I believe the best way to combat the Linux absolutists' and the Linux exclusivists' effect on the future acceptance of Linux is to completely ignore them and push forward with a viable product that people want. Canonical knows that. As does Steam, it seems.
Since any law trumps any preceding law covering the same topic, isn't this just a law that says, "we haven't passed any subsequent internet laws since the passing of this one"...?
I am a very conservative voter than nearly always votes Republican. I also agree that Ann Coulter is a polemic that speaks with intention of inciting outrage. She often does more harm for the conservative cause than good because she lacks grace and decency that honors the humanity in those she disagrees with.
But that doesn't mean that it is appropriate for a President of a school to make a judgement that she should therefor not be allowed to communicate. That is not the country we live in and it does not represent our value of allowing speech we disagree with.
The ACLU once fought for the right of Nazi's to protest in a Jewish neighborhood. And we survived it very well. Today the intolerance of strong language we have prevents us from even expressing things rudely. We have indeed fallen very far.
You can simply change the example solution so it can be caught by a teacher actually examining the work of the student. Yet you are still looking for an automatic solution? Let the teacher continue to be a teacher and take your geek points and continue being a geek.
Wouldn't it be more becoming of a Vice President to have a hobby of addressing ethical concerns of how their company handles bidding processes than obsessing over someone who blew a whistle?
That's his business.
I am against this trend of sticking our noses with moralistic attitudes on the tip of them into the decisions of every person. He knows what it would mean to him as an individual to sell or not to sell. We are all unqualified to know that.
If you would like to make a difference in US politics, then you certainly do not want anything to do with a third party. Look at Ron Paul. Love him or hate him, he had absolutely no influence in US politics or policy as a Libertarian. Instead he did the smart thing: he found the party that most closely approximated his ideals and he worked within to influence change in that party. Today the Gold Standard is official Republican party platform. The Federal Reserve will almost certainly be audited. His influence is felt because he did not stand at the edge and throw stones. He got involved and worked with people on common ground to change the system to further his ideals.
Another nail in the coffin of higher moral calling of the Hippocratic Oath. In a day when we change the meaning and intent of very clear statements of moral commitment, it is sad to see those that have sworn to do no harm bend those rules to meet our degrading cultural norms instead of sticking to those oaths to attempt to lift the our commitment to honorable code as a whole. When I look at a society that has an attitiude toward life that doesn't value it unless it is convenient and easy to confront, I see a society that is tearing itself down.
"I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel..." Of course our modern "wisdom" has disdain for any wisdom that comes before it. We are so enlightened after all.
Because this question IS EXTREMELEY dependent upon circumstances (i.e., a spouse's income, vulnerable assets, exposure, risks involved with work) the better question is, "Who would be a good person to ask about whether I should incorporate?"
My answer to that question would be an experienced financial advisor.
Not slash dot.
... one more giant leap in the increasingly insignificant field known as "The Arts". "The Arts" used to mean making something of beauty that inspired something uplifting in other people. Today it means a narcissitic exercise in avant-garde.
I recently went back to school to get a degree in Mechanical Engineering. Paper + Pencil were indispensable. I tried a netbook and I really liked it for its own sake. Because it was so useful for many other activities other than taking notes, I always carried it. But for notes, my subject at least, required that I make corresponding diagrams when taking notes. That was the deal killer. For non-technical, non-visual courses and for courses on programming languages, I always found the netbook perfect.
... who thought it was called Metro as a way of saying, "Hey, this isn't gay!"... ? I thought it was obvious. I guess my horribleUi-phobia clouds my judgement.
The best shot one has at getting a Score of 5 Insightful on Slashdot, is to make a far left-leaning anti-Republican rant. Relevance to the actual post is options. Thank you for demonstrating this Microlith.
The outrage you hear from a lot of people regarding the US policies on many issues can be easily understood when you consider this one idea:
Are the policies of the US in recent times approaching or moving away from the policies of North Korea?
Oh, the such apologetic attitude of the greenies.
Myself, I am a driver who recognizes it as the most positive lifestyle choice I can make to promote the well-being of my family. It allows me to work in a promising career without subjecting my family to the insane living conditions of urban environments.
We need to stop and rethink the morality of trying to live a life of committing zero harm. The superior morality is to live a life that does such abundant good that the small amount of harm we commit is insignificant. After all, we will always do some amount of harm.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, I just made up the word exclusivist. If any grammar/verbiage fascists can't understand what it means, I'd be happy to define it for you.
I believe the best way to combat the Linux absolutists' and the Linux exclusivists' effect on the future acceptance of Linux is to completely ignore them and push forward with a viable product that people want. Canonical knows that. As does Steam, it seems.
Since any law trumps any preceding law covering the same topic, isn't this just a law that says, "we haven't passed any subsequent internet laws since the passing of this one"...?
