Right...and big cities were strongly a northeastern system. The problem is they move to a region that doesn't have huge cities. They migrate toward towns and turn them into cities. Then when those become big cities and destroy the region, the migrate to another region and repeat the process - so on and so on.
I think if I was Amazon, I would mention this. And then also inform the agency that for ever dollar they are fined. They will put an equivalent fund in the pursuit of a lawsuit.
The media claimed that Trump mocked a disabled reporter, or more to the point, that Trump mocked a reporter for his disability. Trump did in fact mock a reporter who is disabled. However, there are videos on youtube that will show you that those body movements of his are used regularly, not for mocking disabilities but to personify his view of someone who doesn't have an answer.
Most of the mainstream media also claimed that Donald Trump said soldiers that commit suicide are weak. He said no such thing. Go to youtube and watch the actual speech. He was discussing the lack of care available for our veterans, particularly the lack of mental healthcare. He was discussing triggers, and our soldiers being left without the support they deserved. Every soldier and veteran I know who watched that video loved it. In fact, it was the first, and almost the only time I watched Donald Trump and thought to myself that he looked presidential.
Watch MSNBC, they'll show you protestors at a Tea Party rally outside one of President Obama's townhall meetings. They'll show you a man carrying an AR-15 on his back. They'll state how this is intimidating and seemingly rather racist. Go to youtube and you'll find the another video of that same rally. Except this video will clearly show the man in question with an AR-15 strapped to his back is in fact a black American.
So ya.....trust me, conservatives are very aware of how fake most of the mainstream news is. Liberals on the other hand are stuck thinking the only fake news is Fox/Faux News. Well, it is fairly fake. But it doesn't have the market nor is it even close to being top dog.
I have also noticed an interesting trend recently. A number of political articles on Snopes and fact check sites, where the conservative viewpoint or statement was in fact CORRECT. And they even discuss the evidence of such. But interestingly enough, in several of these cases the fact check articles NEVER post a conclusion. They don't include their "True or False" meters, etc.
And I have wondered, why is it that these articles where either the criticism of a conservative is debunked or the criticism of a Democrat confirmed, are not given truth-meters?
Hmmm...
Because, these sites are extremely biased. Even when their articles are correct, they regularly pick and choose what issues to pursue. And numerous substantiated criticisms of Democrats will never ever get an article on these fact check sites.
We went other places. You damn New England liberals follow us everywhere. You ruined the north east. You ruined California. You ruined Colorado.
It's like you much up a place so bad that it's unlivable, then decide to move to the region where folks who don't want invasive government moved to when they left you. And then you just pass all the same stupid laws and taxes over until that place is ruined. In 20-30 years, Denver, Colorado will be an insane mecca of taxes and regulations that will be unbearable. Then you liberals will leave and move to Idaho, the Dakotas, etc.
Those states might get smart and just start shooting you all upon arrival. Though I think eliminating your right to vote in state elections for 5 years until you gain a feeling for the culture might be more prudent.
There isn't a conservative out there disagreeing with you. But well, gee.....mainstream news is so actively liberal that they'll give their presidential candidate the debate questions.
Honestly, the FBI, seems to have a knack for being left a bread crumb and thinking they have found the culprit. Heck, more recent revelations about N. Korea's internet network has cast doubt as to whether it could of even handled the quantities of data in a timely fashion.
Per Wiki Doubts about accusations against North Korea[edit]
Members of the press and various cybersecurity experts have expressed doubt about the claims that North Korea was behind the hack. Cyber security experts, independently analyzing the hack separately from the FBI—including Kurt Stammberger from cyber security firm Norse,[86][87] DEFCON organizer and Cloudflare researcher Marc Rogers,[88] Hector Monsegur,[89] and Kim Zetter, a security journalist at Wired magazine[90]—have tended to agree that North Korea might not be behind the attack.
