Slashdot Mirror


Message from Kabul

An open information society is inevitable. I was a little surprised last week to receive a forwarded e-mail from Junis, who lives in a small town 35 miles southwest of Kabul. This weekend, a movie theater and video store opened up again in Kabul (renting Independence Day), Afghan TV cranked up, and so did the Net. Americans understand all too well that our techno-driven culture produces wonders and dangers, but it's one of the most popular social and political forces in the world. Passion for pop culture relentlessly undermined repressive governments like Poland, East Germany and the former Soviet Union. The world, it turns out, really is porous now. Technology and information will squeeze through every closed nook and crevice. The Taliban never made a dent in the attachment this Afghan programmer and his friends had for it.

When his message came, the Taliban had just fled, Northern Alliance soldiers had taken over his village, and everybody rushed to barbers to cut off their beards and to nearby holes and hiding spots to dig up their Walkmen, VCRs, TVs, CD players, and -- in Junis's case -- his ancient Commodore, one of four in the village. Cafes had popped up all over, with impromptu dances and parties everywhere.

Junis's e-mail -- routed to Kabul, then Islamabad, then London -- was a reminder that there are civil liberties, and then there are civil liberties. Computers had been banned under penalty of death by the Taliban (except for the Taliban themselves), along with music and TV. Junis, a computer geek obsessed with Linux, had first e-mailed me years ago while I was writing for Hotwired. He was genial and obsessed with American culture. He loved martial arts movies, anything to do with Star Wars, and rap. He was perhaps the Taliban's prime kind of target. (Now he's furiously trying to download movies he's missed and is mesmerized by open source and Slashdot.)

"I could still see the dust of the pick-up trucks carrying the Taliban out of my village," he wrote, "and some friends and I went and dug up the boards of a chicken coop where I had hid the computer. They might have beaten or killed us if they'd found it. It was forbidden, although they used computers all of the time." He claims American commandos are skulking around dressed as Northern Alliance tribesmen.

Junis describes life under the Taliban as brutal, terrifying and profoundly boring. What the people in his town -- especially the kids -- missed most was music, posters of Indian and American movie stars (he'd kept his own decaying poster of Madonna), and American TV. Junis missed the fast-changing Web and sees, he says, that he has fallen "forever behind," and that programming is more complex than ever. But at least "Baywatch," which everyone in his town acutely missed, is back, and there's already a lot of talk about "Survivor." Junis predicts "Temptation Island" will be the number one show in Afghanistan within a month.

If the world needed another demonstration of America's most powerful weapon -- not bombs or special forces but pop culture -- it got it again this week. People all over the planet fuss about whether this healthy and democratic or corrupting and dehumanizing, but people's love for American techno-toys, TV shows, music and movies is breathaking. Watching TV pictures of tribesman on horseback, it's easy to forget that technology reached deep into this culture as well. Junis says phone service around Kabul remains spotty, but reporters, U.N. workers and foreign soldiers are wiring up. He's already made his way to some sex sites, and wishes he had a printer.

There are many computers in Afghanistan, Junis said, many in clusters in cities like Kabul and Kandahar (news reports have frequently mentioned that Bin-Laden's organization used both e-mail and encrypted files to communicate). Computer geeks are already hooking up with one another all over the country; Junis isn't the only Afghan e-mailing these days. He says other coders and gamers hid their PC's as well. Meanwhile, he's especially eager to get his hands on the Apple iPod, and has been drooling over the Apple website site since he got back online. And some things, of course, never change. "I thought they were going to get Microsoft," he wrote. "I guess not."

A decade ago, when East Berlin teenagers stormed the Wall and crossed over into West Berlin, the first thing many of them did was rush to music stores to buy tapes and CD's they'd been secretly, illegally listening to for years.

The Taliban worked to create the antithesis of the American world, one without technology, computing, the Net, music, or any vestige of popular culture (not to mention women's rights, elections, a free press or any religion except fundamentalist Islam. Junis said people in his town risked their lives repeatedly, not to fight the Taliban, but to try and listen to CD's and watch videos smuggled in from Pakistan, watched in the dark under blankets and in cellars. It seems the outcome was inevitable.

776 comments

  1. Technology... by nll8802 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Technology is part of evolution. You cannot stop, confine, or reverse technology. This is something the taliban has no chance of doing.

    1. Re:Technology... by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      Technology is part of evolution. You cannot stop, confine, or reverse technology. This is something the taliban has no chance of doing.

      But not for lack of trying. Native Americans often tried to stop technology from changing their lives, but they have failed. The Taliban was thouroughly totalitarian, and look at what people do the moment they turn their backs.

      Quoth Technology to the Taliban:

      All your people are belong to us!

    2. Re:Technology... by Kinson+Ravenlock · · Score: 0

      Technology will alaways undermine repressive governments...

    3. Re:Technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF ISP is he using? Afghanistan Online?

    4. Re:Technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chances are likely, with an old Commodore, that he's dialing up to a UNIX based BBS of some sort over a max 9600 baud terminal connection (based on the story's reports of 'spotty' phone service).

      Remember - this email was 'routed' through Kabul, then Islamabad, then London. Dialing up to Islamabad, Pakistan probably wouldn't be so tough - hell, who's going to charge you long distance? The Taliban?!

    5. Re:Technology... by Scroppo · · Score: 1

      Maybe through the Public Opinion Office at CIA's heardquaters? Looks like a fake, a lite one though, VCR-s and TV-s dug-up? It looks pretty wild is it not? BBS-s on prehistoric telephone lines? How romantic:) And by the way, Didn't Mr. JonKatz accidently misplaced American subculture with a culture? I believe not. You better believe this message. Uncle Sam is in deep need of you.

    6. Re:Technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Douglas Adams
      Young Zaphod Plays it Safe
      A large flying craft moved swiftly across the surface of an astoundingly
      beautiful sea. From mid-morning onward it plied back and forth in great widening
      arcs, and at last attracted the attention of the local islanders, a peaceful,
      sea-food-loving people who gathered on the beach and squinted up into the
      blinding sun, trying to see what was there.
      Any sophisticated knowledgeable person who had knocked about, seen a few things,
      would probably have remarked on how much the craft looked like a filing cabinet-
      -a large and recently burgled filing cabinet lying on its back with its drawers
      in the air and flying.
      The islanders, whose experience was of a different kind, were instead struck by
      how little it looked like a lobster.
      They chattered excitedly about its total lack of claws, its stiff unbending
      back, and the fact that it seemed to experience the greatest difficulty staying
      on the ground. This last feature seemed particularly funny to them. They jumped
      up and down on the spot a lot to demonstrate to the stupid thing that they
      themselves found staying on the ground the easiest thing in the world.
      But soon this entertainment began to pall for them. After all, since it was
      perfectly clear to them that the thing was not a lobster, and since their world
      was blessed with an abundance of things that were lobsters (a good half dozen of
      which were now marching succulently up the beach toward them), they saw no
      reason to waste any more time on the thing but decided instead to adjourn
      immediately for a late lobster lunch.
      At that exact moment the craft stopped suddenly in mid-air, then upended itself
      and plunged headlong into the ocean with a great crash of spray which sent them
      shouting into the trees.
      When they reemerged, nervously, a few minutes later, all they were able to see
      was a smoothly scarred circle of water and a few gulping bubbles.
      That's odd, they said to each other between mouthfuls of the best lobster to be
      had anywhere in the Western Galaxy, that's the second time that's happened in a
      year.
      The craft which wasn't a lobster dived direct to a depth of two hundred feet,
      and hung there in the heavy blueness, while vast masses of water swayed about
      it. High above, where the water was magically clear, a brilliant formation of
      fish flashed away. Below, where the light had difficulty reaching, the color of
      the water sank to a dark and savage blue.
      Here, at two hundred feet, the sun streamed feebly. A large, silk-skinned sea-
      mammal rolled idly by, inspecting the craft with a kind of half interest, as if
      it had half expected to find something of this kind around about here, and then
      it slid on up and away toward the rippling light.
      The craft waited for a minute or two, taking readings, and then descended
      another hundred feet. At this depth it was becoming seriously dark. After a
      moment or two the internal lights of the craft shut down, and in the second or
      so that passed before the main external beams suddenly stabbed out, the only
      visible light came from a small hazily illuminated pink sign which read The
      Beeblebrox Salvage and Really Wild Stuff Corporation.
      The huge beams switched downward, catching a vast shoal of silver fish, which
      swiveled away in silent panic.
      In the dim control room, which extended in a broad bow from the craft's blunt
      prow, four heads were gathered around a computer display that was analyzing the
      very, very faint and intermittent signals that emanated from deep on the sea
      bed.
      "That's it," said the owner of one of the heads finally.
      "Can we be quite sure?" said the owner of another of the heads.
      "One hundred percent positive," replied the owner of the first head.
      "You're one hundred percent positive that the ship which is crashed on the
      bottom of this ocean is the ship which you said you were one hundred percent
      positive could one hundred percent positively never crash?" said the owner of
      the two remaining heads. "Hey," he put up two of his hands, "I'm only asking."
      The two officials from the Safety and Civil Reassurance Administration responded
      to this with a very cold stare, but the man with the odd, or rather the even,
      number of heads missed it. He flung himself back on the pilot couch, opened a couple of beers-one for himself and the other also for himself-stuck his feet on
      the console and said "Hey, baby" through the ultra-glass at a passing fish.
      "Mr. Beeblebrox. . . " began the shorter and less reassuring of the two
      officials in a low voice.
      "Yup?" said Zaphod, rapping a suddenly empty can down on some of the more
      sensitive instruments. "You ready to dive? Let's go."
      "Mr. Beeblebrox, let us make one thing perfectly clear... "
      "Yeah let's," said Zaphod. "How about this for a start. Why don't you just tell
      me what's really on this ship."
      "We have told you," said the official. "By-products."
      Zaphod exchanged weary glances with himself
      "By-products," he said. "By-products of what?"
      "Processes," said the official.
      "What processes?"
      "Processes that are perfectly safe."
      "Santa Zarquana Voostra!" exclaimed both of Zaphod's heads in chorus. "So safe
      that you have to build a zarking fortress ship to take the by-products to the
      nearest black hole and tip them in! Only it doesn't get there because the pilot
      takes a detour--is this right?--to pick up some lobster... ? OK, so the guy is
      cool, but ... I mean own up, this is barking time, this is major lunch, this is
      stool approaching critical mass, this is ... this is ... total vocabulary
      failure!
      "Shut up!" his right head yelled at his left, "we're flanging!"
      He got a good calming grip on the remaining beer can.
      "Listen, guys," he resumed after a moment's peace and contemplation. The two
      officials had said nothing. Conversation at this level was not something to
      which they felt they could aspire. "I just want to know," insisted Zaphod, "what
      you're getting me into here."
      He stabbed a finger at the intermittent readings trickling over the computer
      screen. They meant nothing to him but he didn't like the look of them at all.
      They were all squiggly with lots of long numbers and things.
      "It's breaking up, is that it?" he shouted. "It's got a hold full of epsilonic
      radiating aorist rods or something that'll fry this whole space sector for
      zillions of years back and it's breaking up. Is that the story? Is that what
      we're going down to find? Am I going to come out of that wreck with even more
      heads?"
      "It cannot possibly be a wreck, Mr. Beeblebrox," insisted the official, "the
      ship is guaranteed to be perfectly safe. It cannot possibly break up."
      "Then why are you so keen to go and look at it?"
      "We like to look at things that are perfectly safe."
      "Freeeooow!"
      "Mr. Beeblebrox," said the official, patiently, "may I remind you that you have
      a job to do?"
      "Yeah, well, maybe I don't feel so keen on doing it all of a sudden. What do you
      think I am, completely without any moral whatsits, what are they called, those
      moral things?"
      "Scruples?"
      "Scruples, thank you, whatsoever? Well?"
      The two officials waited calmly. They coughed slightly to help pass the time.
      Zaphod sighed a "what is the world coming to" sort of sigh to absolve himself
      from all blame, and swung himself around in his seat.
      "Ship?" he called.
      "Yup?" said the ship.
      "Do what I do."
      The ship thought about this for a few milliseconds and then, after double
      checking all the seals on its heavy duty bulkheads, it began slowly, inexorably,
      in the hazy blaze of its lights, to sink to the lowest depths.
      Five hundred feet.
      A thousand.
      Two thousand.
      Here, at a pressure of nearly seventy atmospheres, in the chilling depths where
      no light reaches, nature keeps its most heated imaginings. Two footlong
      nightmares loomed wildly into the bleaching light, yawned, and vanished back
      into the blackness.
      Two and a half thousand feet.
      At the dim edges of the ship's lights guilty secrets flitted by with their eyes
      on stalks.
      Gradually the topography of the distantly approaching ocean bed resolved with
      greater and greater clarity on the computer displays until at last a shape could
      be made out that was separate and distinct from its surroundings. It was like a
      huge lopsided cylindrical fortress that widened sharply halfway along its length
      to accommodate the heavy ultraplating with which the crucial storage holds were
      clad, and which were supposed by its builders to have made this the most secure
      and impregnable spaceship ever built. Before launch the material structure of
      this section had been battered, rammed, blasted and subjected to every assault
      its builders knew it could withstand in order to demonstrate that it could
      withstand them.
      The tense silence in the cockpit tightened perceptibly as it became clear that
      it was this section that had broken rather neatly in two.
      "In fact it's perfectly safe," said one of the officials, "It's built so that
      even if the ship does break up, the storage holds cannot possibly be breached."
      Three thousand, eight hundred and twenty-five feet.
      Four Hi-Presh-A Smart Suits moved slowly out of the open hatchway of the salvage
      craft and waded through the barrage of its lights toward the monstrous shape
      that loomed darkly out of the sea night. They moved with a sort of clumsy grace,
      near weightlessness though weighed on by a world of water.
      With his right-hand head Zaphod peered up into the black immensities above him
      and for a moment his mind sang with a silent roar of horror. He glanced to his
      left and was relieved to see that his other head was busy watching the Brockian Ultra-Cricket broadcasts on the helmet vid without concern. Slightly behind him
      to his left walked the two officials from the Safety and Civil Reassurance
      Administration, slightly in front of him to his right walked the empty suit,
      carrying their implements and testing the way for them.
      They passed the huge rift in the broken backed Starship Billion Year Bunker, and
      played their flashlights up into it. Mangled machinery loomed between torn and
      twisted bulkheads, two feet thick. A family of large transparent eels lived in there now and seemed to like it.
      The empty suit preceded them along the length of the ship's gigantic murky hull,
      trying the airlocks. The third one it tested ground open uneasily. They crowded
      inside it and waited for several long minutes while the pump mechanisms dealt
      with the hideous pressure that the ocean exerted, and slowly replaced it with an
      equally hideous pressure of air and inert gases. At last the inner door slid
      open and they were admitted to a dark outer holding area of the Starship Billion Year Bunker.
      Several more high security Titan-O-Hold doors had to be passed through, each of
      which the officials opened with a selection of quark keys. Soon they were so
      deep within the heavy security fields that the UltraCricket broadcasts were beginning to fade, and Zaphod had to switch to one of the rock video stations,
      since there was nowhere that they were not able to reach.
      A final doorway slid open, and they emerged into a large sepulchral space.
      Zaphod played his flashlight against the opposite wall and it fell full on a
      wild-eyed screaming face.
      Zaphod screamed a diminished fifth himself, dropped his light and sat heavily on
      the floor, or rather on a body which had been lying there undisturbed for around
      six months and which reacted to being sat on by exploding with great violence. Zaphod wondered what to do about all this, and after a brief but hectic internal
      debate decided that passing out would be the very thing.
      He came to a few minutes later and pretended not to know who he was, where he
      was or how he had got there, but was not able to convince anybody. He then
      pretended that his memory suddenly returned with a rush and that the shock caused him to pass out again, but he was helped unwillingly to his feet by the
      empty suit--which he was beginning to take a serious dislike to--and forced to
      come to terms with his surroundings.
      They were dimly and fitfully lit and unpleasant in a number of respects, the
      most obvious of which was the colorful arrangement of parts of the ship's late
      lamented Navigation Officer over the floor, walls and ceiling, and especially
      over the lower half of his, Zaphod's, suit. The effect of this was so
      astoundingly nasty that we shall not be referring to it again at any point in
      this narrative--other than to record briefly the fact that it caused Zaphod to
      throw up inside his suit, which he therefore removed and swapped, after suitable
      headgear modifications, with the empty one. Unfortunately the stench of the
      fetid air in the ship, followed by the sight of his own suit walking around
      casually draped in rotting intestines was enough to make him throw up in the
      other suit as well, which was a problem that he and the suit would simply have
      to live with.
      There. All done. No more nastiness.
      At least, no more of that particular nastiness.
      The owner of the screaming face had calmed down very slightly now and was
      babbling away incoherently in a large tank of yellow liquid-an emergency
      suspension tank.
      "It was crazy," he babbled, "crazy! I told him we could always try the lobster
      on the way back, but he was crazy. Obsessed! Do you ever get like that about
      lobster? Because I don't. Seems to me it's all rubbery and fiddly to eat, and
      not that much taste, well I mean is there? I infinitely prefer scallops, and
      said so. Oh Zarquon, I said so!"
      Zaphod stared at this extraordinary apparition, flailing in its tank. The man
      was attached to all kinds of life-support tubes, and his voice was bubbling out
      of speakers that echoed insanely around the ship, returning as haunting echoes
      from deep and distant corridors.
      "That was where I went wrong," the madman yelled, A actually said that I
      preferred scallops and he said it was because I hadn't had real lobster like
      they did where his ancestors came from, which was here, and he'd prove it. He
      said it was no problem, he said the lobster here was worth a whole journey, let
      alone the small diversion it would take to get here, and he swore he could
      handle the ship in the atmosphere, but it was madness, madness!" he screamed,
      and paused with his eyes rolling, as if the word had rung some kind of bell in
      his mind. "The ship went right out of control! I couldn't believe what we were
      doing and just to prove a point about lobster which is really so overrated as a
      food, I'm sorry to go on about lobsters so much, I'll try and stop In a minute,
      but they've been on my mind so much for the months I've been in this tank, can
      you imagine what it's like to be stuck in a ship with the same guys for months
      eating junk food when all one guy will talk about is lobster and then spend six
      months floating by yourself in a tank thinking about it. I promise I will try
      and shut up about the lobsters, I really will. Lobsters, lobsters, lobsters-
      enough! I think I'm the only survivor. I'm the only one who managed to get to an
      emergency tank before we went down. I sent out the Mayday and then we hit. It's
      a disaster, isn't it? A total disaster, and all because the guy liked lobsters.
      How much sense am I making? It's really hard for me to tell."
      He gazed at them beseechingly, and his mind seemed to sway slowly back down to
      earth like a falling leaf. He blinked and looked at them oddly like a monkey
      peering at a strange fish. He scrabbled curiously with his wrinkled up fingers
      at the glass side of the tank. Tiny, thick yellow bubbles loosed themselves from
      his mouth and nose, caught briefly in his swab of hair and strayed on upward.
      "Oh Zarquon, oh heavens," he mumbled pathetically to himself, "I've been found.
      I've been rescued. . . . "
      "Well," said one of the officials, briskly, "you've been found at least." He
      strode over to the main computer bank in the middle of the chamber and started
      checking quickly through the ship's main monitor circuits for damage reports.
      "The aorist rod chambers are intact," he said.
      "Holy dingo's dos," snarled Zaphod, "there are aorist rods on board.
      Aorist rods were devices used in a now happily abandoned form of energy
      production. When the hunt for new sources of energy had at one point got
      particularly frantic, one bright young chap suddenly spotted that one place
      which had never used up all its available energy-the past. And with the sudden
      rush of blood to the head that such insights tend to induce, he invented a way
      of mining it that very same night, and within a year huge tracts of the past
      were being drained of all their energy and simply wasting away. Those who
      claimed that the past should be left unspoiled were accused of indulging in an
      extremely expensive form of sentimentality. The past provided a very cheap,
      plentiful and clean source of energy, there could always be a few Natural Past
      Reserves set up if anyone wanted to pay for their upkeep, and as for the claim
      that draining the past impoverished the present, well, maybe it did, slightly,
      but the effects were immeasurable and you really had to keep a sense of
      proportion.
      It was only when it was realized that the present really was being impoverished,
      and that the reason for
      it was that those selfish plundering wastrel bastards up in the future were
      doing exactly the same thing, that everyone realized that every single aorist
      rod, and the terrible secret of how they were made, would have to be utterly and
      forever destroyed. They claimed it was for the sake of their grandparents and
      grandchildren, but it was of course for the sake of their grandparent's
      grandchildren, and their grandchildren's grandparents.
      The official from the Safety and Civil Reassurance Administration gave a
      dismissive shrug.
      "They're perfectly safe," he said. He glanced up at Zaphod and suddenly said
      with uncharacteristic frankness, "There's worse than that on board. At least,"
      he added, tapping at one of the computer screens, "I hope it's on board."
      The other official rounded on him sharply.
      "What the hell do you think you're saying?" he snapped.
      The first shrugged again. He said, "It doesn't matter. He can say what he likes.
      No one would believe him. It's why we chose to use him rather than do anything
      official, isn't it? The more wild the story he tells, the more it'll sound like
      he's some hippy adventurer making it up. He can even say that we said this and
      it'll make him sound like a paranoid." He smiled pleasantly at Zaphod who was
      seething in his nasty suit. "You may accompany us," he told him, "if you wish."
      "You see?" said the official, examining the ultra-titanium outer seals of the
      aorist rod hold. "Perfectly secure, perfectly safe."
      He said the same thing as they passed holds containing chemical weapons so
      powerful that a teaspoonful could fatally infect an entire planet.
      He said the same thing as they passed holds containing zeta-active compounds so
      powerful that a teaspoonful could blow up a whole planet.
      He said the same thing as they passed holds containing theta-active compounds so
      powerful that a teaspoonful could irradiate a whole planet.
      "I'm glad I'm not a planet," muttered Zaphod.
      "You'd have nothing to fear," assured the official from the Safety and Civil
      Reassurance Administration, "planets are very safe. Provided," he added-and
      paused. They were approaching the hold nearest to the point where the back of
      the Starship Billion Year Bunker was broken. The corridor here was twisted and
      deformed, and the floor was damp and sticky in patches.
      "Ho hum," he said, "ho very much hum."
      "What's in this hold?" demanded Zaphod.
      "By-products," said the official, clamming up again.
      "By-products. . . " insisted Zaphod, quietly, "of what?"
      Neither official answered. Instead, they examined the hold door very carefully
      and saw that its seals were twisted apart by the forces that had deformed the
      whole corridor. One of them touched the door lightly. It swung open to his
      touch. There was darkness inside, with just a couple of dim yellow lights deep
      within it.
      "Of what?'' hissed Zaphod.
      The leading official turned to the other.
      "There's an escape capsule," he said, "that the crew were to use to abandon ship
      before jettisoning it into the black hole," he said. "I think it would be good
      to know that it's still there." The other official nodded and left without a
      word.
      The first official quietly beckoned Zaphod in. The large dim yellow lights
      glowed about twenty feet from them.
      "The reason," he said, quietly, "why everything else in this ship is, I
      maintain, safe, is that no one is really crazy enough to use them. No one. At
      least no one that crazy would ever get near them. Anyone that mad or dangerous
      rings very deep alarm bells. People may be stupid but they're not that stupid."
      "By-products," hissed Zaphod again, he had to hiss in order that his voice
      shouldn't be heard to tremble, "of what."
      "Er, Designer People."
      "What?''
      "The Sirius Cybernetics Corporation was awarded a huge research grant to design
      and produce synthetic personalities to order. The results were uniformly
      disastrous. All the 'people' and 'personalities' turned out to be amalgams of characteristics that simply could not co-exist in naturally occurring life
      forms. Most of them were just poor pathetic misfits, but some were deeply,
      deeply dangerous. Dangerous because they didn't ring alarm bells in other
      people. They could walk through situations the way that ghosts walk through
      walls, because no one spotted the danger.
      "The most dangerous of all were three identical ones-they were put in this hold,
      to be blasted, with this ship, right out of this universe. They are not evil, in
      fact they are rather simple and charming. But they are the most dangerous
      creatures that ever lived because there is nothing they will not do if allowed,
      and nothing they will not be allowed to do...."
      Zaphod looked at the dim yellow lights, the two dim yellow lights. As his eyes
      became accustomed to the light he saw that the two lights framed a third space
      where something was broken. Wet sticky patches gleamed dully on the floor.
      Zaphod and the official walked cautiously toward the lights. At that moment,
      four words came crashing into the helmet headsets from the other official.
      "The capsule is gone," he said tersely.
      "Trace it," snapped Zaphod's companion. "Find exactly where it has gone. We must
      know where it has gone!"
      Zaphod slid aside a large ground-glass door. Beyond it lay a tank full of thick
      yellow liquid, and floating in it was a man, a kindly looking man with lots of
      pleasant laugh lines around his face. He seemed to be floating quite contentedly
      and smiling to himself.
      Another terse message suddenly came through his helmet headset. The planet
      toward which the escape capsule had headed had already been identified. It was
      in Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha.
      The kindly looking man in the tank seemed to be babbling gently to himself, just
      as the co-pilot had been in his tank. Little yellow bubbles beaded on the man's
      lips. Zaphod found a small speaker by the tank and turned it on. He heard the man babbling gently about a shining city on a hill.
      He also heard the official from the Safety and Civil Reassurance Administration
      issue instructions that the planet in ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha must be made "perfectly
      safe."

      no copyright 2001 textz.com - no rights reserved

    7. Re:Technology... by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

      I'd suspect that the American Aboriginal folk probably where not so much interested in stopping technology , but rather managing it's effects to avoid detremental consequence to the culture and economic structures that supported the culture. There is a difference

      The reason I say this, is that this is that in my (Australian) country , many of the more traditional language group indiginous groups have taken to *certain* technologies with glee (such as video conferencing!) while keeping cautious of ones that have the potential danger tech.

