Slashdot Mirror


User: AndroidCat

AndroidCat's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
7,894
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 7,894

  1. Re:Disappointed! on Alien Case Mod · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Alien Inside"?

  2. Re:look at me, i'm suing google!! on Searchking Loses Suit Against Google · · Score: 1

    He was a spammer, probably still is, only now keeps his company name better hidden.

  3. Re:awful layout on Searchking Loses Suit Against Google · · Score: 1

    It looks like SearchKing used to spam. Are you sure you want to try that here? (Of course, this is trusting a DejaGoogle search... :^)

  4. Re:Offshore computing center? on Buy Your Own Aircraft Carrier · · Score: 1

    Sure, but not SDF-1, Macross "whole town" big like the parent post suggested. It'd be tight for a crew of Zentraedi. :^)

  5. In comparision: on Buy Your Own Aircraft Carrier · · Score: 1
    The USS Enterprise (WWII):
    • Displacement 25,484 tons FL 32,060 tons FL
    • Length @ WL 770' 770'
    • Length Overall 809'6" 827'5"
    • Width @ WL 83'2" 109'6"
    • Width @ FD 108'11" 114'2"
    • Draught FL 25' 11" 28' 4"
    I'd say that if you really wanted to have a party, refiting an oil tanker would be best if you want big (just not as cool). (If anyone wants stats on modern carriers or oil tankers, google'em yourself.)
  6. Re:L. Bob Rife. on Buy Your Own Aircraft Carrier · · Score: 3, Funny

    "L. Bob Rife" who creates his own religion and navy? Neal Stephenson was lucky that $cientology didn't sue him for violating their IP.

  7. Minas Gerais ? on Buy Your Own Aircraft Carrier · · Score: 1

    I can't find that on my Middle Earth map.

  8. Re:Offshore computing center? on Buy Your Own Aircraft Carrier · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's big, but not that big:
    • Length: 693' 3" Overall 630' Waterline
    • 690' Flight deck
    • Beam: 80' 119' 6" Flight deck
    • Draught: 23' Fore 23' 5" aft
    • Complement: 1300 (1000 Navy, 300 Air)
    • Hanger: 322' long by 52' Width by 17' 6" height
  9. Re:No more bugs in IE! Yea! on IE6 SP1 Will Be Last Standalone Version · · Score: 1
    They won't be bugs in IE. Since it will be integrated into the OS, they will now be called bugs in Win XP (or whatever). :^)

    Ah well, it makes my final shift away from Windows all that much easier.

  10. Re:What nobody seems to be saying on DirecTV takes on PirateDen.com · · Score: 1
    Any ruling by an American court using the DMCA would be mainly a moot point. The only thing in reach of US courts is the Network Solutions domain registration. PirateDen should get a .ca domain or shift to a Canadian registrar.

    As for shutting down the site, their ISP is NISA, under Telus. Any action on that would have to be via Canadian courts or proving an AUP violation.

  11. Re:Is it illegal on DirecTV takes on PirateDen.com · · Score: 1

    Goofed that up. The missing word is conventions. But the ? link does look mysterious. :^)

  12. Re:Is it illegal on DirecTV takes on PirateDen.com · · Score: 1

    Don't mystery murder fans have ?

  13. Re:phhhthttt. on DirecTV takes on PirateDen.com · · Score: 1

    You obviously have no understanding of the laws of Canada, nor its current relationship with Great Britain (not England). I'd correct your mistakes, but why bother?

  14. Re:whois -h whois.networksolutions.com piratesden. on DirecTV takes on PirateDen.com · · Score: 1

    They should have gotten a .ca domain or at least used a Canadian registrar. Network Solutions could be pressured in an American court to transfer the domain.

  15. Re:phhhthttt. on DirecTV takes on PirateDen.com · · Score: 1
    The site itself is a circumvention device

    Keep in mind that there is no DMCA "circumvention device" provision in force in Canada.

