Slashdot Mirror


The Race To Beer With 50% Alcohol By Volume

ElectricSteve writes "Most of the world's beer has between 4% and 6% alcohol by volume (ABV). The strength of beer achieved by traditional fermentation brewing methods has limits, but a well-crafted beer that is repeatedly 'freeze distilled' can achieve exquisite qualities and much higher alcohol concentrations. An escalation in the use of this relatively new methodology over the last 12 months has seen man's favorite beverage suddenly move into the 40+% ABV realm of spirits such as gin, rum, brandy, whiskey, and vodka, creating a new category of extreme beer. The world's strongest beer was 27% ABV, but amidst an informal contest to claim the title of the world's strongest beer, the top beer has jumped in strength dramatically. This week Gizmag spoke to the brewers at the center of the escalating competition. New contestants are gathering, and the race is now on to break 50% alcohol by volume."

297 comments

  1. After a hard days work by dintech · · Score: 1

    After a hard days work, we know what high frequency traders drink...

    1. Re:After a hard days work by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 1

      Or smoke?

    2. Re:After a hard days work by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fairly sure it'd be pretty hard to smoke beer. What are you smoking?

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    3. Re:After a hard days work by tsalmark · · Score: 1

      at 50% ABV it'll burn real good.

    4. Re:After a hard days work by FreonTrip · · Score: 1

      Along with high-frequency traders, include lawyers, people in the arts, and geologists. I've yet to encounter other career paths that result in so many high-functioning alcoholics.

    5. Re:After a hard days work by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      The computers are drinking beer now? We're certainly doomed.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    6. Re:After a hard days work by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Fairly sure it'd be pretty hard to smoke beer.
      Rauchbier
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoked_beer

      It's not an everyday sort of beer, but goes great with some meals.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    7. Re:After a hard days work by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      A vitamin rich sludge to help their skin maintain its healthy slime. But what does that have to do with beer?

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    8. Re:After a hard days work by _merlin · · Score: 1

      I work in the high-frequency trading business. Our office fridge contains:

      • Little Creatures Pale Ale
      • Peroni
      • Stella Artois
      • Cascade Premium Lager
    9. Re:After a hard days work by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Vegemite?

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    10. Re:After a hard days work by Surt · · Score: 1

      After a hard day at work, the artists and geologists can't afford the high priced brews.

      And I think the original joke was that there's no such thing as a hard day's work for a HFT, which isn't true for the geologist.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    11. Re:After a hard days work by Creepy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I recently shared a Rauchbier (literally smoke beer in German) with friends just to try it - in fact, I had the Bamberg pictured in that link. The consensus was it was a strange tasting beer with lingering flavors of smoked bacon, which is a bit too odd of a combo for me. I've had an Eisbock (literally Ice Bock and Bock is a place - it is derived from Einbeck, where the style was first brewed) before, but it was more in the 18% ABV range and a bit bitter for my tastes, but the India Pale Ale fan of my friends loved it (IPAs are pale ales with extra hops [a preservative] originally used to survive long trips - like England to India, and this beer tasted IPA-ish, so may have been extra-hopped, as well). I've also recently had a Gruit, which is an unhopped beer - it was very good and different, and not malty like I expected - the flavors of anise, nutmeg and cinnamon stood out.

      My personal tastes tend to be about 20-50IBU (International Bitterness Units), which excludes most Pilsners (after Pilsen, originally in Bohemia, now Czech) and IPAs, which hopheads love. I still like to mix it up and try lots of oddities. My wife prefers schwartzbier (black beer) - preferably Köstritzer (and I drive 25 miles to a specialty store to get it, which is why I often end up with a bunch of oddities to try, as well), but New Belgium's 1554 will do in a pinch.

    12. Re:After a hard days work by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      My personal tastes tend to be about 20-50IBU (International Bitterness Units), which excludes most Pilsners (after Pilsen, originally in Bohemia, now Czech) and IPAs, which hopheads love. I still like to mix it up and try lots of oddities. My wife prefers schwartzbier (black beer) - preferably Köstritzer (and I drive 25 miles to a specialty store to get it, which is why I often end up with a bunch of oddities to try, as well), but New Belgium's 1554 will do in a pinch.

      There was a big problem for me in the USA for a while, it seemed like every microbrewery was trying to 'outHop' each other and the result was, for people who don't care for the high bitterness, rather worrisome.

      Thankfully that trend has tapered off a bit.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    13. Re:After a hard days work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tried Rauchbier at a beer festival a couple of years back. I've a fairly wide palate - I like everything from Belgian Lambic fruit beers, through IPAs to dark and treacly stouts (the latter being my beer of choice). Without doubt, Rauchbier is one of the oddest I've tasted.

      It started off with a pleasantly smokey flavour, quite arresting - but by the time I'd had about quarter of a litre it became rather heavy going. By the end of the bottle it was like drinking a kipper smoothie.

      I don't regret trying it out, but that's one beer that's a bit out of my comfort zone.

    14. Re:After a hard days work by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      One of the few things that I don't like about one of my favorite restaurants is the fact that the majority of their beers are pale ales/India pale ales - all of them are quite hoppy. Apparently the staff there likes hoppy.

      I, however, don't. I tend to prefer more "roasty" flavors - porters, imperial stouts.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    15. Re:After a hard days work by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      Along with high-frequency traders, include lawyers, people in the arts, and geologists. I've yet to encounter other career paths that result in so many high-functioning alcoholics.

      Don't forget engineers! We're alcoholics too! :)
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    16. Re:After a hard days work by Creepy · · Score: 1

      I won't say anything about the first and last because I know nothing about them, but mass produced Italian beers... eew, you can do so much better - that is almost as bad as that crap out of the Netherlands, Heineken (which is also probably the best beer I've had from the Netherlands... Amsterdam was not my favorite city for beer, but they did have good coffee and apparently good pot [which isn't my thing, but my travel-mates loved it]). Those are all pretty much exactly the same as American beers (they all use similar hops) but without the cheap rice that make American beers even more nasty and cheaper to brew, so yes, a step up, but not a giant leap.

          I also wasn't fond of the beers in and around Bonn or Frankfurt (very light, bitter, and Pils heavy... and the color of piss water when you barely had to take a pee) - I vastly preferred the ones I got in Bavaria, Tirol, and northern France, but ironically not central Munich outside of Octoberfest beers, but I only hit a couple - Munich has a ton of breweries and I only scratched the surface.

      For blondes I like a nice French Biere de Garde or Saison, pretty much all Belgians (which can pretty much run the table from light to dark), or maybe a Boddingtons or other British light or pale ale (NOT IPAs though, which are preservative heavy with extra hops), as I find them refreshing and not overpowering (either in hops or alcohol).

    17. Re:After a hard days work by haruharaharu · · Score: 1

      American beer doesn't use rice - if it's got rice, it ain't beer. Spend a year in seattle and you'll stop bitching about our beer - we have everything.

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    18. Re:After a hard days work by Evtim · · Score: 1

      Next time you are in Amsterdam, go to Belgium beer bar. Try Quack (served in funny round bottom glasses that need wooden frame and handle). It's my favorite. Be careful though, its rather strong...

    19. Re:After a hard days work by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I've cleared 23% with just honey and fruit in a stout recipe. That's where you start to feel the burn. It's also the edge of where beer is still enjoyable. I can't imagine wanting more alcohol in beer than that. Think of bourbon, tequila or scotch in the realm of moonshine ABV. Yuck.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    20. Re:After a hard days work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fairly sure it'd be pretty hard to smoke beer. What are you smoking?

      Huh? I've got 2 bomber bottles of it in the fridge right now Stone Breweries Smoked Porter is easy to find at any decent beer vendor.

    21. Re:After a hard days work by JustABlitheringIdiot · · Score: 1

      Smoked beer is awesome. Some of the best I've had was in Montreal. It tastes a little strange at first and most of them tend to be darker brews (porters and stouts mostly) but smoked beer is absolutely worth trying.

  2. But what about taste? by cavis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If this tastes like crap, then no one will buy it... well, except for frat boys and the local street people.

    1. Re:But what about taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with this. Hell, I just bought a local dark brew that's 16% and it tasted like ass, but everybody was crowing about it.

      If you want hard booze, drink hard booze. Pumping up the alcohol content in beer just for the sake of doing it is pointless if it taste horrible.

    2. Re:But what about taste? by crow_t_robot · · Score: 1
      I am street people, you insensitive clod!

      No, but seriously, I have enjoyed high gravity (read: malt liquor) for 10+ years. Maybe I'm a weirdo but I really don't enjoy going to a bar and paying 3-4 dollars for a Bud Light when I can stop at the gas station beforehand and get 40oz of 9% beer for $1.50.

    3. Re:But what about taste? by WarlockSquire · · Score: 1

      I've had the Brewdog Tokyo (18%+) and it was extremely drinkable... it's a mix of a strong double bock and a brandy, but with none of the 2 week old gym sock funk of an aged beer.

    4. Re:But what about taste? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      If you want hard booze, drink hard booze

      When I was young and poor I used to buy everclear. Oz for oz it's the cheapest way to get drunk. My favorite way to consume it was to mix it with Snapple. Drink two or three shots worth of snapple and refill the empty space with Everclear. You'll be smashed in short order and the best part is that you can barely taste the alcohol.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:But what about taste? by Thansal · · Score: 1

      There are a number of high ABV beers out there that ARE good.

      The obvious one to me is Three Philosophers, which is made by Ommegang, a NY based Belgian brewery. It's about 10% ABV iirc, and very good. Most of Ommegang's beers are relatively high ABV, yet still good.

      I think I have also had something up to 16% ABV that I liked (can't remember the name currently), and I have also had plenty of high test beers that sucked, probably about in proportion to normal beers that suck though.

      That being said, I have next to no interest in these ultra high ABV beers. They are no longer beer, and are now distilled spirits. I kinda doubt they taste all that good, and I'm fairly sure they would not be worth what ever the ridiculous asking price is.

      I mean, if some one offered me some I would take it (I'm a curious drinker), but I'm not going to seek it out.

      --
      Do Or Do Not, There Is No Spoon, There Is Only Zuul. Everything in the above post is probably opinion.
    6. Re:But what about taste? by SquareVoid · · Score: 1

      I can't say much about other high ABV beers, but Dogfish head's 120 minute IPA (about 18%) is not drank like your typical beer. You drink it at slightly colder than room temperature over a period of an hour. It is a beer you sip, and it will mess you up if you are unaware of its kick.

    7. Re:But what about taste? by oldspewey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow. Who knew Jeff Foxworthy had a slashdot account!

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    8. Re:But what about taste? by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, back in my college days we drank plenty of Everclear, we'd take shots and chase it with Boone's. It's a completely different type of drunk, like the speedball of booze, completely smashed yet energized.

    9. Re:But what about taste? by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Brewdog know their stuff - I haven't tried their strong ones, but judging from the Punk IPA and the Paradox, you can't go wrong with them. Damn shame I have to import the stuff from Scotland for horrible shipping costs.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    10. Re:But what about taste? by sleigher · · Score: 1

      I had a beer in Germany named Highlander a number of years back. It was a medium lager but had whisky in it. It was really, really good. I was amazed at just how good a beer could taste with hard spirits in it. I have looked for a long time for that beer and never found it again.

      --
      All points of time and space are connected.
    11. Re:But what about taste? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Because no one drinks Whiskey, or Rye. Try drinking that stuff, straight up no junk. Tell me how awesome it tastes. Then ask if it sells.

    12. Re:But what about taste? by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      The bane of my college existence was jungle juice. Everclear and fruit punch with slices of fruit in a cooler. I would drink a few cups of that and then not remember anything else.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    13. Re:But what about taste? by __aamnbm3774 · · Score: 1

      nobody enjoys overpaying for anything.

      but there are other reasons why people are willing to pay premiums.

    14. Re:But what about taste? by eln · · Score: 1

      If you drink beer for the taste, rather than to get drunk, then you will not enjoy really high alcohol beers at all. Good beer has a lot of complex and subtle flavors in it, and at a certain point the taste of the alcohol itself starts to overwhelm all of them. IPAs are generally in the 7-9% range, and in my experience that's about as high as you can go before you really start to taste the alcohol itself.

      On the other hand, the fact that the essentially tasteless but cheap macrobrews are so popular leads me to believe that the market for people who drink beer purely to get drunk is large enough to make money from this.

