Slashdot Mirror


Sony, Toshiba And IBM To Develop New OS

gaijin writes: "According to this article in the English version of the Japanese newspaper 'Daily Yomirui', Sony will use its experience developing the PS2 OS (hey, wasn't it Linux based?) and work with Toshiba and IBM at the hardware side to create a new OS that 'would allow personal computers and home appliances to exchange huge volumes of data, including the high-resolution graphics of a television screen, through a broadband connection.'"

198 comments

  1. Sounds to me . . . by acceleriter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    . . . like they'll probably be licensing that Microsoft Digital "Rights" Management patent. I would beware of any OS offering from the likes of Sony that claims to be all about media over a broadband connection.

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    1. Re:Sounds to me . . . by jfandre · · Score: 0, Troll

      ohhh boy, with IBM involved, it just might end up being a warmed over version of OS/2.. yee hah,, I can hardly wait !!!!!!

    2. Re:Sounds to me . . . by acceleriter · · Score: 1

      Ouch. Copy protection meets the Workplace Shell.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    3. Re:Sounds to me . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bring back Taligent and Kalieda. There's no need for new operating systems, just use the old ones that were ahead of their times anyway.

    4. Re:Sounds to me . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft's already liscensed some rights to Taligent.

  2. Apache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No offense, but what does this story have to do with Apache? Unless I missed something in the article, there is no mention of Apache anywhere.

    Regards,

    AC

    1. Re:Apache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just woke up, right? No offense, but who said this story has something to do with Apache?

    2. Re:apache? by Techi · · Score: 1

      reduces the number of those stupid 'first post' things that you see if you view all messages...doesn't help much, though

      --
      "You think that's air you're breathing now?"
  3. The possibilities are endless! by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny
    a new OS that 'would allow personal computers and home appliances to exchange huge volumes of data, including the high-resolution graphics of a television screen,

    Wonderful. I could watch the cheese in the fridge grow mold on the TV, or even put it on the web. Beats Survivor, anyway.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:The possibilities are endless! by mplex · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see a bar code scanner on my frig and perhaps some weights to tell me when my food is 'kaput.'

    2. Re:The possibilities are endless! by __rsub__ · · Score: 1

      or watch my fridge getting slashdotted...

    3. Re:The possibilities are endless! by screwtheNSA · · Score: 0

      This is a job for Captain cuecat! (available FREE at your non-participating Radio Shck store)*You've got questions, they've got questions too* PS: Get the 68-1965 model, they are better equipped for hacking! The 68-1965A models are blob-tech and epoxy is not easily removed, nor soldered to.Hyundai 90C54-GB189 mask/OTP microcontroller(8051variant) Nat: LM358 AF amp, 74VHCT373 Octal latch/buffer, Mot: HC4066 quad switch, ATC: 93LC460026 EEPROM(8-pin D.I.P) clocked at 14.7456Mhz. Dump the EEPROM or cut the DO line to cancel the Ser No. Just trying to do my part making D.C. angry!

      --
      206.39.38.2, DDN-BLK-36, DOD NET INFO CENTER. 800.365.3642 206.36.0.0-206.39.255.255 NET RANGE.
  4. Can you say "reinventing the wheel"? by Colin+Bayer · · Score: 1

    ... work with Toshiba and IBM at the hardware side to create a new OS that "would allow personal computers and home appliances to exchange huge volumes of data, including the high-resolution graphics of a television screen, through a broadband connection."

    Whoa... I just thought of a great name for that...

    here it is: "Cable TV"! I get copyright dibs!

    Seriously, though, people have been building OSes that were about "moving data" since the beginnings of UNIX. That's what operating systems and computers are for.

    PS: does anyone else find it odd that this was posted under "Apache"?

    --
    Want Linux games? HERE.
    1. Re:Can you say "reinventing the wheel"? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I get copyright dibs!

      Just remember that Stimpy has Prior Art for the Cheese-O-Phone.

      Beats me why they don't pickup BeOS or just run with Linux... Closing source or proprietary technology is probably it. Sony's wicked with proprietary interfaces and devices.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Can you say "reinventing the wheel"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Beats me why they don't pickup BeOS or just run with Linux... Closing source or proprietary technology is probably it. Sony's wicked with proprietary interfaces and devices.

      Because of the licenses they're under? You're forgetting these are corporations we're dealing with.

    3. Re:Can you say "reinventing the wheel"? by NFec · · Score: 1

      Sony can't pick up a OS which has Standards. Sony only use things which are build in Sonystandrds.
      It's like MemoryStick. Why don't the use CompactFlash oder Smartmedia?

  5. Apache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This belongs in the apache section, why, exactly?

  6. apache? by Arctic+Fox · · Score: 1

    why is this under the apache catagory?
    (3rd time i tried this.. why is there a 20 second delay between hitting reply and hitting submit?)

  7. High resolution pictures? by Warped-Reality · · Score: 1

    Since when was a telivision image high resolution?
    I isn't somewhere around 352x240?

    --
    This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    1. Re:High resolution pictures? by mindriot · · Score: 3, Informative

      At least the PAL system (mostly used in Europe), it's 768x576.

    2. Re:High resolution pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Since when was a telivision image high resolution? I isn't somewhere around 352x240?

      You isn't?

      If you meant IT isn't, then you'd be correct - it isn't anywhere near 352x240.

      NTSC resolution (including overscan area) is more like 720x482 (horizontal is subjective, as there is no "fixed" X resolution - but 720 is close enough)

    3. Re:High resolution pictures? by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1

      720 x 576.

    4. Re:High resolution pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no standard for horizontal sampling rate, only frequently used figures!

    5. Re:High resolution pictures? by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
      True enough, but it ain't 768...
      704 for analogue
      720 for digital
      864 (868? I forget) for total including blanking
      and less than 720 for various safe areas...

      but not, I think, 768...

  8. And Apache is involved how exactly? by NullAndVoid · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Why is this filed under "Apache"? It's not mentioned in the story that I can find.

    --


    -- Sigs are for losers
    1. Re:And Apache is involved how exactly? by hasse · · Score: 1

      Please read the article before you post! Even though they don't state this explicitly, the os will clearly be implemented as an Apache mod (modAPPLIANCEMULTIMEDIABROADBANDOS). Finally, the one thing Apache has been missing all along.

    2. Re:And Apache is involved how exactly? by Tom7 · · Score: 1

      "Apache" is pretty close to "Appliance". Come on, use your noggin'.

  9. Why? by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It looks to me like they want something with Digital Rights Management, but don't want to work with Microsoft (and Linux is too open). Evil.

    It's also worth noting that 2005 is about the time the next Playstation should emerge. That's not a coincidence.

    --
    It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    1. Re:Why? by pointym5 · · Score: 1

      BING!!! Give that man a cigar. I think that's exactly right.

    2. Re:Why? by HeUnique · · Score: 2

      Putting DRM in Linux (as it is on Windows today) could take couple of days for 2 programmers to implement - this is really an easy part.

      I do think that OS that they're talking about is Linux based one since IBM knows and embrases Linux, Toshiba (in Japan) sells quite a lot of Linux servers there (and anyway - the Toshiba part here is to manufacture the semi-conductors like they make today the Emotion engine for Sony Playstation 2), and of course - Sony got lots of experience with Linux since Linux is the development OS for the PlayStation 2.

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    3. Re:Why? by archen · · Score: 1

      I guess my question would be, why aren't they using a BSD variant as a base? It's under a 'do what you want with it' licence, and NetBSD has already been ported to everything but a hoover vacuume cleaner (maybe that too). To me this already sounds like vaporware... making an OS from scratch is one thing, but getting 3 corperations to agree on where to start seems like it would be a miricle in and of itself.

    4. Re:Why? by pjc50 · · Score: 1

      And taking it out again (or hacking it to let you fast-forward pass the trailers) would take one programmer about half an hour. That's why there can't be DRM in Linux - the user can alter either the DRM software or the entire system around it in order to take content out of the DRM wrapper.

    5. Re:Why? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      They'll probably base it on some BSD variant. That way most of the Linux experience will transfer, and a lot of the applications can also be transferred with minimal effort. But by basing it off BSD they don't need to release any more source than they want to.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  10. I'm no expert... by green+pizza · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... but this sounds like more of a PR op than anything else. Since when has a game console shuffled more data than a workstation or even a desktop computer? And since when has a TV (even an HDTV) been higher resolution than a 21" monitor?

    It's PR BS, but hopefully the OS will have some merit. Choice is good.

    1. Re:I'm no expert... by nathanm · · Score: 2
      And since when has a TV (even an HDTV) been higher resolution than a 21" monitor?
      Hopefully, by then we'll all have huge, widescreen HDTVs. I can dream, can't I?
    2. Re:I'm no expert... by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 1

      I concurr. This is likely a PR tool by the three companies. The article gives no details on how they intend to push this. By the time it hits the streets and Windows XP 2005 is out it couldn't compete in the PC marketplace. The OS battle is already raging. Familiarity is the sword M$ wields that keeps others from switching to Linux or *BSD.

      I highly doubt a new OS to debute in 2005 for the stated purpose of moving high-volumes of data around via broadband will float. By that time M$ will have developed a highly proprietary OS (maybe with the support of the RIAA to enable stronger copy-protection). Give the linux community a year and we'll have that in spades.

      --
      Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
  11. What's This About TV Resolution? by Lethyos · · Score: 4, Funny

    exchange huge volumes of data, including the high-resolution graphics of a television screen

    So, the product is already vaporware?

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:What's This About TV Resolution? by Corrado · · Score: 1

      Yea, and I like this statment:

      The larger bandwidth of a broadband connection will open the door to the downloading of movies, TV programs and video games via the Internet, the sources said.

      Wow, I've only been waiting for a broadband connection to my house for about 5 years now. It's good to know that I only have 5 more years to wait. And then someone will install SpyWare on my refridgerator and I'll get coupons for Ben & Jerry's and Weight Watchers.

      Hmmmm...maybe that's not such a bad idea... :)

      --
      KangarooBox - We make IT simple!
    2. Re:What's This About TV Resolution? by sorbits · · Score: 1
      Furthermore the article says: TVs with the OS installed will be much smaller as they will not need a tuner, the sources said.

      hmm... the tuner in the settopbox in front of me is actually a lot smaller than the x86 (incl. cooling) in the pc which is also in front of me...

