Slashdot Mirror


Israeli Scientists Freeze Water By Warming It

ccktech writes "As reported by NPR and Chemistry world, the journal Science has a paper by David Ehre, Etay Lavert, Meir Lahav, and Igor Lubomirsky [note: abstract online; payment required to read the full paper] of Israel's Weizmann Institute, who have figured out a way to freeze pure water by warming it up. The trick is that pure water has different freezing points depending on the electrical charge of the surface it resides on. They found out that a negatively charged surface causes water to freeze at a lower temperature than a positively charged surface. By putting water on the pyroelectric material Lithium Tantalate, which has a negative charge when cooler but a positive change when warmer; water would remain a liquid down to -17 degrees C., and then freeze when the substrate and water were warmed up and the charge changed to positive, where water freezes at -7 degrees C."

165 comments

  1. I could be stupid by PakProtector · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But I was expecting something along the lines of "Researchers manage to make water freeze at greater than 0C," instead of "Researchers manage to make water freeze below normal freezing temperature."

    Haven't they ever heard of salt? Or Anti-freeze?

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

    1. Re:I could be stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really the only interesting thing is that it's pure water.

    2. Re:I could be stupid by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      I would think the only interesting thing would be that this is (presumably) at standard pressure.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    3. Re:I could be stupid by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I thought pure water doesn't go solid, not until an impurity starts crystal formation that turns the water into a solid?

    4. Re:I could be stupid by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Informative

      Salt and anti-freeze just have typical freezing-point depression; there's no way to use them to produce a situation where water that is a stable liquid at one temperature will turn solid if you increase the temperature. The situation in this experiment is that water that's liquid at -17 C will freeze as you head it up towards -7 C.

    5. Re:I could be stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything freezes at some point. It's merely lower for pure water.

    6. Re:I could be stupid by Ardeaem · · Score: 4, Informative

      You missed the point. The neat thing is that water was liquid, and then they WARMED it, and it froze. It is just a gimmick, but it's not just that they managed to get it to freeze at a temperature below 0C. It's that, due to the interaction between temperature, charge, and the freezing point, they reversed the normal COLD-WARM SOLID-LIQUID order.

    7. Re:I could be stupid by ortholattice · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You missed the point. The neat thing is that water was liquid, and then they WARMED it, and it froze. [...] they reversed the normal COLD-WARM SOLID-LIQUID order.

      In this supercooled water experiment video, notice that the supercooled water freezes after the bottle is tapped. So energy is put into it, meaning that it is warmed up slightly. Isn't this also reversing the cold-warm solid-liquid order?

    8. Re:I could be stupid by selven · · Score: 1

      Making water freeze at >0'C is actually very easy. Just reduce the pressure

    9. Re:I could be stupid by Linzer · · Score: 5, Informative

      I thought pure water doesn't go solid, not until an impurity starts crystal formation that turns the water into a solid?

      In many cases, the surface of the container has defects which can play that role.

      --
      Gravitation is a theory, not a fact.
    10. Re:I could be stupid by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But it wasn't really a difference in the water, it was a difference in the container around the water. That is a well known phenomenon with airborn freezing temperature water, that it freezes on impact instead of while traveling through (clean) air.

    11. Re:I could be stupid by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    12. Re:I could be stupid by pj81381 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I thought pure water doesn't go solid, not until an impurity starts crystal formation that turns the water into a solid?

      This comment seems really unintuitive so I looked around a little. Ice can actually form entirely without crystallization, by cooling it to ~137 C in a matter of milliseconds. The article also mentions that "pure water, in the absence of any nucleating surface, can remain in a supercooled liquid state down to temperatures as low as -40C". I guess that means that pure water will begin crystallizing at this temperature anyway.

    13. Re:I could be stupid by sleeping143 · · Score: 1

      Except that the triple point is at about 0.01 C, so that's the warmest you can freeze water without turning to some novel method like these guys did. In fact, reducing the pressure from the triple point will get you a gas, not a solid.

    14. Re:I could be stupid by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      NO. You can also "reverse the cold-warm solid-liquid" order by changing the pressure. This is ridiculous. The title makes it sound like you can just warm up water and make it freeze. And people are actually arguing that it's amazing. The changed the temperature while simultaneously changing another variable. That's cheating.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    15. Re:I could be stupid by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, liquid water already contains quite a lot of tetrahedral "crystalline" structures floating around amongst the other molecules. So it really shouldn't need anything external to crystallize around... it already has some of its own.

    16. Re:I could be stupid by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Researchers manage to make water freeze at greater than 0C

      That's easy, all you need is a vacuum.

      It'll boil at the same time, but that can't be helped...

    17. Re:I could be stupid by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Exactly. They didn't JUST warm the water, they changed the surrounding conditions at the same time. While I wouldn't necessarily say it's "cheating" (because they weren't even trying to freeze the water by "just" warming it up), it certainly wasn't freezing water by warming it.

    18. Re:I could be stupid by biryokumaru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So that's why my car gets covered in an inch-thick sheet of perfectly clear ice. That's always bothered me, thanks!

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    19. Re:I could be stupid by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      You are correct about the humidity in the air, and how the most obvious effect of that (at least to those of us in colder climes) is the formation of black ice on the road... but I think the interesting part of this experiment isn't that they were able to cause the water to freeze by raising the temperature from -17'C to -7'C, it's how they were able to do it. Namely, that the freezing point of water changed based on the electric charge of the surface the water is on. Shouldn't really come as a surprise, as it's probably an effect of the way the electrons dance around the H2O molecule, but seeing it actually happen is interesting and may have applications to other substances than just water.

    20. Re:I could be stupid by ZosX · · Score: 1

      So you are saying that even in a "liquid" state, water has crystals that have formed? Fascinating. It truly amazes me how little we know about water and how we keep discovering new things about it. There are a lot of quacky people that think the homeopathic effect works, but if you ask me, it really sounds like pseudo-science. The placebo effect may actually be more powerful, so what does that say?

    21. Re:I could be stupid by Gibbs-Duhem · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly, this is well known, and is the difference between homogeneous nucleation caused by the massive undercooling providing the energy to nucleate ice spontaneously versus heterogeneous nucleation which requires much less free energy and occurs dependent on surfaces.

