What if my application already does different things depending on whether the service is misconfigured (DNS error) or just not responding (connection refused)? The Verisign move has merged different failures into one.
They can't. DNS is a delegated system. When you resolve www.somedomain.com, your DNS resolver queries the server authoritative for.com, which hands out the adress(es) of the servers authoritative for somedomain.com. Your resolver then queries that server for www.somedomain.com. Verisign's serves the.com zone, so it only sees a query for somedomain.com.
Exactly, please explain when and where did Verisign obtain the informed consent of the entities that are delegated within the.com and.net zones, which are all the.com and.net domains. I own several, I don't remember consenting, much less being informed.
Yeah! And since justice needs to scale, thieves and robbers will not only be executed, but so will their next of kin. Rapists and murderers will see their hometown blown to ashes (the Israelis can provide insights on how to do this).
haha, like msn.com is the only web site in the world that doesn't work with lynx... gimme a break, the reality is noone gives a flying fuck about the handful of retards who still use Lynx.
That's not a fair comparison because MSN dialup users pay for the service, there is a binding contract where MSN agrees to provide Internet access to the customer.
What's an "archive manager"? My Mac came with Stuffit, zip/unzip, tar (with z option). Seems to manage all the archives I come across. It even has "ar", now if that isn't an archive manager...
Oh that is just so professionnal, DoSing someone you don't like. Just like some fucking unhappy teenager. Not necessarily the best advice for a business, you moron.
thing my websites aren't that visible as hack targets.
That's totally irrelevant. Targets are identified by scanning zillions of IP. Whether you're NASA or the Wallace and Grommit Fan Club Web Site doesn't make an ounce of different.
yadda yadda yadda... use the source, Luke. This is so lame. Wonderful, the world of distros and apt-foo has created a generation of incompetent admins who only know how to install packages. Sheesh. Download OpenSSH, sh configure, make, make install and you're done. Relying on vendor packages is fine. Relying exclusively on vendor packages is lazy and dangerous.
What argument? That PGP should be made illegal so that terrorists can't use it? That's what I was replying to. What you're saying is exactly what I said: it's too late. Strong crypto exists, and terrorists will use it if they need to, whether it's legal in the US or not. It looks like you are capable to use an insulting tone to attempt to enforce your opinion, but can't yet quite grasp irony.
it isn't bundled with Windows, but it turns out that it's actually possible to install third party software. See http://www.cygwin.com.
A Microsoft representative says this bug will be adressed in the next version of Windows, code named WA (Windows Alone).
This solution would have been just fine by the court, but Yahoo decided it was easier/better to just ban the objects. The French court _never_ ordered the ban, it ordered that nazi objects not be visible by French visitors.
but Yahoo! was NOT FORCED to remove NAZI stuff from US sites, THEY MADE THE CHOICE to for fear of offending all those CONSUMERS in France.
that's not quite true, they made this choice because they found it easier than blocking French users from accessing those objects' pages. _That_ is what the court order was, it wasn't to remove the objects from sale. Yahoo acted that way not because they care a bit about any offence to the French user base, they did it to comply with the court order so they could continue to make profit from the french visitors.
For instance 15 years ago, schools in France used a French Basic, that was really hilarious to use. Anybody care to remember how this beast was called ?
Slashdot Mirror
What if my application already does different things depending on whether the service is misconfigured (DNS error) or just not responding (connection refused)? The Verisign move has merged different failures into one.
You can do this today with SubEthaEdit (used to be called Hydra).
They can't. DNS is a delegated system. When you resolve www.somedomain.com, your DNS resolver queries the server authoritative for .com, which hands out the adress(es) of the servers authoritative for somedomain.com. Your resolver then queries that server for www.somedomain.com. Verisign's serves the .com zone, so it only sees a query for somedomain.com.
Exactly, please explain when and where did Verisign obtain the informed consent of the entities that are delegated within the .com and .net zones, which are all the .com and .net domains. I own several, I don't remember consenting, much less being informed.
Yeah! And since justice needs to scale, thieves and robbers will not only be executed, but so will their next of kin. Rapists and murderers will see their hometown blown to ashes (the Israelis can provide insights on how to do this).
haha, like msn.com is the only web site in the world that doesn't work with lynx... gimme a break, the reality is noone gives a flying fuck about the handful of retards who still use Lynx.
I think I'd pay extra to read Slashdot with all the analogies filtered out.
yeah, and then we could have one unified/open/interconnected network for email. Oh, wait...
That's not a fair comparison because MSN dialup users pay for the service, there is a binding contract where MSN agrees to provide Internet access to the customer.
What's an "archive manager"? My Mac came with Stuffit, zip/unzip, tar (with z option). Seems to manage all the archives I come across. It even has "ar", now if that isn't an archive manager...
Oh that is just so professionnal, DoSing someone you don't like. Just like some fucking unhappy teenager. Not necessarily the best advice for a business, you moron.
How can we trust an explanation by someone who can't spell algorithm? If you can't spell it chances are you're not familiar enough with the word.
That's totally irrelevant. Targets are identified by scanning zillions of IP. Whether you're NASA or the Wallace and Grommit Fan Club Web Site doesn't make an ounce of different.
yadda yadda yadda ... use the source, Luke. This is so lame. Wonderful, the world of distros and apt-foo has created a generation of incompetent admins who only know how to install packages. Sheesh. Download OpenSSH, sh configure, make, make install and you're done. Relying on vendor packages is fine. Relying exclusively on vendor packages is lazy and dangerous.
no, Al Gore invented email.
What argument? That PGP should be made illegal so that terrorists can't use it? That's what I was replying to. What you're saying is exactly what I said: it's too late. Strong crypto exists, and terrorists will use it if they need to, whether it's legal in the US or not. It looks like you are capable to use an insulting tone to attempt to enforce your opinion, but can't yet quite grasp irony.
So the terrorists are just going to stop using PGP because it's illegal? I guess they're good boys after all, they don't do anyting unless it's legal.
Shoudn't we make airplanes illegal then?
considering the poster is in
cat /etc/httpd/logs/access* | grep default.ida | wc -l
yet another Useless Use of Cat
grep default.ida access*
If this was the case, then PHP would be released under the GPL, which isn't the case.
it isn't bundled with Windows, but it turns out that it's actually possible to install third party software. See http://www.cygwin.com.
A Microsoft representative says this bug will be adressed in the next version of Windows, code named WA (Windows Alone).
This solution would have been just fine by the court, but Yahoo decided it was easier/better to just ban the objects. The French court _never_ ordered the ban, it ordered that nazi objects not be visible by French visitors.
but Yahoo! was NOT FORCED to remove NAZI stuff from US sites, THEY MADE THE CHOICE to for fear of offending all those CONSUMERS in France.
that's not quite true, they made this choice because they found it easier than blocking French users from accessing those objects' pages. _That_ is what the court order was, it wasn't to remove the objects from sale. Yahoo acted that way not because they care a bit about any offence to the French user base, they did it to comply with the court order so they could continue to make profit from the french visitors.
For instance 15 years ago, schools in France used a French Basic, that was really hilarious to use. Anybody care to remember how this beast was called ?
LSE (Langage Symbolique d'Enseignement)