    15. Re:But what about taste? by billybacs · · Score: 0

      IMHO, it tastes terrible too. the 90 minute ale is the sweet-spot for me. Chimay sort of reminds me of the 120-minute ale, but has a lighter taste to it (it's still only 9% but eh). I recently found out about Chimay the other day and love it almost as much of Belhaven and Boddington's.

    16. Re:But what about taste? by justin12345 · · Score: 1

      Oh man jungle juice was the worst. I was once at a party at the University of Delaware, mostly engineering undergrads. They filled a bathtub with Everclear and CoolAid powder, no water at all except melting ice. Then they played "beer" pong with it. I have absolutely no idea how no one died.

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
    17. Re:But what about taste? by hamburger+lady · · Score: 2, Funny

      we drank plenty of Everclear, we'd take shots and chase it with Boone's

      jesus, you started with something tough and ended with the dainty beverage of snow-white queens.

      what then, scotch with a zima chaser? rye followed by a cosmo?

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    18. Re:But what about taste? by justin12345 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dogfish Head 120 is pretty decent as far as "high test" beers go, and you're right about how its best enjoyed. Honestly everything Dogfish Head makes is pretty decent. I'd even go so far as to say my favorite beer of all beers is their 60 Minute IPA.

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
    19. Re:But what about taste? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Because no one drinks Whiskey, or Rye. Try drinking that stuff, straight up no junk. Tell me how awesome it tastes.

      Pretty awesome, if you don't get the cheap stuff. There's a big range between a nice single-malt, and whatever cheap stuff your local watering hole puts on the rail.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    20. Re:But what about taste? by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      Still is the cheapest around here. As a tight, yet not frugal, person, I buy a half gallon for 32 USD including taxes (31.84 IIRC) Two different drinks 1) one part everclear, one par sunny D, one part sprite and a shot of lime juice 2) one part coke zero, one part everclear, one part sprite When you use 4oz as the part, it doesn't take but one glass in an hour to feel really good, and three glasses in an hour and a half makes the night disappear.

    21. Re:But what about taste? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      As far as high kick goes, I found the Dogfish Fort quite enjoyable (YMMV Though).

      My favorite of theirs is the Squall IPA which I believe is essentially the 90 Minute, but unfiltered.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    22. Re:But what about taste? by mini+me · · Score: 1

      I once visited a brewpub that had a 16% beer on tap, among others. The 16% beer was, to my taste buds, the most enjoyable drink of them all. To be honest, was I was actually quite surprised that it could taste so good. Strong alcohol content beers can taste horrible, but they do not have to taste horrible.

    23. Re:But what about taste? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Back in my university days, I made homebrew in residence to save money. Then I taught the other guys on my floor how to make it, and loaned them my equipment, leading to a peak production of 70 dozen beer per week on our floor. You wanna bet the women liked partying on OUR floor. :)

      Personally, I don't think you can call what these guys are making beer.

      Soaking it in whiskey barrels, for example... cheating. People buy those barrels and fill them with water, then let the alcohol soak out of them and drink it... they call it swish. Not just adding "flavour" with those barrels.

      Using fractional freezing techniques to make it stronger is about as novel as leaving your apple cider out in the snow and separating the frozen stuff out. Personally, I wouldn't call it "beer" either after it's been treated this way.

      I can see why it's expensive though. Each time you freeze and filter it, the concentration of alcohol in the frozen material increases, until you're just throwing away alcohol and not concentrating it at all. So, making one of those super strong ice hardened beers involves a large amount of waste, assuming you're not taking the "ice" and firing it into a conventional still to recover the loss.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_freezing

      We're getting ready to do it ourselves here at home, because operating a still is illegal, but freezing your wine isn't. We're using champagne yeast, apple juice, grape juice, blackberry juice, blueberry juice, dextrose and honey.

      I almost broke the world record for strongest beer back the 80s... did my junior high school science fair project on brewing, and made an IPA that was 11.5% at a time when the record was 12%. Wish I'd been allowed to drink it :P

      I should make a beer using starch as an adsorbent. Call it Beershine or something.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    24. Re:But what about taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why stop there? You are paying $1.50 for a 40 oz when straight rubbing alcohol will get you messed up all day long for $2. So no, you aren't a weirdo, you are just an alcoholic. People go to bars to socialize with other people while they drink. You prefer to get annihilated by yourself as fast and cheaply as possible drinking a 40 out of a paper bag in the alley.

      P.S. You don't "enjoy" high grav malt liquor. You choke it down because it gets you wasted. It is the being wasted part you "enjoy".

    25. Re:But what about taste? by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      there are plenty of high %age brews out there that are very drinkable and locally available (at least here in Rochester, NY they are)

      Dogfish head's 120 minute IPA is excellent, drink it in a snifter two ounces at a time. I think I get this around $18 a 4 pack? I could be way off here.

      Sam Adams Utopias, 24%, $15/ounce, drink from a snifter, worth every penny.

      Sam Adams Imperial Stout is a great stout, thick and hearty, though less alcohol than Dogfish Head's, correspondingly easier to drink. I think I've paid $12 a 4 pack for this.

      Brooklyn Black Chocolate Stout %10, excellent, would buy again A++, $12 a 4 pack?

      Goose Island's Bourbon County Stout, 13%, 2x as expensive as the Sam Adams Imperial Stout, a great snifter beer. $24 a 4 pack. They make a coffee stout in this type too, also excellent.

      Thankfully we have a huge selection of great beer everywhere from Wegmans (groceries) to Hess (yes, some gas stations around here carry an excellent variety), to our favorite "Beers of the World".

      When someone wants a favor, and offers beer, these are the ones I request.

    26. Re:But what about taste? by justin12345 · · Score: 1

      Mostly these high ABV beers are just novelties. I've had a few good ones from Dogfish Head, but you have to sip them like you would scotch or brandy. Usually its customary to split a single 12 ounce bottle with one or two other people. If you are looking to get drunk on the cheap, malt liquor is the way to go as the high ABV beers are generally really expensive.

      If they start getting up to the 50% mark, you might get some interesting mixed drinks out of them. At that point they would start resembling whiskey, except with hops. I could see that mixing well, though it would take some experimentation to find out what.

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
    27. Re:But what about taste? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Depends on whether or not the taste of smoke and peat moss is appealing to you. Some people seem to really enjoy it.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    28. Re:But what about taste? by justin12345 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the hooker out behind the gas station negotiates up front and generally delivers services as negotiated. Who knows if the sorostitute you're buying expensive girly drinks for at the bar will ever put out. The STDs tend to be more bang for your buck too.

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
    29. Re:But what about taste? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      You'd be better off buying a flask.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    30. Re:But what about taste? by Mad-Bassist · · Score: 1

      Mwahahahahaaa! I remember an occasion where I took a two liter 7-Up bottle that was three-quarters full, and refilled it with Night Train. Everyone liked it until I told them what it was. I called it a Wino Cooler.

      I've had good and bad barley wine, but going over 20% sounds excessive to me. It may as well be carbonated whisky!

      It wouldn't surprise me if someone comes up with a continuous process for ice distilling that isn't labor intensive. It probably already exists somewhere in industry and is waiting to be adapted.

      --
      "The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
    31. Re:But what about taste? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Based on the taste of the "high-gravity" beers that have been coming to market lately, I think I'll stick to drinking the traditional brews.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    32. Re:But what about taste? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Since you're in NYS - Try to find some of Southern Tier's "Blackwater Series" imperial stouts. Typically 10-12% ABV, sold only in 22 ounce bottles. Their Creme Brulee is amazing, the Mokah (mix of Jahvah and Choklat) is really good, and the Jahvah and Choklat on their own are quite good too. Right now they're on my list of favorite beers. Finger Lakes Beverage Center in Ithaca usually has some of ST's stouts, not sure about locations closer to Roch. Wegmans doesn't carry those particular Southern Tier beers in Ithaca or Johnson City, but might in the Roch area.

      Utopias is great, although it tastes more like a brandy than a beer.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    33. Re:But what about taste? by TempeTerra · · Score: 1

      If you think a cosmopolitan is a soft option, you're not drinking the right cosmopolitans

      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
    34. Re:But what about taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're getting ready to do it ourselves here at home, because operating a still is illegal, but freezing your wine isn't.

      Where is home? From the link that you provided:

      Freeze distillation of alcoholic beverages is illegal in many countries

    35. Re:But what about taste? by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      I..... excuse me? Are you taking the position that straight whiskey, straight rye, are undrinkable?
      That has to be one of the most uninformed opinions I've seen offered on slashdot ever. I *only* drink my whiskey (and scotch, bourbon, and rye) straight. Sometimes ice is involved, sometimes not, but always delicious.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    36. Re:But what about taste? by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      Southern Tier makes some of the greatest stuff out there. I agree, the Creme Brulee is one of the best beers ever.

    37. Re:But what about taste? by bigredradio · · Score: 1

      Big fan of the 90 minute. I agree, they do make a tasty beverage.

    38. Re:But what about taste? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Doppelbocks often exceed that and taste great. High alcohol does not have to mean bad taste.

    39. Re:But what about taste? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Hm. I seem to remember working it out and 1.75 L of Paramount 40% gin for $11.87 (if I remember correctly, after tax) was cheaper ounce-for-ounce of alcohol. I might have to check again, or maybe you were just getting a good deal on Everclear...

      The gin was actually pretty palatable... I liked it better than the Paramount vodka (also 40%, and cost the same amount).

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    40. Re:But what about taste? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      FYI, rubbing alcohol (so-called “denatured” alcohol) has poison added to it. Drinking it is highly inadvisable.

      This so-called “denatured” alcohol is called that because “denaturing” agents have been added to it. So what precise “nature” of the concoction do they wish to remove, you might ask?

      Drinkability.

      Otherwise it’d be taxed as an alcoholic beverage, which would make its price exorbitantly high (because the taxes on alcoholic beverages are exorbitantly high).

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    41. Re:But what about taste? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      How is distilled Christmas tree palatable?

    42. Re:But what about taste? by moortak · · Score: 1

      The Creme Brulee is tasty, but makes for a terrible breakfast drink. One of the local bars has a nice brunch and I thought I'd grab a drink to go with it, way to heavy for morning.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    43. Re:But what about taste? by haruharaharu · · Score: 1

      120 is pretty much undrinkable. 90 minute IPA is great, though - good thing, too, since the 120 is $10/bottle.

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    44. Re:But what about taste? by Yaur · · Score: 1

      rubbing alcohol == isopropyl alcohol
      denatured alcohol == ethanol + a denaturing agent (e.g. acetone)
      Obviously neither should be consumed

    45. Re:But what about taste? by justin12345 · · Score: 1

      I'd say the opposite. 120 is good in small amounts (4-6oz) on special occasions, sipped like cognac. 90 is too sweet to drink as a everyday beer, but lacks the uniqueness of the 120, it falls into the no man's land of "why bother". 60 obviously is an everyday beer.

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
    46. Re:But what about taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Itake it you also bring http://www.bumwine.com/ [bumwine.com] to your fancy pants greasy spoon diner when you want a "steak".

    47. Re:But what about taste? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Rubbing alcohol actually means poisoned ethanol, but common use has confused it with isopropyl alcohol...

      Rubbing alcohol, USP / B.P. is a liquid prepared and used primarily for topical application. It is prepared from a special denatured alcohol solution and contains 97.5-100% by volume of pure, concentrated ethanol (ethyl alcohol). Individual manufacturers can use their own "formulation standards" in which the ethanol content usually ranges from 70-99% v/v. In the UK the equivalent skin preparation is surgical spirit which is always based on an ethyl alcohol-methyl alcohol mixture.

      The term "rubbing alcohol" has become a general non-specific term for either isopropyl alcohol (isopropanol) or ethyl alcohol (ethanol) rubbing-alcohol products. The confusion comes from the greater popularity of isopropyl rubbing alcohol, and as a result, individuals requesting "rubbing alcohol" generally expect and get an isopropyl alcohol product.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    48. Re:But what about taste? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Pfff, like Paramount uses real christmas trees in their gin? It’s the cheapest stuff you can buy.

      OTOH I noticed a new gin from a local distillery and figured I’d try it... didn’t really like it all that much. They do make good vodka though and since they’re local the price is very reasonable.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    49. Re:But what about taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually freezing your wine is considered illegal. Not that I think the ATF will come looking for you. Freeze fractionation is considered a form of distillation. Freezing hard cider to do this gives you a product called apple jack, certainly not a new idea. So I agree that calling it beer is a stretch.

