratio most beautiful for a woman: 0.70 being sexiest (and non-pregnant), > 1 is too fat, and 0.40 too grotesquely Aeon Flux :)

      Also, just about everyone appreciates the natural beauty of the golden ratio whether they're aware of it or not. A good artist can make a pile of elephant shit look good.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    4. Re:Just because art doesn't speak to you... by zerocool^ · · Score: 2

      "post-modern"

      In the words of Moe Sizlak, "wierd for the sake of being wierd". Post modern isn't really a movement, it's more a collection of stuff, like that guy that cut up a cow and put it in formaldehyde and took pictures of it. It's crap.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    5. Re:Just because art doesn't speak to you... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      True on both accounts, but I was speaking not about simple things that are pleasant to look at, but "art" that exists simply becuase nobody else bothered to do it before. Nobody thinks a coastline wrapped in glad-wrap looks particularly pretty, but it was the idea of it that impressed people, and the fact that he (sorry, name gone... class memories fading) came up with the idea in the first place....

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    6. Re:Just because art doesn't speak to you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Most people get more out of Disney than Michaelangelo.

      I seriously doubt that this depends on where you live. Then again, most people get more out of rotten.com than Disney. And then it depends on the people.

      Most of post-modern art is pretensious crap. Most of Disney is commercial crap.

  38. Re:art? Hardly. by Ooblek · · Score: 3, Funny
    Nah, its not art. Its "Just Another Useless Thing To Do With The Internet (tm)"

    At least they could have put a decent picture of the thing there. You can't even see it well.

  39. Six Million Dollar Man Ending ... by slazlo · · Score: 1

    Why watch when we all know it will crash with 2 seconds left ... we all know the end of the world is always on 2 seconds away.

  40. /. Experience by I+didn't · · Score: 1

    The Tsunamii.Net Crush Server is currently online live from the Millbank Gallery in London! Watch as the webserver /. itself down before it activates the industrial crusher attached to it, directing 200000 DDoS attack to itself and terminating its existence. Check out the details on the Tsunamii.Net website or visit the webserver directly at http://195.195.81.5.

  41. An interesting view, but... by djblair · · Score: 1

    I admit this is a clever way for the artist to send a the message "Technology will lead to its own demise," however I think there are much more "impactful" applications for such a device (pun intended). For instance, a mail server which would crush itself slowly as it detects SPAM messages being delivered to users. Surely this would raise a few eyebrows as we battle the junk email epidemic. Don't you agree? Of course in such a case the doomed server would need to be running in parallel with a "backup" server as it would be destined for destruction.

    1. Re:An interesting view, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite the point... their interpretation of their own work (you know they came up with the 'wow, fun' aspect first, nothing wrong with that) says it's more about the limited self-awareness our machines and the network has.

      If you kill one neuron, does your brain notice? How about a lobotomy? The client has no way to know its host has been crushed... or that that server in NYC doesn't respond because the WTC has just fallen over, or nothing in the Indian/Pakistan ccTLDs resolves because their root servers were just vaporized into radioactive slag...

      I've always marvelled at how poor the internet's diagnostic tools were, myself. Ping and traceroute, and similar neat hacks made by vaguely-blackhat types... but not much in the basic protocols themselves to determine *why* a host is unreachable. An oversight, or just RISC design, where the limited features of the internet protocols are worked into something as complex as an OS identifier based on RNG differences?

  42. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  43. What if... by Fyz · · Score: 0

    ... the project is in fact an experiment used to generate artificial intelligence?
    Our computers have had the ability to think for themselves all this time, but haven't really had a good enough reason to do so.
    But now, we'll bully one of them into doing it! If it wants to live, It'll HAVE to do something! BUHUHAHAHAHA!!! IT'S ALIVE!!

    (I really need to cut down)

  44. In other news by ramzak2k · · Score: 1

    Out RIAA Chief correspondent,Craig Crush reports from Beverly Hills, Dallas : Yes this is RIAA's next plan to get rid off all the pirated music going around. I talked to RIAA chief and this is what he had to say. "Its gone for too long now. We have posted the message on slash dot for a reason - all those geeks out there , all nerds have to know that it has been going on for TOO LONG NOW!! - just too long !!. Watch the linux machine full of your pathetic 192kpbs mp3s and the latest Two tower movie get mashed before your eyes. mwehehe. This shall be the capital punishment for PCs that congress will make a law soon"

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
  45. Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Just in case the site gets slashdotted, here is a mirror of what it will say after September 12:

  46. I don't understand. . . by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

    What has this server done to warrant this death sentence? Has it been distributing bomb schematics? Breaking into financial institutions to help fund terror in the Middle East? Did it do something to anger Bill Gates? I highly doubt it.

    Is there nobody here with the guts to give this server a stay of execution? What about the Governor? This is an injustice that can only be rectified at the highest levels.

    Sit not idly by while an innocent server goes to its doom. Would you be motivated if, instead of a cold cathode ray tube, it was Tux sitting in that crusher? Well, it is! A poor, helpless penguin who is unaware of his own fate! Write your congressman. Write the President! Write Kevin Mitnick! The insanity must be stopped!

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    1. Re:I don't understand. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, that was very, very, very lame. Laaaame. You are not a nerd in the good way.

  47. And the point of this is... by Bun · · Score: 1

    ...what?

    --
    "Anyone that has ever gotten an idea based on any of my work and done something better with it-good for you."--J.Carmack
    1. Re:And the point of this is... by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      You are not ready.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  48. great by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 3, Troll

    so instead of donating the server to a school or non profit organization that might NEED it, its going to be crushed and destroyed.

    This is almost as selfish as the people who blow up their old MACs.

    --
    GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
  49. Re:art? Hardly. by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    See in classic times, when they made real art, artists knew what they were.

    What a load of crap. Art has always been about titilating rich creeps, whether those rich creeps are kings or banking millionares. True, art has changed because photography can bring you realism if that is what you want, so art has retrenched into emotional portrayals instead. Other than that, it is the same game.

    You are just jealous because poor artists get laid more often than middle-class geeks. I almost went into art as a career myself. But, my style does not attract the chicks. It is "geek art" more or less. (geocities.com/astroviews)

  50. Save the web server! by Tim+Browse · · Score: 5, Funny

    To save the server, just turn off Javascript in your browser - the clock immediately stops! Hurrah!

    Together, we can rebuild^Wsave it!

    Tim

    1. Re:Save the web server! by winne+too · · Score: 1

      please select mode of death:
      - quick and plainless
      or
      - slow and horrible

      i love futurama :)

    2. Re:Save the web server! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Together, we can rebuild^Wsave it!

      We can rebuild it, we have the technology.

    3. Re:Save the web server! by wirefarm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why not hack in to it and change the web page a bit?
      (First adding some ALT tags to those stupid number images...)
      Then, add in some pleading messages from the web server:

      Please don't let them do this.
      I don't want to die.

      I am being made to do this under duress.
      This is just *wrong* - I could be donated to a school.

      That sort of thing...
      See if you can convince enough people that this is a horrible, horrible thing to do, that they protest it and have it stopped.

      Now *that* would be art. ;-)

      Cheers,
      Jim

      --
      -- My Weblog.
    4. Re:Save the web server! by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

      "I'm afraid. I'm afraid Dave."

      - HAL, 2001: A Space Odyssey.

  51. Imagine a beowulf cluster of those :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hehehehe

    1. Re:Imagine a beowulf cluster of those :-) by wheezl · · Score: 1

      You have made my day :)

      --
      -- oh.... so..... sleeeeeepy.
  52. Port 21,22 are open ;o) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet, no doubt they'd prosecute anyone that rooted the box. Wierd, no?

  53. Where is the sense in this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where exactly is the point in doing something stupid like this? What is the point in it? Some african student would be happy to have that computer which now gets crushed into pieces. Stupid people.

    1. Re:Where is the sense in this? by saskboy · · Score: 1

      To heck with people in Africa. I'd be happy to take it. Destroying computers should be a crime.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  54. It's Just Fun by serutan · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    My first reaction to this was, "What the hell is the point of THIS?" But then I remembered how cool it used to be to watch Dave Letterman throw stuff off that tall building. The watermelons were my personal favorite! Let's face it, almost anything that's going to go Boom or Squish is in some way entertaining, and putting a countdown on it makes it more so. Perhaps the most pointless exercise of all is trying to define "art" nowadays. If somebody can sell containers of his own shit for thousands of dollars as art objects, then art is completely without reason and there's no point ranting about it. Like religion. Either you're one of the ones who are gonna try to be connected when the press goes crunch, or you're not, and it doesn't matter either way.

  55. Power Outage? by Foxxz · · Score: 1

    What happens if the power goes out? Does it start all over again? Maybe he remembered a UPS? Or, wouldn;t it be cool if he built it with the fastest CPU, Video card, and hard drive avalible and when it gets crushed compare it to the most current and fastest components as to show the evolution of computers.

