In other words, people who pay disney to authenticate their site with Disney or a Disney related service and approval.
I bet 'As people have to agree to our terms of use for Disney paid advertisements, which has billing information, we authenticate their websites so it shows up with a higher ranking'
E.G The search engine is an ad searching machine now.
Actually the trick is not being happy with the way things are and doing something to change them. You're not at the whims of the world, you're at the whims of yourself.
All nut jobs are not posting crazy talk on-line. This is just more of the people in power getting worried that the shit they are up to coming out and there being a revolt, this is revolt prevention.
It's tragic what this gunner did and I don't believe he had that right reasons to do what he did. One day however, if all the dirty laundry comes out, people might have a reason to force a new vote, and disrupt the governments ability to tamper with it. Naturally the government will be opposed to this, and people will protest / try to stop the government.
They want their finger on all of that so they can keep putting in 'security measures' so they can quickly silence legitimate protests and a legitimate revolution over the way the government operates.
Oh god how embarassing. I totally thought that if I made a random post online to slashdot that British military personal would come to Canada, knock on my door and recruit me.
The only change to the word troll is by media retards who want to use a new catchey internet phrase. That's the only thing that's changing it, and that's what's pissing me off.
Yes, people are doing much more prolonged contact online harassing people but it's not trolling just because it's online.
You know what part of the problem is? People are also refusing to leave places. It's like if you knew that you walked down an alley that you didn't need to go down you would get bothered by someone.
So you keep walking down the alley. That's how dumb people are on the internet. Harassed on facebook? Don't use facebook! Harassed on a blog? don't use the blog! Harassed on a forum? Don't use the forum!
There are much more extreme cases but there are laws to arrest those people.
Sorry, I get a little passionate about this kind of crap. Same people who make laws to protect businesses that have failed business models as they like their kick backs are the same people who will make it illegal to say not nice things so politicians can always out maneuver you.
Another generalization to the fucking word troll! Awesome!
STALKING IS NOT TROLLING. IT IS STALKING. HARASSMENT IS NOT TROLLING. IT IS HARASSMENT SEXUAL HARASSMENT IS NOT TROLLING. IT IS SEXUAL HARASSMENT. CREATING FRAUDELENT INFORMATION TO DEFAME SOMEONE IS STILL DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER. AND FRAUD.
Stop trying to shut down the people who decided your fucking house in minecraft should look like a penis to you can make fucking anti troll laws. What's next? Anti not being nice and forgiving me to laws? Fuck you.
Next time someone does a smear campaign online and follows you, ARREST THEM, If I went around some town POSTING PICTURES ALL OVER that were private, fucking wrong, embarassing and put private info on it and other things, I WOULD GO TO JAIL AS THAT IS ILLEGAL So it is on the internet too is it not?
TROLLING - When a comment is made to rile up or bait other people into a discussion. E.G People in Canada don't have roads. That is a TROLL. It's also not a big fucking deal.
However 'BLAH BLAH THIS WOMEN IS A WHORE FOR CRITIQUEING GAMES, HERE IS HER SLUT ADDRESS' That is INVASION of privacy, SEXUAL HARASSMENT, HARASSMENT, DISTURBING THE PEACE and many other things if you added more to it.
Learn the fucking laws people, and I mean you too police officers, and fucking use them properly. Fucking anti not nice to be law bullshit.
red signal indication will be displayed immediately thereafter when vehicular traffic shall not enter the intersection
I like how they put the exact rules right there, a quote from the law but your ignorance over ruled it.
If the light goes red before you clear the intersection you ran it
When the light is RED vehicular traffic SHALL NOT ENTER the intersection. It says absolutely nothing about vehicles not clearing the intersection, or that you are considering have 'ran' the light if it turns red after you have entered the intersection.
You are to stop if safe to do so based on road conditions. If it's slippery and wet, it might be better to cut it close versus slamming on the brakes to not "run" the light.
This isn't trolling at all, it's fabrication, fraud, harassment, libel damage, destruction of someone's life.
