I know stories about this are all the rage, but I've yet to be asked if I have a facebook acct and I've considered 8 jobs this year. Maybe it's different when you're being recruited than when you're going begging though.
Because at some point you have to translate the solution to a binary format in order to realize it. Also, it's still easier to lay out the circuits that way, basically all of the tools are optimized for binary layouts.
I don't know what to say. Your effort to misunderstand me seems deliberate at this point, which makes me think I'm being trolled. I think I've adequately clarified the meaning I intended at this point for anyone else in the non-existent audience at this point.:-)
Nah, training period just means a time of typically zero productivity. Paying more for zero productivity is still better than paying less for negative productivity.
But at some level this isn't different from any other control exerted by any other game. Angry birds incents you to push certain buttons. Would you push those buttons in that way without Angry Birds? No.
Big companies are rarely based on big ideas. Instead, they are based on ruthlessly destroying competition. Take Google for example. Lots of people had their ideas, but Google had the funding to put down their competitors.
Statistically speaking, the problem is that the 40M CEO never worked for $1. Most (and we're not even near 50% here) of the rich were born that way. If mobility into the 1% were significant, people would be much less upset about it.
Taxes, prices, consumption, production, it all comes down to labor producing assets and those assets (proxied by money) flowing around the system. In the end, who winds up with the assets that are produced by the labor? The 1%. Arguing over any of the rest is just fighting over the scraps. If you're unhappy with the way the world works, find a way to kill a 1%er. It's the only way things will actually improve.
Slashdot Mirror
I know stories about this are all the rage, but I've yet to be asked if I have a facebook acct and I've considered 8 jobs this year. Maybe it's different when you're being recruited than when you're going begging though.
I think that was called Peter Pan.
Again with your top-down we'll tell you what to think and how to say it mindset. Get it through your neanderthal skull that you don't control us!
Sorry, living languages are the purest form of democracy, your 1%er mindset just doesn't get to rule here.
Feel free to provide some contrary evidence.
Whoosh!
Because at some point you have to translate the solution to a binary format in order to realize it. Also, it's still easier to lay out the circuits that way, basically all of the tools are optimized for binary layouts.
You really shouldn't of. Since English is a non-dead language, and this usage is now more common then the other, it is now the correct usage.
I don't know what to say. Your effort to misunderstand me seems deliberate at this point, which makes me think I'm being trolled. I think I've adequately clarified the meaning I intended at this point for anyone else in the non-existent audience at this point. :-)
That's can interpret, not must interpret.
The market isn't that efficient. It wishes it was, but it isn't.
I don't interpret cause and compel as the same word.
How about one search engine with multiple algorithms, giving you the first N hits based on different ranking algorithms.
Bleah, I'm lucky if I can find what I'm looking for before page 5 on Google these days. I remember when it was almost always in the first 3 results.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/made
I meant 2a, or more precisely 15.
Nah, training period just means a time of typically zero productivity. Paying more for zero productivity is still better than paying less for negative productivity.
Is this some sort of encryption program embedding data in slashdot?
What made you sign the contract? Was it an incentive by any chance?
But at some level this isn't different from any other control exerted by any other game. Angry birds incents you to push certain buttons. Would you push those buttons in that way without Angry Birds? No.
This is exactly why the NSA suffers from chronic breakins. There's just no way to fully secure software.
Big companies are rarely based on big ideas. Instead, they are based on ruthlessly destroying competition. Take Google for example. Lots of people had their ideas, but Google had the funding to put down their competitors.
That's pretty much the way to both start networking, and get some feedback on your skills so you can improve.
Statistically speaking, the problem is that the 40M CEO never worked for $1. Most (and we're not even near 50% here) of the rich were born that way. If mobility into the 1% were significant, people would be much less upset about it.
Yeah, but do it for long enough, and people will start to think twice about getting in line.
There's a simpler way to look at it:
Taxes, prices, consumption, production, it all comes down to labor producing assets and those assets (proxied by money) flowing around the system. In the end, who winds up with the assets that are produced by the labor? The 1%. Arguing over any of the rest is just fighting over the scraps. If you're unhappy with the way the world works, find a way to kill a 1%er. It's the only way things will actually improve.