    3. Re:What's This About TV Resolution? by Webmonger · · Score: 2

      Yes, but the tuner on the TV card in the x86 in front of me is smaller than any settop box I've ever seen!

      [I think we disagree on what tuner means-- I think it's the thing that turns a broadcast TV signal on channel X into a into a composite video signal and audio signal]

  12. Hmmh... by petril · · Score: 1

    Its of coz good that theyre making
    some new r&d but this thing
    seems to be just a solution for "simple mass"
    ( sorry if offending some1 ;-)..

    --
    "Never give up, never surrender!"
    1. Re:Hmmh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In America we say "unwashed masses." :)


      I agree with you first statement. This is going to have tons of new R&d involved. And hopefully it's not going to just be about pretty buttons and neat slider bars.

  13. Huh?? by hyrdra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What does this new OS provide that we don't already have and are not already capable of doing? You can already watch TV on your computer and view your computer's monitor on your TV. Regular NTSC resolution isn't that high anyway and is easily handled by a computer. You can already store television programs on your computer -- in fact, we even have things like TiVo which are consumer devices just for that purpose.

    Also via X-10 hardware we can control just about anything from our PCs -- including air conditioners. The problem isn't availability, it's just that most people don't really need to control their microwave or other hosehold devices/appliances from their computer.

    The new OS sounds cool, and the companies developing it are respectful and would no doubt produce a quality product, but there is much more information needed besides the media-PR blurb given in that article. I get the sense that this paper didn't have anything else to write about so it made something up, because throughout the article not one department or source is mentioned besides "industry sources". I would also think the three huge companies mentioned -- IBM, Toshiba, and Sony wouldn't work together anyway. Each one would be more than capable of developing and operating system on their own, and IMO there would be too much departmental overlay to justify cooperation with two other huge firms.

    Work on the OS project has not yet begun, but the three companies have begun joint development of next-generation semiconductors that will be hundreds of times faster than current integrated chips and feature networking functions.

    Yeah, and the're also working on a way to colonize Mars, too.

    --


    "I'll just chip in a bit for RedHat: I actually have that installed on my university machine." - Linus, '95
    1. Re:Huh?? by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      What does this new OS provide that we don't already have and are not already capable of doing?

      It provides hype.

      Give a man a fish and he eats for one day. Teach him how to fish, and though he'll eat for a lifetime, he'll call you a miser for not giving him your fish.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    2. Re:Huh?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also via X-10 hardware we can control just about anything from our PCs -- including air conditioners. The problem isn't availability, it's just that most people don't really need to control their microwave or other hosehold devices/appliances from their computer.

      Does anyone want to buy anything from X-10 after all those annoying ads?

    3. Re:Huh?? by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      most people don't really need to control their microwave or other hosehold devices/appliances from their computer.

      People do need this! They just don't realize it. And a TV has important advantages over the computer. Like this:

      Put food in micro, run to TV, interrupt viewers, fumble with menus, viewers get impatient, keep fumbling, lots of arguments and gestures, finally find menu to start micro, viewers chase you away. After a while micro beeps "ready", again interrupt viewers, fumble with menus, viewers almost get violent, finally find menu to open micro door, again get chased away. Run to micro and take food.

      People don't realize it, but most of us sit still far too much. This invention will help us get badly needed exercise.

      Give a man a fish and he eats for one day. Teach him how to fish, and though he'll eat for a lifetime, he'll call you a miser for not giving him your fish.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    4. Re:Huh?? by Erris · · Score: 2
      What does this new OS provide that we don't already have and are not already capable of doing?

      Hopefully you will be able to do all of those things without paying an huge fee every two years to M$ and buying a new computer. Sure, you can do these things with free tools now but people don't seem to be willing to take the time to do it. These new masters may make it easier for those who do not want to be free.

      --
      DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    5. Re:Huh?? by MadAndy · · Score: 1
      Yep, you can watch telly and view your computer's monitor on TV, even watch DVDs and control devices from your computer. Out of the box, this can only be done on Windows. Linux can do it, but only with a lot of work (been there).

      What they're probably after is a standard that could cover EVERYTHING, out of the box, plug and play. This currently exists. Unfortunately that's controlled by the last oufit they'd want in charge: Microsoft. MS aren't known for playing ball (but then nor is Sony!). Every time you use an MS product you give them more control.

      Not to mention all of the baggage MS's incessant drive for integration gives us, as we've seen repeatedly over the past few months. Who can be sure of what other issues remain, caused by something you'll never used that is linked to the core system? I wouldn't want to release that in my new VCR or TV, so they'd probably want to engineer something from the ground up to be as simple and secure as possible.

      They could theoretically fork off a copy of linux, but there's still the GPL to contend with, which causes major problems with the integration of patented or licensed technologies. Sure patents and closed licensing is bad, but they're still going to need to do it. Technology vendors that won't (or can't) release the source to their driver software can't support a Linux-based system properly, as the drivers are out of date as soon as the next kernel release comes along. Even when you have the source, recompiling it is something no consumer should need to do.

      Not to mention some people (whether right or wrong) would consider keeping the source to some new OS closed (or away from MS at least!) a benefit.

      As to whether anything will come of this is anybody's guess, but it's certainly true that for some embedded applications the current set of offerings out there aren't particularly palatable.

    6. Re:Huh?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      it's just that most people don't really need to control their microwave or other hosehold devices/appliances from their computer

      Hosehold devices/appliances? Is it just my imagination, or is that dirty? And, if it is, where can I get said devices. I want to control them from my computer!

    7. Re:Huh?? by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

      I would also think the three huge companies mentioned -- IBM, Toshiba, and Sony wouldn't work together anyway On the contrary. I'm working as an IBM employee somewhere you may have heard of. Turns out, Sony, Toshiba and IBM each have different skills and needs that together strengthen a project. Sure, we each have our agendas, but as long as we all get what we want, it's all good, right? None of us is out to dominate the world. We each have our target markets, and I think we can all coexist. I can't say anything about the OS article, but the hadware will be cool.

    8. Re:Huh?? by hyrdra · · Score: 3, Informative

      You should note that X10.com is a company, while X-10 is a protocol, which (albeit patented and requiring royalty) other companies sell as well. NEVER buy from that horrid X10.com company -- buy from Home Automation instead.

      It's bad what some companies do and then an entire technology gets a bad taste because of it...

      --


      "I'll just chip in a bit for RedHat: I actually have that installed on my university machine." - Linus, '95
    9. Re:Huh?? by seann · · Score: 0

      It does not take alot of work to watch TV on your monitor, or your monitor on TV using linux.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    10. Re:Huh?? by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      That's just what I was thinking. By the time they come out with it, it'll be obsolete, since the technology and products exists today.

      For argument sake, I wonder why they aren't using OS/2 as a base? It's pretty much abandoned anyway, as far as a customer solution.

      A good point someone else made is that Linux is too open. That's probably the main reason they aren't going to use it as a base. I don't like the idea of Sony being involved as one of the big three, as digital rights management is most definitely in their sights for the future. I dare not speculate as to what else...

  14. yomiuri by shoganainaa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    don't forget the source of this info either.
    The Daily Yomiuri is the Japanese equivalent of the New York Post. Big flashy stories for the masses but mostly sensationalized.

    --
    ----- shoganainaa
    1. Re:yomiuri by macshit · · Score: 2, Interesting
      No it's not.

      It's more like, oh, say, the pittsburgh press -- boring, a bit lightweight, and sometimes annoyingly conservative, but basically solid.

      I'd describe the various Japanese English-language dailies like this:
      • The Japan Times - The biggest, I'm not sure why. Seems to hire anyone who can write in English, and clearly written by and for expatriates. A typical editorial is something like `We Think Beer is Good.'
      • The Daily Yomiuri - Like I said above, somewhat boring, but seems more like a real newspaper (presumably because they can borrow resources from their parent newspaper). Occasionally has suspicious articles touting various Yomiuri-connected events.
      • The Asahi Evening News - Not that bad generally, but occasionally bat-wing loony (like a huge front-page article praising Imelda Marcos to high heaven).

      None of them are great, but none of them is horrible. I'd go so far to say that the Daily Yomiuri is the least bad of the bunch.

      [Note - I gave up reading any of these about a year ago, so perhaps they've all changed in the meantime.]
      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
  15. PS2 & Linux. by EnglishTim · · Score: 4, Informative

    The PS2 does not run any form of Linux.
    However, Linux is used on the PS2 Dev kits for developing games. (The PS2 Dev kits are effectively PCs with a built-in PS2 - the dev kits emulates the DVD/CDROM etc... if needed)

    1. Re:PS2 & Linux. by CatherineCornelius · · Score: 1
      The PS2 does not run any form of Linux.

      A Linux Kit is available for the PS2 in Japan. Sony has canvased users recently to find whether there would be demand for a similar kit in Europe and North America.

    2. Re:PS2 & Linux. by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 1

      Linux is ported to the PS2 platform, therefore you _can_ in fact run Linux on a PS2 itself.

      --
      Brian Fundakowski Feldman
    3. Re:PS2 & Linux. by NeuroMorphus · · Score: 1

      Yes, can officially purchase a Linux-enabled PS2!! (Not to mention you can run it on the Dreamcast as well). Xmms runs nicely I might add.

      --

      python >>>
      reduce(lambda x,y:x+y,map(lambda x:chr(ord(x)^42),tuple('zS^BED\nX_FOY\x0b')))
    4. Re:PS2 & Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any further information of where
      I can buy this kit in the US?
      I've seen evidence or the intent to
      sell the kit here(US) but have yet
      to see a concrete place to drop my
      money in exchange for it.

  16. Huge tuners !!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "TVs with the OS installed will be much smaller as they will not need a tuner, the sources said."

    And we all know how huge TV-tuner-modules are.
    At least several cubic centimeters !

    1. Re:Huge tuners !!?? by TarpaKungs · · Score: 1

      Quality journalism again...

      Someone mod up the parent - it's a good point.
      My TV tuner is about 10x6x1.bit centimeters.
      Sooo massssive.

