It get even better when you have a sane modern infrastructure like a single strand a fiber to each home from the CO. Layer a muni based L3 network on top on one pair of wavelengths you still easily have room for 7 more per home and smaller players can choose to use the muni's L3 network till it makes sense to build out their own for the town. The muni gains a network for emergency services, school librarys etc, businesses in town can layer on top for their own infrastructure needs at l2 or at l3. If the cost of an interconnect and space is well known and uniform you have a fair playing field.
24 (25) 2.5 across a 2u is nothing new. Supermicro and others can double that 50 in a 2u but they can also get 72 3.5's in a 4ru and thats with a sever as well 90 without.
If your talking about SSD's sas/sata is a dead end not enough performance. NMVe is what ssd's are moving to in enterprise, Mind you something like that your looking at 4 pcie lanes per devices 48 devices your a bit oversubscribed.
Font cant be copyrighted in the US so it's an apples to oranges. I was incorrect in assuming fonts can be copywritten in the US.
You're splitting hairs related to how it's encoded with pictures. A PNG is simple enough but encode it in an SVG and suddenly it looses copyright? I realy doubt a sane court is going to care about encoding when at the end of the day you made a visualy exact duplicate. By your logic if I make a bit of code to print out a barbie doll it's perfectly legal to do so? Pretty sure Mattel (or whoever owns barbie now) will sue you into oblivion for doing so commercially in the US.
Now mind you some of those things were on an even more restrictive license that did not allow commercial use at all, downloading them for commercial use broke copyright well before any prints were made of them.
For a font it definitely does, if you do not have the rights to use the font the output is also tainted since it's just many copies of a copyrighted work. Not that it means the text falls under the fonts copyright. That's far different than using unlicensed software to create a picture.
By failing to attribute the authors they lost their right to use those things. I can not print out a copyrighted picture and sell it without being granted that right by the copyright holder thats pretty much settled law and your implying because it's 3d printer it's somehow different?
It will do ssl just fine. I'll take an embedded micro over a rpi running linux for security for the simple fact that it's running one bit of firmware not a multitasking OS. Mind you would not connect it to the internet either.
They failed to give attribution and failed provide a link to the license. Can not say if they modified it at all or if they were clear that it was licensed under the same
Since they failed to abide by the license they did not have one. Most of the license allow for including in a commercial protect etc, few to none allow you to use it and call it yours.
There are a lot of breakouts for the chip, Something like an adafruit hazzah gets you 9 gpio's, flexible power input (though not like a usb wall wart is hard). As to positioning standard security system magnetic reeds for garage doors work well.
If you have a chamberlain or any of the the other brand names that uses the same kit the myq gateway gets you all that and integrates well with full home automation bits has a stand alone phone app as well. For me that coupled with openhab got me what I wanted. Garage door opens, lights come on if appropriate etc when I turn into my driveway and the opposite when I leave.
The ESP 8266 is more than capable of integrating with higher level controllers. BTLE is not realy in it's bag of tricks, wifi obviously is. In my case higher level app is tracking phones to open up when I am about to pull into the driveway. Though I use a off the shelf bit to interface with the garage door (myq gateway) to keep my insurance guy happy.
Point being IoT end devices should not be exposed to the internet it's a horrid design for something that should work for 10+ years without modification. App specific controllers make sense thus why zwave etc does just that.
Setting up a singular VPN to a dynamic IP is pretty easy and thats one thing updating one service to do so. My app gateway just works with my phone. Besides who wants to install and maintain a pile of different apps. My garage door opener has an app, I just use the single app gateway. Same goes for some fancy light bulbs, the widget that lets me know when the BBQ is running low on gas, etc etc. The IoT will die as a pile of silo's with all the logic in the cloud. The usefulness is it in all working together seamlessly not vendor lock in.
I've got a couple hundred devices that work that way and seems pretty internet of things to me. Only they are my things and only allowed to talk to what I allow them to.
So CCTV camera only talk to NVR's and an application specific gateway. Why would some wifi camera need to talk to the internet as a whole? If I wanted to access it directly I can VPN in. In general the application gateway thats part of my home automation give me all the live info I need. The NVR's deal with long term encryption and retention. They keep trying to sell this kit as disposable flash in the pan junk that quickly becomes useless as standard evolve etc. I still have an IP camera that is 14+ years old, sure when the hardware fails I'll replace it with some multi megapixel unit. The basic concept of of an IoT devices talking directly to anything else is pretty broken. These are devices that should be expect to just work for a long time. App specific gateways can and should be updated on a regular basis but those tend to be mostly software that can run in a VM if IoT takes off probably a function of the wifi AP for normal home users. Firmware updates for CCTV can generally be done from the NVR, with commercial systems this is the default with the NVR also acting as the gateway, POE switch etc etc on the low - medium end.