    50. Re:But what about taste? by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      Beers of the World carries some of them. I'll give 'em a try! thanks!

  3. erm ... by Stooshie · · Score: 4, Informative

    We have had distilled beer in Scotland for years now. We call it, erm let me think ... oh yes, whisky!

    --
    America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    1. Re:erm ... by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 1

      In the states, we call distilled rye beer scotch. ;)

    2. Re:erm ... by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was about to say the same things - once you distill it, it's no longer beer.

    3. Re:erm ... by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      And still, (rimshot) freeze-distilled beer is nothing like whisky. Whisky is brewed without hops, as you probably know. This is just regular beer that's been concentrated by having the water removed.

    4. Re:erm ... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yeah more like freeze dried.

      --
    5. Re:erm ... by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      It's not the lack of hops that makes the difference between whisky and beer it's the removal of the water by, er... distillation. Distillation can be done by freezing or evaporation. They even call it distillation in the article.

      Even if you think the hops make a difference, they still end up with distilled spirit rather than a brewed liquid.

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    6. Re:erm ... by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      It may be distilled, but it's certainly not anything like whisky. For one, whisky doesn't contain any of the residual sugar after fermentation, as sugar isn't evaporated together with alcohol etc., whereas freeze-distilling leaves the sugar in the beer/spirit.

    7. Re:erm ... by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      Why would you say that? This is nothing like freeze drying, beyond the fact that there is water removal going on. It's not as though they are making powdered beer.

      Just as a review for those who didn't RFTA:

      Essentially, the ambient temperature of the beer is lowered to between the temperatures that water and alcohol freeze at, while agitating or stirring the beer. This allows the water to crystallize out of the beer, while preventing it from forming a giant block. At precisely the right moment, before the ice crystals grow large enough to begin encapsulating the alcohol, the beer is decanted and filtered to remove the ice crystals, then returned to the barrel and the process begins again. It's actually NOT a complex process. The only tricky part is timing the decant and filter stage.

      If any of you remember the "Ice Brewed" beer fad back in the 1990's, this is just the natural progression of that process, only done in boutique quantities, with a more refined process and better materials. Admittedly, crappy Coors beer isn't made all that much better by ice brewing, thus the 1990's fad died. But if you start with a high quality product, such as the Sam Adams Utopia beers do, then you end up with a really fantastic result.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    8. Re:erm ... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      > Why would you say that?

      Coz I forgot what freeze drying was :).

      --
    9. Re:erm ... by treeves · · Score: 1

      I thought ice brewing was a low temperature *brewing* process, not fractional crystallization to remove water.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    10. Re:erm ... by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 1

      And hopefully it's sold in a way that clearly differentiates it from beer or alcohol poisoning and drunk driving will skyrocket. People have expectations with beer. Most (large) people expect to barely feel 2 beers. By the time the alcohol hits them, fast drinkers who wanted to try something new could be starting number 3, putting them at 20 5% beers worth of alcohol when they were expecting to be driving home.

      This relies on them not noticing that they're drinking 50% alcohol. Unlikely with beer, but I don't know what this tastes like and I've had drinks that were 30% that I wouldn't have known had any alcohol in them if I hadn't gotten drunk from them.

      I can also see a whole lot of dirtbags handing girls "just a beer" that is actually 10 beers.

      I have zero problem with them making it, but I really hope they don't sell this in draft form or it tastes like it's dissolving your lungs.

    11. Re:erm ... by eharvill · · Score: 1

      I agree. Last year I picked up a "Sierra Nevada Bigfoot" as I had never seen or had one before. Sat down on the couch and drank it down in 5 or 10 minutes. Got up a few minutes later and had a 2 second dizzy spell. I thought that was odd. Checked the bottle and it was 9.6% ABV. Normally 2 or 3 "regular" beers wouldn't even phase me, but I don't drink 2-3 beers in a 5-10 minute span normally either. I could definitely see your point of even higher ABV beers getting people in trouble. That being said, the tastes are typically so strong (to the point of being disgusting in a lot of cases) that your typical Bud drinker won't drink more than that first taste anyway.

      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
  4. Hooch by BrokenHalo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Beer at 50% ABV is called whisky.

    1. Re:Hooch by kramerd · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, Sam Adams Utopia (27% alcohol by volume) in 2009 was made by aging liquids in whiskey barrels for 16 years, so you aren't all that far off.

    2. Re:Hooch by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that Utopias is an actual beer and is not distilled like the "beers" discussed in the article. It is also only stored in whiskey barrels for less than a year. However, I've also heard that it tastes awful. One of the things that normally classifies a drink as a beer is that it is a result of fermentation without distilling of the end product, just like wine. Once you distill a beer, IMHO, you get liquor.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    3. Re:Hooch by EricWright · · Score: 1

      This site says that it takes about 18 months, but that they blend in other beers dating back to 1994 ...

      How long do you ferment?
      It’s 18 months, but we blend in barrel stock going back to Triple Bock, so 1994....It’s a blend of really old and about 18 months.

      So, I guess in a way, some small percentage of Utopias is 16 years old and counting, but the bulk of it is only 1.5 years old at bottling.

    4. Re:Hooch by Thomasje · · Score: 0
      Right. And if you freeze-distill wine for long enough, it'll be brandy, right? Bullshit.

      It makes a huge difference whether you remove water by freezing or by distilling. The heat used in distillation causes chemical changes that do not happen when freezing; also, in distillation, much more than just water is left behind in the heated vessel, only the substances that can travel with the alcohol fumes end up in the distillate. This is why beer , even the really strong stuff, tastes nothing like whisky, and why even fortified wine tastes nothing like brandy.

      But hey, if you want to call everything that was made from barley or wheat and has a high alcohol content "whisky", feel free to try and rewrite the dictionary -- while the rest of us continue to use words like "strong beer", "vodka", "aquavit", "jenever", and whatnot. Cheers!

    5. Re:Hooch by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      Why not just find a really good beer and drink it, with shots of everclear in between sips? That way before you actually finish your beer, you'll be passed out.

    6. Re:Hooch by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Right. And if you freeze-distill wine for long enough, it'll be brandy, right? Bullshit.

      Oh dear. Slashdot for the humour-impaired. OK, I was being facetious - but I thought that was obvious.

    7. Re:Hooch by jholder · · Score: 1

      Utopias is, at 24%, about the highest you can get with yeast fermentation - they use a very specially bred super-strain of yeast with very high alcohol tolerance... most yeast quit somewhere between 9 and 15%, up to about 17% for some champagne yeasts. Utopias is surprisingly good (I tasted it at the Great American Beer Festival) - a port-like beer, if you will. I do not think it is worth the asking price of $100 a bottle, though. I completely agree that any form of distillation causes beer to stop being beer, as well.

      --
      -- John
    8. Re:Hooch by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      They have actually gotten it over 26% with recent batches. I probably shouldn't have mentioned that I had heard it tastes awful, as I was only recalling something I read in some comment somewhere. Personal preference and all that.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    9. Re:Hooch by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      If you're expecting a beer taste, then yeah, it'll taste awful. Utopias tastes more like brandy than beer. However, if you like brandy, you will probably like Utopias.

      I had a small snifter of Utopias about two months ago for the first time and really liked it.

      And yeah, I agree - it seems that most of those who have managed to beat Utopias have been cheating by doing the "ice beer" thing. Utopias may still be the strongest naturally fermented beer that hasn't had post-fermentation concentration techniques applied.

      Interesting side note - Freezing pre-fermentation is how ice wine is made. In most European countries, you may only legally call it ice wine if it was naturally frozen in certain conditions, and as a result it is very expensive. In the United States, you're allowed to stick the grapes in the freezer.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    10. Re:Hooch by heson · · Score: 1

      Utopias is quite tasty, but nothing I would drink more than 2cl of (1cl is probably a good serving)

    11. Re:Hooch by budgenator · · Score: 1

      My sensibilities bristle at calling this technique Freeze Distillation
      First distillation requires a still, which Fractional freezing does not,
      Second in distillation the desired product is generally the distillate, not the residuum,
      Third the proper term for what they are doing in the beverage context is jacking, as in Applejack.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    12. Re:Hooch by Thomasje · · Score: 1
      Protip: when someone doesn't get that you were joking, it doesn't necessarily mean that they're "humour-impaired". Maybe, just maybe, it means that it actually wasn't obvious that you were joking.

      Besides, the difference between strong beer and whisky is no joking matter.

    13. Re:Hooch by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You should really try to only cite references that don't contradict your position. From Applejack:

      Applejack is a strong alcoholic beverage produced from apples, popular in the American colonial period and thought to originate from the French apple brandy Calvados. Applejack is made by concentrating hard cider, either by the traditional method of freeze distillation or by true evaporative distillation. The term applejack derives from jacking, a term for freeze distillation.

      Next time, try reading a page before linking it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Hooch by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      He knows that people call it freeze distillation. He doesn’t think it should be called that.

      Freeze “distillation” is just about as much distillation as making tomato paste is. You’re removing water. What remains is more concentrated.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  5. Oh man by Pojut · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This will make our Counterstrike drinking game MUCH more interesting.

  6. Is this really beer by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is this really beer?
    I find it hard to believe that this could be brewed naturally, i.e. using yeast to ferment the liquor. I find it hard to believe that a yeast can live in 50% alcohol, 27% was really pushing the limits.

    1. Re:Is this really beer by Ogive17 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If it's freeze distilled, I don't see why they can't do it. All they are doing is brewing a normal beer, then removing some of the water.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    2. Re:Is this really beer by Verdatum · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you freeze distill it, then it stops being beer in my book. If you freeze distill hard cider, it's not "extreme cider", it's friggin' applejack.

    3. Re:Is this really beer by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Except for the addition of hops and the lack of aging in a suitable barrel, this high alcohol content beer is ... wait for it ... whiskey.

      Maximum alcohol content via fermentation alone is on the order of 10-15%, after which the yeast tend to die. Higher concentrations are achieved by distillation.

    4. Re:Is this really beer by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Ummmm .... in the second sentence of the summary it says 'freeze distilled'. It's not like you actually had to go and read an article or anything.

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:Is this really beer by captainpanic · · Score: 0

      It's safe to call it beer. Real beer. Although it would also be safe to create a special category for beers like these.

      Yeast will die (or at least stop fermenting) at more than 20% ethanol. These guys freeze the beer. The ice that forms is rich in water, and most ethanol remains in the liquid (beer). Scoop out the ice. Repeat a couple of times, and you have all the ingredients of your beer still present, with less water.

    6. Re:Is this really beer by archmcd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wrong. This is not beer, this is a distilled beverage. This technique isn't new, and the method of distillation is the only thing that makes this product distinct from traditional whiskey.

      --
      I'm not an expert, but I play one on slashdot.
    7. Re:Is this really beer by dargaud · · Score: 2, Informative

      So that's the 2nd most ancient method to produce alcohol in the world... The first one being: take some juice, let it ferment, drink (applies to wine, beer, honey-wine, etc). The next step is to take that fermented juice on a cold winter night, let some of it freeze (the water part), throw the ice away and repeat until the alcohol concentration is high enough for your taste. Word of warning: it usually produces a bad taste as a lot of stuff (aldehydes, amides, etc) that are better off either evaporated or left at the bottom of the tank will stay in the brew.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    8. Re:Is this really beer by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's whisky. Just because it's distilled by freezing instead of heating the principle is the same hence the term 'distilling'. Temperature differences are being used to remove water.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    9. Re:Is this really beer by afidel · · Score: 1

      Nope, Utopias achieves it's high content via fermentation alone, it combines extremely high initial gravity with a particularly strong strain of yeast.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    10. Re:Is this really beer by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      What the hell is wrong with regular beer?

      I mean, do people only drink to get drunk?

      I enjoy a good beer as much as the next guy, but damn, man, I don't want to pick myself up off the floor after a couple, you know?

      Much easier ways to get hammered than trying to make beer "hard".

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    11. Re:Is this really beer by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Yes, The guys at Samuel Adams have done something special there... I believe they also age their premium stuff in barrels, not unlike whiskey. It's atypical though.

    12. Re:Is this really beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. With honest-to-goodness beers approaching or breaking the 20% "barrier" (I have a couple bottled of Dogfish Head World Wide Stout at 19% ABV cellaring at the moment), there's certainly no reason to classify distilled spirits as beer simply because they started out as beer.