      It is not scientifically interesting that they warmed it to get it to freeze, that's just a comparison of freezing points... it's interesting that the charge of the surface modified the freezing/nucleation point. Frankly, I am amazed that this was published in Science; it seems like worthwhile research, but for a journal more like, say... applied physics letters or a more specific interest journal. Kudos to the researchers for managing to spin it as a general-interest paper when it is in fact a fairly simple observation of an obscure phenomena.

    22. Re:I could be stupid by raynet · · Score: 1

      Doesn't look very much like supercooled water. Atleast two details are missing. First, if it was supercooled, I would assume condensed water droplets on the surface of the bottle, or frost. Also, if it actually was frozen water, the bottle should expand as the ice takes up more volume than liquid water. It most likely is sodium acetate dissolved into water.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    23. Re:I could be stupid by Ihmhi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This could lead to a way to make ice cream without salt. They've managed to lower the freezing point of water without having to put any chemicals in the actual water itself.

    24. Re:I could be stupid by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      By "cheating" I meant it's cheating if the game you are playing is called "try to freeze water by warming it up." They just didn't do that.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    25. Re:I could be stupid by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Defects in the container can help it to freeze. It can also help to prevent superheated water in the microwave. I've come close to being burned by this effect.

      I remember one time when younger smashing the ice in a puddle with my foot while running and the water underneath making a cracking sound after a second. It was odd enough for me to stop and look. It had frozen solid in an instant. It had a odd pattern to it but I was more interested in getting to some place warm so I didn't really stay and examine it.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeWQ72X-YnM

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    26. Re:I could be stupid by Jurily · · Score: 1

      By "cheating" I meant it's cheating if the game you are playing is called "try to freeze water by warming it up." They just didn't do that.

      Except for the sensationalist headline that implied that they did, and won.

    27. Re:I could be stupid by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      LOL, and we've come full circle to the point of my original post.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    28. Re:I could be stupid by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Yeah but they introduced the electrical charge. That's what caused the freezing. They just didn't warm the water up enough to keep up with the change in freezing point. It's technical sleight of hand.

    29. Re:I could be stupid by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

      I realize that I'm ignoring lots of physical detail, but like others above I remain unimpressed by the ability to freeze water at 137 degrees below its freezing point. It won't help my radiator on a cold day, unfreeze my pipes or the walk outside, as those environments don't have the purity and perfection required to get away with this.

      Can someone offer an example of a useful application of the ability to freeze pure water at -137 degrees? Someone must have taken advantage of this property to do something interesting.

    30. Re:I could be stupid by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      you can replicate it yourself, leave a water bottle out in the garage when it's about 20 F out. take it inside and smack it against your hand, if the temperature is right you can watch the ice form. it works even better with non-carbonated flavored waters.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    31. Re:I could be stupid by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is recent research. I believe you can find the article on Ars Technica right now.

    32. Re:I could be stupid by EdIII · · Score: 1

      It had frozen solid in an instant. It had a odd pattern to it

      I had something like that happen to me. Most people I mention this to think I am bullshitting them. About 20 years ago I had put a filled plastic bottle of water in the freezer to take with me on a hike the next day. The next morning I opened the freezer and pulled out the water bottle. To my surprise, it was clear as glass. I was a little confused wondering if this was my bottle when my thumb made an indentation in the plastic. Within about 1/4 of a second the water crystallized in my hands and was no longer clear. Quite shocking at the time :)

      The most interesting part was the pattern that was created, which started from my thumb.

      Of course, the 'spookiest' part (which I understood much later) was that it was tap water. How on Earth it did not crystallize on its own is a complete mystery. It's not like it was pure by any definition of the word.

      Could try for another 20 years to replicate this event and would probably fail.

    33. Re:I could be stupid by BillX · · Score: 1

      Amen. This has nothing to do with changing the temperature of the water and everything to do with changing the charge on the container (which happens to be a function of temperature). It would be interesting to replicate this experiment on a piezoelectric rather than pyroelectric medium and force the water to phase change by deflecting one surface of the container a bit.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    34. Re:I could be stupid by BillX · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, and if you pull a certain amount of vacuum on it, you can get water to do all of boil, liquefy and freeze at the same temperature. This is even without applying mechanical energy or kinky fields (electrostatic or magnetic) to coerce its behavior.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    35. Re:I could be stupid by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      And a huge hurrdurr on my part, perhaps this could replace antifreeze in some way in the future through some sort of complex radiator system. -1 toxic chemical inside a car.

    36. Re:I could be stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they haven't. The water remains a liquid below zero because it is pure water, the impurities in normal water are what helps the ice crystals to form. This was well known before this experiment.

      I'm not really sure what practical uses this could have, right now it just seems like a neat trick in that they warm the water up and then it starts to freeze.

  2. Applications? by paskie · · Score: 3

    That does sound really cool, even as a fundamental research, but are there some cool real-world applications I'm not thinking of?

    --
    It's not the fall that kills you. It's the sudden stop at the end. -Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...some... sort of elaborate... water cleaning...thingymajig?

    2. Re:Applications? by kamochan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Apply that weird surface to generate the weird behaviour, and use it to power a Stirling engine.

    3. Re:Applications? by cntThnkofAname · · Score: 1

      are there some cool real-world applications I'm not thinking of?

      Seeing that the water was bellow freezing in both cases, you can bet on some cool application!

    4. Re:Applications? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      but are there some cool real-world applications I'm not thinking of?

      A pyroelectric lithium tantalate ice cube tray? In animal shapes?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Applications? by aBaldrich · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are scientists, not engineers.

      --
      In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
    6. Re:Applications? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      but are there some cool real-world applications I'm not thinking of?

      Cheaper cooling solutions for super computers than stuff like Flourinert, of course this could also makes for dirt-cheap AC units, refrigerators and so on.

      Just think...no more bulky compressors for cooling.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    7. Re:Applications? by iwaybandit · · Score: 1

      If a road surface can hold a negative charge, ice won't form above the charge-altered freezing point.