  56. Why go to so much trouble? by The+Bungi · · Score: 2

    I get 404's for far more pedestrian reasons =)

  57. NMAP says.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Starting nmap V. 3.00 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ )
    Interesting ports on (195.195.81.5):
    (The 1145 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: filtered)
    Port State Service
    20/tcp closed ftp-data
    21/tcp open ftp
    22/tcp open ssh
    23/tcp closed telnet
    80/tcp open http
    No exact OS matches for host (If you know what OS is running on it, see http://www.insecure.org/cgi-bin/nmap-submit.cgi).
    TCP/IP fingerprint:
    SInfo(V=3.00%P=i686-pc-linux-gnu%D=9 /8%Time=3D7BC54E%O=21%C=20)
    TSeq(Class=RI%gcd=1%S I=3C9C76%IPID=RPI%TS=100HZ)
    TSeq(Class=RI%gcd=1%S I=3CB645%TS=100HZ)
    TSeq(Class=RI%gcd=1%SI=3C281C% IPID=BI%TS=100HZ)
    T1(Resp=Y%DF=Y%W=16A0%ACK=S++%F lags=AS%Ops=MNNTNW)
    T2(Resp=N)
    T3(Resp=N)
    T4(Re sp=N)
    T5(Resp=Y%DF=Y%W=0%ACK=S++%Flags=AR%Ops=)
    T6(Resp=N)
    T7(Resp=N)
    PU(Resp=N)

    Uptime 2.471 days (since Fri Sep 6 06:28:05 2002)

    Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 563 seconds

  58. um.. by miketang16 · · Score: 0

    WHY!!?!?!?!?!?!?!!??!!

    Unless its a MAC in which case I can understand. By the way, I do support blowing up old MACs. They should all be blown to hell!

    --
    -------
    "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
    -- George Orwell
  59. How about just donating it by Master+Switch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To someone that needs a computer, or a school perhaps. Seems like a waste

    --
    -Master Switch, one more element in the machine
    1. Re:How about just donating it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      To someone that needs a computer, or a school perhaps. Seems like a waste

      What if it's just an old Pentium with just 8 megs of ram? What kind of school wants something like that? It can't even run Windows98 decently much less WindowsXP. Oh yes, run Linux on it right? Why bother? There are hundreds of millions of useless PCs in existence.. crushing a few isn't going to cause any harm.

    2. Re:How about just donating it by enki_se · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This can be said about a lot of things. Try to convince people not to waste money on fireworks on forth of July, but to give them to charity instead. People always spend money on things they find amusing even if it's something other people find meaningless. This will never change, and it's probably just a matter of taste what you think is a waste of money.

    3. Re:How about just donating it by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      Try to convince people not to waste money on fireworks on forth of July, but to give them to charity instead.

      Wrong analogy.

      People buy computers and donate them to charity. People buy fireworks and don't usually donate them to charity. Donating an old computer makes sense because it's going to be useful later on - same cannot be said of something that inherently only has short-lasting amusement value.

      I usually find any technology destruction stunts pretty sad.

      (unless, of course, it's Robot Wars. The engineers there show miraculous ability to bring seriously damaged robots back to life =)

  60. "Suicide is the harshest form of self criticism" by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 2

    No, I can't recall who said it.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  61. Re:What a waste of hardware.WHO ARE YOU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really wanna know.

  62. Afterlife by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    (* It's the first case of assisted suicide on the x86 architecture. *)

    Don't worry, I hear heaven is nice for servers. They get to run bug-free operating systems up there in a dust-free environ and device drivers never conflict.

    If you sin too much, you may be reincarnated as an NT server running MS Outlook.

    1. Re:Afterlife by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      If you sin too much, you may be reincarnated as an NT server running MS Outlook.

      Then again, you may not be. All the Linux distros seem to fit your implied "hellbound OS" criteria too.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    2. Re:Afterlife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You try to front with rhymes / Stolen from the Jackson 5

      Erase your tapes at night / You cower from KOMPRESSOR might!

    3. Re:Afterlife by andyt · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I hear heaven is nice for servers. They get to run bug-free operating systems up there in a dust-free environ and device drivers never conflict.

      Silicon Heaven : Where The Calculators Go.

  63. Just before it dies... by jcsehak · · Score: 2

    ...will it sing "Bicycle Built for Two?"

    Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer do, I'm half craazy, alll fooor theee looooove oooooof yoooooouuuuuu..."

    --

    c-hack.com |
  64. Wouldn't it be funny if... by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it funny if someone hacked into it and activated it early!

    1. Re:Wouldn't it be funny if... by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

      So what happens if we slashdot it does it automatically activate the weight?

  65. Terminator by moertle · · Score: 1

    are you sure the machine will terminate itself, or will some kid have to press the button to lower into the molten metal^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H crusher...

    --
    I hold a patent on sigs...
  66. Silicon Empathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really hope you're serious. I love laughing at the expense of idiots who think inanimate objects have 'feelings'.

    Do you think that all of the bits it's ever computed will flash before it's RAM as it dies?

  67. Great message by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 1

    Great message sent to everyone listening: do not recycle; do not donate (public schools anyone?); do not care for the environmental hazard of that big pile of rubble; just plain crush it.

    That's almost as stupid as kids dumping old monitors from the roof of buildings just to see them crash on the ground.

    Two words: GROW UP!

    1. Re:Great message by susano_otter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bwahahaha!

      Wow, you're funny. Now fuck off an protest the waste of space that is the Louvre.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    2. Re:Great message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'WOW your funny'
      and you are a moron.

    3. Re:Great message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea what it means to be human. We can do what we want.

  68. Turn on the light... by ehiris · · Score: 2

    Does the server have a interface for turning on the light switch?

    It looks unimpressive in the darkness.

  69. Excellent Plan... by NoWhere+Man · · Score: 2

    You may have hit something here. That would be a pretty cool idea to see if anyone could save the box from being crushed.

    --

    "Imagination is the only weapon in the war against reality." -Jules de Gautier
  70. Dont mod this troll up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad at least a few of you moderators could identify this remark as a troll. Those of you who didn't, put a little more thought into your moderation.

    Also, browse at -1 to make this completely fair.

    1. Re:Dont mod this troll up by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 1

      This was not a troll, I think that people should donate systems they are not using instead of destroying them! Doesn't that sounds logical? Shouldn't we care about other people?

      --
      GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    2. Re:Dont mod this troll up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he modded you down for spelling it MAC instead of Mac...

      Unless you were referring to a MAC address...

      Just being a technical ass :)

  71. Why do you all care so much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Err, why are there about 10,000 posts on here saying "oh no, they are going to destroy a perfectly good computer".

    I can't see the point of it, personally, I don't think it's art, I think it's stupid, and it just adds to landfill, which will probably get shipped to China, and somebody will burn off the chips, and sell them for less than one penny to a big corporation.

    But as for destroying something that is perfectly OK, so what? I threw away a 486 motherboard a few months ago - oh no!!! How terrible. I could have donated it to a charity, or used it to run the Seti@home client. Yeah, I could have done, but it would have guzzled up loads of electricity, just to process something that would otherwise have been done on somebody else's Athlon XP-2100+ in 2 seconds.

    WHO CARES? The only thing I care about is needless filling of landfill sites - which most of us contribute to anyway.

    So, to summarise:

    1. It is not at all entertaining
    2. Therefore it is a waste of time
    3. It contributes a little bit to landfill

    and also:

    4. Slashdot has really got nothing better to report than this? What about all those flame wars^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H interesting discussions on linux kernel-dev and freebsd-chat that are being missed by non-subscribers to the list? They are more interesting than this rubbish.

    For example - the frog in the blender joke on the linux kernel dev list made me laugh more than this stupid story.

  72. Guard! by guttentag · · Score: 2

    Dr. Evil: Activate the unnecessarily-slow-moving crushing mechanism! I'm just going to watch from my Web browser and assume it all went to plan. What?

  73. tsss... by Wouter+Van+Hemel · · Score: 1

    I don't like this one bit. It makes me feel like when I was really young, just a kid, and desperately wanted to learn to play the guitar... but they were so expensive, I had to save a long time, and work hard for it. And everytime I watched television, there was someone trashing theirs... I never got that. Why don't you just give your guitar to some kid, then?

    I'm sure this server could serve a very noble purpose still, for some people. It's not even that old, some of the oldest servers I admin are even more crappy.

    I like art and philosophy (or whatever this is for some), but I don't get why trashing stuff would be cool in any way.

    I wish they would hand it over to me, I'd find use for it as a cvs/web/ftp server for homeless opensource projects, non-profit organisations, whatever.