Michael Hiltzik, a Los Angeles Times journalist, said that all evidence against North Korea was "circumstantial" and that some cybersecurity experts were "skeptical" about accusations against the government.[91] Cybersecurity expert Lucas Zaichkowsky said, "State-sponsored attackers don't create cool names for themselves like 'Guardians of Peace' and promote their activity to the public."[92] Kim Zetter of Wired magazine called released evidence against the government "flimsy".[93] Former hacker Hector Monsegur, who once hacked into Sony, explained to CBS News that exfiltrating one or one hundred terabytes of data would have taken months or years, not weeks, "without anyone noticing". Monsegur doubted the accusations due to North Korea's possibly insufficient infrastructure to handle much data. He believed that it could have been either Chinese, Russian, or North Korean sponsored hackers working outside of the country, but most likely to be the deed of a Sony employee.[94]
Stammberger provided to the FBI Norse's findings that suggest the hack was an inside job, stating, "Sony was not just hacked; this is a company that was essentially nuked from the inside. We are very confident that this was not an attack master-minded by North Korea and that insiders were key to the implementation of one of the most devastating attacks in history."[95] Stammberger believes that the security failure may have originated from six disgruntled former Sony employees, based on their past skill sets and discussions these people made in chat rooms. Norse employees identified these people from a list of workers that were eliminated from Sony during a restructuring in May 2014, and noted that some had made very public and angry responses to their firing, and would be in appropriate positions to identify the means to access secure parts of Sony's servers.[96][97][98] After a private briefing lasting three hours, the FBI formally rejected Norse's alternative assessment.[99]
You know, the one cited for proof of undermining the U.S. election process. Well, I've read it, and I will sum it up with the following:
TOTAL BUNK...
Just some highlights...
"Russian efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election represent the most recent expression of Moscow’s longstanding desire to undermine the US-led liberal democratic order"
This was funny, so they're only focused on undermining the liberal democratic order, conservatives and libertarians - YOU ARE SAFE!
"We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him."
The fact that statement is made, shows that this entire intelligence review is utter BS and mere politics. There is NO reason for Russia to be supporting Trump, and the actions could have just as easily benefited Bernie Sanders. If they were to accuse Russia of a motive, it would be to prevent Hillary being elected. Nothing to do with her competitors.
"When it appeared to Moscow that Secretary Clinton was likely to win the election" Really, cause the appearances and statements across U.S. media was that this was an apparent given that Hillary would win and be our next president. This was de facto for a year or more.
I saw in another article that they had record of Russian officials celebrating upon Trump's win. And clearly this means they were for Trump. Bogus. I didn't want Trump, but I was happy to not have Hillary. And I believe the Russians simply did NOT want Hillary - for good reason.
"Russia’s state-run propaganda machine contributed to the influence campaign by serving as a platform for Kremlin messaging to Russian and international audiences."
Which has zero affect on U.S. populace. Really, so what...we have tons of evidence that the mainstream media was a propaganda machine for Hillary which went so far as to rigged debates and more.
"Kremlin’s TV Seeks To Influence Politics, Fuel Discontent in US" Really? How many American's were watching Kremlin TV?
Basically, this report is Russian media outlets denigrated Hillary, while U.S. media outlets denigrated Bernie and Trump. And it's only okay for foreign media to denigrate Trump, not Hillary.
"Putin publicly pointed to the Panama Papers disclosure and the Olympic doping scandal as US-directed efforts to defame Russia, suggesting he sought to use disclosures to discredit the image of the United States and cast it as hypocritical."
HE IS RIGHT, IT WAS!!!
Do I doubt Russia has hacked U.S. systems. Not one bit. Every government is doing it. Though few at the level the U.S. is. We've conducted more hacking and election affecting than every other country in the world has combined. So threatening military action and retaliation is not only hypocritical, it's ludicrously insane.
Gee, so per the document Russia has had agents involved in monitoring the election process since the Carter days. Of course they do. So do we. Of course they're going to want to have insight into who will be the head of their largest rival. Duh... nothing to see here, go home.
"Russia Times aired a documentary about the Occupy Wall Street movement on 1, 2, and 4 November. RT framed the movement as a fight against "the ruling class" and described the current US political system as corrupt and dominated by corporations."
Um, ya...seems like the truth to me.