    8. Re:Applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds tantalizing! (Tantalicing?)

    9. Re:Applications? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      It's been quite a while since I've thought about "extreme" computer cooling solutions, but I thought Fluorinert was just a non-conductive liquid that otherwise was quite water-like. I used good old dollar-a-gallon distilled water in my old watercooling setup and that worked perfectly well.

      Of course skimming Wikipedia tells me that you can get some with very low boiling points, but you wouldn't usually use evaporative cooling for computers (I've seen it done, but it's impractical at best; downright dangerous in conjunction with very high-end equipment) and in any case the water used in computer liquid cooling systems usually only goes a few degrees above room temperature anyways (since it has a much higher heat density than air, it doesn't get as hot as traditional heatsinks do).

      I also fail to see how super-cooled water would help slim down AC units and other things of that nature... all they're doing is altering the freezing point of water, not magically sucking heat away in the process of warming it up.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    10. Re:Applications? by Krakadoom · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that engineering isn't a science? *ponder* Maybe you meant to say theorists?

    11. Re:Applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this would be my idea, make it push something. But does the energy input required to make this happen be greater than the original candle used to push a stirling engine?
      It seems to me that it might be method of storage, freezing in one condition to be in a different state in another.
      Especially if it remains liquid, frozen outside a fridge to move into and cool inside a fridge?

    12. Re:Applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Engineering is not a science, it is applied science.

    13. Re:Applications? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      In various parts of the world where you have unreliable power and a need for cooling, the ability to cool without massive draws is a huge benefit especially in the medical community. The other option is to use clay, but that can get messy after abit.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  3. Progress by brettz9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not quite Hell, but it's an impressive step in that direction...

    1. Re:Progress by maxume · · Score: 1

      How so? Water usually freezes around 0 C, they managed to make it freeze at -7 C. That's the wrong direction if you are trying to figure out how to freeze hell.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  4. Overflow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    By reading the title only, I thought the overflow-bug of water was finally found.

  5. Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So first they cool it to -17 degree and it remains a liquid, then they warm it up to -7 degree and it freezes. That's like traveling from Greenwich to the Arctic via Antarctica and then call it a scientific discovery that one can actually reach the Arctic by going south, right?

    1. Re:Let me get this straight by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So first they cool it to -17 degree and it remains a liquid, then they warm it up to -7 degree and it freezes. That's like traveling from Greenwich to the Arctic via Antarctica and then call it a scientific discovery that one can actually reach the Arctic by going south, right?

      No, it's more like the realization that Canada is south of Detroit.

    2. Re:Let me get this straight by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      No, it's more like the realization that Canada is south of Detroit.

      I need a global map with the lettering right side up.

    3. Re:Let me get this straight by X'16435934 · · Score: 0

      Alas, Canada isn't south of Detroit.
      I am in Canada, and am significantly North of Detroit.
      Perhaps Windsor is; Windsor may be PART of Canada... but they ain't "Canada".

      .

      --
      - Ecsad Essemal
      The Hexadecimal TV-REMOTE!
  6. Anti-freeze by ramsun · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it's feasible to coat this material on the inside of water pipes, to prevent them freezing in winter?

    1. Re:Anti-freeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it freezes at -7C.

    2. Re:Anti-freeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sure, but do you really want your water pipes freezing in the summer instead?

    3. Re:Anti-freeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and?

    4. Re:Anti-freeze by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I doubt you would want to coat your water pipes with Lithium Tantalate. First, tantalum is very expensive, and second (though this is only a wild guess) it could very easily be poisonous. Lithium can be pretty nasty stuff, and I don't know about tantalum.

    5. Re:Anti-freeze by jfengel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tantalum is non-toxic, but you know it doesn't really work like that. Sodium is explosive; chlorine is toxic; sodium chloride is tasty.

      Still, as you say, lithium tantalate is going to be far too expensive for coating pipes.

  7. Dowsing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    An Australian from Mitta Mitta who failed a dowsing test claimed that he only failed because the water was "electrically charged wrong".
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4694530584288972114

    1. Re:Dowsing by Smallpond · · Score: 4, Funny

      A dowser was working Down Under
      when his failure caused him to ponder
      "the charge on me watta
      was more than it oughta.
      So I couldn't tell lightning from thunder."

    2. Re:Dowsing by aquila.solo · · Score: 1

      Good on ya, mate.

  8. Israeli Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't remember the science story yesterday Physicists Discover How To Teleport Energy being called Japanese Physicists Discover How To Teleport Energy. Is the fact these scientists are Israeli title worthy?

    1. Re:Israeli Scientists by Spad · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously Chemists are more nationalistic than Physicists...

    2. Re:Israeli Scientists by aysa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't remember that stories about Italian/Japanese/German/British/French/Canadian scientists were ever questioned for mentioning the country of origin. Is the fact these scientists are Israeli disturbing you?

    3. Re:Israeli Scientists by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't find it particularly disturbing. I was pointing out the examples for the opposite reason--- to suggest that "[Nationality] Scientists" is not a particularly unusual phrase, contrary to the claims of the poster I was replying to.

    4. Re:Israeli Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real news is that they didn't change anyone for doing it.

    5. Re:Israeli Scientists by aysa · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sorry, you were pointing the facts correctly. I was addressing the AC parent, which was not only leaning towards hate speech, but also got a worrisome +4.

    6. Re:Israeli Scientists by Daemonax · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I remember something that I think I heard Chomsky saying, it might have been in response to one of those silly people that claim science is just like religion, and he mentioned something about the Nazi term Deutsche Physik and how that was silly, as when he reads a well written scientific paper he has no idea about the culture or religion of the author as science aims for objectiveness and tries to avoid subjectiveness. It shouldn't matter one bit who is doing the science, their name, country or ethnicity does not affect whether the science is correct or not.

      I couldn't help though, when seeing the title of thinking "Jewish scientists conspire to freeze water by warming, redefine black as white and turn the world upside down!".

      From the summary though anyway, what they've done sounds very interesting.

    7. Re:Israeli Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but also got a worrisome +4."

      I can't find the 'worrisome' option, and I have mod points at the moment.

