When scientists work on technology they hardly have affordability in mind. The chief objective is to first get the breakthrough, and then later versions that are affordable will follow. And if it weren't for this where would funding for reasearch stand?
And so when the bacteria comes to life it says- "Oh is this what I have developed into over the millinia. These ugly creatures who think too much of themselves. And consider! they are afraid of dinosaurs, what a laugh?"
Competing in physical activities is no big deal even though we have to keep in mind the twist and turns the car has to take to avoid other racers, but here again there is no risk to life to the experimental car. Machines have since ages been doing things more efficiently. All through ages we have known that man was not the sturdiest nor the fastest, it is just one species of the planet. But this just one species has made the world go round it and no car racing machine can change that. For the believers here's a line --even though we may achieve great things we are still made by God and he is superior, so also we made machines and we are the gods to them and interfere in their lives as to our whim and fancy.
Gartner seems to say that the future could be very similar to Orwell's description of the year 1984 in his novel with the same name. Check out this pervasive Internet connectivity.
When I was in college I was expected to write form the very few books available locally and maybe one or two foreign editions, but now I am sure the expectation of the examiner would be higher since my refernce field would increase immensly. Even if the examiner were complacent works of co-students (the serious ones) would lead to it. And ofcourse the examiners life isn't any easier for he may not be sure whether the student is speaking in terms of the latest developments unless he too puts in more effort. So its going to make everyone work more and yet doubt whether it is sufficient.
This is one simple and straight article and can be understood by anyone. Wish people would follow this principle of simplicity rather than confuse everyone with super-technical jargon.
So even this path is blocked.
on
Anonymity
·
· Score: 1
Now where does an unhappy employee go if he is unhappy? This seemed the only way to let out the steam. Remember that long post from an employee of slashdot. By the way, did slash also resort to something similar?
when some one gives a link to an article in a language other than english he should expand more. The article got me interested but the link was a disappointment.
You could have hit the bulls eye. We all seem in such a rush to post our comments before the others, that we don't waste time reading the articles or even waiting to understand it before we press the reply button.
The P2P community has realised that its "now or never", and are making sure they get what they want.They hwave learnt their lesson well from previous experience and will not allow the biggies to get away with the whole pie this time.
Money makes all the difference, ealier, now and forever. And labour flocks where the money is. In yesteryears it used to be by force, now its voluntary. Don't the overseas guys know the situation, yet they are willing to face being called servants because they reason that in the end they stand to gain, experience and moneywise.
And it has been the nature of the host country to always feel superior. Even the british colonies where they started out as traders, were looked down upon till they became the rulers. They were underestimated till they had taken control of the country. Another very different example is that of Saudi Arabia. 30 years ago they came to india to sell merchandise and lived an almost nomadic life and were pitied, but now the Indians go there in search of livelihood and are treated like dirt. So I would say it's how the social psyche works and people compromise with it. No foreigner will give up the opportunity to work in the US just because some dunk pointed out what he knew anyways.
Or else what would happen to all those employed in these projects. We support further employment. And everything one does need not be meaningful, variety is the keyword.
This case is sick and never ending and by the time it ends people will probably start sueing Microsoft for boring them to ilness and the cases will go on and on. Maybe the guiness book should record this case. It would have surely broken many records. Or perhaps its already featured . Will someone find out?
I would like to apply for a patent for my very innovative and path breaking technology of posting the first post in sites like slashdot. Instead of presing the refresh button often to catch the latest article I have written a javascript for the favourite link so that as soon as there is a post on Slashdot my window refreshes on its own. And Any one can happily be assured of a first post on comments.
This is indeed a good review, firstly because it is very organised and you can look at the section you are most interested in, like say the positive points, or perhaps only where the book fails. However best of all is that it tells you the type of readers who'd benifit. Even in these times there are scores who have just heard the word dot-com and dream of becoming an entrepreneur in the field. Such people have heard of the dollars to be earned but don't know anything beyond that. They are all excitment with no bed to roll on. so this book will perhaps actually prove to bring them back to the real world and equip them with some more knowledge than " dotcom " and " dollars".
Most often than not the judiciary seems bent on proving people are on the wrong and must be punished. This is one rare insight on their part, not to take emails and comments on the net very seroiusly . Imagine if they just thought we at Slash should be punished for our oh-not-so-propah comments. They do realise that net users aren't actually all that serious as the money seems to portray. We are all having fun and the money just came by and the fun became even more fun. Am I right?
We all know of hacking and what it does but never get down to think seriously about it. Most times we overlook it as a prank and if it gets to govt. secutity, debate about it; only to forget after a while. But the problem is realy serious as pointed out by this article. A majority of internet users actually believe what they read on the net never thinking the the info that they have read could just have been lifted from some other place without verification and that at times authors can write based on their own half baked understanding of things. Just as many of the slashdot readers like me do.
Slashdot Mirror
we aren't resistant to reading so much . Imagine following all those links.
"We could have been sitting pretty but it has worked out well for the winner who will be richer than I am."
When scientists work on technology they hardly have affordability in mind. The chief objective is to first get the breakthrough, and then later versions that are affordable will follow. And if it weren't for this where would funding for reasearch stand?