So far as I read this, it pretty much appears to be 25 pages going thru decades of Russia and U.S. opposing opinions and expressions. Well duh...we did have a cold war. And even after it's pretty much been lukewarm. So none of this crap is evidence for U.S. claims being made against Russia currently.
Not even the same price, just $5-$10 more. The problem is, the 3D versions never get that big discount or cheap releases. Where as most films that have been out for a couple of years unless they're major blockbusters, can be picked up for $7-$15. But they still want $35-$45 for the 3D version.
The TV's weren't that expensive once the passive models came into existence. But content...
First, there were few 3D channels available, and they were put into top tier premium packages. Rather than a simple add on $15/month for all 3D channels.
Second, 3D Blu-ray pricing is whacked. They essentially price 3D Blu-ray $5-$15 above the MSRP price of the standard Blu-Ray. But blu-rays rarely sell at MSRP, and with deals, promo editions, often sale far less. So I'd see a Blu-ray, it's MSRP price would be $35. The 3D bundle would be $45.
Except, you'd find that standard Blu-ray for $19.99. And on sale for $14.99. But the 3Ds were rarely discounted similarly, except for some occasional Black Friday deals. So the end result is you want the film on 3D. But when the difference between the standard Blu-ray and the 3D Blu-ray is $15 vs $35, it's nigh impossible to justify buying it. And often, the end result was I didn't buy either version. I almost exclusively buy 3D versions.
But many movies are far superior in 3D. Especially sci-fi space films.
It seems like ALL these projects are killed off before they're ever even really released to the market. Or hey, we released a phone and we have two basic modules (extended battery and IR remote) with more to come, someday...okay....never.
But darn it, I am TIRED of thin phones with small batteries. Give me a module phone system where I can stick a battery module that will last 2+ days of use rather than a few hours. Give me a module that lets me output 5.1 surround sound. Module for RAID5 SD card storage. Module for printing.
Truthfully, what we really need is an interconnect specification. For example, said spec could allow DSLR manufacturers to simply make the lens and sensor body. Storage, screen, and all that would connect via the interconnect specification.
Essentially, we'd reach the point where we have Personal Processing Devices. You no longer have desktops or laptops. You have your PPD, connect to a dock and have keyboard, screen, additional storage. Add a wireless module. We'll get there...eventually. But just like smartphones and electric cars, it's going to take an innovator to put it together correctly to make it take off.
And their starting this whole "slimmer = better" race.
1. Slimmer phones are harder to hold, and almost impossible to hold with your shoulder when you just need both hands for a moment.
2. Slimmer phones have smaller batteries and less battery life.
3. Slimmer phones push phone makers to go with fixed batteries and to remove SD slots.
***
What I want....
A thicker phone...with a large removable battery. And if you really want to make me happy, give me three mico-SD card slots and a RAID option. And guess what, thicker phones don't bend a.k.a. iPhone 6 Plus and are less likely to go up in smoke like the Note 7.
"deploying malicious software which is not available in the public domain"
What the heck does that mean? Does this mean the hacking tools don't have a GPL or similar license that grants free use? Or not commonly used by hackers? If these tools have been deployed to machines, I am sure someone has picked them up and modified them. It's like the "I Love You" worm. It was quickly modified by many.
But how many individuals has our government hacked, listened in on, and killed?
You know, the same guy who adamantly testified to both America and Congress that the NSA was not violating the Constitution and spying on millions of Americans.
"Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of Investigation are releasing declassified technical information on Russian civilian and military intelligence service cyber activity"
I wager it'll show that two Russians engaged in criminal activities of identity theft and credit card fraud. But with little tie to the Russian government. And the rest will just be a flourish of high language about spear-phishing attacks. And zero evidence will actually be provided.
The DNC is far from my country. The so-called attack, merely showed that Hillary and the DNC was engaged in election rigging (attacking our country).
This administration has provided zero proof of Russia's involvement nor motive.
The only proof we have is that Hillary, exclaimed this was in retaliation to her mucking about in Russia's election. *facepalm* So let's say ALL of this is true. That means this was retaliation on U.S. for interfering in their election.