    8. Re:Israeli Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wait until you see tommorow's story: American Slashdot Editors Add Superfluous Words When The Title is too Small.

    9. Re:Israeli Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was addressing the AC parent, which was not only leaning towards hate speech

      Leaning towards hate speech? Oh, come on, that's the stupidest thing I've heard today so far.

      Imagine for a moment, if you will, that it wasn't Israeli scientists but rather, say, Norwegian ones (just as an example). So there'd have been a headline saying "Norwegian scientists freeze water by warming it", and some AC (not me, I might add) asking whether it's really important that it was Norwegian scientists and why the headline was mentioning that specifically.

      Would you then say that this question was "leaning towards anti-Norwegian hate speech"? I doubt it, and here's why: it'd be total rubbish.

      Here's some advice for you: lay off the paranoia. Not everyone's out to get you, or the Israelis, and sometimes, a cigar is just a cigar and a question is just a question.

    10. Re:Israeli Scientists by Shohat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, we don't appreciate Apple products over here.

    11. Re:Israeli Scientists by justleavealonemmmkay · · Score: 1

      Call me back when you'll see "American scientist makes breakthrough in Stem Cell Research"

    12. Re:Israeli Scientists by jschen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Modded very funny, but with some element of truth. The grandest experiments in physics often require significant international collaborations and highly specialized instrumentation (think Large Hadron Collider) that demand large-scale pooling of resources. On the other hand, at least at this time, there really are no projects with such requirements in chemistry. Sure, there are many vibrant chemistry collaborations, but not nearly of that scope. So you can easily end up working only with people nearby, competing with a similarly capable team in another country (or in the same building). There are plenty of interesting problems in chemistry where a single person or a small group could produce a significant breakthrough through the creative design and execution of simple experiments using readily available equipment and chemicals.

    13. Re:Israeli Scientists by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      You really need to learn how to follow a comment thread...

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    14. Re:Israeli Scientists by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 1

      "but also got a worrisome +4."

      I can't find the 'worrisome' option, and I have mod points at the moment.

      lol, really.

      --
      Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
    15. Re:Israeli Scientists by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's confirmation bias, but I've seen this over and over in "Israeli X does Y" articles on slashdot (eg. Intel engineers coming out with a cool new chip). I've yet to see the complaint launched at Norwegians.

      Your hypothetical situation isn't parallel precisely because it didn't happen. If it did happen, then you have a point.

    16. Re:Israeli Scientists by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I was addressing the AC parent, which was not only leaning towards hate speech, but also got a worrisome +4.

      You're right. But the world has a lot of excellent reasons to be pissed off with Israel these days. I don't call it hate speech so much as, "Great. Those genocidal, media-owning psychopaths are pumping themselves up again," speech.

      Anti-Semitic? No. Anti-Israeli? Hell, yes! -And it may be nothing, tagging a scientific discovery with the "Israeli Scientist" label, but it's that camel's back thing. After enough vile awfulness, (a WALL around an entire society using false flag bombings as an excuse for a land-grab? Black market organ harvesting? Using guilt to manipulate the world reaction to clearly psychopathic acts? For goodness sake!), every little spot is going to cause a reaction.

      Sorry if that upsets you. Israel == Evil.

      -FL

    17. Re:Israeli Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You obviously forgot to mention the use of Christian little kids' blood to bake our Passover bread :)

      It seems to me we're not particularly good at black-market organ harvesting, considering the bunch of Israelis lying around waiting for transplants.

      Anyway, if you are true to your anti-Israeli cause, I'd recommend making sure you don't use any Israeli products. That includes, of course, intellectual-products, such as Intel Core2 chips, various medicines, economy models, and so forth.

      Good luck !

    18. Re:Israeli Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extremely intuitive of you to ask that question. I imagine it was intended to phish me out and see if I would make a comment. The Israelis picked the idea up -fairly likely in my opinion- from reading my website and posts. I mentioned numerous times how water placed in the freezer, one cup warm water and one cup normal temperature, that the warmer water freezes faster. That's because it is losing heat faster. I imagine it's a takeoff on Wind Chill. I'm one of Jehovah's Witnesses and the Jewish aren't overly excited about our beliefs. So whereas absolutely nobody here needed to know they were specifically JEWISH they are probably wanting to find out if I will see it despite perhaps many odds. hahahaha Beijing was all over my website last year and they learned much about the fluid dynamics of windmills. Moscow has picked up on what the others are doing so they're all over it this year so far. I'm not a "scientist"; I'm blessed with many insights into engine systems and energy. They aren't testing ME; they're testing to see if I have enough holy spirit given me they can't slip this by me. By my not writing down who I am in this response I'm throwing their little test back at em. Number 4 is alive y'all. You still have a little time remaining to jump ship. http://tinyurl.com/JehovahGodKingdomMsg1

    19. Re:Israeli Scientists by X'16435934 · · Score: 0

      Yes! YES! I knew it!

      Not only are they using christian babies' blood to freeze this water, but those damn Elders of Zion are now plotting to spray the stuff on nearby Palestinian Arabs, thus rendering them infertile and seize more of their land!
      Oh the humanity! ... Where are the Norwegians when we need them?

      --
      - Ecsad Essemal
      The Hexadecimal TV-REMOTE!
    20. Re:Israeli Scientists by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It seems to me we're not particularly good at black-market organ harvesting, considering the bunch of Israelis lying around waiting for transplants.

      Evil sells to the highest bidder and psychopathic governments are perfectly happy to abuse their own citizens as well as everybody else. But you know that. Denial is pathetic and you can only fool yourself. Others can and will see despite all tactics to the contrary. And deep down, you know that too.

      Anyway, if you are true to your anti-Israeli cause, I'd recommend making sure you don't use any Israeli products. That includes, of course, intellectual-products, such as Intel Core2 chips, various medicines, economy models, and so forth.

      It's not a moral/logical problem hindered by idiotic semantics. It's about applying economic pressure to a criminal state. Anybody interested in boycotting Israeli goods, it's easy to do. . .

      Check the barcode/UPC symbol. If it's made in Israel, the first three digits are "7 29". Here's a visual.