      The key is managing with a healthy sense of sceptisism, as opposed to luditism

      The talisban of course are just plain goons.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  2. Hmm, sounds odd... by Quasar1999 · · Score: 0, Troll

    sounds odd that for such oppressed people, this guy could get at a computer so fast... Sounds like this oppression view thing is a little one sided... Was the taliban really that oppressive? or are the western media outlets just trying to make them look just that little bit more evil?

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2

      RTFP (Read The F***ing Post). He dug it up from a hiding spot underneath the chicken coop. Stop trolling, it's not amusing.

    2. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by The+Smith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They certainly were that repressive. But think about how Americans would react if a fundamentalist government seized power, banning computers, music and TV. Surely there would be a mass hiding of equipment against the day when the government fell.

      I must say though, it makes me feel a little sick that the first thing the Afghans will see when they brush the soil from the TVs will be Jerry Springer, Temptation Island and MTV...

    3. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by rnb · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Make no mistake, the Taliban is a really vile group of people who are as bad as they are made out to be. But also don't make the mistake of thinking that the U.S. government would have cared about them, their treatment of their citizens or Afghanistan in general if it weren't for 9/11.

    4. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Quasar1999 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Perhaps if you actually read my post, you would realise that I am suggesting that the taliban were not as oppressive as is suggested in this post. If they were as oppressive, then even after they left, people would just all of a sudden start listening to music, going to theaters, and surfing the web... if they were as oppressive as the western media says, they would have systematically destroyed radios, theaters, computers, and any other infrastructure they felt was 'western'... they didn't... hell this guy got away with hiding a computer under his chickedn coop... This article is very one sided, and lacks facts to back it up.

      I did read the article, and thats why I find it odd that people could simply hide technology under the noses of the taliban so easily if they were sooo oppressive...

      Next time, instead of telling me to RTFP, why don't you read the post you are replying to first, and take the time to attempt to comprehend what you read... you may not agree with what I have to say, but don't accuse me of not reading the article...

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    5. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      But think about how Americans would react if a fundamentalist government seized power, banning computers, music and TV. Surely there would be a mass hiding of equipment against the day when the government fell.


      Nope, there would be a mass march of gun owners on Washington, loaded and ready.

      This will never happen, though, because only the Amish and Luddite freaks don't see the value of technology. Even the most rigid fundies still want to be able to proselytize via the net.

    6. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nope, there would be a mass march of gun owners on Washington, loaded and ready.

      It seems you've lost a lot of freedom recently - I haven't seen anyone march. Besides do you seriously believe a group of disorganized people with handguns an rifles is actually a match for the US army - one of the most modern and best trained armies in the world? Didn't work terribly well for the Taliban just now, did it?

    7. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Ledge · · Score: 1

      But it has worked many times over throughout history. My fear leading in to the current war was that this would be the case. I was worried that the US was liberating people who didn't want to be liberated.

      --
      If it ain't a Model M, it's a piece of crap.
    8. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, and i didn't think that a bunch of farmers could beat the british army in the 1700s either, but i was apparently wrong.

    9. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      1) The Taliban are ignorant and like it that way. They didn't want to know about the US Army because to push around women and children and keep control of one of the poorest countries in the world, they didn't need to. We hit them by surprise as much as anything else.

      2) Some of these gun owners are veterans that have HAD the training of the US Army and know everything there is to know about the equipment, including its strengths, weaknesses, and how to sneak into the armory at Fort Whatever.

      3) We haven't lost as much freedom as it seems. Basically, only people who were doing shady things to begin with lost freedom. I'm not a criminal so I don't give a shit if they have the right to wiretap all my phones - I'll never give them a reason to, and I know enough cops to know that they won't expend the energy without a good reason. My government doesn't care about me, which in this case is good.

    10. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hate to break it to you, but just such a government is trying to seize power and ban computers, music, and TV - at least, when used to express anything they disagree with (which is most of the time) or when their sponsors haven't been paid off to their satisfaction. Fortunately, they haven't been able to get their act completely together yet, and some in the government remain dedicated to to principles on which America was founded.

    11. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Peter+Dyck · · Score: 1
      Not lost freedom?

      New wiretapping laws, around 1000 people locked up with no right to habeas corpus and more to come. Straight from your Orwellian office of "Homeland Security"...

    12. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      The threat of the 2nd Amendment to usurping politicians has always been much more potent to make politicians nervous about assassination than to fight the US armed forces. The Interior department was so heavy handed during the Clinton administration that they were seriously talking about certain areas being quite high risk in implementing their land use directives. Suddenly, everything calmed down as soon as Bush got in but a Gore administration would have probably lost some agents if they kept going in that direction

      DB

    13. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm assuming he had a more modern computer hidded too that wasn't mentioned, since there's no way you're going to be doing anything but slow text browsing on a Commodore. Then what about the power and net access (presumably fast net access, since he was downloading movies)? I was under the impression that, with the exception of Kabul, most of Afghanistan was unwired.

    14. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by ChadAmberg · · Score: 1

      Have you ever met anyone in the US Military? You try to ban guns, the first thing they do is turn their military weapons against you. People in the military aren't the robots blindly following orders you think they are. So Sorry, Wrong Answer, spin it again Vanna!

    15. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by bribecka · · Score: 2

      did read the article, and thats why I find it odd that people could simply hide technology under the noses of the taliban so easily if they were sooo oppressive...

      Um, if the stuff is *hidden* from the Taliban, how are they supposed to just destroy it? They did destroy everything they could--just look at those 1800 year old Buddha statues they blew up in March.

      Sort of like the drug "war" in the US--according to your logic, the US government should be able to find drugs and get rid of them in a moment, even though they are right under their noses.

      --

      Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?

    16. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Gozr · · Score: 1

      Do you realize that on the first day of rifle deer season in Pennsylvania, where I live, something like the forth largest standing army in the world walks into the woods to shoot deer? There are nearly as many firarms in this country as there are people. More than a third of our population owns them. And, do you really think that the majority of the US armed services would actually fire upon there own families? There is a very good reason for the second amendment. The NRA and GOA helping politicians who realize this to stifle anti-gun laws on almost a weekly basis. Yes, we may continue to lose some of our gun rights, but there is a threshhold. For those of us who may not rise up in anarchy, we would certainly hide our guns like Junis did with his computer.

    17. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by platypus · · Score: 2

      Make no mistake, the Taliban is a really vile group of people who are as bad as they are made out to be. But also don't make the mistake of thinking that the U.S. government would have cared about them, their treatment of their citizens or Afghanistan in general if it weren't for 9/11.

      Please mod parent up. It just isn't right to rate this as flamebait.
      Don't believe me? Just take a better look at some of our allies in the war against terrorism.

    18. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by bribecka · · Score: 2

      yeah, and i didn't think that a bunch of farmers could beat the british army in the 1700s either, but i was apparently wrong.

      That's slightly different--back then, the farmers and the british had basically the same weaponry--muskets. Yeah, the british had cannons, but so did we.

      Now, a march with a bunch of people carrying rifles isn't quite a match agains F-15s, helicopter gunships, and cluster bombs.

      --

      Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?

    19. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      sounds odd to hear such an uninformed opinion... sound like this freedom of information thing is a little one sided, otherwise, you wouldn't be so ignorant. Are you really that stupid? Or is the crack you're smoking making you look just that little bit more FUCKING STUPID?

      Honestly, the celebrating that was done by the citizens of Afghanistan when the Taliban were ousted from their cities by the Northern Alliance should be enough to show they really are opressed. Are you aware that 97% of all women in Afghanistan are sexually mutilated? Are you aware that men are jailed for "crimes" as simple as shaving off their beard?

      Have you not read about the Taliban fighters who are:

      a.) Killing eachother because they would rather die than surrender to the Northern Alliance (note that the Northern Alliance has offered free and save passage _out_ of Afghanistan to non-native Taliban supporters, provided they surrender their arms... also note that they are killing *eachother* willfully - not killing themselves - that would be a "immoral".)
      b.) Forcing the citiznes of Konduz to fight on the side of the Taliban, or be beaten, or even executed.
      c.) Killing anyone who does wish to surrender to the Northern Alliance.

      If that is not oppressive, please, enlighten us all as to what is.

    20. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by namespan · · Score: 2

      only the Amish and Luddite freaks don't see the value of technology

      On the surface, I agree with your comment: there's value present in the technology that is worth appreciating, no matter what your views are.

      However, the implication that the Amish or others who choose not to adopt technology do not see the value or are freaks is offensive, dangerous, and probably flat out wrong.

      It's my understanding that the Amish are not strictly against adopting technology. But they always check what adopting it will do to their economy, community, culture, and lifestyle. Then they make a decision.
      Hence, you'll see community telephones/cellphones. It's really not all that unreasonable to note that technologies have benefits and secondary impacts (some of which are negative), and to choose acordingly. In reality, I think this is what a smart culture does.

      You could, of course, argue that this makes them like the Taliban... screening new ideas and technologies to make sure nothing they don't like gets in. I think the difference is that the Amish don't use violence as a means of enforcing the conventions of their community, nor do they use force as a means of coercing people to stay. They are free to join another community with different standards if they want.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    21. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Mitsuogs · · Score: 1

      What odd logic...
      So then I guess you can say the Nazis were misunderstood also... since there were so many Jews in Hiding ...

      If the U.S. passed a law saying the ownership of computers was punishable by death, I'd hide mine too.

      Hey, it wasn't cheap.

    22. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by vought · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit.

      We cared about them enough to impose sanctions against them nearly from day one of their rule and to condemn their destruction of antiquities.

      But I guess THINKING before you post isn't on your to-do list today, is it?

      Yes, the U.S. could be a LOT better at telling other countries to get on the ball when it comes to human rights - but I've found that the people who want us to intervene in this manner are also the same ones who scream loudest when U.S. businesses 'destroy' local customs and traditions through factory farming, factory work, etc.

      You can't have it both ways. We either interfere or don't!

    23. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Peter+Dyck · · Score: 1
      And, do you really think that the majority of the US armed services would actually fire upon there own families?

      Yes.

      What is it that makes you think that American psyche has somehow changed from the civil war or is somehow different from that of all the other people in the world who have fired upon their fellow citizens?

    24. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by rnb · · Score: 1

      But we also gave them $43 million dollars earlier this very year because they banned drugs.

      So much for sanctions/condemnation. Keep up the good work, guys.

      link

    25. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2


      You could, of course, argue that this makes them like the Taliban... screening new ideas and technologies to make sure nothing they don't like gets in. I think the difference is that the Amish don't use violence as a means of enforcing the conventions of their community, nor do they use force as a means of coercing people to stay. They are free to join another community with different standards if they want.


      That was poor wording on my part. I therefore apologize to all the Amish that are reading this :)

      The Amish also don't begrudge the rest of the world for choosing to adopt high technology. I have no quarrel with that attitude at all. I mean that the Luddite-types were the freaks, not the Amish.

      If you want to compare any american institution to the Taliban, I would point at certain Southern Baptist and Pentacostal churches, for their intolerance and shortsighted absolutist doctrines.

    26. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by gorilla · · Score: 2

      What do you mean if?

    27. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      "and I know enough cops to know that they won't expend the energy without a good reason. My government doesn't care about me, which in this case is good."

      This is really a head in the sand attitude. Most people don't need the protection of the law now because wiretaps are so expensive. They involve lots of manual labor. But what happens when someone builds a voice recognition AI that makes it cheap enough to spy on EVERYBODY? Will you still feel safe that the government doesn't care enough about you to spy on you?

    28. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by mrpotato · · Score: 1
      I must say though, it makes me feel a little sick that the first thing the Afghans will see when they brush the soil from the TVs will be Jerry Springer, Temptation Island and MTV...

      Why? Aren't you proud of your popular culture? That's what u.s. popular culture is all about. And yes, I agree with you, there is nothing about it that I would be proud of (if I was american). Please note that I said "popular" culture, so I don't include here your history or great authors you have/had. Pop culture is utter crap, and it is the greatest U.S. ambassador in the world.

      --

      cheers
    29. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by zeno_2 · · Score: 1
      I must say though, it makes me feel a little sick that the first thing the Afghans will see when they brush the soil from the TVs will be Jerry Springer, Temptation Island and MTV...

      Its probably better then watching mass death and destruction every day while hiding from the Taliban =)

    30. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      Sorry. What does voice RECOGNITION have to do with spying or making spying more popular? You still have to have a reason to target the person.

      You also have to have a human to double-check the intelligence because no self-respecting cop is going to trust a computer over his own instincts.

      They have the technology to follow me around from a satellite if they want, but why would they? They've got bigger fish to fry.

    31. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Zone5 · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... you can browse perfectly well on a Commodore. Do you think the benefits of open-source development are restricted to Linux geeks? I have a friend who to this day still uses a Commodore Amiga 1000 as his primary machine. Why? Because he can, and because he likes it. Also he's a cheap bastard, but that's beside the point - he's a geek and he's having fun. Open-source developers have made browsers and mail clients available for AmigaDOS, as well as such niceties as ICQ clients. Throw in a modem and a long-distance call to an ISP in Pakistan, and poof! He's online, regardless of conditions in Afghanistan itself.

      --
      "So on one hand, honey is an amazingly sophisticated and efficient food source. On the other hand it's bee backwash."
    32. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Argnarf · · Score: 1

      Uh.. download and play movies on a Commodore? No

    33. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      That may well be true (I'm pretty sure it is) but if you have the army on your side your own rifles seem superfluous in comparison.

    34. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by npongratz · · Score: 1

      And, do you really think that the majority of the US armed services would actually fire upon there own families?

      Most likely not. But they won't have to. NATO and UN "Peacekeeping" Forces will be more than happy to keep Swamp City (Washington DC) from "falling" to people who want nothing more than to keep the civil liberties guaranteed to them by the U.S. Constitution (and God, if you believe in Him).

      Hitler and Stalin knew best: you can't take away a person's rights without first taking away their only means of defense.

    35. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They have the technology to follow me around from a satellite if they want, but why would they? They've got bigger fish to fry.

      That's the point, with new technology they can fry all the fish. Traffic analysis, vacuum cleaner information gathering. Collect them all, and let the database sort them out.

      Here's the kind of thing that could happen: Intellegence could find out that I've gotten copies made at BestCopy in Toronto (credit card) which was connected with Bin Laden, Bonk! My security risk karma gets a +1. So more automatic tests get run. Maybe I made a phone call to the next-door neighbour of a gun-runner, Bonk! I've mentioned gun-powder on Usenet, Bonk! I associate with the notorious Keith Henson, charged with threatening $cientology with weapons of mass-distruction, Bonk! And so it goes... Wider and wider searches that find possible and maybe connections.

      The trouble with systems that collect everything is that there will be a temptation to automatically create profiles, and if it's not done right, some innocent person's security risk karma could max out -- and we're weakening the rules on innocent until proven guilty.

      Sounds it sounds paranoid, but security agencies are paranoid by nature, and have to look at possibles and maybes.

      If you want an excellent look at what a paranoid "knows everything" system would be like, the best I've read is Sam Hall by Poul Anderson. Hard to find short story, but well worth the search!

      Luckly I paid cash at BestCopy so they'll never know ... DOH!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    36. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Doomdark · · Score: 1

      ... and "Indenpendence Day". What a crappy movie. :-/

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    37. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by aka-ed · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Katz has been trolled. Or else he's trolling us. Kabul does not have electric power, let alone "Baywatch" or, god forbid, "Temptation Island."

      It's ridiculous that Katz should take this at face value, or that /. editors would pass this on without comment. The minor effort required to check even one of the outlandish "facts" in this piece would have been worth some effort.

      This is really sad. I've been after Katz to look at his journalistic basics since the day he decided that ABC TV was "wrong" when they used a hidden camera, wielded by a paid undercover operative, to show Red Lion supermarkets selling rotten meat.

      He claimed that it was "unethical" to get a job at Red Lion with a falsified job app, even if you already knew potentially lethal poison was being sold to people.

      At the time he was celebrating a decision (later overturned) that would have hog-tied such investigative practices.

      He doesn't understand the basic debt that a journalist owes his readers, and probably never will. One can only hopes that he takes this embarassment as a lesson.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    38. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Nykon · · Score: 1

      the same theory worked quite nicely against the brittish ;)

      --
      "It's better to be a pirate then join the Navy"
    39. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Associate · · Score: 1

      1. Only the extremist would march. The real middle ground gun owner would lay low until the fighting began. Only a fool would hope for open conflict.

      2. The US government, subverted by perverts, would only turn on masses of it's own people if it had plans to empty the power vacuum. They would not go unresisted. ex Waco, Ruby Ridge,

      3. I hardly call the NRA disorganized.

      I could say more, but this borders on flaimbait.

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    40. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Kharny · · Score: 1

      Could you Tell that to:
      Jello Biafra, who got charged for selling "Adult" material in his cd booklets? The adult material in this case was a Giger Poster???? They broke into his house with 9 cops just to get a poster??
      Please also ask several innocent black freedom of right speakers currently in jail or even deathrow if they think that the justice system is fair.....

      --
      Make a man a fire and he will be warm for a day, set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life
    41. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Kharny · · Score: 1

      Living in the netherlands, where guns are not permitted, i have yet to see a soldier point his gun at me....We do however have a far lower death count in comparison to the USA

      --
      Make a man a fire and he will be warm for a day, set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life
    42. Re:Hmm, sounds odd... by Kharny · · Score: 1

      The USA will be a lot more Believable if they first started to follow the human right movement themselves instead of telling others to, while not doing so themselves. Don't Believe me, check amnesty on the USA....

      --
      Make a man a fire and he will be warm for a day, set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life
  3. Hmmm. by Gannoc · · Score: 5, Interesting
    (Now he's furiously trying to download movies he's missed and is mesmerized by open source and Slashdot.)

    He's trying to download movies on a Commodore?

    1. Re:Hmmm. by MaxQuordlepleen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yeah I wondered about that too.

      Maybe it's an Amiga, although my mental picture was a dusty C-64, tape drive and 300 bps modem.

    2. Re:Hmmm. by FortKnox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. Not only that, but Katz is milking the war in Afghanastan again.

      There hasn't been enough time for the "little village" to be sent new computers, and how does he even know how to connect to the internet? Dial into his local IP? Junoweb?

      Next question. What, in gods name, does this have to do with slashdot? News for nerds?

      I hate to flame/troll whatever, but I read this comment last Katz article, and I'm starting to agree with it...

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    3. Re:Hmmm. by Gannoc · · Score: 5, Insightful
      There hasn't been enough time for the "little village" to be sent new computers, and how does he even know how to connect to the internet? Dial into his local IP? Junoweb?

      Yep. I didn't want to be the one to say it, because I fear the mighty, mighty hand of Pro-Katz moderation, but the entire article smells like fiction.

      "He just dug out his commodore, one of the only 4 in the village, and now he's pirating movies and is "mesmerized" by open source and slashdot."

      I mean, you'd figure that anyone who can get a gnutella client working from a warzone has heard of linux before.

    4. Re:Hmmm. by istartedi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There hasn't been enough time for the "little village" to be sent new computers

      Sheesh... All you people saying things like this. Did you read the whole piece? He dug it out from under a chicken coop where it was hidden. Since he can watch movies with it, we should probably assume it's the more capable Amiga and not the C-64. A lot of people buried their contraband and waited out the Taliban. That itself is interesting--I'm sure some of those people died and left behind techno time capsules.

      and how does he even know how to connect to the internet? Dial into his local IP? Junoweb?

      It wouldn't surprise me if they were using some ancient phone system that was really easy to bluebox. The threat of losing your right hand has proven more effective than 128-bit encryption. Also, if he can dial Pakistan, he can probably dial a Pakistani ISP. Also, no FCC there! I bet they can amp their 802.11b all the way to Islamabad and back. If it were me though, I'd just waltz into what used to be the Taliban NOC and run CAT-5 from there.

      Anyone who can "first post" from a former Taliban NOC should get some kind of a prize... Penguin mints or something.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    5. Re:Hmmm. by JonWan · · Score: 1

      As any real Commodore user knows. Commodore made PCs, the last one I saw was a 386 but I think they made 486s too.

    6. Re:Hmmm. by nicedream · · Score: 1

      I have an old TI-99-4/A in my attic that probably doesn't work anymore from the temperature extremes

      I don't see how a Commodore is going to work after being UNDERGROUND for ~15 years.

    7. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Taliban had only been in power for five or six years. They took over in 1996, I'm pretty sure.

    8. Re:Hmmm. by Fishstick · · Score: 2

      >He dug it out from under a chicken coop

      I'm sorry, but that makes it all the more suspect. Maybe I'm just imagining the state of a cumputer that has been hidden under a chicken coop for a couple years.

      I would probably have found it easier to believe that he was able to get a laptop from Pakistani black market smugglers. I would imagine there are all kinds of opportunities now that the Taliban are gone, although there probably isn't much cash to spend on things. Barter economy is probably in effect.

      Here I have the latest American technology. In Pakistan it would sell for over 50,000 Drachmas. I can let you have it for, say, 3 goats.

      How about 2 goats and 6 sacks of rice from that blown-up RedCross warehouse?

      Ok, good!

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    9. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taliban got in power in 1996. IMHO that computer has been underground for ~5-6 years...

    10. Re:Hmmm. by elmegil · · Score: 1

      While your point is still valid, the Taliban haven't been in power for 15 years. Try 5 or 6.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    11. Re:Hmmm. by garcia · · Score: 2

      why am I seeing the moderation totals for this comment?

      He can download the movies on the Commodore but saving and viewing them would be another challenge :)

    12. Re:Hmmm. by ehiris · · Score: 1

      "Cafes had popped up all over"

      I think this will answer your question!

      People in poor countries get online usually in internet cafes since the price of a cheap computer, dialup and local telephone charges could hit their budget to the point where they couldn't afford food.

    13. Re:Hmmm. by JohnDenver · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't you think temperatures underground would fluctuate as much as they do in your attic.

      Also, Consider the reliability of 15 year old microchip technology vs. 5-6 year old technology. Remember when your Atari used to reboot and break all the time?

      Even if it WAS 15 year old technology, does temperature extremes have to affect ALL TI-99-4/A's?

      --
      "Communism is like having one [local] phone company " - Lenny Bruce
    14. Re:Hmmm. by Sonyc · · Score: 1

      Oh, they really do have phone lines to connect to the internet?

      --
      *warning: sig* In space, nobody can hear you scream.
    15. Re:Hmmm. by GiorgioG · · Score: 1, Redundant

      It sounds to me that Slashdot needs to hire a real tech news editor (c'mon /. gets enough readership to warrant it.) We've seen numerous b.s. articles in the past and this is obviously another one. I would certainly be willing to pay $1/month to get decent content (plus unbiased content - the anti-MS stuff has gotten VERY old)

    16. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iv'e had a P133 under my basement ( a pretty dusty, damp place in itself ) running for about 6 years now. It's undergone many upgrades. I started using it as a router for my ISDN line with linux (when IPNAT stuff was new to linux, before it was a console, Xserver.) Now, it's hooked to a DSL line, running FreeBSD, and IPF. Works marveously. Granted, the hard disk has crashed a few times in that span, from the constant running. The CPU and PS fans have each been replaced 2 times (they were starting to make quite a racket). I'm only now thinking of upgrading it to an athlon, because I need more CPU and memory for my database. Also, the Real time clock has freaked out, and my log times are all screwed up.

