Slashdot Mirror


Windows Phone 8 Users Hit Some Snags

symbolset writes "As reported on The Verge, many people are experiencing freezing, rebooting and battery problems on their new Windows Phone 8 devices. This WP8Central thread shows many of the issues. Affected devices include Lumia 920 and HTC 8X." Every phone and every OS has its problems, and happy users probably aren't as vocal; it would be good to know how Windows Phone users who are also iOS and Android users compare them for reliability.

391 comments

  1. No issue with my Lumia 920 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So no vocal complaints from me. Love the phone, wish the app ecosystem were a bit better, especially having been on iOS for many years. I suppose I still have my iPad 3 for that!

    1. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Windows has detected an incoming call and must restart for the changes to take effect. Windows will restart in 1 minute.

      Windows has detected that you've moved to a new location and must restart for the changes to take effect. Windows will restart in 1 minute.

    2. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of course it's defective!

      Which part of "Microsoft Product" did you not understand?

    3. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Android will just freeze and be a laggy piece of shit. No warnings though, just a kernel pani-

    4. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      It's a friggin joke, pencil neck.

      Yes, Windows certainly has (in the past, if not now) required more reboots than many other operating systems, for a long time.

      It should be pretty obvious to anybody not completely humor-impaired, that Windows phones don't *actually* require a reboot to accept a call or update position. I guess that counts you out, though.

    5. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by gmuslera · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's working as it should .

      Which part of "Microsoft Product" did you not understand?

    6. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by egr · · Score: 2

      This is so reminds me of D-Link home routers:

      You have opened a port, the router must restart for changes to take effect. Please wait 60 seconds...

    7. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by craigminah · · Score: 1

      One of my favorites:

      Windows has detected your mouse has moved and must restart for changes to take effect.

    8. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I don't understand all the praise to iPhone and iOS. I get a day out of a charge with limited use (no movies, most email and some web browsing), about an hour talk time. Also, I have apps crashing all the time. iOS however is quite stable, never need to reboot, but do have UI glitches. But what's to crash when nothing runs...

    9. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by ByOhTek · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cute, but I doubt that bad.

      I've had an iPhone4S, a couple of Androids (Samsuck, HTC) and a Windows Mobile 7 phone (HTC).

      Outside of the Samsungs, they've all been exceptionally stable. Apple has the best ecosystem, but IMO is the least user friendly. Android is probably the most user friendly, but tries to be too similar to a desktop system, and feels slightly clunkly. Windows Mobile 7 has a horribly poor selection of apps, almost as user friendly as Android and has a fairly smooth design for mobile setups. Playing with Windows 8 on a desktop, I doubt much has changed, but given the ravamp of the OS, I wouldn't consider buying a phone with it for at least a few months to a year yet, at minimum. Stick with Android.

      The only system I've had anywhere similar a reboot experience as you described was on the Samsung Androids (one was a Transform, the other was the replacement model for a Transform).

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    10. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Then don't get a Samsung. Every other Android product I've used has been perfectly stable (admittedly most are tablets, the only non-Samsung phones I've used were HTC).

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    11. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by ByOhTek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Marketing and cognitive dissonance. Also, some people are using the well marketed (but crap) or cheap (and crap) android phones, and think that is the standard.

      I'd personally take a Windows Mobile 7 phone over and Android or iOS, but wouldn't actually recommend it to others (works for my uses, but wouldn't work for most people's uses).
      I'd recommend others get a *good* Android (more apps, more of what most people would want out of a smartphone).

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    12. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by ultrasawblade · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Application "Sarcasm" has stopped responding.

      [Force Close] [Wait]

    13. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

      I call BULLSHIT sir! If you have nothing running then you will get more than a day per charge. If however you have everything running under the moon then yes you will not get much of a charge. But then again neither will you from Android, or any other phone. I have both Android and iOS phones and the reality is that you need to turn crap off or target what you want running and what you don't. I can usually get about 3 to 4 days out of a charge and that is with email, and notifications running.

      But hey you are an anonymous coward making rants and complaints for fear that you might be BS'ing us.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    14. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by PortHaven · · Score: 0

      I call bovine fecal matter on your bovine fecal matter....

      Seriously, even with most things closed. I never get a day's charge with moderate use. Thankfully, I have chargers everywhere. Unthankfully, iPhone chargers are the most finicky pieces of crap. The cables fail often and cost a small fortune...

    15. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by Whatanut · · Score: 1

      Your experience does not correlate with my experience.

      --

      yvan eht nioj
    16. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      It should be pretty obvious to anybody not completely humor-impaired, that Windows phones don't *actually* require a reboot to accept a call or update position. I guess that counts you out, though.

      Call me impaired then, it sounded legit to me.

    17. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by countach74 · · Score: 1

      Disagree. I get about 3 day's worth of battery life on my iPhone 4. Texting, some phone calls, e-mail notifications. I've actually been quite pleased with the iPhone battery life, considering it being a smart phone and all. Also, I've had no issues with my charger, which is rather surprising considering that it got kinked pretty good right out of the gate.

    18. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      My Motorola Droid was as stable as I could ever ask for. It's pretty outdated now but sometimes I think about going back to it for the stability. Nobody could understand a word I spoke though it though. I don't think that was Android's fault. There was something with the audio hardware.

      My Samsung Stratosphere the only Verizon phone with 4G & a physical keyboard :-( " sucks. People say I sound way better with it but it's always running slow, locking up, etc... I really want to put Cyanogen or a stock Android with no Samsung baggage on it. They did something proprietary with the radio interface so that cannot be. One thing I still have to try though... replacing the SD card. Often the slowdowns and lockups seem to revolve around accessing the SD card, maybe it is just came with a crappy one.

    19. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by Andy+Prough · · Score: 1

      Samsung here - no such problems. AC is a liar as far as I can tell.

    20. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by Andy+Prough · · Score: 1

      Not sure what your problem is with Samsung, but mine has been incredibly stable.

    21. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      Page will reload itself in 60 seconds...
      <10 seconds pass>
      Page cannot be displayed

    22. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by morgauxo · · Score: 2

      You know... those phones are re-usable. You don't NEED to get a different one for every call!

    23. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by BonThomme · · Score: 4, Funny

      ERROR_SUCCESS !

    24. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The submitter must be a liar also, given the other anecdotal evidence in the comments. There's no need to be so cynical.

    25. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by OffaMyLawn · · Score: 1

      I had the exact issue with my original Motorola Droid. Wife didn't. I'm thinking some of it was just defects. The OS was incredibly stable though.

      I do have an S3 now, and have had no issues with it to date. Not a single lock up. YMMV

    26. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by BlueStraggler · · Score: 1

      Android is probably the most user friendly, but tries to be too similar to a desktop system, and feels slightly clunkly.

      So, it is the most user-friendly for people who expect their phones to behave like clunky desktop systems, then?

    27. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Yes, but most of them were so fucking annoying I couldn't stand to use them after a few months. Also, where I work, I get free demo phones (full retail models that I can try out for a few months).

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    28. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by Andy+Prough · · Score: 1

      Which other anecdotal evidence? One guy appears to maybe have an SD card problem. Several others say no troubles.

    29. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Had the transform and the subsequent model. Once every week or two it would get stuck in airplane mode, and the only thing to fix it was to reboot the phone. It managed to crash once every month or two as well.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    30. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Several other say troubles. There's no way an SD card could have caused my issues (which, btw, I didn't even describe).

      So, maybe some Samsung phones are good, and some suck - most people I've seen have had the issue that they've been unreliable shit. I've only met one person IRL that actually has had good experiences with them. Your evidence is no less anecdotal, yet you are being much more aggressive at calling those that disagree with you liars...

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    31. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by Andy+Prough · · Score: 1

      "most people I've seen have had the issue that they've been unreliable shit". That's not an issue. And the SD card was a different poster. You haven't posted any actual issue. No one else in the comments has posted an actual issue, although one person had to change out a battery. So far, three others in the comments have said theirs worked flawlessly or faultlessly. Since my small business relies in part on Samsung Android phones, I've got good reason to point out when someone is clearly lying in order to denigrate the product in hopes of promoting their own product (HTC or whatever it is that you shill for).

    32. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by SeNtM · · Score: 1

      God damnit...out of mod-points.

      --
      "There ought to be limits to freedom." -George W. Bush
    33. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Well considering how many complaints there are about the cables... count yourself lucky

    34. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows has detected that it just restarted and must restart fot the changes to take effect. Windows will restart in 1 minute.

    35. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by nobodie · · Score: 1

      ditto

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    36. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by submit+your+site · · Score: 1

      So no vocal complaints from me. Love the phone, wish the app ecosystem were a bit better, especially having been on iOS for many years. I suppose I still have my iPad 3 for that!

      yes, no vocal problem from me. i like iOS.

      --
      Submit your Site URL to the Best of the Web Directory.
    37. Re:No issue with my Lumia 920 by submit+your+site · · Score: 1

      ERROR_SUCCESS !

      LOVELY_SUCCESS

      --
      Submit your Site URL to the Best of the Web Directory.
  2. Absolutely not true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have not faced a single, tiny issue with Windows Phone 8. I have not used it for the past 1 month. Actually I have not used it for the past 1 year or even more.

    1. Re:Absolutely not true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't that post supposed to go for (Scrore:5, Funny)?

    2. Re:Absolutely not true... by jkrise · · Score: 1

      True. I didn't want to embarrass myself, so posted Anonymously. But +4 Informative??!!! Looks like the MS shills can't even see such stupid attempts at humour. Clueless bunch of idiots!

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    3. Re:Absolutely not true... by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Nice try, Ballmer.

  3. well... by arsemonkey · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Possibly they will get better quick, I seem to remember my first aneroid device had some pretty odd behavior as well.....

    1. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't remember any android device without problems. My nexus S (running jellybean) keeps removing my widgets from the desktop randomly (I've installed and setup my clock widget at least 20 times now, and i stopped bothering setting up the stocks widget).

    2. Re:well... by symbolset · · Score: 1, Troll

      It's a matter of policy that people employed to bash Android can't actually spell the word correctly in their posts, because that increases the interest level in search engines. So we see Android spelled "Andriod" and other ways, and it's a sure giveaway. "aneroid" is a new one. You get points for that.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    3. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calm down there, nerdrage. See how close the e and d keys are? It was obviously a typo, not a conspiracy.

    4. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a matter of policy that people employed to bash Android can't actually spell the word correctly in their posts

      The transparent jokes used to do the same thing with Google (Goggle etc.) and Ubuntu (Ubonto etc.). It's so obvious it's funny. Good thing Google owns the only search engine that matters.

    5. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least he didn't say Anorrhoid.

    6. Re:well... by doccus · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. aneroids.. saw the doctor about that recently actually..

  4. Freezing, rebooting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...on Windows. Isn't that normal?

    1. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by elabs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not since last decade.

    2. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by crutchy · · Score: 3, Funny

      so you stopped using windows since last decade then?

    3. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seven doesn't really crash at all. Same for SP3 crashes very rarely if ever. Hence "last decade".

      I know I took it to a habit to hibernate my windows machine about four years ago because it doesn't really crash anymore. No need to reboot for any other reason then windows update requiring system restart to apply some updates.

    4. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by crutchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      as much as i hate to admit (must... bag.... microshaft....) i use windows 7 at work and most problems are to do with applications that run on it, not the os itself.

      viruses are still a major problem though (and virus scanners for that matter)

    5. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and this is instability is caused a by????? A bug! You fucking moron

    6. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a bug; it's a feature, you fucking moron.

    7. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      As I pointed above, XP SP3 is pretty much in the same boat. It almost never crashes and only needs to be restarted when updates require it to.

      No idea on mobile windows though, never really used it long enough to form an opinion. Longest time I got to play with WP7/8 was an hour or so messing around with a friend's phone to notice that had less features important to me than my positively ancient nokia 5230.

    8. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by tuppe666 · · Score: 0

      as much as i hate to admit (must... bag.... microshaft....) i use windows 7 at work and most problems are to do with applications that run on it, not the os itself.

      I have machines running only office and nothing else, that run Ubuntu like a charm. That have been nothing but trouble especially wireless.

    9. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by symbolset · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm kind of curious how you got Microsoft Office to boot.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    10. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by crutchy · · Score: 2

      maybe its an easter egg in Office that tuppe666 is the first to discover - that you don't even need windows at all to run Office.

      *trundles off to dig up Office cd to try booting off it* :)

      only two questions remain:

      1. can i play starcraft under the Microsoft Office OS
      2. does it blend?

    11. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by crutchy · · Score: 1

      and this Office OS even has some kind of built-in virtual machine that runs Ubuntu...

    12. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      I've had like two crashes of Windows 7. (Besides Skype 2 years ago, which had a known memory leak and basically after a few days left one slow and sluggish.)

    13. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by quacking+duck · · Score: 2

      I'm kind of curious how you got Microsoft Office to boot.

      If Emacs can be derided as an operating system lacking a good editor, certainly Microsoft Office can be too...

    14. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are error traps in code for crutchy?

    15. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are error traps in code for, crutchy?

    16. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are err traps in code for crutchy?

    17. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by socceroos · · Score: 1

      Be careful though. Apparently, that is nothing but trouble because wireless.

    18. Re:Freezing, rebooting... by crutchy · · Score: 1

      i'm sorry but they won't get your buggy code to work APK... try again :)

      and if you at least call them "exceptions" you might come across as being not such the noob that you are (even if you don't know what an exception actually is)

  5. I don't get it. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why are people complaining?

    They told them they where going to give them windows on a phone. They bought windows on a phone. Random reboots, completely unstable, uses up all resources including battery, the only solution is to wipe it out and start over, and even then you end up with a broken device. Sounds like they managed to port the whole windows experience, I don't get the complains. Maybe it's the lack of a blue screen of dead that's bothering them?

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    1. Re:I don't get it. by elabs · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've had a Windows Phone (7 and then 7.5) and I think I can count the total number of reboots during that time on one hand. It's extremely stable, more so than any other smartphone or even feature phone I've ever owned. I'm excited to get a Windows Phone 8 (probably the 920) but it's a huge rewrite so I would expect a few quirks here and there at first.

    2. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1998 called, they want their Windows complaints back, oddly enough when that stuff was true of Windows OSX still had the problem of apps locking up the whole system, damn that beachball!

    3. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look again, its another one of those "bugs only happens on windows" fucking morons.

    4. Re:I don't get it. by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Please don't confuse a bump in a major version number with a "huge rewrite". It's marketing for "we added more features," no "we've rewritten this for the seventh time."

      Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 still had GDI-related vulnerabilities in WMF/EMF handling left over from the Windows 3.0 days... http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms08-021

    5. Re:I don't get it. by supersat · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they're just upset that they don't have the cool, new, hip calendar that Google invented, which doesn't include the month of December: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=39692

    6. Re:I don't get it. by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Jokes aside, Microsoft had to make the "perfect" phone to fight against iOS and Android. Perfect in a way that that kind of problem (freeze, reboot) doesn't happen - the interface itself is another story. These flaws demonstrate (again) how thick is MS management problem. Ballmer should never have tolerated a phone that buggy to be publicly sold.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    7. Re:I don't get it. by devleopard · · Score: 0

      I was told I can could get Linux on a phone a couple of years ago. I assumed that meant it would be impervious to malware, that I'd have to edit text files using a text mode editor, that I'd have to spend hours tweaking the window manager just to get a GUI, and that I'd have to recompile the kernel to enable new features.

      --
      The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.
    8. Re:I don't get it. by hawguy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Please don't confuse a bump in a major version number with a "huge rewrite". It's marketing for "we added more features," no "we've rewritten this for the seventh time."

      Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 still had GDI-related vulnerabilities in WMF/EMF handling left over from the Windows 3.0 days... http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms08-021

      Windows Phone 7 was based on the WinCE kernel, Windows Phone 8 is based on the WinNT kernel. if that's not a "huge rewrite", I don't know what is.

    9. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please don't confuse a bump in a major version number with a "huge rewrite".

      Except in this case, it was a "huge rewrite". Porting a full-blown desktop kernel to a phone OS with the appropriate UI is a massive undertaking.

    10. Re:I don't get it. by dan_barrett · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've got an LG Optimus 7, running Win phone 7 Mango - it reboots daily, especially while in the "messages" (ie, SMS) app.
      Then again I've read that's common on the LG Optimus specifically.
      I'm using the standard apps, plus Exchange mail integration only.

      When it's not rebooting, as a basic phone + email reader, it's not bad. My old Nokia "dumb" phone also worked fine as a basic phone with twice the standby time.

      I don't think I'll "upgrade" to Windows 8 phone, though

    11. Re:I don't get it. by devleopard · · Score: 1

      While there could be the same internals with new sandboxing, the lack of backwards compatibility for old apps along with new development models suggests to me a LOT of rewrite.

      --
      The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.
    12. Re:I don't get it. by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 2

      Hey, since we're making stability/usability jokes...

      1993 called... they want their OS back.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    13. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless it's Linux. Those tards use the same kernel on desktops, servers, phones, routers... THEY'RE FUCKING CRAZY MAN!!!

    14. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't confuse a bump in a major version number with a "huge rewrite". It's marketing for "we added more features," no "we've rewritten this for the seventh time."

      Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 still had GDI-related vulnerabilities in WMF/EMF handling left over from the Windows 3.0 days... http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms08-021

      "Huge" rewrite is not remotely the same thing as "from scratch"

    15. Re:I don't get it. by crutchy · · Score: 5, Funny

      he tripped over the hole where the start menu used to be

    16. Re:I don't get it. by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      To be fair, not many use it on the desktop.

    17. Re:I don't get it. by JanneM · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh that; it's just the liberal-industrial War on Christmas. Nothing to see, please move along.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    18. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, wince was a rewrite of nt, so it's actually going backwards..

    19. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The way microsoft is doing things, maybe 2013 will be the year of linux on the desktop..

    20. Re:I don't get it. by Microlith · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's less a rewrite and more a port. I imagine they could run Windows Phone on x86, they run Windows 8 on ARM (Windows RT) after all.

      The funny thing is that vulnerabilities affecting Windows 8 may also affect Windows RT and Windows Phone 8. And if it's one they can trace back like the WMF/EMF bug the GP cited...

    21. Re:I don't get it. by luckymutt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Judging by your post history, you're also a blatant Microsoft shill, so nothing you say should ever be taken seriously.

      and with you posting as AC, nothing you say should be taken seriously.

    22. Re:I don't get it. by adolf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But if they wait until it's perfect, then they lose even more mindshare to two very competitive rivals: The domestic US smartphone market is running out of fresh non-preferential users, while the existing user base seems to have binary polarization between Android and iOS in ways that earlier competition between Symbian/Palm/Nokia/Blackberry never produced.

      It's a tough market to get into, just now, and the longer they wait the tougher it gets...

      So I think that in order to succeed, MSFT has to balance timeliness (as above) vs. hardware (wait too long, and your hardware turns stale), vs. software perfection.

      In other words, were MSFT to be perfect at any one of these at the detriment of the other, it would be a far stronger nail in the coffin than a balance of the three.

      And to be very clear: Their competitor's products (iOS and Android) are also far from perfect.

      The question then, as I see it, is this: Did they balance it correctly to capture enough marketshare to sustain further development?

      I personally hope not, given the extraordinary oppressiveness and money-grabbing nature of the walled garden that is Windows 8 on non-x86 platforms (the nature of which was apparently tried-and-tested with the Xbox 360), but I guess we'll see.

    23. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have to admit that they have a history of giving us some damn good reasons to hate them. I was a huge MS supporter from Windows 3.1 up to Windows Vista. After using Windows Mobile and Vista, I realized that Microsoft lost it completely and made the switch (which wasn't something I was looking forward to doing, but now I'm glad that I did). I just got sick of things being so shitty all the time.

      And then there's Internet Explorer.

    24. Re:I don't get it. by crutchy · · Score: 2

      lousy smarch weather.... do not touch willie

    25. Re:I don't get it. by crutchy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ballmer should never be tolerated

      ftfy

    26. Re:I don't get it. by crutchy · · Score: 1

      I was told I can could get Linux on a phone a couple of years ago. I assumed that meant it would be impervious to malware, that I'd have to edit text files using a text mode editor, that I'd have to spend hours tweaking the window manager just to get a GUI, and that I'd have to recompile the kernel to enable new features.

      yeah dammit!... i'm still waiting for mine too

    27. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From what I have read the problem is not with the phone OS, it has been with buggy or faulty hardware. The majority of people don't have problem so really this doesn't demonstrate anything about MS except for perhaps they should do as they have considered and make there own hardware.

    28. Re:I don't get it. by q.kontinuum · · Score: 4, Informative

      Looks like you confuse some things here... from Wikipedia: Windows CE is a distinct operating system and kernel, rather than a trimmed-down version of desktop Windows.[6] It is not to be confused with Windows Embedded Standard which is an NT-based componentized version of desktop Microsoft Windows.

      --
      Trolling is a art!
    29. Re:I don't get it. by tuppe666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The way microsoft is doing things, maybe 2013 will be the year of linux on the desktop..

      Well we already know 2013 is not going to be Windows on the Phone

    30. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you limit your phone to do only simple ios stuff your always going to get bugs.

    31. Re:I don't get it. by symbolset · · Score: 5, Insightful

      2012 is already the year of Linux on the desktop. And the desktop is in your pocket. Android/Linux moved more devices last quarter than Windows devices by a ratio of 3:2. Christmas is coming and by then it will be a clean sweep. By the final reports in February we will know that 2012 was the year that Linux came into its own.

      If some want to cry "Waah! That's not fair! Mobile is not PC." Well suck it up sunshine. If you are a developer this is all that matters: these are the people who will buy your apps. If you make devices this is all that matters: these are the devices that move units. If you sell devices at retail this is all that matters: this is the stuff that doesn't grow dust on the shelf. People buy the devices with Android on over the devices with Windows on by a ratio of 3:2, and the first thing they do after they turn it on is buy apps and content. The only entity in all the world who cares to split this linguistic hair is Microsoft because they want to maintain the illusion that they are still king of this particular hill. But they are not. They don't own the word "PC" either, or it would be PC(R). There were PCs before Microsoft tried to take ownership of this word, and there will be PCs after we have forgotten their long sordid story. These devices are personal, and they compute. They are personal computers. Heck, some of them are more powerful than an early Cray supercomputer - in your pocket.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    32. Re:I don't get it. by symbolset · · Score: 0

      Sadly, no mod points.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    33. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's the lack of a blue screen of dead that's bothering them?

      I'm sure there's more than one app for that.

    34. Re:I don't get it. by X.25 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I've had a Windows Phone (7 and then 7.5) and I think I can count the total number of reboots during that time on one hand. It's extremely stable, more so than any other smartphone or even feature phone I've ever owned. I'm excited to get a Windows Phone 8 (probably the 920) but it's a huge rewrite so I would expect a few quirks here and there at first.

      Wow. You guys are really desperate.

    35. Re:I don't get it. by symbolset · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In case you're wondering, yes: This submission was all about identifying the Microsoft shill accounts, not providing interesting meat for discussion.

      /submitter. You have been /. trolled. Please burn this account and make another.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    36. Re:I don't get it. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      1998 called, they want their Windows complaints back, oddly enough when that stuff was true of Windows OSX still had the problem of apps locking up the whole system, damn that beachball!

      Hey, OS X has improved tremendously of late. Now it doesn't need apps to lock the system up - the OS can do it all by itself.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    37. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't confuse a bump in a major version number with a "huge rewrite". It's marketing for "we added more features," no "we've rewritten this for the seventh time."

      It's marketing speak for "We changed the color, again."

    38. Re:I don't get it. by Nikker · · Score: 2

      So TL;DR

      "Desperate times call for desperate measures"?

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    39. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was told I can could get Linux on a phone a couple of years ago. I assumed that meant it would be impervious to malware, that I'd have to edit text files using a text mode editor, that I'd have to spend hours tweaking the window manager just to get a GUI, and that I'd have to recompile the kernel to enable new features.

      I don't see why you are still waiting. The phone was the Nokia 900 which was released in November 2009 and was followed by the Nokia N9 (September 2011). Sadly the phone line was killed when Nokia entered an alliance with Microsoft. The decision to switch from a linux phone to windows phone has effectively doomed the company as seen by the falling share price, to the point where Nokia is rated by Moody's as junk.

    40. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is hilarious sir. on a side note, just type %ProgramData%\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs into the new toolbar dialog box to fill it back in.

    41. Re:I don't get it. by Dunbal · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, another couple months and none of them will be online anymore since their iOS phones will bankrupt them with random 100+MB data downloads, and then it will be much quieter around here.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    42. Re:I don't get it. by cbhacking · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a matter of fact, the WP7 "emulator" in the built tools is really just an x86-compiled version of the OS running in a VM. I believe the same of the WP8 "emulator" as well. However, aside from the handful of pieces of assembly and other instruction-set-specific code in the kernels, there's nothing very special about being able to do that. In fact, both CE and NT already had x86 ports, so there's not much special about it at all.

      On the other hand, CE and NT are very, very different at higher levels. Although both of them theoretically implement the Win32 API, you'll probably do better porting an app targeting Linux to OpenBSD, or possibly even something more exotic. Yes, they both use POSIX (the same way NT and CE both use Win32) but there's a ton of difference in the details. It may help that NT is close to a superset of CE (porting the reverse direction would be harder) but there's still going to be a fair bit of re-writing involved. CE doesn't really have a concept of user accounts, while they're integral to NT (WP7 had a sort of hacked-together permissions system bolted onto CE, but it bore no resemblance to the NT user account model). WinCE uses a modified FAT filesystem that I'm not even sure there's an NT driver for (it has file modes such as "INROM" which is an indelible read-only attribute, but you can "shadow" the file with a writable one...) while all recent WinNT-based systems use NTFS. CE has a single-rooted filesystem (at least, at the user level) with no drive letters; NTFS has a single-rooted filesystem at the device level, and a DOS-style multi-rooted filesystem at the user level. CE has a bunch of APIs for dealing with things like "CEDB" (CE database) files and mobile functionality, while such things have never been part of NT and would have to either be implemented for it, or the WP7 code that relied on them would have to be re-written. NT drivers and services work differently from CE ones.

      I'm sure a lot of code was re-written. Probably nowhere near all of it, but definitely a lot.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    43. Re:I don't get it. by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      What "lack of backwards compatibility for old apps" are you talking about? WP8 runs WP7 apps just fine. It's a damn good thing it does, too, or there wouldn't have been many launch titles at all (the WP8 SDK was publicly released only at about the same time as the devices themselves).

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    44. Re:I don't get it. by mrclisdue · · Score: 1

      ...just type %ProgramData%\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs into the new toolbar dialog box to fill it back in.

      B-b-but..isn't that like a c-c-command line? That's sooo Linux, and despite millions of people proving otherwise, Linux will n-n-never be ready for the desktop. ...and why are there hashes on your command line?

      chains,

    45. Re:I don't get it. by q.kontinuum · · Score: 1

      2012 is already the year of Linux on the desktop. And the desktop is in your pocket.

      No, it's not. My desktop is on top of my desk, I usually use it when writing EMails, discussing more extensively on websites like e.g. slashdot, programming, writing longer articles, etc. Because it has a good keyboard, a much bigger screen, can use my printer and is far better for productive use.

      This is also the reason I'm using Linux there. While in my pocket I have a Windows Phone 8 device, because it does everything it is supposed to do and does it well.

      --
      Trolling is a art!
    46. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullcrap. A smartphone isn't a PC (Personal Computer), its a PV (Personal Viewscreen). Like a television, you can only consume, not create (cue the apologist rambling about how I can draw doodles with my finger, or talk into like a mic.. how nice!).

    47. Re:I don't get it. by 21mhz · · Score: 2

      2012 is already the year of Linux on the desktop. And the desktop is in your pocket.

      Sorry, but no and no.

      Android is not Linux. It's a convenience fork of the Linux kernel and a few userland libraries, which did a lot to divert Linux development on mobile, because, yeah, Google is special and if it decides to fork a community-run project to suit its corporate needs, everybody should just follow. Not.

      Android is not desktop. I can't use it to do serious work, or even write a good email. I use real desktop Linux for that. Sure, I could spend time to purchase a wireless keyboard and fiddle with that and plugging in a decent sized monitor every time I need it (good luck with the resolution, Android stock resolutions for apps are rather limited), but why the heck?

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    48. Re:I don't get it. by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      Well, by all means don't buy LG next time.
      Too bad Google sourced Nexus 4 from LG, they will get burned.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    49. Re:I don't get it. by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

      I've a Lumia and the only problem I've had with it was caused by a hardware issue that needed an RMA. Browser has crashed out a couple of times but the phone itself is very stable.

      Just wish they'd let you set the ring/alarm and application volumes seperately

    50. Re:I don't get it. by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 2

      If some want to cry "Waah! That's not fair! Mobile is not PC."

      How much of your computing time do you spend on your mobile? Did you even write that comment on it? Mobile phones are taking some focus off the desktop/laptop PCs for sure but you're only kidding yourself if you think it's a replacement.

      --
      throw new NoSignatureException();
    51. Re:I don't get it. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Cool. I have an Android tablet, a TF101, that I bought over a year ago that I use to do all those things. My monitor is a 55" Samsung over HDMI, and the tablet has Citrix so there isn't anything you can do on your PC that I can't do on it. Keyboard? Yes. Mouse? Yes. Office and Outlook? Yes. Manage 100's of servers? Yes. Doing it wherever I happen to be? Yes.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    52. Re:I don't get it. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Keep telling yourself that. It will make you comfortable until The End.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    53. Re:I don't get it. by q.kontinuum · · Score: 1
      Oh, by the way: The Android users are quite known for *not* buying too many apps. Looking at the figures from Apple Marketplace and Google Play, developers earn much better from Apple. (According to http://venturebeat.com/2011/12/09/apple-ios-vs-android-developers-whos-making-more-money/, Android developer earn around 7% of what Apple developers earn. Considering that WP8 is equally closed as Apple, 7% of Apples market share for WP might already be sufficient to give the developers there equal financial incentive.)

      And if you want to compare on that base, you would have to compare the PC Software market volume with the Android Apps market volume. I didn't find the figures in a hurry, but I'd estimate that the market for Windows Desktop software is much, *much* bigger still.

      Android devices are selling better for now in total, but this might change. Loyalty for Android is not that high, developers seem to prefer closed ecosystems, and Windows Phone 8 gets really good reviews. Besides from allegedly being "open", I don't see any advantage of Android over WP8 any more - this was different with WP7. WP8 will not conquer Android on mobile phones any time soon, but I'd be surprised if they couldn't reach double-digit market share during 2013, and for tablets I could well imagine them to supersede Android. And to beat the overall dominance in sold devices, they don't need to win in mobile phones, it's enough to win just a part of that cake. Also please note that Android has big margins on very low-cost devices which are not really fit for extended app-usage, so it would be especially interesting to see the market share in the top 30% of smartphones.