    13. Re:Is this really beer by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Don't they freeze distill "ice" beers (like Ice House), just not to the extent of reaching 50% alcohol. I just assumed "cold filtering" was basically the same process which seems to be common.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    14. Re:Is this really beer by pz · · Score: 1

      Is this really beer?

      I find it hard to believe that this could be brewed naturally, i.e. using yeast to ferment the liquor. I find it hard to believe that a yeast can live in 50% alcohol, 27% was really pushing the limits.

      How is this marked insightful when it is nothing but ignorant? The poster could not possibly have read the article because if they had, they would realize that it isn't beer straight out of the fermenter, but rather beer processed to extract and therefore concentrate the alcohol and most everything else. The interesting part is that freezing the beer to extract water is hard: you need to chill the beer to just the right temperature for just the right amount of time so that the ice crystals are just the right size so that they can be filtered out mechanically. The process is one of decreasing efficiency where the higher alcohol beers requiring over a dozen freeze/filtration/thaw cycles. I wonder why they don't use an immersion freezer instead and allow the crystals to grow arbitrarily large.

      My brother (with a two-digit Slashdot ID) is a big fan of the Utiopias. Says it's the best beer ever. There's a barley wine that's made by a bewer locally here that's called Benevolance that I find amazing. It's a good time to like beer.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    15. Re:Is this really beer by hweimer · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you freeze distill it, then it stops being beer in my book.

      Same here, but unfortunately the EU has forced us here in Germany to lower our standards so that people may call it "beer" even if it hasn't been made according to the Reinheitsgebot. In fact, such beverages have been around for quite some time under the name Bierschnaps.

      Oh, and if you're interest in fancy drinks, you should try to get a Kehlenschneider. 80% ABV and 400,000 Scoville units. Which means you won't even notice the alcohol in it.

      --
      OS Reviews: Free and Open Source Software
    16. Re:Is this really beer by corbettw · · Score: 1

      That's called "whiskey".

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    17. Re:Is this really beer by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      Sometimes people dont drink for quantity, they drink for quality.

      As a brewer, there are certain flavors you can bring out by freeze distilling. I personally am not a fan of barley wines and higher ABV beers, but there are many people who love the flavor. Once you get into the brew world you start seeing some really obsessive behavior in the types of beer brewed and products used. Personally, I try to lower my ABV and keep the taste, which is really difficult...

      However, in this case it is more of a "can it be done" kind of thing. I don't imagine it will be all that tasty, much like the black pepper beers don't make a good beer but make a fantastic marinade...

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    18. Re:Is this really beer by captainpanic · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's whisky. Just because it's distilled by freezing instead of heating the principle is the same hence the term 'distilling'. Temperature differences are being used to remove water.

      Distillation is a separation by difference in volatility (or vapor pressure). The more volatile component will be present in the vapor phase in a higher concentration than the other stuff when you boil the liquid.

      The process here is called crystallization, and has very little to do with distillation, except that it also is used in a separation. Also, there is no temperature difference - it's just cold. The temperature of the entire barrel of beer-like-booze will gradually drop, but there is no temperature difference like in a distillation process where the temperature of the boiling liquid differs from the condensing vapors.
      While you scoop out more ice, the temperature drops (as a function of alcohol content in the liquid). So, the liquid will cool down more over time... but there is no requirement to have a temperature difference unless you're afraid that the ice won't melt and go down the sink.

      Whiskey is the condensed gas phase of the beer and you throw away the liquid residue.
      In this process the good stuff never left the liquid phase. You throw away the ice.

      Anyway, we've entered a discussion where we disagree on definitions. I'll give you the point that this may not be beer, but it certainly isn't whiskey either.

      If you disagree with me on the distillation part, you can also change the text on wikipedia (types of distillation, subsection "other types", subsubsection "stuff that isn't really distillation").

      Freeze distillation is an analogous method of purification using freezing instead of evaporation. It is not truly distillation, but a recrystallization where the product is the mother liquor, and does not produce products equivalent to distillation. This process is used in the production of ice beer and ice wine to increase ethanol and sugar content, respectively. It is also used to produce applejack. Unlike distillation, freeze distillation concentrates poisonous congeners rather than removing them.

      ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distillation#Other_types )

    19. Re:Is this really beer by false_cause · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except that evaporative and freeze distilling do not necessarily remove the same non-alcohol components. There is much more in wash/mash/beer than just water and alcohol. I have no personal experience with freeze distilling so I can't say which congeners stick around, but it could, and probably does, produce a much different product.

    20. Re:Is this really beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really true though. Distillation by heating carries the stuff that is around the boiling point of alcohol or lower. Distillation by freezing carries the stuff that is around the freezing point of water or higher. Those are completely different subsets of what's in beer to begin with.

      I suspect freeze-distilled beer still tastes like beer. Whiskey sure as hell does not.

      But yeah, to a very 1st approximation both techniques "remove water".

    21. Re:Is this really beer by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      Whiskey doesn't have hops in it. And in the case of Scotch is pete smoked, and aged in barrels. Freeze distillation has been around in beers for a while. You ever try Natty Ice? Normal ice beers aren't distilled to hit anything above 7%.

      --
      Balderdash!
    22. Re:Is this really beer by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Actually, from my experiments with a 600,000 SCO sauce any chili takes a second or two to start burning while strong spirits start instantly. So I figure you will taste the alcohol, and it might be the last thing you taste for a while...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    23. Re:Is this really beer by happyemoticon · · Score: 1

      I'm inclined to agree with you, but at the same time, freeze-distilled beer isn't quite whiskey. Distilled spirits have a pleasant purity of taste because a lot of the larger molecules that give beer its characteristics don't distill. I like the guy above's term "Bierschnaps."

      At the same time, I think the category of "beer" should include more than just Reinheitsgebot beers, at least internationally. That leaves out all sorts of interesting, traditional brews such as oatmeal stouts, Hefeweizen, and many belgian ales. In my opinion it's more adulteration of the time-honored malt-mash-sparge-boil-ferment process that makes it invalid than the addition of large amounts of adjuncts. I certainly wouldn't call a nice hefeweizen or an oatmeal stout a "malt beverage" or some such.

    24. Re:Is this really beer by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

      champagne yeast, actually. which also raises questions as to its 'beerness'.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    25. Re:Is this really beer by Elky+Elk · · Score: 4, Funny

      I didn't think Germans were still allowed to enforce 'purity laws'.

    26. Re:Is this really beer by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Well, you're half right. I was moving fast and lazy when I tossed out 'temperature', but what I meant of course was the different boiling points of materials (volatility, as you said). Crystallization is just a reverse of the principle. Just as materials differ in volatility and how they boil at different temperatures and pressures, materials of course differ in how they crystallize at different temperatures and pressures. (In fact where ever I say 'temperature' but not 'pressure', assume I mean temperature/pressure, because really temperature by itself is well nigh meaningless.)

      Again you're right about whiskey, it is a product of the condensate, but that's not fundamentally different. If this 'beer' is whatever is liquid after removing whatever else is solid at a given temperature, how is that special vs. whiskey being whatever was (at one point) vapor while whatever else was still liquid at a given temperature?

      It really is a matter of definition as you say, and as far as I'm concerned if you have to dance 'beer' around in terms of temperature to remove significant portions of its solution, it's nae beer anymore. Further, I think that we're dealing with a difference in definitions of distillation. I think that where it applies to alcoholic beverage preparation, distillation becomes any means by which alcohol is concentrated by removal or decrease of constituent elements. Hence why 'freeze distillation' is so coined when it has none of the elements of true distillation.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    27. Re:Is this really beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is wrong with regular beer?

      I mean, do people only drink to get drunk?

      Welcome to the age of the speedrun mindset. The endgame is being drunk. Therefore, obviously, the point is to get there as fast as possible, using any glitch or cheat in the system you can.

      Wasting a half-second getting drunk is shameful. A full second, inexcusable.

    28. Re:Is this really beer by XSpud · · Score: 1

      I find it hard to believe that this could be brewed naturally, i.e. using yeast to ferment the liquor. I find it hard to believe that a yeast can live in 50% alcohol, 27% was really pushing the limits.

      I'd also find it hard to swallow a 50% A.B.V beer.

    29. Re:Is this really beer by digitig · · Score: 1

      What the hell is wrong with regular wine, that they have to turn it into brandy?

      Nothing wrong with distilling something to see if it makes a nice drink.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    30. Re:Is this really beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome, so you get to waste a lot more energy (because cooling consumes more) and end up with a more poisonous substance. Is all that to just claim "it's still beer" or is there an actual point to it beyond that?

    31. Re:Is this really beer by jte · · Score: 1

      Take it from a applejacker (and brewer) in the Northeast - with freeze distillation, those distinctive heavier alcohols definitely do come through because they are not vaporized - and can make your final product taste pretty nasty.

    32. Re:Is this really beer by afidel · · Score: 1

      Considering how many different varieties of commercial yeast are used in brewing (not to mention wild strains found in some Belgians and some other styles) I don't think you can disqualify it as a beer based on the strain of yeast. Besides, they didn't just take an off the shelf champagne yeast, they started with a champagne yeast and bred their own variety that was even more alcohol tolerant =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    33. Re:Is this really beer by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't. Whiskey is made by distillation. Basically, BOILING the alcohol out of a barley-malt beer (no hops!), and then condensing and collecting the alcohol steam and whatever other elements were light enough to boil off with it.

      The boiling process chemically alters the drink. Not only does it leave behind much of the non-alcohol AND non-water elements, but those elements that manage to boil off with the alcohol are different than they were before the boiling process started.

      Simply put, adding heat changes the chemical composition of a liquid far more than removing heat does. Whiskey is made by adding heat. These beers are made by removing it.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    34. Re:Is this really beer by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      I didn't think Germans were still allowed to enforce 'purity laws'.

      Oh, dude...

      That's just mean.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    35. Re:Is this really beer by cjHopman · · Score: 2, Informative

      unfortunately the EU has forced us here in Germany to lower our standards so that people may call it "beer" even if it hasn't been made according to the Reinheitsgebot

      And thank god for that... the Reinheitsgebot is one of the worst laws in existence. It was originally written to stop competition in grain prices between brewers and bakers. Yep, that's right, brewers were limited to certain ingredients to keep the price of bread down. This law was then spread to other countries so that brewers who had to follow the law could actually compete in the marketplace. I'm sorry, but that is not the process for making a good law.

      Today, the law is merely a marketing sham. That is, marketing departments like to claim that following the law somehow makes the beer better and that their company follows the law; the first is false, and the second usually is.

    36. Re:Is this really beer by lewiscr · · Score: 1

      To give some examples, distillation leaves the flavor compounds behind and produces a colorless, flavorless alcohol. This is usually aged in oak and charcoal filtered for flavor. If done properly, it the "bad" alcohols are discarded during the process. (Backwood's stills are notorious for not doing this last step properly, hence the reputation for making you blind or dead.)

      Freeze distillation concentrates the original liquid (with alcohol). The original flavors are kept (and concentrated), along with the "good" and "bad" alcohols.

    37. Re:Is this really beer by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Wrong, Eisbock is beer and has been made this way for a long time.

    38. Re:Is this really beer by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Eisbock is fine. Also wheat beers do not meet Reinheitsgebot, but are still awesome beers.

    39. Re:Is this really beer by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Eisbock has been produced for a long time and is real beer.

    40. Re:Is this really beer by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      the method of distillation is the only thing that makes this product distinct from traditional whiskey

      Wrong.

      Traditional whiskey is the lightest, most volatile compounds that are heat-distilled out. All of the heavier compounds, including water, are left.

      This high-alcohol beer is all of the ingredients that were present in the beer, but with some of the water removed. It has all the heavy compounds left in that normal heat-distillation would have left out.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    41. Re:Is this really beer by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      It’s a matter of what you’re removing, and what’s left.

      Heat distillation: Remove light compounds, including ethanol, leaving the heavy compounds behind, including water. Collect the lighter compounds that you removed and drink them.

      Ice distillation: Remove only water, leaving everything else. Drink what’s left. You get lots of heavy compounds left in the mix that wouldn’t be found in a heat-distilled product.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    42. Re:Is this really beer by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Distillation by freezing carries the stuff that is around the freezing point of water or higher.

      Not only that: Water is relatively unique. When frozen, it floats. Anything else that happened to solidify at that temperature would sink.

      You really are removing only the water.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    43. Re:Is this really beer by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      >>Kehlenschneider. 80% ABV and 400,000 Scoville units...