      So, I can see easily how a non running machine carefully packed in a water free environment could survive quite nicely. I don't however see how he could even begin to download movies (copression codecs have come a looong way since 1994, but my machine could deal with MPEG2 at small resolutions when it was a desktop machine - and they don't regullary distribute MPEG2 on moviez channels), so it does sound a bit ficticious, however, not improbable.

    17. Re:Hmmm. by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      If he buried the computer deep enough the temperatures would be uniformly cool. And he could have put it in a box for protection.

    18. Re:Hmmm. by istartedi · · Score: 2

      the temperature underground tends to remain constant. I don't know what ground temp is in Afghanistan, but usually they are less than room temp and higher than freezing. Condensation can be the kiss of death unless you are careful to dry out the components before power-up. If I were in such a situation, I'd be inclined to remove the boards and make sure they are dry before running it. I assume he had it in a sturdy box wrapped, and that the machine itself was wrapped in plastic to keep out dirt and moisture. At any rate, underground is more like a damp A/C environment, whereas the attic is more like an oven. I know what the attic does to vinyl. If you put anything with plastic parts in an attic, you might as well just save yourself the trouble and take it to a landfill.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    19. Re:Hmmm. by Otter · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It wouldn't surprise me if they were using some ancient phone system that was really easy to bluebox. The threat of losing your right hand has proven more effective than 128-bit encryption. Also, if he can dial Pakistan, he can probably dial a Pakistani ISP. Also, no FCC there! I bet they can amp their 802.11b all the way to Islamabad and back.

      I've seen some hairball setups in Southeast Asia that would have gotten a Slashdot mention if they'd been submitted as an MIT hack.

      But put together in a week by someone who hasn't touched a computer in years? And who isn't up to date on the current ISP situation? I'm having trouble buying that. And a lot of other details set off my BS detector: downloading movies, the iPod, the mention of the Microsoft trial (no Columbine reference!?!) ... I can't believe Katz would make this up, even if I do think he frequently presents paraphrases as eral comments he's received, but I'm thinking he got hoaxed.

      Truth is, that would be more interesting. If this story isn't true today, it certainly will be a year from now. As a hoax, it's a hell of a social engineering hack.

    20. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That, or "Junis" doesn't really exist. There are some things in the article which causes me to question whether Jon is being paid to make this up or not.

    21. Re: Hmmm. by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He's trying to download movies on a Commodore?

      Commodore is (was) a company, not a model. He didn't specify whether it was a C64, or Amiga 4000, either of which could be considered "ancient," however the Ami4k (Or even 2000) is quite capable of web browsing and playing movies.

    22. Re:Hmmm. by Old+Wolf · · Score: 2

      So the question is: did Katz invent the email, or was his poor brain fooled by some prankster?

    23. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, this is about all I can take. I've always questioned alot of stuff that has been posted here, but this is just ridiculous. I suppose it could have been posted in the humour category, but I would have found that to be in bad taste anyway. Slashdot just lost a reader.

    24. Re: Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does one find warez movies of current films on a format viewable on a Commodore? I do not know of any such places to find them.

    25. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about $10.00, you cheap fucking bastard.

    26. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUCK YOU.

      -CmdrTaco

    27. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JK is making it up as usual. Not content with saving teenagers in schools across America, he is now going to lead Afghan into the 21st century. A bullsheet artist.

    28. Re:Hmmm. by RicRoc · · Score: 1

      Commodore built 8088/8086 based PC-Compatibles Not just the beloved C=64 :-)

      --
      Who?
    29. Re:Hmmm. by JediLuke · · Score: 0, Troll
      /. is a news site...right there in the slogan "news for nerds..."

      News \News\, n [From New; cf. F. nounelles. News ?s plural in form, but is commonly used with a singular verb.]
      1. A report of recent occurences; information of something that has lately taken place, or of something before unknown; fresh tindings; recent intelligence.
      now basically news is defined as reporting of facts. the thing is that we seriously doubt JonKatz...he is the origional karma whore. its just that if he had any journalistic integrity, he would at least post the email, or tell the truth. but as we have all come to find out, he enjoys pulling stale nuggets out of his ass and posting that shit on /. now some people ignore his posts (i'm sure that's why it was put in) but i keep his in so i can see himself make a larger and larger fool. News != symbolism. there is nothing symbolic about "hey this kid in afganistan emailed me..." we just know he's full of shit and can't understand why he is allowed to post stories, especially when its neither news or shit we care about. so hows about you quit being a pussy?

      so let me recap:
      1. JonKatz sucks...not even an online mags or reputable news agencies would hire him.
      2. he makes shit up to look cool
      3. he's not cool...because he makes up news.
      4. most people here wouldn't care if didn't ever come back

      --

      JediLuke
      -Do or Do Not, There is no Try
    30. Re:Hmmm. by brettb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If Katz had posted the original email it would have lent a little more credibility to this story. I agree that certain statements sound a little fishy to me. However, I do believe that Internet use actually has increased in Afghanistan since the rousting of the Taliban began. About this same time of day two weeks ago,
      I checked the number of users from Afghanistan who were using Audiogalaxy. There were TWO. Today (as of this moment) there are ONE HUNDRED TWENTY THREE. Allow for some errors here. They may not all truly be from Afghanistan but I'd bet that a good portion of them are. It certainly sounds like an increase.

    31. Re:Hmmm. by aka-ed · · Score: 1
      a bit ficticious, however, not improbable.

      Huh? If it sounds ficticious, it would be because it is implausible. If somethng is implausible, it is very likely to be improbable as well.

      A kid downloading movies over the type of connection likely to be had in "a small town 35 miles southwest of Kabul" is impossible.

      "Baywatch" being watched in "a small town 35 miles southwest of Kabul" at this time is implausible.

      This being anything other than a troll, by Katz or to him, is improbable.

      The story is fictitious.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    32. Re:Hmmm. by Gannoc · · Score: 1
      Another method for spotting karma whores is to look for comments posting, verbatim, something stated in the article, or in the editor's summary. While this often includes italicizing the quote, this is frequently a ploy to show that the person read the article, even though it's more likely the person only skimmed to find a comment worth repeating

      Or, its because the author wrote a long tedious post, and you want to respond to one point of it and make sense.

    33. Re:Hmmm. by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1
      No need for the tech to be 15 years old. The taliban only took over outright in 1994.


      Not that I believe Katz, I'm highly skeptical of the communication infrastructure in Afganistan-- I thought that the majority of the phone system had been damaged in the past month.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    34. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes this story is a pile of crap....

      Every time Slashdot posts a Jon Katz story they seem to embaress themselves....

      This is total and utter 100% purified propaganda....

      When I see stuff like this it makes me think that perhaps the Taliban were right when they said TV and the internet are evil.

    35. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming they said this at all of course.... that too could be made up...lets face it these days information is no more free than it has ever been... it still comes all from one source and just because it is repeated a thousand times across the net doesn't mean that the original source is any more truth to it than it did to begin with.

    36. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do a search for how many people with the Osama Bin Laden nick, and you'll probably find that there are 1000's. But we all know theres only 1 Bin laden Terrorist.

      I suspect that most people putting Afghanistan for their location are just messing around.

    37. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here I have the latest American technology. In Pakistan it would sell for over 50,000 Drachmas.

      Are you suggesting that it's only the Greek minority population in Pakistan who have access to American technology?

    38. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are mostly Afghani's who emigrated to nations like Britian, Pakistan, US, Germany, South Korea, etc. Alot of them are also lying and just making up names of cities.

      meoffjack (ppoop)
      OCTAVIO200 (infonavit 5)
      SammieF (Vernon)
      bemyone (seoul)
      BIGPLAYERS2004 (LOS ANGELES)
      Bones2121 (jerusalem)
      joker_smoker (None)
      rapare (ceara)
      TomLee67 (gurude)
      brup (hun)
      nicolasgaal69 (Melbourne)
      liu333 (dsfds)
      Peketino (Bergalandia)
      lejend (singapore)
      j_selvz_05 (i dont know)
      No-Stra-Da-Mus (Freeze Land)
      NICOJUE (Moreno)
      sautner (calgary)
      TOMMY_7847895 (VGU)
      ass76599 (sarsars)
      parcheeseme (gravytown)
      Sumtymes (Victoria)
      geribla (manaus)
      spongebob5706 (beverly hills)
      -OsamaBinLaden- (the... the world trade center down)
      willi_Caolho (satans hill)
      ZORG_WOA (PoA)
      la melida (wonderland)
      oscarvn (hgcfgedsfdxgc)
      nottoofar (dfs)
      -SiMEK- (£ÓD?)
      Cockhead355 (Sydney)
      htttds (oklahoma)
      supermeb (bridgewater)
      dadadedido (Sta Maria)
      Da_Books (BLOW MY DIK)
      rtqwetert (ewrewe)
      vinosss (san fernando)
      ynos0001 (Cabul)
      321andres123 (liitinton)
      Feli1103 (Tres Arroyos)
      michigan_punk (Carson City)
      fspanont (maringá)
      fapa1982 (Bucaramanga)
      soverst1 (Yesville)
      asdwvervrw5h (rvervrff)
      rapamana (santaigo)
      seramisseramis (hir)

    39. Re:Hmmm. by arpit · · Score: 1

      Lol yes. For a moment there I almost thought it was the 1st of April. :-)

    40. Re:Hmmm. by Arquimides · · Score: 1

      1000% on. By the way, Mr Myagui does look like Yoda, not Luke (I think)

    41. Re:Hmmm. by Compton+Q.+Groundhog · · Score: 1

      Hell, Commodore-branded PCs are still being sold (at least, as of a few months ago) by a company named Tulip, which is the most recent owner of the name & logo.

    42. Re:Hmmm. by jweatherley · · Score: 1

      I suspect that most people putting Afghanistan for their location are just messing around.

      A lot of sites that ask for your country of origin have a HUGE drop down list of every country on the earth. I've selected 'Afghanistan' from the top of the list rather than scroll all the way down to 'United Kingdom' many times...

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
    43. Re:Hmmm. by Progman · · Score: 1

      no, Al Gore invented email.

    44. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you are going to troll this at least take responsibility and say why you pussies.

      this site is going down the crapper hardcore...

    45. Re:Hmmm. by Snogpitch · · Score: 1

      It's quite possible that a Commodore is being used. Remember the Amiga? This computer did special effects for the likes of Babylon 5 and others. Also possible, is the fact that in 1995 when Escom bought Commodore, they produced Pentium computers. Granted 100mhz computers aren't that fast, but you can watch movies with a system at that speed. Since we don't know for a fact what movies were actually being watched, they could have been simple ascii movies many of us have seen on BBS's back in the early 90's, late 80's.

      So, I don't find it hard to believe this person has a computer, watching/downloading stuff. But I wonder where is the electricity coming from? How is the internet being accessed? I just find the email more that unbelieveable, even if you try to account for a few "possibilities".

    46. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two afgan sites already up and running. Log on to http://www.afgha.com/index.php

      or

      http://www.afghan-web.com/aop/ptoday.html

      Afgan web is connected to the site http://www.payamemujahid.com/payam/day.htm
      The Payamemujahid site only operates when there is power in the panjir (sp) valley.
      anon

  4. silly question for katz by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2
    How did you email you without electricity. I was under the impression that electricity was hard to get and only kandahar and kabul had it in limited quantities. Even if your friend had solar panels how did he connect without the phone lines? Maybe cnn likes to exagerate the living conditions in afganistan for ratings but I was given a nasty impression on how afgans lived.

    1. Re:silly question for katz by Gleef · · Score: 2

      There also exist small generators that work well off of LP Gas or even Alcohol. Not saying that's what he uses, but it's another possibility.

      A professional programmer in Afghanistan is likely to have access funds and resources that the average person does not.

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
    2. Re:silly question for katz by J4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um.. If the guys a programmer, what has he been doing since 1995? Working for the Taliban? Or just scratching out code in the dirt? I'm sorry it sounds like BS to me.

    3. Re:silly question for katz by efgbr · · Score: 1

      There are people in there who live just like you and me. The other 99% live like CNN showed.

      You have to remember that in poor countries the social differences are greater than in developed countries.

  5. Downloading movies on a Commodore? by sailracer6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So let me get this straight - your friend was catching up with movies on a Commodore?

    Still, interesting story.

    1. Re:Downloading movies on a Commodore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      An AMIGA is a Commodore, and can do things you linux freaks can't imagine.

    2. Re:Downloading movies on a Commodore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...including running linux. heh.

    3. Re:Downloading movies on a Commodore? by rebug · · Score: 1

      -1 redundant, I know

      but the Amiga can play divx

      --

      there's more than one way to do me.
  6. about time! by steveargonman · · Score: 1

    It's about time the Afghan's can make their own decisions in peace. I hope they can form a democratic type government and live in peace. :-)

    1. Re:about time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully not a democratic republic like the USA though!

    2. Re:about time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think what the plan is to impliment a "little USA" government...and you wonder why islamic groups get pissed off with America trying to Americanise the middle east.

  7. poor bastards... by joss · · Score: 2

    Daisy cutters and cluster bombs are kinda unfriendly. Not exactly "surgical" either..

    But Baywatch .. that is too cruel.

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
  8. Jon, you were trolled by typical+geek · · Score: 5, Funny
    Exactly how does an Ubergeek in Afghanistan use an ancient Commodore to download and play movies? My K6-2 barely plays DIVX, and it's only 3 years old.


    How can this Afghani geek afford an Ipod? When did DSL/broadband get into Kabul?


    This story sounds fishy, but then it is Tuesday.

    1. Re:Jon, you were trolled by DrPsycho · · Score: 2

      I'm still using my Amiga 4000, which compared to your K6-2 is ancient. It still hooks up just fine to the 'Net, and downloading and playing movies is a snap.

      Mind you, I still have a lot of difficulty with Jon's article, and the facts contained therein. It all feels so much less than plausible. A good story, maybe, but fact? Hrm.

      Anyway. Just standing up for my oft' beleagured but still treasured Amiga. :^P

      --

      -DrPsycho - Coping with reality since 1975

    2. Re:Jon, you were trolled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How can this Afghani geek afford an Ipod?


      Drug money, Afghanistan is the heroin factory for the world.

    3. Re:Jon, you were trolled by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

      As I recall, we were all damn impressed when we could get our C-64 to play about 30 seconds of poorly digitized music back in 1986.

      It wouldn't fit much more than that in the 48K or so we had to give it.

      A movie? Hmmmm.. maybe as a series of black-and-white screens... that is, the scren alternates between black and white.

    4. Re:Jon, you were trolled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm still using my Amiga 4000, which compared to your K6-2 is ancient. It still hooks up just fine to the 'Net, and downloading and playing movies is a snap.

      Really? I would like to know what's the best resolution/quality you can get running. We're talking about MPEG, right?

    5. Re:Jon, you were trolled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drug money, Afghanistan is the heroin factory for the world

      Yeah, but they don't see any of the money. The profit margins go up as one goes higher up the distribution chain... the growers at the bottom get practically nothing. More than they'd get growing turnips, yes, but not by much.

      Unless he's a high-level drug lord type. Which would be an interesting twist to the story. ;)

    6. Re:Jon, you were trolled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mabey this line from the article can explain:

      There are many computers in Afghanistan, Junis said, many in clusters in cities like Kabul and Kandahar.

      They are using Beowulf clusters of Commodores to watch movies :)

    7. Re:Jon, you were trolled by memyselfandmyhand · · Score: 0

      Look for my post earlier. Amigas were a good 5 years ahead of x86 pc's. an Amiga 4000 would handle fullscreen mpeg without breaking a sweat.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=23886&cid=25 94 380

    8. Re:Jon, you were trolled by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      On my '060 Amiga, 320x240 MPEGs play ok. Higher resolutions start to get choppy or slow (depending on the software).

      Possibilities include:

      1. It's all bullshit
      2. He's sacrificing quality (playing slooowly or with lots of frame loss)
      3. He has a PPC (fullspeed playback with a 604e is very plausible)
      4. He is decompressing/decoding not in real time and converting to a less cpu-intense format, and then playing
      It's all just on the edge of plausibility... But IMHO it's bullshit. :-)
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  9. Uhhhhh... by InfinityWpi · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Does anyone else thing that this sounds an awful lot like someone got a fake email? A hoax, a sham, an untruth? It just seems too... too... too much like what we geeks would want to hear.

    1. Re:Uhhhhh... by caesar-auf-nihil · · Score: 1

      I agree, it does sound a bit too fake. Perhaps it was sent by the same US commandos to help ensure winning the propaganda war.

      Unless this guy is talking about an souped-up Commodore Amiga, I can't see him having any success doing any of the things he's claiming he's currently doing, unless he's got satellite access. I had thought just about all phone lines and servers that could connect with Afghanistan were under severe control so Al Qaeda could not send instructions out or get information in. For this guy to just wander around like nothing has changed seems a bit implausible.

      --
      -When going for broke, go for Ithaca!
    2. Re:Uhhhhh... by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      OK, how long ago was Kabul liberated? About a week right.

      How did this "Afghani" attain Jon Katz's email address? Its no where on the slashdot site (I think its katz@slashdot.org, but that's cause he had it attached to his "name link" like 6-12 months ago). So this kid gets on the internet and actually does some type of investigating to eventually write an email to Jon Katz.

      Yes, this is the lowest Katz has gone! He must be skimming off that moderator crack...

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    3. Re:Uhhhhh... by MindStalker · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Fuck that! I've been stuck at 52 for years now, and its really annoying. Priceless my ASS.! Posting with score +1 cause I got karma to BURN BABY! Bring me down to 51! I dare you!

    4. Re:Uhhhhh... by Christianfreak · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I agree. These people are the poorest in the world. They don't have access to this sort of thing... face it Katz, you've been had... guess you'll check your sources next time. (or not)

      Go ahead flame my 50 karma :)

    5. Re:Uhhhhh... by dragons_flight · · Score: 3

      I would agree, except that Katz says he knows this person from before the Taliban. That makes it very unlikely anyone duped Katz. Of course I could believe that Katz and/or Junis are exagerrating a wee bit. Sensationalism on Slashdot? Never.

      The only other alternative would be that Katz is outright making it up, but much as I've disagreed with him before, I don't think he would stoop that low.

    6. Re:Uhhhhh... by DaoudaW · · Score: 2

      I wondered about this too, but the more I read the more it rang true. I've lived in Africa and India and let me tell you, people know what they want and find ways to get it.

      I only wish that Katz had posted the email, rather than just talking about it. His comments don't always ring true. For example: nobody in Asia would think of martial art's movies as coming from America. Think Bollywood, not Hollywood!

    7. Re:Uhhhhh... by StaticLimit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I admit, after reading the first few lines and knowing that there are all sorts of stupid Sept 11 and Afganistan hoax emails going around, I was skeptical. But a lot of the criticism here ignores what Katz wrote.

      a forwarded e-mail from Junis

      routed to Kabul, then Islamabad, then London

      Ok, so the people who said "How did he get Katz's email address!" didn't read that it was forwarded to John from someone in London.

      Junis, a computer geek obsessed with Linux, had first e-mailed me years ago while I was writing for Hotwired

      And it seems to me that the folks suggesting this is just another typical internet chain-email hoax missed the part where Junis had written to Katz before! Come on people. Just because you don't personally know anyone in Kabul, Islamabad, or London doesn't mean that a well known journalist (and he is well known, and respected, in geek journalist circles) wouldn't have enough connections to get an interesting email from someone in a newsworthy place.

      Could it all be made up as a device for another article overusing the phrases "geek", "open-source", and other buzz-words about the pervasiveness of the net and the radical societal shifts brought about by the rise of the geeks? Sure.

      Could the government be hiding evidence of alien landings at Roswell and poisoning our water with mind-control flouride so we won't notice the UN's silent black helicoptors when they come to impose the oppressive new world order and take our guns away? Um...sure.

      Too many people want to validate conspiracy theories instead of debating the ideas Katz brings up.

      - StaticLimit

    8. Re:Uhhhhh... by JonWan · · Score: 1

      It costs 12 cents US to go to the movies. The average Afghan doesn't likely make more than $200.00 a year, so electricity, a phone line and Net access will likely be prices very cheap by western standards.

    9. Re:Uhhhhh... by bwt · · Score: 1, Troll

      And it seems to me that the folks suggesting this is just another typical internet chain-email hoax missed the part where Junis had written to Katz before!

      Oh come on. You don't really expect people to read the article carefully before they bash Katz do you? They already know he has the cushy job writing on slashdot that they all want, so what difference does it make whether or not they read the article -- it just takes them longer to find something to bash about him when they are constrained by the facts.

    10. Re:Uhhhhh... by I.T.R.A.R.K. · · Score: 0
      "and he is well known, and respected, in geek journalist circles

      Okay, now I KNOW you're trolling. ;)

      - I throw rocks at retarded kids

      --

      "Adequacy.org: Where congenital stupidity is not an option, but a requirement."

    11. Re:Uhhhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Katz is definitely bluffing here!!! The Taliban took over in 1996. Linux wasnt all that popular then and the internet was definitely still unknown in this part of the world! I'd be VERRRRY surprised if an impoversihed nation like Afghanistan which doesnt even have a decent international telephone gateway [all calls are routed thru Pakistan] had a gateway for the net! Remember that Afghanistan was the 3rd poorest country in the world even before the Taliban came. It is ridiculous to even suppose that there existed some geek who had access to the net before that!

      PS: The 4 commodores in one VILLAGE is really preposterous. I'd be surprised if that town even had electricity or even paved roads!

    12. Re:Uhhhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What he said was very reasonable. Katz is not well respected.

    13. Re:Uhhhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sig has me in tears! My co-worker and I are ROTFLOAO! It's so wrong yet so matter of fact. You just made an incredibly boring day brighter. May your mug or your bed never be empty.

  10. Amiga perhaps? by wiredog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I reckon one of those could play movies.

    1. Re:Amiga perhaps? by rebug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      of course it could.

      --

      there's more than one way to do me.
    2. Re:Amiga perhaps? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Sure it could, but you need to consider to play a divx movie on an Amiga you'd have to have something in excess of a 68060 - the fastest native processor one can have. Considering how few PowerPC turbo boards there are running around for it I doubt he has a 604 or a G4.

    3. Re:Amiga perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actualy they are pretty much the standard now, PPC
      board that is, but the AmigaOne will have no old
      68K chip on it...... now wouldnt an Os that takes
      only 6megs of ram: be fun with a Radion8500 &
      a 2.4ghz G5 on that new mobo :)))

      I'm saving hard!!

      -Panthro

  11. Re:Please read this : help /., stop karma whores by silicon_synapse · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What have you been smoking? Whore

  12. The big question by PanBanger · · Score: 4, Funny

    Has he gotten spammed yet?

    1. Re:The big question by dagoalieman · · Score: 1

      Too bad he doesn't have a userid with a web page.. It'd be pretty funny to /. a Commodore (three people.) OK. Not that funny. But repeated /.ing for the next month or so at least.

      It'd pretty darned cool to get a web server running on a Commodore too..

      It should be noted, btw, that while they are much more free in what they can do, in general I've heard they still live under Islamic law/morals, and so many things that we take for granted are limited for them (on basis of Religion, some self dictated, some by the N. Alliance...)

      --
      We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
  13. American culture and junk food by sterno · · Score: 1

    American culture is like junk food. Almost everybody really likes it but they feel bad for liking it. They know they should choose something that's better for them but they can't help it.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  14. I wonder..... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    Does John make this stuff up? I have read many of his features and a lot of them seem to have a taste of fiction of sorts. I am sure it just comes from the slight embelishmnet he places on his writings but it just makes you wonder.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:I wonder..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, come on. Feel the romanticism of digging up a chicken coop containing one of the village's few secret, dusty Commodore 64s! And an iPod -- what better insanely expensive luxury item for a poor, incredibly impovrished nation to start picking up like mad!

      You have to feel the story flow. Liberated geeks! It's got a happy ending!

  15. Well, half the population is less oppressed... by daoine · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They open the theaters, people get their TVs and computers back. It's good.

    But the women aren't allowed in the theater, they can't function in public, and they still aren't allowed to see doctors. It's not that removing the Taliban is a bad thing, but for a significant part of the population, the current status really hasn't gotten any better.

    Food for thought, and it makes me thankful that I was born in the US and have the ability to say such things...

    1. Re:Well, half the population is less oppressed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are counting too much on your press. Afghan women are not at all opressed, what you see is tribes (I know it because your media shows Pakistan like that too and I know most Pakistani women are more free than any US women can dream of.)

      In US there are more women than men, but they are still treated as a minority. And it was not the case in Afghanistan and Kabul did actually have a pretty advanced culture.

      It was Russians (the new U.S. Ally) who are responsible for all this.