      Personally, I hope Linux will win a part on the desktop, WP8 will win a part of the smartphone market, and customers will win some choice in all segments.

      --
      Trolling is a art!
    54. Re:I don't get it. by q.kontinuum · · Score: 1

      DVD-RW? Probably not. 500GB HD? Quad-Core x86 for development? Probably not. But then you probably still have a "real" machine somewhere doing the actual work.

      --
      Trolling is a art!
    55. Re:I don't get it. by 21mhz · · Score: 2

      Tell me when I will be forced to use Android for all my computing needs or see Android Police kicking down my door. You fanbois are so full of it.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    56. Re:I don't get it. by dissy · · Score: 2

      Hey, since we're making stability/usability jokes...
      1993 called... they want their OS back.

      I keep trying to call 1993 back, but for some reason my phone keeps rebooting...

    57. Re:I don't get it. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      My grandson had taken my primary tablet to play Minecraft with, and my wife was watching Netflix on the backup. So yes, I did crank up the Ubuntu PC for the first time in a few weeks to post that comment. But I didn't have to. I could have done it from my SGS3 phone.

      My tablets get used about 12 hours a day - we fight for possession of them. I burn out my SGS3 phone every day. I have a rail of 4 desktop PCs the kids use all day, and a few Windows laptops that see varying use. We have 3 netbooks and 3 Kindle fires too. What the hell is your point again? Which gets used most? That would be the Android tablets. The other stuff is what you have to get by on when it's not your turn with the tablet.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    58. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your virginity... it's so strong!

    59. Re:I don't get it. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      "Trolling is a art!"

      That was lovely, and I owe you more than "wait and see".

      But I haven't got any more in me tonite than that. It's time for bed. So: "wait and see."

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    60. Re:I don't get it. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      We don't know that the freezing problems are related to the OS though, they might be hardware issues or down to drivers supplied by the phone manufacturer or OEMs.

      With any product shipping hundreds of thousands of units you won't have to look far to find people complaining about bugs and freezing. No-one has perfect quality control during manufacturing, no-one can debug and test every corner case before the first release. Stories like this are meaningless without reliable statistics to back them up.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    61. Re:I don't get it. by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      1993 called...

      Oh my god, did you warn them?!?!

    62. Re:I don't get it. by 21mhz · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, CE and NT are very, very different at higher levels. Although both of them theoretically implement the Win32 API, you'll probably do better porting an app targeting Linux to OpenBSD, or possibly even something more exotic. Yes, they both use POSIX (the same way NT and CE both use Win32) but there's a ton of difference in the details. It may help that NT is close to a superset of CE (porting the reverse direction would be harder) but there's still going to be a fair bit of re-writing involved.

      I used to develop a codebase that worked on both Windows Mobile and the desktop. If you targeted the common subset of Win32, MFC, or ATL/WTL, didn't assume your file paths start with "C:" (which is a bad assumption anyway), and optionalized the platform-exclusive stuff, it was quite OK. There were some annoying quirks on CE, for example, no two DLLs in your process could have the same file name. Maybe the right way was to start on CE or both, then making it work everywhere wasn't that difficult.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    63. Re:I don't get it. by siliconwafer · · Score: 1

      That's a shame. I've had an HTC Radar for about a year, running Win Phone 7 Mango, and I can't recall a single spontaneous reboot. Compared to the other phones on the market, I find the UI to be more usable. I'm able to go three days on a single charge with light use, or a day and a half with normal to heavy use. I gave up my Android-based phone, which was running Cyanogen Mod, for this and I haven't looked back. My only gripe? Lack of apps, but it's getting better and everything I *need* is there.

      Yeah, my techie friends ripped on me for going to Windows. Whatever. I wanted something that just worked, didn't have a lot of app crashes, and gave me great battery life. I found it.

    64. Re:I don't get it. by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      Not being a developer, I've got to ask: Is the OS that important in developing APPs? It would seem to me that the tools developers use are the key to APP production. How many development tools require the use of the OS's command line or the OS's graphical user interface other than to open a tool or save the resulting code?

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    65. Re:I don't get it. by llZENll · · Score: 1

      As a developer who wants to eat I don't give a shit who sells the most devices, what I care about is which users actually pay for software. Ask ANY who distribute on multiple platforms and Android is in dead last, not by some fraction, but by a huge margin. The last report I saw iOS generates over 90% of ALL mobile software revenue. Granted there are ways to leverage Android where most expect everything free, but don't kid yourself into thinking it is a perfect system. Because of this nearly all innovation and novelty appears on iOS first then is ported to Android if successful, even knowing they a smash hit some developers still fail to monetize their app on Android.

    66. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are there error traps in code for crutchy?

    67. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crutchy what are error traps in code for?

    68. Re:I don't get it. by MrSenile · · Score: 1

      DVD off android? Yea, it's actually supported http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/26/samsung-intros-worlds-thinnest-external-dvd-writer/

      500G HD? Funny enough, also mountable through usb http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/19/3167527/paragon-ntfs-hfs-android-app


      Quad-Core x86? Yup, it's also not a 'real machine'. It's a virtual machine, on you know, a server that I can then access via ssh, citrix, xwindow support, or many other methods.

      Good try on the troll, and marks for good points, but I have to give you a C- overall.

    69. Re:I don't get it. by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1

      In my house it's exactly the opposite. My Kindle Fire sits on my desk while I use the desktop. I've had a few tablets. They never saw much use and were sold. My wife had free reign of her choice. She wouldn't touch them either.

    70. Re:I don't get it. by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      You need to re-read his comment. PC is an acronym for "personal computer," which a phone certainly is. A desktop computer is a PC, but a PC is not a desktop computer. A dog is a four legged animal, but a four legged animal is not a dog. A desktop is only one form of personal computer today, unlike fifteen years ago when PCs were all desktops. And as he points out, a phone is more powerful than the most powerful supercomputer that existed in 1970.

    71. Re:I don't get it. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I've got an LG

      There's your problem right there. I had an LG phone about ten years ago. It was fine for a month or two, then started getting flaky. Weird flaky, like the screen rendering backwards, upside down, or colors reversed. I sent it back under warrantee and the replacement was even worse.

      Needless to say, I won't be buying any more LG electronics.

    72. Re:I don't get it. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      From what I have read the problem is not with the phone OS, it has been with buggy or faulty hardware.

      Which is one reason I'd shy away from an MS phone. I realize that it's possible this rewrite will fix things for them, but Windows was never the least bit tolerant of hardware faults.

      Several years ago I was running XP and Mandriva dual-boot, Windows was really flaky. I'd get bluescreens, reboots, all sorts of troubles and kept cursing MS for being buggy, until Linux quit -- the power supply had been going out for quite a while.

      I got a notebook a few years ago with W7, had it dual-booting with kubuntu. When it was set to hibernate when the lid was closed on battery but do nothing on AC and you closed the lid and plugged it in, it wouldn't restart without pulling the battery. It gave both OSes fits, but killed Windows.

      Thankfully, the notebook was stolen and the replacement didn't have that problem.

      But again, Windows is NOT tolerant of flaky hardware, and Linux is, making Android a better choice.

    73. Re:I don't get it. by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1

      So you can do your day job on an Android tablet you say? Did I read that right?

      My point is for real work, tablets, phones, etc, just don't cut it. They're a nice addition to have but no replacement or even close.

      --
      throw new NoSignatureException();
    74. Re:I don't get it. by socceroos · · Score: 1

      Same! Got the TF700T. Amazing device and as you've pointed out, covers all the bases and covers them well.

    75. Re:I don't get it. by Mr0bvious · · Score: 2

      I agree that an Android device (or whatever competitor device you prefer) is not a replacement for your dev pc, but I'd wager that the vast majority of people who purchased PC before the explosion of smart phones did not use their PC like you or I. They used it for browsing the web, facebook, email, youtube, etc.

      I'll also wager that the smart phones have most certainly replaced the PC for the vast majority of these users. Most PC owners used them to consume not create, and for that the smart phones and tablets are now the standard for these people.

      Are they more productive? Probably not. Are they cheaper, easier to administer, better battery life (compared to laptops), more convenient? I'd say so... Not to mention, they are oh so more trendy!

      So without being all technical, I'd be happy to claim that Android style devices have in fact already replaced the PC for the common person (who I'm sure are the vast majority of device purchasers).

      --
      Never happened. True story.
    76. Re:I don't get it. by crutchy · · Score: 1

      linux will never have a start menu... that would be blasphemous

    77. Re:I don't get it. by adolf · · Score: 1

      Likewise, laptops also make fine servers, as long as you don't need much hardware expansion, and are willing to live with the fact that your once-portable computing device is now hard-tethered to a network (and whether that network consists of Ethernet or USB, it's still a net work of wires).

      Come and see me when your Android tablet is doing realtime 1080p video transcoding -- by then, my desktop will be greedily munging 4k video with ease.

      There is a place for pocket computers. And there is a possibility for them to actually supplant desktop computers. But not in 2013, and certainly not in 2014 either. Maybe not even before I die...

      And I, for one, loathe using computers on my own 52" LCD. It's not any technological limitation (my TV has quite low latency and very good colorspace), it's just hard to focus on something that is either across the room or so close and huge that I have to turn my head to see the whole thing.

    78. Re:I don't get it. by crutchy · · Score: 1

      they sure as hell won't make APK's buggy posted code interpret correctly

      "error traps" (programmers that aren't complete noobs like APK call them exception handlers) are mostly for handling bad inputs (such as if a user enters a bunch of letters in a field that is converted to an integer)

      using them merely to show a more friendly message box than the usual Windows exception dialog in case there's a program bug is just poor form

    79. Re:I don't get it. by adolf · · Score: 1

      I burn out my SGS3 phone every day.

      I burn out my desktop...never, actually.

      "OMG! It's so great that the battery goes flat every fucking day!" is not a feature, it's a curse.

    80. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck android. Maybe if google wasn't such a little bitch about it's privacy policy now, but honestly fuck having an advertising company write my linux distribution.

    81. Re:I don't get it. by crutchy · · Score: 1

      why are there hashes on your command line?

      this was probably just a joke that whooshed me, but % is actually called a percent, not a hash, and %ProgramData% is reference to an environment variable.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_variable#Examples_from_Microsoft_Windows

      linux slashes are also the other way around from windows
      eg (linux): /etc/hosts eg (windows/ms-dos): c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts

    82. Re:I don't get it. by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Android is not Linux

      Your repeating it in another thread will not make it true. As discussed in this one, Android is very much Linux. There is no "linux userland" in the real world, it might exist in your oxymoron-filled world along with dry liquid water.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    83. Re:I don't get it. by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      There is no "linux userland" in the real world

      Oh obscurant Android fan, please look here or here. Then tell me what percentage of that can run on Android.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    84. Re:I don't get it. by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      What can run where doesn't tell you what is Linux and what is not. Something is Linux if it is, you know, Linux. May be locked down to run nothing at all, it still remains Linux.

      Except in your imagination where there is a Linux userland, and water is dry.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    85. Re:I don't get it. by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      A direct download and compile from kernel.org will also not be able to run a vast majority of these software that you point to.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    86. Re:I don't get it. by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      It will run many, and those packages that won't run as is, will run after compiling them on a bootstrapped and dependency-provisioned environment.

      With Android kernel, it's going to be trickier: there are behavioral changes in the kernel, and I bet Google dropped some options important in other usages, because who cares about those.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    87. Re:I don't get it. by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      Something is Linux if it is, you know, Linux.

      Sorry, circular definitions somehow fail to fascinate me.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    88. Re:I don't get it. by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Your own argument is circular too, but you yourself don't understand your argument so you don't realize it.

      You have assumed Fedora and Debian are Linux, and anything that runs their software is Linux. But you fail to understand what originally made Fedora and Debian Linux. It is the inclusion of a kernel derived from Linux kernel. That same thing makes Android also Linux, without any need to be compatible with Fedora and Debian. Fedora and Debian are not gold standards of Linux, it is, as the name suggests, Linux kernel.

      On lines similar to yours, one could assume only Debian is Linux and refuse to believe Fedora is Linux because it doesn't directly run Debs.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    89. Re:I don't get it. by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      It will not run many, vast majority depends on libc and the like.

      Your argument was about it running the software, nowhere was a dependency requirement mentioned.

      1. If dependencies are allowed, Android kernel can surely run all the software, by a simple wrapper around it to translate. As libc is a dependency for Fedora, the wrapper is a dependency for Android kernel.

      The debian distribution with BSD kernel can run more of those software from source than the vanilla Linux kernel can. So debian/BSD is "more" Linux than Linux itself?

      2. What makes Fedora and Denial Linux? On similar lines to yours, one could make the argument that since fedora and debian cannot run android software, fedora and debian are not Linux. That would be as wrong as your argument to the converse.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    90. Re:I don't get it. by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      It will not run many, vast majority depends on libc and the like.

      Your argument was about it running the software, nowhere was a dependency requirement mentioned.

      Right, let's try to muddle the issue with inane definition games. Of course most software requires its dynamic libraries since 1990s, smartass.

      Actually, libc from either Fedora or Debian would work on the pristine kernel if dropped in from the binary package. So yes, many binaries will run unchanged when their dependencies are present in the system.

      1. If dependencies are allowed, Android kernel can surely run all the software, by a simple wrapper around it to translate.

      Oh, we're talking about a "simple" wrapper now. Does such a wrapper exist?

      2. What makes Fedora and Denial Linux?

      Near total compatibility with the upstream Linux kernel, of course. But I'm giving up on trying to make you acknowledge this, you don't seem to be in for factual discussion.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    91. Re:I don't get it. by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Oh. So where does your imaginary "Linux userland" fit into this worldview? Hope dry water also finds a place.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    92. Re:I don't get it. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      You're thinking Windows and the BSA. Android/Linux doesn't have that problem either.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    93. Re:I don't get it. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Once upon a time phones were not personal computers. But now personal computers powered by battery, with apps and cellular voice capability also are phones. The two things converged. To say that an iPhone 5 or an SGS 3 is not a personal computer is just stupid. It insults the listener. The thing is personal, and it computes. It is a personal computer. To argue opposing this is to betray a bias for your employer because words mean things.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    94. Re:I don't get it. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Yes. Actually I can do my day job on my SGS III phone mostly, and Android tablet for almost all of the rest. The Android tablet just makes it easier because the screen is bigger and my eyes are old. I can remote into hundreds of servers, research problems on Google, do Citrix to log into our trouble ticket management system and work with those perniciously incompatible Office documents on my XP/W7 desktop VMs. And I can do it remotely via VPN and 4G hotspot. My crew chiefs report in person or communicate via SMS.

      What I need a Windows VM for is for the ridiculously stupid HP training website that demands that not only do you use IE, but you do it with admin privileges. Fortunately my admins can build that in Citrix too, and I can do that from my Android tablet without any fear that it's going to hose up my tablet. We can always revert the VM after it's been hosed up.

      /HP should be really ashamed of their web presence.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    95. Re:I don't get it. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      It's new. I've been meaning to get to the store and buy the double life aftermarket battery and I will. I've been busy. Cut me some slack.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    96. Re:I don't get it. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      If you are an app developer and know what a Von Neumann architecture and a "Turing complete" machine is, then no, you can move your app anywhere anytime. If you grew up in the .NET world there will be a learning curve.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    97. Re:I don't get it. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      The iOS money curve had to do with installed base. Android installed based just came even with iOS last June, on a curve to treble it by next June. Before there was little Android installed base relative to iOS, and now there is superlative installed base relative to iOS so Android has more people to buy your apps. This trend is expected to continue until Android has 2,3,10x more customers for your app because Android is moving 5x the units iOS is on a curve that takes them to infinity x.

