It's only legal to hide certain information from patients, such as information disclosed confidentially to a doctor.
Federally, right to access is guaranteed by HIPAA (though entities can charge a "reasonable" fee for access). There are also variety of state medical access laws. In New York, for example, a doctor may elect to redact information about a minor to prevent parents access, if they believe release would be harmful to the patient.
You would think that you would have a right to any data produced by your body or devices used in keeping it alive and it would be available to at least you or your doctor
You already have a right to all of your medical records. I don't understand how this data is not a "medical record."
New software is not new invention. You are just using the same old universal algorithms over and over again.
That's my opinion - but regardless, the real problem is that the patent office must generate its own funding via fees, creating an incentive to approve every patent (so the fat reexamination fee can be collected later).
Our money is created. It's a fiat currency created by the government, which then generates demand for said money by levying taxes which can only be remitted in that currency.
You're creating a catch-22. If the document can be produced (and is valid) there is no perjury, but if the document cannot be produced then the document cannot be validated yet is presumed so.
I agree...but their seem to be real downsides to having this purely financial component of the economy be so large relative to the part that is production and exchange of actual goods and services.
Is the problem really the rate of trades, or is it the relative proportion of the economy that has no basis in reality (i.e. actual goods and services)?
No, he just said that a bank should have to prove they own my house if they want to repossess it. Quick, why should they not have to prove their documentation is valid?
How about evading web paywalls by refusing or deleting cookies?
I think it's an interesting case since on some sites all that means is you are actually downloading less data. New York Times and The Economist provide good examples of this.
The concert halls, musical theatres, etc... etc... that provided a bare living a century ago are all but gone - not only physically, but from our culture as well.
Not where I live. If you want to enjoy live, new, local music, move to a cultural center.
I don't know a single musician under the age of 35 (or, for that matter, over the age of 100) who views government granted monopolies as their "incentive to keep making music."
Three billion people in Africa and Asia aren't going to know anything about Bill Gates except that he paid for the mosquito nets and antimalarial drugs that saved their children.
Slashdot Mirror
It's real steel springs or nothing, baby.
You can unlock the phone that way in ICS (and in iOS).
It's only legal to hide certain information from patients, such as information disclosed confidentially to a doctor.
Federally, right to access is guaranteed by HIPAA (though entities can charge a "reasonable" fee for access). There are also variety of state medical access laws. In New York, for example, a doctor may elect to redact information about a minor to prevent parents access, if they believe release would be harmful to the patient.
You would think that you would have a right to any data produced by your body or devices used in keeping it alive and it would be available to at least you or your doctor
You already have a right to all of your medical records. I don't understand how this data is not a "medical record."
New software is not new invention. You are just using the same old universal algorithms over and over again.
That's my opinion - but regardless, the real problem is that the patent office must generate its own funding via fees, creating an incentive to approve every patent (so the fat reexamination fee can be collected later).
Our money is created. It's a fiat currency created by the government, which then generates demand for said money by levying taxes which can only be remitted in that currency.
Don't be so sure. Read primary sources before judging what is most supported by evidence.
This study in PNAS shows something different, that diversity has historically suffered around all or nearly all global temperature peaks.
You're creating a catch-22. If the document can be produced (and is valid) there is no perjury, but if the document cannot be produced then the document cannot be validated yet is presumed so.
If a mortgage holder cannot produce the note to a court, the mortgage is null and void
So we should just take the lender's word that they own the debt? Because that would be the alternative.
It varies, but the actual trading fees are currently about twice what you suggest.
I agree...but their seem to be real downsides to having this purely financial component of the economy be so large relative to the part that is production and exchange of actual goods and services.
Is the problem really the rate of trades, or is it the relative proportion of the economy that has no basis in reality (i.e. actual goods and services)?
No, he just said that a bank should have to prove they own my house if they want to repossess it. Quick, why should they not have to prove their documentation is valid?
Hey, look, I own msauve's house, hand it over!
Go back just a little farther, and the threat of actual invasion was believed to be imminent.
FTFY. Unless you really meant just the threat was imminent.
"Functioning?"
In any event I think devaluation will always be more likely than default.
At least two, anyway.
The best part of this boycott is that you don't have to go without.
How about evading web paywalls by refusing or deleting cookies?
I think it's an interesting case since on some sites all that means is you are actually downloading less data. New York Times and The Economist provide good examples of this.
I know right? That's why Sweden and Norway are about to default on all their debt.
Woosh. He was making fun of your grammar; technically it's "must have been."
I hate to break it to you - but where you live isn't the whole of the world.
I'm aware. That's (one of the reasons) why I live here (a major cultural center).
The concert halls, musical theatres, etc... etc... that provided a bare living a century ago are all but gone - not only physically, but from our culture as well.
Not where I live. If you want to enjoy live, new, local music, move to a cultural center.
I don't know a single musician under the age of 35 (or, for that matter, over the age of 100) who views government granted monopolies as their "incentive to keep making music."
Three billion people in Africa and Asia aren't going to know anything about Bill Gates except that he paid for the mosquito nets and antimalarial drugs that saved their children.
But when you are publicly charitable, you get to do this. And that is why Gates does it like that (and yes, it does encourage others to get involved).