Blowing up commercial satellites just because you don't want them there will probably result in retaliation, which means no GPS and no Galileo. Back to good old map and compass for all ships around the world. Because that's what you implied that any of these countries wanted?
Work ON - possibly. Work WITH - no. The differences and general feeling of quality and design between the two API:s is staggering. For personal projects, I would choose Qt because I can create a wokring application much faster with it compared to GTK+.
Actually, if you look closer at "Oops" or "Hit me baby", you will notice that they are actually two metal songs in disguise. Imagine the same songs, but done with a good metal band. It wouldn't sound too bad. Meshuggah would of course make the song totally twisted and absurd, but that's not my point here.
Now, try to do the same with a song by JLo or Eminem. Ewww. Would sound worse than Creed.
I'm sorry to ask, but what the hell does those commands do? Oh, and the only lines that worked for me on my Mac OS X install was #2 and #4, and it still looked like crap. I guess that only the very last line works for Windows users.
The dumbing down of GNOME has absolutely nothing to do with OpenUsability. I'm not really sure who to blame for turning a pretty good desktop into a software where all the settings you would really want to change are available only via a Regedit clone.
At least we have KDE, which is improving at an impressive rate, while we wait for the GNOME guys to realize their mistakes.
I was under the impression that the Wright brothers developed the flying machine in the US. And don't you think it's kinda ironic that an airplane was used to drop the two atomic bombs on Japan?
I have used OpenOffice and StarOffice on OS/2, Windows and Linux (in that order). Wanted to try the Mac version too, and since X11 is already installed - no problem.
One second after it launched, I knew exactly why Mac users hate it. Amongst my Mac applications, there is one ugly as Stephen's mom application breaking almost every user interface rule there is. Even the simplest one (there's a perfectly fine menubar at the top of my screen, you bastards) was ignored.
Re:No matter how hard C is, gtk/glib is impressive
on
GTK 2.6.0 Released
·
· Score: 1
Nope, try again, QT isn't opensource! Stick with GTK and try GTKmm as the parent said, it's the only way to stay within the GPL.
So, what you are saying is: to stay within the GPL, you should the LGPL:ed GTK+ instead of the GPL:ed Qt. This makes no sense to me at all. Could it be that you don't have a damn clue about what you are talking about?
I'm not sure what the hell you mean here. GCC set to run with higher priority costs no more than ordinary GCC. Also - proprietary software costs money regardless of platform. A KDE version of Photoshop costs no more than a GNOME version.
No. Try it yourself: copy a 500MB file. In a copy-on-write system, this would be done in an instant. The actual duplication of file data would be done when you modify a byte in one of the files.
Think of it as hardlinks, but when you modify the contents of one file the link is separated and all file data stored in a new data stream.
Actually, we still have the old agreement where you could travel through Sweden, Norway and Denmark if you were from one of those countries. We share a history where large parts of our countries have been owned by each other, and have languages that are quite similar. No new, fancy EU thing will take that away.
Och nästa år MÅSTE jag besöka Trondheim på sjuttonde maj. Som en otrolig fest med grannen.:-)
I prefer Six Feet Under, which features the previous Cannibal Corpse "singer" Chris Barnes. He has improved his skills a lot lately, so you can actually hear every word that he growls!
Oh, and the best song on Tomb Of The Mutilated has to be Necropedophile.
Unfortunately not. And it sucks ass. It's even more annoying when you have configured KDE to use a shared MacOS style menu, and Gimp or some other app chooses to do the "fuck you and your preferences" routine.
Unfortunately, this won't change. The people behind X seems to hate the thought of a general API for showing a button or a menu or a what-you-want.
Isn't GNU Emacs really at version number 1.21.x.y but they just skip the leading "1." when writing it? Then this would be the same, except that it's just a programming language and not an operating system in desperate need of a good editor.
Slashdot Mirror
Linux is a kernel. Why would a Unix-workalike kernel embed a database?
Blowing up commercial satellites just because you don't want them there will probably result in retaliation, which means no GPS and no Galileo. Back to good old map and compass for all ships around the world. Because that's what you implied that any of these countries wanted?
You mean, besides that the Posix threading API might not be available in the platform you're currently compiling for?
Work ON - possibly. Work WITH - no. The differences and general feeling of quality and design between the two API:s is staggering. For personal projects, I would choose Qt because I can create a wokring application much faster with it compared to GTK+.