The Arctic ice is melting, the Antarctic ice is growing.
Okay, let's say we have a metal pole, with a top and bottom. It is warmed by a heat source. If the heat source is centrally located, the center will be warm and the ends equally cool.
However, if that heat source is elevated, the upper half of the metal pole will be warmer, and the bottom half cooler. The top of the pole will be significantly warmer than the bottom of the pole.
Presently, our sun has a HUGE hole in the northern hemisphere. "The low density of coronal holes is also responsible for high-speed solar winds. These streams of solar particles blow off the coronal holes about three times faster than they do in higher-density areas of the sun, according to the statement." http://www.space.com/33047-nas...
Why is this significant? Well, we know sunspots correlate to climate temperatures. Less sun spots equal colder periods, more sunspots, correlate to warmer periods.
"Ituitively one may assume the that total solar irradiance would decrease as the number of (optically dark) sunspots increased. However direct satellite measurements of irradiance have shown just the opposite to be the case. This means that more sunspots deliver more energy to the atmosphere, so that global temperatures should rise. " http://www-das.uwyo.edu/~geert...
Okay, so we have a large hole. The hole likely affects the suns gravitational / magnetic forces adjusting the amount of thermal energy released. If so we likely have a thermal gradient in which the higher north you go on the solar plane, the warmer it is. This would explain why the Arctic would be melting and the Antarctic adding ice.
Slashdot Mirror
Right...and big cities were strongly a northeastern system. The problem is they move to a region that doesn't have huge cities. They migrate toward towns and turn them into cities. Then when those become big cities and destroy the region, the migrate to another region and repeat the process - so on and so on.
See Colorado for current example.
No one asked to live in an island. We just asked that you quit cutting down all the trees and then moving after you turn lush forests into deserts.
Right....and that wasn't intended.....
We shoot/fire the messengers, but the not the authors of the message.
I think the point is that Fox has 2.3, but than if the others all have 1.5 million with CNN, NBC, ABC, HuffPo, NY Times, etc, etc, etc, etc.
Sorry, I think the commenter just thought readers were intelligent enough to understand that.
I think if I was Amazon, I would mention this. And then also inform the agency that for ever dollar they are fined. They will put an equivalent fund in the pursuit of a lawsuit.
So brick and mortar stores do this ALL THE TIME.... they never cared. But Amazon does it. BAM!
I find YouTube to be the best fact checker.
The media claimed that Trump mocked a disabled reporter, or more to the point, that Trump mocked a reporter for his disability. Trump did in fact mock a reporter who is disabled. However, there are videos on youtube that will show you that those body movements of his are used regularly, not for mocking disabilities but to personify his view of someone who doesn't have an answer.
Most of the mainstream media also claimed that Donald Trump said soldiers that commit suicide are weak. He said no such thing. Go to youtube and watch the actual speech. He was discussing the lack of care available for our veterans, particularly the lack of mental healthcare. He was discussing triggers, and our soldiers being left without the support they deserved. Every soldier and veteran I know who watched that video loved it. In fact, it was the first, and almost the only time I watched Donald Trump and thought to myself that he looked presidential.
Watch MSNBC, they'll show you protestors at a Tea Party rally outside one of President Obama's townhall meetings. They'll show you a man carrying an AR-15 on his back. They'll state how this is intimidating and seemingly rather racist. Go to youtube and you'll find the another video of that same rally. Except this video will clearly show the man in question with an AR-15 strapped to his back is in fact a black American.
So ya.....trust me, conservatives are very aware of how fake most of the mainstream news is. Liberals on the other hand are stuck thinking the only fake news is Fox/Faux News. Well, it is fairly fake. But it doesn't have the market nor is it even close to being top dog.
I have also noticed an interesting trend recently. A number of political articles on Snopes and fact check sites, where the conservative viewpoint or statement was in fact CORRECT. And they even discuss the evidence of such. But interestingly enough, in several of these cases the fact check articles NEVER post a conclusion. They don't include their "True or False" meters, etc.
And I have wondered, why is it that these articles where either the criticism of a conservative is debunked or the criticism of a Democrat confirmed, are not given truth-meters?