Security system is mostly stand alone as I want the UL listing for the insurance company to be happy, it has internet access for signaling the alarm company.
HA needed talk to anything but the app gateway. Considering that it's running on 4 or more RF + several wired standards beside IP based it's pretty much a requirement. Picking out gear that works while not connected to the internet can be tricky at times as some of the IP based kit has no local interface. The ESP-8266's actualy work rather well for the homebrew kit they have plenty of brains to do the job autonomously but the system works better on the whole with an overall controller. Simple example, I've got wired motion sensors around the house as part of the security system, I have zwave 6 in 1 sensors where those wired ones do not cover, the overall controller has access to both, it also has access to bluetooth and a number of other inputs to make decisions. That gateway does need some internet access, weather forecasting and a connection to my cellphone being the big ones. But why my lightswitch needs an internet connection?
Apple is not refusing, it's exercising it's rights to protect itself and it's customers. If they were still refusing after all legal remedies have been exhausted that would be an entirely different matter. But pretty much until the supreme court has ruled or refused to pick it up they are simply a company not complying with a burdensome court order as a 3rd party and using the system for relief as allowed for under the law.
What next dont take a plea deal and your obviously a criminal?
Thats is the problem with cable card, they put in the idiotic copy once BS that you needed to be certified to use. VCR's were deemed fair use nearly 40 years ago and they keep trying to weasel out of it. I'm perfectly ok with them watermarking something traceable to stop your average joe from uploading to the net. Putting arbitrary restrictions beyond that is just an attempt to reverse that decision though administrative law.
And since it's not the 1990's anymore anything worth calling it encrypted is storing keys in specialized hardware, so it's not just a question of getting a debugger out and pawing through memory.
If you think relying solely on fingerprint will stop law enforcement from getting into your phone? They will force you to put your finger on the reader. Something you are is not a protected thing something you know may be.
Slashdot Mirror
It get even better when you have a sane modern infrastructure like a single strand a fiber to each home from the CO. Layer a muni based L3 network on top on one pair of wavelengths you still easily have room for 7 more per home and smaller players can choose to use the muni's L3 network till it makes sense to build out their own for the town. The muni gains a network for emergency services, school librarys etc, businesses in town can layer on top for their own infrastructure needs at l2 or at l3. If the cost of an interconnect and space is well known and uniform you have a fair playing field.
24 (25) 2.5 across a 2u is nothing new. Supermicro and others can double that 50 in a 2u but they can also get 72 3.5's in a 4ru and thats with a sever as well 90 without.
If your talking about SSD's sas/sata is a dead end not enough performance. NMVe is what ssd's are moving to in enterprise, Mind you something like that your looking at 4 pcie lanes per devices 48 devices your a bit oversubscribed.
Downloading code most certainly violates copyright.
Calling ti a barbie violates trademark just making a doll that looks exactly the same is copyright.
Font cant be copyrighted in the US so it's an apples to oranges. I was incorrect in assuming fonts can be copywritten in the US.
You're splitting hairs related to how it's encoded with pictures. A PNG is simple enough but encode it in an SVG and suddenly it looses copyright? I realy doubt a sane court is going to care about encoding when at the end of the day you made a visualy exact duplicate. By your logic if I make a bit of code to print out a barbie doll it's perfectly legal to do so? Pretty sure Mattel (or whoever owns barbie now) will sue you into oblivion for doing so commercially in the US.
Now mind you some of those things were on an even more restrictive license that did not allow commercial use at all, downloading them for commercial use broke copyright well before any prints were made of them.
Try the nodemcu firmware generic tls was fixed a couple weeks back.
For a font it definitely does, if you do not have the rights to use the font the output is also tainted since it's just many copies of a copyrighted work. Not that it means the text falls under the fonts copyright. That's far different than using unlicensed software to create a picture.
By failing to attribute the authors they lost their right to use those things. I can not print out a copyrighted picture and sell it without being granted that right by the copyright holder thats pretty much settled law and your implying because it's 3d printer it's somehow different?
Your fine the license for that font probably allowed you to print things out with it and not require anything.
It's litter different if he was selling fake barbie dolls that were straight up knock offs.
It will do ssl just fine. I'll take an embedded micro over a rpi running linux for security for the simple fact that it's running one bit of firmware not a multitasking OS. Mind you would not connect it to the internet either.
Depending on the firmware used it will do SSL/TLS. Would suggest never having something like this accessable from the internet directly.
They failed to give attribution and failed provide a link to the license. Can not say if they modified it at all or if they were clear that it was licensed under the same
Since they failed to abide by the license they did not have one. Most of the license allow for including in a commercial protect etc, few to none allow you to use it and call it yours.