      Short story: your market data is old. Not your fault. This stuff is moving quick.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    98. Re:I don't get it. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Unlike Windows the ability to force the end user to use the software is not a goal. To entice is, but enticing and forcing are different things.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    99. Re:I don't get it. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      What matters is not what app runs on which. What matters is what platform most empowers its buyer to achieve his human goals. That is why we buy your shit.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    100. Re:I don't get it. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Oh, the Kindle fire. Maybe you should put some books in it. Do you want a recommend?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    101. Re:I don't get it. by adolf · · Score: 1

      No.

  6. thanks for asking by slashmydots · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My Samsung Character R640 running Symbian is working absolutely flawlessly and is getting battery life of approx 2 weeks. Thanks for asking about Symbian in that summary.

    1. Re:thanks for asking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Character, being part of the R-series of low-end CDMA devices destined for carriers such as MetroPCS and US Cellular runs Qualcomm's BREW operating system with TouchWiz Lite as the overlay. Samsung and Nokia never officially ported Symbian to CDMA, Samsung were never allowed to outside of Korea, per the terms of their previous deal with Nokia/Symbian Ltd and Nokia's hostile attitude towards Qualcomm on CDMA patent licensing prevented CDMA Symbian devices from being actively developed for the US.

    2. Re:thanks for asking by KiwiSurfer · · Score: 0

      People still use Symbian?!

    3. Re:thanks for asking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yep. I know several Nokia E52 users (not a very smart phone, has buttons, has battery life), who have a "from my cold dead hands" attitude about it.

    4. Re:thanks for asking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It's a burning platform. All Symbian users rushed off of the platform and every one of them became a WP8 user. There are still some Symbians in use, because the 920s have been sold out all over the world for years now, so there's still a line-up to jump off the burning platform.

    5. Re:thanks for asking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This not even a smartphone. You need wireless network at least.

      This is far worse than my last Symbian device. You know, we are not in the 90s anymore. :)

    6. Re:thanks for asking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story is about smartphones...

    7. Re:thanks for asking by alexgieg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      People still use Symbian?!

      Well, I still use PalmOS.

      My general policy towards gadgets is to only replace them when they've completely broken or when the cost of repair isn't worth it anymore. After all, why replace something that's still doing well what it's supposed to? My guess most Symbian users have a similar attitude.

      So, only once my trusty PalmOS device gives up I'll look into whatever good is available and switch, not a moment earlier.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    8. Re:thanks for asking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same. My Symbian phone has crashed exactly twice in three years. People who buy this Android/iPhone/Windows 8 "smart" crap get exactly what they deserve.

    9. Re:thanks for asking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      WP is downgrade from Symbian.

    10. Re:thanks for asking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Nokia stopped making Linux phones.

    11. Re:thanks for asking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, your antiquated device still does what it was designed to do. New devices are designed to do much more.
      My commodore 64 still does what it was supposed to do. I replaced it just the same.
      Your happy, that's fine. It's not interesting.
      Rather, your righteousness is unfounded and, frankly, slightly nauseating.

    12. Re:thanks for asking by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      The majority of the phones in the US run Symbian.

    13. Re:thanks for asking by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      People still use Symbian?!

      Yes. The latest Asha line of models from Nokia is quite good. They've put good build quality and decent features into ~100 EUR devices. They've also mixed in features from other kinds of phones, such as QWERTY physical keyboards and Exchange support from business phones, or touch screens and Youtube video playback from smartphones. The screen resolutions are crappy, but it's suprising how well a small package of features can satisfy a casual user. And the S40 app support is also suprisingly solid.

      To give you an example, I've asked a friend who has an Asha 302, here's what they do with it off the top of my head: web browsing with Opera Mini (mostly feed/news reading, checking forecast, Googling or Wikipedia); Exchange sync (email, calendar, contacts) for work; email support for popular providers (Yahoo, Google) as well as custom accounts (including stuff like secure IMAP etc.); Google Maps, Skype, Facebook, Shazam, YouTube; data-texting with Skype, Viber or WhatsApp; snapping pics and video (crappy quality, but bearable); music player and FM radio; apparently there's also MobiPocket (ebook reader) available for S40. She also has some obscure little S40 games she's been carrying around for years from phone to phone.

      And of course it's 90% about talking and texting on the phone, all the above is only the other 10%. I guess that's what makes the difference. Some people want the phone to be just a phone, mostly.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    14. Re:thanks for asking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all, why replace something that's still doing well what it's supposed to?

      Because the new phones do so much more and do it quicker. It's more about the opportunity cost. Once the new gadgets often enough value difference between them and your current devices and this value difference is equal to the cost of the new product. You should buy it. Give that you use PalmOS, I think you've approached this value.

    15. Re:thanks for asking by KiwiSurfer · · Score: 1

      The majority of the phones in the US run Symbian.

      Do you have a source for this? I personally find this hard to believe.

  7. HTC 8X Here, loving it by nomaddamon · · Score: 1

    Had it for a bit under a week, so far no glitches and I'm really loving it!

    1. Re:HTC 8X Here, loving it by elabs · · Score: 1

      Sweet! Good to hear!

    2. Re:HTC 8X Here, loving it by crutchy · · Score: 1

      omg you haven't dropped it and smashed the screen yet!?
      such a noob

    3. Re:HTC 8X Here, loving it by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      Every phone and every OS has its problems, and happy users probably aren't as vocal; it would be good to know how Windows Phone users who are also iOS and Android users compare them for reliability.

      Jesus Christ since when has a Slashdot submission on Microsoft software having issues actually been even handed about it?!

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    4. Re:HTC 8X Here, loving it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noobs like you omit error trapping in their code crutchy. What are error traps for?

  8. This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    They're getting all the Microsoft shills to post in defense of this knowing they're the only ones that would claim to own a Windows 8 phone.

    1. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i still get a kick out of those 'microsoft shills' comments, especially given the rabid defence of apple and google everytime they blame their users, invade privacy and bring frivolous lawsuits, glad to see you're all stuck in 1998, meanwhile the world passed you by...enjoy living in the past, hope these posts satiate your microsoft hate.

    2. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The difference is that it is believable that there are Apple and Google fans/users on Slashdot. The idea that there are Microsoft fans or users on Slashdot is just tough to accept, like if you told us a unicorn was posting to Slashdot.

    3. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by mevets · · Score: 1

      Would you like a tissue?

    4. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The idea that there are Microsoft fans or users on Slashdot is just tough to accept

      yeah i know, those so invested in the beliefs of a reality long past do have significant difficulty accepting change, denial is just one of the stages.

    5. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 3, Informative

      Considering most of the supporters of Microsoft (dare I say "fanboys") have REALLY high UID's or are anonymous cowards.... yes, it is hard to believe, and it is hard to understand why after all the years of abuse from the Linux/Apple crowd the Microsoft fans would continue to come in and spend most of their time defending their fanboyness to people who wouldn't use windows if it came with a blowjob from Selma Hayek.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    6. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by 0123456 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The idea that there are Microsoft fans or users on Slashdot is just tough to accept, like if you told us a unicorn was posting to Slashdot.

      To be fair, most people of clue have abandoned Slashdot over the last year or three. Before long it probably will just be a site for Microsoft shills to tell each other how wonderful Windows is.

    7. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by scdeimos · · Score: 5, Funny

      it is hard to understand why after all the years of abuse from the Linux/Apple crowd the Microsoft fans would continue to come in and spend most of their time defending their fanboyness to people who wouldn't use windows if it came with a blowjob from Selma Hayek.

      Tempting.

    8. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by blavallee · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That would be the only reason I would even consider returning to windows.

    9. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by hairyfish · · Score: 1

      Considering most of the supporters of Linux/Apple (dare I say "fanboys") have REALLY high UID's or are anonymous cowards.... yes, it is hard to believe, and it is hard to understand why after all the years of abuse from the Microsoft crowd the Linux/Apple fans would continue to come in and spend most of their time defending their fanboyness to people who wouldn't use windows if it came with a blowjob from Selma Hayek. See how that works?

    10. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering most of the supporters of Microsoft (dare I say "fanboys") have REALLY high UID's or are anonymous cowards.... yes, it is hard to believe

      Yes times change, i acknowledged that for people like you it is hard to accept change, you'll move out of denial soon, the new breed isn't as encumbered by fanboyism, we're much more objective. i have a windows pc, 3 macs, a nexus 7 and an iphone and i'll drop any of those for something better regardless of who makes it.

      and it is hard to understand why after all the years of abuse from the Linux/Apple crowd the Microsoft fans would continue to come in and spend most of their time defending their fanboyness

      i don't know, maybe it is hoped those particular apple/linux fans have gone beyond their abuse-hurling insecurities, but fact is objective criticism is hard to come by and those particular fans project their insecurities with baseless vitriol, in fact if you turn the discussion to a point on apple or google those fans will turn on eachother, but in microsoft-related posts they are frothing at the mouth to the point they can't even articulate any valid critical point anymore, it's just 'you're a shill' and 'fuck m$'. but i suppose if that's how you prefer the comments in these stories to look that's fine too.

    11. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by crutchy · · Score: 1

      i'd go back to windows if it came with a blowjob from dilbert.

      anything else is still just second rate.

    12. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by dbIII · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually it doesn't since this place grew out of Rob Malda's linux and enlightenment window manager app pages, so that's a fairly epic fail above.
      The "you do too" arguments really should have been left behind when people were old enough that they couldn't easily fit in the sandpit to play with the other kindergarden children, which is why sleazy bastards in politics go for the premptive strike accusing their opponents of the flaws they demonstrate above. They know that any rational pointing out that the accuser is themselves guilty is going to look like a childish sandpit argument long before anyone considers whether it is actually true or not.

    13. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah who would use stupid windows 8 when every one knows ios is the greatest and android is for the budget people.

    14. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by 21mhz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Um, can't you see a pattern here: somebody fresh on Slashdot starts posting and quickly exposes opinions that are insufficiently anti-Microsoft. He gets barked at by a few zealots who point out his high UID as something that makes him deficient (I mean six digits, must be a total bandwagon jumper), then he gets modded down regardless of the validity of his comment. The person shrugs and leaves it to the neckbeards.

      If that's what the majority of people here actually wants, fine. But then the motto should be "News for Linux neckbeards. Other stuff doesn't matter."

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    15. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by DudemanX · · Score: 4, Informative

      I haven't had a Windows Phone since 6.1(which was meh) but I do enjoy running Windows 8 on my desktop and have enjoyed almost every Windows version since Windows 95b except for ME(yes, even Vista). Is my UID low enough to be taken at face value?

    16. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aha, we finally know who won the slashdot anniversary competition to get a low UID !

    17. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by q.kontinuum · · Score: 5, Insightful
      My UID is smaller than yours! (Feels somehow wrong, bragging that way :-/...)

      I'm definitely not an MS fanboy, but my opinion on Linux usability changed a bit over the past couple of years as well. I work (as I disclosed in some posts earlier) for Nokia and might be biased for that reason, and therefore also feel targeted by your claims. Still, I'm running Linux on my desktop and laptop at home, I didn't recommend WP7(.5) as an alternative for Android or iPhone for Power-Users (even though I might have recommended the UI), because I stick to my own opinion and I don't want to burn my reputation, here or elsewhere, out of wrong sense of loyalty to my employer. But I also couldn't recommend Android or iPhone, because my enthusiasm for Open Source is driven by my enthusiasm for people to own their own data and devices.

      Windows Phone 8 is the first system I do recommend usability- and feature-wise as an alternative to Android or iOS. Since I was able to use a Lumia 820 for test purpose for some time, I can also claim that the stability is OK (Since I test versions under development, my experience might not match the consumer experience, but should be expected to be rather more unstable. Still, while it was not perfect yet I admit, it is quite good. I have some friends using Android and saw more reboots on their devices).

      From a privacy point of view I still think, MeeGo would have been better because an Open Source System can be reviewed to check which data is transmitted to whom, but the WP8 concepts are still an improvement compared to Android or iPhone. And while Android might be theoretically open source, this argument is moot for a locked phone with pre-compiled version and closed source drivers in kernel space.

      Since in WP8 each contact is associated to an account, the different accounts are never merged. That's the reason WP is afaik the first mobile phone system capable to properly manage multiple active sync accounts. If I want contacts to be only on my phone, I just configure a fake account with invalid server name and associate contacts with this account => they will not be synchronized. Very simple, very straight-forward, but a hack; however, the new API should allow to implement a local phonebook which will be fully integrated in peoples hub without synchronizing it to any server. I'd expect such an app to be available soon, also I'm not particularly waiting for it. The better solution is to configure my own ActiveSync-Server. In my case it is Zarafa on Fedora17 and can be reached via dynamic dns name; if you can't have your computer online 24/7, setting it up at home and attaching it to a WLAN router is also a viable option.

      Even though I do love the technical side of the N9 and was quite sad that the system was abandoned in favour of WP, I do understand the reasoning behind, and I also understand the decision to go for WP rather than Android, even though WP7 was not competitive enough and WP8 still a year away: It would have been quite difficult to establish Nokia Maps on Android in spite of the better map data and better feature sets, because Google is quite protective of their own services. (http://thisismynext.com/2011/05/12/google-android-skyhook-lawsuit-motorola-samsung/)

      --
      Trolling is a art!
    18. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by mSparks43 · · Score: 1

      how do I find my uid?

      never mind

    19. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a shill shill...

    20. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you will call me a shill so i wont use my account, but i like windows. You have to pick your version a little, but it always did a pretty good job at coping with what i threw at it.

    21. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well as much as it's got its faults there are some good stories here about science, tech, linux, and there are some really smart people writing comments. I just happen to not hate windows as well. You have to pick your versions and a lot of times your better off with linux, but windows has let me do pretty cool shit over the years. Why your all still kicking the puppy MS, when privacy from google has all but vanished, and apple just makes a pretty linux and a grid of shortcuts, is all but beyond me.

    22. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Artefacto · · Score: 2

      Since in WP8 each contact is associated to an account, the different accounts are never merged. That's the reason WP is afaik the first mobile phone system capable to properly manage multiple active sync accounts. If I want contacts to be only on my phone, I just configure a fake account with invalid server name and associate contacts with this account => they will not be synchronized

      Not sure what you're saying here, but in Android you can synchronize data contacts from multiple accounts and have local, non-synchronized contacts without hacks. The same applies to other classes of data like events, tasks, e-mail, etc. Lookup account authenticators and sync providers in the android docs.

    23. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Kludge · · Score: 1

      Is my UID low enough to be taken at face value?

      Almost. :) But then you blow all credibility with this:

      enjoyed almost every Windows version since Windows 95b

      !!! Holy hell, man, "Windows 95" was a steaming pile of crap. It is what drove me to Linux in the first place, and I never looked back.

      That said, I'm thinking that for the first time in history MS has some competition, which may force them to really try to make 8 a functional OS.

    24. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How to get a blowjob from Salma Hayek ?

      Its that a new Microsoft promotional program ?

      Where do i sign ?

    25. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by q.kontinuum · · Score: 1

      This is the point: You synchronize contacts from multiple accounts, they either end up being synchronized to one account or they are only local contacts on your phone which are lost when you reboot, right? When you add a new contact, it will be automatically assigned to your main account, you can not chose to which phonebook it should belong, correct? In WP, you can have your live account, as many ActiveSync accounts as you like, Facebook, whatever. And when you add a contact it will ask you for which account it is. When you delete an account from WP8 settings, your phonebook is not cluttered with all the obsolete contacts from that account any more. If someone enters data (birthday, personal notes, whatever) to his Facebook account, it will show in your WP people hub, but not be merged to your Outlook phonebook, even if you have the same person there. I might be wrong since I don't have an Android device, only some other smartphones.

