I like how you say something dumb, get called out for it, and then follow up with random statements completely unrelated to your original point... But i truly lost it at
If there is a failure of the "command channel" in the table, everything I said is correct.
(not only because it's complete nonsense) Please quit posting on/. forever. Thanks.
I never said you said that, but you mentioned it only in the context of programming. Besides, you ignore the entire rest of the response.. Pot, meet kettle.
The firmware is either stored on flash memory, or more recently, on the drive itself. Only a small bootloader is still in flash/rom of the controller
That sounds like a chicken-egg problem. If the drive can access the platters without firmware, what's the point of the firmware then? Or if the 'small bootloader' can actually access the platters, then what does it need to read the 'real thing' from the platters for?
Right, manufacturers typically spend a shitload of $ to engineer their own debug interface and the respective hardware for it when there's an established and well-designed open standard around.
Ehm, first of all, JTAG isn't only used for downloading firmware to your device, it's also a debugging interface and *very* widespread.
Second, you don't typically "disable" the JTAG interface on a released device -- what you do is set some "lock bits" or equivalent in the MCU, so the firmware cannot be read. No need to disable JTAG for that.
But sure, go on demonstrating how little you know about the matter... AC after all.
It’s not a proof of concept, or a scale model. It’s the real deal. "It’s not a test track," CEO Dirk Ahlborn says [...]
Instead, this first prototype will test and tweak practical elements like station setup, boarding procedures, and pod design. [...] It’s also a way to prove that yes, this thing can be built.
Way to contradict yourself... Twice. Emphasis mine.
Sure. Except there was no nitpicking. OP said/implied "Don't jump on a bike high, you might fail to balance it". Answer is: one of the least likely accidents following riding a bike high would be to (simply) tip over mid-ride due to not being able to balance it.
Next thing I know, you're nitpicking about how technically every action which directly or indirectly keeps a bike upright is "balancing". While true and pedantic in a lovely way, what you said is useless.
Slashdot Mirror
If I had up vote points, you would receive them.
FTFY
it's < and >.
Welcome to the 90s.
If there is a failure of the "command channel" in the table, everything I said is correct.
(not only because it's complete nonsense) /. forever. Thanks.
Please quit posting on
I never said you said that, but you mentioned it only in the context of programming.
Besides, you ignore the entire rest of the response.. Pot, meet kettle.
Was there a viable standard for this at that time?
The firmware is either stored on flash memory, or more recently, on the drive itself. Only a small bootloader is still in flash/rom of the controller
That sounds like a chicken-egg problem. If the drive can access the platters without firmware, what's the point of the firmware then? Or if the 'small bootloader' can actually access the platters, then what does it need to read the 'real thing' from the platters for?
Dear Mr. Low-ID, here's your Interwebs 101: Don't feed the trolls. That is, unless you're in for quality counter trolling.
Right, manufacturers typically spend a shitload of $ to engineer their own debug interface and the respective hardware for it when there's an established and well-designed open standard around.
Ehm, first of all, JTAG isn't only used for downloading firmware to your device, it's also a debugging interface and *very* widespread.
Second, you don't typically "disable" the JTAG interface on a released device -- what you do is set some "lock bits" or equivalent in the MCU, so the firmware cannot be read. No need to disable JTAG for that.
But sure, go on demonstrating how little you know about the matter... AC after all.
Nobody would question that Java code was portable
Really? Have they finally ported it to any platform other than the JVM?
It’s not a proof of concept, or a scale model. It’s the real deal. "It’s not a test track," CEO Dirk Ahlborn says [...]
Instead, this first prototype will test and tweak practical elements like station setup, boarding procedures, and pod design. [...] It’s also a way to prove that yes, this thing can be built.
Way to contradict yourself... Twice. Emphasis mine.
It compiled
Nifty
Yeah. Or a small business.
how about chess?
<)))><
I don't think I would want to be anywhere near that transmitter..
PS: even simpler, it should be fairly obvious that 2 GB in roughly 1 second gives a rate of ... well, roughly 2 GB/second, not 1 Tb/second..
1 Tbps = 1e12 bit/sec
2 GB = 8*2*2^30 = 2^34 bit
2^34/1e12 ~= 0.017 sec
Oh come on, how would that even work? It's one and the same person.
Sure. Except there was no nitpicking. OP said/implied "Don't jump on a bike high, you might fail to balance it". Answer is: one of the least likely accidents following riding a bike high would be to (simply) tip over mid-ride due to not being able to balance it.
Next thing I know, you're nitpicking about how technically every action which directly or indirectly keeps a bike upright is "balancing". While true and pedantic in a lovely way, what you said is useless.
Mh, the link should link to *CA, not *CD
It's called Sidewalk Sense Multiple Access Collision Avoidance
On your gateway, filter all traffic from and to your child's device except for a select number of domains which you do want to allow (the whitelist)
I'm guessing you have not a faint idea what this branch of the discussion originally was about.