And so when the bacteria comes to life it says- "Oh is this what I have developed into over the millinia. These ugly creatures who think too much of themselves. And consider! they are afraid of dinosaurs, what a laugh?"
Competing in physical activities is no big deal even though we have to keep in mind the twist and turns the car has to take to avoid other racers, but here again there is no risk to life to the experimental car. Machines have since ages been doing things more efficiently. All through ages we have known that man was not the sturdiest nor the fastest, it is just one species of the planet. But this just one species has made the world go round it and no car racing machine can change that. For the believers here's a line --even though we may achieve great things we are still made by God and he is superior, so also we made machines and we are the gods to them and interfere in their lives as to our whim and fancy.
So the enigma of the theft of Enigma remains an enigma in its return.
Gartner seems to say that the future could be very similar to Orwell's description of the year 1984 in his novel with the same name. Check out this pervasive Internet connectivity.
Ther is something called Manpower or voter power in this case, which has nothing to do with money power.
When I was in college I was expected to write form the very few books available locally and maybe one or two foreign editions, but now I am sure the expectation of the examiner would be higher since my refernce field would increase immensly. Even if the examiner were complacent works of co-students (the serious ones) would lead to it. And ofcourse the examiners life isn't any easier for he may not be sure whether the student is speaking in terms of the latest developments unless he too puts in more effort. So its going to make everyone work more and yet doubt whether it is sufficient.
This is one simple and straight article and can be understood by anyone. Wish people would follow this principle of simplicity rather than confuse everyone with super-technical jargon.
One place to go is sites that use the slashcode.
Now where does an unhappy employee go if he is unhappy? This seemed the only way to let out the steam. Remember that long post from an employee of slashdot. By the way, did slash also resort to something similar?
when some one gives a link to an article in a language other than english he should expand more. The article got me interested but the link was a disappointment.
You could have hit the bulls eye. We all seem in such a rush to post our comments before the others, that we don't waste time reading the articles or even waiting to understand it before we press the reply button.
Why are the girls sluts and the boys not bastards- when they are both doing this p2p GF thing?
yep you raised a pint. I feel people don't need to add irrelevant excuses to an appeal. By the way what makes them so unsure? Can anyone answer this ?
The P2P community has realised that its "now or never", and are making sure they get what they want.They hwave learnt their lesson well from previous experience and will not allow the biggies to get away with the whole pie this time.
Money makes all the difference, ealier, now and forever. And labour flocks where the money is. In yesteryears it used to be by force, now its voluntary. Don't the overseas guys know the situation, yet they are willing to face being called servants because they reason that in the end they stand to gain, experience and moneywise. And it has been the nature of the host country to always feel superior. Even the british colonies where they started out as traders, were looked down upon till they became the rulers. They were underestimated till they had taken control of the country. Another very different example is that of Saudi Arabia. 30 years ago they came to india to sell merchandise and lived an almost nomadic life and were pitied, but now the Indians go there in search of livelihood and are treated like dirt. So I would say it's how the social psyche works and people compromise with it. No foreigner will give up the opportunity to work in the US just because some dunk pointed out what he knew anyways.
Or else what would happen to all those employed in these projects. We support further employment. And everything one does need not be meaningful, variety is the keyword.
This case is sick and never ending and by the time it ends people will probably start sueing Microsoft for boring them to ilness and the cases will go on and on. Maybe the guiness book should record this case. It would have surely broken many records. Or perhaps its already featured . Will someone find out?
I just did. Read my post.
I would like to apply for a patent for my very innovative and path breaking technology of posting the first post in sites like slashdot. Instead of presing the refresh button often to catch the latest article I have written a javascript for the favourite link so that as soon as there is a post on Slashdot my window refreshes on its own. And Any one can happily be assured of a first post on comments.
This is indeed a good review, firstly because it is very organised and you can look at the section you are most interested in, like say the positive points, or perhaps only where the book fails. However best of all is that it tells you the type of readers who'd benifit. Even in these times there are scores who have just heard the word dot-com and dream of becoming an entrepreneur in the field. Such people have heard of the dollars to be earned but don't know anything beyond that. They are all excitment with no bed to roll on. so this book will perhaps actually prove to bring them back to the real world and equip them with some more knowledge than " dotcom " and " dollars".
Most often than not the judiciary seems bent on proving people are on the wrong and must be punished. This is one rare insight on their part, not to take emails and comments on the net very seroiusly . Imagine if they just thought we at Slash should be punished for our oh-not-so-propah comments. They do realise that net users aren't actually all that serious as the money seems to portray. We are all having fun and the money just came by and the fun became even more fun. Am I right?
We all know of hacking and what it does but never get down to think seriously about it. Most times we overlook it as a prank and if it gets to govt. secutity, debate about it; only to forget after a while. But the problem is realy serious as pointed out by this article. A majority of internet users actually believe what they read on the net never thinking the the info that they have read could just have been lifted from some other place without verification and that at times authors can write based on their own half baked understanding of things. Just as many of the slashdot readers like me do.