      --
      Trolling is a art!
    26. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Artefacto · · Score: 1

      they either end up being synchronized to one account or they are only local contacts on your phone which are lost when you reboot, right?

      If by "reboot", you mean "factory reset", then yes. You can merge multiple accounts into the same contact (called "join contacts" in android), but if you factory reset those merges are not preserved. Google contacts and Google+ contacts are automatically merged though, at least in Jelly Bean. And to answer another point you make -- when you join contacts, data is not copied between the several accounts.

      When you add a new contact, it will be automatically assigned to your main account, you can not chose to which phonebook it should belong, correct? In WP, you can have your live account, as many ActiveSync accounts as you like, Facebook, whatever. And when you add a contact it will ask you for which account it is.

      No, it works the same way in Android. When you create a contact, it asks you to which account you want to save it to (Phone, SIM, Google, Exchange, etc.). I'm not sure what happens you delete an account as I'm not inclined to test it, but I suppose it's up to the account implementation whether to leave the data there unmanaged or to delete it.

      In sum, there doesn't seem to be difference between Android and WP8 in this regard.

    27. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Nite_Hawk · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I still remember how I switched. I was trying to get Windows 95 to back up some files on my hard drive to tape using their goofy backup software. To make a long story short, Windows 95 ultimately ended up corrupting my hard drive and the backup. It was at that point that I switched to OS/2 for a while, then slackware, then redhat, then debian. I stuck with debian for a while, then switched to ubuntu and have been mostly ubuntu since. For a while I had a windows or OSX partition for games, but in the last year or so I haven't bothered since wine+native has been good enough. I haven't looked back.

    28. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did someone mention low UIDs?

      Win95 was a clever OS. It managed to advance the UI and several other things, while maintaining an amazing level of backward compatibility.

      Sure, it wasn't 'good' in an objective sense, but objective senses aren't what matters in the real world. It was the right OS at the right time, as Microsoft's success for the next decade rather illustrates.

      I think people forget how shit all the other OSes were in those days, too...

    29. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I get that SP for Win7 please?

      Anon in case wife reads /.

    30. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Tom · · Score: 1

      My UID is smaller than yours! (Feels somehow wrong, bragging that way :-/...)

      yes

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    31. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by q.kontinuum · · Score: 1

      In sum, there doesn't seem to be difference between Android and WP8 in this regard.

      There remains the difference that only one ActiveSync account is supported in Android (At least it was when I last searched on this topic) - which is a problem for me. I have my own ActiveSync server at home and the company server configured. Can you also link contacts in Android? In PeopleHub you can mark different contacts from different accounts as linked, so only one combined account will appear in your contact list, summarizing all information from both accounts. However, the information is not merged to any of the accounts.

      --
      Trolling is a art!
    32. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Artefacto · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can have several ActiveSync accounts, at least in my Samsung Jellybean ROM. And you can join contacts -- see my post above.

    33. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by zerocool512 · · Score: 1

      Hi!

      --
      If techs didn't disagree with each other, then Microsoft would rule the world.
    34. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      95 OSR2 wasn't nearly as bad as the initial release of 95. In retrospect, it was a steaming pile of donkey shit, but at the time it was actually pretty good by comparison, though most of that came from the Microsoft monoculture: If you wanted to be able to game, then you didn't really have much of a choice.

      I dual booted 95 and Slackware for a while... using 95 for gaming, and Slackware for actual work. It wasn't actually until NT4 SP4 came out that I was able to actually have a Windows system that didn't need to dual boot, because NT had the stability... SP3 had DirectX too, but it was glitchy. SP4 was actually usable for gaming, and it improved a lot in W2K... then XP came out, and the rest is history.

    35. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I'd imagine it also includes a lot of people who don't give a shit about Microsoft but facepalms at the stupidity whenever they hear this 'M$ has an army of employees just to troll /.' nonsense. You honestly believe that? Christ, you people are naive, or stuck in 2001, I'm not sure which.

      - AC, although a /. reader since 2000.

    36. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by R_Harrold · · Score: 1

      Actually, Windows 95 was a significant improvement over Windows for Workgroups 3.12. Yes it had some failings compared to Unix, but compared to what preceded it there was significant improvement. Every OS out there falls short of being good if you compare it against an OS with different design goals (Venturing outside the computer world a ferarri truly sucks when compared with a dumptruck due to it's inability to efficiently carry rubble and tendency to catastrophically fail when you attempt to use it in more than 1 inch of mud). I realize I don't have a number that's low enough to qualify as legitimate on /. , but I also agree with DudemanX in that I have enjoyed using most of the Windows operating systems since Windows 95, though since 2000 I've spent more time on the server side than on the client side. I've also owned/used every version of the Windows Mobile/Windows Phone OS, as well as Blackberry and the occasional Android device. They all have their flaws and if you dig enough you'll find an ugly baby (Bugs/Lockups/Reboots/Poor signal) in almost every product during the first several months after release. All that being said, Windows Phone 8 looks like a pretty good setup, and yes I've run into some bugs with my Lumia 920, but I'm looking forward to where it is going. FYI: Yes I am a MS drone, no I am not in marketing or product development and no, I am not a MS shill. Robert

    37. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      Either this, or the so called "shills" are actually simply trolls. The responses to these posts are so predictable and so numerous it's really like shooting fish in a barrel.

    38. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Isis242 · · Score: 1

      Hopefully I can post this without Chrome crashing on my Android. I love the succession of Androids I've had for the most part but I've definitely had some duds. Aside from the navigation sucking so terribly I really like the 920 my husband just bought. Doesn't seem any buggier than any other phone I've had and you can actually delete all of AT&T's crapware.

    39. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      I have Slashdot in my newsfeed for the science and technology post. I don't normally comment on these posts because of my lack of understanding of some of the topics, and honestly, as of late the number of +5 insightful/informative comments in such stories has receded and what's left is +5 funny geek jokes.

      But compared to most any other site, this one has a disproportionately high number of article trolling or flaming Microsoft products. I own a number of Microsoft products and purchased them willingly, after comparing them to the alternatives. The sheer number of ignorant comments on these stories is absolutely astounding to me, as it's clear most commenters have never even used the products or services they are deriding..

      So yes, I consider myself a Microsoft fan in that I've found Microsoft products consistently meet my needs and are of high quality compared to the alternatives I've tried. I consider a fanboy to be someone who has blind affiliation for a company, and in that regard I do not consider myself one, as I've had extensive experience with other products; I use Linux and Android daily in my work (robotics), so I know what the alternatives offer. However, despite this, and despite informing commenters on this site as such, I'm still constantly branded a shill, fanboy, or any number of labels and ad hominem attacks to try and discredit my opinion. I honestly try my best to make my comments informative. correct misconceptions, and reply thoughtfully and thoroughly to those who engage me in a debate on the merits, but that sort of behavior doesn't seem to be tolerated by the majority here as long as it relates to Microsoft.

    40. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2nd rate code lacks error trapping crutchy. What are error traps for?

    41. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by q.kontinuum · · Score: 2

      Hmm. Maybe it's time for me to get at least an Android in emulator to compare it a bit better.

      --
      Trolling is a art!
    42. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by DMiax · · Score: 2

      Finally, a sound marketing strategy for WP8!

    43. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by uqbar · · Score: 1

      I generally don't bother to post about my experiences with MS products. The zealots of other platforms don't want to hear anything that doesn't jive with their world view and will brand you a shill for making simple factual statements. The whole idea of arguing about this stuff is silly, especially since most of the people arguing don't have extensive experience in all the major platforms from which to form a real opinion.

    44. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering most of the supporters of Microsoft (dare I say "fanboys") have REALLY high UID's or are anonymous cowards.... yes, it is hard to believe, and it is hard to understand why after all the years of abuse from the Linux/Apple crowd the Microsoft fans would continue to come in and spend most of their time defending their fanboyness to people who wouldn't use windows if it came with a blowjob from Selma Hayek.

      I wonder if any females are reading this, and it's SALMA Hayek.

      Neckbeard.

    45. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I liked Win95 (even the A version), WinME worked for me, and w2k was what I still consider the best GUI/OS. It was WindowsXP that sent me to Linux full time (before that I would keep a partition and boot it up every once in a while to play around with it)...now, my kids have netbooks with ubuntu, wife uses ubuntu on a 14" laptop, and I have 2 computers and 2 laptops running various distributions (slackware, ubuntu, debian, centos).

      The kids all use Windows at school and complain to me about it being a pain to use, I'm guessing it it because of all the extra crap and protection the schools need to implement, but I've never had a single one ask me for a similar setup (and I can easily give it to them since all the Netbooks came with Windows Licenses anyways).

      But truthfully, they use consoles and tablets/phone for games, so the computer is really just there for them to do homework (openoffice and a $19 HP desktop printer does just perfect) and play on the web (search, watch videos, play online games, etc), although the oldest has started to learn python now too :)

    46. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      oooh... you can spell. :) Everyone knew who I was talking about. After all I wrote, you bitch about that? Ok... here's an easier one. Substitute SALMA Hayek with Scarlett Johansson. There I spelled that right. Here's another... If I were a female, I'd have made a female-appropriate incentive....

      Such as: defending their fanboyness to people who wouldn't use windows if it came with a full body massage from Johnny Depp.
      Or if it came with a free shoes for life from (insert awesome designer name here)... Sexist? Not really... there are a shit-ton of commercials that celebrate a woman's love for shoes. Hell, wasn't that show with horseface glad about new shoes and handbags? I forget the name... they made two movies... crap. I'll think of it after I hit submit.... bah!

      Lighten up...

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    47. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      But compared to most any other site, this one has a disproportionately high number of article trolling or flaming Microsoft products.

      This site has been anti-Microsoft for as long as I can remember. The icon for Microsoft stories was a Bill Gates Borg for such a long time. If you're looking for unbiased commentary... I'm not sure where to go... people accuse Arstechnica of being pro-Apple. And osnews has always been unapologetic about its support for BeOS, and its hatred for Apple and much of the rest of the OS world.. (though with the new fellow running things, it has become a pro Microsoft site.)

      What I tried to convey in my original point was that you see people deriding Linux and Apple (and Android) for no other reason than they're not Microsoft. Then you see their UID and notice they've not been on Slashdot very long at all. There are exceptions to the rule, of course. But for the most part, when someone posts something about Microsoft being anti-competitive, OSS hostile, etc. people seem to come out of the woodwork to "debunk" that opinion, bolstered with nothing more than a love for all things Microsoft. I have a Windows XP machine I use for old games. I used to use Windows 98 as my primary OS (ever so briefly)... And I used OS X until it became iOS for Macs. I still come back to Linux. I haven't been "faithfully" using Linux since 1993, but I have been using it. My opinions about Microsoft are well known, and I've amended my earlier defense of Apple (they're no longer Unix with a cool UI)... but I never can find anything good to amend my opinions about Microsoft. They rub me the wrong way (Steve Ballmer in particular...) I do not hide my bias. I do not pretend to like Microsoft then criticize its products. That's rather like Slashdot. There is no pretense of Microsoft acceptance here. There are Microsoft supporters here, but the site has never been about being anything but critical of Microsoft.

      Using the term "trolling" or "flaming" Microsoft products can be said for many pro Microsoft sites when they "flame" or spread misinformation about Linux. I can link you to 100's of articles that are not press-releases from Microsoft, but they're so biased it's almost as if they're reprints from Redmond itself. They spread misinformation about the GPL and OSS in ways that infuriate those of us who use Linux... The fact that Microsoft has actively supported the legal challenges by notorious patent trolls and anti Microsoft companies (remember the infringement lawsuits brought by a certain failed commercial Unix company against IBM and "all Linux users"? Microsoft bankrolled their legal defense in a not-so-subtle way.)

      All corporations are capable of evil given enough time. Those who aren't quite evil enough, or haven't done their superbly evil act get praise on Slashdot, much to the chagrin of the "well they're corporations too!" crowd (usually the same as Microsoft supporters, but not always). That's not a hidden "feature" of Slashdot. It's well known.

      Defend your choices when you see obvious trolling. Just don't expect the site to rally around your Microsoft flag.. It's a personal choice to support Microsoft. I can't speak for anyone else, but as for Doctor Jest, I hate Microsoft (and Disney, the RIAA, the MPAA, Time Warner, BMG, Sony... you name it... I hate them at one time or another.) They can be redeemed in my eyes... but for the most part, corporations like those I listed (and shills for the corporations like the *AAs) continue to do the same things over and over and try to fuck the little guy at every opportunity. When (if) they change... I'll stop hating them... well, all of them except Disney and Microsoft. I just plain hate them. :)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    48. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      You have to notice a pattern though. Those who start "fresh" and immediately start defending Windows (even against jokes or other geek humor regarding Ballmer's chair-throwing, etc.) and do nothing but post pro-windows information and curiously don't participate in any other conversation. I've seen this more than once... many times more than could be attributed to coincidence. There are exceptions, of course. I spent a crapload of time avoiding any controversial statements or what some would consider "trolling" until I'd developed a posting pattern that people could glean from me that I wasn't a troll... just an opinionated libertarian nerd. (It's easy to see if someone wanted to investigate if I was a shill or not.) I spend more time discussing technology and some politics than anything else on the site. (That's not to say I don't enjoy the science discussions or entertainment discussions about movies and the like...)

      Slashdot's been a pro-linux site from its inception... It has a built-in bias. And since the title is "News for Nerds"... since we recall for a long time anyone using Linux was a "nerd" or a "geek" because it was "harder" to use and it didn't have the lavish support Windows (or even Mac) had in terms of hardware and software. The title of the site is still appropriate, IMHO.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    49. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Face value isn't the point, but if you've been here so long, its pretty easy to figure out where you stand and if you contribute to the site more than someone who's had a UID for a week and spends that week posting nothing but Microsoft praise and jabs at the GPL. Until those UIDs have been around long enough to post something other than "Windows 8 is the best OS evar" they are going to be seen as a shill. It's just common sense. If that person becomes a pro Microsoft user of slashdot, it'll be when they branch out, discuss other things besides Redmond's finest, and shows everyone else something other than a Windows 8 tattoo.

      However, the pattern emerges that there are quite a few high UIDs that do nothing but promote windows and all things Microsoft (including their phones and everything they make except for "Bob"). I can change my mind about who I think are shills... it's not a permanent mark. I'm just posting what I've noticed about the rabidly pro Microsoft posters I've seen lately. I'm not the only one that thinks so, either.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    50. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Also the neckbeards wouldn't be caught dead supporting Microsoft.

      The younger generation (myself included) associates Windows with Xbox as much as they do PCs. So we're far more likely to like Microsoft products.

      As to my Lumia 920. Works great. No problem getting 24 hour battery life.

    51. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $hill faggot here, guys. Mod this $ M$ $hill down to troll-hell where he $hill deserves.

    52. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Considering most of the supporters of Linux/Apple (dare I say "fanboys") have REALLY high UID's

      Um, like my five digit UID? Fact is, son, I've never seen a windows fan with less than six digits, most have seven or eight. Most of the Linux fans have lower UIDs than me. I almost never see anyone post AC in favor of Linux, why would they?

      So to misquote George Smoot when he was talking to Sheldon, With all due respects, Doctor hairyfish, but are you on crack?

      Oh, right, you're using Windows...

