Well, there are those fat people who it does occur to but are two stupid to understand that you need a certain amount of fat and calories, so their bodies go into starvation mode and they stay fat living like a bird.
Then again, it takes all kinds of stupid people, like stupid people like you who don't realize there is more than one reason people are fat.
Yeah, sooooo difficult for an accelerometer to notice it's moving down. Now how could we get a machine to understand even 3 alcohol levels, beer, wine, spirits? I wish people would invent some sort of selection device thingy....
Are you not shamed parading your inability for problem solving, oh wait, you are which is why you posted AC.
Personally, for my use, I think it's useless. However there exists a vast majority of individuals who cannot accurately assess their intelligence, skills, talents, etc... let alone their alcohol consumption.
The logistics don't make sense for a bar, but who said they would? The clearly clueless sometimes can tell that they're clueless. These people would buy their own and have it calibrated to their sips and their individual consumption limits. Simple. I really can't understand why people constantly say something is useless by extrapolating it out into something that is clearly useless.
If you don't understand how something works, probably best not to criticize how you think it won't work without explaining why it's a bad idea. Given a decent accelerometer and an intelligent algorithm (I can already see it, you however, can not) you can have accurate readings for practical use.
However, anybody who has met somebody like a Aaron, or is like him, knows that the person that pushed him the hardest was himself. It is very depressing to have a vision of the future within easy grasp and constantly see the world fail at making any concerted effort towards it.
When you don't have an accurate representation of other's, the only thing you can compare yourself, and your abilities, against is perfection. Believe me, self-esteem problems due to comparison to others who might be better than you in one field is nothing compared to comparing yourself to perfection in everything. Nor does it help to see icons in your field constantly failing against the same measure.
Do you know how lonely the world can be when even less than 1/100th of the population can even intellectually grasp your vision?
There is a great divide in the grokking capabilities of programmers. Whether or not this extends to the general population in the same ratio or one less favourable to non-programmers is debatable. Imperative and procedural actually seems to be what most programmers are engineered for, and can provide some of the worst code ever.
Declarative might actually be a lot easier for someone who isn't a programmer to grasp because it isn't mired in pointless little implementation details.
Understanding tcp/ip is less about understanding algorithms and more about understanding somewhat arbitrary design decisions. It is, in fact, not required at all for algorithmic thinking, nor for programming.
If I can easily tell the difference between ~2x the bitrate and you can't tell the difference with ~4x the bitrate on a bigger screen and starting off with a format that had less visual detail, somethings wrong.
Not sure how it is at the corporate level. I just know that I waste way too much time finding out what's available and trying to figure out the documentation. Almost 90% of the time I would have spent less time writing the part I needed. Only exception is CLX.
Oh, i'm not a programmer. Just most programmers recognise it's more efficient doing something in place than allocating more memory. Not necessarily safer or more elegant, just more effiCient.
Slashdot Mirror
Then again, it takes all kinds of stupid people, like stupid people like you who don't realize there is more than one reason people are fat.
Are you not shamed parading your inability for problem solving, oh wait, you are which is why you posted AC.
Idiots like you, who are unable to see easy solutions to trivial problems, are what keep innovation down.
The logistics don't make sense for a bar, but who said they would? The clearly clueless sometimes can tell that they're clueless. These people would buy their own and have it calibrated to their sips and their individual consumption limits. Simple. I really can't understand why people constantly say something is useless by extrapolating it out into something that is clearly useless.
If you don't understand how something works, probably best not to criticize how you think it won't work without explaining why it's a bad idea. Given a decent accelerometer and an intelligent algorithm (I can already see it, you however, can not) you can have accurate readings for practical use.
This! You'll be suprised how long that reaching forward action stays around. Still hope I can find a mobo fix for my hp tx2500.
and why would they add gorilla glass to something already protected by it's clamshell design?
Don't assume the rest of the pop is as kinesthetically ignorant or puny as you.
Now finger smudges...
However, anybody who has met somebody like a Aaron, or is like him, knows that the person that pushed him the hardest was himself. It is very depressing to have a vision of the future within easy grasp and constantly see the world fail at making any concerted effort towards it.
When you don't have an accurate representation of other's, the only thing you can compare yourself, and your abilities, against is perfection. Believe me, self-esteem problems due to comparison to others who might be better than you in one field is nothing compared to comparing yourself to perfection in everything. Nor does it help to see icons in your field constantly failing against the same measure.
Do you know how lonely the world can be when even less than 1/100th of the population can even intellectually grasp your vision?
Declarative might actually be a lot easier for someone who isn't a programmer to grasp because it isn't mired in pointless little implementation details.
I don't get the "at the mercy of" thing. You aren't at the mercy of musicians. They are at your mercy.
Never worked in an office with a radio playing that wasn't under your control have you?
Why something with so much boilerplate instead of something like smalltalk? Are you considering her needs or just your own?
Understanding tcp/ip is less about understanding algorithms and more about understanding somewhat arbitrary design decisions. It is, in fact, not required at all for algorithmic thinking, nor for programming.
...or you'll realize that most of the programmers taught in schools aren't worth their salt.
I think you mean code-monkey.
I'm not. Why are you arguing that I'm arguing that? Can you not read?
Or at least something that can run an X server that can send multitouch back to a client
It's just a tag, you can use it however you want. You don't have to be so whiny about it.
If I can easily tell the difference between ~2x the bitrate and you can't tell the difference with ~4x the bitrate on a bigger screen and starting off with a format that had less visual detail, somethings wrong.
Not sure how it is at the corporate level. I just know that I waste way too much time finding out what's available and trying to figure out the documentation. Almost 90% of the time I would have spent less time writing the part I needed. Only exception is CLX.
oh, and it's returned to the people with median household incomes that do the work in the factories? No?
Not sure why USians enjoy being treated like afeared slaves all the time.
Don't care about people in your own country being slaughtered? Got to love US patriotism.
Oh, i'm not a programmer. Just most programmers recognise it's more efficient doing something in place than allocating more memory. Not necessarily safer or more elegant, just more effiCient.
The beauty of reality, eh?