Could you site the source of this "theory", please.
Consider, macro hording of money supply leads to a decrease in money supply for the business-consumer cycle. As less money is available, less items are purchased. As less items are purchased, less employees are required.
I believe the "Angry White People Crowd" are at the "tea party" meeting down the street. Those people seem obsessed with a value system that seems to contradict itself after every sentence. But one thing is definite with the tea party, and that is death to everyone. I have seen to much death to agree with the tea party. And the logistics of living to be over 100, and maintain our population growth, is to go to a space faring culture.
Well, lets just backup here a bit. If my neighbor discovers that part of my fence is broken, and walks onto my property to tell me so:
1. Is the neighbor guilty of Trespassing?
2. Is the neighbor guilty of causing the fence to be broken?
3. Is the neighbor guilty of being the cause of the broken fence?
4. Is the neighbor guilty of Negligence because the fence is broken?
5. Is the neighbor guilty of Indirect Negligence because the fence is broken?
6. Is the neighbor guilty of not maintaining the fence?
7. Is the neighbor guilty of any damage because the fence is broken?
Some Lawyer in their first year of business is going to carve up a Hedge Fund like a Christmas Turkey. Cheers!
Concerning the conservative in the wild, my personal experience has been; intensely amazing, definitely not for the week of spirit. But that is not the reason of this thread.
I know, responding to an A/C is pointless, but a question arises.
What if the decision maker is female? Then it would be vanity. I have found that suggesting someones view is from about half way inside their handlers colon to be informative, and non sexist.
Google's actions speak for its self. Google is not alone, but they became the bad guys when they went offshore. It is a personal embarrassment to see Ugly Americans.
I believe that the parent comment believes that the bad guys are just a couple goofs. That would be a grave decision. But I'm still trying to wrap my head around the "Patriot Act;" Its short sited nature concerns me, go figure.
Your argument has a double edge to it. In order to undercut your competitor you buy cheaper. If the government "adjusts" Trade Balances to shift in one direction or another, that affects the cost of the product. As a purchasing community, the U.S. is tapped. It is getting to the point that business models that rely on outside usage of goods and services are beginning to optimize to the point of extinction. A review of the H.P. business model clearly shows that when a corporation optimizes profit and ignores the 60 month and 120 month business plan, that business model pays a heavy price. What I'm not convinced about is when the government ignores the phrase, "Default/Foreclosure/Auction." Businesses go out of business, that is not necessarily the fault of the people. And the short sightedness of business is definitely not the fault of the people.
It would have been more diplomatic for the U.S. to have stated that Huawei was denied because of its "Convection" to a prior "cost cutting" business model. Also, I believe that there is a requirement for products that are used for Emergency or Military Communications to be manufactured in the U.S.. Not all things, but definitely Communication Package Systems. In that case, anyone outside the U.S. gets a "red flag" regardless of nationality. From a global point of view, Huawei can peddle its comm. gear anywhere on the planet. And from a U.S. perspective, U.S. Trade Balances are so far in the "red" that saying, "no" to other venders outside the U.S. is a help to those of us in the U.S. that can't swap sovereign boundaries like, um, a Bidet.
I'm just thinking of the response when the N.Y.Times requests a Freedom of Information Act on the public comings and goings of Michelle Bachmann. I can almost see the N.Y.Times reporters eyes crossing when they try to make sense of it; it could almost be construed as "Cruel and Unusual."
I agree, mod this parent up. I'm still cross eyed when little shrub thought it very profound that "America and China were two countries separated by a large body of water." After that comment, I'm glad China did not close all its ports to U.S. cargo ships for fear of genetic contamination. And I think President Obama could get a crow bar to close the spigot that drains America about a billion dollars a week in Trade Balances; I don't think we can't take much more global marketing hype.
Multi national businesses are coming to grips with a shrinking world, some will survive this transition. HP doesn't understand that a quick ROI is expensive, it will not survive at this rate. Some other company that can plan further ahead than the next dividend will take HP's place, that is life. I will miss hp, their reputation for making fine products isn't based on selling cheap crap, but its handlers are. I hope that hp sees the day when their share holders, and the its board members stop treating their collective heads like suppositories.
Some things to consider. Businesses can come and go as they please, people can not. But it is a standard method for businesses to be charged a license fee to do business in an area. Government are going to have to do their job of "Community First" if this wave of Economic Locus is to be marginalized.
I'm trying to remember when I looked for a job by what m$ ever said; and that's going back a few years. From my point of view, its what the client had, or wanted to experiment with. Judging by what is advertised by non head hunter companies for software help, they don't listen to m$ either.
Slashdot Mirror
Could you site the source of this "theory", please.
Consider, macro hording of money supply leads to a decrease in money supply for the business-consumer cycle. As less money is available, less items are purchased. As less items are purchased, less employees are required.
I believe the "Angry White People Crowd" are at the "tea party" meeting down the street. Those people seem obsessed with a value system that seems to contradict itself after every sentence. But one thing is definite with the tea party, and that is death to everyone. I have seen to much death to agree with the tea party. And the logistics of living to be over 100, and maintain our population growth, is to go to a space faring culture.
