How terrible of them to provide a service whereby people can search the news and then click to read the original stories (and they give a reasonable amount of credit right there on the search page...).
So you are proposing that accident victims should simply choose to lose less blood?
I don't think that other phases of emergency care are going to take a successful blood replacement as a license to do less (unless it actually made sense to do so!).
He probably means that Amazon would benefit from actually having a service that published and publicized public domain content for the Kindle.
Basically, he wants pink unicorns, I don't think Amazon is making much profit on the hardware, so making less on the hardware and eating away at book sales is a bit unlikely.
I don't see how it can be sustained, and I worry that the investment (much of which seems to be in U.S. treasuries, but I haven't looked closely at that) is simply being consumed (meaning that standard of living is going to see downward pressure from the deficit balancing back out).
So my concern isn't really about the trade deficit, it is about it going away suddenly, in a way that has a negative impact on my life (I usually ask people if they maintain a trade deficit with their grocery store; it would be hard to find someone who was happy about that trade deficit going away...).
There isn't really anything good about a huge trade deficit, but a ~trillion dollar trade deficit doesn't really prove that a 14 trillion dollar economy is rotten to the core (but I would agree that there are lots of problems).
Wikipedia says that he worked at an investment consulting firm in 1985, but it is likely that he was an analyst, not a quant (based on the timing and the description of the firm...):
Starting in 1988, he held various public positions. The previous Secretary of the Treasury, Hank Paulson, was at one time CEO of Goldman Sachs, perhaps you have your wires crossed?
Geithner never worked for Goldman Sachs. If you are insinuating that Goldman Sachs runs the New York Fed, well, you should just come right out and say it, as next to no one here is going to get the reference.
It has an unashamed left wing perspective. Perhaps that isn't the same thing as a bias, but if you don't think it has a left wing perspective, well, forest, trees, etc..
The Mozilla suite was the replacement for Netscape, Firefox was a project started later on by a group who decided that the focus and methodology of the Mozilla suite was broken.
Sure. On the other hand, that the particulars of this case make the prosecutor look like a fool doesn't mean that there should be any less focus on the way he is trying to use his power.
It probably isolates comments with conflicting moderation and polls the groupthink about what mod it prefers (the different moderation selections have essentially devolved into up and down...).
Redhat has about $650 million in revenues. IBM has about $103 billion. Redhat represents about 2.5 days of a year for IBM (actually quite a bit less if you throw out weekends and such).
Redhat is growing pretty fast, but probably not so fast that IBM would be real worried about buying them (rather than creating their own operation).
(None of this contradicts anything you say, the numbers bring a little bit of perspective)
There isn't any type inference (Psyco helps with that) and there aren't any declarations. It is a bit of a copout, but the often recommended strategy is to rewrite the slow parts in C (which for the people writing the Python interpreter in C was probably a lot easier and more effective than building an advanced compiler...).
Consumption taxes can be effectively levied one country at a time. I suppose you could tax imported oil as if the tanker was a well, but you face all the same problems as a consumption tax there (because there would be some incentive to move any production that consumed oil out of the country doing the taxing).
Slashdot Mirror
How is Google making money on the news aggregation? I don't see any ads here:
http://news.google.com/
So presumably they are making money on search advertising:
http://news.google.com/news?q=profit
How terrible of them to provide a service whereby people can search the news and then click to read the original stories (and they give a reasonable amount of credit right there on the search page...).
So you are proposing that accident victims should simply choose to lose less blood?
I don't think that other phases of emergency care are going to take a successful blood replacement as a license to do less (unless it actually made sense to do so!).
He probably means that Amazon would benefit from actually having a service that published and publicized public domain content for the Kindle.
Basically, he wants pink unicorns, I don't think Amazon is making much profit on the hardware, so making less on the hardware and eating away at book sales is a bit unlikely.
I don't see how it can be sustained, and I worry that the investment (much of which seems to be in U.S. treasuries, but I haven't looked closely at that) is simply being consumed (meaning that standard of living is going to see downward pressure from the deficit balancing back out).
So my concern isn't really about the trade deficit, it is about it going away suddenly, in a way that has a negative impact on my life (I usually ask people if they maintain a trade deficit with their grocery store; it would be hard to find someone who was happy about that trade deficit going away...).
That doesn't even make sense.
Lots of what they have is already accessible anyway:
http://www.loc.gov/library/libarch-digital.html
If you are courteous enough to use lubrication, you might as well do it right and use something water based.
Lately? It is still huge, but it actually shrank a bit the last two years (the graph cites this file as source data, but is 3 years out of date):
http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/historical/gands.txt
And a little less than half of it is oil, which isn't exactly a threat to our ability to manufacture (it is just an expensive habit):
http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/Press-Release/current_press_release/exh9.txt
There isn't really anything good about a huge trade deficit, but a ~trillion dollar trade deficit doesn't really prove that a 14 trillion dollar economy is rotten to the core (but I would agree that there are lots of problems).
Just mount a chainsaw on that sucker.
I'm pretty sure it ends up being situational (so in some cases, 1000 characters would not be copyrightable, but in others 30 might).
Yeah, yeah, yuck it up. In my defense, I noticed it at approximately the same time as you.
10^187 pages.
Oops.
"Znork's third edition, now with only 16 trillion characters per page!"
(It would still require ~1^187 pages...)
Wikipedia says that he worked at an investment consulting firm in 1985, but it is likely that he was an analyst, not a quant (based on the timing and the description of the firm...):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_F._Geithner#Early_career
Starting in 1988, he held various public positions. The previous Secretary of the Treasury, Hank Paulson, was at one time CEO of Goldman Sachs, perhaps you have your wires crossed?
Geithner never worked for Goldman Sachs. If you are insinuating that Goldman Sachs runs the New York Fed, well, you should just come right out and say it, as next to no one here is going to get the reference.
It has an unashamed left wing perspective. Perhaps that isn't the same thing as a bias, but if you don't think it has a left wing perspective, well, forest, trees, etc..
Was that a mushroom period?
The Mozilla suite was the replacement for Netscape, Firefox was a project started later on by a group who decided that the focus and methodology of the Mozilla suite was broken.
The Firefox developers have been actively removing code, but perhaps not as fast as they are adding it.
Into social networking?
Sure. On the other hand, that the particulars of this case make the prosecutor look like a fool doesn't mean that there should be any less focus on the way he is trying to use his power.
It probably isolates comments with conflicting moderation and polls the groupthink about what mod it prefers (the different moderation selections have essentially devolved into up and down...).
Legally. These girls are also being tried in the court of public opinion.
You hear that?
Redhat has about $650 million in revenues. IBM has about $103 billion. Redhat represents about 2.5 days of a year for IBM (actually quite a bit less if you throw out weekends and such).
Redhat is growing pretty fast, but probably not so fast that IBM would be real worried about buying them (rather than creating their own operation).
(None of this contradicts anything you say, the numbers bring a little bit of perspective)
There isn't any type inference (Psyco helps with that) and there aren't any declarations. It is a bit of a copout, but the often recommended strategy is to rewrite the slow parts in C (which for the people writing the Python interpreter in C was probably a lot easier and more effective than building an advanced compiler...).
Consumption taxes can be effectively levied one country at a time. I suppose you could tax imported oil as if the tanker was a well, but you face all the same problems as a consumption tax there (because there would be some incentive to move any production that consumed oil out of the country doing the taxing).