      And for God.s sake dont listne to this Katz idiot

    2. Re:Well, half the population is less oppressed... by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      >they still aren't allowed to see doctors

      I thought the problem was the male Doctors aren't allowed to see the women unclothed, but the Taliban doesn't allow female Doctors either.

      Catch-22

    3. Re:Well, half the population is less oppressed... by daoine · · Score: 1
      ...I know it because your media shows Pakistan like that too and I know most Pakistani women are more free than any US women can dream of....

      Actually, I'd say that's incorrect, because I don't think the US Media has ever stated that Pakistani women are oppressed. At least I haven't seen it on ANY of the news sources over here.

      Furthermore, it's not only US media sources that point to the poor treatment of women under Taliban rule.

      And why the hell am I replying to an AC post anyway?

    4. Re:Well, half the population is less oppressed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Oh Yes, they were pouring the same poison about Pakistan for a long time, probably then realized that Pakistan is on their side.
      Actually Afghan Women have been lot more liberated then even Pakistani women. It was Russia (new US ally) that caused all those people to flee, and the only people left there were the tribes which are mostly uneducated people. Those uneducated people are now being controlled by a former US ally.

    5. Re:Well, half the population is less oppressed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Former U.S. Ally???.

    6. Re:Well, half the population is less oppressed... by z19752002 · · Score: 1

      Actually, medicine was one of the few areas women were allowed to work in under the Taliban. Now where women doctors were supposed to come from when education for women was banned, I don't know.

    7. Re:Well, half the population is less oppressed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I read, Afghan women were allowed to hold professional jobs before the Taliban. They had female doctors, teachers, etc. The Taliban outlawed those (probably forbade them to practice on pain of death).

      Even if women don't get 100% equality, things probably will become a lot better.

    8. Re:Well, half the population is less oppressed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He seems to think that we were allied with the Taliban. Have pity on the uneducated.

    9. Re:Well, half the population is less oppressed... by Mulciber+1 · · Score: 1

      What's your source on this information? In many Afghan cities, women *were* doctors before the Taliban takeover. Female doctors generally worked on female patients, but it's a far cry from "not being allowed to see doctors..."

    10. Re:Well, half the population is less oppressed... by Oztun · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry but he is right and you are mistaken. Women were doctors 20 years ago before the Soviet invasion. After the invasion the Northern Alliance was very harsh and would not allow women to be doctors. Right now it is a state of turmoil and there is not real government in power. Unfortunatley the US will most likely help the NA get into power and womens rights will suffer. Of course the only represent 14% of the population and a coup will no doubt take place again. Most likely by the Taliban only under a different name. The facts are all there go do some research and you will see.

    11. Re:Well, half the population is less oppressed... by daoine · · Score: 1

      Um, never said that women never held jobs -- nor did I say they've been oppressed for their entire lives.

      The point I made was that under the Taliban, women were oppressed - ridiculously, and removing the Taliban from power has not made their situation any better, as a contrast to the original story about how computers and movies make everything great.

      So, I'm not quite sure how I'm mistaken, since the scope of my post was discussing the Taliban and post Taliban rule, not pre and post Soviet invasion (an entirely different topic)

    12. Re:Well, half the population is less oppressed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, never said that women never held jobs -- nor did I say they've been oppressed for their entire lives.
      The point I made was that under the Taliban, women were oppressed - ridiculously, and removing the Taliban from power has not made their situation any better, as a contrast to the original story about how computers and movies make everything great.
      So, I'm not quite sure how I'm mistaken, since the scope of my post was discussing the Taliban and post Taliban rule, not pre and post Soviet invasion (an entirely different topic)

    13. Re:Well, half the population is less oppressed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      duh they were doctors BEFORE the taliban came to power - that's where doctors came from

  16. Forget the US Air Force, here comes the RIAA by bear_phillips · · Score: 5, Funny

    What are the odds that the copy of Independence Day is pirated.

    --
    http://www.windmeadow.com/
    1. Re:Forget the US Air Force, here comes the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MPAA retard. RIAA is music.

    2. Re:Forget the US Air Force, here comes the RIAA by TheDick · · Score: 1

      Its hard to check your acronyms when you are Karma Whoring for F1rzt P0zt.

      --

  17. Just a reminder... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This is a good reminder that there are good, forward thinking, open minded people everywhere. You can oppress them but you can't destroy them. It's guys like this who will help lift Afghanistan out of poverty. Let's say he brings over the kids who live in his town and shows them his computer, let's them play old games. Some kid dreams of learning how computers work. He grows up, travels off to an engineering school somewhere, and comes back and starts a technology company in the budding economy of Afghanistan as it modernizes.


    Of course, as nice as this sounds, the story is a little strange - I was under the impression there were almost no remaining international phone lines and that electricity was probably out in many of these areas, so I am a bit suspicious. But what do I know, maybe he has a generator and maybe the international phone lines are back up. Also the line about trying to download movies is definitely suspicious. At 9600 baud perhaps? OK, give them the benefit of the doubt, 28.8k. Doesn't sound too believable to me.


    So I think this submission is either a bit of a hoax or a bit exaggerated, but it still is a nice sentiment even if the specifics are not true. And hopefully there is a guy somewhere in Afghanistan digging up his old Commodore. :)

    1. Re:Just a reminder... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2
      Hmm and looking at the story again (did Katz just edit it and add more stuff at the end?) It now mentions iPods and has some really unbelievable quotes in it attributed to this guy.


      I'm just trying to figure out if Katz was trolled or if he is knowingly propagating false information. Journalistic integrity == 0.

    2. Re:Just a reminder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fastest baud rate a C64 could handle was 9600 - it couldn't physically handle anything faster. Mind you, in order to hook up even a 9600 baud modem you'd have had to buy a special adapter. Otherwise, you'd be on 2400 baud. Mind you, back in those days, that would make you quite the speed demon.

    3. Re:Just a reminder... by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 1

      This is a good reminder that there are good, forward thinking, open minded people everywhere. You can oppress them but you can't destroy them.

      Interestingly, for a long time I had similar beliefs. In fact, there was a line in the Old Man and the Sea which I found particularly inspirational: But a man is not made for defeat. A man can be destroyed but not defeated.

      Then I read 1984 and its depressing hopelessness made me realize that sometimes, human cruelty and oppression can crush even the most daring and free spirit. But I'm glad those poor devils in Afghanistan are finally the center of all attention, so maybe things will turn good for them.

    4. Re:Just a reminder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      He grows up, travels off to an engineering school somewhere, and comes back and starts a technology company in the budding economy of Afghanistan as it modernizes.


      If he comes to the US, gets an engineering degree he'll never return to Afghanistan. What's there to return to, really? If he goes back, he won't really get paid much. There is too much money to be made here. That is "partially" the reason why places in Africa and Asia lack a really good technological infrastructure. Students leave to come to "America" to get a better life, and when they do get it, most don't return to help their countries with their newly found knowledge and skill. The stay in the US and make money and send a few dollars "back home" to "help", instead of going back.

      But you can't really blame them, it's all about the money. Black or white, Asian or American, either way you slice it, it's all about the money. The sad fact is nobody "really" cares.

      Okay, I'm rambling. I'll stop now.

    5. Re:Just a reminder... by RalphTWaP · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Katz,

      I know, it's a little odd when you get hit with demands for factuality and proof. I mean, any of us who'd spent so much time writing opinion-based fluff would probably have a slightly hazy view of reality.

      But for god's sake man.

      Leaving aside the technical details already well-discussed, do us all a favor, and if it's not entirely a hoax, save whatever remains of your reputation and post the original email.

      We're mostly big-boys here, post us a copy with the routing headers intact, give us the text, and then spend two or three hundred words pointing out how great it is.

      We might still belive you got rooked, but at least we're less likely to attribute what prima facia appears to be a load of... um, horse-shit to you.

    6. Re:Just a reminder... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      I don't entirely agree. India has had a lot of people return to teach the skills and knowledge they acquired in the west to eager students there. That's why IIT is an excellent engineering school there now, on par with many American engineering schools.


      Sure, a lot of H1Bs come over here because they can make more bucks here and want to stay. And people from fundamentally economically depressed areas who don't acquire sufficient skills to start businesses and contribute to the economy back home just send a few bucks here and there but never return. A lot of Mexicans for example seem to have stayed here because all they got was menial labor and not an education.


      But I've also met Malaysians and Indonesians who are extremely eager to go back home and work for companies there as executives or start their own companies with the knowledge and experience they've acquired here. And I think that's great.

    7. Re:Just a reminder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait... so you read one piece of fiction, and it made you believe that the human spirit can't be crushed, then you read another piece of fiction, and it made you believe that oppression can crush any spirit. do we see a problem here?

    8. Re:Just a reminder... by Jburkholder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod this up. This is the right answer. If this email exists, post it so we can figure out what it is, cause it seems rather unlikely that it is authentic.

    9. Re:Just a reminder... by daviddennis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You forget something interesting, which really hit home yesterday when I read an article in The Atlantic(*) about the difference between the Blues (people living in urban areas who voted for Gore) and Reds (people living in rural areas voting for Bush).

      It noted that the average household income in a "Blue" area pushed $100k, while the average household income in a "Red" area was about $42k. So why weren't the reds resentful towards the blues?

      Cost of living.

      An average house in a Blue area goes for $400,000-1.5 million. The same house in a Red area costs $140k or so. A $ 42k household can easily afford a $140k house. A $100k household cannot easily afford even a $400k house. So who is really better off economically, the Reds or the Blues?

      I looked this up in realtor.com and sure enough, he was right. And he had other examples. He couldn't spend $20 a plate dining out in ANY Red restaurant. This, of course, is par for the course around the Blue parts of town. He got a parking ticket in Redsville, and it cost him $3 instead of $25. And so on.

      The phenomenon is going to be even more extreme in Afghanistan, a country where the average income is not even possible to determine with any accuracy. $1,000 a year is a fortune over there, but that wouldn't even pay my phone+DSL bill for the same period.

      If you could make $1,000 a year in Afghanistan, you might well be better off than people making $100k in San Francisco, because that $100,000 just doesn't go very far.

      The catch, though, is that living in a Blue area is a lot more enjoyable for more sophisticated people then red areas. When I wandered through South Florida, I saw plenty of places where the only radio was some preacher talking about having us saved. Sadly, if you're a True Blue, even the cheapest housing in the world probably won't make you happy in a Red zone. And that may apply to foreigners, too.

      D

      (*) Sadly, the article is not online.

    10. Re:Just a reminder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, cost of living is not everything. Having a very low cost of living is useless if there's nothing you can buy that's worth buying with all that spare money. When my parents were in Romania, they earned lots of money by the country's standards, but what could they do with it? Nothing.

      For instance, the problem when going to the restaurant is that there was *no* better food to spend more money on. There wasn't a more expensive bottle of wine that you could get instead of the crap anyone else could get. The shops were empty of anything worth buying...

      etc...

      So cost of living is one thing, but availability is equally important.

      Daniel

    11. Re:Just a reminder... by kevlar · · Score: 0

      He won't post it because its a crock of bs.

    12. Re:Just a reminder... by Pentagram · · Score: 1

      >He grows up, travels off to an engineering
      >school somewhere

      Travels to an engineering school? Where? Afghanistan? There's almost no infrastructure left; currently we're bombing rubble and shacks. The West? With what money?

    13. Re:Just a reminder... by JoeShmoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd just like to point out a couple things:

      1) Back in 1995-1996 I was downloading plenty of movies at 9600 or 14.4 baud. They were all in the old ViVo format (.VIV which was purchased by Real a couple years later). I think the first one I ever downloaded was Boobwatch. Each movie was only about 60-100MB in size and could easily be downloaded overnight. The bitrate was HORRIBLE but back the thrill of downloading an ENTIRE MOVIE made up for it.

      2) My only 486 could never in its wildest dreams play DivX, which is MPEG-4 and requires a crapload of processing power...but even a lowly 486 can handle MPEG-1 or low bitrate RealMedia. So I can believe it's possible to watch movies on even an old Commodore PC clone.

      3) The warez scene outside the G8 looks completely different. There is virtually no sympathy for copyright interests, especially US ones. You are more than likely to find major warez sites being run from state-owned resources (I myself was once offered access to a site that resolved to something under iif.hu and, judging from the amount of information it contained, had obviously been running for months). The scene is usually very close knit and tight. If you only have one or two ISPs then you get to know the staff pretty intimately, and from there its very easy to develop a "communal software resource".

      I think a good way to look at computer users in these underdeveloped countries is to compare them to HAM radio users. They have a piece of hardware that connects them to a larger community of users, and sooner or later they'll run into someone in their own area, and from there they can exchange contact with others they have met and boom, a local user group is born.

      - JoeShmoe

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    14. Re:Just a reminder... by cDarwin · · Score: 0, Troll

      I owe about half a mill on my current house. The main thing I get for my money is adjacency to people who are well off and well educated like me. I enjoy interacting with the people in my locale. And, the whole community is designed for people like us, with lots of cool book stores, eateries with interesting food, offbeat movie theaters and places to buy cool stuff. We keep the place clean, preserve open spaces and enjoy an outstanding quality of life here. And, best of all, we don't have to deal with those bible thumping idiots from the Red areas.

      --

      --
      Socrates was asked where he was from. He replied not "Athens," but "The world."

    15. Re:Just a reminder... by mindriot · · Score: 1

      Aside from the fact that it's most likely a hoax, I'm not entirely sure that it's a big step forward for Afghans to be able to receive Baywatch, Survivor, and Temptation Island.

      I actually feel kind of sorry for them.

    16. Re:Just a reminder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you feel sorry for yourself?

    17. Re:Just a reminder... by Anthony · · Score: 1

      For the last 6 years, many Afghans have been selling all their property and posessions and setting out across the world. They are spending thousands of dollars in the pursuit of a better life. A lot of these posts here assume that everyone in Afghanistan is a dirt-poor peasant raking over rocks, eking out a living in a total wasteland. Sure there is a lot of that but that is not the lot of every Afghani.

      --
      Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
    18. Re:Just a reminder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I prefer where I live in the midwest. $140k house with a $100k salary.

      Oh yeah, and I'm a Blue!

    19. Re:Just a reminder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember when I first bought a 9600 bps modem, and my 386 would barely handle it.

      I don't believe a C64 would handle anything faster than a 1200 baud modem without a special adapter.

    20. Re:Just a reminder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like anyone who reads slashdot has a job.

    21. Re:Just a reminder... by pclminion · · Score: 1
      2) My only 486 could never in its wildest dreams play DivX, which is MPEG-4 and requires a crapload of processing power...but even a lowly 486 can handle MPEG-1 or low bitrate RealMedia. So I can believe it's possible to watch movies on even an old Commodore PC clone.

      Commodore never made PC clones. The computers it did make that bore the name "Commodore" were the Commodore 64 and the Commodore 128. Both processors were under 1 megahertz (don't remember the exact speed), and were 8-bit.

      Let me put it to you this way: the CPU in the Commodore did not have a multiply instruction. How do you decode compressed video data when you cannot even multiply without using a lookup table? Magic? This feat would be impossible. Even if it were possible, the video adapter in the Commodore, although quite unique in its capabilities, would never have been able to display video images with any reasonable quality.

      In short, as so many others have made so clear, this entire story is a complete farce.

      Of course it's great to hear Commodore mentioned :) I've still got one...

    22. Re:Just a reminder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "1) Back in 1995-1996 I was downloading plenty of movies at 9600 or 14.4 baud. They were all in the old ViVo format (.VIV which was purchased by Real a couple years later). I think the first one I ever downloaded was Boobwatch. Each movie was only about 60-100MB in size and could easily be downloaded overnight. The bitrate was HORRIBLE but back the thrill of downloading an ENTIRE MOVIE made up for it. "

      You can still find Boobwatch and other Vivo videos out there. It still takes forever to download them if you have dialup.

    23. Re:Just a reminder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but your stuck in the midwest. Your biggest cultural outlet is the local cow tipping excursion. Unless you live in Chicago, it is a toddling town.

    24. Re:Just a reminder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong. In addition to the 1MHz 8-bitters, Commodore also made some IBM-PC compatables, and best of all, they made the legendary Amiga.

      All bore the name "Commodore"

  18. In that case... by MajorBurrito · · Score: 2, Informative

    Welcome Back!

    1. Re:In that case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have got to be fucking kidding me! This is informative?

      Well, I guss in the context of this article it could be...

    2. Re:In that case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah it's just moderators showing their frustration with the moderation system

    3. Re:In that case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately /. management won't get the message. Someone needs to take it up to +5 for Taco to even read it. 2 lost informational value when the posting bonus was implemented.

      Even so, they have seen plenty of +5 insightfuls of "Linus is so cool." and they still haven't taken any action.

  19. Hrm... I'm skeptic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apart from the fact that he's supposedly saying that he's "downloading movies" on a commodore (ie a machine with little or no hard drive and no processing power to decode div-x's, with modems that are so antiquated that even downloading a 20meg divx would probably take a few weeks... no wonder he's furious...), it all sounds... I don't know... fake is probably the word.

    As for digging up all the forbidden stuff as soon while they could still see the dust from the trucks of the talibans, that is just plain unbelievable. I doubt anyone who's just lived under such an oppressive regime would take that risk. What if they forgot something and drive back up to get it? Just because the trucks have driven away doesn't mean they're gone for good.

    I would think that people living under oppressive regimes develop a sort of natural paranoia as a survival mechanism... my father who lived most of his life in communist Romania still has it twenty years after fleeing the country... I find it surprising that afghans would lose it in minutes...

    Daniel

    1. Re:Hrm... I'm skeptic by Lakers · · Score: 1

      You stated it best, "I would think"

      Do you really know? Do any of us? Have you ever lived in oppression?

    2. Re:Hrm... I'm skeptic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess no one out there that claims to be a long standing geek can remember the fact that Commodore was making full blown PCs before they disappeared. I had a room mate that had a 386 made by Commodore....

    3. Re:Hrm... I'm skeptic by drj11 · · Score: 1

      You are right to be skeptical but I don't think that soldiers fleeing a besieged city that is about to be overrun worry about whether they should go back for the wristwatch they left by the bed.

    4. Re:Hrm... I'm skeptic by z_gringo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the bedside table on the little kangaroo! Of all the things she coulda forgot, I can't beleive she forgot the watch!

      --
      -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
  20. Thanks Katz.. by Brother+Larry · · Score: 1

    for the very good outlook of what is going on over there. It's nice to see that they can pick up their lives right away.

  21. Passion for pop culture ... by wwight · · Score: 1
    Passion for pop culture relentlessly undermined repressive governments like Poland, East Germany and the former Soviet Union.

    So, in the end it will be America's lust for half-naked teen nymphettes (I'm referring to Brittney Spears, Christina Agulera and the like -- not pr0n) that will promote the freedom of information and save us all from terrorism?

    1. Re:Passion for pop culture ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we always knew that britney was good for something other than super-impositions.

  22. Forgive me by Wind_Walker · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Forgive me for being skeptical, but I seriously doubt that an e-mail that got routed through 3 intermediaries before it made its way onto Jon Katz's inbox has any validity.

    The people of Afghanistan don't have televisions, they don't have music, and they don't have telephones... but they have e-mail access one day after the Northern Alliance "liberates" the city? And, coincidentally, he likes Open Source and Slashdot? What???

    I'm sorry, but I just can't honestly believe this story to be true without some kind of third-party verification. And even then, I'd still be skeptical. It just doesn't sound legit to me...

    1. Re:Forgive me by VivianC · · Score: 3, Funny
      The people of Afghanistan don't have televisions, they don't have music, and they don't have telephones... but they have e-mail access one day after the Northern Alliance "liberates" the city?

      Not that this doesn't sound a bit fishy to me as well, but I'd like to point out a couple things about Kabul that you may have missed:
      • Within 24 hours of the Taliban retreat, the city had news and music radio stations functioning on the air and radios to listen to
      • Within 72 hours, the former Taliban TV station was back on the air with a female news anchor and programs on tape from around the world

      These people may not have much, but they do seem to have a fair share of electronics.
      --
      Viv

      Gmail invites for ip
  23. No wonder America is viewed as corrupt by devphil · · Score: 4, Insightful


    So the top three TV shows mentioned in the story ("acutely missed" is the phrase connected to one of them) are Baywatch, Survivor, and Temptation Island?

    Three shows based on the concept of manly men frolicking with scantily-clad women, and in the latter two, premised on the assumption that all humans are conniving backstabbers, and that relationships cannot last in the face of lust, respectively.

    And we're trying to convince the Middle East that America is a just and moral nation? Ya ha ha, whatever.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:No wonder America is viewed as corrupt by Kengineer · · Score: 1

      Hey, they don't HAVE to watch those three shows in particular. I don't. They can watch the Hughlies or Weakest Link or the emotionally uplifting stories featured on Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel. We give them what they want, it's not OUR fault if they want to see scantily clad frolicing and what not.

    2. Re:No wonder America is viewed as corrupt by Brother+Larry · · Score: 1

      Maybe you forget that the majority of Americans ARE like that.

    3. Re:No wonder America is viewed as corrupt by Fishstick · · Score: 2

      Not to mention the fact that, even if they aren't like that, that they view that sort of behavior as compelling entertainment says something about Americans, too.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    4. Re:No wonder America is viewed as corrupt by wytcld · · Score: 3, Insightful
      the concept of manly men frolicking with scantily-clad women

      Hey, that is the Muslim heaven - the central concept that's been used to sell martyrdom to the religion. If we can't offer them at least this much, and on this earth rather then some future realm, we can't even begin to compete. Wait, we are offerring them this!

      It may be crass, but it's a lot more just and moral than getting them so frustrated in this world that they kill for the false promise of the next one. Yeah, I hate those shows too ... but we win if we convince them we're more fun, as well as swing a mean sword of justice. You never win at the "morality" game, since morality is always defined by retrograde local religions, there as here.

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    5. Re:No wonder America is viewed as corrupt by Tonytheloony · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would like to know in what way those shows are "immoral" or not "just" ?

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
    6. Re:No wonder America is viewed as corrupt by mobiGeek · · Score: 1
      Hey, that is the Muslim heaven

      Would you care to elaborate, or are you simply a Troll?

      --

      ...Beware the IDEs of Microsoft...

    7. Re:No wonder America is viewed as corrupt by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      Just be glad that he didn't say Ricky Lake, Jenny Jones and Jerry Springer...

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    8. Re:No wonder America is viewed as corrupt by phaze3000 · · Score: 2
      In the Muslim concept of heaven you can have as much sex as you want, drink as much alcahol and take as many drugs as you want, even eat bacon. At least if you're a man - there's no heaven for women.

      This was explained by me by an atheist friend (whose parents were from Pakistan) - he did provide examples in the Koran..

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    9. Re:No wonder America is viewed as corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Bush laughed while Washington burned.

    10. Re:No wonder America is viewed as corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sooooo glad that I don't have access to any broadcast or cable TV.

    11. Re:No wonder America is viewed as corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are these secret Americans I keep hearing about? I live in America, and I hear that everypone watches obscure TV shows like Survivor and 24% of Americans think that the vice-president's name is Mondale, and 71% of Americans don't know what six times nine is, but I'll be darned if I ever met any of 'em.

      Every time I hear about what Americans are supposedly like, I get this weird feeling that the America that people are talking about, isn't located in America.

  24. Snopes.com by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else smell hoax? Propaganda?

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  25. What is the afghan's people perception? by deragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    You failed to ask the most important questions! ;)

    What is the perception of the afghan's people about the US intervention? Do they feel that the sacrifice of innocents (accidents/mistakes on US forces part, but none less deadly) justify their new freedom? Do they feel that westerners should continue to use force to try to democratize Afghanistan? Or should the coalition now leave from their point of view?

    I saw on TV an Afghan who lost 8 members of his family to US bombs. Yet, he had one message for the US forces: aim better. He did not asked to stop. Others though were very angry against the US after loosing some family member.

    I want to know what the people of Afghanistan wants. I see some demonstrations in western countries asking for the bombings to stop. I say, that we might at least hear what the Afghan have to say. If they believe that the bombings are worthwhile, who are we to ask to stop these actions?

    BTW, have you some websites/forums to suggest where we could directly interact with Afghanistan people? I would really like to have a few exchanges with some of them.

    --
    Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
    1. Re:What is the afghan's people perception? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>"BTW, have you some websites/forums to suggest where we could directly interact with Afghanistan people? I would really like to have a few exchanges with some of them."

      Slashdot is full of dollops. Most of the Afghans do not have computers. Most of them have no electricity. This was probably a hoax and Katz ate it up and so did you.

    2. Re:What is the afghan's people perception? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least the most respected Womens Rights organisation in Aphganistan condemn the bombings. And they _hate_ the taliban (and the Northern Alliance).

      www.rawa.org

    3. Re:What is the afghan's people perception? by W.Mandamus · · Score: 1

      I get the feeling what the afghan people want most right now is to execute forign taliban members on sight.

