Sony can't pick up a OS which has Standards. Sony only use things which are build in Sonystandrds.
It's like MemoryStick. Why don't the use CompactFlash oder Smartmedia?
I think it sounds intressting, but i hope that the fact that they will use the linux kernel 2.4x and Xfree won't have the result, that the new BeOS isn't so fast than the old one. A few years ago, when the First public BeOS Version was released Be told the people that this OS is so fast because it uses a Miragekernel which was completly rewritten in Assembler. What's about the new Idea? Possible to run fast as the old one?
Re:Konqueror is better than Mozilla
on
Mozilla 0.9.5
·
· Score: 1
I use both. Konqueror under Linux and Mozilla under Windows. And I think you are right Konqueror is mutch better. It has more features than Mozilla.
Slashdot Mirror
I pay 61EUR for my ADSL flatrate and telefon(ISDN).
ADSL: 2048KBit/s Down, 192KBit/s UP
For additional 5EUR per month I could upgrade my ADSL flatrate to:
4096KBit/s Down, 384KBit/s UP
Sony can't pick up a OS which has Standards. Sony only use things which are build in Sonystandrds.
It's like MemoryStick. Why don't the use CompactFlash oder Smartmedia?
I think it sounds intressting, but i hope that the fact that they will use the linux kernel 2.4x and Xfree won't have the result, that the new BeOS isn't so fast than the old one. A few years ago, when the First public BeOS Version was released Be told the people that this OS is so fast because it uses a Miragekernel which was completly rewritten in Assembler. What's about the new Idea? Possible to run fast as the old one?
I use both. Konqueror under Linux and Mozilla under Windows. And I think you are right Konqueror is mutch better. It has more features than Mozilla.