    53. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by crutchy · · Score: 1

      hahaha APK is pissed... +1 funny

    54. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you see people deriding Linux and Apple (and Android) for no other reason than they're not Microsoft"

      check again dude, it's usually an anti Microsoft story and they are usually just defending MS from the torrential flood of hate (maybe by pointing out that the competing systems also have flaws).

    55. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by hairyfish · · Score: 1

      Feel free to explain how having a low UID counts for anything? I've been here since 98 - a new account doesn't always equate to a new user.

    56. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      A low UID doesn't matter at all. Context is everything. An earlier comment noted that the shills all have brand new accounts, you tried to turn it on its head and it just didn't work.

      Why did you get a new ID? You can get your old one back if you want it.

    57. Re:This is actually a Slashdot sting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An earlier comment noted that the shills all have brand new accounts, you tried to turn it on its head and it just didn't work.

      I find it hilarious that you actually think there are 'shills' on this site, how retarded are you? Seriously you actually do think that, what a moron, and to take it further you can't even refute what they are saying, instead these posts get you all riled up and you go on these rants about how the 'shills' are posting. It's funny that you would prefer to believe that microsoft is paying people to post on here than to admit what you (unless you're a complete fool) actually know, which is that some people do indeed like some microsoft products and that some people are trolling you so hard and you can't help but get sucked in.

  9. Re:I had a Windows phone... once. by William+Robinson · · Score: 3, Funny

    All you needed was this keyboard

  10. vs the Droid by ohnocitizen · · Score: 0

    Oooh this is turning into one of those delightful anecdotal evidence threads! My Android phone is usually quite stable. Every so often "contacts" crashes, bringing down the ability to dial numbers. Basically my phone forgets its a phone, but remembers to be a portable computer. When I had an iphone for work, it was rock solid stable.

    I wonder how stable the various phones are on the whole? A proper study would be fascinating.

    1. Re:vs the Droid by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, my iPad had 49 Calendar items for every single Contact's birthday until I deleted every all accounts from Settings/Mail, Contacts, Calendars and started again late last week, so even the Great Apple(tm) isn't immune to issues.

    2. Re:vs the Droid by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

      Oh agreed, just for my usage (phone functions, maps, and messaging) my iphone 3GS worked fine. If I had the iphone 5 maps would be buggy right out the gate (alongside data usage apparently). There's a reason my current phone is a droid and not an iphone (a few actually). The only other bother is despite being a droid, since it only has MTP linux compatibility for syncing is pretty pathetic.

    3. Re:vs the Droid by dbIII · · Score: 1

      N900 - solid (and heavy as) a rock.
      Pity Nokia went into self destruct afterwards.

    4. Re:vs the Droid by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      That's a feature to make sure you don't forget them.

    5. Re:vs the Droid by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      N900 - solid (and heavy as) a rock.

      God It really was heavy. I think it was as much the keyboard as anything else. What surprised me with the flagshit windows phones, is unlike the n900 which felt a million dollars. It included a radio, a remote control, hell I could play my tunes through the radio [It was like living in the future], hell I had 48gb in mine then, and was a computer not an electronics device, but it suffered from a shitty screen [needed a note solution], and not enough memory. It was weird updating it to a new phone that was in many ways inferior, but Nokia through its users under the bus for Meego, ironically in the context of this article Nokia windows users got thrown under the bus for Windows 8.

  11. windows phone sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's that metrosexual interface going down on itself all the time!

  12. If all you need are anectodes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gee, I've had two friends in the last week also report their iphone 5s locking up and freezing. Guess this is âoenewsâ as well. And oh, here's an Apple forum with ooo a whole 25 replies on it about the iphone 5 freezing.

    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4396519?start=0&tstart=0

    So how bout some real comparisons here instead of cherrypicking? How bout a satisfaction survey of 920 owners? Maybe some real journalistic work perhaps? How bout numerically compare the satisfaction of 920 owners to the rest of the field? Too defensible? Too much work?

    http://www.amazon.com/Nokia-Lumia-920-Windows-Phone/product-reviews/B00A2V7FCS/ref=sr_1_2_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

    Btw, one SKU of the Lumia is currently #3 across all carriers on Amazon and moving up every day despite limited production. Whereâ(TM)s the story on that?

    http://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Cell-Phones-Accessories-Service-Plans/zgbs/wireless/2407747011/ref=zg_bs_nav_cps_1_cps

    1. Re:If all you need are anectodes by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 4, Funny

      Calm down, Ballmer. You're getting worked up for no good reason. You know what the doctors said. Any more excitement and you can't throw chairs anymore. You don't want that, now do you?

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    2. Re:If all you need are anectodes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.amazon.com/Nokia-Lumia-920-Windows-Phone/product-reviews/B00A2V7FCS/ref=sr_1_2_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

      ZOMG!!! 13 reviews. That really puts things in perspective.

    3. Re:If all you need are anectodes by Paradigma11 · · Score: 2
    4. Re:If all you need are anectodes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Heh, somebody really likes his Lumia.

      I like it how his 710 reviews are copy-pasted, but 920 are different for different SKUs.

      Or this guy, who "upgraded from 810 to 920", but it didn't stop him from reviewing two models of 900 too.

      All those reviewers who registered just to leave a single 500 word buzzword filled review also aren't suspicious at all.

      Amazon reviews are as helpful as ever.

    5. Re:If all you need are anectodes by mrclisdue · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...and, the one-star comment from your link:

      By stop hiring guns to artificially boost up your phone ratings at Amazon. Lumia 900 was a show case of robot reviews. When I am writing this, Lumia 920 has already received five reviews, all of them 5-star. All but one has written a review of another product other than Lumia 920.

      DBLA (1 review in total) http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A1S7GEDIIDVLKG/ref=cm_cr_dp_pdp
      jthom (2 reviews) http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A2A941MKMDREPG/ref=cm_cr_dp_pdp
      Sup Karma (1 review) http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A4SUJVO0D8DM9/ref=cm_cr_dp_pdp
      Ramiro Watson (4 reviews, ALL on different colors of Lumia 920 with different titles) http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A1GU6PSZG155ND/ref=cm_cr_pr_pdp
      joseasilvestre (1 review) http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A3RR13YM1XGXNU/ref=cm_cr_pr_pdp

      ...the nokia/ms adulation in those reviews makes the apple/droid camps here appear subdued.

      cheers,

    6. Re:If all you need are anectodes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calm down there, ghost of Jobs. You are getting worked up for no good reason. You know that the iphone will always be considered a good phone by the Apple cultists, even if it kills puppies with each use. You know that black shirts will not sell phones anymore and if you get excited, the map app will display NY in France again. You don't want that now, do you?

    7. Re:If all you need are anectodes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This HAS to be anecdotal. They haven't sold enough Windows 8 phones to generate a statistically significant sample yet.

    8. Re:If all you need are anectodes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how bout some real comparisons here instead of cherrypicking?

      Well, I've had an Android Bionic since the beginning of December 2011 (it is on for 8 to 12 hours almost every day) and it has frozen/locked-up a total of three times, I got one to re-boot and the other two required a battery pull. Overall I'm quite happy with it.

    9. Re:If all you need are anectodes by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Considering theres about 500 iPhones for every 1 windows phone, i wouldn' take 25 replies too seriously.

    10. Re:If all you need are anectodes by SuseLover · · Score: 1

      I've had iphones since the 3G was released and have never had a lockup or reboot. Anecdotal evidence I know, But it at least proves it's not the platform's fault but likely bad apps that cause the problems.

    11. Re:If all you need are anectodes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Btw, one SKU of the Lumia is currently #3 across all carriers on Amazon and moving up every day despite limited production. Whereâ(TM)s the story on that?

      They don't sell iPhones
      It's practically a fire sale at 69.99
      It's was just release which usually mean a small bump from early adopters.

      Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics.

    12. Re:If all you need are anectodes by eco_oce · · Score: 1

      I have an iPhone 4. Up until upgrading to iOS 6.0 I had to restart it every time I wanted to use it to set up a personal hotspot. I could get one connection out of it - but if I turned off the hotspot feature and then it would need rebooting before it turning on the hotspot feature would work again. Using airplane mode didn't reset the problem - it was a full turn it off and then wait a couple of minutes for the phone to boot fix. All of this mysteriously disappeared when I upgraded to iOS 6.0. Now I'm fine (unless I need a map).

      All devices have problems - they are all made for a price.

    13. Re:If all you need are anectodes by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, so the original post citing windows errors really shouldn't be disregarded based on anecdotal evidence. I went from a Galaxy Nexus to an iPhone 5 and they both have their issues, albeit far more on the Galaxy Nexus. But to be fair, that's a generation old hardware, so I'd expect the iPhone 5 to perform better.

    14. Re:If all you need are anectodes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You two iPhone using friends are from several million iPhone users. You are forgetting that the two WP8 users reporting problems are the only two WP8 users in the world. :-)

  13. Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by phanboy_iv · · Score: 1, Informative

    ..and it lasts longer on a charge than my Galaxy Nexus ever did. I've had one reboot. I used to get freezes and reboots on occasion with the Gnex too. Overall it's been fine. More responsive and reliable than the last 2 Androids I've had.

    1. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ..and it lasts longer on a charge than my Galaxy Nexus ever did.

      I've had one reboot. I used to get freezes and reboots on occasion with the Gnex too.

      Overall it's been fine. More responsive and reliable than the last 2 Androids I've had.

      Quick, mod parent down! The poster is reporting on direct experience. Let's not allow this to clutter up our thread of digs and pokes at Microsoft! Because those never, ever get old!

    2. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's good that you're getting better battery life (the "one reboot" is a bit of a stretch), and "several weeks" seems funny since AT&T just started selling them on Nov. 11th. But glad you like your purchase. If you just come here to shill for Ballmer... well that's another story, isn't it? :)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    3. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Infidel! Burn him!!!!!

    4. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by phanboy_iv · · Score: 1

      I was at BUILD, I got one a week or so early. But nice try. ;)

    5. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      As if your bias wasn't already apparent now your admitting to being a Microsoft shill. God you shills are stupid.

    6. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You hardly need to be a shill to be at build. Many of us code against whatever pays the bills, myself included.

    7. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does that mean you consider everyone who was at Google I/O to be a Google shill?

    8. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by crutchy · · Score: 0

      definitely... maybe if the op had actually turned his lumia phone on he would have got a better battery life comparison with his androids

    9. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent is an idiot.
      I'd rather have a phone that's sluggish, than one losing calls when it freezes.

    10. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But glad you like your purchase. If you just come here to shill for Ballmer... well that's another story, isn't it? :)

      Boy, you really sound like Karl Rove now... Quickly, you must get the truth out! Start a new web site to preach your gospel, call it "unskewedwindows8phonepolls.com" !

    11. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by nstlgc · · Score: 1

      So visiting a Microsoft conference now automatically makes you a shill? I can see why you would post this as AC.

      --
      I'm Rocco. I'm the +5 Funny man.
    12. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and your bias because you would never be invited

    13. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Another AC speaking)

      Presumably not automatic, however, it makes it inherently likely that you are if not a huge fanboy, at least someone with a large commitment and vested interest in the success of the system. People like that also usually come with gigantic, heavily tinted glasses and blinders the size of barn-doors.

    14. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's the "nice try" comment that phanboy_iv couldn't resist posting that outed him. I can see how difficult it may be to read until the end.

    15. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So visiting a Microsoft conference now automatically makes you a shill? I can see why you would post this as AC.

      Oh, I've seen users with years of pro-Linux posting history be called a Microsoft shill here for daring to contradict the "M$ SUX!" ranting. It's the new Godwin's law.

    16. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course visiting an Android conference only makes you cool. Welcome to /.

    17. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Is that really surprising? The Galaxy Nexus is over a year old at this point. If someone were to release a smartphone a year later and it's slower, less reliable and has worse battery life than the previous generation of devices, it would be absolutely absurd. Even the Galaxy SIII released way back in May would be a more fair comparison.

    18. Re:Had a Lumia 920 for several weeks now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are errortraps in code for, crutchy?

  14. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You aren't hearing from any, BECAUSE there are none

  15. Android is worse by DeathFromSomewhere · · Score: 2

    I had a Motorola Milestone (international version of the original Droid) for a while, now running a Lumia 800. The Milestone would die at least once a day, and the battery would last maybe 10 hours if I left it completely alone. Even though the Milestone was a flagship Android phone at one point, I could write a giant TL;DR post about the problems I had with that phone.

    My Lumia gets over 30 hours of battery on a single charge and has yet to crash or even do anything unexpected in the 6 months I've owned it. The difference in the quality of the phones is so night and day I can't imagine that a WP8 phone would be any worse than an Android.

    --
    -1 overrated isn't the same thing as "I disagree".
    1. Re:Android is worse by _merlin · · Score: 1

      You're comparing Motorola to Nokia. That's always going to come out favouring Nokia, as they've always been better at building phones. A Nokia Android phone would make a Motorola Windows phone look bad, too (if such things existed). Flagship means nothing - it was just the most expensive phone made by Motorola for a while. Motorola can easily make a shit phone expensive.

    2. Re:Android is worse by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

      That's always going to come out favouring Nokia, as they've always been better at building phones

      The days of Nokia having a meme associated with their quality of build are gone with their factories to china in part of Elops [continuing] cost cutting exercise.

    3. Re:Android is worse by _merlin · · Score: 1

      The days of Nokia having a meme associated with their quality of build are gone with their factories to china in part of Elops [continuing] cost cutting exercise.

      Oh I'm under no illusion that the legendary Nokia quality of the '90s and early '00s will ever be back, but they've always been. I just said they're better than Motorola. I know that's not saying much, considering how bad Motorola phones have been at least as far back as the v2088.

    4. Re:Android is worse by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      I know that's not saying much, considering how bad Motorola phones have been at least as far back as the v2088.

      I'd be very surprised if it what you are saying is true. The only phone I have ever seen break is my original iPhone which snapped at the dock. Even the cheapest phones are pretty study today [I think even the cheap materials have got better], and generally suffer either "design problems" like iPhones antenna/camera problems or OS problems like Windows has here, Android on the whole has seemed pretty immune, even Apple seem to clear their release problems up pretty quickly although its hard to tell they are a pretty tolerant bunch.

    5. Re:Android is worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're all made in China now. They're all low grade. I'm sometimes have reboot on My Samsung Galaxy R style. I think it's the power button. When it's encrypted, it's fine, or if it has a swipe password. But I just have swipe to unlock now and after that, the power button just has to be held down for a couple of seconds in your pocket which can happen easily, then it will power off. But frankly, I think it's best to root your phone and encrypt it. I wouldn't trust any of them

    6. Re:Android is worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mhh my Galaxy Nexus gehts around 48 hours if I let it rest alone with an occasional on doing something.
      So I would not say that Android is generally worse.

    7. Re:Android is worse by X.25 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I had a Motorola Milestone (international version of the original Droid) for a while, now running a Lumia 800. The Milestone would die at least once a day, and the battery would last maybe 10 hours if I left it completely alone. Even though the Milestone was a flagship Android phone at one point, I could write a giant TL;DR post about the problems I had with that phone.

      My Lumia gets over 30 hours of battery on a single charge and has yet to crash or even do anything unexpected in the 6 months I've owned it. The difference in the quality of the phones is so night and day I can't imagine that a WP8 phone would be any worse than an Android.

      So, you are comparing an old smartphone with the latest one, and you don't see a problem in that?

      Amusing.

      Would you like to compare the reliability of your phone with my Nokia 3210?