This is not fucking trolling. It's a smear campaign among other things, who the fuck though they could call this trolling? Some angry fucking minecraft kid who got mad that his house was turned into a penis so he wants to outlaw trolling?
Trolling is baiting someone into a fight, not the destruction of their life.
Get it out of your thick repressed fucking heads that this kind of sick behavior is not god damn fucking trolling, and stop trying to use the wrong fucking words to make something you don't like illegal and drastric and super fucking wrong.
Inflation and higher cost of living means they have to pay higher wages.
I'm super concerned with that, because the super rich people begin to have issues if they have only two private jets instead of 4, and they might have to purchase a smaller private island if they were forced to work inside the country they're extracting money from.
Equality is a two way street. Men and women both need to accept that they, as individuals, have weaknesses and strengths and just get on with enjoying life.
P.S It's fucking bullshit to just pick out data you want so you can label people misogynists.
If there did actual scientific research into human biological, genetic capabilities and so on to do a study if women are better in the kitchen, there would be such an outrage over it, people would go blind with hatred, regardless of the results. No actually, if the results confirmed that women were genetically dispositioned to be better home makers / do cleaning / kitchen work on average, people would react a whole ton worse, even if the research was 100000000% unbiased and accurate, throwing feminists into a super frenzy, and it would just transfer from science directly into pure male hatred.
You would be hated for being right. So little evidence to support the assertion that women are better at cooking is what you'll always have as no one who wants a career and a peaceful life would ever consider that study.
Actually it is. Not all men can run faster than all women, and not all women can run faster than all men. So what you said, is actually 100% sexist.
Some men are great in the kitchen, some women suck in the kitchen. Vice versa.
If you want to get into biology and genetics, it would be correct to say, "On average, the average man in good health without special training or efforts may run faster or be stronger than the average women in the same conditions" could be correct, for averages. However there are women genetically predispositioned to be faster and stronger than the average man. Taller, etc, whatever trait you want.
True, and no women has had to worry about getting someone pregnant. So there are a few biological differences like that.
But equality is talking about social equality, not the biologicaldifferences or equality. Tasks that humans in society have come up with that are beyond our biological designs.
In biology, men are designed on average to be stronger and faster than a women, but that doesn't stop a women from being stronger and faster than a man In fact, based on genetics, some women may naturally be faster and stronger without additional effort. However on average it will take effort to surpass this
It's pure discrimination. It was widely known that physiologically and psychologically a woman is better suited for space flights
A statement like 'Women are physiologically and psychologically better suited to cooking" is sexist
But you think what you said isn't discrimination? Holy shit, ignorant feminist minority alert.
Discrimination that likely happened back then is really sad and unfortunate, however saying "Let's fix this and make things proper, and equal, as women are superior" is dumb as shit.
Some men are complete air heads and shouldn't be trusted with a toaster, some women don't know how to tell time on an analog clock. The opposite is also true. The concept of gender equality is that, some men will be amazing at task A, some women will be amazing at task a.
Some men will be terrible at task A, some women will be terrible at task A. Individually people are different, some better some worse regardless of gender and people need to start recognizing that.
It's so ignorant when people think that they can rally the support of decent people under the banner of equality, then think they can abuse it, and do the reverse, abuse men, and then they'll still have the support to do it.
It won't happen. The only reason women were treated better and gained equal rights is because back when men held all the power, there were men who were not ignorant and recognized that a women is just as capable as a man, and therefore could influence the other men in power to open their eyes,
And I'm not saying it wasn't without an amazing effort by women before anyone tries to turn it into that. What I am saying, if you can remove yourself from your gender ego issues, is that "Without support from the people in power, the people not in power would not have been able to get the changes to occur."
Also before someone tries some ignorant but the people not in power do control it like how we vote with the government. No! The people have the power, and anything the government does is by using our combined power based on our votes, we can also strip them of the use of our power. (our being gender neutral here)
Manipulative disruptive and threatening behavior, I agree with what you said about that.
