Jesus Christ. How many times does the WaPo have to put up some breathless "Anonymous sources say that Trump is secretly Putin's bitch, we got him this time guys really!" story before we stop believing this crap?
Podesta. Works. For. The. WaPo. You know, this Podesta? Hillary's Campaign Chair?
These articles are DNC Cointelpro. The Liberal version of Fox News and Breitbart. Nothing more, nothing less. Stop giving them attention.
"Everyone I Don't Like is Russian: The Emotional Child's Guide to Political Debate."
Yes kiddos, this classic is back from the red scare era with a new printing! See also the new sequels, "Everyone I Don't Like is Alt-Right," "Everyone I Don't Like is a Fascist," and announcing a discount closeout sale on that classic bestseller from yesteryear, "Everyone I Don't Like is Hitler."
Also check out our new anonymous autobiography: "Antifa Tales: Why Assaulting and Attempting to Murder our Political Opponents In The Street Won't End Badly This Time Guys, We Swear!"
Because if you can't make an argument, call the other team a name. The Left in America doing so has worked out great so far... for the Republicans.
You know as well as everyone else that attacks can and have been spoofed.
Do you REALLY think that if the Russian Government was going to do something so in your face as what you suggest that they'd just jump on Planeta.ru and go to it?
Sophistry.
Desperation. They'd rather incite a war with a nuclear power than admit that Hillary Clinton wasn't electable, something everyone and their mother tried to tell them a year ago.
This is a factoid; there is no real reason to not think that the Democratic Party hack is 90% due to the internal grievances with the party misconduct toward Sanders: some intern dumped the data and then shared it to expose such petty behaviour.
They're already suppressing it. The various hashtags talking about this were artificially blocked from trending.
What is the next step they could take? Auto-hiding tweets talking about it? (They're already doing that.) Banning users for talking about it? Auto-removing discussion of his name?
At what point do calls for the blatant support for a single politician or suppressing support for others cross the line into political censorship and attempts at manipulating the election?
The virus writers went elsewhere and people forgot. The CIA didn't forget.
But the 'feature' is useless if it's so easy to detect. Bet they never let it into the wide of their own secure networks, for fear of their politicians getting 'caught' and embarrassed.
Embarrassed? They don't embarrass politicians they catch. They secure funding from politicians they catch.
Obfuscate that enough and put it someplace that Microsoft Office auto-loads and bammo. Instant tracking, no software needed. This is Spam Email 101 tactics here.
WWIV + LORD + Tradewars. That was middle school in a nutshell, on a 14.4 bbs with a phone cord strung out from my room to the living room to sneak on at 1 AM...
No need to. The CIA created an entire new NSA inside the CIA. Called CCI (Center for Cyber Intelligence) it was technically under the CIA so it's not subject to the disclosure rules the NSA was... and they just didn't tell anyone that they were doing it so the disclosure rules the CIA was under didn't matter, either.
Possibly. What would the kinetic force be of something -- lets say 2 tons of something -- being launched from the Moon to Earth at Moon Escape velocity? How about using conventional rocketry but starting from the moon?
Given that histrionic nutjob's past, she probably got it from Gundam or the later Mega Man X / Zero games, although it's possible it came from "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" or maybe the lensman series. Or maybe Honor Harrington, which refers to Harsh Mistress when mentioning the trope...
And obviously watch HOW they get to their solution, ie. not by connecting to a chatroom where they have a bunch of friends waiting to help out. Looking up snippets, checking parameters and syntax etc. would obviously be fine, that's what you'll be doing in daily work anyway.
I'd like to see the business that identifies "problematic accounts". In fact, if I were them I'd be very open about it. Otherwise it's censorship.
They can't be transparent, because they're targeting the political opponents of the twitter admins. The second they admit that -- openly or accidentally -- shit is going to hit the fan.
But, it's a direct admission that they were basically gouging for want of competition.
Absolutely. My big question is... I have a PC Build coming up. I went Intel 5 years ago due to lack of a realistic AMD alternative. How good is AMD Ryzen? Is it merely competitive with Intel, or are we back to the golden days of "Buy Intel for brand name, buy AMD if you want to save a few hundred bucks for something just as good?"
Please stop with the racism, PopeRatzo. World War 2 was many years ago, Japan is our trusted ally now. Your horrific anti-Japanese slurs are simply inappropriate in this day and age.
Quite different points though. Sarah Silverman's point being about the grotesquery of Trump, and PewDiePie's being about "it's fine to be an antisemitic little shithead"
No, his point for the clip that was taken out of context was:
* "Youtube Heroes is an Authoritarian nightmare that is going to attract the worst kinds of people." * "The media likes to take things out of context to slander people." * "Hey, there's a thing over here that I'm pointing at." * "This fiverr website is a great example of how surreal the modern world is."
