Yes it's on the network but a network should not be a flat thing security wise. Modern gear (ok anything enterprise grade made in the last decade) is perfectly capable of basic ACL's at the port level vlans etc. Modern network security is more than capable of configuring all those layers in an automated fashion. Being on the network and only being able to talk to the xray machines via some specific ports is not much of a risk.
Na was specific to replace the printers to be safe. A printer should not be in a position to compromise anything. All it needs is inbound sessions from a print server. That's a very small exposure window of some sort of exploit.
As I said why in hell is a printer in a position to be used as a jumping off board into anything? A printer needs to talk to a well defined set of hosts and only those hosts generally the print/scan servers and not much else.
Funny my band new 4k is dumb. I've yet to fathom why I would want a smart tv, the display I'll keep for more than a decade the smart parts not so much. I use roku's for the smart bits with plex on top of that. I could just as easily use a rpi or any number of things that I've used over the years. But on average I'm keeping screens for more than a decade. I'm snicker a bit as a friend asked me to take a look at a smart tv that wont work anymore, because the manufacturer is not putting out updates it no longer works with netflix etc etc, my roku of a similar vintage has been updated and works perfectly well for 1080p content.
If you take the risks and start the company (and keep control of it) you get to say what your CEO is worth. Often that CEO will be you.
Shareholders are responsible for the board of directors and they are responsible for the CEO. I can neither confirm or deny the validity of the studies but the board and through them should be able to pay the CEO whatever they want to pay them. This is a private agreement between the major shareholders representatives and the CEO.
In any event CEO pay is fair as it's what they negotiated with the company's owners.
Client calls come into a pbx, ring the cell and desk phone etc etc etc. Mind you my desk phone is an android tablet with poe and a real handset/speaker phone so things like contacts just work and bluetooth.
Second get a phone thats does not suck, working with a nexus 5x and better battery life fast charging for that every 36 hours or so. I do miss my qi charging still.
You mean text not some guys talking head youtube vlog crap? It's very simple unless you're mentally deficient or entirely unfamiliar you read far faster than somebody talks. Sure a good visual is great for some subject matter and voiceovers to a video cane be useful but 99% (made up on the spot) it's just an excuse to be cool or avoid actualy formating your thoughts into the written word.
Might have something to do with those countries putting tariffs in place against are good in retaliation. All tariffs do is isolate economies and give the government piles of money.
Somehow you want to make laws to keep industry local? So you want to be Cuba or North Korea?
M&M security is not great (hard candy shell soft middle) but it's at least something. I've got plenty of CCTV IoT etc etc but they can not access the internet with a singular exception and thats pretty much an application specific firewall. The rest is all easily accessible via a VPN.
We keep getting gear that wants to up upnp to open up ports to the world. Only is useful while talking to cloud control gear. Meaning it's not very useful at all.
Overy low speed limits steal time from drivers the predominant method of daily transportation and the only effect method for most of the country. That why a 85% rule makes sense people are more than capable of determining the correct speed.
If the vast majority can safely navigate at that speed then how can it not be a reasonable safe speed?
If we're trying to engineer it then driver competency, response time, vehicle characteristics, and road conditions would all come into play. But it's reasonable to assume if most people are capable of that speed in whatever car they are driving etc. More importantly differences in vehicle speed are a danger so you want everybody going about the same speed which will be that average regardless of posted.
If that 85% are not crashing into things seems rather safe to say they are correct. Would be hard to find any road where nearly 1 in 6 cars has an accident each time they drive through.
Low speed limits steal time. Transportation is just the a means to get from a to b in the least amount of time possible. If pedestrians or bikes are a problem limit their access, roadways primary function it to allow cars to travel efficiently.
My first house was at the far end of a large condo complex to the tune of 2 miles or so. The posted limit was 5. Now the main road was just that road to get feeder strs to the parking lots with a nice wide sidewalk where children road their bikes. 30ish minutes to drive what amounts to your driveway (shared condo property not a town road) is insane. The safe speed is easily determined as what a large percentage of the people normally drive at.
Not sure on the specific but generally power costs scale down as you use more. The worry here is the power company will make large capital investments to supply them that should be averaged out over 5-10-20 years but they are not sure they will still need it next year sticking everybody else with covering that capitol investment.
Your thinking much like the systemd guys that it's a binary thing. It's not. Right now the sane default is the uefi data is read only (and probably limited to root and some selinux lockdown on top of that). While I realize the uefi variables are meant to be non volatile and shared between operating systems reality is today it's dangerous to allow general access to them.
Overall this seems like a firmware issue if the clear cmos jumper does not set all of this back to the factory state it's broken.
Fiber to the CO is a great fit for that. Entirely passive CWDM is cheap and fiber that could have been put in in the 70's would still work fine today (spec wise). Make the central office a meet me sort of space. Now more enterprising muni's might light a channel to provide lifeline internet/school/government/library/muni peer to peer access and even resell the L2 to providers that do not want to stand up there own infrastructure. In any event the thing that realy should be a monopoly last mile access is while giving a wider choice of providers. The security end can be dealt with with mandatory encryption so the town never knows what's going on. IPv6 actualy lends itself well to this where routing decisions can be made to use your ISP or the muni's own network. That means you can run voip to government schools neighbors get HD voice Vid conferencing etc. If the muni network is considered baseline with your property taxes you can quickly facilitate things like school telepresence.
Slashdot Mirror
The satellite guys have done this forever. Moving the syn/ack to the VPN head end is a stock application at this point.
Pretty sad that HIPPA has less security requirements and teeth than PCI.