      And you'll be needing a tuner somewhere unless you want to rely on broadband delivery(??)

      --
      Why can't women be like Hedy Lamarr - beautiful, talented and inventors of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum techn
    2. Re:Huge tuners !!?? by rtaylor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Realizing it was intended to be a joke it should be noted that several cubic centimeters can not be easily pushed into something the size of a PDA or cell phone with all the other stuff in the same package.

      I'm picturing something like a portable TIVO or IPod for video with a 3inch to 7inch display.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    3. Re:Huge tuners !!?? by yeOldeSkeptic · · Score: 1

      > Realizing it was intended to be a joke it should be noted that several > cubic centimeters can not be easily pushed into something the size of > a PDA or cell phone with all the other stuff in the same package. > I'm picturing something like a portable TIVO or IPod for video with a ... The reason tuners are so big is because your fingers have to be able to select the channels. I think it's quite possible to have really small tuner circuits by using ASICs.

  17. Plusses and minuses. by Alien54 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Probably would dispense with a gui for most applications. get rid of all that overhead. Especially since the peripheral device (tv, vcr, etc) would supply its own interface. But we have this:
    According to the sources, local area networks will be used to connect PCs installed with the operating system to TVs, air conditioners, refrigerators and other home appliances, giving great flexibility in controlling home appliances. But we also have this

    Strangely this ties in well with the comments I made (1, 2) on the X Box sequel story The possibility of abuse of any technology has to be watched. This story on the Whitdot website reveals one aspect of business leaders trying to use technology to their advantadge.

    There are many advantadges to this technology, but there is the flip side of this.

    For example, the X-Box sequel fits nicely into this kind of setup. And obviously MS wants to be in this market. Do you trust Microsoft?

    Actually, it is more a matter of the advatadges of the technology vs your trust or lack of trust for the big corporations. Which gets us into the whole Anti Globalist thing. I am not so sure of that as well. It spins out of control into a flame war of the evils of technology vs the evils of no technology really fast.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  18. Interesting... by A+Commentor · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...developing a new operating system (OS) to be released in 2005 for computers capable of high-speed Internet connections...

    Ok, 3-4 years(depending on when in 2005 it's released) of development for a new OS. But what is it going to provide...
    ...OS would allow personal computers and home appliances to exchange huge volumes of data, including the high-resolution graphics of a television screen, through a broadband connection.

    Current OSs can transfer large amounts of data, it's the broadband connections that are lagging behind... My P-90 can easily handle the 128Kb/s uplink my DSL provides... And the number of people paying for Broadband is not increasing at the rate everyone expected... The research needs to be how to get faster broadband at a cheaper price.
    According to the sources, the firms intend to make the source code of the finished OS available to other companies ...

    Even though this looks like open source, they have worded it carefully: 'to other companies', doesn't say 'free' so it could be available to other companies at a price that no individuals could afford it.
    Users will be able to store television programs in their PCs and watch them at any time and any place.

    Doubtful Sony would allow something like that, without charging a arm-and-leg for it...
    --

    Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    1. Re:Interesting... by pointym5 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Doubtful Sony would allow something like that, without charging a arm-and-leg for it...


      DRM! It's so freaking obvious. It's all about a world where everything is cryptographically secured so that the delivery of copyrighted material - the whole experience - can be controlled by the copyright holder.
    2. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Doubtful Sony would allow something like that, without charging a arm-and-leg for it...

      Well, as a matter of fact Sony sells TiVo and ReplayTV units. Both of which can "store television programs."

    3. Re:Interesting... by goatboy_14 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And the number of people paying for Broadband is not increasing at the rate everyone expected... The research needs to be how to get faster broadband at a cheaper price.
      This is the only thing I disagree with in you're post. As I see it, it's availability, not speed that's keeping broadband away from most people. How far can a DSL or cable signal go from your local telco now, one mile, two? For the other 80% of the world (which unfortunatly includes me), we are stuck with crappy dialup connections. I really feal people need to wake up already and stop researching faster connections and research how to get more distaince for their existing speeds. I would gladly pay $50/mo for a 256k connection and a ping under 75ms. But alas, that's not available in my area. v_v

      (Please forgive me for going completely off topic and rambeling on, it's really late here and I'm about to recover from an all nighter pinging at ~500ms. sigh.)
    4. Re:Interesting... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1, Troll
      I really feal people need to wake up already and stop researching faster connections and research how to get more distaince for their existing speeds. I would gladly pay $50/mo for a 256k connection and a ping under 75ms. But alas, that's not available in my area.
      Well, if you chose to live in the boondocks, and drive your climate-warming SUV to go get a quart of milk, you certainly can't expect to have the convenience of a high-speed connection that would be available to you if you chose instead to live in the city.

      Just because you're an anglo-saxon with their typical cultural bias against city-living doesn't mean you can have your cake and eat it, too.

      It's either living in the City with a high-speed connection or up the sticks without.

    5. Re:Interesting... by kriston · · Score: 1

      Erm, my "climate-warming SUV" is ULEV certified.

      Bleah!

      --

      Kriston

  19. thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for pointing that out ;)

  20. Another OS? by rbeattie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Someone has to say it, so it might as well be me. Does the world need ANOTHER OS? Especially one that won't launch for another 3 years and will obviously be tied down to specific platforms, technologies and underlying agendas (Sony). How many different OS's can you think of off the top of your head already? And isn't IBM hard-core Linux now?

    According to the article, the OS will be able to run on PCs and be accessible from your TV (for the elderly the article says) and enable tasks impossible using current technology. Like WHAT? What can a whole new OS provide that 3 years of development on the Linix kernel or some other existing OS can't? Or is this $400,000,000 to recreate the wheel?

    2005: I get to use Microsoft at work, Linux on my web server, Simbian on my phone and some other random Sony OS on my television... joy.

    -Russ

    Man - did I wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning or what...

    --
    Me
    1. Re:Another OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Would you prefer Symbian at work, Microsoft on your web server, Sony on your phone and some other random Linux OS on your television...

      Different OS's for different jobs. Or we could just have Microsoft on everything.

  21. here it is. by willum448 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    New OS would link PCs, gadgets

    Yomiuri Shimbun

    Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. (SCE), Toshiba Corp. and IBM Corp. have reached a basic agreement on jointly developing a new operating system (OS) to be released in 2005 for computers capable of high-speed Internet connections, industry sources said Friday.

    The OS would allow personal computers and home appliances to exchange huge volumes of data, including the high-resolution graphics of a television screen, through a broadband connection.

    Users would also be able to control their home appliances via PC, and watch television programs and movies on their PC at any location.

    According to the sources, the firms intend to make the source code of the finished OS available to other companies in an attempt to make it the global standard of the anticipated high-speed Internet age.

    SCE will bring to the project software development skills honed through its work on two PlayStation video game consoles and their attendant software. Toshiba and IBM will provide semiconductor and computer manufacturing expertise.

    Work on the OS project has not yet begun, but the three companies have begun joint development of next-generation semiconductors that will be hundreds of times faster than current integrated chips and feature networking functions.

    The three companies predict the entire development cost will run to about 400 million dollars (52 billion yen).

    According to the sources, local area networks will be used to connect PCs installed with the operating system to TVs, air conditioners, refrigerators and other home appliances, giving great flexibility in controlling home appliances.

    The larger bandwidth of a broadband connection will open the door to the downloading of movies, TV programs and video games via the Internet, the sources said.

    Users will be able to store television programs in their PCs and watch them at any time and any place.

    TVs with the OS installed will be much smaller as they will not need a tuner, the sources said.

    All controls will be accessible from the TV screen, making the system more user-friendly, the sources said, an important feature when considering the elderly and those unfamiliar with using PCs.

    The OS will also enable tasks impossible for current technology, the sources said.

    1. Re:here it is. by ksheff · · Score: 2

      According to the sources, the firms intend to make the source code of the finished OS available to other companies in an attempt to make it the global standard of the anticipated high-speed Internet age.

      If they are going to do that, why not just spend the $400 million on adding the needed features to linux? They would already start out with a good system that many people already are familiar with and the GPL would insure that the source would be available. This would satisfy their goals unless they wanted to sell the licenses to the source code and be able to restrict it to those who paid for it. If they wanted to do that, they could just take one of the BSD systems and do the same thing. Why create a whole new system from scratch when systems already exist that do most of what they want but may be a litte rough around the edges? Leverage the work that others have already done and is freely available and spend your money polishing it up. IMHO, that's basically what Apple did with OS X.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    2. Re:here it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why didn't they throw 400 million dollars at Linux. Maybe because Linux is crap?

    3. Re:here it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IBM supposedly was going to invest $1billion in linux too. Also, the poster also mentioned they could have used BSD for the same reasons. Is BSD crap too?

  22. Yes, High Resolution (high def!) by sheetzam · · Score: 1

    I am assuming they mean high definition, perhaps even 1080i, which is 1920x1080. I think just about anyone would call that high resolution Keep up if your going to comment.

    --
    "Actually, I enjoyed this in the same vague, horrible way I enjoyed the A-Team" P. Opus
  23. The source said? by randy_ch · · Score: 1

    But why can't I get the source?

  24. Why not extended VNC-based tech? by Tekmage · · Score: 2

    While it's nice and all to build a whole new OS to accomplish what they're trying to do, couldn't all they're trying to do be accomplished using existing VNC and streamed media technology?

    --
    --The more you know, the less you know.
  25. the OS so far is missing... by dollargonzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    well, first of all, they seem to be hiding something that the story is not telling us. all the things that they say an OS can do, so can linux and windows and just about every other mature OS on the market today.

    if they were developing a new OS, they need to do one thing: the thing that makes the Palm different from the Newton: all data is integrated into the OS, making it very easy to communicate between different programs. that is what most OSs lack. it is very difficult to make programs communicate with each other, except maybe with FIFO files that take up extra space. it is not really possible for one program to write in the memory of another. sure that is 3V1L for desktop and server OSs b/c they are VERY vulnerable, but its perfect for an OS that is supposed to communicate with appliances.