      So is their tagline:

      "Mmm...you can feel the stomach cancer developing!"

    44. Re:Is this really beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good lord! Liquid habanero suspended in alcohol. I... who the hell could drink that stuff?

    45. Re:Is this really beer by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      yeah, but Eisbock sounds WAY cooler than "extreme beer", and doesn't itself have the word "beer" in it.

    46. Re:Is this really beer by ggeens · · Score: 1

      Is this really beer?

      There's only one picture of what it looks like in a glass. No foam. So it's not beer.

      --
      WWTTD?
    47. Re:Is this really beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry guy, but here in Germany we have been freeze-distilling beer continuously since about 1890, exactly because this does NOT violate on the Reinheitsgebot!

  7. More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I like beer. I like drinking beer. I like drinking a variety of beers. I don't like being falling down drunk. This race for higher alcohol content seems pointless and just limits the amount you can enjoy in one sitting.

    1. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by HopefulIntern · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agreed. I was saddened when I came back to my home country of Norway a few years ago to discover no shops sells so-called "light beers" anymore. (For you Americans, a light beer in Europe means lower alcohol, about 1-2%, not fewer calories). I always enjoyed these beers because I could pound one when I came home from work and it would be delicious without giving me any impairment. (Before anyone mentions alcohol free beer, I have tried many and never liked them.)

      This seems strange to me, making beer so strong. What are they trying to achieve with this? A 50% beer means you can only have a few measures of it before you will get sick. Where is the enjoyment? A pint of cold, crisp draught surely beats a shot of this stuff?

    2. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by ciaohound · · Score: 1

      I spent a year in Europe 23 years ago, and I always liked EKU 28, which was billed as the "strongest beer in the world." Kind of sweet, malty, with hints of cherry (not cherry-flavored, of course.) It's not widely available in the states, but now one can find Belgian triples and doppelbocks and other stronger brews, and I really like those too. The goal to reach 50 percent alcohol seems kind of artificial, like a running race that is 26.2 miles long. I guess the point is to push the limits, and maybe beyond what is reasonable. But if it tastes good, or if you learn something in the process, I say go for it.

      --
      Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    3. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I always enjoyed these beers because I could pound one when I came home from work and it would be delicious without giving me any impairment.

      You get impaired on a regular beer? What kind of light weight are you? ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      There's a reason for 26.2 miles....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by gsslay · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly. The quality and enjoyability of the beer is not determined by the percentage of alcohol. If this kind of mindless "mines bigger than yours" appeals to you then why not buy a bottle of 100% distilled medical alcohol and pour it straight down your throat?

      Woohoo! It's a hundred percent! You can't get bigger! You win! Now bring over the stomach pumps.

      The same macho BS that goes on about curry strengths. People competitively eat the strongest curry they can get hold off, to the point of it knocking your taste buds into a coma. Well done. Now you can't taste anything and you're oozing curry paste from every duct and pore you possess. You win.

    6. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by stupid_is · · Score: 1

      And Pheidippides is not the reason. He is merely the reason for a long race that is 25m long. This is the reason for 26.22 miles, although it didn't stick until 1924

      --
      -- Intelligence is soluble in alcohol
    7. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Have you tried Kaliber by Guinness? It is a NA that is actually like a real beer...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    8. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      You don't know Norwegian drink-driving laws..

    9. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1

      I hate beer. I hate drinking beer. I hate the taste of beer. The only reason I drink is socially and that is to loosen me up so I'm not a wallflower. I'd *prefer* to just drink shots of Tequila because it does a better job, quicker, without making me feel bloated like beer does, but for some reason at neighborhood gatherings nobody really breaks out the "hard" alcohol, the just sit around like pansies drinking Bud Lite and Miller Lite... horse piss IMHO.

    10. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Before I quit drinking I could drink 1 liter of 40% alcohol Vodka or Whiskey without passing out. Sometimes I could drink almost 2 liters but that would always result in a blackout. Even after drinking 1 liter I was still able to walk around and do stuff without stumbling, and obviously I can remember being that drunk. The most notable difference is that I probably slurred my speech after .75 liters. I presume this high alcohol beer is for people with that level of tolerance. 1 pint will get people like that a buzz, thats all.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    11. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by boneclinkz · · Score: 0

      I like beer. I like drinking beer. I like drinking a variety of beers. I don't like being falling down drunk. This race for higher alcohol content seems pointless and just limits the amount you can enjoy in one sitting.

      Screw that. I like to get totally fucking trashed by one extreme beer at the local watering hole, then hop on my skateboard and rail grind the whole way home.

    12. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by xs650 · · Score: 1

      "but for some reason at neighborhood gatherings nobody really breaks out the "hard" alcohol, the just sit around like pansies drinking Bud Lite and Miller Lite... horse piss IMHO."

      I've never tasted horse piss, so I'll have to take your word for it.

    13. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by Motard · · Score: 1

      Unless you could concentrate both the alcohol and flavors into a concentrate that you could add carbonated water to to reconstitute. Beer could then be transported far more inexpensively.

    14. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Compare this silly race to the apparent contest of "whose beer can be the hoppiest?". Just because you can doesn't mean you should. Traditional IPAs are hoppy enough, but then you get Bell's Two-Hearted Ale (which I do like), then Hopalicious (New Glarus, I think) and others. They get kind of crazy.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    15. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by captainpanic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This seems strange to me, making beer so strong. What are they trying to achieve with this? A 50% beer means you can only have a few measures of it before you will get sick. Where is the enjoyment? A pint of cold, crisp draught surely beats a shot of this stuff?

      It's the same reason some people wait half a day, then strap themselves into a jet powered bomb on wheels to do a quarter mile really really fast.
      It's not the most practical or the most comfortable way of traveling... but I guess it's just really really cool.

      I can completely understand why they make this beer.

      However, I would not understand why someone would drink more than a shot glass of it though. I fully agree that there are few (perhaps none at all) drinks that are better than a simple cold normal beer. And the best part of a simple cold normal beer is that you can have more than one. Yay.

    16. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by hodet · · Score: 1

      As a beer lover myself I agree wholeheartedly with this. But seems like a whole new category of hard liquor to me. I am not much into hard liquor but would be interested in trying a shot of beer. I don't think the idea is to pound these back on a hot summer day.

    17. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you're being an artsy fartsy idiot if you're using alcoholic beverages for "enjoyment". It's the dumbest fucking thing ever. Alcohol has one purpose, and enjoyment is not it. People delude themselves into thinking that they like the taste.

      If everyone just agreed to tell the truth, people wouldn't have to be indoctrinated into thinking that alcohol "tastes good". They'll just admit on the real reason they like it. Getting drunk.

      kthnxbye

    18. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by adeft · · Score: 1

      I drink beer so much I should have stock in it. I like higher ABV because it lasts me longer. The right beer for the right purpose....for example: if I'm drinking all day Dead Guy Ale or Guinnes might work. If its 8 PM and I'm going to bed in a few hours: it should probably be a barley-wine. Also, higher ABV typically means I drink less of them which means I intake less calories.

    19. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait... you're Norwegian and you drink light beer?!? Time to turn in your Norwegian ID card!

      (I agree, if you're drinking 50% alcohol beer, you can no longer claim you're doing it "for the taste!"

    20. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Pro tips from an ex-wallflower!

      Pro Tip #1: Find a decent beer you *like* and bring a six pack to said social gatherings. Reserve 2 for yourself, share the rest.
      Pro Tip #2: Replace "decent beer" above with "moderate quality sipping alcohol." Pour a round for bonus points. This is tougher, as most hard liquors taste horrible unless you spend a ton.
      Pro Tip #3: Pre-game! Nothing wrong with downing a shot before heading over (assuming walking around the neighborhood) or packing a flask.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    21. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      And the best part of a simple cold normal beer is that you can have more than one. Unlike women.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    22. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by lewiscr · · Score: 1

      Just to be pedantic, less alcohol is fewer calories. I'm happy to give up alcohol and calories, as long as I don't have to give up flavor.

      American Homebrewers have Session Beer, which is just that. Less sugar to ferment, but still has a decent flavor when it's done. You can tell the difference between the regular and the session version, but if they both taste good, then I'm happy.

      I've tried "alcohol free" beer, most of which are about 0.5% ABV (in the US). Most of them taste like unfermented beer to me. It should be possible to brew a lightly hopped beer, remove most of the alcohol with vacuum distillation, then dry hop the beer to give it back the hop aroma lost with the alcohol. As a bonus, the same place could sell a premium "vacuum distilled" vodka. One of these days, I might try it at home.

    23. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      See, even a 0.5% beer would put you over the limit in Norway, so the only alternative to full-strength beer is alcohol-free (as in 0.000%). As mentioned, it tastes awful, probably for the reasons you describe.

    24. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by Silfax · · Score: 1

      I don't think the idea is to pound these back on a hot summer day.

      not something to pound back on a hot summer day after doing yard work, but surely nice to sip on a cold winter afternoon after shoveling snow....

    25. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Iowa the 10% ethanol in our gasoline is made in corn based ethanol plants. I've heard of one worker (probably alcoholic, not the brightest) who saw a spill on the floor, walked over, scooped some into a cup, and then drank it. I'm not sure you get any stronger than that. Bring on the stomach pumps, indeed.

    26. Re:More Alcohol and Less Drinking? by hodet · · Score: 1

      yup my thoughts exactly. cheers :-)

  8. Legal warning by richi · · Score: 1

    Legal warning: IANAL, but I understand that freeze distillation is illegal in some jurisdictions.

    1. Re:Legal warning by skydyr · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about illegal, but certainly not good for you. It tends to concentrate chemicals in the alcohol that would be tossed in the heads and tails of a normal distillation, which tend to give worse hangovers and may have other undesirable effects.

    2. Re:Legal warning by afidel · · Score: 1

      Home distilling isn't legal in most of the US (stupid blue laws and revenuers), but I don't think any state board (except maybe PA and UT) have time to enforce such idiocy against a homebrewer and the ATF has responded to several inquiry's stating that they don't have time now that they are part of DHS and have actual bad guys to worry about.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Legal warning by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Distilling spirits is illegal. Distilling alternative fuels is legal.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  9. Nope. by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

    Real beer is not in the "Distilled class". To high percentages of alcohol would kill the fermentation organisms. That is why alcoholic substances are distilled after the fermentation to obtain higher alcohol percentages.

    Like beer, fermented grain is the basis for Whiskey. So, as others pointed out, "distilled beer" is not a wrong term for Whiskey.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:Nope. by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1

      Real beer is not in the "Distilled class". To high percentages of alcohol would kill the fermentation organisms. That is why alcoholic substances are distilled after the fermentation to obtain higher alcohol percentages.

      Like beer, fermented grain is the basis for Whiskey. So, as others pointed out, "distilled beer" is not a wrong term for Whiskey.

      OK, to be really picky... fermented grain is the basis for ale. Beer is ale flavoured with hops. Whisky is not flavoured with hops, and is therefore distilled ale, not distilled beer. So we still don't have a name for distilled beer, unless you call it 'hop flavoured whisky'.

      Redants'R'Us

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    2. Re:Nope. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Even all that being said, there’s a huge difference between heat distillation and ice distillation. The heat chemically changes some of the compounds, the lighter compounds evaporate, and those are collected and that’s your whiskey. Vs. ice distillation, where only the water is removed, leaving a stronger brew of everything else. You don’t get the same chemical changes that heat would produce, and you get the heavier compounds left in the brew that would never distill out with the whiskey.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    3. Re:Nope. by Silfax · · Score: 1

      OK, to be really picky... fermented grain is the basis for ale. Beer is ale flavoured with hops. Whisky is not flavoured with hops, and is therefore distilled ale, not distilled beer. So we still don't have a name for distilled beer, unless you call it 'hop flavoured whisky'.

      I will be a bit pickier -- fermented grain is the basis for beer

      ale is beer fermented with a top fermenting yeast, while lager beers are fermented with a yeast that tends to settle to the bottom of the fermenting vessel.
      at one time the ale/beer difference was if hops or a gruit mixture was used for flavoring, but over time the usage of the terms has changed a bit.

  10. How can there be a 'race to 50%'? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    It's distilled ... you can make it as strong as you like, no magic needed.

    --
    No sig today...
  11. Methanol by SIGBUS · · Score: 1

    One problem with freeze distillation is that it doesn't get rid of methanol. How are they getting around this problem?