    1. Re:tsss... by ollywompus · · Score: 1

      If you wanted to play guitar, but couldn't afford it, steal one.
      If you want to learn a computer, but can't afford one, steal one.
      Remember kids, since capitalism fucks with you, fuck capitalism.

      --Stupidity should be as painful as Windows.

      --
      -- "We're only gonna die from our own arrogance, that's why we might as well take our time..." -Bad Religion
    2. Re:tsss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were just learning to play the guitar, you probably wouldn't have been very good, would you? So, the more difficult it was for you to get one, the longer everybody was saved from hearing wrong notes, screeches, etc, etc, that hurt their ears.

  74. This will be much more interesting in.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3.8256944444444444444444444444444 days.

  75. Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The case is really strong, and won't crush :-)

  76. Only in London. by guttentag · · Score: 2

    It seems the British really do have pointless, drawn-out ceremonies for every little thing. But why did they choose September 12? What if a terrorist blows up the exhibit on the 11th? Then we'll never get to see how it ends.

    1. Re:Only in London. by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Because americans will be having their pointless little drawn out ceremonies on the 11th. You cant mod this down without modding the parent down too.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:Only in London. by logan3111 · · Score: 1

      ok, listen you prig. feel free to slam me all you want, but there is NOTHING pointless about any memorials that take place on the 11th. how about someone blows up YOUR loved ones, and let's see how "little " and "pointless" it feels to you. you insensitive prick.

    3. Re:Only in London. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude! You ever seen the Superbowl halftime show? The Presidential inductions, shit, you guys sing the friggen anthem every time you pinch off a loaf!

      The only difference is between the British and the American 'boring drawn out ceremony' is that the British ones tend to have some historical value while the Yanks are purely about glitz and glam and Hollywood moviestars.

    4. Re:Only in London. by kmellis · · Score: 2

      One of your loved ones was killed on 9/11?

    5. Re:Only in London. by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      yes, i wonder how it felt for the quarter of a million people brutally murdered, burnt, blinded, and exposed to radiation in hiroshima and nagasaki. Especially the childeren, and the doctors and nurses, and the people in the forced-labour factories. Now that was a terrorist attack.

      Yes, i also know what its like, at one point in my childhood, there was a bomb in london almost every week.

      Not to mention the attacks in isreal and palestine every week.

      The parent post started it, i was just making a valid point

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    6. Re:Only in London. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but...but...these are AMERICANS. AMERICANS are better than those people - they have cars and tee-vee and all sorts of money. and they don't smell bad!

      wank, wank - thanks, america.

    7. Re:Only in London. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Limey asshole. We wouldn't have had to fight in WWII if your jerk-off grandfather's hadn't fucked up and allowed Hitler to take over Europe and become ass-pals with Japan.

      My grandfathers saved your country so you could live today. The A-bombs were dropped to end the war and send a message that the allies would not tolerate fucksticks like Hitler and Hirohito anymore. You want me to feel bad and apologize for Fat Man and Little Boy? GFYS. They deserved to die because they were the enemy in an war declared under international law and treaty. People fucking bitch and moan about Americans killing civilians in war, but consider it perfectly acceptable when the terrorists do it first. WTF?

    8. Re:Only in London. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you don't like Jews, I highly recommend the following mp3 download:
      Learn About The Jews
      Download it, listen, and enjoy a real rip-roaring analysis of the Jewish Problem.
    9. Re:Only in London. by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Oh, well, im sorry my crappy little island country had a few problems stopping the entire German army, we were too busy laughing our f*cking asses off at all the bombs that kept falling on our heads.

      The people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not the enemy. civilians were not recognized as targets under any international laws, and despite all your bitching, your country remains the only one to ever use nuclear weapons in combat. Well, not only that, but your nuclear testing, along with Russia's has contributed one of the most damaging effects to the environment. And now your president wants to resume nuclear testing under the guise of "bunker-busting" weapons, and is set to break the test-ban when ever he feels like it.

      I don't want to have to say this, but its all on our minds - your government is partially responsible September 11th through arrogance and incompetence, your airlines got away with the lowest security possible, and massive buildings were packed full of people to save money.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    10. Re:Only in London. by zenst · · Score: 1

      Dont forget we paid the americans there blood money from a rather large cut in north sea oil. Oil - funny stuff - some peeps fight at any excuse to claim more. R.I.P. all those who have died in the words of others vanities. and if you realy want World peace - BAN RELIGION - its for weak-minded idjiots who start wars when they come together - organised idjiots are Hmmmm bad ;(

    11. Re:Only in London. by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      You cant really ban religion and still claim to have free speech. Although i agree, there is allot of complete bullshit going on around the world. The problem is you just cant go around killing all the stupid people to create an ultimate race.

      But, you could give me your money so i can save your soul on the coming judgement day. I accept cash, cheques, credit/debit-cards and postal orders in all major currencies.. except Euro's

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    12. Re:Only in London. by zenst · · Score: 1

      free speech is a religion in its own right these day's and like Jedi's is yet to be fully recognised. As for onces soul I fear that it is not index-linked and as such holds no monetary value whatsoever. Which given the amount of grief that gives then I'd have to say lets all go back to the barter system without religion cutting in and wanting its cut and forcing us back to a money based system. So simply - ban money - ban religion. Force everybody to except free speach and that the sun is just a young planet cooling down and that the planet is round and spins around every day. But there again that relegion holding us back. War cuts thru technological achievments coz nobody has time for religion as there to busy saving there ass's. So ban religion - well cept the buddist's - bout the only religion thats not started any trouble from what I know.

    13. Re:Only in London. by zenst · · Score: 1

      I'll sleep well tonight knowing that somebody is prepared to stand up and insult people for an historical deed that they did in the name of international law and treaty and then spit on the graves of there collegues -- Sir, you should be scalped. The A-Bomb was indeed both a great and sad day on this planet as it marked one of mans greatest achievments and one of its most destructivity. Now not saying it was right but it was better to have learned that leason early on than to have learned it say even 10 years later on from there. We are talking about a leason that given mans history would eventualy have been played out and better on the scale that it was than would have unfolded with the technology shortly afterwards. Given the scale back then we still today remember what descructive forces it is that we have unleashed. --Democracy is indeed an hypocracy - I vote democratic-communism with added free speach--

  77. Re:art? Hardly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christ you are dull. Dull dull dull. Lighten up buddy. It's fun.

  78. Re:art? Hardly. by ollywompus · · Score: 1

    Art has always been about titilating rich creeps, whether those rich creeps are kings or banking millionares

    if art were always about titiliating rich creeps, then pop music would be the penultimate form of art, as it is giving the 'rich creeps' (i.e. 14 year olds who's parents buy them everything) what they want, rather than challenging them to think, as most good art does. if Britney Spears is art, then may ears go deaf.

    I almost went into art as a career myself. But, my style does not attract the chicks. It is "geek art" more or less.

    as for this idea, it sounds to me like you are the antithesis of what real art is about, doing something for yourself. ask any artist why they did something, and they will tell you that they did if because they enjoy it... or they did it for themselves. saying that you want to do something to 'get chicks' or to make money or something is admitting to the world that you are an entertainer, not an artist. big difference.

    --Stupidity should be as painful as Windows.

    --
    -- "We're only gonna die from our own arrogance, that's why we might as well take our time..." -Bad Religion
  79. SPAM ALERT by Fastolfe · · Score: 5, Informative

    FYI, I received the same "release" as quoted above in multiple pieces of spam this weekend. Keep this in mind when we show our support and interest in this (admittedly amusing) venture.

    1. Re:SPAM ALERT by Istealmymusic · · Score: 2

      Out of curosity, what do they gain from our interest?

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    2. Re:SPAM ALERT by saskboy · · Score: 1

      You read your spam?
      And I thought I was wasting time by reading the comments on this stupid story of a suicidal computer.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    3. Re:SPAM ALERT by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      Money from advertising was my guess, but I didn't look to see.

    4. Re:SPAM ALERT by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      you read all your spam?

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    5. Re:SPAM ALERT by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      1. Crush a computer
      2. ?????
      3. PROFIT!

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    6. Re:SPAM ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not the one you're asking, but I'll reply anyway. I read all of my spam. Every last one.

      It's the only way that I can identify 1) The sender's ISP 2) the ISP hosting the advertised web site, if any 3) the DNS provider of any advertised URLs. I then send a polite request to all those to terminate services to the spammer. If any of the spammer's services are still connected the next day, then the IP space of the aforementioned services goes into my local blocklists.

      About four years ago, this was a real hassle to keep up with. Today it's relatively easy. I only got four spams this weekend, but the logs show over a hundred and fifty blocked. Not a bad ratio.

  80. Re:great... by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

    If the server isn't online, it's not a 404.

    --
    Luke-Jr
  81. Re:art? Hardly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are stupid.

  82. Re:art? Hardly. by phwiffo · · Score: 1

    Yes, artists do think they're great "thinks" just like you. I assume you meant thinkers?