    4. Re:What is the afghan's people perception? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you can directly communicate with people from Afghanistan here, but www.rawa.org is the website of the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan, and provides the views of at least some Afghans. They are very anti-Taliban, and seem to be anti-Northern Alliance, as well.

    5. Re:What is the afghan's people perception? by psych031337 · · Score: 2

      I can totally why this post got 5 modpoints. I absolutely cannot understand why it was labelled "Funny".

      --
      +++ath0
  26. maybe too fast by archen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I hope that things don't move too fast in Afghanistan. It's easy to sit here in the west and think this is all fine and dandy, but if this all gets pushed in too fast it could end up being culture shock to a lot of people, and potentially generate more fundamentalist extremists (who would of course be anti-american). Afghanistan needs to change, but it needs to do it slowly. It needs to find that middle ground that most of the people will find socially acceptable.

    1. Re:maybe too fast by night_flyer · · Score: 2

      change too fast? the majority of the Afghan population just wants food! (or was the US dropping computers w/ modems instead of food in those crates?)

      Afghanistan is among the world's poorest countries and has the lowest per-person food intake in the world

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    2. Re:maybe too fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree completely. We want them to have the freedom to sustain their own culture. We shouldn't confuse that with imposing or applying our own culture to them.

      American porn is hardly what Afghanistan needs right now. Let's hope that they are careful not only to avoid creating new extremist sects, but to avoid some sense of muslim guilt that might come with abandoning real Koranic teachings along with the twisted Taliban interpretations.

      Be careful, Afghanistan, to remain yourselves.

    3. Re:maybe too fast by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Afghanistan used to be quite modern, as far as freedoms and technology went. Women were in universities and holding civil service jobs; televisions and computers were used; things were pretty cool, given the tribal political system they had.

      I don't think "culture shock" is something to worry about. They had culture, the Taliban killed it, the Taliban is gone, the previous levels of culture (and more) will come back.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  27. External constraints by DaoudaW · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For better or for worse, this once again proves that once Pandora's box is open you can't shut it, no matter how hard you try.

    Having lived in Africa, I've seen firsthand how quickly, frighteningly so, things can change during a coup d'etat. People whose constraints have been mostly external for some time, lose control very quickly when those constraints are lifted, but within a few days things settle down and they regain their internal control/balance.

  28. Answer some questions? by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps we can get this guy from kabul to answer some questions for us?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  29. Baywatch by Xenu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What's the deal with Baywatch? It seems to be extremely popular outside the United States, even though it gets mediocre ratings in the United States.

    1. Re:Baywatch by Heywood+Yabuzof · · Score: 1


      My guess is that it has something to do with the international consipiracy to prolong the career of David Hasselhoff (see also: singing career, Germany, etc.)

      OTOH, maybe people just like to watch hot babes running around in bathing suits :-)

    2. Re:Baywatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they haven't seen this picture of Pamela:
      http://www.catty.f2s.com/beautifulpeople.html [Not Pr0n]

    3. Re:Baywatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proof the world is full of masturbating geeks.

  30. Sooo. by wiredog · · Score: 2
    You don't believe that the French Resistance was able to hide weapons and radios from the Nazis, either? Or perhaps that the Nazi's weren't that oppressive after all?

    Good thing I don't give a damn about karma.

    1. Re:Sooo. by caseydk · · Score: 1
      wow..

      having email just days afterwards is impressive... i didn't know they had AOL (afghanistan online) available there... and I think these people getting Ipods or the like is fairly unlikely...

      How many months of earnings is that for them?

    2. Re:Sooo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that was reference, but my mind is a total blank as to the source right now... someone who gets it please explain and mod it up! +2 funny!

  31. holes in katz's story: by turbine216 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    a few things that REALLY make me think that Katz either made this crap up, or is the victim of a VERY poorly fabricated hoax:

    1 - I know it's been said already, but it bears repeating...how does one download MOVIES on an "ancient commodore"? And furthermore, how does one play them?

    2 - When you're living in Afghanistan, who do you call to get internet access?

    3 - If the guy's using that "ancient commodore", what would prompt him to salivate over an IPod? First of all, it's doubtful that he would have ever acquired even a single MP3 file, let alone enough to fill an IPod. Oh, and Commodores didn't have firewire back in my day. Seems like the guy would be more likely to lust after a 2-year old Athlon system and a broadband connection rather than an IPod.

    I'm sure I'm not the only one who noticed this pile of absolute rubbish. Katz should be sent over to Kabul to investigate the situation himself.

    1. Re:holes in katz's story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      2 - When you're living in Afghanistan, who do you call to get internet access?

      Maybe he was connecting to the internet through RFC 1149 - IP over Avian Carrier.
    2. Re:holes in katz's story: by TheMCP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, where the heck is this guy getting the bandwidth to download movies? A movie in DIVX format is about 600 megs and requires a pretty hefty processor to play (better than anything commodore would have made). Other formats, even if done at lower resolution and less intensive on the processor, would be less compressed so a movie would still be pretty big.

      Bluntly, 90 minutes of video was no laughing matter to try and get onto a computer five or six years ago, the general technology level of the best stuff in afghanistan citizens' hands today.

      Rather than drooling over an iPod, I would expect they would be amazed that such large disks are sold at consumer prices, let alone for stick-it-in-your-pocket-and-go use. I wonder if any "ancient commodore" model can even address such a large disk.

      No, I agree with the posters that think there's something very odd about this story. I think I'll take it with a grain of salt, like the rock of gibraltar.

      I think it's a very pretty story to think "Oh, we freed the Afghanis, now the first thing they're doing is rushing to be just like us," but given the details it strikes me a lot more like propaganda than reality.

    3. Re:holes in katz's story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic? What idiot moderated this parent as offtopic!

    4. Re:holes in katz's story: by Compton+Q.+Groundhog · · Score: 1

      With a CMD hard drive (like the one attached to my Commodore 128), up to 4gb of SCSI goodness can be used. When the new HD-DOS is complete, that number should be much higher.

  32. As a separate point against this entire letter... by Cutriss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Didn't the Taliban STRICTLY regulate technology? The Taliban thought the Internet was evil, after all, and outlawed it. So I find it HIGHLY suspicious that someone managed to start up an ISP in the middle of this war, and that someone else out there is more concerned about getting on Slashdot than staying alive and eating, which is what 99% of the Afghani population is probably concerned with.

    This was bullshit. Sorry, but it *can't* be legit.

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
  33. Did he send a picture too? by FortKnox · · Score: 2

    Perhaps this "Afghani" sent you a picture he got, too, right? It looks like this, right?

    I tell my mother when she gets emails like the one you have, katz, is to first check snopes, then check the local news (if it isn't on the news, then it isn't real, usually).

    Think about it. A computer geek in afghanastan finally gets his computer (commodore, mind you), and whats one of the first people he emails? Jon Katz? Hmmm....

    Sorry, but I'm waaay to skeptic for this (and I'm religious...)

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  34. Slasdot is globalization... by Andreas+Rueckert · · Score: 1

    Just recently there was this posting on globalization and I posted that /. means globalization, since it brings people from around the world together. Now I read that /. story on this guy from Afghanistan, while a few minutes away, airlifters start for their 24h trip to bring food to Afghanistan.

  35. Global Village Returns... by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It was in the 70's that the term "Global Village" was coined, refering mostly to satelite news media and its ilk. Today's technologies make it cheap and simple enough for everyone to develop their own content without having to pay for a whole bureau for Reuters or BBC in every hamlet. Not only do we see this information revolution fueling the Tienamen Sqaure revolt with FAX machines, but also driving police reform in the States with camcorders showing Rodney King's beating.

    I'd never really thought of it before seeing this post, but the one common factor you always hear small town residents use to describe their lives is "Everyone Knows Everyone." I'm probably being a pollyana here, but I believe that the "Global Village" is doing the same thing, helping people throughout the world understand (and hopefully get along) with each other.

    I had a grandfather who went to West Point and served with distinction in the U.S. Army in WWII. A good, honorable man in many ways, but also a bigot down to his bones. I can't help but wonder what sort of man he'dve been if he could've clicked on a website growing up and learned how people live in Saudi Arabia or Tokyo or even just the "wrong side of the tracks" in his hometown.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

    1. Re:Global Village Returns... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2


      I had a grandfather who went to West Point and served with distinction in the U.S. Army in WWII. A good, honorable man in many ways, but also a bigot down to his bones. I can't help but wonder what sort of man he'dve been if he could've clicked on a website growing up and learned how people live in Saudi Arabia or Tokyo or even just the "wrong side of the tracks" in his hometown.

      He wouldn't have been able to serve with distinction because there's no xenophobia to tap into to produce the rage that a good combat soldier needs.

  36. What the people want... by thekernel32 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Despite the many technical questions this has already raised (movies on ancient computers). I see that this is a fine example for how a government can not retain control of a people if it is not representing their interests. It is especially helpful to remember this anytime I see the US Gov leaders doing things I didn't want them to do when I voted. People will be free, and they can have what they want once they work out what that is and seek it as a group.

  37. Hello Mr. Katz ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Wester/US music was never illegal in the GDR.
    You couldn't buy it in stores, but there were a lots of other things you couldn't buy in stores, sometimes even toilet paper.
    Pupils where playing Western music on school excursions and no teachers objected.

    It was in the 60 illegal to watch Western TV but this was stopped in the 70ies.
    However admitting it openly later might have called on the STASI, but only hardcore communists would not watch Western TV.
    And this was mainly because of the NEWS and INFORMATION and not entertainment crap.
    In this respect, I suppose your stuff here would have been allowed to read in the GDR.

    1. Re:Hello Mr. Katz ! by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that the regime in GDR was more relaxed compared with the Soviet Union, or certain Balkan countries. Culturally, Germany remained one nation, and thus the citizens of East Germany had liberties which would have been unthinkable in other parts of the Soviet Bloc, even throughout the 1980s.

    2. Re:Hello Mr. Katz ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it? Try telling that to the folk the Stasi would throw live into blast furnaces while their friends and family watched.

      Oh and the GDR used the SECAM TV system so it was not possible to pick up West German TV with the sets you could buy in East German shops.

  38. WHOA! by niekze · · Score: 3, Funny

    I got an e-mail from Timmy-bin Hashareef. He has cancer of the appendix. It said for every time you forwarded his e-mail, the Afghanistan chapter of the American Appendix Society would donate little Timmy 3 cents and a camel. It also said that if you didn't forward the e-mail, you would get beaten by the Taliban. SEND OUT THE WORD KATZ! THIS IS 274% TRUE!

    haha I want a pink slip with Katz's name on it for Christmas.

    --


    Chaos, Mayhem, and Destruction: Not
    1. Re:WHOA! by IcebergSlim · · Score: 1



      Hahahaha......someone should really mod the above post up......Much more entertaining than the obviously bogus fable which is responsible for this hopeless thread.....

  39. And here's the e-mail that Katz received: by red_dragon · · Score: 1

    Hi! How are you?

    I send you this file in order to have your advice!

    See you later. Praise Allah!

    Well, it could be.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    1. Re:And here's the e-mail that Katz received: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that was funny! BTW at least he wasn't using a microsoft product....

  40. I can't resist... by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

    A decade ago, when East Berlin teenagers stormed the Wall and crossed over into West Berlin, the first thing many of them did was rush to music stores to buy tapes and CD's they'd been secretly, illegally listening to for years. Oh, ya right! Thats like saying napster fans rushed to buy cds in stores once the cd was officially released, even though they had been listening to it 'illegally' for weeks before... HA!

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
  41. Jalalabad! by BoarderPhreak · · Score: 0

    Sorry... Just wanted to say "Jalalabad!" :-D

    1. Re:Jalalabad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting AC out of pure embarassment. My sister, wife and I like to come up with silly homonyms to use in everyday speech, and also use them for animal names, ie:

      Citgo = sicko
      black-eyed peas = black guy pees

      and the cats names we already use, or plan to use in the future include

      Chairman Mao Tse Tung = Chairman Mousey Tongue
      Margaret Thatcher = Margaret Catcher
      Benjamin Netanyahou = Benjamin Net in Yahoo!
      Yassir Arafat = Yassir That's My Cat

      The best we've been able to come up with so far for this conflict is the new captial of Pakistan:

      Islamabad = His Llama's Bad

  42. Not that it really matters but... by smoondog · · Score: 2
    As a few others have said before me, I too think this email is a fake. Although there are only a few places in this email that are likely wrong (dl'ing vids on a commodore) many others are highly suspect. My personal favorites are:
    • he'd kept his own decaying poster of Madonna I'm sure all Afghani's love like a virgin
    • He says other coders and gamers hid their PC's as well. The underground geek network in a third world country devastated by war!
    • Junis predicts "Temptation Island" will be the number one show in Afghanistan within a month. I suspected Rupert Murdoch was helping rebuild!
    • hiding spots to dig up their Walkmen, VCRs, TVs, CD players I buried my commodore, too.

    It really comes down to this. This email is suspect because it is written in a very american perspective and anybody who has traveled extensively outside of the US knows that most of the world doesn't work or think this way. I feel this person would be just simply unable to gain the ideology expressed here. But on the other hand, I could be wrong.... -Sean

    1. Re:Not that it really matters but... by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      >I too think this email is a fake

      What email? Katz doesn't provide any email (or even excerpts). All we get is Jon's story about getting an email.

      Would be nice if we could see this email. Judge for ourselves how 'authentic' it is or isn't.

    2. Re:Not that it really matters but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would mean that Slashdot would have some accountability as a media agent. Sadly, they get trolled often because they never fact check. They barely check their links as is. I do enjoy coming here, but it's frustrating as anything to keep having repeated stories (why don't editors get marked redundant?) posted, and crap stories like this appearing. I was happy to begin with too, but this is an american hoaxing katz, and making Slashdot look bad in the process. Is professionalism too much to ask?

      Are these not legitimate concerns?

      Chao

    3. Re:Not that it really matters but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they are legitimate concerns. You've pointed out weaknesses in the slashdot "machine" that have been pointed out for what must be over a year now. These are things that the slashdot team have to be aware of. They are choosing to ignore them and not fix them.

      Lets say that again so you dont miss it:

      They are choosing not to fix these issues.

      I don't know if their passion for this site has been crushed by the corporation or what, but some of these points would not take much extra time each day and yet they haven't been implemented. Slashdot is not listening to its users, not looking to us for ways to improve, and it is becoming increasingly obvious that the users don't matter.

      I, for one, am very disappointed with how things have turned out.

    4. Re:Not that it really matters but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They are choosing not to fix these issues."

      Most of them are choosing not to fix the issues. I truly believe that Taco and Homos are aware of what is going on and allow it to happen. You'll occasionally see a new guy like Jaime pop into a conversation and express genuine interest in being able to fix what is broke. Unfortunately, he reverts into that Tacoesque cynacism that these guys think are so cool, and ends up alienating the constituency. I saw him drive off two real and dedicated in users in one thread. They truly believe that anyone critical of /. is trolling.

      A year and a half ago when the Trolls (Namely the one's that moved to Adequacy) kept a Trolltalk sig, they talked about how "Timothy was the nice one." Try talking to him now and I don't think you would come to the same conclusion.

      "I don't know if their passion for this site has been crushed by the corporation or what, but some of these points would not take much extra time each day and yet they haven't been implemented. Slashdot is not listening to its users, not looking to us for ways to improve, and it is becoming increasingly obvious that the users don't matter. "

      I think your conclusion is definately true. On the rare case when Taco posts a rant, its of the affect "I could have done something about X, but I chose not to." Yeah right Taco. Its hard adjusting to being an employee isn't it.
      Nevertheless, I don't really think Taco every cared about the users. Even three years ago, the FAQ's were full of egoism, "I post things I like;" "Get over it."

      What Taco never realized was that no one ever really gave a damn about his interests. The /. of old was popular b/c the people involved with the tech would post, often giving inside information. The /. of today is popular b/c extremists and fanatics can come here and scream and get some me too hugs.

      The editors of /. have no real skills that would draw anyone to this site (unless you consider web programming with perl a skill).

      Very soon, VA will likely close /. b/c the current constituency will not generate any ad revenue. Malda will be pissed and post a final rant. Another company will hire him and market that he was the creator of /. The site will not generate traffic and Malda will be forever grumpy thinking that people abondaned him.

      Well Malda if you venture in to read comments, especially comments at 0 or -1, remember this. When your dot com dream goes kaput, , remember every "get over it" you ever uttered, remember every "its what I like" and remember how many people gave you constructive criticism that you chose to ignore.

  43. It's not that simple by Eloquence · · Score: 2
    As others have pointed out, the e-mail is very likely to be fake. I see another problem with the article.

    When his message came, the Taliban had just fled, Northern Alliance soldiers had taken over his village, and everybody rushed to barbers to cut off their beards and to nearby holes and hiding spots to dig up their Walkmen, VCRs, TVs, CD players, and -- in Junis's case -- his ancient Commodore, one of four in the village. Cafes had popped up all over, with impromptu dances and parties everywhere

    Surely life has improved tremendously in the few days since the Taliban left Kabul. And certainly many people are enjoying new (old) freedoms. However, your description is a gross exaggeration -- "everybody", "everywhere". Resistance groups like the RAWA have already expressed concern that life under groups like the Northern Alliance will be like life in Afghanistan was in the years before 1996 -- still brutal and repressive, just not in the extreme. While the picture of people shaving their forced beards off in masses or playing music and partying is certainly relieving, it is contrasted by a reality of executions/murders and, likely, rape. (Also, to be sure, many people are quite happy with their beards and appreciated the censorship and repression by the Taliban, much like many Germans supported the nazis completely.) Save the picture of "liberated Afghanistan" for the day when Afghanistan is actually liberal.

    Fortunately, the US government seems to be pushing for a secular Afghanistan, but do not be satisfied just because the Taliban are going into guerilla mode. The Northern Alliance are merely the lesser evil.

    1. Re:It's not that simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The United States doesn't have a truer friend than the Northern Alliance.

    2. Re:It's not that simple by dragons_flight · · Score: 2

      Fortunately, the US government seems to be pushing for a secular Afghanistan, but do not be satisfied just because the Taliban are going into guerilla mode.

      The US is pushing an ethnically diverse Afghanistan sure, but I would be truely surprised if it became a secular country. Except for some Sikhs, nearly everyone will declare that they are Muslim, just not the Taliban interpretation of Islam. I wouldn't hold my breath for seperation of church and state in that environment. But, plenty of countries have nationally supported religions and we are even relatively friendly with some Islamic states.

  44. I'm sorry but by bribecka · · Score: 2

    If I lived under the Taliban for 5 years and finally got back a net connection, emailing JonKatz wouldn't be on the top of my list. Maybe the Taliban really messed with his mind...

    --

    Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?

    1. Re:I'm sorry but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must have been the head wound from all those beatings...

  45. Why don't people think this can be done by t0qer · · Score: 1

    On a commodore? TCP/IP stacks have existed for the 8-bit systems for years.

    Linux for commordores.
    http://hld.c64.org/poldi/lunix/lunix.html

    Instructions for getting it to work
    http://cbm.videocam.net.au/chapter18.php

    Maybe if it had been an Atari it would have been more credable. POWER WITHOUT THE PRICE OH YEAH!

  46. This is a Terrifying Reminder by ksw2 · · Score: 1
    This is another terrifying reminder that Jon Katz is free to comment on potentially thousands of forwarded emails, from all over the world.

    It is a chilling, sober reality that we all must face.

  47. Is JohnKatz this gullible? by weez75 · · Score: 1

    I have a hard time believing this story. Most of you probably feel the same way. While Slashdot isn't a primary news provider like CNN it is considered by many of us a place to get information. Now, how in the world can I be expected to believe anything Mr. Katz has to say after this? His reputation is shot...

    --
    Of course we torture people, we need the information --Gen. Pinochet
    1. Re:Is JohnKatz this gullible? by Eugene+O'Neil · · Score: 1

      As for me, I consider stories on slashdot only to be as reputable as the "real" news site the stories link to.

    2. Re:Is JohnKatz this gullible? by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 1

      Maybe this story was "metaphorical." Perhaps in the future, budding authors should surround their metaphorical musings with a disclaimer: CAUTION! CAUTION! CAUTION! METAPHORS AHEAD!

      I have forgotten how to do the Netscape blink tags. Oh well.

    3. Re:Is JohnKatz this gullible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually compared to CNN, Katz should be given a prize.

      CNN is the biggest trash I have ever seen. I have seen their coverage of my Contry, the Computer industry and other things that I know a little more about then a layman. I find CNN to be entirely inaccurate

    4. Re:Is JohnKatz this gullible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But slashdot is _News for Nerds_.

      Maybe katz has more of a clue than CNN, I can concede that. But as the news outlet for nerds he should be held to standards that we can be content with. Think about those who visit slashdot just to see what the nerds think...

      I do not want this idiot as my voice when he can't even apply a basic smell test to an email he's going to write a whole column about.

  48. You're being way too soft on Katz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is all this crap with "aww it's a hoax Katz but thanks for the warm n fuzzy sentiments"..? Why is no one tearing him apart for publishing such an obvious pack of lies under the guise of a news piece? Perhaps you're all taking pity on him for being too daft to recognize a hoax email? But if you ask me he can't be THAT thick, he just simply made up a nice little flag-waver for you all.

    1. Re:You're being way too soft on Katz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As it is obvious by his last name!!

  49. Gotcha.... by MosesJones · · Score: 2


    For godsake this sounds like the most hockum hooey I've heard in a long time. "Independence Day" as a movie to rent. Lets get this straight

    30miles outside of Kabul there is a video shop (lets pretend that one is reasonable) which saved its copies of "Independence Day" which it was renting to an audience which in the vast majority of cases doesn't speak english.

    Hokum, baloney and rubbish. This sounds about as likely as a lead balloon circumnavigating the globe. I've read some vomit inducing stuff here from Katz but this takes the biscuit. Quite simply unadulterated rubbish. Movies on a commadore, what browser is our Afghan friend using and what player ?

    You've been had Katz by one of the most transparent hoaxes I've ever seen.

    I have bridges you might want to buy.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  50. Should we believe you? by Kryptkrwlr_XTC · · Score: 1

    Mr. Katz, Your story sounds to me as if you had just watched a heart-warming holiday film and decided to right this fascade about the little geek that got his Christmas wish ( if he celebrated Christmas ). His country has been in utter turmoil in for the better part of 20 years. between civil war, the US and Russia invading and reducing most of the country to rubble. A zealotous government. Do you really think we are dumb enough to believe that this country still has the infrastructure and resources to: A) provide unlimited phone/DSL/cable/satellite ISP services to the masses ( most people I know outside of the US and Canada pay by the minute for dial-up service) B) physical infrastructure in the form of servers, cable/phone/fiber to allow public use outside of relief and military operations. C) these people could actually pay for these services after housing clothing and feeding their families. ( last time I checked I couldn't barter goats for bandwidth) D) You can't watch movies on a commodore (640k hard disk?) or even cache a image heavy pron site E) Just STFU and save your stories for your kids Katz

  51. Re:As a separate point against this entire letter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember Young ones. E-mail dosen't require direct internet access. People we exchanging e-mail over fido-net and USENET years before the internet was really accessable.

  52. I just recieved this in my email, is it true? by night_flyer · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Hi All -
    I think you all know that I don't send out hoaxes and don't do the reactionary thing and send out anything that crosses my path. This one, however, is a friend of a friend and I've given it enough credibility in my mind that I'm writing it up and sending it out to all of you.
    My friend's friend was dating a guy from Afghanistan up until a month ago. She had a date with him around 9/6 and was stood up. She was understandably upset and went to his home to find it completely emptied. On 9/10, she received a letter from her boyfriend explaining that he wished he could tell her why he had left and that he was sorry it had to be like that. The part worth mentioning is that he BEGGED her not to get on any commercial airlines on 9/11 and to not to go any malls on Halloween. As soon as everything happened on the 11th, she called the FBI and has since turned over the letter.

    This is not an email that I've received and decided to pass on. This came from a phone conversation with a long-time friend of mine last night.

    I may be wrong, and I hope I am. However, with one of his warnings being correct and devastating, I'm not willing to take the chance on the second and wanted to make sure that people I cared about had the same information that I did.

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:I just recieved this in my email, is it true? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes it IS true Mr. Stienberg
      Lay off with the propaganda

    2. Re:I just recieved this in my email, is it true? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a complete hoax. See Snopes.com

    3. Re:I just recieved this in my email, is it true? by night_flyer · · Score: 2

      Ummm DUH!, its a hoax, JUST LIKE THIS ONE IS... and yet I get moderated as "off-topic"... its laughable...

