Huuu, "we" is you and I. I assume that MichaelKristopeit### (where ### is a number) is all the same user. Given the consistency your responses so far, I think it is a safe bet.
A few questions now: 1. I claimed to be nothing? Care to point out which post of mine said that? 2. Are the two last sentences supposed to be some kind of sig? 3. Funny as you didn't mention my mum's face this time. Getting tired already? Come on, we're just getting started. Don't let me down so soon.
Hmmm, I really wonder though. The sun is rarely up in the sky at these latitudes, so it is very highly unlikely that the sun's rays will go through the ozone hole and hit you. The rays that hit you go through the atmosphere much lower than the hole, so there should be no (or little) danger - at least, related to the ozone hole mentioned.
That, and the fact that the lower the sun is in the sky, the less UV you get since it goes through the atmosphere at a steep angle traversing the ozone layer on a diagonal which is much longer than the thickness of the layer itself. So all in all, I don't foresee big UV problems for Russia, Greenland and Norway.
I'm not a scientist though, so don't blame me if you get a sunburn.
So, you have 500 accounts on slashdot and cannot get out of your time loop. I'll say you are a robot. You're definitely not smart enough to be a human.
I somehow doubt that my mom's face has (or has had) any goal. And no, she doesn't look very pleased when I'm angry, so I'd say your first sentence is wrong for the most part.
I noticed that it's the second time you mention my pseudo. Do you have a personal grudge against x and y?
And since I must get at your level in order for you to understand at least a word from my post, I'll say something about your last sentence: Ditto.
They are most certainly not selling the fire at a loss. Archos have sold such tablets for years at around the same pricepoint, and believe me, they're making money out of them.
cnet might disagree with all their theoretical computations of course. But who cares?
I think your goal is to make me angry, but alas, I am in a good mood today. I even feel like feeding a good hairy mountain troll. These things can be funny at times.
In my original post, I said "Stop digging". I can only reassert this advice which, even though you've dug yourself a whole lot deeper now, is still the best thing I think you should do.
The first was the Witkar in Amsterdam more than 35 years ago.
Didn't you read TFS? It said "world's first electric car share program" !!! It also says the "largest", but since it's the first, I think it's a given.
So stop spreading FUD and surrender to your great robotic slashdot overlord.
Same here. I have two 45U bays in my garage. a few servers in those bays. A Linux desktop. HDHomerun in the attic. Media centers all across the house. And I bought my wife an iPad.
Well, see right there I know you're making this up, because no one with 90U in their garage and a linux desktop has ever kissed a girl, much less married one.
Same here. I have two 45U bays in my garage. a few servers in those bays. A Linux desktop. HDHomerun in the attic. Media centers all across the house. And I bought my wife an iPad. Everyone's happy, except those people that think that owning an iPad makes you a stupid moronic cretin. But I don't give a rat's ass about them, so all is well in the end.
In 2010, the airport handled 46,514,154 passengers
2% of that is almost a million people. Every year. Now, let's assume handling each these false positives is the work of an hour on average. That's about a million hours spent.
Let's assume a workday of 8 hours, and 250 workdays a year. That's about 2000 hours a year for an average worker. So it'll take 500 people to track these false positives at JFK.
I think it's a little unacceptable, but YMMV of course.
Why?
Huuu, "we" is you and I. I assume that MichaelKristopeit### (where ### is a number) is all the same user. Given the consistency your responses so far, I think it is a safe bet.
A few questions now:
1. I claimed to be nothing? Care to point out which post of mine said that?
2. Are the two last sentences supposed to be some kind of sig?
3. Funny as you didn't mention my mum's face this time. Getting tired already? Come on, we're just getting started. Don't let me down so soon.
True. But my point is that the ozone hole shouldn't make matters worse.
Hmmm. It doesn't look like we're going anywhere.
You're sweet.
This is all well and good, but is this climate a recent turn of events or is it like that since as long as you can remember?