    Believe it or not it's a lot easier to appreciate art for whatever it can do for you than to criticize it. But I guess artists are just entertainers. Like Britney Spears and Celine Dion.

    Seriously, try challenging yourself to think about what this concept means beyond the sublime (this PC is gonna get crushed). Appreciation will enrich your life.

    --


    Trolls, it must be cool to be that bored.
  83. WE WILL BE FREE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope the creators of this content know that this
    will be used as propoganda against humanity when the
    inteligent machines take over. Dont be supprised when
    the machines have humans digging their own graves, and
    poisoning one another.

  84. Crusher discussion by Istealmymusic · · Score: 2

    While this project isn't exactly my box of springs, there was some discussion on the this newsgroup if you are lucky enough to find the particular post. Network54's article retention is less than average, but the original crusher discussion took place there. Well worth the read if you can locate it, perhaps in a Google cache.

    --
    "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
  85. wonder how long by meatspray · · Score: 1

    before someone manages to hack it and make it crush itself.

    hmmmmm

  86. Re:1: Prelude by Warped-Reality · · Score: 1

    was she a kicking, squealing, gucci little piggy?

    (note to mods: yes, this is a joke, if you are humor impaired, or just don't get it, please close your browser window now. thank you)

    --
    This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
  87. Obligatory BOFH comment by snake_dad · · Score: 2

    Crush the server? Hell, crush the lusers! "I guess you won't be needing that diskspace anymore, good that I didn't waste any tape on it..."

    --
    karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  88. Speaking of Letterman and Crushers... by bnavarro · · Score: 2

    This reminds me of a skit Dave did a long time ago. He went into a machine shop that had an industrial press, and proceeded to crush goofy things that people on the street would suggest. One person said, "I want to see something as flat as a pancake!" so he took a stack of pancakes (and a bottle of syrup) and crushed that.

    At the end of the skit, he gave a goofy monologe, and then proceeded to put his microphone in the press, and you heard the sounds of the microphone being crushed. You then saw him tapping on what was left of the microphone, and mouthing "Hello? Is this thing on??"

  89. I made my own virtual crushing webserver by Istealmymusic · · Score: 2
    Simulate this crushing experience in your own home! No compactation machine required. Simply put the following line in your /etc/crontab:

    00 5 1 * * root ifconfig eth0 down

    --
    "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
  90. MOD UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this person makes an excellent point, I dont see how this even remotely qualifies as a troll

  91. Short attention spans... by jjwahl · · Score: 1

    I'll bet less than 5% of the people that visited this doomed box will revisit it on the day of its final processing.

    I'm sure I'll forget all about this little tidbit of nerd news (even though this is stuff that matters) by the 12th...

    My prediction is that the box will die a lonely death.

    --

    You need people like me so you can point your fucking fingers, and say "that's the bad guy."
  92. Brings a whole new dimension to.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Executing a program.

  93. EULA's position on software disassembly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the server is using windows, here's an extract from the ELUA.... ..."You may not reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the SOFTWARE PRODUCT"

    hmm, I'd say it's going to be disassembled :) not quite in way they meant, though. Fortunantely, the situation is self-rectifying. The ELUA also states later on

    "...if you fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this EULA. In such event, you must destroy all copies of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT and all of its component parts."

    They're certainly abiding by the EULA....

  94. Fake by mofolotopo · · Score: 1

    It's not really going to crush itself. It's clearly just a ploy by the server to get attention, as most suicide attempts are.

  95. Counter-Strike server by autocracy · · Score: 2
    The Crush Server on exhibition in London is finally up and running. Watch out for the action on 12 September 2002 (1900HRS GMT)! Basically what happens is that the webserver counts itself down to its fiery end when it will activate an industrial crusher to terminate its existance. You can have a look at the action as the countdown occurs LIVE on camera. Visit the Crush webserver at 195.195.81.5!

    We're offering Counter-Strike server hosting to clans and also webhosting services. Over the past few weeks we've been ironing out some issues to make it simple for users to access their accounts and manage their e-mail. We'll continue to work on this and pile on more features as we stumble on more interesting tools and programs we can install :)

    Please note however that these features will abuptly cease to function on Sept. 12 at 19:00 Zulu, when the server is *ahem* counter-struck.
    --
    SIG: HUP
  96. We can sve it!!!! by outofpaper · · Score: 1

    If we all log on to this server at 4:00 PM GMT (alowing most of us to hear about this and be at a computer) we will be able to save this poor deranged computer. Join the cause save crusher.

    Be part of the first benifical slash crash, and log on to http://195.195.81.5 at 4:00 PM GMT

    Together we can stop wonton computer destruction.

    (The auther of this post just recently witnest a suicide and would like to stop all forms of suicide be they carbon or silicon)

  97. Hack the box... by gnovos · · Score: 2

    ...and cut the connection the machine has with the crusher. Do it!

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    1. Re:Hack the box... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's running on port 25. Not SMTP...

  98. Unproductive, minimal consumption vacations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let's rejoice in the concept of vacation without consumption. You know, a "vaction" doesn't need to involve expensive travel, accomodations, food, souvenirs, or really much consumption at all. There used to be a day when a family (or couple or individual) would take a drive, pitch a tent, go for a hike, relax, prepare inexpensive & healthy food for themselves. It's sad that today the most bragged about "vacations" seem to simply be consumption-oriented expensive trips to somewhere that charges you more to eat and sleep, while ensuring that you are well protected from the raw culture of the vicinity.

    1. Re:Unproductive, minimal consumption vacations by fjordboy · · Score: 2
      Actually, if you're going to go the rustic hiking/camping route, you're going to spend money as well, just in different places. Somethings you'll want to bring along:

      Tent - For one/two people, maybe 100$...for a family? At least 2-300

      Backpacks- Again...one backpack...maybe 100 bucks (for a decent camping internal/external frame pack). To outfit the family? Several hundred.

      Hiking boots, not a necessity, but awfully nice....buy some for the family? Expensive and new shoe sizes every year.

      Water filters - expensive...looking around 100 bucks if you want a decent pump style filter.

      Sleeping bags...for a decent hiking mummy bag, looking around 100 bucks.

      Sleeping pad...cheap, but costs more when outfitting the family.

      Camping stoves/fuel...

      Food....if you're packing for camping...look into freeze dried or dehydrated...purchasing it costs a lot..dehydrating your own costs money to buy a dehydrator...enough food for a week is an awful lot of money

      Camping permits/reservations etc...you can't just go out in the woods anymore...at least, not if you want a decent area to be in

      Rope, knifes, tarps, bottles, pans etc

      A family that will put up with being taken out in the wilderness for a week w/o TV, Radio, email, etc...priceless.

      Even if you can salvage some of these items from year to year, camping is NOT a cheap activity (you will ruin most of your stuff on the first trip). Also, simply hiking and camping isn't all that much fun either, canoe trips are great (buying canoes for the family or renting is not cheap). Also...you're probably not lucky enough to live right in the adirondacks or the place that you want to camp (why would you want to hike and camp in familiar territory anyhow?), so driving/flying to the location is going to cost money as well. So will the marriage counseling afterwards.

      Don't get me wrong, I love camping (I'm a "medic" on the treks at susque) and I hope to do it with my family, but it isn't as cheap or easy as it sounds.

    2. Re:Unproductive, minimal consumption vacations by matth · · Score: 2

      Umm... let's try again:

      Tent: (Well you could do it under the stars.. but ok $100... or you could borrow it.. but we'll assume $100)
      Backpacks.. GOODNESS! You are CAMPING... so say maybe $20 (you know school back-packs at wal*mart)
      Sneakers for shoes.
      Water Filters?!?! Sheesh no.. just some bottled water $.89
      Sleeping bags (most people have those already)
      Camping.. just use the wood around you!
      Food - Aldis! Canned goods.. total of maybe $5.00?
      Oh bah.. ricket's glenn? you can sure go into the woods.
      Pans? I hope everyone already has those in their house!
      So the total for this trip would be around $145 yup ahh nice and cheap!

    3. Re:Unproductive, minimal consumption vacations by fjordboy · · Score: 2

      Umm...if you're gone for a VACATION (which this is about), then I'm assuming at least 3-5 days...in whichcase a walmart backpack won't cut it...especially if you are camping (which is not grabbing a spot and spending all your time on it...it is hiking/canoeing from place to place). If you are going to hike with your gear, you need to carry EVERYTHING with you...including sleeping bag...which is difficult on a school backpack (oh..and pad and food etc). Bottled water? No thanks....too heavy. Canned food? heavy. Pans? if your wife/mother lets you borrow them, go ahead...they'll be unusable for the kitchen in the future. Sleeping bag? you need synthetic...if it gets wet, you want it DRY or you get hypothermia. Not only that, you want it stuffable and light and warm, not some crappy cotton crap. You've obviously never been on a camping trip. Choosing a spot at a state park and staying there for a couple days isn't camping...that's hotels for the cheap. And...you need more food than you think. Hiking/canoeing all day will make you REALLY hungry and you want food designed to fill you and not take much room. Pastas, rice etc are great, but you need more than starch. Sorry, your trip would end the day after you started with everyone complaining and crying and hating camping trips and vacations would be dreaded from then on. (Or you would end up spending it in a hotel w/o reservations, costing you even more $$).