However speakers being shouted down, bulled off stage (I left out hounded as that implies following / harassment), well, you have a right to an opinion. You don't have a right to have everyone listen to it and not have a rebuttal, or make fun of it for it not being sane or logical.
In real life if you kept shouting out things in public, there are going to be people who disagree with you and say things you don't like in a normal public area.
Yeah I don't think "trolling" is the term of what they need t go after.
Trolling is making a comment to annoy people, I think if it's a general comment, normal trolling, they should back off. If you're directly going after someone, it's not "trolling" anymore, it's a personal attack. That should be an entirely differnent law then some anti-trolling law.
Personal attacks on public media has never been an acceptable practice, you can't keep going on air somewhere and targeting someone, that's harassment. Doing it on the internet isn't some unknown ground, it's the same thing and the same laws should apply.
If your putting yourself up on the internet, expect some trolls or comments you don't like, you can't outlaw that, but if they start following you around everywhere you go online and doing it, it becomes a personal attack.
Imagine if you went on different talk shows. If someone in the audiance didn't like you, said something intentionally to infuriorate you, is that illegal trolling? No.
If someone went to every talk show you participate on, to do the same thing, is that a personal attack and that person is harassing you? Yes. We have laws for that already. Fucking use them properly.
Slashdot Mirror
In other words, people who pay disney to authenticate their site with Disney or a Disney related service and approval.
I bet 'As people have to agree to our terms of use for Disney paid advertisements, which has billing information, we authenticate their websites so it shows up with a higher ranking'
E.G The search engine is an ad searching machine now.
You're right, it does come when people confuse cause and effect.
Equal opportunity does not mean equal results.
Time to stop buying apple for you maybe?
Join those of us don't own apple products and aren't raging like you are.
Actually the trick is not being happy with the way things are and doing something to change them.
You're not at the whims of the world, you're at the whims of yourself.
Aren't you fucking special.
All nut jobs are not posting crazy talk on-line. This is just more of the people in power getting worried that the shit they are up to coming out and there being a revolt, this is revolt prevention.
It's tragic what this gunner did and I don't believe he had that right reasons to do what he did. One day however, if all the dirty laundry comes out, people might have a reason to force a new vote, and disrupt the governments ability to tamper with it. Naturally the government will be opposed to this, and people will protest / try to stop the government.
They want their finger on all of that so they can keep putting in 'security measures' so they can quickly silence legitimate protests and a legitimate revolution over the way the government operates.
Because...internet can get you killed?
Yes, I don't actually enjoy games that have respawn nearly as much as ones that don't, or have expensive consequences.
E.G I love Eve online, losing a ship is expensive, it doesn't respawn, you have to buy another one, full cost. Except if your alliance helps you out.
Or games like diablo 3, hard core mode only.
Simulation mode in war thunder, planes and tanks get a single life.
I wish there were more games that had that consequence that makes you really not want to die or lose your assets, but a lot of people don't go for it.
Oh god how embarassing. I totally thought that if I made a random post online to slashdot that British military personal would come to Canada, knock on my door and recruit me.
How do you even keyboard?
I consider myself capable of flying or driving anything from remote aircraft, aircraft carriers, submarines, and tanks in a remote setting.
Does he LIVE with his family?
I certainly don't. If I caught Ebola, it would be much more likely that anyone but my family will get it.
The only change to the word troll is by media retards who want to use a new catchey internet phrase. That's the only thing that's changing it, and that's what's pissing me off.
Yes, people are doing much more prolonged contact online harassing people but it's not trolling just because it's online.
You know what part of the problem is? People are also refusing to leave places. It's like if you knew that you walked down an alley that you didn't need to go down you would get bothered by someone.
So you keep walking down the alley. That's how dumb people are on the internet. Harassed on facebook? Don't use facebook! Harassed on a blog? don't use the blog! Harassed on a forum? Don't use the forum!
There are much more extreme cases but there are laws to arrest those people.