    Now, if you have been thinking to mod me down because I did not mention grep on unix..wait right there! grep is a great tool, but it still has its extents. you cannot do everything with grep. programs can use each other's data (making it very useful for doing complicated tasks via simple programs) but they cannot in the full sense of the word intercommunicate. most importantly, grep is essentially a one way connection.

    QED

    --
    BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    1. Re:the OS so far is missing... by dollargonzo · · Score: 1

      also, just another thought: even with all the stuff that was mentioned...couldn't the integration of data (a server with a rigid protocol of some sort) be run on TOP of the kernel. so, use the linux kernel, and instead of spending precious money (400 million) and time (it'll take a while) developing a new kernel, use what exists and instead spend your time on writing a server that allows for programs to communicate better that runs on top of imbedded linux.

      QED

      --
      BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    2. Re:the OS so far is missing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just imagine what a from scracth interpretation of OS' would bring. BeOs was only a taste of things to come. Pervasive multi-threading, transparent SMP.

      Squeal!

    3. Re:the OS so far is missing... by Ayende+Rahien · · Score: 2

      What is wrong with using sockets to communicate between applications?
      On NT, you've pipes (not the normal ones you get in CLI) that allows bi-directional data transfer from application in an easy and fast way.

      --

      --
      Two witches watched two watches.
      Which witch watched which watch?
    4. Re:the OS so far is missing... by GroovBird · · Score: 1

      I don't think it is wise to let one process write in the memory of another process. The whole purpose of process isolation is to keep a system from going down just because one process is doing stuff it isn't supposed to.

      Besides, you're very inaccurate. There are many ways for processes to communicate other than FIFO files (which are, I believe, better suited for having a daemon communicate with any process)

      - you have sockets
      - you have pipes in win32
      - you have shared memory on both platforms. This is exactly what you want to have, but it must be heavily protected by semaphores and critical sections, and this SHOULD be done, not for reasons of missing functionality of the OS.
      - applications on windows are heavily based on COM for uhmm... let's say more than three years now. The technology exists for longer than that.

      Simply stating that process isolation is only meant on the desktop and not on palm-sized devices is entirely incorrect: only when you have a multitasking device in which you write and test all of the software YOURSELF (i.e. embedded or realtime software) you can do whatever you want, but everywhere else isolation is a good thing!

      Dave

  26. Re:B***x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    somehow i think not ...
    would sony license stuff of microsoft when there is
    going to be a war of consoles between xbox & ps2 ...
    I think not ...
    If you read that article they are saying that they are going to be very open with the new os, you can bet your bottom dollar linux or a derivative is the way this things going ...

  27. A multitude of OS:s by adadun · · Score: 5, Insightful
    2005: I get to use Microsoft at work, Linux on my web server, Simbian on my phone and some other random Sony OS on my television... joy.
    Most people unknowingly use a multitude of operating systems in their daily lives, even today. They use OSE on their cellphone, RTXC on their microwave oven, pSOS in their car's control system, RTEMS in their stereo system, vxWorks in their dishwasher and perhaps even Linux in their VCR. Almost every device we use today is equipped with embedded small computers and they all run different operating systems.

    We shouldn't be striving for a "standard" OS in all those appliences. (Who would want to run Windows in their embedded systems anyway? Yes, Microsoft would probably succeed in making Windows the standard OS in such a case...) We should be setting standards for exchanging data between those systems instead.

    TCP/IP is a good carrier of the information exchange - the global Internet has proven that. But service discovery, naming and security are issues that needs to be delt with. Hopefully, this will be developed out in the open just like the Internet protocols once were developed and not beind closed doors, patents and intelectual property lock-ins.
    1. Re:A multitude of OS:s by rbeattie · · Score: 2

      You're right, we don't need one system for everything (I was just whinging in that last part).

      But my point is we have an abundance of OS's for every conceivable niche already. Why not strive to make these systems better instead of adding yet another OS to interop with? The magic of TCP/IP and maybe XML is all well and good, but every new OS expands the problems of interchange between systems exponentially. And Sony? I doubt words like "open" and "free" are in their vocabulary, let alone their new OS.

      -R

      --
      Me
    2. Re:A multitude of OS:s by chaih · · Score: 1
      We should be setting standards for exchanging data between those systems instead

      To establish a standard we first need to make sure inputs are sought from all parties involved and the standardization process is transparent to the public.
      Now the problem is some big companies are not willing to abide by an 'open' standard, instead, they close the door and just create a proprietary standard so that everyone who uses it will have to pay(either directly or indirectly). That is true users who don't want to adopt can create their own standard, but as long as those companies don't give in, this doesn't solve the heterogeneity problem. Micro$oft comes in mind when I am saying this.
    3. Re:A multitude of OS:s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We shouldn't be striving for a "standard" OS in all those appliences. (Who would want to run Windows in their embedded systems anyway? Yes, Microsoft would probably succeed in making Windows the standard OS in such a case...) We should be setting standards for exchanging data between those systems instead.

      Microsoft has such a standard: UPnP (Universal Plug n Play). I'm not sure what other standards exist, but the point is, to add to your point that we don't need another OS, we don't even need another standard. If I am not mistaken, UPnP works over TCP among other things.

      And not to burst anyone's bubble, but Microsoft partners with other companies. In fact, IBM, Sony, and Sun are all members of the Universal Plug n Play forum. See: http://www.upnp.org/membership/members.asp. The point is that you guys are missing the point. The PS3, the MS HomeStation whenever it comes to fruition, the XBox, and many consumer devices (among them Sony and IBM and Sun products) should be able to communicate over this protocol. Large corporations aren't full of dumb people who don't get it, and Large corporations need to partner with other corporations, even their competitors, to add value to their products.

      Most of the posts so far in this thread are of the form: Large Corporation = Evil. Well, I work for one of those large corporations, and we're not focused on taking over the world, we're focused on delivering a product that enhances the life of people.

    4. Re:A multitude of OS:s by HiThere · · Score: 2

      The purposes of the technical groups do not necessarily align with the purposes of the corporate management. And if they feel you wouldn't approve, they're likely to just not bother to tell you.

      I don't believe that everyone working for, say, Monsanto, is evil. But the corporation is anyway. They've appearantly been killing people for decades. With foreknowledge that their actions would have this effect. And their main reaction has been to try to hide the evidence. I really doubt that most people who work for Monsanto were ever informed about what the company was doing. They probably wouldn't believe it now (though the denial would cause extreme cognitive dissonance, given the evidence).

      Of course, there isn't any evidence that all corporations are as bad as this. One really hopes that they aren't. But as they inevitably hide the evidence as well as they can ... how can one know them innocent?

      Now I wouldn't want to claim that the company that you work for is one of the bad ones. I hope that it isn't. But most of the evidence that is available indicates that the upper management of the larger corporations is actively engaged in subverting laws and stiffling competition. And that they consider this "good business". The attitude that you comment about is the natural, even the restrained, result of their arrogance and immorality.
      .

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  28. PS2 *DOES* officially run Linux! by Space+cowboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... but only in Japanese for now (see http://www.ps2linux.com/)

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  29. X-10 doesn't cut it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    X-10 is the bottom of the barrel for home automation. Doesn't have a lot of control options other than on/off up/down type of control. All the other automation stuff you see is usually done over dedication lines with other protocols.

    X-10 insn't what they are looking for. Heck I outgrew x-10 years ago

    1. Re:X-10 doesn't cut it by sjames · · Score: 2

      X-10 insn't what they are looking for. Heck I outgrew x-10 years ago

      X10 definatly has it's limitations, but it's not at all bad for playing around with. It's very cheap, and doesn't require running wires through all the walls.

      Sadly, it COULD be an excellent system if 2-way devices didn't all cost many times the proce of an equivilant 1-way device.

      on/off, up/down isn't too bad with creative mapping. I use my X10 remote and a perl script to control xmms + the lights.

      Of course, if I had time or was building a new house, I'd just run extra cat5 and be done with it.

  30. geesh by Dukebytes · · Score: 1
    Ok - I'm kind of surprised that IBM would even be involved with this. IBM could write this themselves - if there was any kind of need for it at all. Sony is looking to expand the PS2 platform for sure (could help them) - but Toshiba??? - these guys can't even get their "computer products" web site to work right.

    No kidding - go try and configure a server from their web site - won't happen. And their eq sucks - period. I'm not really trying to troll them - but it has been very painful working with their stuff - trust me. You want them to write an OS for ya???

    AND why oh why does everone thing that I need to watch TV (aka - boob tube) on my PC and my Ipaq and my laptop and my tablet PC or whatever you happen to be using - in my car, in the shitter, outside playing with the kid - gods.... I hardly watch TV on my TV - and have never on anything else... I don't have tivo (spelling?) or any of that crap - and I bet most people do not either - its just not that important.

    What is this going to do for ANYBODY in any kind of major market?

    Not to mention the fact that "Broadband" is a wet dream at this point in time for most people. And I don't really see this picking up that much over the next 3 years or so.

    Maybe its me - but I just don't get it.

    --

    FreeBSD: Nothing runs like a daemon with a pitch fork.
    1. Re:geesh by ksheff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      According to the story, Sony is going to be writing the OS. IBM and Toshiba are going to be making the chips. I believe IBM makes the cpus for the GameCube, so it would be somewhat funny to have the guts of competing game consoles come from the same factory. IBM probably doesn't care what OS Sony runs on it as long as it helps keeps their chip plants running at capacity.

      I hardly ever watch TV anymore too. I'm not interested in the programs being aired and I'm busy doing other things. However, for many other people, the home entertainment center is the focal point of life inside their home. It's practically all they do after they get home from work. I have a brother and sister (both 30 or over) that you can't even talk to if they are watching TV. The TV has 100% of their attention and to have a conversation with them, you have to turn it off or physically block the view of the screen. It's like when they watch TV, they go into a trance. Adults and kids like these are the ones that Sony & Co are gunning the latest and greatest TV equipment for.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    2. Re:geesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IBM and Toshiba are doing the hardware stuff.