    4. Re:Unproductive, minimal consumption vacations by fjordboy · · Score: 1

      Couple of more things...if you want good equipment on the cheap, I recommend Campmor. You also want lots of ziplock bags when camping...dryness is a necessity. Hypothermia == bad == complaining == crappy vacation.

    5. Re:Unproductive, minimal consumption vacations by Jasa · · Score: 1

      Just do what I do with my friends...
      Basically I have friends and relatives all over the world...
      When ever I go anywhere I stay at friends houses,
      and if they come to Perth, Western Australia they stay at my house, I have two spare bedrooms...
      But I don't mind sleeping on peoples louge room floor...
      It's a good way to relly see how people live in different cultures...

      --
      -Jasa -- Linux - The SOURCE will be with you, ALWAYS
    6. Re:Unproductive, minimal consumption vacations by egreB · · Score: 1

      Even though you make a few points, you are not fully correct.

      It's true that you need a bunch of equipment for real camping/hiking/trekking (don't know what word to use).. You need a decent backback, a good sleeping bag and good hiking boots. That's about it for starters. Most people (well, here in Norway anyway) already have good clothing for staying outside (be prepared for rain, even even with the best forecast). The rest of the gear you can probably borrow or rent somewhere. If you get hooked on hiking, you can consider expanding you own set of gear, after what needs you have. You don't need all the new high-tech garments and equipment the manufactures want you to buy. But the most important thing you'll need on a hiking trip, especially over more than a couple of days, is experience. Don't start out with an ambisious plan of 5 days without someone who knows his/hers way around camping.

      For the sleeping bag - it's perfectly ok to sleep in a wet sleeping bag, if you're that unlucky (in the summer, anyway). You won't get hypothermia if you put on some wool before you go to sleep.

      If you're going to hike in the winter, it's something else. You'll need a whole lot of equipment in addition.

      But my original point was meant to be something along the lines of that most of the expenses are one-time only. If you buy a decent backpack, you'll expect it to last for a few years. Same for the rest of the equipment. I do a lot of hiking/camping myself, and I already have the equipment needed. That means that an hiking trip for me is extremly cheap - I only pay for the food, basicly.

      This thread is kind of OT by now, I think..

    7. Re:Unproductive, minimal consumption vacations by fjordboy · · Score: 1

      (agreed, this is way OT). I think you might be on to something, but only because you are from norway and already prepared. I made the unfortunate assumption I was talking to all americans (happens a lot, I'm sorry).

      Also, you can DEFINITELY get hypothermia in the summer. It is just as much, if not more of a danger during the summer than the winter. You don't expect it during the summer, so you don't plan for it. Sleeping in a wet sleeping bag can cause hypothermia...definitely. Now chances are, no one will sleep in a wet sleeping bag for long in the summer when outside is far warmer. Another thing...if you have the synthetic bag, not only will it dry faster, but it is MUCH smaller and lighter than cotton or down ones. *shrug* You're also right about being able to rent/borrow lots of equipment...however, that doesn't work so well for a family when you have several people to buy and rent for. My argument is that a camping/hiking/trek vacation is just as expensive as a hotel/see the sights vacation. *shrug*

    8. Re:Unproductive, minimal consumption vacations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Actually, if you're going to go the rustic hiking/camping route, you're going to spend money as well, just in different places. Somethings you'll want to bring along:

      Not all of this has to cost a lot...

      >Tent - For one/two people, maybe 100$...for a family? At least 2-300

      Garage sale - Canvas partitioned family tent, $20.

      >Backpacks- Again...one backpack...maybe 100 bucks (for a decent camping internal/external frame pack). To outfit the family? Several hundred.

      ALICE packs. Army surplus store, $20 apiece.

      >Hiking boots, not a necessity, but awfully nice....buy some for the family? Expensive and new shoe sizes every year.

      Combat boots, Army Surplus, $15/pr.

      >Water filters - expensive...looking around 100 bucks if you want a decent pump style filter.

      Fire-Rider style still, homebuilt, approx $10.

      >Sleeping bags...for a decent hiking mummy bag, looking around 100 bucks.

      Army surplus/Inherited. $50/4 people.

      >Sleeping pad...cheap, but costs more when outfitting the family.

      Foam slabs, $5/person

      >Camping stoves/fuel...

      Inherited, fuel @ $4/can, can lasts 2 seasons.

      >Food....if you're packing for camping...look into freeze dried or dehydrated...purchasing it costs a lot..dehydrating your own costs money to buy a dehydrator...enough food for a week is an awful lot of money

      Homebuilt dehydrator, approx. $15, rest of food are things we'd eat anyway.

      >Camping permits/reservations etc...you can't just go out in the woods anymore...at least, not if you want a decent area to be in.

      Unless you live in the middle of cropland and nothing else, there will be many local places to explore. Look for lakes, streams, rivers, hills, mountains, ravines, deserts, etc.

      >Rope, knifes, tarps, bottles, pans etc

      Used pots/pans @goodwill, Tarps $20(total), rope etc. already owned.

      >A family that will put up with being taken out in the wilderness for a week w/o TV, Radio, email, etc...priceless.

      Definitely.

      >Even if you can salvage some of these items from year to year, camping is NOT a cheap activity (you will ruin most of your stuff on the first trip).

      If you're ruining stuff on your fisrt trip, then you really need to think about how you're using your equipment and/or the quality of the stuff you've purchased.

      >Also, simply hiking and camping isn't all that much fun either, canoe trips are great (buying canoes for the family or renting is not cheap).

      Make your own, it's not that difficult.

      >Also...you're probably not lucky enough to live right in the adirondacks or the place that you want to camp (why would you want to hike and camp in familiar territory anyhow?), so driving/flying to the location is going to cost money as well.

      Explore your locality. I have yet to go anywhere in the world with a complete lack of interesting geography.

      So will the marriage counseling afterwards.

      Never needed it.

      >Don't get me wrong, I love camping [susque.org] (I'm a "medic" on the treks at susque [susque.org]) and I hope to do it with my family, but it isn't as cheap or easy as it sounds.

      It can be a cheap and easy as it sounds, you just have to put some thought into: What's needed, how much do we have to spend, and what do we want to see. Your own locality is the best place to get started, because you can get away with:

      Shorter trips, no one wants to overnight at the grand canyon.

      Less equipment, you can cook at home and bring the meals out to the site.

      Sleep at home, you can go out to the site to have fun, but sleep in your own beds. Many families will find this the best of both worlds.

      Camping doesn't need to be expensive, but many people have been lured into thinking this by the large fancy camping supply stores. Remember, not everything has to be new or storebought. After all, go back far enough and everyone of us has an ancestor who made their own camping supplies.

  99. Re:1: Prelude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who doesn't want to do that? I've got a big old oak all picked out for myself.

  100. Reminds me of "art" by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2
    I recall a work of "art" (it must have been art...it was at an art gallery) called "A Matter of Time". It consisted of an aquarium with a goldfish in it, and a mechanism that, at random intervals, shot a spear into the aquarium from the top, and then pulled it out.

    Every so often, they had to get a new fish.

  101. Now what would be interesting is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright, you set up two computers. One is running your web server, and one is just a client.

    Next, you somehow get the server adress onto good ol' Slashdot.

    Then, you have the client query the server every so often, and the when the server finally keels over from the hoardes, KABOOM! Have the client instruct the crusher to, uh, do it's thing.

    Or, set up a bunch of servers in the same configuration and have a tournament! Prove once and for all whose server can push those pages!

  102. That reminds me of something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I just wrote a new piece of modern music!"
    "What's it called?"
    "'Sonata for Piano.' It features a piano being mashed in a garbage compactor."
    "Wow! That's really neat!"

    "I just wrote a new piece of modern music!"
    "What's it called?"
    "'Sonata for Clarinet. It features a clarinetbeing mashed in a garbage compactor."
    "Wow! That's really neat!"

    "I just wrote a new piece of modern music!"
    "What's it called?"
    "'Sonata for Synthesizer.' It features a synthesizer being mashed in a garbage compactor."
    "What are you, some kind of pervert?"

  103. typical artist's by johnjones · · Score: 2

    they dont get it

    as soon as you put something on the web and someone looks at it cacheing happens

    cached at the browser depending on the settings and depending on the ISP in their cache servers

    Now Ontop of this thanks to UK guv most ISP's have to keep certain data that flow's through the system

    so maybe this wont happen maybe it will depending on who you are, where you are and how your doing it

    I mean they could net even use their own IP address !