Well, lets just backup here a bit. If my neighbor discovers that part of my fence is broken, and walks onto my property to tell me so:
1. Is the neighbor guilty of Trespassing?
2. Is the neighbor guilty of causing the fence to be broken?
3. Is the neighbor guilty of being the cause of the broken fence?
4. Is the neighbor guilty of Negligence because the fence is broken?
5. Is the neighbor guilty of Indirect Negligence because the fence is broken?
6. Is the neighbor guilty of not maintaining the fence?
7. Is the neighbor guilty of any damage because the fence is broken?
Some Lawyer in their first year of business is going to carve up a Hedge Fund like a Christmas Turkey. Cheers!
I guess the first thing that I wince at, is just its name; that short sightedness mocks the historic record.
Maybe we could ask some Blackberry users? I think they could debate this issue on point.
Concerning the conservative in the wild, my personal experience has been; intensely amazing, definitely not for the week of spirit. But that is not the reason of this thread.
I know, responding to an A/C is pointless, but a question arises.
What if the decision maker is female? Then it would be vanity. I have found that suggesting someones view is from about half way inside their handlers colon to be informative, and non sexist.
It is at that high level that this thread is about.
Google's actions speak for its self. Google is not alone, but they became the bad guys when they went offshore. It is a personal embarrassment to see Ugly Americans.
I guess it comes down to who do you wan ta trust? The man you lected? Or the man who caps ya if you both disagree?
I believe that the parent comment believes that the bad guys are just a couple goofs. That would be a grave decision. But I'm still trying to wrap my head around the "Patriot Act;" Its short sited nature concerns me, go figure.
Your argument has a double edge to it. In order to undercut your competitor you buy cheaper. If the government "adjusts" Trade Balances to shift in one direction or another, that affects the cost of the product. As a purchasing community, the U.S. is tapped. It is getting to the point that business models that rely on outside usage of goods and services are beginning to optimize to the point of extinction. A review of the H.P. business model clearly shows that when a corporation optimizes profit and ignores the 60 month and 120 month business plan, that business model pays a heavy price. What I'm not convinced about is when the government ignores the phrase, "Default/Foreclosure/Auction." Businesses go out of business, that is not necessarily the fault of the people. And the short sightedness of business is definitely not the fault of the people.
Maybe you could describe in more detail of, "devices of all kinds flowing into the U.S.?"
No one is stopping you from buying the red cans and strings. Go for it.
It would have been more diplomatic for the U.S. to have stated that Huawei was denied because of its "Convection" to a prior "cost cutting" business model. Also, I believe that there is a requirement for products that are used for Emergency or Military Communications to be manufactured in the U.S.. Not all things, but definitely Communication Package Systems. In that case, anyone outside the U.S. gets a "red flag" regardless of nationality. From a global point of view, Huawei can peddle its comm. gear anywhere on the planet. And from a U.S. perspective, U.S. Trade Balances are so far in the "red" that saying, "no" to other venders outside the U.S. is a help to those of us in the U.S. that can't swap sovereign boundaries like, um, a Bidet.
Is this question from personal observation? Or Envy? Or both?
The problem with this contest is that there will only be One "winner". Maybe they could "Crowd Source" it?
I'm just thinking of the response when the N.Y.Times requests a Freedom of Information Act on the public comings and goings of Michelle Bachmann. I can almost see the N.Y.Times reporters eyes crossing when they try to make sense of it; it could almost be construed as "Cruel and Unusual."
I agree, mod this parent up. I'm still cross eyed when little shrub thought it very profound that "America and China were two countries separated by a large body of water." After that comment, I'm glad China did not close all its ports to U.S. cargo ships for fear of genetic contamination. And I think President Obama could get a crow bar to close the spigot that drains America about a billion dollars a week in Trade Balances; I don't think we can't take much more global marketing hype.
I am Spartacus!
Multi national businesses are coming to grips with a shrinking world, some will survive this transition. HP doesn't understand that a quick ROI is expensive, it will not survive at this rate. Some other company that can plan further ahead than the next dividend will take HP's place, that is life. I will miss hp, their reputation for making fine products isn't based on selling cheap crap, but its handlers are. I hope that hp sees the day when their share holders, and the its board members stop treating their collective heads like suppositories.
Some things to consider. Businesses can come and go as they please, people can not. But it is a standard method for businesses to be charged a license fee to do business in an area. Government are going to have to do their job of "Community First" if this wave of Economic Locus is to be marginalized.
If Corporations want to be treated like people, then let them experience Capitol Punishment for murder.
I'm trying to remember when I looked for a job by what m$ ever said; and that's going back a few years. From my point of view, its what the client had, or wanted to experiment with. Judging by what is advertised by non head hunter companies for software help, they don't listen to m$ either.
You're being optimistic. Try everyone, that way these Neo/> Enforcers will have a life, until their the suspect.
I was looking forward to sleeping in a warm pool of water, and getting paid for it.