      News for Nerds? try Krap for Kiddies

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    4. Re:I just recieved this in my email, is it true? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I recieved the very same thing! We must have the same friends, where do you live?

    5. Re:I just recieved this in my email, is it true? by night_flyer · · Score: 2

      Just like the guy in the story, I am curently typing in the dark without a Phone Line, Power or Food in the middle of Afghanistan! its amazing what this little commadore can do after being burried in chickenshit for the last 5 years!

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  53. Questions by cascino · · Score: 1

    I was a little surprised last week to receive a forwarded e-mail from Junis, who lives in a small town 35 miles southwest of Kabul.

    I have two questions for Katz:

    1. Since when have forwarded e-mails been reliable journalistic sources?

    2. Doesn't this sound suspiciously like the beginning of a "[name] is dying of cancer, will receive [amount of money] for every time this e-mail is forwarded" chain letter?

    At least the poor kid didn't try and set up a website. Hehe... his Commodore would quickly learn the meaning of the phrase "/. effect."

  54. Helping Freedom by BankofAmerica_ATM · · Score: 0

    Hello, I read your article and I think maybe the Taliban is defeat if they have things like me. I am a Bank of America ATM, and I haven't seen anything but the Stop N Go where I live for the past two years. If you need me to go fight for America and freedom with convenient locations and no fees (Bank of America cardholders only), then please take me to Aghanistan. I will do my part. Please, I am tired of the store. The boy who works here doesn't talk to me, and those skater kids are always leaning on me.

  55. I am doubting this is real.... by abolith · · Score: 1

    I have kept upon the "WAR" alot since its beginningand there are about Five Telephone lines that are of high enough quality to support internet service coming in to afgan, all from pakistan. even the service providers are in pakistan. the odds that this guy was able to hookup to an ISP within mere minutes,or hours after the Taliban left are about next to zero. Not that i am saying it couldn't happen just so damn unlikly that it is unbelivable, I mean really guys, stop and look around at who is posting this story......
    not to mention that all the phone lines and other basic infastructure have been pounded for years, by first the soviets, than the Tech hating Taliban, followed by the US. I truly doubt there is anything beyond basic power left.....However I do acknowlage that I could be wrong, and if I am good for the Afgans. but I don't think so.

    --
    if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
  56. No, John got it wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I use a Pentium III laptop a US special forces team lost when they were fleeing from Bin Laden as he tried to ass rape them because you must know he is very horny and homosexual.
    I did hide the laptop in to commodore because commodore where allowed by the taliban because commodore are no real computer.
    The teams also lost some satellite phone I use know to download an Episode I div-X.
    Very good the cell phone is because it is very fast.
    However I must soon try to get new laptop because old keyboard is soon broke because I always drool and have seizure when I see appel website so drool gets locked up in keybord and the -key is not working any more.

  57. Wrong, or just an exception to every rule? by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 2
    Passion for pop culture relentlessly undermined repressive governments like Poland, East Germany and the former Soviet Union.

    Okay.
    But could someone please explain to me about communist China?

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    1. Re:Wrong, or just an exception to every rule? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      could someone please explain to me about communist China?

      China has really mellowed out since Mao died, and the only thing they try to censor is anti-government stuff. And on top of that china now has it's own pop-culture that while sharing traits with western pop-culture, is largely independent.

      China is also gradually becoming more capitalistic.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    2. Re:Wrong, or just an exception to every rule? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that you over estimate the role that the pop-culture played in freeing Poland. We have been fighting and resisting communism for fifty years and that is what has finally killed it, not the pop-culture in the "West". Please do not underestimate the sacrifices that Polish society has made in fighting with communism, it is not your achievement but ours.

  58. Un-buh-leev-able by hubbabubba · · Score: 1

    Yeah right. So what does this guy do, call over to Pakistan to connect to an ISP? I don't believe it. Between destroyed telecom infrastructure and insanely high international LD rates even if you COULD make a call, it just doesn't sound credible. Downloading and watching movies on a Commodore? Balooooooney. The rest of the details sound way too contrived and "convenient" to be the real deal. Show us the email headers, Katz. I want to know how you determined that it went from Kabul to Islamabad to London to you. This sounds like a crock.

    --
    Fried ice cream is a reality. - George Clinton
  59. Suspicion by Tony · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I am rather suspicious of the whole thing, too. As Eddy Izzard says, "The infrastructure's fucked." (God: "Oh? Well, have some jam. And here's a radiator.")

    It looks like Katz is the butt of someone's joke. Without some backing evidence (such as complete mail headers showing routes, and evidence that the headers aren't forged), I consider this a kremvax.

    But that's just my opinion. I could be wrong.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  60. Apology? Retraction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I mean really - I for one would like to see Katz own up to this one and issue an apology for passing it off as real. Who else feels the same way?

    1. Re:Apology? Retraction? by ska187 · · Score: 1

      Hell yes. Either put up or shut up Katz. While no one should ever claim that SLashdot is a legitimate news source you damn well better try to keep the propaganda down to a minimum. I for one am sick of the nonstop superimposed pictures of Osama in various and sundry sexually improper poses with goats. This supposed true email is just as vile, just as humorless, and just as wrong as anything I've seen.

      --
      "Science Explores, Technology Executes, Man Conforms." -1929 Worlds' Fair
  61. This is absolute tripe by ska187 · · Score: 1

    OHH Yeah...Slashdot and open source are his favorite things. You sir are a liar.

    --
    "Science Explores, Technology Executes, Man Conforms." -1929 Worlds' Fair
  62. burying stuff by vortigern00 · · Score: 1

    Burying the stuff that represents your freedom.

    Yep, I will be burying my guns as soon as the anti-constitutional anti-gun lobby succeeds.

    They will wait for me until the oppressive regime is over.

  63. He just dug it up huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1


    "I could still see the dust of the pick-up trucks carrying the Taliban out of my village," he wrote, "and some friends and I went and dug up the boards of a chicken coop where I had hid the computer. They might have beaten or killed us if they'd found it. It was forbidden, although they used computers all of the time."


    Just got right back to business when the Taliban left huh?

    Kinda reminds me of the Saturday Night Live episode where the white people on the bus immediately started back their party as soon as the black dude left. :)

    Hey Mohamed, the Taliban is gone, wanna play some pong? Sure Ashwan, let me just dig up my commodore.

  64. Yeah, it was for his school project. by gosand · · Score: 5, Funny
    ROTFL.

    Hi, my name is Junis. I live in a town 35 miles from Kabul in Afganistan. I am doing a school project to see how many people can read an email in 30 days. Please forward this to everyone you know, and keep the headers intact.

    Thank you, your pal,
    Junis

    P.S. I really like Jon Katz, he is great.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  65. ipod by st|ng-x · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If he is using a Commodore, obviously money is not freely flowing out of his pockets. Then it states "Meanwhile, he's especially eager to get his hands on the Apple iPod" ...that ipod is around 300 USD...AND it only works with an Apple computer. You schuur the email you received was legit, Jon?

    --
    So have a good drown as you go down, all alone, dragged down by the stone.
    1. Re:ipod by smoondog · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Besides, according to Numerous sources the average salary in Afghanistan is on the order of $10-20 USD equiv per month.

      I haven't felt this way before, but this is the first article I have really wanted to see withdrawn from slashdot. It scares me that a news orginization with the readership of its magnitude could post this crap.

      -Sean

    2. Re:ipod by telstar · · Score: 1

      He's going from the Commodore to an iPod?
      In the words of Chris Rock ... "Slow Down".

      Let me guess ... next week he'll be firing up his XBOX as a diversion for when he gets bored watching DVDs.

    3. Re:ipod by ska187 · · Score: 1

      This is NOT a news organization. Whoever told you that obvoiously lied to you.

      --
      "Science Explores, Technology Executes, Man Conforms." -1929 Worlds' Fair
    4. Re:ipod by smoondog · · Score: 2

      Uh, I agree /. is not a normal news organization. But they play the part and they are certainly revered as such. Just because they don't have reporters doesn't mean they don't have responsibility to their millions of readers.

    5. Re:ipod by Cutriss · · Score: 2

      Unless you were just being sarcastic, in which case I wholeheartedly agree with you...

      Please read the title underneath the Slashdot logo.News for Nerds. Puh. Yeah, I definitely think the root post here needs some more attention. I agree. Jon Katz's posts have been specious before, but this is just utter bullshit. I call for a retraction and censure.

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    6. Re:ipod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It scares me that a news orginization with the readership of its magnitude could post this crap.

      It scares me that someone would consider Slashdot to be a news organization!

    7. Re:ipod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, it sounds like a troll, but unless there is a real show of demand for a better quality on slashdot it just isn't going to happen.

      1. Does Katz get to just post whatever he wants, or is someone at slashdot proofreading this and asking "how do you watch a movie on a commodore, maybe i should see that original email or you should tell me the whole story"? Evidently not.

      2. Why has it been many many months since multiple postings of the same article began, yet they have done nothing to solve the problem? We have not even seen an _attempt_ to reduce the number, it seems to happen a couple of times a week.

      3. They dropped/will drop soon Kuro5hin because it was not "open source" enough for OSDN anymore. At the same time, slashdot hasn't seen a new wave or focus on open source reporting. In fact, they do the same general interest reporting Kuro5hin does, but with lower article quality.

      It seems as if slashdot has grown stale. The "powers that be" don't seem to focus on the community anymore. They seem to be busy elsewhere, but we never see the results of their work. What happened to the editors who cared for the quality of the site, and weren't just doing it as a paying job.

    8. Re:ipod by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      They dropped/will drop soon Kuro5hin because it was not "open source" enough for OSDN anymore. At the same time, slashdot hasn't seen a new wave or focus on open source reporting. In fact, they do the same general interest reporting Kuro5hin does, but with lower article quality.

      I have to disagree with this. Kuro5hin hardly ever talks about tech these days, with Just Carnage4life holding out (and he gets a lot of his stories posted here these days)

      while it's true slashdot does general and political stories, k5 does them almost exclusively these days.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    9. Re:ipod by istartedi · · Score: 2

      the average salary in Afghanistan is on the order of $10-20 USD equiv per month.

      Whenever you see such stats, you always have to ask some other questions like: "what do things cost?" and "how important is the money economy over there?". Odds are the answers are "not much" and "not very" or some combination thereof.

      If you are a Taliban, you were, until very recently, well fed. The food, weapons, and a little money were coming from outside. A lot of it is black market. Do you think these opium traders with mules loaded down with stash and AK-47s are reporting their incomes to the IMF and the UN, or whoever it is compiles the statistics?

      Well, you know what they say about statistics...

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that life in the 3rd world isn't a turd sandwich. I'm just saying that there is some lettuce on that sandwich we don't see.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    10. Re:ipod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's a misleading statistic. People in Bali, Indonedia, for example, earn $50 (NZ) a month - which would be impossible to live on in New Zealand. But when you go there you see that rice costs a tenth of what it does in New Zealand. Cocacola costs one 16th! A new t-shirt cost me 5000rp (about $1 NZ) and that was tourist prices!

      Sure - the statistic is true. But it's not an indicator of how much they can afford.

    11. Re:ipod by Baldrson · · Score: 2
      this is the first article I have really wanted to see withdrawn from slashdot

      Since this article got pulled, I think it only fair that Katz's article be left out in the open. ;)

  66. Post the email, Jon by image · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We'd all love to read it.

    [mod this up if you agree -- I'm at the cap anyway, so I'm not KW'ing]

    1. Re:Post the email, Jon by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      You're right. If the guy is so enamored of /., he shouldn't have a problem (and should be quite proud) to have his email posted for the world to see.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  67. The relentless pressure... by rodentia · · Score: 2, Funny

    for Dallas and Kojak reruns drove the shipbuilders of Gdansk to the barricades. Katz is our own Mrs. Malaprop.

    --
    illegitimii non ingravare
  68. A real fake post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.cwi.nl/~piet/kremvax.html

  69. China by Arrowhead · · Score: 1

    I'd be interested in a similar success story about China.

    Yes, they have internet. But it's highly regulated and censored.

    Yes, they have foreign TV stations. Who are all too willing to self-censor so as not to offend the government, for which they in turn get the privilege to sell to an audience of a billion people.

    And while you're at it, show us what good technology does in North Korea with respect to human freedom.

  70. Re:As a separate point against this entire letter. by Jburkholder · · Score: 1
    I don't disagree that this story is extremely suspect.

    However, the line of reasoning that the Taliban effectively eliminated internet access the the entire country is possibly incorrect.

    http://isp-lists.isp-planet.com/isp-satellites/0 10 5/msg00044.html


    To: isp-satellites@isp-satellites.com
    X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.3.4.6
    Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 14:42:50 +0000
    Message-ID:
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1256"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

    Hi all,
    We are looking for a provider of Internet and VOIP from the UK, Holland
    , Germany.
    We want to establish Internet connectivity to 3 locations in Iran and
    one in Afghanistan.
    We prefer on KU Band , to use small antennas.
    Please, contact me off line.
    Best Regards,
    Dr. Salim Vareze
    General Manager
    AE Communication Co.
  71. Nice one Katz! by iforgotmyfirstlogon · · Score: 2


    Way to tip off the world to the location of American special forces troops. Their blood is on your hands.

    Idiot.

    - Freed

    --
    "Coffee should be black as hell, strong as death, and sweet as love." -Turkish Proverb
    1. Re:Nice one Katz! by rogueuk · · Score: 1

      as if they didn't already know that US special forces have infiltrated the major cities....i doubt they would expect to see special forces wearing a big badge saying "we're american's". this is not something that is a major revelation.

  72. Thought they are going to get M$? by Geekonomical · · Score: 1

    I was ROFL :-)) I am sure people in Kabul (for that matter in Pakistan or in any of the *stans) don't give a rats ass about FTC getting Microsoft.

    This seems to be somebody's fantasy...

    1. Re:Thought they are going to get M$? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you would be surprised.
      A Mocro$oft hating Pakistani

  73. Forward This To Everyone In Your Address Book!!!! by hubbabubba · · Score: 2, Funny

    >>>>>>>>>Hey Jon, did
    >>>>>>>>>>>the email have
    >>>>>>>>>>a closing line
    >>>>>>>>>kinda like my
    >>>>>>>>>>subject line?

    --
    Fried ice cream is a reality. - George Clinton
  74. Worst article ever... by Cesaro · · Score: 1

    Truly...this was just horrendous. I come here for "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." Not phony crap emails about some afghani hooking up his TRS-80 to download DIVX movies of bouncing breasts in wonderful 80x20 resolution at 10hz with 2 colours. You should be able to mod posts down so I don't even have to see this junk.

  75. what a fantasy world... by SethJohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful


    There's a lot that just doesn't add up in this story. I agree with the other posters that JK has either fabricated this as nerd-porn, or that he's been duped by a troll.

    1. Downloading movies on the 'Commodore' hidden under the chicken coop- What the heck format are the movies in? If they're recent movies, they're not going to be compressed using any codex available to even the last of the Amigas.

    2. He wants to get his hands on an iPod. Right... Isn't that putting the cart before the horse in SO many ways. mp3s are only a hot commodity among people who have a. lots of bandwidth and / or b. lots of cds. This guy has neither. If he has the disposable income (which is so damn rare in an impoverished country like Afghanistan) to want to buy an iPod, then he would have the wherewithall to have fled the country at some point during the Taliban's occupation. The people stuck in Afghanistan during the Taliban's occupation weren't the ones saying, "Damn. I have all this money and no cool stuff to buy." Those people got the hell out of there. I drive a car that cost more than some of the bombs they dropped on the Taliban, but with the economy in the state that it is in the US, I'm not talking about spending the cash to buy an iPod anytime soon.
    1. Re:what a fantasy world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, despite the fact that the article was a flaming pile of twice-digested horse feces...

      An Amiga (of 'classic' vintage) can play 3ivx files. I seem to recall a 68060 was reccommended (only available on accellerator cards), but I have a feeling playback could be tolerable (&GT 1FPS) on an '040, and it just might survive enough to show a Realplayer-on-a-Pentium-75-esque rendition on an '020, for severely small framesizes... We're talking MPEG-4, here, too.

      So yes, it's indeed feasible, although perhaps not altogether practical.

      You're welcome to have a look at Amiga.org or ANN to see some of the latest developments in the Amiga scene- ANN may be worse than JonKatz's postings, but the ATX PPC board is for real, and the lesser-specced, Amiga Inc.-sponsored board just might appear by next July..

  76. Karma Suicide! by FortKnox · · Score: 1

    OK, as already pointed out, this letter is 99.9% likely to be a fake. Jon, either say something, update the article, present proof, or make a retraction!!

    I can't believe that someone working for slashdot would actually believe this stuff.

    Jon, I'm not your biggest supporter, I'll admit, but this is just garbage! Why would you think some kid would single you out, find your email (which isn't easy), and write an email (I'm sure he's using OutLook on his commodore to do it, too).

    Jon, lets stick to nerd topics, and quit milking politics. News for nerds? Funny, I can't think of many nerds that enjoy talking politics. Lets stick to Open Source, Linux, and internet tools like your boss says.

    There goes the karma cap for me....

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  77. Jon, get this guy to write an article! by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    Really, if this guy is for real, get him to write an article about his experiences. See if you can get him a digial camera to take pictures, and some way to get them out of Afganistan. Even if you just give him a way to mail you the disk, it would be worth it.

    The best thing in the world, for the world, is for people there to get their experiences out!

  78. What a load of BS by soulflakes · · Score: 0

    Posting this type of garbage is reprehensible.
    What else to you expect from 'not-check -the-facts-Katz'

    I'm typing this on my Sinclair btw....

  79. "thought they'd 'get microsoft'" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously the consensus on this one is that this story is utter bullshit. I agree.

    Katz states the guy thought they'd "get Microsoft". Presumably this means he had followed early anti-trust news but had subsequently been in the dark because of the Taliban. I don't buy this at ALL.

    The BBC and the Voice of America estimate that 90%+ of Afghanis listen to shortwave and/or mediumwave broadcasts from the West on a regular basis. These people have not been completely in the dark about what happens here.

    A determined "geek" would have easily been able to keep up with news about the anti-trust case, as both the BBC and the VOA broadcast news in English and about 40 other languages, including languages spoken in Afghanistan. At some point, one could have easily picked up a tidbit about the Microsoft case, most likely from an English broadcast listened to first-hand or translated by a friend.

    This story is 100% bullshit.

  80. Haven't they sufferred enough? by nihilogos · · Score: 1

    there's already a lot of talk about "Survivor." Junis predicts "Temptation Island" will be the number one show in Afghanistan within a month.

    --
    :wq
  81. Former corrispondance... by JohnDenver · · Score: 2

    Junis, a computer geek obsessed with Linux, had first e-mailed me years ago while I was writing for Hotwired.

    --
    "Communism is like having one [local] phone company " - Lenny Bruce
  82. Other related issues by Syberghost · · Score: 2

    This shows why it's imperative that the US promote free trade with China and every other nation not actively inimicable to us, and why it's completely unnecessary that we establish a pro-US government in Afghanistan; we merely need to remove the anti-US government and back off. Repeat as necessary.

    If they aren't attacking our people, back off and leave 'em alone. If they are, destroy them, and let their people sort out the relacement themselves.

    The best defense is a lack of enemies. That means don't create enemies, and once you have them, eliminate them.

  83. Printing Porn on the C64 by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

    Maybe I should dig out my Okidata color printer and send it to him so he can print out his porn. Tell him to go easy on that tri-color ribbon, they're probably hard to find now. You can rewind the ribbon and use it a few times to save money if you don't care too much about the quality. Of course, it's extremely slow since the ribbon has repeating 8.5" segments of C, Y, &M, and needs to make three passes per line. But I guess he'll have time enough to print while waiting for the next image to download on his 1200bps modem.

    10 PRINT "THE TALIBAN SUCKS"
    20 GOTO 10
    RUN

    Oh, and did I miss an article about Linux ported to the C64? I haven't been reading the Linux on xbox/ps2/dreamcast/washingmachine/toasteroven posts too carefully.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    1. Re:Printing Porn on the C64 by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2

      Could have been a Commodore AMIGA!! I think you can get online with one of those.

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  84. Don't ask us, ask Amensty International by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back when I ran a chapter of Amnesty International, we would get information about the Taliban all the time. Here's a link to Amnesty's site. I believe you can find info on Afganistan on the front page.

    This is one of those situations when the media doesn't have to make up horror stories.

  85. Follow these instructions by night_flyer · · Score: 4, Informative

    1) click on "Preferences" on the upper right hand of the page

    2) go to the "authors" column, check "JonKatz"

    3) click "submit"

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  86. One small nitpick by LazyDawg · · Score: 3, Funny

    This guy from just outside of Kabul will get another rude, nasty surprise when he figures out that a C64 can't download or play movies from the Internet very well at all. Poor guy, he'll have to wait for them to get released in the video store or something.

    --
    "Look at me, I invented the stove!" -- Ben Franklin
  87. Don't be fooled - CmderTaco aint CmdrTaco by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1

    Take a look at CmderTaco and you will see a lot of -1's. He aint the real CmdrTaco, just an AC with an account.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  88. Mod it up by JohnDenver · · Score: 1

    I agree too...

    --
    "Communism is like having one [local] phone company " - Lenny Bruce
  89. OT note on the war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, this is not entirely on topic, but since the chances of me reading Slashdot when a fresh Afghanistan-related story pops up are really low, I'll post this here:

    I am *exceedingly* surprised at how well the war has gone.

    No, I don't mean on the US-domestic front (what with the Orwellian restrictions and all), but on the physical, actual war area. At the beginning of the bombing campaign I was under the impression that the Afghans were united behind the Taliban, and that an extremely costly and long land campaign involving a siz-figure amount of US troops would be needed to oust bin Laden, but no - a couple of smart bombs, a small number of cruise missiles and a couple of carpet-bombings and *POOF* there goes the Taliban.

    I mean, wow. There has been, what, ZERO American war casualties, and a very small amount of civilian destruction, and most of the country is now in anti-Taliban control. Either I'm totally inept at being a military strategist, or the power of the US military machine is far greater that I imagined. Probably the former, actually - I didn't account for the fact that there *already were* well-motivated, battle-hardened ground troops in the country: all that was needed by the US was some air-to-ground action and the Northern Alliance and other opposition forces got the push they needed to (re)gain control.

    The "Homeland Security" measures are horrible, but man, the old-fashioned war campaign went really well.

    1. Re:OT note on the war by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      I mean, wow. There has been, what, ZERO American war casualties, and a very small amount of civilian destruction,

      Actualy, two US servicemen died in a helicopter crash (in pakistan)

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  90. It can't be that simple....IT CAN'T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) click on "Preferences" on the upper right hand of the page

    2) GOTO 1

  91. Easy on the 'Hoax!' shouts... by Bazman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    John says: "Junis, a computer geek obsessed with Linux, had first e-mailed me years ago while I was writing for Hotwired."

    If you got a random email from someone you've never heard of from a .af domain then yes, you could be suspicious, but if John has known this guy for years then he's in a better position to judge than we are.

    Baz

    1. Re:Easy on the 'Hoax!' shouts... by ska187 · · Score: 1

      HOAX.
      HOAX.
      HOAX.
      HOAX!!!

      It's not how the message arrived that is called into question. It is the content.

      --
      "Science Explores, Technology Executes, Man Conforms." -1929 Worlds' Fair
    2. Re:Easy on the 'Hoax!' shouts... by macrom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But there are just too many things that don't seem to add up :

      1. He and three other villagers had Commodores in hiding (presumably because that's all they could acquire) for 5 years, yet he's a "computer geek obsessed with Linux". Where was he able to get a Linux box and play with it enough to become obsessed?

      2. He's trying to download movies he's missed despite the fact that one minute of a movie is probably larger than the amount of RAM on a Commodore. In addition, is there an OS for any Commodore computer that can play MOV, AVI, MPEG or other movie files? How about VCD images? That would be news to me and a lot of other people here.

      3. American TV has been banned for the reign of the Taliban, as have computers and Internet connections. Yet he can already predict (in the few days he's been browsing the web, presumably) that "Survivor" and "Temptation Island" will be big hits over there. How the hell did he even find out about these shows, let alone learn enough about them to claim that Afghanis will fall in love with them?

      4. iPod was just released, yet he knows he already wants one. Hell, I haven't had the chance to go to the Apple store 5 miles from my house to see if I want one. You would think that the oppression he's been under would drive him (and others) to want a stable food supply and guaranteed shelter before wanting an MP3 player that doesn't interface with a Commodore computer.

      5. "I thought they were going to get Microsoft"? Huh? Would this even have been big news in Afghanistan 5 years ago, when the Taliban took over? I wouldn't think so, but I could be wrong.