      Bye now, apologist. You should know better. Shame on you.

      -FL

    21. Re:Israeli Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no quarrel with you, Fantastic Lad.

      Just wanted to point out that rubbish such as organ harvesting isn't particularly new - unless you count switching from Christian kids to Palestinian Arabs as some kind of creativity.

      People, after all, believe what they want to believe. 700 years ago it was a little harder - a pastor had to work hard to convince his followers that their Jew neighbors are "organ harvesting vile psychopaths". Today it's enough to show a photo of a bunch of cow hearts and everyone goes berserk.

      And oh, of course, I "know that, deep down" (try to imagine the heavenly music that I play while typing this) - after all, I have just recently obtained an extra pair of testicles.

      As a side note - who is exactly this "government" you're talking about? I was sure it is democratically elected. And replaced every 2.5 years in average, by the way. So - unless everyone here is a psychopath (a wonderful word, by the way), eventually we will run out of psychopathic governments. Shame. Where will I get my extra eye-balls then.

      For some reason everyone ignores at least 8 years of rockets shot from the Gaza strip onto the (civilian) cities of Israel. The most recent rocket was shot today. I recently read that Hamas responded to the Goldstone report by saying they were aiming at military installations, and were just lacking the accuracy to not just miss and kill civilians. To that I have my own response - "oh, those testicles were yours! gosh, I was sure they were somebody else's".

      Finally, since *I* am also interested in your moral-welfare, I'd recommend also boycotting China, for a simple reason.
      Consider the population of the People's Republic of China - 1,338,612,968 (2010 estimate - Wikipedia). Consider the population
      of the so called Palestinian Arabs - let's upper bound it with 5,000,000 (could only find 1,500,202 in the Gaza strip). So, basically, if Chinese suffer more than ~0.37 percent of Palestinian's suffer, you're better off with boycotting PRC.

      It's also easy to boycott PRC - check the barcode/UPC symbol. If there is any - it's Chinese.

    22. Re:Israeli Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Answer got erased eh? Hit the old nerve I see. hehehehe Erasing my scriptural answer doesn't negate the content.

    23. Re:Israeli Scientists by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to point out that rubbish such as organ harvesting isn't particularly new - unless you count switching from Christian kids to Palestinian Arabs as some kind of creativity.

      People, after all, believe what they want to believe. 700 years ago it was a little harder - a pastor had to work hard to convince his followers that their Jew neighbors are "organ harvesting vile psychopaths". Today it's enough to show a photo of a bunch of cow hearts and everyone goes berserk.

      Cow hearts? Oh, stop it. I'm not talking about 700 year-old religious propaganda aimed at the poor, long-suffering Jews who must never be evaluated in the same light as any other war criminal, (because they're special!) I'm talking about Israel's chief pathologist being investigated for organ harvesting. And you know it.

      As a side note - who is exactly this "government" you're talking about? I was sure it is democratically elected. And replaced every 2.5 years in average, by the way. So - unless everyone here is a psychopath (a wonderful word, by the way), eventually we will run out of psychopathic governments. Shame. Where will I get my extra eye-balls then.

      Well, THAT was the lamest piece of 'logic' I've heard today. Congratulations. Are you telling me that "Democracy" prevents corruption? I think the grand experiment in America has proven that to be a completely false notion. And you know that too.

      For some reason everyone ignores at least 8 years of rockets shot from the Gaza strip onto the (civilian) cities of Israel. The most recent rocket was shot today. I recently read that Hamas responded to the Goldstone report by saying they were aiming at military installations, and were just lacking the accuracy to not just miss and kill civilians.

      The reason everybody ignores the 'rocket' attacks from the Gaza strip is that it's a pathetic excuse on many levels. The ones I find most compelling are the ones where the Mossad are implicated in bomb attacks on their own country.

      Finally, since *I* am also interested in your moral-welfare, I'd recommend also boycotting China, for a simple reason.
      Consider the population of the People's Republic of China - 1,338,612,968 (2010 estimate - Wikipedia). Consider the population
      of the so called Palestinian Arabs - let's upper bound it with 5,000,000 (could only find 1,500,202 in the Gaza strip). So, basically, if Chinese suffer more than ~0.37 percent of Palestinian's suffer, you're better off with boycotting PRC.

      That's a sick and twisted argument to excuse not just Israeli violence, but violence of any kind. "Well, THEY'RE doing it!" I sincerely hope you're joking. (Though given your apparent desire to excuse and smooth over Israeli genocidal tendencies, I think you ARE both joking and not getting why it's sick. Dissected any cats when you were small?).

      -FL

  9. Nothing new I have noticed this with my beer ;-)) by ls671 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I put a beer in the freezer too long but not that long, when I take it out of the freezer, I can see it is pretty 100% liquid inside the bottle. Now, taking it out of the freezer makes it warmer and opening it even warmer due to air circulation inside the bottle.

    Well, when I open it, it turns to ice so I make my beer freeze by making it warmer so nothing new here ;--))))

    Very seriously, I swear this is true but I understand it could be due to other factors that the ones described in TFA like pressure inside the bottle but I thought it would interesting to mention anyway.

    Haven't anybody else seen their beer freeze in their hand while opening it just after it has been in the freezer although it was in a liquid state when they actually took it out of the freezer ?

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  10. Re:Nothing new I have noticed this with my beer ;- by spydum · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's an old bar trick. It has to do with the co2 being released on pressure change. Nothing like the science these folks have described.

  11. Serious Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can tell they're real scientists because they have their own Igor.

  12. That's nothing. by Timosch · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of these guys managed to turn water into wine 2000 years ago...

    1. Re:That's nothing. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Was that before or after walking on it? Yuck.

    2. Re:That's nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I take it you've never seen how wine is made. Those grapes have to get pressed somehow.

    3. Re:That's nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Israelis have a long tradition of chemically altering water. You would think a desert people would be more careful with such a scarce resource.

    4. Re:That's nothing. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Pressing grapes (with our without feet) is still not the same as walking on them.

    5. Re:That's nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of these guys managed to turn water into wine 2000 years ago...

