Shouldn't it be the mathematician who answers “In an infinite amount of time.”, and the physicist who answers "never"? The mathematician may not care, but the physicist "knows" about the eventual entropy death of the universe, which, happening in finite time, will ensure it's actually never going to happen.
Yep, same here. Karma: Excellent, 15 moderator points expire 2017-03-16, and all notwithstanding. The checkbox has gone. Before it only occasionally unchecked itself.
With systemd you can enable/disable this with a easy setting on a per daemon basis and also define "only respawn X number of times during Y number of seconds"
Indeed. Like you can do with init. But let not get facts in your way of spreading systemd propaganda.
Doesn't matter that the mentioned people allegedly fell for your ads. It doesn't stop the irony of you advertising in a more obnoxious way than the ads your crapware is alledgedly getting rid of. You are a special sort of retarded to not realize that.
I'd assume that is because the cost to do so outweighs the gains. Rewiring a motor that's already performing as specified is both pointless and a major pain in the ass.
Adding a little hack to existing software? No problem at all.
People with a functioning brain don't expect software to be open source any more than they expect open-source cars, food, clothes, etc. Hell, pretty much all chip designs are closed source, as is pretty much all BIOS code - what's the point of being smug about a FOSS software stack if your hardware is proprietary?
Being able to change things you don't like, especially if you are a developer, duh. I've patched dozens of projects including my OS, userland and kernel. I wouldn't be able to do that on closed source software. I don't care about the philosophical bullshit your straw man is made of.
If, as a developer, it has never occured to you to modify your tooling, then there's something fundamentally wrong with you.
What does the source code of the JVM have to do with anything?
Well he said java would run the very same code "on many OS" so i wasn't entirely sure whether he's talking about java source (in which case those many OS are the one JVM) or the JVM itself (in which case he's wrong). That is the reason for the 'or' in my 'and/or'.
The platform is obviously the JVM
The JVM *is* the platform
and obviously has to be tuned to the specific hardware and OS [].
FTFY.
FWIW, I don't want any of this. I'm only tired of the "java runs anywhere" bullshit because pretty much the opposite is true.
Slashdot Mirror
Don't forget avahi, another brilliant masterpiece of software engineering. /s
No shit, Sherlock.
They might be right
therefore, they must be right.
That's the problem with your kind.
Spread your fantastikisms
I guess the irony is lost on you here.
I seek truth.
Well you seem to suck at it. Know what? You seek things you want to believe, and then you firmly believe them.
I do, and I don't care, and you should realize that not everything you can read on the www is necessarily true.
Oh wait, you're a holocaust denier. Obviously you do believe random shit you read on the www. How's the war on chemtrails going?
You really are a special sort of retarded.
Love from Germany.
Shouldn't it be the mathematician who answers “In an infinite amount of time.”, and the physicist who answers "never"?
The mathematician may not care, but the physicist "knows" about the eventual entropy death of the universe, which, happening in finite time, will ensure it's actually never going to happen.
I guess you also strongly disapprove of DNS?
if (ch->count >= MAXSPAWN) {
initlog(L_VB,
"Id \"%s\" respawning too fast: disabled for %d minutes",
ch->id, SLEEPTIME / 60);
That said, I'm not sure why/how you need pid matching for a process that crashed and hence does not have a pid anymore.
Now why would I want to do that?
Yep, same here.
Karma: Excellent, 15 moderator points expire 2017-03-16, and all notwithstanding. The checkbox has gone. Before it only occasionally unchecked itself.
With systemd you can enable/disable this with a easy setting on a per daemon basis and also define "only respawn X number of times during Y number of seconds"
Indeed. Like you can do with init. But let not get facts in your way of spreading systemd propaganda.
Obviously after a panic you have to boot, but that does not mean the problem is not going to be addressed.
There's a ton of old technology that needs reinventing.
Why?
What about replacing the current model of RAM/CPU/Disk/Network with something new?
What's wrong with "the current model of RAM/CPU/Disk/Network?" More importantly, what does Disk/Network have to do with RAM/CPU?
How about reinventing RAM? It's ancient.
Why? What's wrong with RAM?
Networking? Time for an overhaul.
WHY?
TCP/IP is like 50 years old.
So what?
You, Sir, are a special sort of retarded. And probably the kind of people that brought us systemd.
I'm no advertiser
Then what are your posts on /., if not ads? Maybe you need a little reality check?
I generally don't care about what advertisers think or say about me, so you might as well save yourself the trouble -- I'm not even reading your ads.
Doesn't matter that the mentioned people allegedly fell for your ads. It doesn't stop the irony of you advertising in a more obnoxious way than the ads your crapware is alledgedly getting rid of. You are a special sort of retarded to not realize that.
No.
Fuck you and your ads.
Outside of the US, most people prefer mayonaise with their fries.
True -- inside the US, most people prefer some fries with their bowl of mayonaise.
>2006
>vintage
By comparison, AMP pages' load in less than one second, on average.
AMP pages' what loads in less than one second?
I'd assume that is because the cost to do so outweighs the gains. Rewiring a motor that's already performing as specified is both pointless and a major pain in the ass.
Adding a little hack to existing software? No problem at all.
People with a functioning brain don't expect software to be open source any more than they expect open-source cars, food, clothes, etc. Hell, pretty much all chip designs are closed source, as is pretty much all BIOS code - what's the point of being smug about a FOSS software stack if your hardware is proprietary?
Being able to change things you don't like, especially if you are a developer, duh. I've patched dozens of projects including my OS, userland and kernel. I wouldn't be able to do that on closed source software. I don't care about the philosophical bullshit your straw man is made of.
If, as a developer, it has never occured to you to modify your tooling, then there's something fundamentally wrong with you.
What does the source code of the JVM have to do with anything?
Well he said java would run the very same code "on many OS" so i wasn't entirely sure whether he's talking about java source (in which case those many OS are the one JVM) or the JVM itself (in which case he's wrong). That is the reason for the 'or' in my 'and/or'.
The platform is obviously the JVM
The JVM *is* the platform
and obviously has to be tuned to the specific hardware and OS [].
FTFY.
FWIW, I don't want any of this. I'm only tired of the "java runs anywhere" bullshit because pretty much the opposite is true.