Slashdot Mirror


User: jo42

jo42's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,120
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,120

  1. Re:Regarding Microsoft's Security Initiative on The Myth of Open Source Security Revisited v2.0 · · Score: 1
    > I wonder what they've planned for the other 27 days...

    TCP, UDP and anything else they can think of over XML, haven't you heard?

  2. Re:no need to rewrite everything on Cryptogram Judges MS Security · · Score: 1
    Wearing my network administrator hat, I would like to kick in the nuts of whoever thought it up.
    Ditto. And all the other protocols being shoved over port 80 (HTTP).
  3. Re:Remarkable: Already slashdotted on Alan Cox Interview · · Score: 1

    And the forkers get paid $1 million each per episode. And I thought that forker Seinfeld was overpaid at $0.5 million per episode...

  4. Re:no need to rewrite everything on Cryptogram Judges MS Security · · Score: 1

    Don't forget wide open default file system permissions (Everyone full on \), or poorly thought out default file system permissions (Everyone full on \Inetpub).

  5. Re:Anti-innovation on Cryptogram Judges MS Security · · Score: 1
    > including default configurations.

    Does this mean that they will no longer pull asinine stunts like giving Everyone full access to the root of an NTFS drive? Or giving Everyone full access to \Inetpub\* in default installations? Or installing NetMeeting, Media Player and other cr*p on a server?

    And when will this happen, mebbe 2 years from now when they release Windows XP 2004 (or whatever the fork their marketing droids call it)?

  6. Re: the text. on Alan Cox Interview · · Score: 1
    Nyet!

    cyfanswm_yr_ymwelwÿr += 42;
    is the correct answer.
  7. Re:How to REALLY penetrate the Desktop on Alan Cox Interview · · Score: 1

    But then it wouldn't be Linux now, would it?

  8. Re:XML is no longer simple on W3C Recommends XML Signature Syntax · · Score: 1

    XML is just another, complicated, file format. Whoopee shite.

  9. Re:XMLDSIG in the .NET Framework on W3C Recommends XML Signature Syntax · · Score: 1

    First you wankers shoved everything up HTTP's wazoo, now you are shoving everything up XML's wazoo. Say, why don't you implement TCP and UDP over XML?

  10. Re:Pay Pal and Ebay on PayPal Goes Public · · Score: 1

    PayPal's VISA is actually done by Providian.

  11. Re:Why should exhibitors pay to upgrade to digital on Lack of Digital Screens for Attack of the Clones · · Score: 1
    > The DLP system is no match for film yet.

    Until you see a 'large' moving panning shot, like the few in LoTR:FoTR, and you go "ARGH! FILM SUCKS!!".

  12. Re:Marketing At Work on Project Copycat Clones A Cat · · Score: 1

    Oooh... Two (2) pussies for the price of one!

  13. Re:Who modded this down? on States Demand Windows Source Code · · Score: 1
    > Since when do criminals get to negotiate their punishment?

    When they have lots of money.

  14. Re:hmm on SourceForge Terms of Service Change, Users Unhappy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Punch the little f'agit the wrote this forkin' software. Please.

  15. Re:SNMP's a pretty damned scary protocol anyway on Security Hole In SNMP · · Score: 1
    > Ever heard of SNMPv3?

    Oh, you mean CNMPv1 (Complicated Network Management Protocol)...

  16. Re:Hrmmm.... on Towards an Internet-Scale Operating System · · Score: 1

    Only as long as I can charge for usage of my CPU time, disk space and bandwidth, will I dedicate hardware to this silly buggery.

  17. Re:Another Oscar Note... on 13 Nominations to Rule Them All · · Score: 1

    ...and if Shrek had been called "Green Ogre, Farting Donkey", it would have gotten at least 8 or 10 nominations.

  18. Re:Sweet on New Sensor Has Real Per-Pixel RGB Sensitivity · · Score: 1

    Excellent, better flesh tones on pr0n fotos!

  19. Re:Futurists are stupid on Operating Systems of the Future · · Score: 1
    How about slowing down this insane hardware and software product release cycle first to actually give things time to be developed to some adequate depth, resulting in stable and reliable systems? Look at how long it is taking the Holy Linux Kernel Tribunal to come up with a solid kernel. Or look at the unholy mess that Messysoft is kludging on top of Windows NT technology - just how many API layers do we really need to slow down 2+ GHz processors? At one point, a few years ago, I used to love the computer technology industry. Now I despise it with a passion for the shite it is excreting.

    Mod this down to flame bait, I dare ya, punk.

  20. Re:And making.... on Operating Systems of the Future · · Score: 1

    Truly scary idea this. Would give viruses a whole new level of terrorism...

  21. Re:You mean comments like this: on 2.5.4 Kernel Out · · Score: 1
    > have_sex()

    ld: unresolved function "_have_sex" - link failed.

  22. Re:Intel's next chip will be... on Inside the Itanium · · Score: 1

    Nah, "Bullwankium".

  23. Teach them something useful on Testing Technology on a Veritable Army of Children? · · Score: 1

    Teach them to use their own brains and not become parts of PR stunt for people who have more dollars than sense. Teach them that marketing and advertising are a capitalistic evil. Teach them to think for themselves.

  24. Re:This is how Google started on Google Programming Contest · · Score: 1

    Then, instead of offering the teacher a shiny red apple, you gift them a butt plug from the local adult store - get's the message across real quick like.

  25. Re:Hasn't this already been done... on Intel Developing Cellular Internet Chip · · Score: 1
    Just smeggin', forkin' great, now we will all have cancer for sure. Pffht! on this dumb-arse idea and all the other poop being excreted by corporations to part us with more of our money.

    You'll find me hiking the Grand Canyon.