Sorry, I get a little passionate about this kind of crap. Same people who make laws to protect businesses that have failed business models as they like their kick backs are the same people who will make it illegal to say not nice things so politicians can always out maneuver you.
Another generalization to the fucking word troll! Awesome!
STALKING IS NOT TROLLING. IT IS STALKING.
HARASSMENT IS NOT TROLLING. IT IS HARASSMENT
SEXUAL HARASSMENT IS NOT TROLLING. IT IS SEXUAL HARASSMENT.
CREATING FRAUDELENT INFORMATION TO DEFAME SOMEONE IS STILL DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER. AND FRAUD.
Stop trying to shut down the people who decided your fucking house in minecraft should look like a penis to you can make fucking anti troll laws. What's next? Anti not being nice and forgiving me to laws? Fuck you.
Next time someone does a smear campaign online and follows you, ARREST THEM, If I went around some town POSTING PICTURES ALL OVER that were private, fucking wrong, embarassing and put private info on it and other things, I WOULD GO TO JAIL AS THAT IS ILLEGAL
So it is on the internet too is it not?
TROLLING - When a comment is made to rile up or bait other people into a discussion. E.G People in Canada don't have roads.
That is a TROLL. It's also not a big fucking deal.
However 'BLAH BLAH THIS WOMEN IS A WHORE FOR CRITIQUEING GAMES, HERE IS HER SLUT ADDRESS'
That is INVASION of privacy, SEXUAL HARASSMENT, HARASSMENT, DISTURBING THE PEACE and many other things if you added more to it.
Learn the fucking laws people, and I mean you too police officers, and fucking use them properly. Fucking anti not nice to be law bullshit.
red signal indication will be displayed immediately thereafter when vehicular traffic shall not enter the intersection
I like how they put the exact rules right there, a quote from the law but your ignorance over ruled it.
If the light goes red before you clear the intersection you ran it
When the light is RED vehicular traffic SHALL NOT ENTER the intersection.
It says absolutely nothing about vehicles not clearing the intersection, or that you are considering have 'ran' the light if it turns red after you have entered the intersection.
You are to stop if safe to do so based on road conditions. If it's slippery and wet, it might be better to cut it close versus slamming on the brakes to not "run" the light.
This isn't trolling at all, it's fabrication, fraud, harassment, libel damage, destruction of someone's life.
This is not fucking trolling. It's a smear campaign among other things, who the fuck though they could call this trolling? Some angry fucking minecraft kid who got mad that his house was turned into a penis so he wants to outlaw trolling?
Trolling is baiting someone into a fight, not the destruction of their life.
Get it out of your thick repressed fucking heads that this kind of sick behavior is not god damn fucking trolling, and stop trying to use the wrong fucking words to make something you don't like illegal and drastric and super fucking wrong.
This is crazy, man, people, whine about everything to get people to pay attention to them.
I want to see 'People are using cell phones and not taking safety precautions anymore, such as bucking their seatbelt during take off and landing."
Not 'I stand up there and people are ignoring me, I will sue now'
Inflation and higher cost of living means they have to pay higher wages.
I'm super concerned with that, because the super rich people begin to have issues if they have only two private jets instead of 4, and they might have to purchase a smaller private island if they were forced to work inside the country they're extracting money from.
Equality is a two way street. Men and women both need to accept that they, as individuals, have weaknesses and strengths and just get on with enjoying life.
Amen.
P.S It's fucking bullshit to just pick out data you want so you can label people misogynists.
If there did actual scientific research into human biological, genetic capabilities and so on to do a study if women are better in the kitchen, there would be such an outrage over it, people would go blind with hatred, regardless of the results. No actually, if the results confirmed that women were genetically dispositioned to be better home makers / do cleaning / kitchen work on average, people would react a whole ton worse, even if the research was 100000000% unbiased and accurate, throwing feminists into a super frenzy, and it would just transfer from science directly into pure male hatred.
You would be hated for being right. So little evidence to support the assertion that women are better at cooking is what you'll always have as no one who wants a career and a peaceful life would ever consider that study.