Did you have to get special training to become retarded or were you born that way?
Three years of university, actually. Thanks for asking, mr Coward.
Actually, if you look closer at "Oops" or "Hit me baby", you will notice that they are actually two metal songs in disguise. Imagine the same songs, but done with a good metal band. It wouldn't sound too bad. Meshuggah would of course make the song totally twisted and absurd, but that's not my point here.
Now, try to do the same with a song by JLo or Eminem. Ewww. Would sound worse than Creed.
The US always has paid for its own messes ... and eventually, for everyone else's.
You mean, like you have paid Vietnam for your screwup there? Oops, my bad - you haven't done that yet, despite being ordered to. Any plans to do that?
What, can't they say fuck like ordinary people?
I'm sorry to ask, but what the hell does those commands do? Oh, and the only lines that worked for me on my Mac OS X install was #2 and #4, and it still looked like crap. I guess that only the very last line works for Windows users.
The dumbing down of GNOME has absolutely nothing to do with OpenUsability. I'm not really sure who to blame for turning a pretty good desktop into a software where all the settings you would really want to change are available only via a Regedit clone.
At least we have KDE, which is improving at an impressive rate, while we wait for the GNOME guys to realize their mistakes.
I was under the impression that the Wright brothers developed the flying machine in the US. And don't you think it's kinda ironic that an airplane was used to drop the two atomic bombs on Japan?
Exactly where are Å, Ä and Ö placed on a Dvorak keyboard?
We'd all like to say "Bonjour" to Windows...
:-)
American, I presume?
I have used OpenOffice and StarOffice on OS/2, Windows and Linux (in that order). Wanted to try the Mac version too, and since X11 is already installed - no problem.
One second after it launched, I knew exactly why Mac users hate it. Amongst my Mac applications, there is one ugly as Stephen's mom application breaking almost every user interface rule there is. Even the simplest one (there's a perfectly fine menubar at the top of my screen, you bastards) was ignored.
THAT'S the main reason it's not used on the Mac.
192.168.0.1
Nope, try again, QT isn't opensource! Stick with GTK and try GTKmm as the parent said, it's the only way to stay within the GPL.
So, what you are saying is: to stay within the GPL, you should the LGPL:ed GTK+ instead of the GPL:ed Qt. This makes no sense to me at all. Could it be that you don't have a damn clue about what you are talking about?
So you live in a state in America. Which country? Last time I checked, both North and South America consisted of a large amount of separate countries.
(do you see the difference between "american" and "USA:ian" now?)
I'm not sure what the hell you mean here. GCC set to run with higher priority costs no more than ordinary GCC. Also - proprietary software costs money regardless of platform. A KDE version of Photoshop costs no more than a GNOME version.
No. Try it yourself: copy a 500MB file. In a copy-on-write system, this would be done in an instant. The actual duplication of file data would be done when you modify a byte in one of the files.
Think of it as hardlinks, but when you modify the contents of one file the link is separated and all file data stored in a new data stream.
"ZFS, the Last Word in File Systems?"
The last word in file systems is "systems". And stop asking file systems these questions, you fool.
Actually, we still have the old agreement where you could travel through Sweden, Norway and Denmark if you were from one of those countries. We share a history where large parts of our countries have been owned by each other, and have languages that are quite similar. No new, fancy EU thing will take that away.
:-)
Och nästa år MÅSTE jag besöka Trondheim på sjuttonde maj. Som en otrolig fest med grannen.
I prefer Six Feet Under, which features the previous Cannibal Corpse "singer" Chris Barnes. He has improved his skills a lot lately, so you can actually hear every word that he growls!
Oh, and the best song on Tomb Of The Mutilated has to be Necropedophile.
Unfortunately not. And it sucks ass. It's even more annoying when you have configured KDE to use a shared MacOS style menu, and Gimp or some other app chooses to do the "fuck you and your preferences" routine.
Unfortunately, this won't change. The people behind X seems to hate the thought of a general API for showing a button or a menu or a what-you-want.
d) stalked by a psycotic ex-girlfriend?
Isn't GNU Emacs really at version number 1.21.x.y but they just skip the leading "1." when writing it? Then this would be the same, except that it's just a programming language and not an operating system in desperate need of a good editor.