    --
    Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
    1. Re:Methanol by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Funny

      One problem with freeze distillation is that it doesn't get rid of methanol. How are they getting around this problem?

      Putting "Not for human consumption" on the bottles?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:Methanol by jbeaupre · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You mean the same methanol that was in the normal beer to begin with?

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    3. Re:Methanol by hcpxvi · · Score: 1

      One reason for actual home distilling being illegal is the fire risk. At least freeze distillation doesn't do that. I imagine that a double-strength hangover is bad, but less bad than a large air/vapour explosion. Mind you, without having tried it, I expect that the results of freeze distilling would taste neither pleasant, nor like beer.

    4. Re:Methanol by Ross+D+Anderson · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean the same methanol that was in the normal beer to begin with?

      But in far lower concentrations. i.e. 1 pint of normal beer would contain far less methanol than 1 pint of distilled beer.

    5. Re:Methanol by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      Yes, but is now in a higher concentration, as you've taken a lot of the water out.

    6. Re:Methanol by dwye · · Score: 1

      > One reason for actual home distilling being illegal is the fire risk.

      And the possibility of making commercial quantities that evade the taxing authorities has NOTHING to do with it. Everyone knows that the military response to the Whiskey Rebellion, in Washington's term as POTUS, was to vigorously enforce fire safety regulations.

    7. Re:Methanol by P-Nuts · · Score: 1

      Does it matter? If you start off with beer which wouldn't make you go blind, then remove some of the water, there isn't going to be more methanol in it than you started off with.

    8. Re:Methanol by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      They are supposedly starting with ordinary, fit-to-drink beer. Therefore there wasn't any methanol to begin with, and thus they don't have to worry about getting rid of it.

    9. Re:Methanol by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Concentration of methanol has nothing to do with it. It's quantity.

      1 pint of distilled beer is exactly the same as 10 pints of normal beer except for removing 90% of the water. Drinking either will get you just as drunk, just as hung over, etc. Ok, some difference due to hydration levels, but methanol is the least of your concerns.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    10. Re:Methanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct, but remember that one pint of distilled beer is 10 servings, not one.

    11. Re:Methanol by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      Wrong, concentration matters a great deal. Your stomach doesn't instantly absorb its contents into your blood. It works away at it slowly. If alcohol is concentrated 10x, then its going to be absorbed a lot faster. Maybe not 10x faster, but still, faster. You can see the same principle in beer-free beers. They contain around 0.5% alcohol, the same 10x dilution as with the distilled vs. regular beer. But, drinking 10 won't get you as drunk as 1 regular beer. Because it takes time to drink it, and you'll have 10x as much stuff going through your digestive system, slowing the rate of absorption down. Beyond that, your alcohol metabolism is more or less a fixed rate for removing ethanol and methanol from your blood. Odds are pretty good that on nonalcoholic beer, your stomach won't keep up with your metabolism, and your blood alcohol level will never be more than a tiny amount, if it reads as non-zero at all. So, while it won't be worse by orders of magnitude, it will be worse. In something that's freeze distilled to 10x concentration, you will absorb the same amount methanol a whole lot faster, and your metabolism will not keep up with breaking it down. Beyond which, you can fit a lot more in your stomach.

      On the other hand, beer doesn't really contain any methanol worth speaking of, since that's mostly made from the fermentation of pectin, not found in grains. On the other hand, apples do contain pectin, and apple cider/brandy contains methanol. So, applejack was probably unsafe to drink regularly and in large amounts, because concentration does matter! But, no worries, modern applejack usually isn't distilled cider, it's fortified cider. They take 5-10% cider, and just top it up with pure grain ethanol until it hits 40%.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    12. Re:Methanol by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. Your description of pharmokinetics isn't half bad. I still stand by the statement that quantity matters, not concentration. i.e. 1 ml of 100% vs 100 ml of 10%. Getting worked up the way some people are about concentration, not dumping heads and tails, etc etc misses the main point that if you drink beer concentrate, it's pretty much the same as drinking beer (and exactly the same if you drank some water with it).

      To tell the truth, I've wondered about the methanol level in some of the strong beers. The type of yeast and other chemistry affects yield of ethanol and methanol. It's been optimized for centuries to minimize bad beer. That probably includes minimizing methanol to avoid hangovers. So I've been curious how messing with tradition might produce more unwanted organic compounds.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    13. Re:Methanol by jonwil · · Score: 1

      What that doesn't explain is why home-brewing of beer is legal yet home-brewing of spirits is not even though you could produce commercial quantities of both just as easily.

      I suspect the significantly higher excise taxes attached to distilled alcohol have something to do with it as well as the fact that most home-distillers wouldn't be doing any of the post-distillation steps commercial shops use (such as barrel aging or mixing with water) and may end up with a significantly higher proof than most of whats on the shelf at the local bottle shop.

    14. Re:Methanol by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      What that doesn't explain is why home-brewing of beer is legal yet home-brewing of spirits is not even though you could produce commercial quantities of both just as easily.

      Not entirely true; distilling is much more complex than simply brewing beer... and thus while it could be virtually impossible to crack down on every guy brewing beer in his basement, finding the illegal stills and shutting them down is more manageable of a job.

      Not that they wouldn’t want to shut down the untaxable beer brewers... but what’s the point of even trying?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  12. Freeze Distillation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what I understand freeze distillation can be dangerous. Unlike evaporative distillation, freeze distillation concentrates a lot of unwanted impurities along with the ethyl alcohol.

    1. Re:Freeze Distillation by afidel · · Score: 1

      How can it be any more dangerous than drinking the undistilled beer? The ratio of contaminants to alcohol will remain the same.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Freeze Distillation by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      You can only drink so much undistilled beer before evacuating (whether via urine, sweat, etc). Your body has a lot more time to deal with the lower volumes of poison ingested.
      Similar quantities of the distilled liquid, containing higher concentration of poison by volume, become much more toxic.

    3. Re:Freeze Distillation by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      You can only drink so much undistilled beer before evacuating

      OTOH, given the typical price of these esoteric products, you can only drink so much "distilled beer" before your wallet is evacuated. That will tend to limit your ability to over-consume any toxins.

  13. As a brewer by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a brewer, distillation offends my sensibilities if you keep calling it beer.

    --
    +0 Meh
    1. Re:As a brewer by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      As a brewer you are surely aware of ice bock? It's always a question how far you want to take the method. Ice bock is definitely to be classified as beer, albeit having undergone one freezing step. If it is beer under the Bavarian "Reinheitsgebot" - it IS beer!

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    2. Re:As a brewer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is an Eisbock not a beer? There are beers that are traditionally freeze distilled, just not to this degree.

    3. Re:As a brewer by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but I'd counter that Eisbock was accidentally created as a product of the environment it was brewed in. A side effect of brewing where I live is only being able to make ales. I'm fine with that. As you say, it's a matter of the degrees to which you are willing to manipulate the conditions. When it comes to brewing I'm a sort of a traditionalist because I'm so in love with the simplicity of the natural beer making process and the spectacular results it allows. I don't keg, I don't lager, and I merely said distillation was offensive to my sensibilities. I never said it wasn't beer.

      As far as the Reinheitsgebot goes, it's not necessarily a good definition of what a beer is since it doesn't even allow yeast. That's understandable, given the limited understanding of fermentation at the time it was written. Calling it a "purity" law is a complete joke though. The law was created to protect the wheat supplies of bakers, not to ensure the purity of beer or maintain a tradition which has been steeped in the use of adjuncts since the days of Babylon.

      --
      +0 Meh
    4. Re:As a brewer by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1
      Guess we are basically on the same side here - I have no interest in 40% beers either. For me, however, ice bock is completely legitimate and can be used to create some great beers - one of my favourites is the wheat ice bock Aventinus by Schneider, Munich. I guess my "it is still beer" comment was more aimed at the crowd above, somehow you got into the crosshairs there. ;)

      Regarding the Reinheitsgebot - your point about the wheat supply is certainly true. There is, in my opinion, more to that, though. First of all, it was originally a means of price regulation, too. And it might be viewed as an early "drug" law, as the use of psychoactive and more or less toxic components was common back then.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    5. Re:As a brewer by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's a good point about banning dangerous ingredients. I guess calling a purity law does make sense.

      --
      +0 Meh
    6. Re:As a brewer by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      I am Bavarian, consider myself a lover of fine beers AND have been born basically at the birthplace of the Eisbock - you understand why I have to defend my position here ;)

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    7. Re:As a brewer by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A side effect of brewing where I live is only being able to make ales.

      I take it your civilization has not yet invented "Refrigeration", I hear it's a prerequisite before you develop the tech "Lagers". Although, of course, Lagering was originally simply done underground. If you dig five feet you get fifty degree temps...

      The law was created to protect the wheat supplies of bakers, not to ensure the purity of beer or maintain a tradition which has been steeped in the use of adjuncts since the days of Babylon.

      I don't know too much about that law, but certainly the brewing purity laws in England were intended to prevent the use of dangerous adjuncts. I don't recall the last book I read on brewing talking too much about the Reinheitsgebot actually.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:As a brewer by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Freeze distillation isn’t anything remotely similar to heat distillation.

      If you’re drinking something that was heat distilled, you’re drinking the lightweight, volatile compounds that evaporated at a certain temperature. It’s relatively specific with respect to what you’re getting, and that is necessary because the stuff that you’re distilling usually has nasty compounds that aren’t good to drink. However by removing the drinkable compounds from the nasty undrinkable stuff you have a good product.

      If you’re drinking something that was freeze distilled, you’re drinking the concentrated mixture of everything that was left when water, and only water, was removed. If you started with nasty undrinkable stuff, it’s just stronger nasty undrinkable stuff afterward. If you started with regular beer, though, it shouldn’t have any significant amount of the poisonous stuff that you’d normally find in a heat distillation’s input product, and the output is stronger beer.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    9. Re:As a brewer by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      As a brewer you should know that freeze distillation is pretty much the opposite of distillation. The name is just badly chosen. Look it up, and hang your head in shame.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  14. George Thorogood by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    100 proof beer is like someone consolidating one bourbon, one scotch, and one beer into a single drink.

    1. Re:George Thorogood by oodaloop · · Score: 3, Funny

      Everybody funny. Now you funny too.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  15. Anyone tried it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone here actually tried one of these >30% ABV beers? How was it?

    1. Re:Anyone tried it? by mick232 · · Score: 1

      I saw a short report about the two strongest beers in this list on German TV. They gave it to like six people, three women and three men, and none of them seemed to like ...

    2. Re:Anyone tried it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you have it. 6 Germans can't be wrong.

  16. Tastes like a u-boat. by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

    The biggest problem with really strong beer is that it tastes like beer with spirit poured into it.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Tastes like a u-boat. by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I tried Carlsberg Special Brew once. It literally tasted like beer with vodka mixed into it. I threw it out and never tried it again.

  17. Poor baseball by asukasoryu · · Score: 1

    I was already having trouble making it to the 9th inning without passing out.

    --
    There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
  18. US Govt. Restrictions by realsilly · · Score: 1

    I hope the US Govt. doesn't feel the need to ban such a beer from reaching the citizens. Limits on %'s that different alcohols can be sold at is just stupid in my book.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
    1. Re:US Govt. Restrictions by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      US Government: No...
      State Government: Probably...

      I can see the stories about teens getting killed just because they thought they were normal beers.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:US Govt. Restrictions by tilandal · · Score: 1

      Somehow I don't see that many teens buying a $60 beer.

    3. Re:US Govt. Restrictions by dwye · · Score: 1

      There are two problems with your hope. First, most alcohol regulation occurs at the state level. Second, since I have had 151 proof rum for years and have seen vodkas over 190 proof, the problem is not that it is banned, but that it is taxed more as the alcohol level increases (unless denatured, aka poisoned).

    4. Re:US Govt. Restrictions by Qantravon · · Score: 1

      I see those stories circulating without the event ever actually happening. Somebody (like you, possibly), will say "this could happen!" and others will go around repeating it until it becomes "this happened!"

    5. Re:US Govt. Restrictions by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I’m confused... are you saying that could happen? Or that it has happened?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    6. Re:US Govt. Restrictions by Qantravon · · Score: 1

      Well, I know the scenario of people suggesting a possible outcome, and then others misinterpreting that to mean the outcome has actually happened, and then there being a reaction to the fictional outcome, has happened. In fact, it's part of the reason some people are so against D&D. There was a fear that kids could get so attached to a character that, if the character died, the kid would commit suicide. As far as I know, this has never actually happened, but ask someone who is against D&D (particularly for that reason) and they'll likely tell you it DID happen.