Depending on which of the clips they took out of context you're talking about, of course.
However, do you truly believe that he's a neo nazi?
It doesn't matter if he's a neo-nazi. He put some shit on his little web video and now nobody wants to advertise with him. He made a choice. They made a choice.
Free market at work.
The same Regressive leftist trolls smugly stating that this is fair game to do to PewDiePie also raised unholy living hell when GamerGate did it to Gawker.
The difference being that GG didn't have to lie about Gawker to do their advertiser contacting blitz, whereas the WSJ openly, blatantly lied (via omission) about PewDiePie to his advertisers and network.
One of the videos they cropped to make him look bad was LITERALLY about how the media likes to crop videos to make people look bad.
The WSJ fucked up, bad. No one listened and believed like they were expecting. They're going to have to walk this back, it's literally only a matter of time before they do.
Well, it's important to remember that SJWs are Postmodernists. Postmodernists are nutters who believe things like facts, logic, reasoning, and the scientific method are things that apply to lesser people. That's where you get insane things like "biology is a social construct" or well, Identity Politics in general.
That's a pretty arbitrary definition of "birth defect".
I'm trying to think of other people who arbitrarily defined things as defects... I'm sure there was some group doing that in the 1930s.
And we have a Godwin's law violation everyone! Lets wrap it up before someone on the radical left decides it's ok to start punching everyone in this thread that disagrees with them.
Slashdot Mirror
Jesus Christ. How many times does the WaPo have to put up some breathless "Anonymous sources say that Trump is secretly Putin's bitch, we got him this time guys really!" story before we stop believing this crap?
Podesta. Works. For. The. WaPo. You know, this Podesta? Hillary's Campaign Chair?
These articles are DNC Cointelpro. The Liberal version of Fox News and Breitbart. Nothing more, nothing less. Stop giving them attention.
Spam. They discovered how to send Voicemail Spam. I can't even be mad, that's impressive.
"Everyone I Don't Like is Russian: The Emotional Child's Guide to Political Debate."
Yes kiddos, this classic is back from the red scare era with a new printing! See also the new sequels, "Everyone I Don't Like is Alt-Right," "Everyone I Don't Like is a Fascist," and announcing a discount closeout sale on that classic bestseller from yesteryear, "Everyone I Don't Like is Hitler."
Also check out our new anonymous autobiography: "Antifa Tales: Why Assaulting and Attempting to Murder our Political Opponents In The Street Won't End Badly This Time Guys, We Swear!"
Because if you can't make an argument, call the other team a name. The Left in America doing so has worked out great so far... for the Republicans.
You know as well as everyone else that attacks can and have been spoofed.
Do you REALLY think that if the Russian Government was going to do something so in your face as what you suggest that they'd just jump on Planeta.ru and go to it?
Sophistry.
Desperation. They'd rather incite a war with a nuclear power than admit that Hillary Clinton wasn't electable, something everyone and their mother tried to tell them a year ago.
This is a factoid; there is no real reason to not think that the Democratic Party hack is 90% due to the internal grievances with the party misconduct toward Sanders: some intern dumped the data and then shared it to expose such petty behaviour.
His name was Seth Rich.
Citation needed.
They're already suppressing it. The various hashtags talking about this were artificially blocked from trending.
What is the next step they could take? Auto-hiding tweets talking about it? (They're already doing that.) Banning users for talking about it? Auto-removing discussion of his name?
At what point do calls for the blatant support for a single politician or suppressing support for others cross the line into political censorship and attempts at manipulating the election?
The virus writers went elsewhere and people forgot. The CIA didn't forget.
But the 'feature' is useless if it's so easy to detect. Bet they never let it into the wide of their own secure networks, for fear of their politicians getting 'caught' and embarrassed.
Embarrassed? They don't embarrass politicians they catch. They secure funding from politicians they catch.
No? All it has to be is an external image URL.
hxxp://CIAFRONTWEBSITE .GOV/username=X&IP=Y&OSversion=Z&....
Obfuscate that enough and put it someplace that Microsoft Office auto-loads and bammo. Instant tracking, no software needed. This is Spam Email 101 tactics here.
Hell, it's the same trick they used (via a broken flash plugin) in Operation Pacifier to figure out who was connecting to the FBI's child porn server on TOR. You know, the operation that caused them to repeal the 4th Amendment for anyone using a computer that has TCP/IP installed?