    8. Re:Android is worse by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      The days of Nokia having a meme associated with their quality of build are gone with their factories to china in part of Elops [continuing] cost cutting exercise.

      Wat? Give me the N9/Lumia build over the plastic penny-pinching crap of the old N series, every time.
      The cost cutting at Nokia did not touch as many really important things as bitter Symbian and Linux fanbois would like to believe.
      As they said at Wired, the brick is back.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    9. Re:Android is worse by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I have a Lumia 800 as one of my phones and I have a mixed opinion of it. The screen is excellent and touch is highly responsive. The phone itself feels solid in the hand.

      On the flip side there is a little hatch covering the USB which is incredibly annoying since smart phones need to be charged once a day so this hatch is just a nuisance. Fortunately / unfortunately for me, the hatch snapped off. But it's next to the SIM slot which is incredibly fiddly and easy to damage. You also can't remove the battery and there are no expansion slots. The worst sin by far is some Lumia 800s suffered from fault batteries which discharged in about 6 hours. It took about 4 months for Nokia to semi-fix the issue in firmware but if the battery came out, they could have just sent out replacements.

      From looking at the 920 I think it's a better phone all around, at least from a hardware standpoint. After the battery debacle I don't trust Nokia's quality control though and I think the hard launch deadline for WP8 is bound to have introduced bugs which might require a firmware update or two to fix. I also don't think much of WP7.5 and most descriptions of WP8 suggest the changes aren't that significant from a user perspective.

      So Nokia make nice phones, but I don't see any reason to favour them over other brands. Especially given which phone OS runs on it.

    10. Re:Android is worse by DeathFromSomewhere · · Score: 1

      I don't see a problem with it the comparison. Age is not an excuse for a lack of reliability. In fact an older device should be more reliable because it's had a chance to go through major updates and bug fixes. If I was complaining about poor performance then yeah it would be a bad comparison; but that's not what I'm complaining about.

      It looks like Google isn't getting any better at this stuff too.

      --
      -1 overrated isn't the same thing as "I disagree".
  16. Neither do I by hundredrabh · · Score: 1

    Why is this news? Was this not expected?

    Oh wait .. I missed "some" ..
    Good job guys!

    --
    --whacky
  17. Re:I had a Windows phone... once. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And a USB-to-serial adaptor.

  18. Re:My iPhone crashed 3 times today... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

    does that count?

    as much as you are an AC and we hardly trust you. I owned several iPhone (now i5) and never experienced a crash - not even once.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  19. freezing, rebooting and battery problems .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that a list of top built-in features of the Android OS?

    1. Re: freezing, rebooting and battery problems .... by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      Isn't that a list of top built-in features of the Android OS?

      No I would say the best features of Android, for me personally, is its incredibly first party Applications, maps; chrome being the ones I use most. I love the ability to customise my phone though the internet, both the play store, and my contacts. I love the widget layer, for both the live wallpapers and the widgets. I personally have a phone that includes joystick controls, so obviously a customisable OS by third party manufactures meant a lot to me ;).

  20. Re:My iPhone crashed 3 times today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should install DragonVale on it and see how often it doesn't, err, crash.

  21. edge cases? by Aryeh+Goretsky · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hello,

    It would be interesting to know the scope of the problem(s), and how to exercise the(se) bug(s).

    I have had a Nokia Lumia 920 for just under a week now (replacing my year old Nokia Lumia 900) and have not noted any performance or battery-life related issues with it. Admittedly, I have not done that much with it yet, as I am still reloading applications onto it (an area which is keen for improvement), but I have to say it has worked consistently without problem.

    I wonder if the problems are due to a specific application or manufacturer-applied configuration.

    Regards,

    Aryeh Goretsky

    --
    Dexter is a good dog.
    1. Re:edge cases? by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      I've read reports where people have narrowed at least some battery churn to a buggy IMAP implementation when working with Google Mail. Maybe it's the GMail server doing something unexpected, but that's still a client bug.
      Others point at NFC. I haven't used WP8 yet to check.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    2. Re:edge cases? by Inda · · Score: 1

      Reloading applications?

      Don't you just sign into a Google account for that? :p

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  22. "Phones", in quotes by rueger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I stopped worrying about battery life when I finally made the mental leap from "it's a phone with lots of features" to "it's cool little computer that also makes phone calls."

    Considering all that I use it for, sixteen to twenty hours on a charge is pretty damned good for a computer that fits in my pocket.

    FWIW - Nexus S Android GB, ICS, JB: No really crashes or serious problems. CM9 on the same phone - lots of wierdness.

    1. Re:"Phones", in quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found that Swype kills my Nexus S (ICS or JB), requiring I reboot the thing to restore performance. Not enough RAM maybe? Aside from that it's usually okay, but occasionally I find the performance suddenly degrades and doesn't come back until I reboot; and the stock browser, Chrome, and Google Reader all sometimes crash.

      CM9 ("stable" or nightlies) has way more issues though. Everything crashes all the time, and I had it reboot several times during calls. Ridiculous.

    2. Re:"Phones", in quotes by ameen.ross · · Score: 1

      I experienced the same on the Galaxy S1 with CM9, though the stable release went a long way to fix stability issues. Also, now on CM10, no stability issues whatsoever and barely any issues at all. I'm on a Milestone release, and didn't even bother to upgrade to 10.0.0 yet.

      --
      $(echo cm0gLXJmIC8= | base64 --decode)
    3. Re:"Phones", in quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      N900 was a cool little computer - Android not so much and WP is limited like feature phone. I almost cried when I had to switch from N900 to Galaxy S2 :(

  23. Sounds just like Win mobile 6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an Omnia i910 on the Bell network here in Canada..It has all the problems mentioned in this article. I have to reboot it all the time, it changes its battery usage and after reloading the os to original settings it will start to use the battery correctly again. Bluetooth causes it to crash if a call is dropped, all sorts of stupid software problems.

    WTF are the coders in Redmond doing, sounds like they just recycle shit code and then patch it for the new releases. The second release of Win mobile to >6.1 fixed these problems...but Bell does not offer the patched OS! The assholes (%#*&%

    I am almost willing to bet the same shit will happen with the first releases of Win Phone8 ...Bell and others will just sit there on their collective asses and wait for the contract to expire and then offer to recycle your old Nokia or HTC windows 8 piece of shit phone ..which is what they are doing with all their contract phones that they do not push software updates for!

    Perhaps software glitches on Smart Phones are seen as little more than an opportunity to screw over customers buy making sure that they want to get rid of them at end of contract.

    My prediction is that cell phones which are now 500 dollars plus will essentially be worthless like a 2 year old Windows laptop and that this bullshit is intentional collusion to obsolete devices by the manufactures with the acquiescence of the providers and software companies.

    We live in a throw away society but this is starting to be ridiculous and will eventually bight us all in the ass because of our greed and stupidity!

     

    1. Re:Sounds just like Win mobile 6! by jimbo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sigh.

      The guts of a phone is ridicously complex. I worked for Symbian for ten years and we threw incredible amounts of resources and effort into testing and we still didn't catch all bugs.

      Nobody wants to release a device with aggravating bugs. Be it Apple, Nokia or Samsung, they all really do want the best customer experience. Only an idiot would think otherwise. However, they have to release at some point, otherwise the market window is gone on a model they've typically worked on for a year.

      There is no conspiracy to screw over customers by giving them crap.

    2. Re:Sounds just like Win mobile 6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sigh.

      The guts of a phone is ridicously complex. I worked for Symbian for ten years and we threw incredible amounts of resources and effort into testing and we still didn't catch all bugs.

      Nobody wants to release a device with aggravating bugs. Be it Apple, Nokia or Samsung, they all really do want the best customer experience. Only an idiot would think otherwise. However, they have to release at some point, otherwise the market window is gone on a model they've typically worked on for a year.

      There is no conspiracy to screw over customers by giving them crap.

      I am not saying the manufactures are at fault, they do try to release a good product. Problem comes with providers like Bell that rely on contracts to subsidise phone sales for the manufactures. Sure Microsoft updated Windows Mobile to a reasonable state after launching a usable but flawed os. And they certainly released a better mobile os with 7 that updated to a very usable state quickly. Trouble is again companies like bell lock down the roms and refuse to push the necessary updates.

      The few windows 7 phones that the jerks did contract out are all locked down and the last update that fixed several bluetooth issues and radio issues with certain chipsets is not going to be released on BELL! So they are at it again. Even the guys that sell the phones in the kiosks are apologising for the problems that Bell causes.

      I have heard of similar issues with other providers here in Canada ...particularly Virgin Mobile and Rogers to be precise. SO I am walking with my feet and wallet this time and that includes everyone else that I am related to...my brother in law's son had huge ld and data charge issues with a so called smart phone that made data calls out of his pocket on Bell because of a software glitch that caused the phone to go online without notifying the user! Others that I have talked to have similar issues with software updates, fees and charges, and strange usage charges caused by software glitches. (especially on iPhones!)

      In fact there is a whole new snake oil industry starting to spring up with companies unlocking phones for people who reach the end of contract here in Canada and in Great Britain. Locked phones are the problem and do not do justice to the people who write the code, or the manufactures.

      My original contract phone with Bell was a Symbian oddly enough and again they did not push the Symbian update fixes for the contract LG Xenon that I originally signed up with. Again it is the provider software modifications and lockdown that was the problem with that cell phone. My next phone will be a simple Nokia Symbian flip phone on no contract that can do text and bluetooth and nothing else! Fortunately these are dirt cheap and still out there to be had...the other choice would be an off contract Blackberry with the same features. But paying 5-700 or even more for an iPhone 5 just for a non contract so called SMART PHONE that only eats holes in my wallet, is just plain stupid and not really all that useful.

      Symbian was and is a great phone OS, I really like it. In fact from what I have seen Win8 obviously benefited by cloning some of the great parts of Symbian.

      If I ever get a new phone I will make damn sure that the rom is not provider locked and until I find a provider that addresses updates adequately all I will buy is throw away cheapo junk phones...my SMART PHONE days are over until these clowns change their act.

      Fortunately in Canada I can now force the provider to give up my number so I can continue to use it on any carrier I chose.
      ONE step in the right direction for the industry at least. Hopefully regulators will step in and force the jerks at bell, rogers and the like to allow the unlocking of off contract phones as part of the original contract. This way the consumer can easily sell it or switch providers. It is the same problem as buying a computer and not having the ability to install any OS or OS update that I choose.
      In short if Windows Phone 8 is again used as a lure to peddle product that will not update on contract and if it also costs more than a decent laptop or tablet off contract, then for anyone with a brain it is a total waste of money and time.

    3. Re:Sounds just like Win mobile 6! by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has a long, long history of releasing software that would be considered Beta by most other companies. It wouldn't surprise me in the least to see this attitude continued with it's phones.

  24. Huh? by thestudio_bob · · Score: 2

    Every phone and every OS has its problems, and happy users probably aren't as vocal

    Fuck that! Take your beatings like iPhone and Android. Jeezo, Microsoft (and your shills) you're a frick'n baby.

    --
    The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They used that line with computers too "Every computer and OS has its problems, and happy users probably aren't as vocal." And it was a bullshit lie then too. Linux *is* more fucking stable. It *does* perform much better. The shills yelp and yelp like little kids till they start believing their own crap. There's a reason Linux is used by 93.8% of the 500 fastest supercomputers, and has 96.1% of the performance share: it works. Its like: we can get 500,000 8 core processors running at super high efficiency, and so can also get a 2 core arm processor make a tablet perform really well. And unlike other systems, there is 1 linux kernel, and it runs a galaxy S3 as well as the DOE/SC/Oak Ridge National Laboratory Titan - Cray XK7 , Opteron 6274 16C 2.200GHz, Cray Gemini interconnect, NVIDIA K20x (currently #1 on the list with 560640 cores). Don't believe me? Well then look over here ya putz!

    2. Re:Huh? by DMiax · · Score: 1

      Every phone and every OS has its problems, and happy users probably aren't as vocal

      Fuck that! Take your beatings like iPhone and Android. Jeezo, Microsoft (and your shills) you're a frick'n baby.

      He did: the primary response to criticism from those two camps is always "but the others are bad too". So I really fail to see the difference :)

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its like: we can get 500,000 8 core processors running at super high efficiency, and so can also get a 2 core arm processor make a tablet perform really well.

      But getting wifi, sound and hardware accelerated graphics to work eludes you, it's still a usability nightmare which is why it only dominates the low-end of the consumer space and places in which people don't have to interact with it.

  25. Re:hopefully it isn't as bad as android by crutchy · · Score: 1

    try an iphone... you will feel better about your ice cream sandwich :)

  26. typo: "above" should be "themselves" by dbIII · · Score: 1

    typo: "above" should be "themselves"

  27. Re:hopefully it isn't as bad as android by pbjones · · Score: 1

    can't use ice-cream sandwich, it makes my teeth hurt.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  28. Well, at least by 21mhz · · Score: 1

    they left us with a December.

    It sounds as if you can't expect much robustness from smartphones these days, can you?

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    1. Re:Well, at least by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Wow! That one has escaped me all this time. I have confirmed the bug is there, big as day. I can safely say I have never had something quite like that on my android devices until this one.

      That said? It's a Google Nexus 7. It *will* get fixed and updated and soon. Carrier supported phones and tablets? Not so much.

    2. Re:Well, at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this had happened on iOS the internet and media would be alight with "ChristmasGate" stories. Fortunately it's just some Android piece of shit so no-one gives a fuck.

  29. my wife's Lumia 920 has been returned by pointyhat · · Score: 3, Informative

    Thanks to the joy of distance selling regulations, my wife has had her Lumia 920 returned. It, after a day, decided to freeze approximately 30 minutes after every power cycle. Not only that, the wireless charging doesn't work properly and the operating system is slightly clunky in places (moreso than windows phone 7.5 which tbh wasn't all that bad). It would be a good device if it wasn't for these issues. Oh and the music app is basically a large advertising platform. I've just dumped my Lumia 710 for a Nexus 4, which so far seems reasonable but not anything overly special. She has gone back to her Galaxy ace.

    1. Re:my wife's Lumia 920 has been returned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you try getting her another lumia 920? I have the 920 and my phone rebooted only once and that was because of a windows phone 7 app

    2. Re:my wife's Lumia 920 has been returned by pointyhat · · Score: 1

      It had no apps installed at all and it was a hard freeze on the startup screen, then a watchdog forced reboot.

  30. Ha crapows phone 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Glad I didn'tget sucked into buying the hTC 8X as I ws thinking of - great device - crap OS no doubt..

    "As reported on The Verge, many people are experiencing freezing, rebooting and battery problems on their new Windows Phone 8 devices. This WP8Central thread shows many of the issues. Affected devices include Lumia 920 and HTC 8X."

    Windows rebooting to avoid pink screen of death or whatever crappy screen they have now. I feel most sorry for Nokia Lumia 920 users - they're not the smartest for buying a 185gram tank of a phone, >10 mm thick, with jagged edges, and now a crap OS - not too smart, uncomfortable, and inconvenienced - a horrid combination

  31. Windows was feature complete at XP by symbolset · · Score: 0

    Everything since is bug fixes that ought to be free, and moving the buttons to get you to buy it again.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Windows was feature complete at XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything since is bug fixes that ought to be free, and moving the buttons to get you to buy it again.

      But then the APIs kind of sucked compared to what they are now, and the security was dreadful.