    3. Re:geesh by Techi · · Score: 1

      From how the article described the OS and the companies that are working on it, I would find it reasonable to assume that Toshiba is going to provide the hardware...something that, in my experience, they have been sensationally good at. I do completely agree with your point about TV. The only reason I watch TV at all is because I get free pay per view. Everything on television has become a copy of a copy of a copy of a sitcom. I do, however, know someone who has a TiVO, and he isn't using it to be a TiVO...he's using it for temporary data storage and backups. I think the main thing Sony and Microsoft want out of this is a Digital Rights Management OS that people will be less likely to crack, as it is being completely restructured. All of this, of course, has already been mentioned, but I think the public will buy into this, just like they did with ME, and XP...etc... When it comes out, they'll just advertise it as the new alternative to bluetooth. The direction of the technology market is determined entirely by those that know nothing about the technology in the first place. Pity...

      --
      "You think that's air you're breathing now?"
  31. And why not? by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 3, Funny


    "When Sony and IBM get together it means nothing but trouble"..

    Careful, you might upset YRO readers. Times are tough -- and theres only so much tinfoil to go around, you know.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  32. compatability by signore+pablo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The only good thing to come out of Microsoft as a monopoly is that many devices follow their "standard". Yes, it is true that Microsoft ignores industry standards, but at least they create a conformity that allows many devices to work together without too much of a problem.
    Look at the cell phone market in the United States and you will see what a hinderance lack of standards can be. The US is very far behind in cell phone techonology with regards to many other nations, and mostly because of big companies each willing to push their own proprietary technology because they believe they will be profiting more in the long run.
    Well, back to the new OS, what's gonna happen here? The description of services offered, control their home appliances via PC, and watch television programs and movies on their PC at any location , sound great, but how are Microsoft and even Apple gonna react to this? They obviously both want a piece of that market share and I'm not sure if they are all willing to conform to each others standards.
    Ideally, every company would be small and would have to follow industry standards. These standards would be imposed by a legislation with representation from all the developers. Instead what we get is a couple people fighting like babies over who will dictate the future standard. No one wins, and technology gets screwed.

    1. Re:compatability by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Wow. Like Samba? Last I checked, MS re-implemented their SMB protocol slightly differently each time they released a new version of Windows. I'm sorry, but I have no respect for MS standards in the industry, because it is obvious that they can't even set standards within their own company.

    2. Re:compatability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the cell phone market in the United States and you will see what a hinderance lack of standards can be. The US is very far behind in cell phone techonology with regards to many other nations, and mostly because of big companies each willing to push their own proprietary technology because they believe they will be profiting more in the long run. This is one area where government intervention has actually helped here in Europe. The sheer fact that noone has been able to get a license to operate anything but GSM (in its 900 and 1800 incarnations) has ensured a common standard throughout the European Union (and well beyond). The result is that there is a lot of mobile communications R&D taking place especially in the Scandinavian countries, and many users here are early adopters of e.g. packet switched mobile networks (GPRS). More than one operator per country has kept prices relatively low, however communications across borders is still much too expensive.

    3. Re:compatability by h0mi · · Score: 1

      "Look at the cell phone market in the United States and you will see what a hinderance lack of standards can be. The US is very far behind in cell phone techonology with regards to many other nations, and mostly because of big companies each willing to push their own proprietary technology because they believe they will be profiting more in the long run."

      The "technology" that we are "behind" regarding cell phones involves using cell phones to do things other than talk. Things that most Americans do not seem to be too interested in.

      As long as I can make a phone call when and where I need to, I don't need SMS text messaging, or the like on my phone, thank you. I don't want clipped web pages on my phone, draining my batteries even more or costing me that much more money.

  33. Along the lines of Ubicomp / Calm Tech. by ascii · · Score: 1

    This kinda sounds like Bill Buxton and Mark Weisers thoughts on Ubiquitous Computing and Calm Technology.

    Then one can look upon this new OS as an alternative to the .Net strategy in that the latter concentrates on providing services confined within a computer (with the slight modification of the TabletPC which is by all means Weiser and Buxtons inventions at Xerox aswell) while the former sorta reaches beyond the computer itself and further into the real world.

    I think this is a healthy step and hopefully one that will help decentralize computing. Personally I'd love to be able to do computerstuff in a much more casual and relaxed fashion than what's possible today.

    My two cents anyway.

    --
    naah sig schmig
  34. Doomed from the start? by Phil+Wherry · · Score: 5, Informative
    While nothing's 100% certain, history suggests that efforts like this might have difficulty achieving success.

    There have been a number of fairly spectacular failures in this arena. Consider, for example:
    • Taligent. This was an Apple-HP-IBM joint venture aimed at developing operating system software. Four years passed, and much money was spent. Much hype was produced, but I don't think they ever shipped a product.
    • Kaleida. This was an Apple-IBM joint venture aimed at developing (yep!) operating system software. No product resulted.
    • OS/2. This one's a little different since a product (and, for that matter, a pretty good one) resulted. But pride-of-ownership and internal competition issues killed the product anyway.

    Software development successes seem to start with a small team who understand the position and purpose of the product. Once that's achieved, then the team can scale up. I'd be concerned that the three companies behind this announcement are likely to have difficulty assembling an appropriately small and well-focused core team.
    1. Re:Doomed from the start? by BlueGecko · · Score: 1

      Taligent became reborn as the OO C++ frameworks that power (among other things) VisualAge, and so has been extensively used by OS/2 and AIX developers. They're actually very nice frameworks, unmatched by anything except OpenStep (although Java is gradually improving to that point). I believe IBM and Apple were also able to reuse some of Taligent's technology in the development of OpenDoc. So while it never really materialized into a full operating system, massive portions of Taligent did live on.

      Kaleida, meanwhile, was not system software. Its function was almost identical to that of Macromedia Director. Furthermore, Kaleida was finished, and released as a product called ScriptX. The only problem was that, by that time, Macromedia Director had been out long enough to saturate the market, leading ScriptX to a quick and untimely demise as it found no buyers.

      Your overall point's fine, but I thought it worth pointing out that two of those three technologies lived on well after their death and one was not system software.

    2. Re:Doomed from the start? by sebol · · Score: 1

      Look at different angle

      >* Taligent. This was an Apple-HP-IBM joint venture
      three of them, already have OS.
      failed...

      >* Kaleida. This was an Apple-IBM
      same guys too, already have OS

      they dont REALLY need OS.
      failed...

      but SONY and Toshiba doesnt have OS.
      they might need OR REALLY need one

      --
      -- Hasbullah bin Pit (sebol)
    3. Re:Doomed from the start? by stripes · · Score: 2
      There have been a number of fairly spectacular failures in this arena. Consider, for example

      You forgot OSF/1 which was more or less "All Unix venders except Sun and AT&T vs. Sun and AT&T". It was a failure in that only DEC really used it, and even there it appears dead now.

      Of corse there is also Solaris which was really a joint design Sun and AT&T, but not really the same as the others since AT&T never intended to use it, and never announced that they would. It is a failure in that it sucks :-), on the other hand it is a raging commercial success, or at least the closes Unix has to one.

      It's hard to imagine how much farther along they would be if they had stuck to the path they are on with SunOS4, at least technically. Politically they got more business support, so maybe if they hadn't gone the way the did they might not be the dominant Unix player...that still doesn't make me like Solaris though.

      I can't think of any commercially successful joint venture OSes...but, wasn't Multics a joint venture? Not commercially successful by a long shot, but very very influential...

    4. Re:Doomed from the start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had Taligent lived as an OS it would have had heritage in common with OSF. How so?

      Pink was originally hosted on its own microkernel, Opus. IBM sledgehammered Taligent to use the IBM Microkernel, which was Mach 3.0 with modifications from OSF/RI. IBM screwed themselves and Taligent up so badly, Taligent considered switching completely to the OSF/RI Microkernel, which was Mach 3.0 with modifications.

      But, alas, IBM was the touch of death.

  35. Don't we have enough OS's already? by WildBeast · · Score: 1

    I really don't think that this is good for developers, it'll decrease their value a lot, soon their wages will be pretty cheap. We've got more than enough OS's out there and a pretty huge collection of software to choose from.

    1. Re:Don't we have enough OS's already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I disagree. I think that we need more OS's. The Microsoft hegemony and the 'back to the future' Linux are stifiling the development of new OS technology.

      We need new blood, not stagnation.

    2. Re:Don't we have enough OS's already? by screwtheNSA · · Score: 0

      Enough, sure, but how about 10 more? ^Time to build a few emulators that replace the eprom and roms...playstations accessed remotely via RS232/TTL, and it'll be up;oadable from your palm as well, really, any PDA would be fine. This is a tale of untruths, but fantasies DO have a way of taking shape(see current elected prez.). INSOMNIA IS SIMPLY MIND OVER MATTRESS!

      --
      206.39.38.2, DDN-BLK-36, DOD NET INFO CENTER. 800.365.3642 206.36.0.0-206.39.255.255 NET RANGE.
  36. Bwah-ha-ha-ha-hah! by Erris · · Score: 2
    It looks to me like they want something with Digital Rights Management, but don't want to work with Microsoft (and Linux is too open). Evil.

    Evil vrs Evil. As they fight and splinter their standards those who co-operate most with all shall win. What vendor would dare diss the three challengers of the M$ Domination? They shall be everywhere and their stuff will work and it will be better than M$ psuedo standards like AVI. The greedheads will punish each other.

    Digital Rights Management, that is more disturbing. We know they want to put it in hardware. That M$ will also pay toll to the new trolls is cold comfort if such stuff is used as the thin wedge of a legislative attack on general computing with hardware backing it up.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  37. IBM + Toshiba + Sony does make sense. . . by cgleba · · Score: 1

    > IBM, Toshiba, and Sony wouldn't work together anyway

    It's definately in IBM's interest:

    [from the article]:
    > TVs with the OS installed will be much
    > smaller as they will not need a tuner, the
    > sources said.

    How are they to battle the monopoly-leverage that the MS HomeStation will have? Built it into the TV -- and they need the big TV makers Sony and Toshiba to pull it off.

    Sony and Toshiba probably like it because they will get cheap chips and ASICs from IBM. If I remeber correctly there are a few IBM chips in the PS2. . .

    This atricle is vaporware and hype, however the partnership is actually very logical and this does seem plausible. . .

    A few years ago I wuld have never guessed these bed partners, though. . .