There are a lot of breakouts for the chip, Something like an adafruit hazzah gets you 9 gpio's, flexible power input (though not like a usb wall wart is hard). As to positioning standard security system magnetic reeds for garage doors work well.
If you have a chamberlain or any of the the other brand names that uses the same kit the myq gateway gets you all that and integrates well with full home automation bits has a stand alone phone app as well. For me that coupled with openhab got me what I wanted. Garage door opens, lights come on if appropriate etc when I turn into my driveway and the opposite when I leave.
The ESP 8266 is more than capable of integrating with higher level controllers. BTLE is not realy in it's bag of tricks, wifi obviously is. In my case higher level app is tracking phones to open up when I am about to pull into the driveway. Though I use a off the shelf bit to interface with the garage door (myq gateway) to keep my insurance guy happy.
Point being IoT end devices should not be exposed to the internet it's a horrid design for something that should work for 10+ years without modification. App specific controllers make sense thus why zwave etc does just that.
Setting up a singular VPN to a dynamic IP is pretty easy and thats one thing updating one service to do so. My app gateway just works with my phone. Besides who wants to install and maintain a pile of different apps. My garage door opener has an app, I just use the single app gateway. Same goes for some fancy light bulbs, the widget that lets me know when the BBQ is running low on gas, etc etc. The IoT will die as a pile of silo's with all the logic in the cloud. The usefulness is it in all working together seamlessly not vendor lock in.
Try an ESP 8266 for interfacing a garage door you need what a few inputs and a handful of outputs?
I've got a couple hundred devices that work that way and seems pretty internet of things to me. Only they are my things and only allowed to talk to what I allow them to.
So CCTV camera only talk to NVR's and an application specific gateway. Why would some wifi camera need to talk to the internet as a whole? If I wanted to access it directly I can VPN in. In general the application gateway thats part of my home automation give me all the live info I need. The NVR's deal with long term encryption and retention. They keep trying to sell this kit as disposable flash in the pan junk that quickly becomes useless as standard evolve etc. I still have an IP camera that is 14+ years old, sure when the hardware fails I'll replace it with some multi megapixel unit. The basic concept of of an IoT devices talking directly to anything else is pretty broken. These are devices that should be expect to just work for a long time. App specific gateways can and should be updated on a regular basis but those tend to be mostly software that can run in a VM if IoT takes off probably a function of the wifi AP for normal home users. Firmware updates for CCTV can generally be done from the NVR, with commercial systems this is the default with the NVR also acting as the gateway, POE switch etc etc on the low - medium end.
Security system is mostly stand alone as I want the UL listing for the insurance company to be happy, it has internet access for signaling the alarm company.
HA needed talk to anything but the app gateway. Considering that it's running on 4 or more RF + several wired standards beside IP based it's pretty much a requirement. Picking out gear that works while not connected to the internet can be tricky at times as some of the IP based kit has no local interface. The ESP-8266's actualy work rather well for the homebrew kit they have plenty of brains to do the job autonomously but the system works better on the whole with an overall controller. Simple example, I've got wired motion sensors around the house as part of the security system, I have zwave 6 in 1 sensors where those wired ones do not cover, the overall controller has access to both, it also has access to bluetooth and a number of other inputs to make decisions. That gateway does need some internet access, weather forecasting and a connection to my cellphone being the big ones. But why my lightswitch needs an internet connection?
IoT Subnet, it needs not be able to reach the internet ever.
THus why in most states you need to be certified to do any sort of pole work.
Apple is not refusing, it's exercising it's rights to protect itself and it's customers. If they were still refusing after all legal remedies have been exhausted that would be an entirely different matter. But pretty much until the supreme court has ruled or refused to pick it up they are simply a company not complying with a burdensome court order as a 3rd party and using the system for relief as allowed for under the law.
What next dont take a plea deal and your obviously a criminal?
Thats is the problem with cable card, they put in the idiotic copy once BS that you needed to be certified to use. VCR's were deemed fair use nearly 40 years ago and they keep trying to weasel out of it. I'm perfectly ok with them watermarking something traceable to stop your average joe from uploading to the net. Putting arbitrary restrictions beyond that is just an attempt to reverse that decision though administrative law.
Does you no good if the bootloader on the soc wont run anything not signed.
Any reasonably designed hardware should be resistant of those sort of attacks.
If the hardware is designed correctly that should not be possible.
The crypto is pretty poor if brute force attacks work. Hardware key storage should wipe itself after so many failed attempts.
And since it's not the 1990's anymore anything worth calling it encrypted is storing keys in specialized hardware, so it's not just a question of getting a debugger out and pawing through memory.
If you think relying solely on fingerprint will stop law enforcement from getting into your phone? They will force you to put your finger on the reader. Something you are is not a protected thing something you know may be.