I am a very conservative voter than nearly always votes Republican. I also agree that Ann Coulter is a polemic that speaks with intention of inciting outrage. She often does more harm for the conservative cause than good because she lacks grace and decency that honors the humanity in those she disagrees with. But that doesn't mean that it is appropriate for a President of a school to make a judgement that she should therefor not be allowed to communicate. That is not the country we live in and it does not represent our value of allowing speech we disagree with. The ACLU once fought for the right of Nazi's to protest in a Jewish neighborhood. And we survived it very well. Today the intolerance of strong language we have prevents us from even expressing things rudely. We have indeed fallen very far.
Linux Mint comes with Dropbox. And that is a good thing.
So far Netflix has run on Boxee, Android and the Chrome OS from Google. What they have against Linux is therefore really hard to understand.
You can simply change the example solution so it can be caught by a teacher actually examining the work of the student. Yet you are still looking for an automatic solution? Let the teacher continue to be a teacher and take your geek points and continue being a geek.
Wouldn't it be more becoming of a Vice President to have a hobby of addressing ethical concerns of how their company handles bidding processes than obsessing over someone who blew a whistle?
That's his business. I am against this trend of sticking our noses with moralistic attitudes on the tip of them into the decisions of every person. He knows what it would mean to him as an individual to sell or not to sell. We are all unqualified to know that.
If you would like to make a difference in US politics, then you certainly do not want anything to do with a third party. Look at Ron Paul. Love him or hate him, he had absolutely no influence in US politics or policy as a Libertarian. Instead he did the smart thing: he found the party that most closely approximated his ideals and he worked within to influence change in that party. Today the Gold Standard is official Republican party platform. The Federal Reserve will almost certainly be audited. His influence is felt because he did not stand at the edge and throw stones. He got involved and worked with people on common ground to change the system to further his ideals.
How long before the myth that you must be 20 to be a good programmer dies out?
Another nail in the coffin of higher moral calling of the Hippocratic Oath. In a day when we change the meaning and intent of very clear statements of moral commitment, it is sad to see those that have sworn to do no harm bend those rules to meet our degrading cultural norms instead of sticking to those oaths to attempt to lift the our commitment to honorable code as a whole. When I look at a society that has an attitiude toward life that doesn't value it unless it is convenient and easy to confront, I see a society that is tearing itself down. "I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel..." Of course our modern "wisdom" has disdain for any wisdom that comes before it. We are so enlightened after all.
Firefox 16.0.1 just installed on my Droid Bionic automatically. OTA. Fast enough for you?
Because this question IS EXTREMELEY dependent upon circumstances (i.e., a spouse's income, vulnerable assets, exposure, risks involved with work) the better question is, "Who would be a good person to ask about whether I should incorporate?" My answer to that question would be an experienced financial advisor. Not slash dot.
Kate Darling researches media. Not law. Not robotics. Not even marketing of robots. Media. Why is she being listened to here?
... one more giant leap in the increasingly insignificant field known as "The Arts". "The Arts" used to mean making something of beauty that inspired something uplifting in other people. Today it means a narcissitic exercise in avant-garde.
I recently went back to school to get a degree in Mechanical Engineering. Paper + Pencil were indispensable. I tried a netbook and I really liked it for its own sake. Because it was so useful for many other activities other than taking notes, I always carried it. But for notes, my subject at least, required that I make corresponding diagrams when taking notes. That was the deal killer. For non-technical, non-visual courses and for courses on programming languages, I always found the netbook perfect.
... who thought it was called Metro as a way of saying, "Hey, this isn't gay!" ... ? I thought it was obvious. I guess my horribleUi-phobia clouds my judgement.
The best shot one has at getting a Score of 5 Insightful on Slashdot, is to make a far left-leaning anti-Republican rant. Relevance to the actual post is options. Thank you for demonstrating this Microlith.
Why?
2.4 + 2.4 = 4.8 It's a rounding scheme. Let it go.
...is that you hate driving. Once you don't have to drive anymore moving fast loses 90% of its value.
The outrage you hear from a lot of people regarding the US policies on many issues can be easily understood when you consider this one idea: Are the policies of the US in recent times approaching or moving away from the policies of North Korea?
Oh, the such apologetic attitude of the greenies. Myself, I am a driver who recognizes it as the most positive lifestyle choice I can make to promote the well-being of my family. It allows me to work in a promising career without subjecting my family to the insane living conditions of urban environments. We need to stop and rethink the morality of trying to live a life of committing zero harm. The superior morality is to live a life that does such abundant good that the small amount of harm we commit is insignificant. After all, we will always do some amount of harm.
...in order to harvest the power from space, concentrate it and beam it down to Earth.