These are old documents. Assuming they are black and white scans or original sources in simple text based formats, you're probably looking at less than 100TB of data. Any medium sized business could build out the infrastructure to search that.
Nah, evil always finds its way to the top. The bottom must be unwilling to comply. It's a case of do you blame Hitler, or blame millions of Germans who followed his direction. In reality, both are to blame, but the followers who carry out the actual acts of evil bear more responsibility (how many Jews did Hitler personally kill?)
Right, they participate in maintaining the overly complex legal system which is a drain on business and productivity for all of our society. We all make our own choices about how we contribute to the world, and we're responsible for those choices.
All the results are the same, except for a couple of news stories, but they could have cheated on those. Seems like a titanic waste to have put all this effort into one search word, for no improvement.
They're all evil until proven good. The problem with the reputation of lawyers as a class is that the majority of them have proven themselves willing to take frivolous or evil cases and pursue them to the best of their ability. If you stand in the service of evil, expect to be rightly derided and hated.
The water flows through, so you dip it into the water like it was a big bucket, or imagine a fish net designed to catch oil. You come away with nothing but oil inside your 'net'.
And the elite aren't just headed for having their own race, they are headed for speciation (and have in a few cases already demonstrated success, though people are quite reluctant to talk about that).
I think there's a presumption that there is a certain value in having news reporting agencies around that goes beyond their ability to send their output to print and make money.
That might or might not be correct, but that's really what you have to argue: is there value in having professional reporting organizations.
Well, I think the existing rules are clear enough. A human is conceived via sex between a man and a woman. Anything else isn't human, doesn't have human rights. That's why in-vitro children are, legally speaking, pets belonging to their parents.
It's not the fishing term, but that's beside the point. The fact that they do actual research doesn't help their case, they need to stop patenting the obvious to be clear of the scorn heaped upon the trolls. I could spend my days filing for obvious patents, calling it research, and hoping a major company stumbles into my quagmire too. That wouldn't make me not a troll, that would make me the definition of a troll.
The problem is that actual working methods are a dime a dozen. A patent is supposed to be non-obvious too, and that's whats missing. Oh, and the ripped off part too, since none of the companies with this tech is being accused of stealing it, they're being accused of reinventing.
Random links? I posted a link to the definition of science, and the wikipedia definition for ID. I'd hardly call that 'random'.
Definition 2 (the definition for 'a science' as opposed to 'science': 2 a : a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study
Note also that this precedes the definition 3, though one might conclude that definition 3 is what slashdotters would prefer to argue about:
3 a : knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method
I'd then encourage you to read the ID article and weigh honestly whether or not it meets the definition. I think the evidence that it is a failed scientific theory is ironclad.
It is almost impossible in the US to get a patent overturned for obviousness. It has happened a handful of times (I believe less than 10, but I'm having difficulty finding an appropriate citation). Even if you can demonstrate prior art it is extremely expensive, to the tune of millions of dollars of litigation. I expect that the patent licensing fees were less than the expected cost of litigation.
The conventional definition of patent troll is definitely a body who 'develops' some obvious piece of technology, but never commercializes or publicizes it, instead waiting and hoping for some other group to do the obvious thing, and then to have to pay them big money for having done nothing.
The key element of the trolling problem is that the invention is obvious, but got through the patenting process because the patent office is overwhelmed and incompetent. The supposed 'invention' is being invented over and over again because EVERY engineer comes to the same conclusion when faced with the problem. Nobody is stealing CSIROs ideas and commercializing them, they are coming up with the SAME ideas and commercializing them. Patents were not intended to reward the first to write down every obvious idea, but that is what they have become, and those who abuse the process are labeled trolls.
I'd say it would happen something along the lines of the tea party movement. Get liked by one side of the MSM more than the existing party representing that media. In this case, FOX, tired of the Republicans hewing too close to the center, decided to throw in their lot with the tea party.
I don't know about the particular nominated game (fantastic contraption), but there are all kinds of games on armor games that will eat 100% of one core of a cpu for trivial animations and logic that should eat perhaps 3-5%. Compare what you get out of flash vs what you get out of a 10 year old pc-game for example. The 10 year old pc game will have better graphics for almost no cpu cost. I don't know if the flash engineers are incompetent, or are forbidden to use double buffering, or the dx apis or something, but the performance of flash is atrocious.
Slashdot Mirror
These are old documents. Assuming they are black and white scans or original sources in simple text based formats, you're probably looking at less than 100TB of data. Any medium sized business could build out the infrastructure to search that.
Nah, evil always finds its way to the top. The bottom must be unwilling to comply. It's a case of do you blame Hitler, or blame millions of Germans who followed his direction. In reality, both are to blame, but the followers who carry out the actual acts of evil bear more responsibility (how many Jews did Hitler personally kill?)