"Men can run faster than women" is not sexist"
Actually it is. Not all men can run faster than all women, and not all women can run faster than all men.
So what you said, is actually 100% sexist.
Some men are great in the kitchen, some women suck in the kitchen. Vice versa.
If you want to get into biology and genetics, it would be correct to say, "On average, the average man in good health without special training or efforts may run faster or be stronger than the average women in the same conditions" could be correct, for averages. However there are women genetically predispositioned to be faster and stronger than the average man. Taller, etc, whatever trait you want.
True, and no women has had to worry about getting someone pregnant. So there are a few biological differences like that.
But equality is talking about social equality, not the biologicaldifferences or equality.
Tasks that humans in society have come up with that are beyond our biological designs.
In biology, men are designed on average to be stronger and faster than a women, but that doesn't stop a women from being stronger and faster than a man
In fact, based on genetics, some women may naturally be faster and stronger without additional effort.
However on average it will take effort to surpass this
It's pure discrimination. It was widely known that physiologically and psychologically a woman is better suited for space flights
A statement like 'Women are physiologically and psychologically better suited to cooking" is sexist
But you think what you said isn't discrimination? Holy shit, ignorant feminist minority alert.
Discrimination that likely happened back then is really sad and unfortunate, however saying "Let's fix this and make things proper, and equal, as women are superior" is dumb as shit.
Some men are complete air heads and shouldn't be trusted with a toaster, some women don't know how to tell time on an analog clock.
The opposite is also true. The concept of gender equality is that, some men will be amazing at task A, some women will be amazing at task a.
Some men will be terrible at task A, some women will be terrible at task A.
Individually people are different, some better some worse regardless of gender and people need to start recognizing that.
It's so ignorant when people think that they can rally the support of decent people under the banner of equality, then think they can abuse it, and do the reverse, abuse men, and then they'll still have the support to do it.
It won't happen. The only reason women were treated better and gained equal rights is because back when men held all the power, there were men who were not ignorant and recognized that a women is just as capable as a man, and therefore could influence the other men in power to open their eyes,
And I'm not saying it wasn't without an amazing effort by women before anyone tries to turn it into that. What I am saying, if you can remove yourself from your gender ego issues, is that "Without support from the people in power, the people not in power would not have been able to get the changes to occur."
Also before someone tries some ignorant but the people not in power do control it like how we vote with the government.
No! The people have the power, and anything the government does is by using our combined power based on our votes, we can also strip them of the use of our power. (our being gender neutral here)
Then I suppose the majority of Parliament should turn themselves over to the authorities poste-haste, wouldn't you say?
Tax trolling?
Manipulative disruptive and threatening behavior, I agree with what you said about that.
However speakers being shouted down, bulled off stage (I left out hounded as that implies following / harassment), well, you have a right to an opinion.
You don't have a right to have everyone listen to it and not have a rebuttal, or make fun of it for it not being sane or logical.
In real life if you kept shouting out things in public, there are going to be people who disagree with you and say things you don't like in a normal public area.
Yeah I don't think "trolling" is the term of what they need t go after.
Trolling is making a comment to annoy people, I think if it's a general comment, normal trolling, they should back off. If you're directly going after someone, it's not "trolling" anymore, it's a personal attack. That should be an entirely differnent law then some anti-trolling law.
Personal attacks on public media has never been an acceptable practice, you can't keep going on air somewhere and targeting someone, that's harassment.
Doing it on the internet isn't some unknown ground, it's the same thing and the same laws should apply.
If your putting yourself up on the internet, expect some trolls or comments you don't like, you can't outlaw that, but if they start following you around everywhere you go online and doing it, it becomes a personal attack.
Imagine if you went on different talk shows. If someone in the audiance didn't like you, said something intentionally to infuriorate you, is that illegal trolling? No.
If someone went to every talk show you participate on, to do the same thing, is that a personal attack and that person is harassing you? Yes.
We have laws for that already. Fucking use them properly.