      So, what I'm saying is it could (and if it starts spreading enough, probably will) happen. It's basically a grown-up version of telephone. Except with consequences.

  19. Malt Liquor? by dtmos · · Score: 1

    I always thought distilled beer was called malt liquor. No?

  20. Novelty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just a novelty. Nothing wrong with that, but not my thing. Hell, I'd try it. But once you get past about 10% ABV you start to notice the alcohol more than the beer. I prefer ales in the 7-8% range, and after two of those I'll be satisfied. Beers like Sierra Nevada Torpedo, Stone Ruination, the entire line of Dogfish Head, or most anything from Belgium. Lagers or pilsners in the 5-6% range I'll drink three. Veltins is my top choice there.

  21. alcohol with 50% beer content? by lostsoulz · · Score: 1

    Mankind has done a good job at getting sloshed since we crawled out of the primordial soup. Our techniques have produced palatable booze of all types...why would we need beer with such a high alcohol content?

  22. The article is a bit off by Anon-Admin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeast limits the fermentation of sugars to alcohol. Once you get up around 17% to 20% ABV the yeast begin to die off. This is the natural limit of alcohol in beer. To distill the beer and increase the alcohol is to turn it into a distilled liquor and remove it from the realm of beer which is a fermented liquor.

    Through selective breading or genetic manipulation of the yeast we may some day get a yeast that can produce more than the 17% to 20% but that is not the case today.

    I found the article a bit misleading. If you distill it, it is a distilled liquor not a beer. This is like saying you made a beer from grapes, lol, it is not beer it is wine. lol

    1. Re:The article is a bit off by Cheeko · · Score: 1

      Actually the limit is around 27% but just takes special yeast.

      The Sam Adam's Utopias are made this way (no distillation). They simply took the hardiest yeast from repeated generations to get a strain that had extremely high alcohol survivability. This allowed them to reach 27%. That being said, there will always be a limit before the yeast dies off. The only way to push the ABV is distillation, which in my mind, really isn't beer. Beer by definition is a fermented not a distilled drink.

    2. Re:The article is a bit off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Beer yeast will stop fermenting long before 17% To get higher than about 7-8% brewers typically use a wine yeast. That makes it taste more like a barleywine. You can cover some of that up with hops but it is much harder to make it taste right when you stop using beer yeast. At around 13-14% they'd have to switch to a high alcohol content yeast. At this point, there isn't much you can do to make it taste like beer.

    3. Re:The article is a bit off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried selectively breading some yeast. All it gave me was a loaf of bread.

    4. Re:The article is a bit off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Through selective breading or genetic manipulation of the yeast we may some day get a yeast that can produce more than the 17% to 20% but that is not the case today.

      Apparently you don't keep up with the times on your high gravity yeasts.

      WLP099 Super High Gravity Ale Yeast
      Can ferment up to 25% alcohol. From England. Produces ester character that increases with increasing gravity. Malt character dominates at lower gravities.

    5. Re:The article is a bit off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Selective breading", "lol". Is that where you only dip half of the cutlet in the breadcrumbs before you fry it?

      Get OFF MY LAWN and BACK TO SCHOOL WHERE YOU BELONG.

      "lol" indeed. This is slashdot, not AOL Chat.

  23. Eeew. by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 1

    As if it needs to taste any worse. (Would you like a mixer for that beer?)

    This coming, of course, from an already non-beer-fan. :)

    --
    R.Mo
  24. Not new. See alcohol wintering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Relatively new" is a vague description, and so compared to the thousands of years in which we've been drinking alcohol, the hundreds of years that we've been freezing off water to increase the alcohol content is new. But the way it was described makes it sound like something discovered last year! Not so.

  25. Avoidance in the extreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn! So much for that plan. I was going to my first AA meeting today.

  26. i suggest a new category by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    proposed name: idleidle

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  27. Double Bag by dickens · · Score: 1

    I thought Long Trail Double Bag was pretty stiff at 7.2%. I can't see why you would call this beer. That would be like calling brandy "extreme wine" - sure you could do that but why?

    1. Re:Double Bag by nateand · · Score: 1

      Dogfish Head 120 minute IPA is delicious at 18%. Flying Dog Double Dog double IPA is fantastically hoppy at 11.5% if you want something weaker. Stone Brewery's Double Bastard (amazing brewery) is a fantastic American Strong Ale at 10.5%. 120 minute: http://www.dogfish.com/brews-spirits/the-brews/occassional-rarities/120-minute-ipa.htm Double Dog: http://beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/68/35754 Double Bastard: http://beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/147/1056

    2. Re:Double Bag by dickens · · Score: 1

      Yikes!

  28. Fortified Beer? by baKanale · · Score: 1

    Instead of going through all this rigamarole with the freeze distilling and whatnot, wouldn't it be easier just to add more alcohol, like in fortified wines?

    1. Re:Fortified Beer? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Some people don't think that beer with hop extract in it is really beer. So beer with added alcohol is certainly not beer to a whole market of people who will actually spend an absurd amount of money to buy a beer. For instance I have a couple of $11.50 22oz bottles and one $22 bottle aging in my booze cupboard and that's small potaters. Most beers don't age well, you need high alcohol and hop-essence content. That's what IPA is from; India Pale Ales were highly hopped so that they would keep and also still taste like beer when they reached India! I have some Broken Halo made last October which is still very tasty, albeit a very different experience from the original beer. It's still pretty hoppy; I like some things better about it and some things less, although I'd have to drink another one to tell you what specifically and right now we're into Long Hammer which is on sale at Slaveway. Can you tell I'm a hophead :) My favorites are Pliny the Elder (and the Younger, when you can get it) from Russian River, double and triple IPAs respectively. They're hopped at more phases. Also if you're not opposed to hop extract, Hop Stoopid is a lot of fun.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Fortified Beer? by DogFacedJo · · Score: 1

      Off-topic-ish:
        So if you like a decent hop, there are a few from Ontario you might like should the opportunity arise to taste them. In particular, when I was doing some school in Guelph (Sigh - poor Sleeman's, got bought by Molsen, transitively via Upper Canada Breweries..., both destroyed as tasty beer-companies these days) - but the Wellington County brewery, also near Guelph, is still an indy micro. They make a Wellington County Ale, which yer more moderate hop-loving friends might like - and fer you, there's the Wellington Best Bitter. Certain pubs will even serve it at the warmer, British temp, though I like it any way at all: very cold is fine by me.
          Now, these are still classic recipes, so no extracts, but they're still tasty imho.

          As far as stronger stuff, the Unibroue brewery out of Quebec makes a bunch of utterly awesome beers, available at 9% (and 12%, when you can find them). (La Fin de Monde, and Maudite come to mind.) They make decent stuff in the 5-7% range too - a nice Belgian-style, some fruity things and wheats fer the summer.

          Anyway, hope you have a chance to try some of them, and mebbe even like them. Google is yer friend here, and um - I have no idea where you are (except in NA) and thus how irritating it might be to get a hold of samples of these things.

      dfj

  29. No thanks by Rashdot · · Score: 1

    If I want strong beer I'll just stick to Westmalle Tripel (9.4%).

    --
    This is not the sig you're looking for.
  30. flaming beer! by woboyle · · Score: 1

    I can just see it now, a guy is in a bar drinking his beer and smoking when suddenly... "Hey mister! Your beer's on fire!".

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  31. So what to call it? by dacarr · · Score: 1

    OK, so you distill wine, it becomes brandy. You distill beer - a beverage made by yeast-fermenting malt sugars fortified with hops (and without said hops, it's not beer, it's basically a barleywine) - and what to call it?

    --
    This sig no verb.
  32. tastes like shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    any beer over 12% starts to taste like scotch/bourbon. Its not much different than dropping a shot of whiskey into your beer. for the record they've been using ale yeast and heavier gravities to get beer up to 10 - 12 percent for a while without distillation. Of course the calories in those beers is insane.. like 400 cal beers but who needs to eat? LOL. Liquid Bread.

  33. All I learned about Beer, I learned from the Bard. by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    A long time ago, way back in history,
    when all there was to drink was nothin but cups of tea.
    Along came a man by the name of Charlie Mops,
    and he invented a wonderful drink and he made it out of hops.

    He must have been an admiral a sultan or a king,
    and to his praises we shall always sing.
    Look what he has done for us he's filled us up with cheer!
    Lord bless Charlie Mops, the man who invented beer beer beer
    tiddly beer beer beer.

    The Curtis bar, the James' Pub, the Hole in the Wall as well
    one thing you can be sure of, its Charlie's beer they sell
    so all ye lads a lasses at eleven O'clock ye stop
    for five short seconds, remember Charlie Mops 1 2 3 4 5

    He must have been an admiral a sultan or a king,
    and to his praises we shall always sing.
    Look what he has done for us he's filled us up with cheer!
    Lord bless Charlie Mops, the man who invented beer beer beer
    tiddly beer beer beer.

    A barrel of malt, a bushel of hops, you stir it around with a stick,
    the kind of lubrication to make your engine tick.
    40 pints of wallop a day will keep away the quacks.
    Its only eight pence hapenny and one and six in tax, 1 2 3 4 5

    He must have been an admiral a sultan or a king,
    and to his praises we shall always sing.
    Look what he has done for us he's filled us up with cheer!
    Lord bless Charlie Mops, the man who invented beer beer beer
    tiddly beer beer beer.

    The Lord bless Charlie Mops!

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  34. I'm a brewer - the yeast will die by edfardos · · Score: 1

    The ABV limit is regulated by the yeast's tolerance to alcohol. There are very few strains that could survive and exhibit anerobic respiration at 20%ABV. Even if they did, the bad ethers and esters produced would taste like crap. (or bitter apple, or banana, or cinnamon).

    1. Re:I'm a brewer - the yeast will die by Disfnord · · Score: 1

      Hence the whole freeze-distilling thing mentioned in the summary...

  35. Relatively new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose if you're comparing freeze distillation to beer in general, the technique is new. But applejack (freeze distilled hard apple cider) has been around since at least colonial times (in the US), which means the technique has probably been around quite a bit longer. Just because the author of TFA first heard of freeze distilling upon researching Bud Ice doesn't mean that's when the technique came to be.

  36. No kidding. by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Once you distill beer to achieve higher alcohol content, it's... not beer anymore. This is freaking ridiculous.

  37. Realistically, though... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    ... not very much methanol is actually produced in the process of fermentation. Typically, methanol formation requires the presence of pectin, which wouldn't normally be found in wort, and even then, very little is formed. A bigger issue is the formation of fusel alcohols, which are removed in the process of heat distilling, but remain with the distillate in freeze distilling. These higher order alcohols can produce off flavors in the product, and some believe them to be contributors to hangover symptoms, although some studies dispute this.

    1. Re:Realistically, though... by Zouden · · Score: 1

      Sure, but when making whisky (or any other spirit), the starting material is something one would not normally drink, and the distillation process removes the unpleasant flavours. But in this case, the starting material is beer. There's no need to remove fusel alcohols or methanol because they aren't there to begin with.

      --
      "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    2. Re:Realistically, though... by 5c11 · · Score: 1

      There's no need to remove fusel alcohols or methanol because they aren't there to begin with.

      While it's true that there shouldn't be any methanol, yeast can and do sometimes form fusel alcohols during the process of fermentation. It's usually caused by underpitching the yeast or fermenting your beer too hot.

      It's noticeable as a "hot" alcohol flavor in beers (and especially in young meads) and can give some people a wicked headache. On the plus side, fusels in beer will eventually break down into shorter chain alcohols, which is why high gravity beers and meads often need to be aged for awhile to mellow out.

      (Took the BJCP course, but never took the test).

  38. Realistically, though... by sean.peters · · Score: 3, Informative
    ... there's practically no methanol produced in the process of fermentation. For it to be produced at all, there needs to be some pectin present, and that wouldn't normally be found in beer. A bigger problem is the presence of fusel alcohols. These higher order alcohols are removed to a greater or lesser degree during the process of heat distilling, but remain with the distillate in freeze distilling. They can add off flavors to the product, and some believe they are contributors to hangover symptoms, although some studies apparently dispute this.

