Sure. I was pointing out that there is a difference between 9 years with no updates and 9 years (or 7 going strictly by what I said) with significant updates.
You pay for the ISP that has a legal department that spends money trying to block warrants.
I'll just encrypt sensitive information before it leaves my damn computer (please note that I do not expect to send any 'sensitive' information from my personal computer anytime in the next 5 years).
As far as the tax receipts, it wouldn't be that hard to find something to do with the money (pay off debt is an easy one), the only hard part would be agreeing on where to spend it (and that's only a problem because our politics are ridiculous).
Oh, really? Off the top of my head I can think of three completely sensible ways to spend the money to directly offset the social cost of pollution. FWIW, paying off debt is not one of those ways.
What does this mean? Your "Oh, really?" makes no sense to me as a response to what I said.
Did they model China and India as a free for all (a tax can be applied to imports, and perhaps, rebated against exports)?
As far as the tax receipts, it wouldn't be that hard to find something to do with the money (pay off debt is an easy one), the only hard part would be agreeing on where to spend it (and that's only a problem because our politics are ridiculous).
It really isn't obvious that CO2 reduction and capture is anywhere as easy as sulfur reduction apparently was.
(it is arguable that the sulfur reductions simply demonstrated that the producers could easily bear increased regulatory requirements, there wasn't really any sort of active market)
So does a tax (except instead of issuing a certain number of certificates in order to achieve a given output, the rate is adjusted up or down (but probably only ever up...)).
It is 5 dangerous. As long as they put in some boilerplate, I doubt there will really be any way to hold them responsible when some doofus wires his brain to a car battery.
Not to mention that there are already people doing similar stuff to real live patients.
Considering that they are compiling/translating PHP code into C++ code and then compiling that code, I don't think the speed of their C++ compiler was a major contributor to the choice.
Slashdot Mirror
Sure. I was pointing out that there is a difference between 9 years with no updates and 9 years (or 7 going strictly by what I said) with significant updates.
GP stated that XP is 9 years old. XP SP3 is less than 2 years old.
My point being that there is significant ongoing maintenance, so the software isn't quite entirely 9 years old.
You pay for the ISP that has a legal department that spends money trying to block warrants.
I'll just encrypt sensitive information before it leaves my damn computer (please note that I do not expect to send any 'sensitive' information from my personal computer anytime in the next 5 years).
You could just try to hit two targets in 5 seconds or something (starting with the gun in whatever position the range allows).
On XP, cookies are stored in "C:\Documents and Settings\xxxxx\Cookies", so if the path to a cookie can be read, xxxxx is pretty trivial to determine.
It isn't completely unreasonable to start that clock at the release of the most recent service pack.
IT WAS TIM BERNERS-LEE!
Every modern OS that runs on an x86 runs in protected mode.
But this is something else (A sandbox present in Vista and later versions of Windows).
So go ahead and incorporate, the fee is usually nominal (though the tax implications may not be to your liking).
It is probably going to plod along for a couple of years and then come to a preachy, dissatisfying end.
The free antivirus packages are fine, there is no need to pay for one.
This isn't the patent office insisting on professionalism, it is the patent office insisting on bureaucratic nonsense.
Have you looked at biology lately?
As far as the tax receipts, it wouldn't be that hard to find something to do with the money (pay off debt is an easy one), the only hard part would be agreeing on where to spend it (and that's only a problem because our politics are ridiculous).
Oh, really? Off the top of my head I can think of three completely sensible ways to spend the money to directly offset the social cost of pollution. FWIW, paying off debt is not one of those ways.
What does this mean? Your "Oh, really?" makes no sense to me as a response to what I said.
You are ranting about free markets. Cap and trade is the government using a market to help put a value on regulatory certificates. It is a market.
Which economists? All of them?
Did they model China and India as a free for all (a tax can be applied to imports, and perhaps, rebated against exports)?
As far as the tax receipts, it wouldn't be that hard to find something to do with the money (pay off debt is an easy one), the only hard part would be agreeing on where to spend it (and that's only a problem because our politics are ridiculous).
It really isn't obvious that CO2 reduction and capture is anywhere as easy as sulfur reduction apparently was.
(it is arguable that the sulfur reductions simply demonstrated that the producers could easily bear increased regulatory requirements, there wasn't really any sort of active market)
So does a tax (except instead of issuing a certain number of certificates in order to achieve a given output, the rate is adjusted up or down (but probably only ever up...)).
It is 5 dangerous. As long as they put in some boilerplate, I doubt there will really be any way to hold them responsible when some doofus wires his brain to a car battery.
Not to mention that there are already people doing similar stuff to real live patients.
I bet it was trollish lies.
The title of the linked comic is "Spinal Tap Amps".
Your rich and vivid imagination is going to get your ass kicked.
The good news is that it is almost inevitable, and in the case that you don't get older, you won't notice.
When you are 1 year old, your entire life memory is like a day or a week.
Considering that they are compiling/translating PHP code into C++ code and then compiling that code, I don't think the speed of their C++ compiler was a major contributor to the choice.