Hmmm...
Because, these sites are extremely biased. Even when their articles are correct, they regularly pick and choose what issues to pursue. And numerous substantiated criticisms of Democrats will never ever get an article on these fact check sites.
We went other places. You damn New England liberals follow us everywhere. You ruined the north east. You ruined California. You ruined Colorado.
It's like you much up a place so bad that it's unlivable, then decide to move to the region where folks who don't want invasive government moved to when they left you. And then you just pass all the same stupid laws and taxes over until that place is ruined. In 20-30 years, Denver, Colorado will be an insane mecca of taxes and regulations that will be unbearable. Then you liberals will leave and move to Idaho, the Dakotas, etc.
Those states might get smart and just start shooting you all upon arrival. Though I think eliminating your right to vote in state elections for 5 years until you gain a feeling for the culture might be more prudent.
There isn't a conservative out there disagreeing with you. But well, gee.....mainstream news is so actively liberal that they'll give their presidential candidate the debate questions.
if find("Russia+Hacked+Election+Trump)
Honestly, the FBI, seems to have a knack for being left a bread crumb and thinking they have found the culprit. Heck, more recent revelations about N. Korea's internet network has cast doubt as to whether it could of even handled the quantities of data in a timely fashion.
http://www.businessinsider.com...
http://gawker.com/a-lot-of-sma...
Per Wiki
Doubts about accusations against North Korea[edit]
Members of the press and various cybersecurity experts have expressed doubt about the claims that North Korea was behind the hack. Cyber security experts, independently analyzing the hack separately from the FBI—including Kurt Stammberger from cyber security firm Norse,[86][87] DEFCON organizer and Cloudflare researcher Marc Rogers,[88] Hector Monsegur,[89] and Kim Zetter, a security journalist at Wired magazine[90]—have tended to agree that North Korea might not be behind the attack.
Michael Hiltzik, a Los Angeles Times journalist, said that all evidence against North Korea was "circumstantial" and that some cybersecurity experts were "skeptical" about accusations against the government.[91] Cybersecurity expert Lucas Zaichkowsky said, "State-sponsored attackers don't create cool names for themselves like 'Guardians of Peace' and promote their activity to the public."[92] Kim Zetter of Wired magazine called released evidence against the government "flimsy".[93] Former hacker Hector Monsegur, who once hacked into Sony, explained to CBS News that exfiltrating one or one hundred terabytes of data would have taken months or years, not weeks, "without anyone noticing". Monsegur doubted the accusations due to North Korea's possibly insufficient infrastructure to handle much data. He believed that it could have been either Chinese, Russian, or North Korean sponsored hackers working outside of the country, but most likely to be the deed of a Sony employee.[94]
Stammberger provided to the FBI Norse's findings that suggest the hack was an inside job, stating, "Sony was not just hacked; this is a company that was essentially nuked from the inside. We are very confident that this was not an attack master-minded by North Korea and that insiders were key to the implementation of one of the most devastating attacks in history."[95] Stammberger believes that the security failure may have originated from six disgruntled former Sony employees, based on their past skill sets and discussions these people made in chat rooms. Norse employees identified these people from a list of workers that were eliminated from Sony during a restructuring in May 2014, and noted that some had made very public and angry responses to their firing, and would be in appropriate positions to identify the means to access secure parts of Sony's servers.[96][97][98] After a private briefing lasting three hours, the FBI formally rejected Norse's alternative assessment.[99]
Correct.
Where's the Beef? Here is the Declassified version of the U.S. Intelligence Report regarding Russia.
https://www.dni.gov/files/docu...
You know, the one cited for proof of undermining the U.S. election process. Well, I've read it, and I will sum it up with the following:
TOTAL BUNK...
Just some highlights...
"Russian efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election represent the most recent expression of Moscow’s longstanding desire to undermine the US-led liberal democratic order"
This was funny, so they're only focused on undermining the liberal democratic order, conservatives and libertarians - YOU ARE SAFE!
"We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him."