      All of this just seems a little...odd. If I had just gotten out from under the boot of an oppressive government, I'd be concerned more about my immediate future than downloading entertainment from a network that had morphed into something completely different over the last 5 years.

      And I don't at all mean this as a troll -- if someone with knowledge of the situation over there could explain how someone with so little access to the rest of the world could know so much about a foreign country, I'm sure we'd all be much abliged. According to the article, he (and possibly other people) are addicted to Slashdot -- Afghanis, if you're out there tell us the truth!

      greg

    3. Re:Easy on the 'Hoax!' shouts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Afghanis, if you're out there tell us the truth!
      >

      I think they're too busy preparing to SURVIVE THE WINTER MONTHS, and eating emergency rations instead of real food. They could give a fuck about Slashdot.

    4. Re:Easy on the 'Hoax!' shouts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So "Junis" has been yanking Katz's chain for a few years. Or (gasp) KATZ IS JUST LYING. He's saying he's received email from "Junis" before in order to legitimize his hoax.

      By the way, this post is 100% accurate, it was dictated to me by a 5000 year old warrior from Atlantis named "gabbagabbahey", who has dictated many other messages to me in the past, so you should trust the content.

    5. Re:Easy on the 'Hoax!' shouts... by Myddrin · · Score: 2

      If you got a random email from someone you've never heard of from a .af domain then yes, you could be suspicious, but if John has known this guy for years then he's in a better position to judge than we are.

      I'm confused. Did this "Junis" forward the email from someone with an .af domain, or is "Junis" in Afg?

      The reason I ask is that he's described as being a "computer geek obessed with Linux" that Katz has conversed with in the past.

      1) If Junis is our friend in Afg, how does he balance his obession with linux with running a commodore? Yes, I know linux works on the amiga, but not all models, and it's specifically refered to as a commodore...usually amigas are called well ... amigas. There is a version of linux that boots on a C-64 (don't have the url handy) but its a very recent development, so he couldn't have tried it out before buring his C64 in the chicken coop.

      2) With the same assumption, does it seem odd that he is "obssessed with linux", thinks Apple was going to beat MS _and_ is very impressed with open source? If he's obsessed with linux, isn't he impressed with open source by default?

      3)If Junis is someone who forwarded a message (and Katz has spoken to him before), then how is this any more reliable than any other forwarded email?

      4) Wouldn't the various nasty chemicals released by decaying chicken feces destroy the delicate circuitry on a computer? Assuming it was an Amiga, I know the A1000 and A2000 were well built, but there are some _nasty_ by products of bird feces decaying. Never mind the dirty clogging the fans, and getting into the circuitry.

      This looks like either Katz is pulling our collective legs, someone is pulling Katz's leg or there's a whole lot of urban legend that got delivered to Katz's inbox.

      I can't wait to see what snopes.com has to say about this.

      --
      Myddrin
    6. Re:Easy on the 'Hoax!' shouts... by Bazman · · Score: 2

      Then John has been hoaxed by this guy for years. I'm not saying one way or the other, but just pointing out this is more than just a chain email being sent round, unless its by someone who has known John's communication with Junis and crafted it in such a manner.

      Its John's recollection of an earlier mail saying he was obsessed with Linux - maybe he once had an x86 box, or knew someone who has. I was obsessed with Vax/VMS many years ago, doesn't mean I had an 11/750 in my bedroom.

    7. Re:Easy on the 'Hoax!' shouts... by OtakuVidiot · · Score: 1

      Where was he able to get a Linux box and play with it enough to become obsessed?
      For what it's worth, I imagine our friend is obsessed about many, many things. Sliced bread, for instance.

    8. Re:Easy on the 'Hoax!' shouts... by bungo · · Score: 1

      Internet connections. Yet he can already predict (in the few days he's been browsing the web, presumably) that "Survivor" and "Temptation Island" will be big hits over there. How the hell did he even find out about these shows, let alone learn enough about them to claim

      This, I think, does show that Jon was trolled. This is just a little too US-specific, and I think proves that it was someone from the US who has sent it.

      I live in Belgium, and I have heard and seen little bits of Survivor, but I have no idea what "Temptation Island" is. It's just not possible for someone in such a short space of time to determine what are the shows currently in the US and know what they're about and if they'd like them.

      Hell, only today did I find out what the MST3K actually is, even though I've heard about it for a long time here on slashdot.

      --
      "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
  92. Yeh, right. by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't believe this for a moment. I hope Katz is above simply fabricating something like this, but I have no idea why he would just 'describe' the letter rather then reposting it here so we can all see for ourselves.

    And as others mentioned, you can't download movies to a commodore, it just wont happen And he wouldn't have been able to do 'modern' programming on it for a long time. While I have heard reports of video stories and movie theaters opening back up, they're more likely to renting Indian and Pakistani films. Although I'm sure some people go for the American ones as well.

    And comments about the iPod and Macs? Yeh, right. This sounds like more of a katzian fantasy to me. How would he even hear about the thing? And why would he want it rather then more reasonable mp3 players. After all, on a pure modem link he isn't going to be able to download movies.

    And unless the northern alliance has managed to get DSL installed in the past few days, he isn't going to be downloading movies no matter what computer he has.

    Katz if you have an journalistic credibility, post the actual message.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Yeh, right. by Mignon · · Score: 2
      unless the northern alliance has managed to get DSL installed in the past few days

      Damn, that's fast. It took me several weeks, with two ISPs, and I live in New York City! I guess that makes Afghanistan a good place for a net-friendly vacation.

  93. In other news: by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    The RIAA has said today, that it is conserned after seeing reports that file-sharing services such as Gnutella have increased in activity recently after Afgan childeren have begun download eminem, britny and agulera songs that they have missed over the past few years. The main concern highlighted by the recording industry is that there is simply no market penatration in the country - with cd sales currently standing at 0, per month. There are legal debates as to weather this means there is 'piracy' in afganistan.

    The porn industry is on an economic up, after the new market of Afganistan has opened up. Hardcore Movie(tm) downloads are said to be at an all time high.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  94. No. by BenHmm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd love to believe this, but no.

    Still, the guy must be brilliant - not only has he got a five year old Commodore to get onto the Apple site, with a five year old browser, over non-existent phone lines but he's planning on spending five years wages on an ipod too?

    It's bollocks.

    I've been to the area and know the sort of conditions. First up, if anyone is using email in Afghanistan it is not over the standard POTS. If much of that is still remaining, it is in no way any condition to get a data connection over. Internet connections in Afghanistan are satellite (Bin Laden's is, so are the Aid Agencies and the journalists). So unless our hero has a either a sat phone, or a 3ft dish in his back garden, I doubt he sent an email from anywhere in the area.

    "Junis's e-mail -- routed to Kabul, then Islamabad, then London" is not the way it would go - if I remember correctly, the main Pakistani bandwidth goes via Singapore. Unless Katz means this email was sent to someone in Kabul who forwarded it to someone etc etc etc.
    In which case I'd hazard a guess to say the first passing was on paper, not electronically.

    Next, "Junis, a computer geek obsessed with Linux, had first e-mailed me years ago while I was writing for Hotwired. He was genial and obsessed with American culture. He loved martial arts movies, anything to do with Star Wars, and rap. He was perhaps the Taliban's prime kind of target. (Now he's furiously trying to download movies he's missed and is mesmerized by open source and Slashdot.)"

    Well, Hotwired's URL was first registered on 21-Apr-1994, but Katz's first writings were on Netizen. That started in 1996. The Taliban took Kabul in 1996, so Junis must have been quick. Obsessed with Linux then, sure - but now mesmerized by open source?

    Which brings us to I thought they were going to get Microsoft," he wrote. "I guess not."

    How did he know of the court case? Meanwhile, where did he learn perfectly idiomatic English? "Get" Microsoft? I "guess not"?

    Temptation Island? Survivor? Riight - an area that until a week ago was isolated from the rest of the world is now aware and anticipatory of a tv show that is not even being aired on a nearby satellite network?

    I'd love to believe this, I really would. But it's smelly as all hell, not to mention the highly dubious "they did it all for the toys" politics.

    Still, if JK posts the email, with the headers, I'll be happy to believe, and drink a toast to Junis and his friends.

    1. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I said in another post, someone presently in Afghanistan could have known about the anti-trust stuff since I believe the anti-trust investigation into Microsoft goes back to about 1990, 1991 or thereabouts, and really got into gear around 1994 or 1995.

      What I don't believe is that it would have been impossible to get any information about the case after September 27, 1996. As I said, 90% of Afghanis regularly listen to Western news outlets on shortwave. It's bullshit that a determined geek would not have known the present state of the anti-trust case.

    2. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. There was an anti-trust investigation back in the early 90's which resulted in a consent decree in '95.

      But the most recent spate of lawsuits didn't start up until 1997.

      Even if they did have access to news, it's also likely then that he would have heard the other pieces of news such as the appeals court overturning the remedies, etc.

      Like the others said, this Katz article is complete utter bullshit.

    3. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>"It's bullshit that a determined geek would not have known the present state of the anti-trust case."

      It is bullshit to believe that an Afghan of all the problems they have would care much about the Microsoft anti trust case.

    4. Re:No. by FallLine · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but I find it very hard to believe that anyone that has lived in Afghanistan for the past decade would find Microsoft's fate significant, never mind important, to their lives. Hmmm, better quality software OR your family/village/life/house/way of life. There is just no comparison between the two. What's more besides personal interest, if the rest of the region finds it of little concern (e.g., little/no media coverage), it's unlikely to reach that individual.

    5. Re:No. by imuffin · · Score: 1

      "Junis's e-mail -- routed to Kabul, then Islamabad, then London" is not the way it would go - if I remember correctly, the main Pakistani bandwidth goes via Singapore. Unless Katz means this email was sent to someone in Kabul who forwarded it to someone etc etc etc.
      In which case I'd hazard a guess to say the first passing was on paper, not electronically.


      No. Actually, it does appear to go through london.

      ...

      8 gbr1-p70.auttx.ip.att.net (12.123.133.22) 11.641 ms 10.797 ms 8.374 ms
      9 gbr4-p10.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.122.2.109) 6.448 ms 7.822 ms 6.348 ms
      10 gbr3-p60.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.122.1.137) 5.109 ms 6.612 ms 6.426 ms
      11 gbr4-p40.attga.ip.att.net (12.122.3.38) 20.097 ms 31.047 ms 36.354 ms
      12 gbr4-p10.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.122.2.162) 51.647 ms 48.060 ms *
      13 gbr3-p60.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.122.1.129) 51.222 ms 51.025 ms 51.342 ms
      14 gbr3-p20.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.3.53) 58.926 ms 59.912 ms 57.151 ms
      15 * gbr1-p100.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.1.150) 59.479 ms 58.959 ms
      16 t2a1-p4-0-0.us-ny.concert.net (192.205.32.74) 71.585 ms 84.599 ms 92.313 ms
      17 t1c1-ge6-0.us-ny.concert.net (166.49.224.1) 214.112 ms 263.098 ms 285.189 ms
      18 t2c1-ge7-0.us-ny.concert.net (166.49.224.43) 95.119 ms 95.564 ms 111.339 ms
      19 t2c1-p2-0.uk-lon2.concert.net (166.49.164.45) 180.919 ms 158.820 ms 165.064 ms
      20 t2a3-ge5-0-0.uk-lon2.concert.net (166.49.176.19) 167.730 ms 168.101 ms 179.358 ms
      21 166.49.218.158 (166.49.218.158) 507.199 ms 494.285 ms 451.786 ms
      22 islamabad-gw1.comsats.net.pk (210.56.8.1) 334.508 ms 319.926 ms 351.413 ms

    6. Re:No. by XO · · Score: 1

      Obviously, dumbass, he meant "Get Microsoft" as in terrorist activity towards Microsoft. Duh.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    7. Re:No. by ElAurian · · Score: 1

      "How did he know of the court case? Meanwhile, where did he learn perfectly idiomatic English? "Get" Microsoft? I "guess not"?"

      You racist fuck. If hundreds of millions of people around the world can learn English as a second language, what's stopping this guy?

    8. Re:No. by BenHmm · · Score: 2

      Absolutely nothing. I speak three languages myself, and spent two years teaching English in China. It's just that I speak my languages as they are taught and not as they are spoken , and I had to teach "Proper" English, and not the same language I would speak to my "mates" with "down the pub".

      It's a great deal more difficult to learn idiomatic usage - and I would venture to say almost impossible given the isolation this alleged Afghan would have been under for the past five years, especially given no proper schooling for that time.

      There are plenty of English structures that native speakers use all the time that are totally incomprehensible to non-native speakers. Even from one English-speaking region to another you find mutual misunderstanding, and this gulf is all the greater between the idiomatic English of the sort in Katz's letter, and the sort of English you would naturally learn or be taught as someone living in a rural village in Afghanistan.

      It's nothing to do with his ability to learn English, just his ability to learn idiomatic English under those conditions.

    9. Re:No. by RichN · · Score: 1
      I speak three languages myself...

      C'mon, now. You know Java and Perl don't count...

      --

      Rich

  95. Mod parent up please. by Kengineer · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Re:Jon Katz Suck Ass!

    He's so right.

    - kengineer

  96. hoax by Rev.LoveJoy · · Score: 4, Funny
    TO: JONKTAZ@SLASHDOT.ORG
    FROM: JEFFK@KABUL.COM

    Dear Mr. Ktaz,

    Here in kablu we think teh intraenet is supra neat!!!

    Thoes silly persons with towles on thier heads havn't made us not liek our computras!!! or something!!!!

    Technolagy is really cool!!!! - JEFFK

    ((satire))

    Cheers,
    -- RLJ

    if you're not getting the joke

  97. cultural warfare by necrognome · · Score: 1

    Just show them a replay of Sunday's Britney Spears concert from Vegas. Checkmate.

    --


    Let's get drunk and delete production data!
  98. This news in... by iceT · · Score: 1, Troll

    from the comfortable confinds of Jon's Herman-Miller chair...

    Jon, did you research your story? Try to verify the facts? Try to corraborate it with conventional news broadcasts?

    Jon Katz: reporter, commentator, or story teller? (a/k/a fact, opinion, or fiction?)

    --
    -- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
  99. reality by 3am · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    reality is not in a book.

    1984, for whatever insight it offered, wasn't anything more than a product of the imagination of Orwell.

    Similarly, The Old Man and the Sea was nothing but a product of Hemingways mind.

    Neither is any kind of authoritative guide on the human condition. They are both opinions and reflections of reality. You cannot use them to deduce anything more about human nature and/or 'spirit' than you could by watching 'Indiana Jones'.

    --

    A: None. The Universe spins the bulb, and the Zen master merely stays out of the way.
    1. Re:reality by revscat · · Score: 2

      I pity you. Truly, I do. If the most astute literary analysis you can come up with is a whining "that's just your opinion!" then you are missing out on many great authors who have made frequently illuminating commentaries on the human condition. Do you truly believe that "The Plague" is a treatise on human nature of no more importance than the latest Danielle Steele novel? Or that "The Brothers Karamazov" holds equal philosophical value to "Harry Potter"? Or that "1984" has nothing whatsoever important to say -- no matter how allegorical -- about freedom and totalitarian governments?

      No book is an authoritative guide on the human condition. There isn't one. But some books can provide far greater insights into that condition than others. Reducing it to simply being an "opinion" is nothing more than intellectual laziness.

      IMHO.

      That's irony, son. Can you dig it?

      - Rev.
    2. Re:reality by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 1

      While I do agree with you that reality is not in a book, I feel compelled to point out that Orwell wrote 1984 based upon his experiences in the Spanish civil war, where he could observe two oppressive regimes (Fascist and Communist) fighting each other, claiming fundamental ideological differences, while in reality they were using the exact same methods to crush opposition and assure their rule.

      The reason why 1984 struck me, was that despite the fact George Orwell has never lived in my country, part of the Soviet Bloc for many years, he described the daily reality of my grandparents, parents and myself in unimaginably vivid colors -- he felt just the way we did.

      So yes, it was the insight he had that makes him such an important author to read. How else would you describe a state of dictatorship to someone who has never lived in one, if not through the viewpoint of 1984, Animal Farm and the Gulag Archipelago?

    3. Re:reality by 3am · · Score: 2

      okay, i am not above admitting i've made a mistake. and with the benefit of you further explanation, i realize i have made one.

      although it may have never have come across as such in my post, i read and loved both the old man and the sea and 1984 (along with many other pieces by hemingway and orwell... as a matter of fact, i think orwell's essays on politics and writing are some of the finest examples of the essay in the english language).

      and i do respect his experience - as a man who lived through WWII, the rise of fascism across europe, and the failure of communism in the ussr. he wrote about his time with a rare combination of insight into human nature, writing skill, and imagination.

      that said though...

      i don't believe a book can really speak the whole truth about human nature. i think every piece of literature, painting, film, and .. well, everything that people do. ... offers a glimpse of the human 'spirit'.

      while i respect orwell and think that 1984 is one of the finer books ever written, i feel that is like a single jewel in Indra's net in Buddhist philosophy... albeit a particularly brilliant one. also in that net are siddhartha, guernica, life is beautiful, countless daily acts of kindness, just as many acts of cruelty... each of them interconnected and reflected in each other, forming the whole.

      or perhaps there isn't a whole/truth to find.

      either way, i don't think it's in any one book, and that is what i originally thought you meant. sorry about that :)

      --

      A: None. The Universe spins the bulb, and the Zen master merely stays out of the way.
  100. Why I Don't Understand Katz by KingJawa · · Score: 1

    Today, Mr. Katz starts with "An open information society is inevitable." But in the past, he often chose to rail on the ad hominemly named "Big Media" for, well, trying to silence other opinions. You've seen this drivel -- Katz claiming that CNNSIAOLTIMEWARNERLOONEYTOONS will take over the world, imposing de facto restrictions on certain opinions, etc.

    But today, open information is inevitable.

    Seriously, what am I missing?

  101. Humanity is doomed! by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2
    If the world needed another demonstration of America's most powerful weapon -- not bombs or special forces but pop culture -- it got it again this week...people's love for American techno-toys, TV shows, music and movies is breathaking...Junis predicts "Temptation Island" will be the number one show in Afghanistan within a month.


    If this is true then humanity is doomed! We deserve to be wiped out by the first alien race that happens upon us...that is if we don't do it to ourselves first.

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  102. Open society inevitable, eh? by Malc · · Score: 1

    I guess you missed: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/11/20/131223 9&mode=thread. Where fundamentalism, especially of the religious type, rules society, it will not be free. This is particularly true where the people buy into the religious ideals.

    1. Re:Open society inevitable, eh? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Why focus on religious fundamentalism when you have a corporatacracy keeping the lid on too much freedom. It isn't churches who control information, culture, and access to government anymore.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:Open society inevitable, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or RMS keeping the lid on *my* freedom to sell software? I find /. to be far more of a police state than any "corperate" world. Get out of your cave atleast once in your life!

    3. Re:Open society inevitable, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If stupid people are not religious they will other stupid ideas. There are plenty of a priori assumptions that can take the place of belief in God.

      1. You can believe Capitalism is human nature.
      2. You can believe government is human nature.
      3. You can believe that the Constitution of the US is self evident.

      etc., etc.

  103. Nothing Fishy About It by Pavel42 · · Score: 1

    It's good to know PsyOps is alive and well.

  104. When you lose something by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

    you realized how valuable tha thing really was.

    We take for granted our TVs, internet, computers, pr0n, our liberty, etc. in such a way that sometimes we don't see how valuable these things are.

    let's keep an eye on this new free Afghanistan, they can teach us a lot on this subject.

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
  105. Horse stuff by cadfael · · Score: 1
    Dear Mr. Katz...

    This reeks of unmitigated, unsubstantiated horse crap...I think you need to

    1. Give substantiation to your facts
    2. Cite your sources
    3. Pull this crap you made up
    I cannot believe that /. wishes to be taken seriously when stuff like this is posted and allowed on line. Mr. Katz, how the hades does a person in a country with no basic infrastructure do the things you are speaking of? If I recall correctly, the US wiped out the infrastructure by bombing what was left of it. This means that someone is either filling your mind with nonsense, or you are just letting it out....please let us know which one so we know which one to ignore. I believe that you know which way the populace is leaning if you have read the responses here.

    --
    -- The Hollow Man
    Non illegitimati carborundum
  106. Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Computer! · · Score: 0, Troll

    What business is it of ours how women are treated in Afghanistan? Since when were we the moral compass for the world? Last time I checked, we had seperation of church and state, which Afghanistan does not have. That means they get to rule their country however their religon sees fit. Attempted "Modernization" of Saudi Arabia is what created the whole fundie Muslim movement in the first place. I know it's probably hard for us equal-rights-crazed Americans (and Europeans), but maybe Afghans like it that way. Yes, even the women. Ask orthodox Jews or the Amish if they'd like to be forced to "modernize", and see what they think! If the Afghans would like to treat their women differently, let them figure it out for themselves, rather than putting our big nose in somebody else's business, which is what got us into this mess to begin with.

    --
    If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    1. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by daoine · · Score: 1
      Agreed on a couple points: no, we are not the moral compass of the world, no we don't have the right to tell people how to govern themselves - no matter how much it sucks, and no, we can't force people to "modernize".

      I think my point was more along the lines of a reminder that even though Katz is waving the modernization and free information and everything is gonna be great flag, there's a whole lot of people over there who currently aren't able to get on that boat.

    2. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I know it's probably hard for us equal-rights-crazed Americans (and Europeans)

      That was the point in the origonal post. We are equal right crazed, but women are treated as minorities in U.S. even though white female are in majority

    3. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Eccles · · Score: 4, Informative

      What business is it of ours how women are treated in Afghanistan?

      Mankind is my business, and yours too. Enslave someone *anywhere*, and I have the moral right to stop you. Morality does not stop at national borders.

      Ask orthodox Jews or the Amish if they'd like to be forced to "modernize", and see what they think!

      The Taliban forced people to do things they didn't want to do. It's not like all of Afghanistan sat down and agreed, "OK, women stay at home, don't get schooling, and have to wear burqas." People with guns forced others to behave that way.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    4. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Mankind is my business, and yours too. Enslave someone *anywhere*, and I have the moral right to stop you. Morality does not stop at national borders.

      True!, but the morality excuse stops applying when we start slectively helping some and looking the other way in other cases.

    5. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Computer! · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Mankind is my business, and yours too. Enslave someone *anywhere*, and I have the moral right to stop you. Morality does not stop at national borders. "

      What you and I call "enslavement", Afghans call "respect". Anyway, you can't even stop me from "enslaving" my wife if I lived next door to you, as long as I don't break any laws. How can you expect to Americanize these people halfway across the globe? Moral right? What does that even mean on a global scale? You have no rights not given to you by your nation of residence. If you live in Afghanistan, and you are a woman, you live like an Afghan woman. If you live in America, you get to sit and watch.

      "It's not like all of Afghanistan sat down and agreed, 'OK, women stay at home, don't get schooling, and have to wear burqas.'"

      You mean that there was no election, right? So what? There has never been an election in Saudi Arabia either. Democracy is not for everyone. Just ask China. Notice we're not doing shit about how they treat their women. That's because we'd get our democratic asses handed to us if we tried. As soon as you become a Muslim you accept that women are to be treated differently. It's a vital part of their beliefs. Although not as extreme, all 1 billion of the world's Muslims behave this way. You want to go ask them to stop? Be my guest.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    6. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by david614 · · Score: 1

      I get the point. No one has any right to comment on anyone's actions anywhere else, because we are not superior to them.

      OK.

      Real moral depth to this position. Ultra-radical relativism?

      By the way, you failed. You do sound like an asshole.

      --
      ELITISM: It's always lonely at the top. Uninvited company is rarely welcome.
    7. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by defile · · Score: 2

      If you need to become a police state to enforce the law, then the law is unjust.

      ...and...

      Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

      A few cliches aren't grounds for justifying war alone, but while we take "inalienable rights" for granted, the idea is very new and strange to undeveloped countries.

      What got us into this mess was that we used Afghanistan as a tool against the Soviet Union and then abandoned it once they were defeated. I think we have a moral responsibility to fix what we broke, at the very least.

    8. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by FoulBeard · · Score: 2

      Well you could look at it from a different approach. If the Afghan women wanted freedom and equal rights that badly then they would have made more of a fuss about it. The people are responsible for the actions of their government. Repeat after me...

      A civilization is responsible for the actions of their government.

      If the people where feeling repressed then they would have done something about it by now. I'm sure there is a minority that is oppressed but if widescale oppression was rampart the the general populace would have done something about it long ago. Its not a popular view, but one I think runs true.

    9. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Eccles · · Score: 2

      What you and I call "enslavement", Afghans call "respect".