Right, they participate in maintaining the overly complex legal system which is a drain on business and productivity for all of our society. We all make our own choices about how we contribute to the world, and we're responsible for those choices.
http://tinyurl.com/268rtm6
All the results are the same, except for a couple of news stories, but they could have cheated on those. Seems like a titanic waste to have put all this effort into one search word, for no improvement.
They're all evil until proven good. The problem with the reputation of lawyers as a class is that the majority of them have proven themselves willing to take frivolous or evil cases and pursue them to the best of their ability. If you stand in the service of evil, expect to be rightly derided and hated.
There are literally tons of data to back that up. Think harder. :-)
Seadead, given the oil, so I don't think it is going to mind, much. The net dead animals will be reduced by getting the oil out ASAP, I'm sure.
Right, no waste management issues with those at all.
Odds are good that if you are looking at het porn, you didn't get exposed to much BPA.
Oh, they're all bad. Ones containing BPA are just worse.
The water flows through, so you dip it into the water like it was a big bucket, or imagine a fish net designed to catch oil. You come away with nothing but oil inside your 'net'.
What do you do when you run out of wind?
IVF not involving sex was exactly my point.
And the elite aren't just headed for having their own race, they are headed for speciation (and have in a few cases already demonstrated success, though people are quite reluctant to talk about that).
I think there's a presumption that there is a certain value in having news reporting agencies around that goes beyond their ability to send their output to print and make money.
That might or might not be correct, but that's really what you have to argue: is there value in having professional reporting organizations.
Typically consent is required by signs posted outside the premises for entry onto the private property.
Well, I think the existing rules are clear enough. A human is conceived via sex between a man and a woman. Anything else isn't human, doesn't have human rights. That's why in-vitro children are, legally speaking, pets belonging to their parents.
After a hard day at work, the artists and geologists can't afford the high priced brews.
And I think the original joke was that there's no such thing as a hard day's work for a HFT, which isn't true for the geologist.
It's not the fishing term, but that's beside the point.
The fact that they do actual research doesn't help their case, they need to stop patenting the obvious to be clear of the scorn heaped upon the trolls. I could spend my days filing for obvious patents, calling it research, and hoping a major company stumbles into my quagmire too. That wouldn't make me not a troll, that would make me the definition of a troll.
The problem is that actual working methods are a dime a dozen. A patent is supposed to be non-obvious too, and that's whats missing. Oh, and the ripped off part too, since none of the companies with this tech is being accused of stealing it, they're being accused of reinventing.
Random links? I posted a link to the definition of science, and the wikipedia definition for ID. I'd hardly call that 'random'.
Definition 2 (the definition for 'a science' as opposed to 'science':
2 a : a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study
Note also that this precedes the definition 3, though one might conclude that definition 3 is what slashdotters would prefer to argue about:
3 a : knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method
I'd then encourage you to read the ID article and weigh honestly whether or not it meets the definition. I think the evidence that it is a failed scientific theory is ironclad.
It is almost impossible in the US to get a patent overturned for obviousness. It has happened a handful of times (I believe less than 10, but I'm having difficulty finding an appropriate citation). Even if you can demonstrate prior art it is extremely expensive, to the tune of millions of dollars of litigation. I expect that the patent licensing fees were less than the expected cost of litigation.
The conventional definition of patent troll is definitely a body who 'develops' some obvious piece of technology, but never commercializes or publicizes it, instead waiting and hoping for some other group to do the obvious thing, and then to have to pay them big money for having done nothing.
The key element of the trolling problem is that the invention is obvious, but got through the patenting process because the patent office is overwhelmed and incompetent. The supposed 'invention' is being invented over and over again because EVERY engineer comes to the same conclusion when faced with the problem. Nobody is stealing CSIROs ideas and commercializing them, they are coming up with the SAME ideas and commercializing them. Patents were not intended to reward the first to write down every obvious idea, but that is what they have become, and those who abuse the process are labeled trolls.
CSIRO are trolls.
I'd say it would happen something along the lines of the tea party movement. Get liked by one side of the MSM more than the existing party representing that media. In this case, FOX, tired of the Republicans hewing too close to the center, decided to throw in their lot with the tea party.
I don't know about the particular nominated game (fantastic contraption), but there are all kinds of games on armor games that will eat 100% of one core of a cpu for trivial animations and logic that should eat perhaps 3-5%. Compare what you get out of flash vs what you get out of a 10 year old pc-game for example. The 10 year old pc game will have better graphics for almost no cpu cost. I don't know if the flash engineers are incompetent, or are forbidden to use double buffering, or the dx apis or something, but the performance of flash is atrocious.
Get to work making android the preferred platform of, well, everybody.