The fact that statement is made, shows that this entire intelligence review is utter BS and mere politics. There is NO reason for Russia to be supporting Trump, and the actions could have just as easily benefited Bernie Sanders. If they were to accuse Russia of a motive, it would be to prevent Hillary being elected. Nothing to do with her competitors.
"When it appeared to Moscow that Secretary Clinton was likely to win the election" Really, cause the appearances and statements across U.S. media was that this was an apparent given that Hillary would win and be our next president. This was de facto for a year or more.
I saw in another article that they had record of Russian officials celebrating upon Trump's win. And clearly this means they were for Trump. Bogus. I didn't want Trump, but I was happy to not have Hillary. And I believe the Russians simply did NOT want Hillary - for good reason.
"Russia’s state-run propaganda machine contributed to the influence campaign by serving as a platform for Kremlin messaging to Russian and international audiences."
Which has zero affect on U.S. populace. Really, so what...we have tons of evidence that the mainstream media was a propaganda machine for Hillary which went so far as to rigged debates and more.
"Kremlin’s TV Seeks To Influence Politics, Fuel Discontent in US" Really? How many American's were watching Kremlin TV?
Basically, this report is Russian media outlets denigrated Hillary, while U.S. media outlets denigrated Bernie and Trump. And it's only okay for foreign media to denigrate Trump, not Hillary.
"Putin publicly pointed to the Panama Papers disclosure and the Olympic doping scandal as US-directed efforts to defame Russia, suggesting he sought to use disclosures to discredit the image of the United States and cast it as hypocritical."
HE IS RIGHT, IT WAS!!!
Do I doubt Russia has hacked U.S. systems. Not one bit. Every government is doing it. Though few at the level the U.S. is. We've conducted more hacking and election affecting than every other country in the world has combined. So threatening military action and retaliation is not only hypocritical, it's ludicrously insane.
Gee, so per the document Russia has had agents involved in monitoring the election process since the Carter days. Of course they do. So do we. Of course they're going to want to have insight into who will be the head of their largest rival. Duh... nothing to see here, go home.
"Russia Times aired a documentary about the Occupy Wall Street movement on 1, 2, and 4 November. RT framed the movement as a fight against "the ruling class" and described the current US political system as corrupt and dominated by corporations."
Um, ya...seems like the truth to me.
So far as I read this, it pretty much appears to be 25 pages going thru decades of Russia and U.S. opposing opinions and expressions. Well duh...we did have a cold war. And even after it's pretty much been lukewarm. So none of this crap is evidence for U.S. claims being made against Russia currently.
At
Not even the same price, just $5-$10 more. The problem is, the 3D versions never get that big discount or cheap releases. Where as most films that have been out for a couple of years unless they're major blockbusters, can be picked up for $7-$15. But they still want $35-$45 for the 3D version.
The TV's weren't that expensive once the passive models came into existence. But content...
First, there were few 3D channels available, and they were put into top tier premium packages. Rather than a simple add on $15/month for all 3D channels.
Second, 3D Blu-ray pricing is whacked. They essentially price 3D Blu-ray $5-$15 above the MSRP price of the standard Blu-Ray. But blu-rays rarely sell at MSRP, and with deals, promo editions, often sale far less. So I'd see a Blu-ray, it's MSRP price would be $35. The 3D bundle would be $45.
Except, you'd find that standard Blu-ray for $19.99. And on sale for $14.99. But the 3Ds were rarely discounted similarly, except for some occasional Black Friday deals. So the end result is you want the film on 3D. But when the difference between the standard Blu-ray and the 3D Blu-ray is $15 vs $35, it's nigh impossible to justify buying it. And often, the end result was I didn't buy either version. I almost exclusively buy 3D versions.
But many movies are far superior in 3D. Especially sci-fi space films.
It seems like ALL these projects are killed off before they're ever even really released to the market. Or hey, we released a phone and we have two basic modules (extended battery and IR remote) with more to come, someday...okay....never.
But darn it, I am TIRED of thin phones with small batteries. Give me a module phone system where I can stick a battery module that will last 2+ days of use rather than a few hours. Give me a module that lets me output 5.1 surround sound. Module for RAID5 SD card storage. Module for printing.