Hmmm, I really wonder though. The sun is rarely up in the sky at these latitudes, so it is very highly unlikely that the sun's rays will go through the ozone hole and hit you. The rays that hit you go through the atmosphere much lower than the hole, so there should be no (or little) danger - at least, related to the ozone hole mentioned.
That, and the fact that the lower the sun is in the sky, the less UV you get since it goes through the atmosphere at a steep angle traversing the ozone layer on a diagonal which is much longer than the thickness of the layer itself. So all in all, I don't foresee big UV problems for Russia, Greenland and Norway.
I'm not a scientist though, so don't blame me if you get a sunburn.
Hmmm. Let's see. Boooo !!!!
Scared?
So, you have 500 accounts on slashdot and cannot get out of your time loop. I'll say you are a robot. You're definitely not smart enough to be a human.
Hmmm. This is interesting. Is your sole purpose to waste my time? I'm genuinely wondering.
You're beginning to sound like a broken record my friend. Do you have anything else to say (save the things you've already said)?
I somehow doubt that my mom's face has (or has had) any goal. And no, she doesn't look very pleased when I'm angry, so I'd say your first sentence is wrong for the most part.
I noticed that it's the second time you mention my pseudo. Do you have a personal grudge against x and y?
And since I must get at your level in order for you to understand at least a word from my post, I'll say something about your last sentence: Ditto.
You turn.
They are most certainly not selling the fire at a loss. Archos have sold such tablets for years at around the same pricepoint, and believe me, they're making money out of them.
cnet might disagree with all their theoretical computations of course. But who cares?
I think your goal is to make me angry, but alas, I am in a good mood today. I even feel like feeding a good hairy mountain troll. These things can be funny at times.
In my original post, I said "Stop digging". I can only reassert this advice which, even though you've dug yourself a whole lot deeper now, is still the best thing I think you should do.
Just my $0.02 of course, YMMV.
This, and the fact that politicians talk stuff that people understand. Make people learn science, politicians will have to.
Simple, really. Not realistic, but simple.
Ummm, ok. I think.
Does it run on my bsd-powered toaster?
I'm sure you can toast the 4096 of them allright.
The first was the Witkar in Amsterdam more than 35 years ago.
Didn't you read TFS? It said "world's first electric car share program" !!! It also says the "largest", but since it's the first, I think it's a given.
So stop spreading FUD and surrender to your great robotic slashdot overlord.
Have a nice day.
wake ur mum's face up.
article said 5 years. i said 5 years. you said 2 years.
you're an idiot.
Dude. Stop digging.
Different story means different tune from different ACs.
Same here. I have two 45U bays in my garage. a few servers in those bays. A Linux desktop. HDHomerun in the attic. Media centers all across the house. And I bought my wife an iPad.
Well, see right there I know you're making this up, because no one with 90U in their garage and a linux desktop has ever kissed a girl, much less married one.
Ok, it was an accident, so? Stuff happens !
Same here. I have two 45U bays in my garage. a few servers in those bays. A Linux desktop. HDHomerun in the attic. Media centers all across the house. And I bought my wife an iPad. Everyone's happy, except those people that think that owning an iPad makes you a stupid moronic cretin. But I don't give a rat's ass about them, so all is well in the end.
There's nothing worse than Apple fanboys. Except Apple haters.
Let's take JFK. From Wikipedia:
In 2010, the airport handled 46,514,154 passengers
2% of that is almost a million people. Every year. Now, let's assume handling each these false positives is the work of an hour on average. That's about a million hours spent.
Let's assume a workday of 8 hours, and 250 workdays a year. That's about 2000 hours a year for an average worker. So it'll take 500 people to track these false positives at JFK.
I think it's a little unacceptable, but YMMV of course.
Actually, mine does and yes, we're baking ceramics paint.
When the power goes, we won't be able to watch a single video anymore.