Bud is very much an American lager, but you are criticizing it poorly; see, it isn't particularly hoppy, and it has a rather high alcohol content (for a mass market beer).
How so? Water usually freezes around 0 C, they managed to make it freeze at -7 C. That's the wrong direction if you are trying to figure out how to freeze hell.
As my post indicates, I am lazier than you. I would embed the video using flash and just provide a direct link for people that didn't want to mess with flash. I guess, I might use a video tag with just the h.264 and fallback to flash inside of it though. I wouldn't mess around encoding everything twice.
No. It isn't uncommon for software to have more than 1 defect per 10,000 lines though (my comment is 10 times higher than that, bot I was just following along with the big numbers).
The application asks you to list 5 restrictions or activities that you will commit to doing. They will pick people who list interesting things. They will not people who list sleeping, eating and drinking.
I've had it explained to me that it makes much more sense to build the metadata index on a powerful PC, rather than building the functionality into each mp3 player.
My $40 sandisk indexes a couple of gigabytes in about 10 seconds, so I scratched my head too.
I haven't been making it very well, but my point is pretty much that controlling the information insurance companies are allowed to use is a terrible way to socialize medical care costs. If the goal is to share the costs of care, we should just do that.
Once that is taken care of, we don't need to moralize about the content of contracts people choose to add on top.
(The current system leaves a lot of people out, it rewards cheaters, it amplifies the consequences of unemployment, etc., and it does all those things without having any apparent ability to actually be cost effective)
One reason I still read novels is that I find the quality to be far superior to most of the short stories and such available on the internet.
Your opinion may vary.
(and really, publishers aren't impoverishing anybody, they are opt-in (if they weren't opt-in, your cherished free content wouldn't exist). They are probably complicit in copyright protection being somewhat excessive, but so are the citizens who ignore the actions of their representatives)
It's only a problem if you insist on calling it insurance. And once you stop calling it insurance, the idea of making the cost sharing pool as large as possible becomes a little less offensive.
(and if the condition is actually insurable, rather than a guaranteed expense, is it really so offensive to charge the people who are actually part of that risk pool?)
Just imagine though, once an insurance company starts billing people for having certain genes, their competitors can advertise "We bill you based on the probability that you will need care in the future and the costs of that care, not by arbitrarily punishing you for having certain genes!"
I don't really have a problem with society working to offset the consequences of the genetic lottery, but it is just silly to call something insurance when it is purchased after the flood.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah, well, I was answering someone who called it soda water, which it really isn't, sorry you read something else into it.
Bud is very much an American lager, but you are criticizing it poorly; see, it isn't particularly hoppy, and it has a rather high alcohol content (for a mass market beer).
What I don't understand is how this manages to screw up Office.
How so? Water usually freezes around 0 C, they managed to make it freeze at -7 C. That's the wrong direction if you are trying to figure out how to freeze hell.
Unless they are doing each for separate reasons, rather than for the Glory of the Google.
As my post indicates, I am lazier than you. I would embed the video using flash and just provide a direct link for people that didn't want to mess with flash. I guess, I might use a video tag with just the h.264 and fallback to flash inside of it though. I wouldn't mess around encoding everything twice.
So, they have to serve h.264 inside of flash to support Internet Explorer, once that concession has been made, what's the point of the rest of it?
I guess if they want viewers to have access to the video they could provide a direct link to the file.
No. It isn't uncommon for software to have more than 1 defect per 10,000 lines though (my comment is 10 times higher than that, bot I was just following along with the big numbers).
On the other hand, that billion line program could have millions of errors and still be perfectly useful.
I was going to say something similar, cattle are among the most successful mammals on the planet.
The application asks you to list 5 restrictions or activities that you will commit to doing. They will pick people who list interesting things. They will not people who list sleeping, eating and drinking.
Well, except for the fact that they are selecting 4 people, and they aren't quite so likely to select people that have it easy.
Perhaps they got the Audi real cheap?
I guess I win by not having an expansion slot.
Have you experimented with different cards much?
I've had it explained to me that it makes much more sense to build the metadata index on a powerful PC, rather than building the functionality into each mp3 player.
My $40 sandisk indexes a couple of gigabytes in about 10 seconds, so I scratched my head too.
When he is around, he usually posts (at least) 2 root level comments to every story.
It sort of seems like spamming, but not quite. It is mostly just odd. I don't think it is driven by Apple lovin'.
You clicked through and made 2 root level comments. That doesn't speak to you trying to ignore it.
I haven't been making it very well, but my point is pretty much that controlling the information insurance companies are allowed to use is a terrible way to socialize medical care costs. If the goal is to share the costs of care, we should just do that.
Once that is taken care of, we don't need to moralize about the content of contracts people choose to add on top.
(The current system leaves a lot of people out, it rewards cheaters, it amplifies the consequences of unemployment, etc., and it does all those things without having any apparent ability to actually be cost effective)
Intel is a terrible example, they do most of their chip fabrication in the U.S, with much of the rest of it done in Ireland and Israel.
They say they do 75% of their chips in the U.S.:
http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/2009/20090210corp.htm
One reason I still read novels is that I find the quality to be far superior to most of the short stories and such available on the internet.
Your opinion may vary.
(and really, publishers aren't impoverishing anybody, they are opt-in (if they weren't opt-in, your cherished free content wouldn't exist). They are probably complicit in copyright protection being somewhat excessive, but so are the citizens who ignore the actions of their representatives)
It's only a problem if you insist on calling it insurance. And once you stop calling it insurance, the idea of making the cost sharing pool as large as possible becomes a little less offensive.
(and if the condition is actually insurable, rather than a guaranteed expense, is it really so offensive to charge the people who are actually part of that risk pool?)
Just imagine though, once an insurance company starts billing people for having certain genes, their competitors can advertise "We bill you based on the probability that you will need care in the future and the costs of that care, not by arbitrarily punishing you for having certain genes!"
I don't really have a problem with society working to offset the consequences of the genetic lottery, but it is just silly to call something insurance when it is purchased after the flood.
You really think it is inevitable that everyone will own a Kindle?
(I will concede that even the relatively small installed base of a million or two units probably makes up a noteworthy chunk of the book business)
You shouldn't be that upset, a key aspect of the book is that most people aren't paying attention.
$300:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16832116718
(That's for a full copy of the most expensive workstation edition, not an upgrade)
I suppose some fool payed $500 for it somewhere.