Defaulting on the Chinese debt would put all of the rest of the U.S. debt into question; this could make if difficult to receive oil in exchange for paper (at the very least, Saudi Arabia and other petroleum funded societies would want to continue to trade with the U.S., but they almost certainly wouldn't do it in dollars anymore).
The linked bug was not hidden, it wasn't identified as a security issue (it was eventually identified as a duplicate of the bug that was fixed this week, but it was open for months; if you dig in, you will see that Mozilla is examining their processes a bit because of this).
but only as pdf, I am talking about Chapter 8; skimming it a little bit indicates that the above statement continues to hold.)
I'm not qualified enough to pretend to have an opinion on the accuracy of the reports or the likelihood of significant anthropogenic climate change, but I get an uneasy feeling when I compare the apparent confidence of the scientists and the apparent confidence of a lot of advocates.
The previous structure gave him near total control of the company and much of the bank debt would become more expensive if he gave up that control. Presumably, his bonds and preferred stock are what gave him that equity, I can't imagine that any of his regular shared survived the deal.
As far as rain forests, Brazilian ethanol comes from cane which basically won't grow on the soil present in most of the rain forests. The rain forests are being destroyed by (mostly) illegal logging and subsistence farmers who come in and burn the land (the farmers only get a year or two of crops out of the soil before it isn't worth farming, then they move on to an area that has recently been logged...).
They are being pragmatic. There would be far less apps if they made developers pay for everything (which might be good for iPhone users, as the typical app might end up being higher quality, but Apple makes money on volume here).
Virtual machines (perhaps inside of virtual machines inside of virtual machines) will keep you working up until a 'bit' loses meaning.
Though I would bet that in 100 years there are widely available apps that can read ascii text, unicode text, pdf, doc, odf, and so on (if only for use by legal researchers and government archivists...).
That link doesn't make your point at all; 1 of the examples is 'people today find it cheesy as hell' (the drunks watching Shakespeare back in the day probably thought so too, they just happened to be drunk, so it was good for a laugh) and the second is 'they don't talk about the vagina innuendo in school' which doesn't have much to do with lacking context (the innuendo isn't particularly obscure). I also doubt that the feign/fain distinction was noticed all that often by typical contemporary viewers (but this is rank speculation on my part), so it is hard to attribute this to the erosion of context.
The implication in the summary (which, according to several posters above, is wrong) is that Apple is charging developers 100% of the App price for returns, which is 143% of the revenue that the developers get.
I like to think of it in terms of whether the lobster is offended by the pain (something that I doubt quite a bit). That some humans take offense at the pain of a lobster doesn't bother me much.
Of course, I'm allergic, so I should put 'cattle' in there, not lobster.
Slashdot Mirror
Tape?
Finding out that people are stupid and/or mentally ill really isn't that much of a mind fuck.
Imagine what you might end up thinking if you bothered to actually inform yourself.
The Pope has a whole country.
Defaulting on the Chinese debt would put all of the rest of the U.S. debt into question; this could make if difficult to receive oil in exchange for paper (at the very least, Saudi Arabia and other petroleum funded societies would want to continue to trade with the U.S., but they almost certainly wouldn't do it in dollars anymore).
Yeah, that's what I think when I look at China -- "they are going to run out of people sometime soon".
From that page:
"# Bio Visit the official site www.dalailama.com for more information. Not affiliated with the Office of His Holiness, the Dalai Lama."
Take special note of the 'not affiliated' bit. The official story is far less exciting:
http://www.dalailama.com/page.67.htm
When you fly your helicopter out to the yacht, you need to call ahead and ask which helipad to land on.
The web upload system someone mentioned above sounds nice (no dealing with drivers and configuration for the clients...).
The linked bug was not hidden, it wasn't identified as a security issue (it was eventually identified as a duplicate of the bug that was fixed this week, but it was open for months; if you dig in, you will see that Mozilla is examining their processes a bit because of this).
Putting 'son' in your posts makes you come off as a dildo. Just sayin'.
The evalutation for the models can be sarcastically summed up as "they do a pretty good job with the 20th century":
http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/?src=/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/309.htm
http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/?src=/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/336.htm
(a later edition of the report is available here:
http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-wg1.htm
but only as pdf, I am talking about Chapter 8; skimming it a little bit indicates that the above statement continues to hold.)
I'm not qualified enough to pretend to have an opinion on the accuracy of the reports or the likelihood of significant anthropogenic climate change, but I get an uneasy feeling when I compare the apparent confidence of the scientists and the apparent confidence of a lot of advocates.
What do you by fronting?
Reuters has a better article stating that he will have about 3% of the equity (with the ability to purchase more) and 35% of the voting shares:
http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSN1942658120090319
The previous structure gave him near total control of the company and much of the bank debt would become more expensive if he gave up that control. Presumably, his bonds and preferred stock are what gave him that equity, I can't imagine that any of his regular shared survived the deal.
Taxing consumption probably works better.
As far as rain forests, Brazilian ethanol comes from cane which basically won't grow on the soil present in most of the rain forests. The rain forests are being destroyed by (mostly) illegal logging and subsistence farmers who come in and burn the land (the farmers only get a year or two of crops out of the soil before it isn't worth farming, then they move on to an area that has recently been logged...).
Don't forget the billions of individuals that have an interest in cheap energy.
It might not be the best terminology, but it is describing how many days a patch has been available for the vulnerability.
They are being pragmatic. There would be far less apps if they made developers pay for everything (which might be good for iPhone users, as the typical app might end up being higher quality, but Apple makes money on volume here).
See what sarcasm gets ya?
Virtual machines (perhaps inside of virtual machines inside of virtual machines) will keep you working up until a 'bit' loses meaning.
Though I would bet that in 100 years there are widely available apps that can read ascii text, unicode text, pdf, doc, odf, and so on (if only for use by legal researchers and government archivists...).
That link doesn't make your point at all; 1 of the examples is 'people today find it cheesy as hell' (the drunks watching Shakespeare back in the day probably thought so too, they just happened to be drunk, so it was good for a laugh) and the second is 'they don't talk about the vagina innuendo in school' which doesn't have much to do with lacking context (the innuendo isn't particularly obscure). I also doubt that the feign/fain distinction was noticed all that often by typical contemporary viewers (but this is rank speculation on my part), so it is hard to attribute this to the erosion of context.
The implication in the summary (which, according to several posters above, is wrong) is that Apple is charging developers 100% of the App price for returns, which is 143% of the revenue that the developers get.
Numpy adds (fast) support for multidimensional arrays to Python; Scipy provides a bunch of tools for working with Numpy arrays.
Do you distinguish your awareness from the awareness of an ant?
I like to think of it in terms of whether the lobster is offended by the pain (something that I doubt quite a bit). That some humans take offense at the pain of a lobster doesn't bother me much.
Of course, I'm allergic, so I should put 'cattle' in there, not lobster.
How much of what you want do you get with Cython/Pyrex?