Yes it's on the network but a network should not be a flat thing security wise. Modern gear (ok anything enterprise grade made in the last decade) is perfectly capable of basic ACL's at the port level vlans etc. Modern network security is more than capable of configuring all those layers in an automated fashion. Being on the network and only being able to talk to the xray machines via some specific ports is not much of a risk.
Na was specific to replace the printers to be safe. A printer should not be in a position to compromise anything. All it needs is inbound sessions from a print server. That's a very small exposure window of some sort of exploit.
As I said why in hell is a printer in a position to be used as a jumping off board into anything? A printer needs to talk to a well defined set of hosts and only those hosts generally the print/scan servers and not much else.
Why in hell is a printer sitting on the end of an ethernet jack somewhere in any position to compromise anything?
Funny my band new 4k is dumb. I've yet to fathom why I would want a smart tv, the display I'll keep for more than a decade the smart parts not so much. I use roku's for the smart bits with plex on top of that. I could just as easily use a rpi or any number of things that I've used over the years. But on average I'm keeping screens for more than a decade. I'm snicker a bit as a friend asked me to take a look at a smart tv that wont work anymore, because the manufacturer is not putting out updates it no longer works with netflix etc etc, my roku of a similar vintage has been updated and works perfectly well for 1080p content.
If you take the risks and start the company (and keep control of it) you get to say what your CEO is worth. Often that CEO will be you.
Shareholders are responsible for the board of directors and they are responsible for the CEO. I can neither confirm or deny the validity of the studies but the board and through them should be able to pay the CEO whatever they want to pay them. This is a private agreement between the major shareholders representatives and the CEO.
In any event CEO pay is fair as it's what they negotiated with the company's owners.
When you take the risks to start a company you can say what a ceo is worth.
They loose by default. I hope they dont have assets to seize in the EU.
Client calls come into a pbx, ring the cell and desk phone etc etc etc. Mind you my desk phone is an android tablet with poe and a real handset/speaker phone so things like contacts just work and bluetooth.
Second get a phone thats does not suck, working with a nexus 5x and better battery life fast charging for that every 36 hours or so. I do miss my qi charging still.
You mean text not some guys talking head youtube vlog crap? It's very simple unless you're mentally deficient or entirely unfamiliar you read far faster than somebody talks. Sure a good visual is great for some subject matter and voiceovers to a video cane be useful but 99% (made up on the spot) it's just an excuse to be cool or avoid actualy formating your thoughts into the written word.
Might have something to do with those countries putting tariffs in place against are good in retaliation. All tariffs do is isolate economies and give the government piles of money.
Somehow you want to make laws to keep industry local? So you want to be Cuba or North Korea?
M&M security is not great (hard candy shell soft middle) but it's at least something. I've got plenty of CCTV IoT etc etc but they can not access the internet with a singular exception and thats pretty much an application specific firewall. The rest is all easily accessible via a VPN.
We keep getting gear that wants to up upnp to open up ports to the world. Only is useful while talking to cloud control gear. Meaning it's not very useful at all.
Overy low speed limits steal time from drivers the predominant method of daily transportation and the only effect method for most of the country. That why a 85% rule makes sense people are more than capable of determining the correct speed.
Considering that it was a hill yup.
If the vast majority can safely navigate at that speed then how can it not be a reasonable safe speed?
If we're trying to engineer it then driver competency, response time, vehicle characteristics, and road conditions would all come into play. But it's reasonable to assume if most people are capable of that speed in whatever car they are driving etc. More importantly differences in vehicle speed are a danger so you want everybody going about the same speed which will be that average regardless of posted.
If that 85% are not crashing into things seems rather safe to say they are correct. Would be hard to find any road where nearly 1 in 6 cars has an accident each time they drive through.
So your polluting the commons by reporting false information.
Low speed limits steal time. Transportation is just the a means to get from a to b in the least amount of time possible. If pedestrians or bikes are a problem limit their access, roadways primary function it to allow cars to travel efficiently.
My first house was at the far end of a large condo complex to the tune of 2 miles or so. The posted limit was 5. Now the main road was just that road to get feeder strs to the parking lots with a nice wide sidewalk where children road their bikes. 30ish minutes to drive what amounts to your driveway (shared condo property not a town road) is insane. The safe speed is easily determined as what a large percentage of the people normally drive at.
Not sure on the specific but generally power costs scale down as you use more. The worry here is the power company will make large capital investments to supply them that should be averaged out over 5-10-20 years but they are not sure they will still need it next year sticking everybody else with covering that capitol investment.
VM pfsence or similar route everything though that.
ZSUN Wifi Flash is tiny and there have been a string of portable firewalls to do just this.
Your thinking much like the systemd guys that it's a binary thing. It's not. Right now the sane default is the uefi data is read only (and probably limited to root and some selinux lockdown on top of that). While I realize the uefi variables are meant to be non volatile and shared between operating systems reality is today it's dangerous to allow general access to them.
Overall this seems like a firmware issue if the clear cmos jumper does not set all of this back to the factory state it's broken.
Fiber to the CO is a great fit for that. Entirely passive CWDM is cheap and fiber that could have been put in in the 70's would still work fine today (spec wise). Make the central office a meet me sort of space. Now more enterprising muni's might light a channel to provide lifeline internet/school/government/library/muni peer to peer access and even resell the L2 to providers that do not want to stand up there own infrastructure. In any event the thing that realy should be a monopoly last mile access is while giving a wider choice of providers. The security end can be dealt with with mandatory encryption so the town never knows what's going on. IPv6 actualy lends itself well to this where routing decisions can be made to use your ISP or the muni's own network. That means you can run voip to government schools neighbors get HD voice Vid conferencing etc. If the muni network is considered baseline with your property taxes you can quickly facilitate things like school telepresence.