      And was later on tortured and killed by his own kind for not conforming to the established truths of their order.

      (... Bracing for ADL shitstorm.)

    6. Re:That's nothing. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      True, but He never published the details of how He did it.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  13. Ah, I see you are an american by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Funny

    You clearly must be an American, since you compare beer to water. Over here in the old world, we know there is a difference by the taste for one.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Ah, I see you are an american by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      My first thought on reading the GP was "will this work with bottled real ale, or is it just hops-flavoured soda water like Budweiser?"

    2. Re:Ah, I see you are an american by maxume · · Score: 1

      Bud is very much an American lager, but you are criticizing it poorly; see, it isn't particularly hoppy, and it has a rather high alcohol content (for a mass market beer).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Ah, I see you are an american by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, your typical Budweiser is roughly around 3.4% alcohol by volume, which is quite weak. In the days before and during Prohibition it would have been scoffed at and called "Near Beer", made for kids. But it is that way today because of post-Prohibition laws that restricted beer to lower alcohol levels. In some states that is. For some reason around 3.3-3.4% was a fairly common level when it came to such laws.

      My state used to have some weird laws carried over from those days. They have changed somewhat since. But until pretty recently, (1) it was illegal to show alcohol content on bottles, cans, or their packaging. (2) Beer bought in regular stores was limited to 3.4% alcohol by volume. But you could get beer or ale of higher alcohol content at a state liquor store.

      That led to some strange situations. For example, you could get Rainier Ale in the store, at 3.4%, and at the liquor store at about 9% if I remember. But because of the law, there was no indication of strength on the cans, which all had identical green and gold printing. So people made some pretty major mistakes now and then.

      Fortunately the laws here have become somewhat more reasonable, but a typical domestic mass-produced lager in most of the U.S. is still usually around 3.4%. It's getting better, though, with all the smaller breweries that have started up.

    4. Re:Ah, I see you are an american by maxume · · Score: 1

      No, it is 5% except in locations where 3.2% is legally mandated.

      This seems reliable enough:

      http://www.beer100.com/beercalories.htm

      And it led me here:

      http://nutritional.anheuser-busch.com/

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Ah, I see you are an american by Dragoniz3r · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not only is it not particularly hoppy, it has a pretty significant rice content. If anything, bud is hop-flavored rice alcohol. This being said, it's still my favorite mass market beer.

    6. Re:Ah, I see you are an american by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not only is it not particularly hoppy, it has a pretty significant rice content. If anything, bud is hop-flavored rice alcohol. This being said, it's still my favorite mass market beer.

      Yes, we live in a cultural backwater as far as beer is concerned. In Mexico the cheap regular beer is some of the best on the planet.

      --
      Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
    7. Re:Ah, I see you are an american by Gerafix · · Score: 1

      He can't be American because we all know that American beer is more like piss than water. Perhaps this is one article where Frosty Piss is on topic.

    8. Re:Ah, I see you are an american by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      All I can tell you is that this state no longer regulates the percentage, but Budweiser and many other bulk process lagers in the stores here are still in the 3.3% to 3.5% range (not 3.2). And that is easy enough to tell because the law no longer prohibits display of the alcohol content. Some are marked on the containers, and some (though few) stores mark it on the shelves.

    9. Re:Ah, I see you are an american by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Just to be clear: in contrast, on the next shelf over I can get imports or microbrews (and a few domestic mass-produced ales) in the 7%-10% range.

    10. Re:Ah, I see you are an american by maxume · · Score: 1

      The can I am presently drinking, purchased in Michigan, says 5%.

      It may be the case that you are subject to county, rather than state, regulation.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:Ah, I see you are an american by X'16435934 · · Score: 0

      Old joke (at least in Canada)

      Why is is American beer like making love in a canoe?
      (this joke must be Canadian- it has a "canoe" in it)

      wait...
      ....
      --
      because...
      uhh..

      Because its FUCKING NEAR WATER!

      Ta daaa!

      --
      - Ecsad Essemal
      The Hexadecimal TV-REMOTE!
    12. Re:Ah, I see you are an american by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      No, there is no county regulation. If there were, I still couldn't reach 2 feet further down and pull a 7% or 10% beer off the shelf.

      The fact is that most (but by no means all) mass-produced beers in stores in my state are still in the 3%+ range, although no law requires them to be. I do not know why that is; I admit that I simply assumed that those mass-produced beers basically just distributed beer of those percentages.

      I admit that there is something of a puzzle here. But I assure you that it is not a matter of law. There are also mass-produced beers of as much as 12% in the same coolers.

    13. Re:Ah, I see you are an american by maxume · · Score: 1

      It's a bit of a stretch, but it could be that the distributor that supplies the stores you frequent also serves a regulated county.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  14. So that's Frozone's trick! by wisebabo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He must be negatively charged (thus keeping water a liquid on or in him) and then the moment he "releases" it, it freezes!

    Could there be some sort of industrial application for this, like ice-making where you have a jet of "liquid" water (because it is kept in a negatively charged apparatus) but upon contact with something, loses its charge and freezes? How about rapid construction of ice sculptures? Just like spray on concrete.

    I even seem to remember someone in WWII proposing making giant pontoons/floating islands out of ice and hay.

    How about in Antarctica/on Mars using it for rapid construction of ice domes? Once it solidifies it won't melt.

    1. Re:So that's Frozone's trick! by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      How about in Antarctica/on Mars using it for rapid construction of ice domes? Once it solidifies it won't melt.

      I dunno about Antarctica but I think sublimation would be a problem on Mars.

    2. Re:So that's Frozone's trick! by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 2, Informative

      There has been quite a bit of work put into different 'icecretes', as a matter of fact. Here are a few examples, although I'm sure there's more that I'm not even aware of:

      http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/31-70/Ch6.htm
      Skip down to para 6-8.c and 6-10.b

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pykrete and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Habakkuk

      http://pisces.hilo.hawaii.edu/documents/VT-NIA-PISCESFinalReport.pdf
      A *very* interesting paper on using lunar regolith icecrete for construction (among other topics)

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    3. Re:So that's Frozone's trick! by JDevers · · Score: 1

      That's why you apply a "top coat" of some sort of plastic to the ice once formed. Of course, all that ice sculpture does is protect one from an environment that is very cold but not very conductive and so easily protected against. It also would do nothing to maintain pressure inside the "bubble". Probably easier to just use plastic in the first place...