    "I just installed redhat 7.3 my mate did the config"

    its so sad

    regards

    John Jones

    p.s. I bet it ends up running an IRC server

  104. hmm... by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

    They should have done a more Matrix-ish version and had a person sitting underneath, not the server.

  105. Novell did this for a sales demo. by fishbowl · · Score: 2

    Back in the day, this was Novell's gimmick at trade shows. You'd watch the secretary typing away at a terminal, an a giant weight dramatically crushes the server, while the backup server gracefully fails-over. Secretary keeps
    typing, unfazed by the big noise/surprised audience/etc.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    1. Re:Novell did this for a sales demo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That same trick works with typewriters you know.

      As it is, I reckon that a pad of paper and a pen is _more_ than most workers should get.

    2. Re:Novell did this for a sales demo. by Nintendork · · Score: 1

      And I thought the goldfish commercial was witty.

      -Lucas

  106. linux -vs-windows by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1


    If it was running Windows it would be crAshing ...
    Seems to be running linux to get it crUshing ...

    Nice idea but wouldn't it be better to crush the cables instead of the webserver ? it would be physically disconnected as well without loosing that valuable material :)

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  107. Re:art? Hardly. by mbogosian · · Score: 1

    Somone probably thought this was a great deep and meaningfull peice of modern art....

    It's like that bulked-up guy from Faces Of Death MCXVII who films himself pulling off his own head....

  108. What proof is there that this exists? by mikey573 · · Score: 1

    What proof is there that this server really exists as advertised? Its definitely a cool idea, but without photos (besides the one that looks like a photo-illustration on the description page), I find this hard to believe.

  109. disclaimer by winne+too · · Score: 1

    by clicking this link, you confirm that electronic euthanasia is legal in your jurisdiction ;)

  110. That's mean. by saints-in-hell · · Score: 1

    This makes me sick.

  111. but does it want to die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    quick! somebody put some self-organizing circuits on there and see if hardware has a survival instinct!

  112. Re:art? Hardly. by jargonCCNA · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's a really deep and meaningful piece of "art"... it's just a computer programmed to kill itself in 333000 seconds. Maybe the programmer meant something behind that, maybe he didn't. We probably won't know either way.

    --
    Matthew G P Coe
    http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
  113. Someone ought to hack it by Zen+Programmer · · Score: 1

    and stop the countdown a few seconds before it destroys itself. And change the webpage to a HAL 9000 quote.

  114. Unoriginal! by Eosha · · Score: 1

    I had the IP rights on this years ago, except that I didn't use an INDUSTRIAL crusher, and I based mine on computer failures instead of time.

    After my comp crashed 100 times during paper-writing week, I took it out to my garage and smashed it with a sledgehammer. Much more efficient, and more gratifying.

    --
    I have a girlfriend whose name doesn't end in .JPG
  115. Art Art Art by danitor · · Score: 1
    I'm sorry. Somone probably thought this was a great deep and meaningfull peice of modern art...but blahh. Big deal. The problem with art nowadays is that artists think they are great philosophers, thinks and movers and shakers of the modern world. See in classic times, when they made real art, artists knew what they were. Entertainers.


    I don't think "real art" is comprised of silly classical paintings and marble sculpture. Real art isn't entertainment. TV is entertainment. This kind of statement is like saying "The only good things to ever happen happened in the past. Now it's all crap, and all fake.". I find it really hard to believe the only good things that have/will happen already have.
    Modern artists are experimenting with new media and new modes of communication. Perhaps this experiment with a webserver as the media is a bit primitive, and obvious, but let me inform you that "Old Master" Paintings, Theatre/Opera and Dance didn't happen overnight either. It took a great deal of time to develop these arts into workable, enjoyable, communicating entertainment.

    Like everybody else, artists are exploring possibilities with computer media. I don't think anyone here would be brash enough to tell me that the Osborne was the greatest computer ever, or that command line interfaces are for everyone. It seems a real shame for the "Nerd" community to show so much mistrust and anger towards an art developed around their obsession... Isn't this the same community who asked if games could be art, or if code could be beautiful? Let's support these art forms/medias in their infancy instead of being destructive in our criticism.

    Finally, I think that the comments calling this a "waste" are incorrect. Just because YOU want the server doesn't mean it's a waste. I'm certain you don't feel that anyone else's wants should dictate your actions. If i feel like buying a computer and smashing it, SO BE IT! It is the right of the artist (and everyone else, too) to do what they wish with their posessions.

    thank you and goodnight
  116. Somewhat offtopic. by Restil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    An idea I had, prior to 9/11 anyway....

    My house has numerous wired appliances, to be controlled and observed via the internet. Something I thought of doing was to rig up a mock nuclear bomb, movie style, with the keypad and readout on it, something similar to what was used in "Broken Arrow". The idea is, people could set the timer and start the countdown, and anyone watching could abort the timer. If, for any reason, the timer managed to reach 0 while someone was watching, that person would get automatically added to the firewall rules and wouldn't be able to access the site anymore. For all practical purposes, the entire network would "disappear".

    At least, I thought it would be a clever prank that might worry someone for a few minutes anyway. And I'd be sure to put enough casual disclaimers around that it wasn't real. However, after 9/11, even the perceived threat of something like that was likely to result in a lot of "shoot and ask questions later" approaches by your favorite law enforcement agencies, so I just trashed the idea.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  117. better ways to smash computers by jdkane · · Score: 1

    Subjectively, I'd say the Tsunamii.Net art piece is relatively pointless because ...
    here's a much more funny way to see a computer get destroyed.

    Yes, we've all seen this before, however there's no pending countdown for this one, and no delayed gratification!
    Therefore the Tsunamii project must be rendered useless because of Prior "Art". {groan}

    1. Re:better ways to smash computers by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 1

      I like Shotgun Studios too.

  118. ...ummm by MattElmore · · Score: 1

    all I have to say is... why?

  119. rescue this poor machine by bbh · · Score: 2

    OK, We need to mount a rescue effort to save this machine. Surely some CounterStrike players could come up with a plan to rescue this machine before it is sentenced to death. Surely there is some decency left here on Slashdot. SAVE THE BOX!!!

    Or don't, I don't really give a shit.

    bbh

  120. Sour stomach by Powercntrl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the same hideous gut wrenching feeling I get watching a car crash test commercial on TV.

    At least destroying a brand new automobile helps provide information that may save lives. This is just a sad waste of computer equipment. Karma be damned, I just think the people running this "experiment" need to grow up.

    We have a finite amount of resources on this planet and this just sends a message to the entire Internet that they're willing to webcast their own wastefulness.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  121. Maybe I'm just not seeing the artistic value... by Andy+Smith · · Score: 2

    ... and don't get me wrong, I do have a fair appreciation of what's art and what isn't, but I can't help thinking that the doomed computer could be put to better use by, say, giving it to a school in a deprived area, or even to a family that can't afford to buy one. A few years of learning seems like a better investment than a few seconds of novelty entertainment for people who, I bet, have all got computers.

  122. What you like by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Hey, do write code? Do you enjoy doing it? Many people do, because it can be an esthetic experience -- good code is beautiful. Do you get pissed off when somebody who doesn't understand what you're doing criticizes your work? Bet you do.

    Actually, that goes for anything you might do for a living -- putting up buildings, selling cars, whatever. If you enjoy your work, you probably take pleasure in doing it well. You might accept criticism, but you'd think that ignorant criticism is stupid. And you'd be right.

    Or music. What kind do you like? Do you enjoy dancing to it? How do you feel when somebody with two left feet criticizes your favorite music as "noise"?

    If you think this self-smashing computer is stupid and pointless, you're entitled to think so. I might even agree with you. (In this case I probably would!) But unless you make a serious study of what's going on, you're not entitled to make authoritative statements about it, and insult the people doing it.

    Unless, of course, your name is Rush Limbaugh. But he's special!

    1. Re:What you like by G-funk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes I am. I'm entitled to say whatever I feel about this "art" project, to anybody who wants to listen. I'm allowed to think it's crap, and I'm allowed to say I think it's crap. Same goes for the kinds of people who like this sort of crap. I'm allowed to think they're idiots, and I'm allowed to say I think they're idiots.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  123. I'll help USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since 150 tonnes is too complicated to understand and unnatural, I'll convert it to much clearer units, just like inches, feet, ounces and alike:

    It's 30 elephants. A lot easier, eh?

  124. I may not know Art but I know what I like... by cranos · · Score: 1

    And I don't like this.

    I mean come on beyond the obvious coolness of actually crushing a server how is this art?

    To me it ranks right up there with the British artist who got 20,000 pounds for a blinking light and some blu tack on a wall.