    2. Re:Windows was feature complete at XP by symbolset · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You and I understand the subtle nuances of your post, the tradeoffs between this potential use and that other use, the tug and pull between the developer and the environment provider. You Microsoft ACs have grown quite good at sparring with me. But the end user doesn't have a micro givashit. He just wants to enjoy being empowered by the device to do stuff he couldn't do yesterday. And the stuff he cares about is first: to connect to his loved ones and his lesser loved ones. Second: to share his life with the aforementioned loved ones and any who might be interested. He could give a fuck less about APIs.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    3. Re:Windows was feature complete at XP by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      Developers care about APIs. Developers create apps. Users care about apps.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    4. Re:Windows was feature complete at XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be a fucking moron.

    5. Re:Windows was feature complete at XP by abirdman · · Score: 1

      Developers care about APIs. Developers create apps. Users care about apps.

      you left out
      "... Profit!"

      --
      Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
    6. Re:Windows was feature complete at XP by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Developers care about the potential market for their apps. With a half-billion installed base each, iOS and Android are serious contenders. If you look at the curves of adoption and the lead time for development, the choice is clear.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  32. Re:kjhkjhkjhkhj by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

    hhgfhghgfhgf

    Try rebooting to see if you get your keyboard back. Then tell us which smartphone you're using.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. I am an outlier I guess by erroneus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The only time I have had "issues" with my android devices is when I had the Amazon App store loaded on my phone(s). I am pretty selective about the software I install on my phones/tablets as I know what role apps can play in the stability of the environment. All was great at the beginning but a few updates down the road and the next thing I knew problems were happening. Apps force-closing and reboots. I went about removing different things then putting them back when no difference occurred. Finally, I got to the innocent Amazon App store and things got notably better... and worse.

    Turns out, that when I removed the Amazon App store, none of my apps would work! At least not the apps which I had acquired through them. Then I was like "ah ha!" Amazon was doing something not just to my phone, but also to the apps on my phone. Factory reset and reinstall of my apps (not through Amazon) and things were better after that. My wife's got that phone now. Stable as stable can be... also, it runs a Team Whiskey ROM on it. (Did I mention I don't like to run stock carrier ROMs? It's not like you can trust them.)

    My current phone is better still but I'm waiting for the next round of Nexus 4 phones. Funny. So many people couldn't get their phone and at the same time, eBay is flooded with that phone priced around $600 or more. Oh how I'd love to visit those jerks. These are the same people go go around flipping houses. I recall in the early days of the housing bubble burst. I was in Texas where the housing economy was largely not affected and the news was starving for some local tragedy stories. They finally found one... this guy was almost in tears... he was a house flipper and could flip his houses and was stuck with them. Dumbass. I hope he burns in hell.

  35. Galaxy S2, 4.2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no freezes, no reboots, no lockups.

    same with my vibrant running 2.3, when i updated it to 4.1 i had some issues but they were related to a badly baked rom, not the phone or OS. =)

    all in all, no issues with any of my android devices that weren't bad rom related.

  36. Re:Can't be worse than Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Razr maxx regularly skips while playing music. I have to wait 20 seconds for the home screen to load after I quit an app. And last week, the phone locked up on the "incoming call" screen. I had to do a hard reboot.

    What the hell did you expect buying a Motorola smartphone ?

  37. Re:Ha kapow phone 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some people arn't such a weak little girl that can't lift 185 grams, also lets see your phone do this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDEahsoa_N4&noredirect=1 .

  38. Being something of a compulsive phone-swapper... by silly_sysiphus · · Score: 2

    I've had nothing but good experiences with WP7.5 software, which leads me to believe that WP8 could be worth considering. That said, I'm waiting until/if RIM manages to get their BBX hardware out before using my next contract upgrade, as I'd strongly prefer a phone with a hardware QWERTY board. On two different WP devices (HTC Surround and Samsung Focus), the software performed faultlessly. That said, one of the primary concerns for many users (apps) is a non-starter for me, since the only apps I require are an RPN calculator and Facebook (a necessary evil). [All I really want is good call quality, decent battery life, email, calendaring, and a bit of light web browsing/photography). Frankly, WP7.5 was near, if not at the top of, my mobile OS experiences, which include: WebOS (Palm Pixi Plus, HP Veer), iOS (iPhone 4 and original), Android (1.x and 2.x on HTC Hero, Motorola i1, Samsung Captivate), Symbian S60 (Nokia E66, E90, 6650), Symbian UIQ (SE P800, M600i), Blackberry OS 6 (9800), WM 6.0 (iMate Ultimate 8150, Toshiba G910), etc., along with the WP7.5 devices. My other favorite was WebOS, but it was really too buggy. So...erm...I spend far too much time on phones. And Windows Phone is really pretty good (this coming from a former Apple evangelist (they lost me after Snow Leopard)/Linux user who tolerates, rather than enjoys Windows.

  39. Windows phone 7 apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an iphone 4s and a lumia 920. I bet mosrt of the crashes and freezes are due to people using windows phone 7 apps on a windows phone 8 phone. MOST apps on the store are for the previous operating system. They make it difficult in the store to figure out if its native or not.

    I have only had one lockup and that was because of a windows phone 7 app.

  40. Re:I had a Windows phone... once. by ByOhTek · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've had a Windows Phone 7 phone, including the upgrade of the OS, it's required maybe that many restarts in the past 1.5 years - this is about the same over a given duration as my use of the iPhone4s while over seas, and as some of my friends with good Androids. A lot better than the two crap androids I've had.

    Note: I'd actually recommend most people get a good Android phone over a Windows phone, but if you are going to criticize the phone, criticize it on it's flaws, it's got enough of them, don't try to invent shit.

    You should mention *which* version of the phone you've had.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  41. dude it's Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what did you expect?

  42. Re:Can't be worse than Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol using open source crap on a phone, u got what u deserved bro

  43. Not a WP8 user but... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    I want to see it succeed. Why? Because it will help drive innovation for iOS and Android. Heck, I'm even pulling for Blackberry. From an end user standpoint, the more we have to choose from the better. So sure, WP8 might stumble a bit out of the gate but it will get better. Even WebOS with it's swipe-to-close-the-app feature had something to add...a feature that Android adopted.

    I've seen the WP8 phones but not had a chance to use one yet. Honestly, it didn't seem half bad. The app ecosystem is going to lag for a bit but I think that most of the essential apps are already there. Should be interesting.

  44. I often wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do /.ers like ANYTHING other than Linux?

  45. Re:I had a Windows phone... once. by mopower70 · · Score: 1

    but if you are going to criticize X, criticize it on it's flaws, it's got enough of them, don't try to invent shit.

    Yes, probably off-topic, but I've found myself saying exactly that in pretty much every conversation I've had regarding religion, politics, and economic policy for the last five years. It's sad to see it's now infected technology.

  46. Missing comma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows Phone, 8 Users Hit Some Snags

  47. The amount of retardation in this post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is staggering, on both sides of the fence. No wonder /.'s creators all split. Jesus.

  48. I am waiting for Meego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meego is coming back, no reasons to switch to iOS,wp8 or Android.

    Android: Good, but the lack of updates is annoying except for Nexus devices
    iOS: updated, stable, good looking, it only lacks of customization....
    Windows Phone 8: Buggy, based on windows, IE, everything to hate it. But the metro interface is nice.
    Tizen: Cool piece of software, lacks of hardware and software.
    WebOS: Powerfull, now opensource and works on a good and cheap tablet, it have a good futur!

  49. Goes both ways by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

    They are making their desktop OS more like a phone/tablet. And making their phone OS more like the desktop (cerca 1995, unfortunately).

    --
    -
  50. Re:hopefully it isn't as bad as android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What're error traps in code for, crutchy?

  51. Samsung stability by phorm · · Score: 1

    Outside of the Samsungs, they've all been exceptionally stable

    Not so sure about the transform, but about 6-8mo in my GS2 starting having major stability issues. I had originally assumed it was from an update a little earlier, but I noticed that it would start to bog down, then spontaneously reboot shortly after, with a noticeable drop in battery charge after the reboot. After I replaced the battery on the phone, the stability issues mostly went away, and it's been good to go since.

  52. Re:I had a Windows phone... once. by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

    Phones aren't about technology anymore. It's about fashion nowadays.

  53. New Win 8 phone....excellent by bricko · · Score: 1

    This new Win 8 phone is the most sophisticated machine Ive seen as for phones. Wonderful smoothness for the Nokis 920. No mess ups so far. Great customizing ability, all works etc. Just need to get new Zune or iTune type of media management and sync client. They are working on a "WinTUNE" type of iTune thingy.

  54. Re:I had a Windows phone... once. by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

    Most of those haven't really caused me any serious issues with my normal use, but, with what I have had the patience to read on your rather exhaustive list, I also cannot find fault in it either.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  55. Google Account by occasional_dabbler · · Score: 1

    There is an issue with syncing Google accounts WPCentral , which seems to be more an issue of Google changing their API rather than a bug as such with the phones.

    From my own experience with an HTC 8X I had to reset the phone and reinstall apps (no biggy) I set Gmail to forward to Hotmail and copied over all the contacts and since then it has run flawlessly. Battery life with light use is up to three days

    --
    "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs," I said. "we have a protractor"
  56. no issues with htc 8x here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My HTC 8x is much more reliable than google nexus s android phone. No crashes or restarts since purchased...

  57. Re:I had a Windows phone... once. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You realize almost all of those apply to Android and iOS as well (naturally the ones that don't have interchangeable ones that do). Remove all the ones that don't apply to Android and iOS as well and you'll have a pretty non-existent list.

  58. Re:I had a Windows phone... once. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow that list is seriously outdated. The top 5 are just plain wrong or irrelevant. I didn't bother reading after that. Quit trolling.

  59. 'CruTcHy': No errtraps != good code... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOUR "CODE" lacked error trapping here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42016197 (if you call using prebuilt functions coding, that is - more like a kid using legos, lol!)...

    ---

    Additionally - Didn't YOU say THIS also in regards to coding:

    "...cos we all try to write code that "looks cool" and you know, writing code that functions and easy to debug is all of secondary importance" - by crutchy (1949900) on Sunday November 18, @02:55AM (#42017605)

    FROM -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42017605

    "?"

    QUESTION - Where's YOUR code that functions AND is easy to debug?

    ---

    It isn't - LMAO:

    * You write code like a NOOB does, completely omitting error trapping... and the proof's right in that 1st link above!

    APK

    P.S.=> Lastly/Again - Funny my code ran 5x perfectly here too, eh?

    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42014943

    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42016015

    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42014957

    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42014957

    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42015649

    (As well as 100's of times the past 1.5-2 yrs. now using it vs. trolls like yourself... perfect, every single time!)

    * Care to EXPLAIN those PERFECT OUTPUTS, (lol) 'CruTcHy'?

    So much for this "tidbit" from you, eh (lol) 'CruTcHy':

    ---

    "i have never been talking about the code that you actually run in your python interpreter" - by crutchy (1949900) on Sunday November 18, @04:02AM (#42017797)

    Man - First of all - You can't even write ENGLISH properly - sentences begin with capital letters

    Perhaps it's MY FAULT here, lol (not)... How on EARTH could I expect you to write maintainable code WITH error trapping?

    Clue/New NEWS/NewsFlash: That's the code of MINE'S providing WHAT YOU NEED shown in the links above (& for others like you, as trolls, probably you posting again as ac)... lmao!

    What's THAT kids? Oh, yes - that's right: You GUESSED IT - A dose of "ReVeRsE-PsyChoLoGy"... lmao!

    ... apk

    1. Re:'CruTcHy': No errtraps != good code... apk by symbolset · · Score: 1

      How did I know you would be here?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  60. 'CruTcHy' (lol): No errtraps != good code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOUR "CODE" lacked error trapping here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42016197 (if you call using prebuilt functions coding, that is - more like a kid using legos, lol!)...

    ---

    Additionally - Didn't YOU say THIS also, in regards to coding:

    "...cos we all try to write code that "looks cool" and you know, writing code that functions and easy to debug is all of secondary importance" - by crutchy (1949900) on Sunday November 18, @02:55AM (#42017605)

    FROM -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42017605

    "?"

    QUESTION - Where's YOUR code that functions AND is easy to debug?

    ---

    It isn't - LMAO:

    * You write code like a NOOB does, completely omitting error trapping... and the proof's right in that 1st link above!

    APK

    P.S.=> Lastly/Again - Funny my code ran 5x perfectly here too, eh?

    ---

    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42014943

    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42016015

    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42014957

    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42014957

    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42015649

    ---

    (As well as 100's of times the past 1.5-2 yrs. now using it vs. trolls like yourself... perfect, every single time!)

    * Care to EXPLAIN those PERFECT OUTPUTS, (lol) 'CruTcHy'?

    So much for this "tidbit" from you, eh (lol) 'CruTcHy':

    ---

    "i have never been talking about the code that you actually run in your python interpreter" - by crutchy (1949900) on Sunday November 18, @04:02AM (#42017797)

    Man - First of all - You can't even write ENGLISH properly - sentences begin with capital letters!

    Perhaps it's MY FAULT here, lol (not)... How on EARTH could I expect you to write maintainable code WITH error trapping?

    Clue/New NEWS/NewsFlash: That's the code of MINE'S providing WHAT YOU NEED shown in the links above (& for others like you, as trolls, probably you posting again as ac)... rotflmao!

    What's THAT kids? Oh, yes - that's right: You GUESSED IT - A dose of "ReVeRsE-PsyChoLoGy"... lmao!

    ... apk

    1. Re:'CruTcHy' (lol): No errtraps != good code by crutchy · · Score: 1

      noob

    2. Re:'CruTcHy' (lol): No errtraps != good code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i just love how you whine and complain like a little bitch that people 'trolling' and 'stalking' you then you go and do exactly that.

    3. Re:'CruTcHy' (lol): No errtraps != good code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      noobs put out code without error handlers crutchy. You're a noob doing that much.

  61. 'CruTcHy' (lol): No errtraps != good code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOUR "CODE" lacked error trapping here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42016197 (if you call using prebuilt functions coding, that is - more like a kid using legos, lol!)...

    ---

    Additionally - Didn't YOU say THIS also, in regards to coding:

    "...cos we all try to write code that "looks cool" and you know, writing code that functions and easy to debug is all of secondary importance" - by crutchy (1949900) on Sunday November 18, @02:55AM (#42017605)

    FROM -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42017605

    "?"

    QUESTION - Where's YOUR code that functions AND is easy to debug?

    ---

    It isn't - LMAO:

    * You write code like a NOOB does, completely omitting error trapping... and the proof's right in that 1st link above!

    APK

    P.S.=> Lastly/Again - Funny my code ran 5x perfectly here too, eh?

    ---

    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42014943

    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42016015

    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42014957

    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42014957

    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3258205&cid=42015649

    ---

    (As well as 100's of times the past 1.5-2 yrs. now using it vs. trolls like yourself... perfect, every single time!)

    * Care to EXPLAIN those PERFECT OUTPUTS, (lol) 'CruTcHy'?

    So much for this "tidbit" from you, eh (lol) 'CruTcHy':

    ---

    "i have never been talking about the code that you actually run in your python interpreter" - by crutchy (1949900) on Sunday November 18, @04:02AM (#42017797)

    Man - First of all - You can't even write ENGLISH properly - sentences begin with capital letters!

    Perhaps it's MY FAULT here, lol (not)... How on EARTH could I expect you to write maintainable code WITH error trapping?

    Clue/New NEWS/Newsflash : That's the code of MINE'S providing WHAT YOU NEED shown in the links above (& for others like you, as trolls, probably you posting again as ac)... rotflmao!

    What's THAT kids? Oh, yes - that's right: You GUESSED IT - A dose of "ReVeRsE-PsyChoLoGy"... lmao!

    ... apk