    1. Re:IBM + Toshiba + Sony does make sense. . . by spectral · · Score: 1

      how large can the tuner be, compared to anything that can run this full OS? there's a tv tuner, dvd decoder, 3d graphics chip, firewire interface, etc. all on one single agp card right now. I can't imagine that all of the tv's electronics could therefore be all that large to begin with.. you figure laptops, if you remove the drives, keyboard, screen, etc. still have enough tech in them to drive an AGP card (just not the right plug).. and much more stuff you won't need (keyboard interface, i/o controllers, 900mhz mobile processors, etc.).. ?

  38. Ah hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>The OS will also enable tasks impossible for current technology, the sources said

    In other words...an OS that doesn't BSOD daily ;-)

  39. Hard to Hack? by peterdaly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If they build the OS from the ground up, it may take a lot longer to hack the thing then say, a Tivo for instance. While Tivo has been cool about it, I'm sure that Sony doesn't want that to happent to them if they can help it.

    While it is easy to hack into a Tivo, one of the reasons is bacause it runs a common user OS. Openness was one of the reason Tivo has had a fairly low cost to get into the market. Sony doesn't care about cost in an instance that this. I bet they were sitting around some conference room talking about how they want PC like features, but not PC like hackability. Some bright guy threw out, "well, we just make our own OS then...the way we want it." Doesn't sound too far fetched to me. Don't have to allow console access from a serial port to configure...make you own serial protocol, command structure, serial cable connections, etc, etc. It is still hackable, but not by the average geek, even with instructions. Even if you do get into to some useful interface...what then?

    -Pete

    1. Re:Hard to Hack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It probably went more like this:

      Executive: Microsoft?

      Techie:Too expensive. And they will try to kill you.

      Executive: Line-ux?

      Techie: Too crusty.

      Executive:Well then it's settled.

      Businesses don't throw around 400 million dollar checks. Hackers don't even cross their radar.

    2. Re:Hard to Hack? by j1mmy · · Score: 1

      read the article. they claim the os will be open source. if that doesn't lend it to being hackable, i don't know what will.

  40. This should be a set of protocols and applications by originalhack · · Score: 1

    Why on earth would anyone (other than Micro$oft) design an OS for something where all of the substance is contained in the protocols?

    A new set of protocols for this sort of thing, suppoted by applications sold in appliances, set-top-boxes, and games and available on commercial and non-commercial software for a variety of OSs seems more like the right model for this.

  41. For Televisions by Perdo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sony sells a heck of a lot more TVs than playstations. Perhaps this new OS is aimed at the much more ubiqitious TV market. Combine that with IBM's support of CPRM. Welcome to pay-per-veiw tivo work-alike. Shure would make the MPAA Happy.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  42. Not new but maybe useful.. by MikeFM · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't know how many times when hauling my VCD, DVD, consoles, etc around that I've wished they could just jack into the local WiFi network and then the tv could pick the feed it wanted to receive by checking a 'Network Neighborhood' type of thing that looked just like picking a channel. You can send video over a WiFi network without any problems so all you need is a tv smart enough to receive it.

    Then to be even better they cold make the power cords optional so you could go 'unjacked' for a while and then just plug the system back in later to play/charge. The PS1 already has battery packs so why not DVD players and newer consoles. :)

    Not sure why they need a new OS for it. A simple protocol that agrees on the type of video stream and a way to communicate available channels should work. You could even offer encryption of streams if you wanted to make sure your kids couldn't see the porn your watching. Screw the $400 million. Someone hire me for a year and I'll develop it myself using Linux and standard embedded components. :)

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:Not new but maybe useful.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      've wished they could just jack into the local WiFi network and then the tv could pick the feed it wanted to receive by checking a 'Network Neighborhood' type of thing that looked just like picking a channel. You can send video over a WiFi network without any problems so all you need is a tv smart enough to receive it.

      Sounds just like JINI to me. Seems that Sun are way ahead of most people in this field.

  43. It already exists and it was called BeIA by bhima · · Score: 1

    BeIA has all of these features and a lot more, too bad no one was really looking while Microsoft quietly crushed any competition to their OS.

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    1. Re:It already exists and it was called BeIA by Xandis · · Score: 1

      Sony tried Be's offering and it failed miserably. BeIA/BeOS/BeWHATEVER, despite all of its nice features, had problems which doomed it.

      Believe you me; Sony, IBM, et al all had the opportunity to investigate and buy Be and save themselves 3+ years of development time --- obviously they didn't think Be was worth it.

    2. Re:It already exists and it was called BeIA by arielb · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sony themselves screwed it up by using a lame CPU and forcing it to rotate the screen at the same time.

      --
      ---
    3. Re:It already exists and it was called BeIA by bhima · · Score: 1

      The E-villa's failure is more indicative of the failure of the business models of network / internet appliance retailers, more so than the technology behind them: iOpener, epod, E-villa, Gateway Connected Touch Pad, whatever. I suppose that the techno-freaks (like ourselves) that would buy these things already have a decent connection.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  44. This story sheds light on compu-conservatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The line has been drawn. One camp says Microsoft/Linux is good enough god-damnit and should be ported to everything, destroy all competition. The other camp says we need an OS for every reasonable environment. It doesn't make snese to shoehorn Windows/Linux into your phone, so why do it?

    I may be a political conservative, but I'm a computer-Liberal.

  45. Sony Computer denies new OS deal by dwillyson · · Score: 1

    I read this denial way before slashdot posted the story. Seems some local newspapers are way ahead of slashdot.

    http://www.timesofindia.com/articleshow.asp?art_ id =306808047

    1. Re:Sony Computer denies new OS deal by pressman · · Score: 1

      Seems some local newspapers are way ahead of slashdot

      And there's something surprising about this?

      --
      Pooty tweet
  46. Multics II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3 companies get together to build the OS that will kill all others and be used in the home place displacing all the rest.
    Same Theme, New Partners. By 2005, I suspect that most ppl wll go with M$, BSD, or Linux.

  47. Re:This should be a set of protocols and applicati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - Why on earth would anyone (other than Micro$oft) design an OS for something where all of the substance is contained in the protocols?

    Because other than Microsoft means Linux (too open) and MacOS (Apple only). They want to make money out of closed products, so they will write their own closed OS.

  48. MSOFFICE!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it run MSoffice and Outlook express. If it does I will be willing to shift, otherwise .... no thanks.

  49. the BIG-BUGGER-TUNERS by el'gwato · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "TVs with the OS installed will be much smaller as they will not need a tuner, the sources said."
    Heh... I worked as a TV technician for a year or so while I was out of work, tuners were 6cm x 2cm then in new TV's.... I always thought it was the tube and gun that made them so bulky... :)

    --
    All speling, factual, tact, and/or grametical errers be the result of netwerk interpherance or# transmition ererrs.
  50. Hope at last! by be-fan · · Score: 2

    BeOS redux?

    PS> Great. But will it run UT?

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  51. Sounds like BeOS to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a new OS that 'would allow personal computers and home appliances to exchange huge volumes of data, including the high-resolution graphics of a television screen, through a broadband connection.'

    Isn't this what BeOS was supposed to do?

  52. In a related note... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1
    Users will be able to store television programs in their PCs and watch them at any time and any place.

    ...All the major television and film studios will file a lawsuit immediately if it doesn't contain built-in, unavoidable protection for their content.

    The sad paradox here being, of course, that if it DOES have the built-in, unavoidable protection, nobody will want it.
    --
    Who did what now?
  53. bandwidth *is* the problem by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    Current OSs can transfer large amounts of data, it's the broadband connections that are lagging behind... My P-90 can easily handle the 128Kb/s uplink my DSL provides... And the number of people paying for Broadband is not increasing at the rate everyone expected... The research needs to be how to get faster broadband at a cheaper price.

    The spread is even more than that. In 1994 we had two T1s to the internet via uunet. One was dedicated to our webserver... a P60 running Windows NT3.5 and Netscape Enterprise Webserver. About 75% of our content was static, but there was a good amount of CGIs and background tasks (email, dns, and ftp daemons). And yet, our P60 worked like a charm. Sure, we should have used Linux or maybe even Solaris on a SPARC, something a bit more suited to the task... but it worked, even when the T1 was fully saturated.

  54. I can see how the mistake was made ... by Big+Dogs+Cock · · Score: 2, Funny

    The person writing the story obviously got some out of date marketing material - fitting an ADSL modem into an MCA bus should indeed work on your PS/2.

    --
    "Under the iron bridge, we fist" - The Smiths, Still Ill
  55. And so it begins ... by kevina · · Score: 2, Interesting
    And so it begins (like it has not already) ...

    What the devil am I talking about, I am talking the the assault on our freedom and in particular the freedom of fair use.

    This device is precisely the thing the the media industries (The MPAA and RIAA to mention a few) want, a closed device to deliver content to the end user where they have complete control of what gets done with it. It is just one in a serious of steps, including the DMCA, which the media industries hope will eventually lead to this.

    Is it going to happen, NO. But are they going to try, most defiantly. There is a fundamental paradigm shift on our hand due to the Internet. The simple fact is that it is going to be imposable to control the flow of any sort of information. It has already happened with music and it is eventually going to happen with video and other forms of information. And there is nothing the media industries can due about it. Unfortunately the media industry doesn't really see this and those that due refuse to accept and will do everything in there power to make the Internet into what they want. And thus it is going to be hell. What we have seen already is just the begging of the storm. It is going to get a lot worse in the coming years as they media industry continue to try there tricks to control the free flow of information. If you do not see this conflict by now I fell very sorry for you as the signs are everywhere, the DMCA, the SSSCA, and Microsoft's .NET to mention a few.

    What can we do about it? Well that is a very good question. We can't avoid this conflict but we can prepare for it. Some of the things we can do are: 1) Support Open Source software (although I think that goes with out saying). 2) Write (snailmail, not email) your congressperson to repeal the DMCA. 3) Refuse to buy hardware you can't develop for. I for one have no interest in TiVO are it competitors for one simple reason, it is a black box that is not designed to be user programmable. And finally 4) spread the word.

    For more insight into this issue see the article The Coming Storm by Bruce Bell.

