What special sauce exists to allow you to make a generalization like "American sensibilities" while simultaneously preventing you from making a generalization like "Human sensibilities"?
Why do people take internet generalizations personally?
I bet if you did a survey at a typical college protest, at least half of the people there would be receiving significant amounts of support from their parents.
It states that he accessed the accounts by breaking into a Twitter employee's Yahoo! account. I saw it elsewhere and assumed it contained the same info as the WSJ link in the summary.
They are contrasting that 2,000 calories with the calories the rats received from the HFCS. They claim that if a human consumed an amount of HFCS proportionate to what the rats were consuming in the study, they would be consuming 3,000 calories of HFCS per day.
If that is true, I'm not sure how it is BS, or how it makes them scumbags. In context, it is perfectly clear that they are talking about 2,000 calories being a normal diet.
Also, do you attach a great deal of value to $700?
More seriously, of course it did, $700 is not all that much for someone making or paying Western wages, so they will pay it if they need it to do business (i.e., if they think they will earn at least $700 more by purchasing it than if they did not purchase it), whereas personal users still aren't going to be that large a market at $200.
Yes, but the surrounding oceans were very much a military consideration for the United States.
(I mean, Pearl Harbor was nearly as successful as it possibly could have been, and in the end, the only impact it had was, possibly, to extend the time the war took (but really, other American war decisions were probably larger factors, America could have skipped by quite a few hard fought islands; I realize that I just went and talked about an almost entirely different war, fought across a very different ocean, but the Atlantic was very much a strategic asset for the United States at that point in time)).
Slashdot Mirror
There are 3 primary colors because human eyes are most sensitive to 3 particular wavelengths of light.
Add sensitivity to more wavelengths of light and you get more primary colors.
You probably aren't using 'night vision' when you are driving at night.
If price is no object, I am willing to deliver one in a month or two.
Google is better described as the provider of a search tool, they are more than the creator.
If you think a lot of people care deeply about this, you should start your own university.
What special sauce exists to allow you to make a generalization like "American sensibilities" while simultaneously preventing you from making a generalization like "Human sensibilities"?
Why do people take internet generalizations personally?
I bet if you did a survey at a typical college protest, at least half of the people there would be receiving significant amounts of support from their parents.
Did the banks adopt your idea?
Sorry, I was going by this:
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/03/24/twitter-hacker-ordered-to-appear-in-french-court/
It states that he accessed the accounts by breaking into a Twitter employee's Yahoo! account. I saw it elsewhere and assumed it contained the same info as the WSJ link in the summary.
Perhaps the site administrators have powers that you cannot see?
THE BEAR RAPED JESUS!
To clarify, Jon Oliver did that skit.
2 sodas a day could be as much as 20% of your intake...
It is quite likely that it is at least 10% of your intake.
They are contrasting that 2,000 calories with the calories the rats received from the HFCS. They claim that if a human consumed an amount of HFCS proportionate to what the rats were consuming in the study, they would be consuming 3,000 calories of HFCS per day.
If that is true, I'm not sure how it is BS, or how it makes them scumbags. In context, it is perfectly clear that they are talking about 2,000 calories being a normal diet.
Do you have any notion of your consumption of calories before and after you started avoiding high calorie foods?
Sometimes he satisfied his cravings with baked potatoes, other times with french fries.
Reading, it solves problems.
I move that the mob steal a wood chipper.
Sucrose is primarily broken down by enzymes in the small intestine.
They track the amount in the container when they refill it. They make the assumption that the fluid removed from the container ends up in the rat.
Honey is damn near the same thing as HFCS.
What's your response to the part you didn't bother quoting? Here it is again:
so they will pay it if they need it to do business
How much is each edited photo worth to you?
Also, do you attach a great deal of value to $700?
More seriously, of course it did, $700 is not all that much for someone making or paying Western wages, so they will pay it if they need it to do business (i.e., if they think they will earn at least $700 more by purchasing it than if they did not purchase it), whereas personal users still aren't going to be that large a market at $200.
Yes, but the surrounding oceans were very much a military consideration for the United States.
(I mean, Pearl Harbor was nearly as successful as it possibly could have been, and in the end, the only impact it had was, possibly, to extend the time the war took (but really, other American war decisions were probably larger factors, America could have skipped by quite a few hard fought islands; I realize that I just went and talked about an almost entirely different war, fought across a very different ocean, but the Atlantic was very much a strategic asset for the United States at that point in time)).
The Russians had some idea, they were allowing the Germans to conduct training operations on Russian territory.
They will lose majority control, but they will still have lots of power.
For instance, Warren Buffett only owns about 1/3 of Berkshire Hathaway, but he still steers the company (yes, 'only').