Truthfully, what we really need is an interconnect specification. For example, said spec could allow DSLR manufacturers to simply make the lens and sensor body. Storage, screen, and all that would connect via the interconnect specification.
Essentially, we'd reach the point where we have Personal Processing Devices. You no longer have desktops or laptops. You have your PPD, connect to a dock and have keyboard, screen, additional storage. Add a wireless module. We'll get there...eventually. But just like smartphones and electric cars, it's going to take an innovator to put it together correctly to make it take off.
And their starting this whole "slimmer = better" race.
1. Slimmer phones are harder to hold, and almost impossible to hold with your shoulder when you just need both hands for a moment.
2. Slimmer phones have smaller batteries and less battery life.
3. Slimmer phones push phone makers to go with fixed batteries and to remove SD slots.
***
What I want....
A thicker phone...with a large removable battery. And if you really want to make me happy, give me three mico-SD card slots and a RAID option. And guess what, thicker phones don't bend a.k.a. iPhone 6 Plus and are less likely to go up in smoke like the Note 7.
"deploying malicious software which is not available in the public domain"
What the heck does that mean? Does this mean the hacking tools don't have a GPL or similar license that grants free use? Or not commonly used by hackers? If these tools have been deployed to machines, I am sure someone has picked them up and modified them. It's like the "I Love You" worm. It was quickly modified by many.
But how many individuals has our government hacked, listened in on, and killed?
You know, the same guy who adamantly testified to both America and Congress that the NSA was not violating the Constitution and spying on millions of Americans.
We believe you dude.....
"Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of Investigation are releasing declassified technical information on Russian civilian and military intelligence service cyber activity"
I wager it'll show that two Russians engaged in criminal activities of identity theft and credit card fraud. But with little tie to the Russian government. And the rest will just be a flourish of high language about spear-phishing attacks. And zero evidence will actually be provided.
When was our country attacked?
The DNC is far from my country. The so-called attack, merely showed that Hillary and the DNC was engaged in election rigging (attacking our country).
This administration has provided zero proof of Russia's involvement nor motive.
The only proof we have is that Hillary, exclaimed this was in retaliation to her mucking about in Russia's election. *facepalm* So let's say ALL of this is true. That means this was retaliation on U.S. for interfering in their election.
WE'RE THE BIGGEST DAMN HYPOCRITES IN THE WORLD!
I am sorry that you think free trade with nations that use slavery and abusive actions is how capitalism should be conducted. Sorry, you're wrong.
We should ONLY have FREE TRADE with nations that ensure a similar reasonable level of protections for their citizens.
The Arctic ice is melting, the Antarctic ice is growing.
Okay, let's say we have a metal pole, with a top and bottom. It is warmed by a heat source. If the heat source is centrally located, the center will be warm and the ends equally cool.
However, if that heat source is elevated, the upper half of the metal pole will be warmer, and the bottom half cooler. The top of the pole will be significantly warmer than the bottom of the pole.
Presently, our sun has a HUGE hole in the northern hemisphere. "The low density of coronal holes is also responsible for high-speed solar winds. These streams of solar particles blow off the coronal holes about three times faster than they do in higher-density areas of the sun, according to the statement."
http://www.space.com/33047-nas...
Why is this significant? Well, we know sunspots correlate to climate temperatures. Less sun spots equal colder periods, more sunspots, correlate to warmer periods.
"Ituitively one may assume the that total solar irradiance would decrease as the number of (optically dark) sunspots increased. However direct satellite measurements of irradiance have shown just the opposite to be the case. This means that more sunspots deliver more energy to the atmosphere, so that global temperatures should rise. "
http://www-das.uwyo.edu/~geert...
Okay, so we have a large hole. The hole likely affects the suns gravitational / magnetic forces adjusting the amount of thermal energy released. If so we likely have a thermal gradient in which the higher north you go on the solar plane, the warmer it is. This would explain why the Arctic would be melting and the Antarctic adding ice.
Well, considering the Republicans now have or will have control of the:
- President
- House
- Senate
- Supreme Court
- State Governorships