  16. Re:WHAT DOES IT DO? on AOL Pulls Nullsoft's WASTE · · Score: 1
    Ignoring how this is going to be (probably already) used by some people is foolish. Also foolish to ignore how the RIAA is going to react to this.

    It would be a shame if the excellent legit uses of this type of product get caught in the legal crossfire, but it could happen (again). *bleh*

  17. 4. Profit! on AOL Pulls Nullsoft's WASTE · · Score: 1

    I wonder if there is a niche for packaging a Waste distro with easy install/maintainance tools, and providing support? (Dressed up especially for the corpo environment.) Not exactly another Red Hat, but who knows?

  18. Re:WHAT DOES IT DO? on AOL Pulls Nullsoft's WASTE · · Score: 1
    Which means that the RIAA couldn't easily snoop on what's being transfered. :^P

    I wonder if they had any plans to allow clustering of trusted Waste networks? Then the fat would truely be in the fire.

  19. Re:Whew on Department of Defense Gadget Show · · Score: 1
    All joking aside for a moment, I'd just like to say that I do admire and respect the people who do put on such gear to perform their duties.

    My sense tends towards the practical, and my humour, a bit dark. My immediate reaction was "They're wearing 40 lbs of sealed armour, they're facing something that may explode in their face, and they've got to be cautious and patient with it, but time is of the essence" My joke about Depends was relevant, I'd be facing a brown-trowsers event if was me.

    A stalute to them, and I hope the makers of such suits do think a cooling breeze for those tight moments.

  20. Re:Well... on Department of Defense Gadget Show · · Score: 2, Insightful
    expensive toilet seats

    Every time someone wants to get a news-op, they drag out how much it costs for something that you could buy at the local hardware store for much less.

    Guess what? Your local hardware stores probably aren't ISO-900x compliant. Their suppliers probably aren't. If some unauthorized cheap toilet seat pinches a general's butt, no one will be able to track back the supply and manufacturing trail to 2002/03/01, the 3rd shift, line 2 of PlastiButtCo, employee Al Kali.

    The price is expensive, but that's $5 for the toilet seat, $5,000+ for the time and paperwork. (Not that soft, triple-ply padding doesn't happen from time to time.) It's stupid, butt^h that's the system.

  21. Re:Who are they selling these to again? on Department of Defense Gadget Show · · Score: 1

    Better keep a watch on dem $cientologists den. They claim to be able to build sandbag walls for flood fighting. Hey, they wouldn't lie to people would they? (Other than that Red Cross claim.)

  22. Waltzing Matilda on Department of Defense Gadget Show · · Score: 5, Funny
    Those on display included MATILDA, built by Mesa Associates, which uses a robotic arm to investigate and detonate suspected bombs and packages.

    Couldn't they just mod an AIBO to do that job? Especially for the Bunker Buster job: Strap some C4 to it, "Woof! Woof! Time to die.. BOOM!" (Okay, I'm joking about the AIBO, but haven't we seen oodles of home robot Slashdot articles in the last couple of months that could probably do the job for less, and be controlled by a cell phone?)

  23. Re:Whew on Department of Defense Gadget Show · · Score: 4, Funny

    One thing they probably didn't add is air-conditioning. 40 lbs of sealed suit and other stuff as well? That's not "RoBoCop", that's "OverclockedCop" -- they need a case-mod.

  24. Re:not quite robo cop on Department of Defense Gadget Show · · Score: 5, Funny
    comes with a special undergarment

    Kevlar Depends for when something goes BANG in a big way?

  25. Re:Hmmm, spell it like the accountants do then? on SCO vs Linux.. Continued · · Score: 1
    Even better! ($)COX from their stock symbol. ($) describes their financial situation, the rest describes their attitude.

    Too bad that it's not really possible to change open code so that it's borken under SCO Unix. If they want to jack the open source community, it'd be nice to return the favour and exile them to their own little world. (Not that the planet they're on right now is very large.) Still, a FAQ of what borks under SCO Unix could be useful. (Didn't RMS withold new releases of EMACS at MIT over some snit-fit?)