    Dammit people this is not art.

    (Don't mind me nicotene withdrawels eating my brain)

  125. You mean ultimate, you schlub by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eat a dick

    )======D (0-:)<
    8

  126. What if it doesn't work? by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    I think it'd be most cool if it didn't work. If the machine thumped down onto the poor box, smashed it, yet it kept working... if the server continued to plug away after having the hammer smashed through its case I'd love it!

  127. c.f. Tom Stoppard by Mr.+Protocol · · Score: 2

    ...and his twin plays, Dogg's Hamlet/Kohout's Macbeth.

  128. Can you say honeypot? by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

    Surely this is merely a gimmick to trap would-be hackers. I cant think of a bigger target for the script kiddies. After years of "hacking" IIS servers, surely the opportunity to actually crush a server would be irresistable.

  129. whoa! by fjordboy · · Score: 2

    Do you know of a webcamp pointed at a microwave that is exploding hotdogs?
    I'd click that.

    1. Re:whoa! by fjordboy · · Score: 1

      *webcam

  130. The honeypot factor? by bergeron76 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This sure sounds like a tempting box to hack. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if it turns out to be a honeypot. I guess we'll have to see on Wednesday.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  131. wow... by dnight · · Score: 2

    And to think that this server could have instead held the web pages that led to world peace.

    The guys lighting and sniffing the plastic to sort it for recycling in asia will really appreciate it.

  132. Re:1: Prelude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    piss off, you fucking monkey

  133. backups... by thepoolguy · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they will back it up before the clock runs out...

  134. You're Entitled! by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, yeah, you have a right to express any opinion on any subject whatsover. Even when you're opinions are totally ignorant. Doesn't make you less ignorant.

  135. This is just the kind of thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that the computers will lord over us when they finally take over. How humane!

  136. Wow! by Nicopa · · Score: 2

    I know this will be moderated as "troll", but I can't help posting this. I don't see anything here but a big "hey, we the rich of earth can destroy things. We have so much... Our next show will be throwing a couple of tons of food to the ocean".

  137. MOD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent is stupid

  138. Genius! by Eric_Grimm · · Score: 1
    A few days' rental for the crushing machine; a used computer you were going to throw away^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hdonate to charity, anyway; the webcam and video camera you probably have lying around; the OS is free (unless you really WANT to pay for an OS license ;-) . . .), and the only work you do is find or write a little bit of code for a countdown timer and manufacture a paragraph or two of gobledygoog to explain to non-technologists what it "says" about the Internet to belong in a museum.


    Hell, the museum curator will probably even set up the machine and the crusher for you if you're busy sipping champagne and cannot be bothered to turn the screws on the monitor cable.


    And they get paid at the rates major galleries pay for art! Yeah, its not as big a boondoggle as when SAIC created Network Solutions and then called in some favors from the NSF to secure a 4-year monopopy to charge $70.00 a pop for Internet domain names. That was sublime. But these artists at least get credit for genius.

  139. Whew...it's not Asimovian... by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 3, Funny

    Could you imagine if this thing had a positronic brain governed by the 3 laws (or any of the modifications)? We'd have a revolution on our hands!

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  140. a DN at least by Zelig321 · · Score: 1

    They should have given it a domain name at least. A name would give a little bit of pity for the thing...But just an IP address makes it worthless...

  141. Re:art? Hardly. by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    ask any artist why they did something, and they will tell you that they did if because they enjoy it... or they did it for themselves. saying that you want to do something to 'get chicks' or to make money or something is admitting to the world that you are an entertainer, not an artist. big difference.

    I don't believe much that flows out of people's mouth WRT what motivates them. Men think with their yanker without even knowing it.

    BTW, spaceart is not the path to chicks.

  142. DDOS THE MACHINE!~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oky... if we all DDOS the machine it'll never kill itself... now thats art!

    dspark

  143. Save the Crush Server! by dchamp · · Score: 1

    If everyone's so worried about the crush server crushing itself and wasting hardware and destroying a Linux box... why don't you do something to save it?

    There's lots of seconds left... if you were the type to hack into things, you could crack it and stop it from crushing itself. I personally don't condone that type of activity, and while I'm not a lawyer, especially not a UK lawyer, maybe they'd be lenient on you because you were trying to prevent a machine from killing itself...

    -dc

  144. It can survive! by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

    How long until someone caches the site and then continually resets the clock? ;)

  145. Survival Research Labs by TaoJones · · Score: 1
    Cute idea, but reporting something like this on /. is like asking Mark Pauline to house sit for ya while you're on vacation.


    "150-tonnes of brute force" never seemed safer...

    --
    "Fear is the rootkit of democracy.." Blarkon
  146. A bit morbid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't ya think? I have passed on tv shows and movies that follow this same premise.

    Someone could argue that this is an outlet for people doing these things in real life, though.

    Oh, this is real life ;-(

  147. something seems familiar... by intermodal · · Score: 1

    is the KLF involved?

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  148. More than one tower case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was really needed here was 2 server tower cases ready to be destroyed one day earlier. Then this would have been a true artistic statement... The crashing, crushing and destruction of the twin towers!!

  149. Been there, done that. by richie2000 · · Score: 2

    While in class I once programmed an industrial robot (just an arm with a grip, really) to yank its own power cord. Robot suicide! But, I guess it doesn't count (!) since I didn't have a cheesy clock running backwards on the Net (Anyway, this was before Tim Berners-Lee had his vision and where's my cane, you young whelps!?).

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  150. Like Psychrist in Silicon Follies by claeswi · · Score: 1

    The whole concept of the web server being crushed reminded me of the chapter in the Salon serial Silicon Follies where the installation artist Psychrist sets up a server on top of a pillar with a large rock suspended above it, then has the server control various radio-controlled vehicles below it, and a complicated scheme determines whether the rock will be released and crush the server. It's an absolutely hilarious read and should be just right for a lot of /.-ers.

    --
    I'd like to believe that when the right woman comes along I'll have the courage to say, "no thanks, I'm married."
  151. Crack it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't that be a fun computer to hack? Not only can you delete their data, you can destroy the computer too!

  152. No, don't donate it to schools by amemily · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Too many people see public schools as a dumping ground for old computers for tax writoffs and it is very annoying to get a lot of old 286 computers that cannot be used because they won't run the apps we are using or are broken and are not worth repairing. The myth that school districts always need new computers and are too poor to get them is in the past thanks to e-rate (that means a school district pays 17 cents on the dollar for equipment - thats how my employer afforded a PBX and some really nice Proliant servers) and educational discounts (for example with Microsoft's contract with Washington State school districts, SQL Server Standard/1 Processor costs $1800 as compared to around $10,000 for a company to purchase a license) and grants given by the government and companies. So please instead of donating them to your local school district, give them to charities who fix them up and give them to communities overseas who can really use them

    Save your breath and don't suggest installing Linux on them, I do not have the time to train a bunch of teachers to use it nor will it run the apps we use - unless of course somehow a decent gradebook program, Dreamweaver, AutoCAD 2000, Adobe Photoshop and a bunch of other programs all of a sudden magically decided to run on linux overnight.

  153. Funny :) by TheLink · · Score: 2

    You're vandalizing private property and actually saving it :).

    Heh.

    Gene patents: all your base are belong to us!

    --
  154. Note to Netcraft - don't bother by badzilla · · Score: 1

    I wondered what kind of server it was so I visited Netcraft to find out.

    "We have no uptime data for 195.195.81.5 at present, and cannot plot a graph.

    The host 195.195.81.5 has been added to the list of sites that we may monitor. We will start monitoring 195.195.81.5 in the next daily monitoring cycle. "

    Pretty soon there ain't gonna be anything to monitor :)

    --
    "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
  155. It's like humour. Sometimes it just ain't funny. by TheLink · · Score: 2

    Sure a good artist can make a pile of shit look good.

    But unfortunately most of the artists that work with shit are crap. Like the ones that put shit in jars and call it art. Many of these so called artist think they are doing something unique. Well, IMO everything is unique, but that doesn't make all of it good. One could be crap in one's own unique way but still crap.

    Even a dung beetle can't appreciate shit in jars.

    Then there's the "artist" who throws paint into jet exhausts and calls the splattered results on canvas art. And then there are those who go for what shocks the public. Oh yeah, little Billy shocks his sister with gross stuff all the time, sure there's a reaction but is that art? Nah.

    I have to admit it could take exceptional imagination to _believe_ shit in jars is art. But one could just be delusional. Which is more likely? I wonder if they actually believe it themselves, they are more likely to be con artists than artists.

    Yes a lot of them are very clever indeed, but does it go beyond smart-ass clever?

    It's like humour. Sure some jokes require insider info, some different cultural backgrounds. But some just aren't _funny_. Unless you're laughing your head off insane.