    Truthfully, one thing I personally would really like to do is to develop, but really don't have the resources to do so, is a truly open TiVO like device that is *designed* to be user programmable and will store everything completely unencrypted. This device will force the MPAA industry to accept the inevitable. It is completely legal but the MPAA will completely hate it and will do everything in there power to stop it. And with out a lot of will power and a major team of legal exports to back me up they probably will.

    1. Re:And so it begins ... by thumbtack · · Score: 2

      You Wrote: 2) Write (snailmail, not email) your congressperson to repeal the DMCA.

      That used to be the case, but with all of the Anthrax problems, Congress is having a hard time gettting their mail these days. I deal with a legislative assistant on the hill and the only way to get stuff to them is via e-mail. Mail is held, as is UPS, Fedex, Etc. As it stands at this particular moment if they don't know you they don't want it snail mail or courier.

  56. IBM+ toshiba+sony= PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    probably the software side of that effort...

  57. PS2's OS by Shaheen · · Score: 2

    ... is not Linux. While there is the PS2 Linux kit out there that lets you run Linux on your PS2, the operating system used by the games is a proprietary one, with no relation to Linux.

    The PS2 development kits are modded PCs that run Linux and emulate a PS2 environment.

    --
    You should never take life too seriously - You'll never get out of it alive.
    1. Re:PS2's OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes there is a Linux distribution that runs on the PS2; just read previous comments someone posted mostly the same comment before.

      Read before you post !

  58. Sony and DRM by SoftwareJedi · · Score: 1

    Has any thought it bizarre that Sony a producer of electronics that drive the RIAA and the MPAA up the wall also supports their activities.

    I mean you can buy Sony TIVOs, sony CD-ROM burners, and a host of other devices that allow copyrighted content to copied or stored.

    They also produce the content (TV programs, Movies, and music) that the MPAA and RIAA are suing to "protect". The MPAA and the RIAA get their money from the copyright holders, i.e. Sony and the like.

    It seems to me that that perhaps the RIAA and the MPAA who get their money from Sony and the like should not bite the hand that feeds them. If they successfully out law or curb the use of the devies we enjoy this will directly affect Sony's bottom line and therefore the RIAA and MPAA's.

    Any thoughts?

  59. Storage devices? by 3.14lgrim · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since Sony is involved, the only supported storage devices will probably be Memory Sticks and Minidiscs.

  60. Yes, but not as its primary operating system by XNormal · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's nice to be able to run Linux on your PS2 but that's not what it's running when you are playing Tekken.

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
    1. Re:Yes, but not as its primary operating system by Space+cowboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't believe I claimed that. I was responding to the claim "The PS2 does not run any form of Linux.", which had somehow got a +3 informative (!) rating ... What is interesting is that the Linux kit supports all the major devices on the PS2 - including the vector units (see http://www.ps2linux.com/dmesg.html :-) There's essentially no reason why you couldn't run a game under PS2 linux...

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
  61. There will be no such thing! by MadMirko · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check Gamefront Magazine (German). Sony denied the claims of that Japanese newspaper, calling them a misunderstanding. Sony, IBM and Toshiba are developing a shared broadband network, no OS.

    1. Re:There will be no such thing! by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

      Now that makes a lot more sense.

      When I read:
      The three companies predict the entire development cost will run to about 400 million dollars

      I knew this was not just an OS they where talking about. Although, I'm sure one could spend that much on developing an OS, but @ 133 million a year, that would hire you 1000 people @ 100K salaries (if you take 33M for other cost like office space/equipment etc).

      No one in their right mind would WANT to have that many people developing an OS. Well, maybe some do...

  62. Unbelievable by caspper69 · · Score: 1

    "This is utter crap...."

    That's all I could think as I read this article. And just when I thought it couldn't get any worse, I read this:

    "TVs with the OS installed will be much smaller as they will not need a tuner, the sources said."

    I don't know about you, but I don't want my television to be smaller. I don't care if the components inside can fit on the head of a pin. Give me a 60" HDTV and I'll be a happy man.

    1. Re:Unbelievable by heartstab · · Score: 0

      if this is true, the parent needs to be modded up.

  63. they can't even set standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, but they do have a standard. Which is to keep moving their own standards to make it difficult for a third party to make a product that can communicate with MS products, but doesn't rely on Windows.

  64. Taligent II? by newbob · · Score: 1
    I rememeber Taligent, IBM and Apple's aborted attempt to write an OS, well.

    The Taligent building was about a mile away from me. They sunk about 500 Million (in pre-dot-com $$, when it was a lot of money) and got NOTHING accomplished.

    I worked with a bunch of ex Taligent folks a while later and the stories they told me were astounding! They hired a bunch of smart people, none of whom had any experience shipping any real products. So they wasted man years doing things like writing their own C++ compilers and even trying to design their own CPUs. All to support an yet-to-be-written OS.

    I hope they do better this time. Maybe without Apple in the loop, they'll have a better grasp of reality.

    1. Re:Taligent II? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite a skewed perspective. Some corrections:

      1) Some of us had experience shipping products. A lot of people worked on products at Apple, others at IBM.

      2) Yeah, they wrote their own C++ compiler. And had a full implementation of a native compiler that implemented the standard *YEARS* before anyone else. While others were still playing with pre-compiler front ends like CFront, Taligent was compiling native code on 68k and x86 systems. Having their own compiler was not stupid. Not marketing their compiler in 1992 was the stupid move. They could have and should have been everyone else to the market with a full implementation of C++ years before others. Instead, that compiler technology found its way, years later, into HP and IBM compilers.

      3) Apple had virtually *NOTHING* to do with Taligent after the joint venture was formed. IBM was the company that f*cked Taligent over with all the wrong types of attention.

      I know. I was there. I had a front row seat at the IBM follies.

  65. about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've wondered for some time why Sony didn't provide me with a way to control my Sony audio and video components from my PC. Since they make both AV components and PCs, I've been expecting them to do this for years.

    I'd love to get rid of my 7 remote controls and run everything from my laptop. I'd also like to get rid of all the wires between the various components, speakers, etc. Then let me send or store the audio, video, and data anywhere I want on my wireless net ...

    Like others have said, I can control other appliances (at least turn them on and off) using the X-10 system. But I'd like to set the equalizer on my receiver, change the brightness on my TV, program my VCR, and adjust speaker volumes from my laptop.

    Yes, I'm concerned about Sony trying to prevent me from copying Sony DVDs or CDs, but seems like any new anti-piracy system they come up with, someone finds a way to defeat it.

    And hey ! If you don't like it, don't buy it !

    P.S.: I'm sure all IBM wants to do is create and sell chips. Oops ! Just saw on PBS program called "High Tech Home" that IBM has a spin-off company selling a home network/connector system called "Home Director" !

    Oh well, just give me choices and I'll decide if I want to buy them or not ...

  66. PS2 vs. PS/2 confusion? by yerricde · · Score: 2, Funny

    ohhh boy, with IBM involved, it just might end up being a warmed over version of OS/2

    Then why not call it "OS2"? If OS/2 ran on the PS/2 computer, why not make OS2 run on the PS2 console?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  67. Linux is GPL with an exception by yerricde · · Score: 1

    They could theoretically fork off a copy of linux, but there's still the GPL to contend with, which causes major problems with the integration of patented or licensed technologies.

    Not necessarily. Applications that run on the Linux kernel need not be under the GPL, as the kernel headers carry an exception similar to that of the Guile license. Linus has also allowed companies to produce proprietary kernel modules <cough>NVIDIA</cough> under conditions.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  68. Not everybody chooses where to live by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Well, if you chose to live in the boondocks

    Not everybody chooses where to live. Some people don't have upwards $200,000 to move house.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  69. unemployed IBM OS hackers need something to do by markj02 · · Score: 2
    IBM has a lot of OS hackers, and they have little left to do. AIX is kind of a dead end and IBM management is pushing Linux more and more. OS/2 is dead for practical purposes. They can't just all pack up and go into management. Many of these people think that Linux can't be any good because it is open source and wasn't written by people like them.

    So, what do they do? The desparately try to find a justification for their existence and they pitch various projects to their management. "Media OS", "low latency", "very high bandwidth", "digital rights management", and "working with Sony", is what stuck. Among the few choices that they had to justify working on a new proprietary OS, that's probably the best they could do.

    I doubt it will come to much. In the best case (for them), the PS/3 may run this thing, but PS/2 already runs a proprietary OS. But Linux will be able to handle all those problems as well or better by the time the system comes out, and you will see Linux in more and more media and consumer devices. That's not to say Linux is perfect, just that what these people seem to be proposing doesn't improve on Linux in the areas where it needs improving.

    1. Re:unemployed IBM OS hackers need something to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS/3 may run this new OS since IBM is developing the processor for the PS/3.

  70. There's a point everyone has missed by pyramid+termite · · Score: 2

    They may be running a version of this for the PC in 2005, but it won't have to be run on that. I bet when the next Playstation comes out, they'll be using this OS - they're not just trying to bring us a new operating system, they're probably trying to reinvent the personal computer. And Sony alone is large enough to take care of a relatively middling company like Microsoft.

    In 5 years, the PC as we know it will be on the way out. It's about time, too.

  71. How will Apple react? by pressman · · Score: 1

    If Sony and IBM are involved... Apple will follow suit and probably license the technology. This is digital hub type stuff and that is where Apple is heading. They are publicly proclaiming that they are modeling themselves after Sony and not traditional software developers now. And with IBM being their inly reliable partner in the PPC alliance, well, they won't want to get in bad with IBM.

    --
    Pooty tweet
  72. end of Linux lovefest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Does this mean IBM is over its lovefest with Linux? Too bad they feel like they need to
    develop a new operating system rather than
    using an existing one like Linux or BSD. Wait,
    isn't that what Linux did in not just using BSD?

  73. Isn't this... by deadgoon42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    what BeOS was all about? Doh!!

    --

    Smeghead every day of the week.
    1. Re:Isn't this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical middle and senior managment. heads stuck up each others arse. BeOS would have fitted exactly.

  74. um... sorry to break it to you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but a tv is not high resolution graphics. its as low as it gets.

