Slashdot Mirror


User: Surt

Surt's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
8,792
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 8,792

  1. Re:We don't "see" much more matter on LHC Research May Help Explain the Universe's Matter/Antimatter Imbalance · · Score: 4, Informative

    We know what annihilation looks like. If there were anti-stars in our galaxy, we'd see some substantial annihilation signatures in the mixing in nebulae for example. Even if whole galaxies were anit-matter, we'd see some signature where the galaxies mix. The smallest unit of mass that could be anti matter unnoticeably is probably the supercluster. Even then, doubtful that we couldn't see annihilation signatures along the great walls, for example.

  2. Re:Observable universe on LHC Research May Help Explain the Universe's Matter/Antimatter Imbalance · · Score: 1

    Well I have good news and bad news:
    The good news is, we don't have to worry about ever losing the moon.
    The bad news is that the reason will be the sun puffing up into a red giant, vaporizing both planets, long before the moon would be lost to us.

  3. Re:Observable universe on LHC Research May Help Explain the Universe's Matter/Antimatter Imbalance · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The unobservable universe is the infinite portion beyond the light speed horizon.
    If you really want to be depressed, think about future civilizations in our galaxy for whom all other galaxies will have retreated beyond the light speed horizon. They will have a much harder time figuring out how the universe works.

    Now realize that we may already be one of those future civilizations from the perspective of the lucky folks who got to see the universe early on.

  4. Re:...the fuck? on LHC Research May Help Explain the Universe's Matter/Antimatter Imbalance · · Score: 1

    The universe we can see is primarily made up of matter. We know because there are characteristics of antimatter that would allow us to know if we were looking at an anti-galaxy, for example. But we don't know why there is so much matter, and not anti-matter, because the laws of physics we understand so far are neutral. So to explain the universe we see, there must be some rule we don't know about yet, which explains why the universe heavily favors matter.

    This story is about a high-energy physics experiment which revealed a result which will help to explain the discrepancy if it can be confirmed. It will guide us towards that new rule to explain this particular mystery of the universe.

  5. Re:It IS extortion on Two Porn Companies Take ICANN and .xxx Registrar To Court · · Score: 2

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICANN#History

    Domains really couldn't truly be free forever. When the first troll arrived on the internet, dispute resolution became necessary, and that meant more employees and costs, going well beyond what a few volunteers could do with their spare time.

  6. Re:First post! on B&N Pummels Microsoft Patent Claims With Prior Art · · Score: 1

    And just how many first posts do you imagine there have been? Maybe 100 billion by now, a trillion even?

  7. Re:First post! on B&N Pummels Microsoft Patent Claims With Prior Art · · Score: 1

    Just reflect for a moment on what you're suggesting. There was a halcyon day in the past, when the idea of a first post had literally not been invented yet. Some person actually first came up with it, and then it caught fire. It is one of the most successful memes in history, replicated through millions of brains. Quite possibly more brains than any religion. It is a true masterpiece of human thought.

  8. Re:Supernovas on OPERA Group Repeats Faster-Than-Light Neutrino Results · · Score: 1

    But places are dimensions.

  9. Re:Supernovas on OPERA Group Repeats Faster-Than-Light Neutrino Results · · Score: 1

    That is not the going theory.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino#Mass

  10. Re:Supernovas on OPERA Group Repeats Faster-Than-Light Neutrino Results · · Score: 1

    Just substitute "there's an obvious reason to prefer" for "he believes" and you'll understand.

  11. Re:Pointless on Microsoft Patent Aims To Curb Obnoxious Employee Behavior · · Score: 1

    The point is that you're wrong about 'anyone'. It matters to many a PHB who notices.

  12. Re:wtb patent to curb obnoxious patents on Microsoft Patent Aims To Curb Obnoxious Employee Behavior · · Score: 1

    Are you kidding? Every fortune 500 company will buy this, and pay through the nose to have it. This might be the most profitable idea MS has had in a decade or more.

  13. Re:GPS tracking error on OPERA Group Repeats Faster-Than-Light Neutrino Results · · Score: 1

    There was such a claim. OPERA claims they corrected for the potential GPS error.

  14. Re:Supernovas on OPERA Group Repeats Faster-Than-Light Neutrino Results · · Score: 2

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SN_1987A#Neutrino_emissions

    Basically: the light's departure was delayed.

  15. Re:If you need metrics to know who your stars are on The Futility of Developer Productivity Metrics · · Score: 1

    I completely agree, that's why I qualified my statement with the if.

  16. Re:So I should stop on Toronto School Bans Hard Balls · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, I think anyone who has started that practice should probably never stop ... best for the gene pool really.

  17. Re:If you need metrics to know who your stars are on The Futility of Developer Productivity Metrics · · Score: 2

    Yeah, that's an upper management failure in my book. They should be connected well enough to know what is going on at least two levels down, not one (enabling them to check the calibration of their direct reports). If that's not possible, the branching factor is probably too high.

  18. Re:What about non-coding time? on The Futility of Developer Productivity Metrics · · Score: 1

    Design is about as clearly non-CVA as it comes. Implementation is CVA. This is pretty much the whole philosophy behind agile.

  19. If you need metrics to know who your stars are ... on The Futility of Developer Productivity Metrics · · Score: 2

    ... you are already doomed. You've gone so far down the wrong path there's no hope of recovery.

  20. Re:I propose we Occupy "Occupy" on Occupy Flash? · · Score: 4, Funny

    As a die-hard Twilight fan, and member of team centenarian pedophile, I resent this.

  21. Re:Remember to keep our priorities in focus on Net Neutrality and Carrier Incentives To Invest · · Score: 1

    He's just suffering brain damage from his encounter with the Italian water drinking conspirators.

  22. Re:Doesn't scale on $50,000 To Solve the Most Complicated Puzzle Ever · · Score: 1

    Sorry, to be clear I was saying 4 have to be solved after the first one, in order to frame it the same way as the parent.

  23. Re:Must be some AFL-CIO people .. on AFL-CIO and Big Content Advocate For SOPA · · Score: 1

    Give them some time, man, that's a lot of legs to break.

  24. Re:Why? on Boeing Delivers Massive Ordnance Penetrator · · Score: 2

    You tell them you have a bomb that will go five miles deep. This forces your opponent to spend a lot of money digging themselves in 6 miles deep. You don't even have to have said bomb for this strategy to work.

  25. Re:It's life, Jim on Life-Bearing Lake Possible On Icy Jupiter Moon · · Score: 1

    It's an exceedingly small number, picked because I bet most people would guess that life might be less rare than that.
    But indeed, we really don't know the actual rarity. Personally, I bet it's more like one in a million or better. The chemistry of life is just not that complicated.