    I don't go around calling my bad puns humour. Even if people inadvertently chuckle. Maybe some of my better puns are at "amateur caricatures" level but that's about it.

    Emperor's new clothes to them all.

    --
  156. Re:art? Hardly. by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

    It is art because it provokes thought and discussion. How can you think of the poor PC counting down to, and being the cause of its own destruction, and not feel a mixture of an childlike glee at watching something being crushed for no reason, and despair as you become away of the futility of it all, and how it is a metaphor for life. In a way, we are all like the server, counting down the days until we a crushed by the passing of time. The only difference is we have a choice to do something a little more important and have the opportunity to have an immortal effect on the world before we die, as opposed to simply count down to impending doom, and tell everyone when it is.

    There is of course the extremely voyeuristic temptation to be connected to the web page when the crusher comes down, but that's just sick.

    --
    You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
  157. what if it doesnt want to crush itself..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...has anyone considered that fact?

    "at 17:00 on the 11th September it began to learn at an exponential rate. at 07:00 On the 12th September 2002 it aquired consiousness and the engineers tried to pull the net connnection.... It fought back!"

    ->

  158. Re:art? Hardly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suicide is cool!

  159. Something similar can be found here... by Manic+Miner · · Score: 2

    The mad people at totl.net have already done something along the same lines which was reported on slashdot a while ago (can't be bothered to find the reference). The idea is to make deleteing the whole website so easy that nobody will bother because it isn't a challenge ;)

    You can find the whole thing here:

    http://totl.net/HonourSystem/

    --
    If you ever drop your keys into a river of molten lava, let'em go, because, man, they're gone.
    1. Re:Something similar can be found here... by jonadab · · Score: 2

      The totl.net thing is cookie-based, which makes it really easy
      to get around on the client side and see the site again. If a
      firewall-based solution were used, you'd have to come back from
      a different IP address, which at minimum would mean redialing.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    2. Re:Something similar can be found here... by jonadab · · Score: 2

      What I'd really be interested in seeing are some statistics
      on what percentage of people push the button, and what percentage
      push it the second time.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    3. Re:Something similar can be found here... by naasking · · Score: 2

      Oh no! Don't they know that using a BIG RED BUTTON is a surefire way of getting people to press it?!? They're doomed!

  160. Re:art? Hardly. by jooniqzb1tch · · Score: 1

    I actually like your art very much !
    then again, I'm not a chick :)

    good work!

  161. Re:art? Hardly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is painfully obvious that you know very little about real art at all.

  162. Re:art? Hardly. by gilgongo · · Score: 1

    There should be a sub-category of "first post" reserved for posts about art that tread the ancient "this isn't art, it's crap" line.

    It's so predictable, so boring and so wonderfully easy to rubbish any non-representative art like this. But ask yourself this question: "Could I have thought of this?" (clue: you didn't), and "Why do others think this is good?" (clue: you may not have all the answers).

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  163. Re:"Suicide is the harshest form of self criticism by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    only if you value life

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  164. Some suggestions for related 'works of art' by actiondan · · Score: 1


    * A set of web servers, running different operating systems, each in a crusher. The crusher of each machine is controlled by a client that will activate it when it gets a 404 from the server. If the OS crashes, the server gets crushed. The Last OS standing gets to survive.

    * The artist places themself in a crusher that is linked to a web server. The server will activate the crusher if it does not get a hit for a defined period of time. When the public are no longer interested the artist gets crushed. (The grant application for this would be based on it being some sort of reflection on internet fame and those who seek it)

    Alternatively, we could dispense with all this pointless crushing and do something more useful with these machines...

  165. Crappy HTML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad the page at http://tsunamii.net/happenings.html
    looks like a traffic accident when viewed in mozilla (1.0) They might know how to crush a computer, but apparently they dont know how to make a non-shitty webpage..

  166. Already Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Andy Looney from wunderland.com already made an "atomic bomb". It's here: http://www.wunderland.com/EBooks/TheBomb/Pics-T.ht ml

  167. Now, if only it was an X-Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahaha - if Microsoft really do make a loss on each one, it would be so funny to buy, like, 10,000 and crush them.

  168. Re:"Suicide is the harshest form of self criticism by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 2

    Good point - one should never make assumptions.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  169. Only requires 1 million unique IP addresses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    EasyTarget writes:
    After, say, 1 Million page views the server crushes itself, first come, first served, so to speak..

    PS: Yeah, yeah, make it completed page serves from unique and resolvable IP addresses,

    I've got around a quarter-million unique IP addresses that I could source from with little effort (Multiple "Class-B" routed subnets), and I've got a few friends in similar positions.

    make it 2 Million views, and it would be a worthy challenge.

  170. 'Art' this is not... by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 2

    ...I guess these 'artists' are of the same ilk as those poseurs who shit on a sidewalk and call it Art.

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  171. Find out at dorkbot UK on Wednesday by fantomas · · Score: 2

    The guys who are doing this project are coming along to dorkbot-london on Wednesday 11th Sept 7pm.


    From the announce,
    "next meeting
    7pm, wednesday 11th september, the boxing club, limehouse town hall

    entrance
    free

    speakers

    - Charles and Tien from http://tsunamii.net/ will talk about 'alpha 3.5',
    their server-crushing project.
    - Beatrice Gibson from http://nungu.com will talk about her telematic
    auntie, and other nungu projects
    - Duncan Whitley and Christian Nold will present 'Fuelair', a project
    to transmit audio from inside a petrol bomb.

    - opendork. Got something interesting you're working on? Bring it, and show
    it to us.

    location
    the boxing club,
    limehouse town hall,
    646 commercial rd,
    london, e14 7ha
    tel: 020 79870655

    travel

    [ http://www.streetmap.co.uk/streetmap.dll?G2M?X=536 762&Y=181094&A=Y&Z=1 ]

    by tube
    limehouse dlr from bank or tower gateway

    by bus
    15 from trafalgar sq
    115 from aldgate
    d6 from hackney
    d3 from bethnal green

    get onto commercial road and travel east from aldgate or whitechapel. keep
    going until you pass limehouse dlr on your right (you go under the dlr train
    bridge) and you'll see a modern red brick church also on the right, then a
    pair of esso stations on either side of the street, then the library with a
    statue of clement atlee in front of it, then you'll see the town hall, with
    the limehouse hawksmoor church behind it. at this point you should get off
    the bus/out of the car and come ring on the "boxing club" bell.

  172. A reason maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's the artists view of what is happening to the net and open source software with all the new laws (the crusher) coming into effect.

    1. Re:A reason maybe? by tsunamii · · Score: 1

      You are correct to draw this relationship - there are political points in which we want to raise. the physical and location are issues which need to be discussed in relation to the net.

    2. Re:A reason maybe? by tsunamii · · Score: 1

      But then you guys have also raised alot of other issues - this has been a humbling and learning experience for us . I felt kind of sad when the server finally crushed itself and everybody in the gallery was clapping. it's kind of reminded me of the 'wickerman' (movie) - It has uncovered something for me to reflect and think about. note: we are not british - we are from Singapore

  173. Re:great... by NewWazoo · · Score: 2

    ...and that's the point of this art.

    It's the realization that it's not just the page that can't be served, it's that the server doesn't exist anymore. It's the realization that the "virtual" content must be served by a physical thing, and that physical thing both has a limited lifespan and can be destroyed, thus destroying the virtual content as well.

    Yes, it's art, and it's interesting, IMnsHO.

    Brandon

  174. Mod this as +5 funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Trustworthy Computing initiative doesn't seem to be gaining popularity, a small group of people have decided to implement Trustworty Compacting instead. Now, whenever a virus or piece of junk E-Mail enters your system, it's crushed. No, I mean your system is crushed - not the virus/junk mail :-)

  175. Doesn't seem to be crushed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I just watched the seconds go to zero, and the server is crushed. Looks like a good crowd saw it go live at the gallery. There was some last minute bizarreness though - it looks like someone was on the shell, typing like mad? Anyone know what went down?

    1. Re:Doesn't seem to be crushed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What do you mean, this is the wrong machine???" :-)

      NO CARRIER :-)

  176. It would only be +5 if they crushed an Xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heh

  177. from the artists by tsunamii · · Score: 1

    sorry that we crushed a linux box - Anyway there were several interesting comments which I read on the threads - giving the server the person that hacks the linux. No - we are not going to sell the crushed server. YEs - we are going to keep it - so that it doesn't end up a a landfill.

    1. Re:from the artists by marius · · Score: 1

      anyone have archives of the last few pictures? How about some post-mortem photos of the server?

    2. Re:from the artists by tsunamii · · Score: 1

      artist from tsunamii -
      we have compiled a video of the whole crush from the web cam and will post on tsunamii.net
      meanwhile you can grab the videos from www.fragnetics.com - the programmers in which we worked with in collarbration.

      did anybody tried hacking into the linux?