  15. How? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    This is going to make a better Martini how, exactly?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  16. This is cool... by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

    and warm at the same time... Being capable of controlling freezing point of water with an electric field could have very interesting applications in automotive and building industry.

  17. Using expansion of ice to generate power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.allexperts.com/q/Physics-1358/2008/7/Using-expansion-ice-generate.htm
    this model: ICE 0 WATER

    if i understood the above explanation:
    model using Lithium Tantalate: ICE -17 WATER -7 ICE 0 WATER

  18. Contrary to what kids think by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Good beer is NOT about the amount of alcohol, it is about the flavor. If it has low alcohol, you just can drink more of it. Granted, the better tasting beers tend to have high alcohol content, but I am sure that is just a coincidence. As is the fact that my new driving license has "revoked" pre-stamped across it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Contrary to what kids think by maxume · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, I was answering someone who called it soda water, which it really isn't, sorry you read something else into it.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Contrary to what kids think by realityimpaired · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think he was referring to the fact that it tastes like fizzy water with beer-like flavour, not the alcohol content. And Budweiser tastes pretty darned watery, even compared against other beers of the same type. Ales usually have a heavier taste to them, so it's not really fair to compare Budweiser against something like Guiness or Caledonian in terms of flavour. It is, however, fair to compare it against a good lager like Pilsner Urquell. Even when you compare it against a shitty lager, like Labatt Blue (which is also a pilsner, like Budweiser), Budweiser comes out on the bottom.

      (and no, I'm not saying that Canadian beer sucks, just that some of the most popular Canadian beers suck. Namely, Labatt and Molson. If you want a good Canadian beer, try something like Steam Whistle, or Wellington. We don't export the good stuff. Similarly, I think the Australians are smart enough to export the shitty beers and keep the good stuff for themselves, as are the Dutch... think about that when you order a Fosters or a Heineken.)

    3. Re:Contrary to what kids think by maxume · · Score: 1

      It may be the case that I misinterpreted soda water, but it isn't unreasonable for me to point out that 'alcohol is teh awesome' was not the context of my comment, especially when the comment came with the 'Contrary to what kids think' bullshit.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  19. Moses out of Egypt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The discoverers being jewish boffins, I wish to ask if this pyro-electric trick can be used to divide the Red Sea by high-teparature freezing, so that it can be passed on dry land by barefoot, chariots, battle tanks and re-flooded on whim?

  20. Opposite still working? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Turning ice into water by cooling it?

    In any direction, changing state (or prevent that change) not using plain heat, but just charging electrically could make some applications more energy efficient.

  21. big deal by pydev · · Score: 1

    Supercooled water will freeze with just about any trigger. The precise mechanism of this is kind of neat, but as an effect, it's not terribly surprising.

  22. Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Maybe this will be the thing that proves global warming a myth. If you warm water, and it still freezes, we'll still have icebergs and no massive coastal flooding. Right?

    Posted anonymously because someone isn't going to take this as a joke.

    1. Re:Global Warming by TheBilgeRat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      HARBL HARBL HARBL HARBL!!!! Glenn Beck loving global warming naysayer! HARBL HARBL... I got nuttin.

  23. Re:Nothing new I have noticed this with my beer ;- by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

    Yes, I have. I consider it one of the crowning achievements of my life. Beer at -4 degrees C is a wonderful, wonderful thing in an Australian summer.

    Testing with a digital thermometer was fun too. If the beer was too cold, dipping the tip of the probe into the beer is enough to start a cascade of freezing that blooms down through the whole bottle in about a second. Interesting phenomena to observe. But a waste of beer.

    With practice, I got the method worked out. Slow and careful is the key. Higher alcohol beers work better.

  24. What, no Mr.Freeze tag on this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You could make one heck of a freeze gun with this technology... spray things and they freeze

  25. Are they calling it Ice-Nine? by ibirman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmm, water ice that is stable at a higher temperature than liquid water? Can anyone say ice-9?

  26. Re:Nothing new I have noticed this with my beer ;- by blueg3 · · Score: 1

    Yes, but it's due to the pressure changes and release of dissolved CO2. :-)

  27. Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the field the water is in is certainly going to alter the internal structure. I'd be surprised if this extended into the bulk liquid. Otherwise water near electric cables would be notorious for odd freezing.

    More likely whatever phase change the lithium tantalate went through to cause a charge change. Will also cause surface effects and irregularities for nucleation. Or visa versa.

    In any case this is just a short range effect and won't be useable. Beyond the distance the field persists.

  28. Title is completely wrong, sorry but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The water doesn't freeze because it's warmed up.
    The water DOESN'T freeze because of a negative electrical charge.

    Of course, since it's below it's freezing point, once the negative electrical charge is removed, it freezes.
    The fact that the substrate providing the negative charge changes to a positive charge at about -7 C and thus stops preventing the water from freezing is important to know, but doesn't change physics.

    Why has Slashdot been getting so many bad/wrong headlines of late?

    1. Re:Title is completely wrong, sorry but... by FlyingGuy · · Score: 1

      They are all taking lessons from KDawson?

      --
      Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
  29. Re:Nothing new I have noticed this with my beer ;- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If "nothing like" means "not in a bar"...... then yes, nothing like that.

  30. Re:Nothing new I have noticed this with my beer ;- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's an old bar trick. It has to do with the co2 being released on pressure change. Nothing like the science these folks have described.

    That's simply the enthalpy dropping as the CO2 expands and escapes the bottle. It's like how some aerosol can gets cold to the touch if you keep spraying for more than a few seconds, that expanding gas takes quite a lot of energy along with it.

  31. Whut? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It sounds like it freezes due to the change in charge, not because the water warms up. It's freezing in *spite* of the water warming. It's like they are just chasing the freezing point around.

    You get the same effect when opening a highly chilled bottle of soda. It starts to freeze due to the release of carbonation, although the pressure change might come into play as well.