    Methanol in Prohibition-era hootch was present as an adulterant - in other words, it was deliberately added to bathtub gin because it was cheap, and the producers didn't particularly care about their customers' health. Much like melamine was added to various Chinese products to make them appear more protein-rich.

  39. Malt liquor is not distilled by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    It's just made more strongly than normal beer, but it isn't distilled. As such, about the highest alcohol concentration you can achieve is around 12-15%.

  40. The world's strongest beer was 27% ABV by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

    Was that Sam Adams Utopia? I think that is something like $200 USD a bottle...the Dom Perignon of beer.

  41. You can't get to 50% by Freezing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't get to 50% ABV using freeze distiallation. The azeotrope for ice-ethanol is near 40%. The sugar content of the brew affects this number as well, but you can't push it to 50%. Once you hit the fractional azeotrope, you're stuck.

    Unless they're adding some sort of benzene molecule to furthur refine the ethanol, you can't get it to freeze any farther. And I sincerely hope one one thinks it's a good idea to but benzene or petrolium products into a beer.

  42. That's Dissapointing by potat0man · · Score: 1

    From the title I thought someone had made a yeast that could survive in 50% alcohol. It'd make making homemade fuel a bit easier.

    Nope, someone just invented liquor again. I guess that's good...

  43. TNP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got 2 bottles of Tactical Nuclear Penguin for Christmas. Let me just say that I would definitely call this beer, though you drink it like liquor.
    It tastes like beer, its carbonated slightly and it is oh so fucking delicious. It has an unexpected potency to it.

    I still have one bottle left that I'm going to let age for a while.

  44. Eisbock by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    It might not taste like crap, though. I've had some damn tasty eisbock (Kulmbacher's) that was made by a less-extreme version of what they're talking about. It's not that I want a 50% ABV beer, but don't write it off immediately.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  45. It shouldn't be a problem by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Actually, it shouldn't really be a problem at all.

    Methanol is a problem when you _only_ have methanol in your system, or at least more methanol than ethanol. The enzyme alcohol-dehydrogenase transforms it into formic acid which is poison to the mitochondria.

    When ethanol is present too, though, that enzyme has a higher affinity to the ethanol than methanol. Given enough ethanol in the system, only trace quantities of methanol will be processed to something toxic, and the rest will go out via the kidneys and smaller quantities out the lungs.

    So basically if you suspect you've ingested a small quantity of methanol, the best antidote you can get is to wash it down with a pint of vodka.

    Which is to say that this beer probably has enough antidote in it.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  46. Movin' on up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the local street people

    Goodbye $2 bottle of Mad Dog, hello $35 bottle of elite one-of-a-kind ale.

    Of course they will need to throw away the brown bag and acquire a proper pint glass or white wine snifter.

  47. It's not pointless at all! by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hey, maybe you weren't into it. I can understand. It's hot outside and I want my beer relatively light.. right now.

    But the thing about beer is that higher alcohol tends to result in more flavor. Not counting freeze distillation (the topic here), or tasteless adjuncts (e.g. rice syrup), the way to pump up a beer's alcohol is to add more malt. That means more malt flavor, and sometimes malt flavor can be damn damn good. Try some doppelbocks or English barleywines.

    Then it gets more complex, because if you wanna offset the malt sweetness, you have to hop it more, so again: more flavors. Try some American barleywines.

    I know; it's June, so if you're in the northern hemisphere, maybe this isn't appealing right now. But if you're a beer geek you're gonna be beggin' for it in 5 months.

    Sometimes the brewer wants more flavor, and increased alcohol is just the side-effect. And sometimes increased alcohol is good too. But this is a totally different thing than hard booze, and hard booze just can't compete with it. You're gonna have all kinds of people wanting to try this stuff who wouldn't touch vodka. That said, I think a 50% ABV beer is ridiculous. But c'mon, these are geek brewers. There are all kinds of limits they're probably pushing, and ABV is just one of them. If you think extreme brewing is just for fratboys, then blame the media for only presenting the fratboy dimension of it.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  48. wimps by whitroth · · Score: 1

    See/hear Tom Smith's "307 Ale"
      or hear him at

    "A bheer brewed in a tesseract..."

                      mark

  49. In related news by GlassMaster · · Score: 1

    The record for the world's most powerful beer goggles has been broken.

  50. Alcohol isn't the only thing concentrated by gregor-e · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Freeze-distillation consists of partially freezing beer then removing the ice, which has more water than alcohol. Each time a bit of ice is tossed, fractionally more alcohol is left behind. They repeat this process until the liquid fraction is as strong as they care for. Of course, alcohol isn't the only thing that gets left out of the ice when it forms. You get to keep all of the other crap the yeast poop out in addition to alcohol. Stuff like methanol, acetone, isopropyl and iso-amyl alcohol. These are called congeners, and they're responsible for a good percentage of your hangover. A proper still will let you selectively include or leave out these congeners. But freeze distillation keeps them all. Concentrates them. Makes their flavor and after-effects more intense for each fluid ounce you drink. Kind of pointless, in my opinion.

    Now, genetic engineering of a yeast that can tolerate higher alcohol concentration without producing a lot of congeners - that would be something worth doing.

  51. Been doing this for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not a 'new' idea. 25 years ago, (when I was a poor college student), I and a couple of buddies had a desire for cheep ethyl alcohol (ethynol). We fermented yeast and fruit, and made (quite copious) amounts (I remember at one point having bottled more than 30 cases). Some of it was really smooth. It had a nice clean taste and had a clear to slightly pink color, but BANG! all of a sudden the room is slightly off center. Good stuff (usually about 18% which is where the yeast would die off). We didn't experiment with heating (distilling) it, but we did experiment with freezing it. Get a metal pot, pour the alcohol in, put it in the deep freeze and lower the temperature. 2 hours later, pour into a second pot. Ice will freeze on the metal pot, alcohol will remain a liquid. We didn't trust that we were freezing just water, so we would melt the ice and drink it too (very slight amount of alcohol) and after repeating the process 2 or 3 times, we would (by using our calibrated hydrometer to measure the specific gravity), determine that the alcohol content was about 36%. We found that that was a good place to stop. It still had great taste, but you had to go a bit easier on it. Still if someone were celebrating graduation, we could pull it out and use it for toasts, and it was really good. As I say, that was 25 years ago, and not a new idea.

  52. Honest Officer by shinnie · · Score: 1

    I only had two beers.

  53. Mod Original Article "Lack of Research" by Plekto · · Score: 1

    This has already been done. With fermentation and old-school (no tech) technology.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Awamori

    This is normally 40-50 proof, but one variety, Hanazake, is 120 proof.

    It's not normally exported outside of Japan, so almost nobody knows of it.

    Using the same techniques, they should easily be able to get 100 proof beer. But it's not like this is something that hasn't been done before.

    1. Re:Mod Original Article "Lack of Research" by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      How is it distilled? While the beers mentioned in the article are freeze distilled (and IMHO should not be considered a beer for this reason), I would assume freeze distilling removes mainly water while leaving the other components(and concentrating poisons such as methanol and fusel alchohols!), while most other distillation methods remove the alcohol from the other components. If the alcohol you mention is boiler distilled, 120 proof is no big accomplishment. You could achieve virtually 200 proof using that method.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    2. Re:Mod Original Article "Lack of Research" by Plekto · · Score: 1

      Traditional Awamori(40-50 proof varieties) is distilled without heat and often aged by concentrating it with older batches as a "seed" and is truly a zero-tech, if time consuming process(a batch takes 3-10 years to make, same as whiskey or good scotch). I'm not sure what method those three companies are using(all on one tiny island in Japan - go figure) to further distill the Awamori to 120 proof.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yonaguni - of note - well, the ONLY thing of note about the tiny island other than it being the westernmost island in Japan - is the three distilleries that make hanazake.

      Note - a lot of modern Awamori is distilled using modern techniques to speed up the process, but it's possible to do in one batch/step, like Scotch or Whiskey.

      http://www.sake-world.com/html/shochu-awamori.html

      It's basically rice whiskey, or close to it. Again, doing the same thing with traditional beer should be fairly simple, though I suspect it would be nearly undrinkable by itself due to the extreme bitterness of concentrated hops combined with the high alcohol content.

  54. I guess they were right in Bottom Live 2003 by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2, Funny

    There does appear to be a "Weapons grade lager"...

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  55. capsaicin and alcohol by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    You know what's really interesting? Because capsaicin is freely soluble in alcohol, one of the "best" ways to get rid of a mouth full of hot is to rinse with pure ethyl alcohol.

    I put "best" in quotations because I'd rather have a mouthful of habanero than a mouthful of everclear.

    So the question is, this crazy-hot schnapps you mention: does the burn stay around a shorter period of time? If the capsaicin is soluble in alcohol, does that reduce it's ability to bind to the right receptors on your tongue?

    Just food (or drink) for thought...

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
    1. Re:capsaicin and alcohol by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I put "best" in quotations because I'd rather have a mouthful of habanero than a mouthful of everclear.

      I like hot food... but this has its limits...

      And then I like everclear...

      Guess which one I’d rather have a mouthful of?

      Hint: One of them numbs quickly, then goes down and quits burning...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:capsaicin and alcohol by hweimer · · Score: 1

      So the question is, this crazy-hot schnapps you mention: does the burn stay around a shorter period of time?

      Well, to know that I would have to compare it to 2cl of a 400k SCO substance dissolved in water, which I'd rather not prefer to taste voluntarily. The Kehlenschneider burns about five minutes in an almost unbearable way, then the pain gradually goes away over the course of half an hour.

      --
      OS Reviews: Free and Open Source Software
  56. But what about.... by avm · · Score: 1

    ...Helping ugly people have sex? Does it do any better at fostering reproductive urges in the less-than-photogenic than your average brew? Inquiring minds want to know!

  57. I don't mind a strong beer... by puppetman · · Score: 1

    6% or 7% IPAs are good.

    I also like the La Fin Du Monde at 9%, and Maudite at 8%... Both come in a cool bottle with a cork. Not sure if they are available in the US....

    Anything above that sounds silly, as I can't imagine it tasting good. I brew beer at home, and never bother checking the alcohol level - I brew for taste, not ability to cause inebriation.

    1. Re:I don't mind a strong beer... by Silfax · · Score: 1

      I also like the La Fin Du Monde at 9%, and Maudite at 8%... Both come in a cool bottle with a cork. Not sure if they are available in the US....

      Available on a state by state basis. When it comes to alcohol the US is 50+ countries (some states it can be limited on a county by county or even a town by town level).

      I am all for state rights, but for some things it makes sense to regulate at a federal level (mostly the fun stuff -- guns, booze, drugs & sex).

  58. Freeze distillation is not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Germans have been doing that for a few centuries - look up "Eisbock" on Wikipedia. It can reach 40% ABV, but those I know who've tasted it tell me it's pretty disgusting.

  59. Is it beer after 19%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always thought if the beer was over 19% it wasn't classified as a beer but rather a wine or spirits?

  60. One question? by Nekomusume · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Have they figured out how to make it taste good?

  61. 41%, not 27% by Warhawke · · Score: 1

    Yes, yes, I know the controversy over freeze production "beers" but the 27% they're referring to is Sam Adams Utopias, which releases only 10,000 bottles in a production run. I was fortunate enough to sample some last night. However, this is not the highest percentage alcohol beer by conventional standards of what constitutes beer (malt, hops, water, yeast). That honor would go to Scottish brewery known as BrewDog for their 41% "Sink the Bismarck", ousting their 32% ABV Tactical Nuclear Penguin.

  62. who fucking cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHO FUCKING CARES

  63. Suuure by yukk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One article in idle about beer and suddenly Idle is the coolest place in town.
    Not a single Idle is pants post in sight !

    You're all drunken hypocrites :)

    --
    The trouble with the rat race is that even if you win, you're still a rat." Lily Tomlin
  64. Augustiner by tom17 · · Score: 1

    Did you try an Augie?
    Mmmmm Augustiner... (my fave beer anywhere)
    Don't like the 'fest beers too much, although you soon get back into the spirit of them after a couple of days :)

    1. Re:Augustiner by tom17 · · Score: 1

      I should qualify that.. the Augie is my fave of the Helleses. I am also rather fond of Franziskaner Weissbier :)

  65. Armani Jeans, Lee Jeans, Levis Jeans, Diesel Jeans by Corrinla · · Score: 0

    Here is a unique collection of armani jeans, Lee Jeans, levis jeans, designer jeans sale on our website, jeanshotsale.com. All of them are in good quality and cheap price.