when they start failing 'in less than 5 minutes', do you change tack, find other ways to ask questions, go in a direction that they're initially more comfortable with and bring them back around?
so you're saying ownership of a firearm escalates the possibility of it being used (by you or someone else) for unlawful activity.
much like having a drink and taking a drive is now effectively outlawed. no one cares if you are measurably impaired behind the wheel, you are just statistically more likely to injure someone else. you blow the number and you're done, even if you could do laps at Daytona at 200 MPH. the escalated possibility is why.
" according to basics of economics means you've increased demand for insurance, and by making it required by law, created a very, very inelastic supply curve. "
do you think they mine insurance polices like they mine unobtanium?
Slashdot Mirror
kudos for adaptability. so many like to fellate their hallowed interview process because it fails so many applicants
" I don't think we've let a good one go"
uh huh
when they start failing 'in less than 5 minutes', do you change tack, find other ways to ask questions, go in a direction that they're initially more comfortable with and bring them back around?
"But then they have to work with a bunch of other people who couldn't pass the test."
No, just a bunch of other people who didn't take the test.
THIS
The smarter (i.e. more qualified) the applicant, the more questions they are going to ask.
It must effective because so many people fail it.
Wait...
but only for spherical chickens in a vacuum
...or the good sense not to.
and Microsoft was going to be the next Microsoft
so you're saying ownership of a firearm escalates the possibility of it being used (by you or someone else) for unlawful activity.
much like having a drink and taking a drive is now effectively outlawed. no one cares if you are measurably impaired behind the wheel, you are just statistically more likely to injure someone else. you blow the number and you're done, even if you could do laps at Daytona at 200 MPH. the escalated possibility is why.
own a gun, blow .08, it's the same thing.
and are you going to let them raise your property taxes to pay for their firearms training and periodic re-qualification?
unless he means "better' as in a higher body count
iRandom
I guess you missed the Republican primary...
" according to basics of economics means you've increased demand for insurance, and by making it required by law, created a very, very inelastic supply curve. "
do you think they mine insurance polices like they mine unobtanium?
Sealand is looking for a new ruler.
no, the interesting question is why fundamentalist Christians never apply the term to anything.
same here. I wonder how many others on this site did as well.
ERROR_SUCCESS !
You, sir, obviously don't subscribe to it, or if you do, do not actually read it.
you did that wrong
"Everyone else is doing it wrong."
Interesting how the man you castigate is the living counterexample to your thesis.
(don't tell him it's actually just a wifi detector)
It puts the article in the magazine, or it gets the hose again....
"vast majority of people consider themselves religious"
on the basis of a poll question, not behavior.
the vast majority also consider themselves smart and excellent drivers.
"agnostic Christian"
that's an oddly specific agnosticism