    1. Re:Whut? by Homburg · · Score: 1

      It sounds like it freezes due to the change in charge, not because the water warms up.

      But when the water warms up, that causes the charge on the surface to change, thereby causing the water to freeze; so the water warming up, and it freezing, are causally linked. It seems more like a neat trick than anything else, but "freeze water by warming it" is a more-or-less accurate summary of what's happening.

  32. Re:Nothing new I have noticed this with my beer ;- by nedlohs · · Score: 2, Informative

    When you open it COs is released this causes the pressure to fall.

            pV = nRT

    So you did in fact cool it by opening it.

    You could also supercool it I guess and shaking it a little when taking it out causes it to crystallize - but I'm having doubts about beer and beer bottles being pure enough to not crystallize out in the first place.

  33. My wife does something similar by davidannis · · Score: 1

    when she saves me money by spending it.

  34. Heat of melting/fusion by PPH · · Score: 1

    So, does water absorb/release 334 kJ/kg when it thaws/freezes due to this change in charge? If so, we may have some interesting applications in the area of refrigeration, heat engines, etc.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  35. Dumbfucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will some of you Eurofags explain to me why this water isn't freezing at 0 degrees C? I thought you faggots had the more "logical" system?

  36. Re:Contrary to what kids drink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good beer is NOT about the amount of alcohol, it is about the flavor.

    Correction: Good beer is an oxymoron.

    Beer is for kids (i.e. legal minimum age wherever you live through age 30).

    You might be a redneck if you think beer tastes good.

    You might be a redneck if you're over 30 and you still drink beer.

  37. Basic chemistry continues to amaze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can change the freezing temperature of water by adding something else to it in solution? Before TFA I would have never guessed that was possible (Bangs head on table)

  38. More to the point: by Gription · · Score: 2

    Water needs to reach the correct temperature and then have something trigger the phase transition.

    In other words:
    The crystallization has to start somewhere. Imperfections in the surface or impurities supply this. If you have very pure water and a "perfect" container, the lack of a starting point for crystallization can delay the phase transition by quite a bit.
    (Then you get YouTube videos showing flash freezing of water bottles!/i))

    1. Re:More to the point: by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Let me get this right. Are you saying that a sphere of pure water floating in space will not freeze until there is an external catalyst involved?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:More to the point: by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      I think so.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  39. Re:Nothing new I have noticed this with my beer ;- by ls671 · · Score: 1

    Sure, I hinted about this in my post...

    But you still just gave me a great idea: I will design a beer based air conditioner ( air cooler ) and sell it/publish it on sites similar to engadget ;-)))

    Put in 4 cases of 24 and have some mechanism opening them one by one coupled with a fan and I am done ;-)

    First on my list: Buy 4 cases of 24...
    half an hour later:
    Done...
    one hour later:
    Second on the list: Funny, I don't remember now...

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  40. Why? by ascari · · Score: 1

    So in summary: It's interesting that the polarity of the charge of a container drastically affects the freezing point. It's quite a bit less interesting that by using a fancy container which alters its charge you can get water to freeze when it's warmed. (That's a bit more like a parlor trick though - it's not really the warming that's the point, it's the change of charge.)

    What would be really interesting to know is WHY this happens, i.e. the underlying physics that casue this effect. Also, is this phenomenon isolated to water or are there other liquids with similar properies?

  41. Re:Nothing new I have noticed this with my beer ;- by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    Do you know how air is liquefied and then separated into N2 and O2?

  42. Re:I could be stupid -PROFIT! by X'16435934 · · Score: 0

    1. Find a way to freeze water at a REALLY LOW temp.
    2. Write a research paper on it.
    ...
    3. TENURE!
    and of course prophet...

    --
    - Ecsad Essemal
    The Hexadecimal TV-REMOTE!
  43. Re:I could be stupid about "pure" water by X'16435934 · · Score: 0

    it was tap water. How on Earth it did not crystallize on its own is a complete mystery. It's not like it was pure by any definition of the word.

    OMG... Are these "bottled water" acolytes still running around?
    Why should tap water (from a large municipality, or even a well managed smaller one) not be pure?
    OK so it has some chlorine ions in it. So?
    This is not particulate matter, such as you might find in a stream or in a well.
    Grrrr.... you brainwashed plastic bottle people are what's wrong with this society...

    --
    - Ecsad Essemal
    The Hexadecimal TV-REMOTE!
  44. Re:Nothing new I have noticed this with my beer ;- by BillX · · Score: 1

    I've also seen this happen with regularity - at work we sometimes crack a beer after hours, my boss likes to keep his cube fridge hell-frozen-overishly cold. So perfectly liquid beers (can or bottle) from the top shelf often freeze within 20 seconds after opening. He swears by the belief that giving the can a good hard squeeze for several seconds prior to opening reduces the chance of it freezing, but nobody has yet come up with a believable theory as to why that would be. Guesses so far are that the applying of warm hands boosts the temperature just enough, or that the final squeeze helps compress any stray bubbles back into solution and thus eliminate possible nucleation points. Personally, I'm just amused to keep mine a bit warmer and watch a handful of MS and PhDs arguing over why their beer freezes.

    --
    Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  45. Re:Nothing new I have noticed this with my beer ;- by PeterAitch · · Score: 1

    First of all, you wouldn't put REAL beer in a freezer. You must mean what we in the UK call "lager".

    Some highly filtered lagers and "lite" beers can readily be supercooled in a freezer. When removed, they have not solidified since there are no nucleation sites available to them. When opened, the CO2 bubbles will act as nucleation sites and freezing will occur rapidly, producing dendrites of ice in all directions. The same effect can be initiated by tapping the unopened bottle SHARPLY (without breaking it!) on a convenient surface. It's a handy party trick: offer a supercooled lager to someone you don't like and watch them [not] drink it.

  46. sodium acetate by drkim · · Score: 1

    This is similar to the what happens with sodium acetate (used in re-usable hand warmers and such) which can't 'remember' how to crystallize until provided with a seed (the button trigger in a warmer) and then gives off heat as it crystallizes.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_acetate#Heating_pad