I never thought I'd say this, but can we bring the GNAA guys back? They were less annoying than idiots with Trump Derangement Syndrome.
WWIV + LORD + Tradewars. That was middle school in a nutshell, on a 14.4 bbs with a phone cord strung out from my room to the living room to sneak on at 1 AM...
ITT: The Holy Wars begin.
I wonder how many people and companies are willing to pay for the privilege of virtue signaling?
Quite a lot, actually:
* $1398 from 374 patrons
* $2769 from 822 patrons
* $3225 from 481 patrons
Professional victimhood is a cottage industry.
No need to. The CIA created an entire new NSA inside the CIA. Called CCI (Center for Cyber Intelligence) it was technically under the CIA so it's not subject to the disclosure rules the NSA was... and they just didn't tell anyone that they were doing it so the disclosure rules the CIA was under didn't matter, either.
Possibly. What would the kinetic force be of something -- lets say 2 tons of something -- being launched from the Moon to Earth at Moon Escape velocity? How about using conventional rocketry but starting from the moon?
Given that histrionic nutjob's past, she probably got it from Gundam or the later Mega Man X / Zero games, although it's possible it came from "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" or maybe the lensman series. Or maybe Honor Harrington, which refers to Harsh Mistress when mentioning the trope...
And obviously watch HOW they get to their solution, ie. not by connecting to a chatroom where they have a bunch of friends waiting to help out. Looking up snippets, checking parameters and syntax etc. would obviously be fine, that's what you'll be doing in daily work anyway.
What do you have against Stack Overflow?
I'd like to see the business that identifies "problematic accounts". In fact, if I were them I'd be very open about it. Otherwise it's censorship.
They can't be transparent, because they're targeting the political opponents of the twitter admins. The second they admit that -- openly or accidentally -- shit is going to hit the fan.
But, it's a direct admission that they were basically gouging for want of competition.
Absolutely. My big question is... I have a PC Build coming up. I went Intel 5 years ago due to lack of a realistic AMD alternative. How good is AMD Ryzen? Is it merely competitive with Intel, or are we back to the golden days of "Buy Intel for brand name, buy AMD if you want to save a few hundred bucks for something just as good?"
Please stop with the racism, PopeRatzo. World War 2 was many years ago, Japan is our trusted ally now. Your horrific anti-Japanese slurs are simply inappropriate in this day and age.
Quite different points though. Sarah Silverman's point being about the grotesquery of Trump, and PewDiePie's being about "it's fine to be an antisemitic little shithead"
No, his point for the clip that was taken out of context was:
* "Youtube Heroes is an Authoritarian nightmare that is going to attract the worst kinds of people."
* "The media likes to take things out of context to slander people."
* "Hey, there's a thing over here that I'm pointing at."
* "This fiverr website is a great example of how surreal the modern world is."
Depending on which of the clips they took out of context you're talking about, of course.
First, I encourage all Slashdot readers to take a look at what Xenographic thinks is a "crass racial stereotype".
Second, I don't expect Disney to sponsor my Slashdot comments, nor do I look for the alt-right to spring to my defense because they don't.
Why do you hate the Japanese, PopeRatzo?
It doesn't matter if he's a neo-nazi. He put some shit on his little web video and now nobody wants to advertise with him. He made a choice. They made a choice.
Free market at work.
The same Regressive leftist trolls smugly stating that this is fair game to do to PewDiePie also raised unholy living hell when GamerGate did it to Gawker.
The difference being that GG didn't have to lie about Gawker to do their advertiser contacting blitz, whereas the WSJ openly, blatantly lied (via omission) about PewDiePie to his advertisers and network.
One of the videos they cropped to make him look bad was LITERALLY about how the media likes to crop videos to make people look bad.
The WSJ fucked up, bad. No one listened and believed like they were expecting. They're going to have to walk this back, it's literally only a matter of time before they do.
Infowars? Breitbbart?
Sarah Silverman once went on Conan dressed up as Hitler, complete with stache and Swastika. That's a bit more than a sign.
"Ah, but that's different, she was obviously doing it to make a point."
So was PewDiePie.
Well, it's important to remember that SJWs are Postmodernists. Postmodernists are nutters who believe things like facts, logic, reasoning, and the scientific method are things that apply to lesser people. That's where you get insane things like "biology is a social construct" or well, Identity Politics in general.
That's a pretty arbitrary definition of "birth defect".
I'm trying to think of other people who arbitrarily defined things as defects... I'm sure there was some group doing that in the 1930s.
And we have a Godwin's law violation everyone! Lets wrap it up before someone on the radical left decides it's ok to start punching everyone in this thread that disagrees with them.