The first reason is can go away if Microsoft would use ATUI instead of the old quickdraw drawing before the next version of Mac OS X comes out. I know of many Carbon apps which can use quartz text.
I use OmniWeb for all my web browsing and it is great. It blocks the ads in/. and others. It even blocks pop-up javascript windows. The only problem I have with 4.1 is that there is no way to use a proxy. If the javascript does not work, I use IE to see if it is OmniWeb that is causing the problem.
Java can crash OmniWeb but I always send the backtrace in with a description of what I was doing, mainly http://games.yahoo.com.
Altivect is not only for floating-point, it includes 8/16/32/64bit integers vectors of size 16/8/4/2 respectively. So it can be used to copy data from a specific spot in memory to any other spot fast.
Like Microsoft does provide gcc with the POSIX extensions to WinNT/Win2K, see Microsoft was even lying to itself. Micosoft should be fined for the lie they should committed.
Actually I would say this is a windows problem for being able to replace DUN DLL's. On the Mac there is an aol driver that looks like an ethernet card/dail-up(ppp) also there are different drivers for slip.
It will not be less code bloat, the code size would be the same but the code will compile faster because the compiler would have to go through as much code.
One of the bug reports for gcc against the linux kernel was strcpy(string,"a"+0X40000) was being optimized into string[0]="" which is a legal optimization in ISO C(aka ANSI C) with -O2. Even Linus got involved but he even says that linux needs to compile with -O2 which is wrong for any program for that to happen. So linux is busted in terms of complicy with the ISO C. Also linux depends on some gcc extensions.
Also gcc 3.0 start the depeation of strings that wrap over more than one line which was an undocumented extension and made the compiler not compliant. The source code of Linux used this a lot so they need to fix all of those problems before using gcc 3.0 and above.
When you run an office program on Mac OS X there is stupid background app that runs and takes up memory and cpu time, I say it is useless, why don't they just use a shared library and put the code in each app. I think it used for OLE but there mach messages for that.
Also Office should start using mach messages for OLE instead of just shared memory because mach messages can go between computers, not just between apps.
Java support on IE and/or mozila sucks too.
The first reason is can go away if Microsoft would use ATUI instead of the old quickdraw drawing before the next version of Mac OS X comes out.
I know of many Carbon apps which can use quartz text.
I use OmniWeb for all my web browsing and it is great. It blocks the ads in /. and others. It even blocks pop-up javascript windows.
The only problem I have with 4.1 is that there is no way to use a proxy.
If the javascript does not work, I use IE to see if it is OmniWeb that is causing the problem.
Java can crash OmniWeb but I always send the backtrace in with a description of what I was doing, mainly http://games.yahoo.com.
What is wrong with Perl?
File a bug report if there is something wrong: http://bugreport.apple.com.
Altivect is not only for floating-point, it includes 8/16/32/64bit integers vectors of size 16/8/4/2 respectively. So it can be used to copy data from a specific spot in memory to any other spot fast.
UCB still does not like the fact it BSD has an open source license.
there was an article on slapdash about science, grants, and public domain.
Like Microsoft does provide gcc with the POSIX extensions to WinNT/Win2K, see Microsoft was even lying to itself. Micosoft should be fined for the lie they should committed.
The Best Ada compiler available is part of gcc now.
Actually I would say this is a windows problem for being able to replace DUN DLL's.
On the Mac there is an aol driver that looks like an ethernet card/dail-up(ppp) also there are different drivers for slip.
The DNA sequence cannot be patented but drug targets can be though.
both
Actually the GNAT will be included in gcc 3.1
read about it on http://gcc.gnu.org
don't use gcc's man page but use its info page, by `info gcc'
It will not be less code bloat, the code size would be the same but the code will compile faster because the compiler would have to go through as much code.
gcc is missing export and some other stuff see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for more examples of what is missing, scroll down.
some older phones pre-800MHz are much better than most news dealing with batters they last longer.
But there was some talk about releasing a 2.95.4 release but that talk fized down now.
Everyone knows that the BSD random(3) is better and faster than the ISO rand(3).
That is why gcc is changing the option name to -funsafe-math-optimizations.
One of the bug reports for gcc against the linux kernel was strcpy(string,"a"+0X40000) was being optimized into string[0]="" which is a legal optimization in ISO C(aka ANSI C) with -O2.
Even Linus got involved but he even says that linux needs to compile with -O2 which is wrong for any program for that to happen. So linux is busted in terms of complicy with the ISO C. Also linux depends on some gcc extensions.
Also gcc 3.0 start the depeation of strings that wrap over more than one line which was an undocumented extension and made the compiler not compliant. The source code of Linux used this a lot so they need to fix all of those problems before using gcc 3.0 and above.
When you run an office program on Mac OS X there is stupid background app that runs and takes up memory and cpu time, I say it is useless, why don't they just use a shared library and put the code in each app. I think it used for OLE but there mach messages for that.
Also Office should start using mach messages for OLE instead of just shared memory because mach messages can go between computers, not just between apps.
I would also open up the API that INTERX uses, and win32.dll uses.
Microsoft has Windows Media Player out for the Mac, it should have been just called NetPlay and not changed its name
Microsoft was selling a version for the Mac until Winblows95 came out.
Even the earlier stuff was trying to emulate UNIX software.
There has been some non-emulating projects, emacs.