  75. Changing focus by Ogerman · · Score: 2

    It seems to me that the big names in consumer electronics are hedging their bets on broadband digital entertainment and integrated home entertainment systems as being the big sellers as the economy recovers. Problem is, it'll all be proprietary and have dozens of DRM layers throughout designed to allow content producers to suck every last cent out the consumer. Quite simply, open standards don't allow corporations to manipulate the market. Unless we want to lose all control of entertainment technology and popular media, we need to act now. There needs to be a fully open alternative to the digital media jaggernaut that hollywood and big manufacturers / software companies are preparing. And unfortunately, we are very far behind. We need a media infrastructure that is as good or better than what is currently being developed. And it must be freely available the world over. Unfortunately, there seems to be little interest in multimedia among the top Open Source developers. This needs to change. If MS and the like lose the war for web, they will move elsewhere in attempt to obsolete current Open Source solutions by redefining the market. Frankly, the average consumer hates current desktop computing and rightly so, as it does not truly meet their needs. We must be careful not to fall behind the trends as we polish our desktop solutions.

  76. Flat by Graymalkin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did anybody count the number of call to arms posts on this thread? I nearly pissed myself laughing. Not only is the article not really up on details but Sony flat out denied they were working on an OS. Sounds like somebody was speaking engrish on one end of the line and got somebody else confused.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  77. Fridge (ing-ay) by slashdot.org · · Score: 2, Funny

    According to the sources, local area networks will be used to connect PCs installed with the operating system to TVs, air conditioners, refrigerators and other home appliances, giving great flexibility in controlling home appliances.

    Ahhh, the long awaited broadband connection to the fridge. A whole new world is upon us. Where the fridge is connected and we can ... we can ... Oh, never mind.

    Wait, I remembered,- it can report back to the manufacturer BEFORE the computer chip, used to connect the fridge to the net, is about to fail. So they can send out a service team to replace the chip BEFORE the internet connection even went out!

    You wonder how people have lived without it this long.

  78. Nothing new here.... by Restil · · Score: 2

    I can already control my appliances. I can already control my computer using a TV as a monitor. To watch a video/audio source on a computer screen, I can stick a realtime mpeg encoder at the source and easily stream it through a 10mbps network with no difficulty.

    Doesn't Tivo save TV programs already? If not, I'm always able to download them off usenet or other places due to the due diligence of a few dedicated individuals.

    What this looks like is that they're attempting to create an all-in-one solution and standardize it. Good/Bad who knows. The point here is.. We have 3 years to come up with an alternative solution and standardize the market on it before they have a chance to embrace/extend/exploit.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  79. uhh they are talking about linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    linux is the new os.

    1. Re:uhh they are talking about linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are dreaming. The article doesn't even mention the word "linux".

  80. Let review and comment the end of the article... by pinkpineapple · · Score: 2
    "The three companies predict the entire development cost will run to about 400 million dollars (52 billion yen). "
    Wow! I guess they could raise any interest if they were talking about $400K. It had to be a huge number. That makes sense coming from big corporates. If it is based on OSS and still cost that much, it would have to be marketing mostly.
    "According to the sources, local area networks will be used to connect PCs installed with the operating system to TVs, air conditioners, refrigerators and other home appliances, giving great flexibility in controlling home appliances."
    I am sure that everyone needs their AC plugged to the TV. Really useful stuff.
    "The larger bandwidth of a broadband connection will open the door to the downloading of movies, TV programs and video games via the Internet, the sources said. "
    OK, but does that matter really when more than half of the computer owners in the US are still on dial up connections? Being able to blast my movies all over my home is one thing, but VOD has got nothing to do with it. And I can't even move the content of my DVDs around thanks to the same companies listed here.
    "Users will be able to store television programs in their PCs and watch them at any time and any place."
    Like I just said, I could do that today by copying my DVDs to a hard-disk but they won't even let me do that legally. So, why should I believe some smoke and mirrors BS will make that happen in the future.
    "TVs with the OS installed will be much smaller as they will not need a tuner, the sources said. "
    Now we are talking! A tuner in the TV must take as much as the size of a cigarette lighter. Saving that space is really justifying investing in this new stuff. Really needed.
    "All controls will be accessible from the TV screen, making the system more user-friendly, the sources said, an important feature when considering the elderly and those unfamiliar with using PCs. "
    Which controls? Like PLAY STOP and PAUSE? Coz I got that already on my remote.
    "The OS will also enable tasks impossible for current technology, the sources said.
    OK, that is what I thought. They are still looking for the killer app for that gizmos. Seems like they got authorization by their finance to go and do something they are not really sure about. But it comes right after the M$ homestation read earlier. So that is probably the only valid reason to spend near half a billion dollars. Like I said, makes total sense. PPA, the girl next door.
    --
    -- I feel better now. Thanks for asking.
  81. OS dependant? Not protocol dependant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds kinda sketchy to me. Why would I need this OS? We see where IBM really is, given the opportunity to be a M$ they jump! I mean, if they don't want to use an existing tech to move the data, then they should at least make it open. That way we all get to play and make our iceboxes email us when the beer is about to get skunked!

  82. IP TV by johnjones · · Score: 2

    erm have you ever actually worked in TV industry ?

    head end cost 1/2 million while STB (set top box) under $150

    but yes I know ship 2-3 million STB's and that exeeds the cost if the head end but companies (broadcasters) still look at the cost of head end (servers) as the real cost

    Linux as a STB is already there look at the ATI chip

    strangely its MIPS based much like the PS2 (-;

    broadcast will be done on RTSP and linux can do this really easy AND has alll the add ons such as web browseing, email and such that a digital world demands

    look who cares about linux on x86 but where it willll go on MIPS & ARM and maybe Power THAT will be the turning point

    regards

    john jones

  83. IBM's Motive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IBM is hardcore *profit* now - Linux just happens to fit into that picture. A little good for you, a lot of good for IBM.

  84. Never happen by MOOSTR · · Score: 1

    there's going to be one of 2 things going to happen with this project....if they're starting from scratch i'll guarantee it gets put on the back burner then eventually gets canned because it's just too late in the game to start from scratch it's hard enough keeping up with technology with linux, BSD and windows and they're all mature OS's...so starting from scratch just isn't something i see going through all the way...the other thing is if they're starting from a "base" they've put together with existing code it's not going to have much signifacance? (bad spelling) on anything else other than maybe playstation or on tv but as far as PC's go...the heavyweights got that field and aren't going to give it up easily.....

  85. IBM overexpenditures by Snover · · Score: 1

    Sounds like IBM is spending too much time trying to develop Operating Systems than they are trying to improve hardware. Remember when a PC was known as an "IBM or 100% compatible"? I still laugh when someone asks if I have an IBM...ah, ignorance. The question is, though, WHY aren't PCs still known as that? I'm not talking about political correctness and sommat, I'm talking about how IBM went from being the Top Dog to being near the bottom-of-the-barrel. I mean, I LOVE that they're hardcore Linux now, but it doesn't mean much if they don't start making really great, innovative systems again.

    --

    [insert witty comment here]
  86. Linux Based. by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

    Sony will use its experience developing the PS2 OS (hey, wasn't it Linux based?)

    No. There is however a version of Linux for the PS2. That hardly qualifies the PS2 as a Linux Based device. Almost no games (possibly none at all) have anything Linux in them.

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  87. Tech bullshit in article by GekkePrutser · · Score: 1
    TVs with the OS installed will be much smaller as they will not need a tuner, the sources said.

    So replacing the tuner, which is smaller than a pack of cigs, with a CPU, motherboard, harddrive and memory will make the TV 'much smaller'???

    high-resolution graphics of a television screen

    I think they last called a TV screen 'high resolution' about 15 years ago.

    Users will be able to store television programs in their PCs and watch them at any time and any place.

    Any place? So you'll be able to login to your TV over the 'net? Or will the lack of a tuner make it so small that you can carry your 21" tv in your pocket?

  88. SEND SONY TO THE WELFARE LINES AND....... by screwtheNSA · · Score: 0

    Ship their execs out on the Red Dwarf! Talk about lost in space and such...... Sony; the very name speaks volumes of restrictions and controls in the hands of Sony alone. Forget having "real" control of YOUR equipment if any of the gear has "sony" labeled on the box. EULAS are included INSIDE your new DVD player, which must be read, signed and sent in BEFORE access to your player is granted following the receipt of an E-mail with your personalized P.I.N and "code"....Think SONY PICTURES/PARAMOUNT here! Why would sony(yes, the name does not deserve to be capitalized) open access to their movies on any format because of this bogus announcement? Nope, can't see it ever taking place, unless the U.S. gov. has now removed and struck down DCMA/DRM and so on......Naaa, can't be that easy, can it?

    --
    206.39.38.2, DDN-BLK-36, DOD NET INFO CENTER. 800.365.3642 206.36.0.0-206.39.255.255 NET RANGE.
    1. Re:SEND SONY TO THE WELFARE LINES AND....... by screwtheNSA · · Score: 0

      It's DMCA.... And it's NO...sony does not deserve to be capitalized....CORRECTIONS MADE, DONE, not tried; Try not, and FAIL........Adoy

      --
      206.39.38.2, DDN-BLK-36, DOD NET INFO CENTER. 800.365.3642 206.36.0.0-206.39.255.255 NET RANGE.
  89. Mod Sony et al. -1, Redundant by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Why do we need yet another closed proprietary OS ? If it's just a piece of software to 'enable high-bandwidth media over broadband' or whatever, then they're really wasting their time and everyone else's. We already have mp3, DivX and jpegs.. they work fine. The only thing I think these guys will try to pull off is to make these file formats and codecs completely transparent, thus turning your 1500$ PC into an ugly 19" TV.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  90. gaming possibilities by swankypimp · · Score: 1
    allow personal computers and home appliances to exchange huge volumes of data

    Sweet! Now I can play MMORPGs and Quake on my LAN with/against my toaster! Who needs broadband when I can frag the washing machine?

    --

    --All your stolen base are belong to Rickey Henderson
  91. agreeed, its about time the japanes made an OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    microsoft is very much like GM. big bloated crap

  92. consiumers win because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we finally get japanese quality.like i said before

    microsoft is the GM of computers big, bloated,crappy.