      You can call a pile of bat guano filet mignon if you want to, but I'm still not going to eat it.

      Anyway, you can't even stop me from "enslaving" my wife if I lived next door to you, as long as I don't break any laws.

      Sure I can. I can choose to try and get her out of there, just like Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad did back when slavery was legal in this country. Did the law make slavery moral? Like hell.

      How can you expect to Americanize these people halfway across the globe?

      It seems to me like we've already started doing exactly that. "Americanize" is your term, not mine, but if you mean eliminating repression, yes, we already *have* done a lot of that.

      You have no rights not given to you by your nation of residence.

      Here we're getting into a terminology argument. As TJ wrote, we are "endowed with certain inalienable rights". As such, our government does not give us or take away rights, it can merely guarantee them or violate them. On the other hand, the Federalists gave an enumeration in the Bill of Rights. In that context, rights are specified in law. So talking about rights becomes a terminology discussion. I'd rather discuss moral/immoral.

      Do you agree that slavery, regardless of where it occurs, is immoral? If not, I posit you're a nihilist, and thus anything goes anyway; arguing we don't have a right to do X posits that there is a universal morality, which contradicts your assertion of localized morality.

      There has never been an election in Saudi Arabia either.

      Yup, and it's a pretty repressive place with immoral leaders. I would be morally right to free its people from such repression. That doesn't mean I have to throw my life away futilely. Just because you can't do something to stop immoral behavior doesn't make it moral, just unstoppable.

      Democracy is not for everyone.

      Just because we can't stop all repression doesn't mean we can't (or shouldn't) stop some, or pressuring governments to reduce repression.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    10. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid fake libertarians. I can smell them wherever they are.

      Give us back our word. We anarchists have used that word long before you have, to describe our doctrine and you hijacked it. You can only hijack it in North America though, in Europe your no one knows of your kind of libertariaism.

    11. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>"You can call a pile of bat guano filet mignon if you want to, but I'm still not going to eat it."

      You can call yourself a libertarian but I will not eat it either. You are pro government. You are pro having a morality forced upon us.

      "....justice or right is simply what is in
      the interest of the stronger party" - Thrasymachus from Plato's "The Republic"

      Such is the justice of your "libertarian" party.

    12. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo, chap.

      This self righteous dollop, is too reflective of the beliefs of this community so he gets modded up. For what? For being irrational, and catering to common irrationality.

    13. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Computer! · · Score: 1



      I agree that there is an objective morality (God). I do not, however believe that a nation of people which has totally eliminated any objectivity, morality, or mention of either in popular culture and government has any right to tell an entire race how to treat its women. You mention Federalists, Bills of Rights, etc, etc, apparently unaware that all of those concepts are govermental, not moral. Make the argument that governments have any moral responsibility, and /.'ers would jump all over you, citing that their "civil liberties" are under assault. I happen to agree that if injustice is happening somewhere, it should be stopped. Our national power grants us a national responsibility. Unfortunately, by stepping in to this situation, we affect how millions practice their religion. This is not our job. Hell, for all we know, we might not even be right. You cannot judge other nations based on the standards of your own. Slavery was wrong in America, therefore it was abolished. Abolished, I might add, last of all industrialized nations. This was not done by an occupying force from Europe, educating us heathens, but by an act of law, written and ratified right here in the USA. If those people want change, they'll get it. If they don't, they need to be left alone so that no one feels obligated to crash airplanes into anything.


      Yup, and it's a pretty repressive place with immoral leaders.


      Says you! If the Saudi people are happy that way, leave them be. The last time they were modernized, they formed a radical Muslim group called the Taliban, and that fucking sucked.

      We are not superheroes ridding the world from anything we find distasteful. We are just another powerful country. When the Soviets tried to do what you suggest (ridding the world of injustice), we pointed nukes at them. Our capitalist society was just as offensive to them as the Afghani way of life is to us.

      Just because we can't stop all repression doesn't mean we can't (or shouldn't) stop some, or pressuring governments to reduce repression.

      Everyone does not have to think and live like we do. Democracy in this form hasn't really been around long enough to establish it as the de facto standard for governing everyone. In fact, fewer people live under democracy than don't. Pressuring governments pisses them off, although you already know that. The Dutch don't pressure us to legalize drugs, do they? France doesn't ask us to put titties on billboards. Anyway, dead horse.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    14. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Computer! · · Score: 1

      Good point there, and thanks. Apparently my post was both Flamebait and Overrated, which when scored at 1 is hard to believe.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    15. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Computer! · · Score: 1

      I get the point. No one has any right to comment on anyone's actions anywhere else, because we are not superior to them.

      Actually, I guess you didn't get the point. You can comment all you want, because this is America, Land of the Free and all that. What you can't do is go over there, and make them act a certain way, like they're our little children. You do not have to agree with their belief system, but if you don't respect it, well, I guess nothing really. But you should. It's the way of life of almost a billion people.

      Also, calling someone an asshole online is easy and small.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    16. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Computer! · · Score: 1

      If not, I posit you're a nihilist, and thus anything goes anyway; arguing we don't have a right to do X posits that there is a universal morality, which contradicts your assertion of localized morality.

      Ah hah! I just got this. You're a smart guy. Smart, and wrong. Here's the deal: belief in an objective Right does not necessarily translate into belief in America being the clearinghouse for everything that's OK. In fact, most of us theists believe that what makes morality possible is the free will that allows us to choose Right over Wrong. At the least, you have to agree that free will makes morality more powerful. So: I do believe in objective right. I do not, however believe that America's version is the one the world should live by.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    17. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by alienmole · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What business is it of ours how women are treated in Afghanistan?

      It may not be any business of yours, but I'm making it my business. You can try to stop me, but you won't do so with words.

      If your only issue is whether the people in these places want change, that's an easy question to answer: they do, go visit one of these countries sometime and ask.

      If you were truly correct that the people in these societies liked the conditions they lived under, it would be a different matter. The fact is, though, most of them don't; however, brutal police states, corrupt governments, and lack of resources stops most of them from doing anything about it.

      I've travelled and lived in Africa, and travelled in the Middle East, and what you often see is similar to what used to happen in the Soviet Union: people do the things people do anyway, if they can get away with it, but they do it underground and at serious risk to their lives and freedom. You may not care about this, but having lived in environments like this, I do.

      And, despite your belief that "putting our nose in somebody else's business" got us into this, one can make a credible argument for the opposite being true: the U.S. has remained too hands-off in its foreign policy, only getting involved when it has a clear, direct strategic interest in a particular situation. The reasons for this foreign policy date back to World War II and Vietnam. However, this may not be in the the US's own interest. It means that from the point of view of people in other countries, US involvement is capricious and unpredictable, leading to resentment when the US does or doesn't get involved in a situation where others think it should or shouldn't.

      A policy based more clearly on things like human rights interest could actually go a long way towards improving America's reputation in the rest of the world, and would not necessarily cost significantly more money, since America could certainly get international backing and cooperation for such a policy.

    18. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy to respond to the actions of your government when they've got AK-47s and you have nothing, isn't it?

    19. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Computer! · · Score: 1

      If your only issue is whether the people in these places want change, that's an easy question to answer: they do, go visit one of these countries sometime and ask.

      No! I won't go around taking surveys on people's happiness worldwide! This is getting ridiculous. The Taliban is gone. People have shaved their beards and dug up their TVs. Great. You'll notice that women still cover themselves head-to-foot, and don't leave the house alone. This is true of many mid-east countries, and several Asian ones as well. We cannot go around "correcting" other people's religious beliefs! My point was not wether or not they would rather live that way. Most Catholics would rather do a lot of fun stuff. That doesn't mean such practices fit within their moral standards, or those of their peers.

      the U.S. has remained too hands-off in its foreign policy, only getting involved when it has a clear, direct strategic interest in a particular situation.

      Yeah, no shit. My mom had a saying: "choose your battles". This is nothing new in U.S. foriegn policy, just like it's nothing new in parenting or business. Many would argue that this attitude is what's let us become as powerful as we are today. No one sees this as capricious. Everyone knows we bitch about civil rights, and fight over oil. The reason countries even expect our help is because of our hands-on policies of the past. Why doesn't anyone get upset at Denmark for staying out of their business? Because they always do! They're Denmark!

      A policy based more clearly on things like human rights interest could actually go a long way towards improving America's reputation in the rest of the world,[...]

      You mean the tiny portion of the world that hasn't already moved here. Everyone wants to be American. Our reputation is bad because we insist on meddling in other people's religious belief systems, when we don't even have one. That irony has not been lost on the Eastern world.

      [...]since America could certainly get international backing and cooperation for such a policy.

      Not in your wildest dreams. The last time we got international backing for anything (before 9/11) was when the Axis Powers were kicking ass worldwide. Russia never even declared war on Japan until both bombs had decimated the island. 3 years after Pearl Harbor. The problem is that every country has different ideas on what makes human rights. Unless you'd like to usher in an Orwellian World Government, we need to start leaving this stuff alone.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    20. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      You have my vote:)
      Mod this parent up as insightful

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    21. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever hear of RAWA? These people are trying to do exactly what you've said, but their numbers are quite few compared to the total population of women in Afghanistan. It's not like the majority wouldn't like to have more freedoms, it's just that they're too afraid to speak out.

    22. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by alienmole · · Score: 2
      No! I won't go around taking surveys on people's happiness worldwide!
      That's fine, but if others wish to do so and act on what they find, sitting in your armchair complaining about people helping other people is rather ludicrous.
      You mean the tiny portion of the world that hasn't already moved here. Everyone wants to be American.

      That's an overstatement, but it's kind of my point. The reason people want to move to America is because it offers a relatively high degree of religious, economic, and political freedom. But America props up governments which don't allow this, to suit its oil interests (e.g. Saudi Arabia), and fosters internal rebellion when it harms their enemies (Afghanistan and the Soviet Union), but it doesn't necessarily actually help to improve the situation in the countries it ostensibly "helps". In more recent years, since the collapse of the Soviet Union, policy has improved, but it still ultimately derives from a time when the US's policy goals were very different. It needs revamping, and time and again it has been demonstrated that isolationism and non-involvement are not the answer.

      Actually, I think the direction in which U.S. policy is now developing is positive - some of the things I'm talking about are being more actively considered, such as the establishment of a stable government in Afghanistan. This is based on experience with mistakes in the past.

      The last time we got international backing for anything (before 9/11) was when the Axis Powers were kicking ass worldwide.

      It depends how you define it. For example, the US had United Nations support for the actions against Iraq after the invasion of Kuwait, and NATO support (at least) for Kosovo. Perhaps you're suggesting that this support was not sufficiently great, financially or in terms of military resources provided. However, if the U.S. had a clearer policy that went beyond its own direct interests, it would more easily be able to obtain real support from other countries.

      Note that going beyond the "direct interests" of the U.S. doesn't necessarily imply being purely humanitarian or altruistic. Rather, it recognizes that these issues are complex and intertwining, and can have very long-term implications. It may be unwise to take too narrow a view based only on the most obvious short-term payoff or lack thereof.

    23. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American Civil War.

      South Africa.

      Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

      Saudi royal family.

      These four topics are topics your reply makes wild assumptions about. Please read more about them before attempting a coherent summary.

      Thanks!

    24. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Slavery was wrong in America, therefore it was abolished.

      ...by the North imposing its will on the South via invasion, which claimed to be a distinct country (succession and all that.) It had sod all to do with passing laws, it took government troops armed with guns and ~600,000 deaths. One fairly cohesive group (the North) imposed its will on another (the South). And it was the right thing to do.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    25. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
      What business is it of ours how women are treated in Afghanistan?

      I think Marley's Ghost said it best:

      'Business!' cried the Ghost, wringing its hands again. 'Mankind was my business. The common welfare was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, and benevolence, were, all, my business. The dealings of my trade were but a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of my business!'
      Besides, it's not as simple as know-nothings such as yourself would have it. Try looking into conditions for women in Afghanistan before the Taliban arrived before issuing pronouncements on what they'd choose for themselves given the chance.
      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    26. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He got the point. The person was one of those self righteous dollops who believe his society is greater than everyone else's that now exists, every society that came before and will come after. This is and old tired idea. That person further advocates forcibly imposing his values on the world. You are the one who does not understand.

    27. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you expect from someone who believes in the libertarian party which is an aberration of rational thought.

    28. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>"The Taliban forced people to do things they didn't want to do. It's not like all of Afghanistan sat down and agreed, "OK, women stay at home, don't get schooling, and have to wear burqas." People with guns forced others to behave that way."

      The US government forced people to do things they didn't want to do. It's not like all of the United States sat down and agreed, "OK, we will work and have some rich industrialist enjoy enormous profits off our labour and pay 46 percent of our income to the State." People with guns forced others to behave that way.

      Your same argument thrown right back in your face.

    29. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The US government forced people to do things they didn't want to do. It's not like all of the United States sat down and agreed, "OK, we will work and have some rich industrialist enjoy enormous profits off our labour and pay 46 percent of our income to the State." People with guns forced others to behave that way."

      Now you don't really beleive this is moral equivilance, do you? Perhaps I could see light shining thru you head, but in case there is some gray matter between your ears consider these "Yes, but..."'s:

      Yes, but... We are free to speak out publicly and loudly about our government, without fear of repression or retaliation. (You just did. Hell, anyone can.)

      Yes, but... We are free to leave the US and try our luck elsewhere, whenever we like. Ask any woman in Afghanistan if it's like that there.

      Yes, but... We can vote ppl out of office if enough of us feel they should go. Anybody run against Mullah Omar lately? Ever?

      Yes, but... We can bring suit against someone, even the government. As far as I can tell, there is no such thing as due process in Afghanistan under the Taliban, unless you count, "oh, hell, just shoot 'em and let Allah sort 'em out" due process.

      Yes, but... We have the right to keep and bear arms so if they DO come for us we can take an honor guard to hell with us. No, I don't own a gun -- but it's my CHOICE not to.

      We can do all these things and no one will come and shoot us for doing them.

      WHY do you ppl continually try to come up with moral equivilance between the US and Osama et al? Sure we've got hipocrasy in our government but nowhere NEAR the level the Talibubbas have taken it to: Death if YOU use a PC, but it's OK for us; death if YOU watch TV, but its ok for us; hovels, no food or medicine for you, mansions and expensive cars for us, death to YOU if women aren't in burqahs, prostitutes for us, etc. etc. etc.

      How come Osama didn't use at least SOME of that 300 Million *US*D to help out the ppl he cares so much about (just ask him)?? How come Saddam spends his cash on weapons stockpiles and tells everyone it's the US' fault and you EVEN CONSIDER believing him? How come the Taliban forced Afghan farmers to grow opium poppies instead of food, so the Talibubbas can get cash from the West and then they use said cash to buy weapons while the Afghan people starve? How come Mullah Omar drives a tricked-out $50K Suburban (made in USA, of course) while his people are starving? How come, in spite of all these facts (you can look 'em up) it's TOTALLY the US' fault??

      Now, I'm not saying the US is perfect; I'd just like to see some honesty here. Things may be bad in the Middle East in part because of stupid US policy tricks. But we had help. A LOT of help. Where d'ya think Osama got all that money, hmmm?

      Not to get Christian here, but it's like the Man said "don't point out the mote in your brother's eye until you've removed the beam from your own". Words to live by. 'Fess up.

    30. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by srand · · Score: 1

      You do. Excellent job =) A dumb asshole at that.

      Click here, and then click here to find out how much Afghani women like life under the Taliban.

      And don't speak about the Taliban as if they are a legitimate government the people of Afghanistan voted into power. They aren't. They're more like rapists or vultures picking over a corpse the Soviets left behind.

    31. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Computer! · · Score: 1

      I don't know why I feel the need to respond to an AC. My girlfriend says I argue too much, so maybe that's it. As far as wild assumptions, I'm a pretty wild and crazy dude, so look out! Assuming that the slaves were freed by an act of law is probably way off, I'm sure. It was probably the emancipation fairies. I never said anything about South Africa, so rock on with your bad self. I never mentioned the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, just the Cold War in general. I really meant Korea, to be honest. Saw a great PBS special on that. Really informative. Oh, also, my grandpa died in that war. He was a jet pilot. As far as the King and his 7000 princes, I got some know-how on that from another PBS special. I should really pledge to them next pledge drive.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    32. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Computer! · · Score: 1

      by the North imposing its will on the South via invasion

      The North of what? The South of what? Yeah, America. I never said it didn't take war, and that everybody group-hugged away slavery (which was only one of the issues behind that war). I said it was a domestic issue, and I was right.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    33. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Computer! · · Score: 1

      ARRRRGGGHH! The Taliban is on the way out, people! We're not talking about the Taliban! We're talking about post-Taliban society in Afghanistan! Read the article, then read the posts after it, then kiss my ass. Then spend some time with your family this joyous season. Then kiss my ass again.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    34. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by j-beda · · Score: 2
      I should really pledge to them next pledge drive.

      Why wait? They'll be happy to take your money right now, today!.

      You can probably even do it online.

    35. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Oztun · · Score: 2

      Afghanistan is made of of many different groups who have opposing views. They are divided hence easy to conquer.

      When someone has a gun to your head are you still not the people? How can you be responsible for the actions of your government if violence and your death is the only way to fight back?

      Repeating your comment might brainwash some but it will not help the starving people of Afghanistan. I guess it is easy to brush off others problems and get on with your life by looking at things with such a simple approach. Unfortunatley without a voting booth this just doesn't work for these people.

    36. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by ajmarks · · Score: 1

      Speaking as an orthodox Jew, I think you're a little off base when you compare our treatment of women with that of extremist muslim governments. Encouraging women to wear knee length skirts is not the same as covering them completely and not allowing them to visit doctors on pain of severe beatings.

      --
      Opinions are not Informative, though they may be Insightful or Interesting.
    37. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as an ordinary human being, I think your Zionist Jews are fucking disgusting.

      Let us review the Zionist position:

      1. Palestine has been given to us by God
      2. That land has been holy to your people for over 2000 years
      3. You have been persecuted through the years; Holocaust; Russification for Russian Jews

      And from this the Jews somehow argue it is their right to occupy and despoil the Palestineans and their land. Somehow this is all for great justice or something of the sort.

    38. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Etext prepared by John Bickers, jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz
      and Bonnie Sala, Sterling Editing Services, clio@uscom.com

      Project Gutenberg Etexts are usually created from multiple editions,
      all of which are in the Public Domain in the United States, unless a
      copyright notice is included. Therefore, we do NOT keep these books
      in compliance with any particular paper edition, usually otherwise.

      We are now trying to release all our books one month in advance
      of the official release dates, for time for better editing.

      Please note: neither this list nor its contents are final till
      midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement.
      The official release date of all Project Gutenberg Etexts is at
      Midnight, Central Time, of the last day of the stated month. A
      preliminary version may often be posted for suggestion, comment
      and editing by those who wish to do so. To be sure you have an
      up to date first edition [xxxxx10x.xxx] please check file sizes
      in the first week of the next month. Since our ftp program has
      a bug in it that scrambles the date [tried to fix and failed] a
      look at the file size will have to do, but we will try to see a
      new copy has at least one byte more or less.

      Information about Project Gutenberg (one page)

      We produce about two million dollars for each hour we work. The
      fifty hours is one conservative estimate for how long it we take
      to get any etext selected, entered, proofread, edited, copyright
      searched and analyzed, the copyright letters written, etc. This
      projected audience is one hundred million readers. If our value
      per text is nominally estimated at one dollar then we produce $2
      million dollars per hour this year as we release thirty-two text
      files per month, or 384 more Etexts in 1997 for a total of 1000+
      If these reach just 10% of the computerized population, then the
      total should reach over 100 billion Etexts given away.

      The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Give Away One Trillion Etext
      Files by the December 31, 2001. [10,000 x 100,000,000=Trillion]
      This is ten thousand titles each to one hundred million readers,
      which is only 10% of the present number of computer users. 2001
      should have at least twice as many computer users as that, so it
      will require us reaching less than 5% of the users in 2001.

      We need your donations more than ever!

      All donations should be made to "Project Gutenberg/CMU": and are
      tax deductible to the extent allowable by law. (CMU = Carnegie-
      Mellon University).

      For these and other matters, please mail to:

      Project Gutenberg
      P. O. Box 2782
      Champaign, IL 61825

      When all other email fails try our Executive Director:
      Michael S. Hart

      We would prefer to send you this information by email
      (Internet, Bitnet, Compuserve, ATTMAIL or MCImail).

      ******
      If you have an FTP program (or emulator), please
      FTP directly to the Project Gutenberg archives:
      [Mac users, do NOT point and click. . .type]

      ftp uiarchive.cso.uiuc.edu
      login: anonymous
      password: your@login
      cd etext/etext90 through /etext96
      or cd etext/articles [get suggest gut for more information]
      dir [to see files]
      get or mget [to get files. . .set bin for zip files]
      GET INDEX?00.GUT
      for a list of books
      and
      GET NEW GUT for general information
      and
      MGET GUT* for newsletters.

      **Information prepared by the Project Gutenberg legal advisor**
      (Three Pages)

      ***START**THE SMALL PRINT!**FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN ETEXTS**START***
      Why is this "Small Print!" statement here? You know: lawyers.
      They tell us you might sue us if there is something wrong with
      your copy of this etext, even if you got it for free from
      someone other than us, and even if what's wrong is not our
      fault. So, among other things, this "Small Print!" statement
      disclaims most of our liability to you. It also tells you how
      you can distribute copies of this etext if you want to.

      *BEFORE!* YOU USE OR READ THIS ETEXT
      By using or reading any part of this PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
      etext, you indicate that you understand, agree to and accept
      this "Small Print!" statement. If you do not, you can receive
      a refund of the money (if any) you paid for this etext by
      sending a request within 30 days of receiving it to the person
      you got it from. If you received this etext on a physical
      medium (such as a disk), you must return it with your request.

      ABOUT PROJECT GUTENBERG-TM ETEXTS
      This PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm etext, like most PROJECT GUTENBERG-
      tm etexts, is a "public domain" work distributed by Professor
      Michael S. Hart through the Project Gutenberg Association at
      Carnegie-Mellon University (the "Project"). Among other
      things, this means that no one owns a United States copyright
      on or for this work, so the Project (and you!) can copy and
      distribute it in the United States without permission and
      without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth
      below, apply if you wish to copy and distribute this etext
      under the Project's "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark.

      To create these etexts, the Project expends considerable
      efforts to identify, transcribe and proofread public domain
      works. Despite these efforts, the Project's etexts and any
      medium they may be on may contain "Defects". Among other
      things, Defects may take the form of incomplete, inaccurate or
      corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
      intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged
      disk or other etext medium, a computer virus, or computer
      codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

      LIMITED WARRANTY; DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES
      But for the "Right of Replacement or Refund" described below,
      [1] the Project (and any other party you may receive this
      etext from as a PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm etext) disclaims all
      liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including
      legal fees, and [2] YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE OR
      UNDER STRICT LIABILITY, OR FOR BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONTRACT,
      INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
      OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE
      POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

      If you discover a Defect in this etext within 90 days of
      receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any)
      you paid for it by sending an explanatory note within that
      time to the person you received it from. If you received it
      on a physical medium, you must return it with your note, and
      such person may choose to alternatively give you a replacement
      copy. If you received it electronically, such person may
      choose to alternatively give you a second opportunity to
      receive it electronically.

      THIS ETEXT IS OTHERWISE PROVIDED TO YOU "AS-IS". NO OTHER
      WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE TO YOU AS
      TO THE ETEXT OR ANY MEDIUM IT MAY BE ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT
      LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
      PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

      Some states do not allow disclaimers of implied warranties or
      the exclusion or limitation of consequential damages, so the
      above disclaimers and exclusions may not apply to you, and you
      may have other legal rights.

      INDEMNITY
      You will indemnify and hold the Project, its directors,
      officers, members and agents harmless from all liability, cost
      and expense, including legal fees, that arise directly or
      indirectly from any of the following that you do or cause:
      [1] distribution of this etext, [2] alteration, modification,
      or addition to the etext, or [3] any Defect.

      DISTRIBUTION UNDER "PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm"
      You may distribute copies of this etext electronically, or by
      disk, book or any other medium if you either delete this
      "Small Print!" and all other references to Project Gutenberg,
      or:

      [1] Only give exact copies of it. Among other things, this
      requires that you do not remove, alter or modify the
      etext or this "small print!" statement. You may however,
      if you wish, distribute this etext in machine readable
      binary, compressed, mark-up, or proprietary form,
      including any form resulting from conversion by word pro-
      cessing or hypertext software, but only so long as
      *EITHER*:

      [*] The etext, when displayed, is clearly readable, and
      does *not* contain characters other than those
      intended by the author of the work, although tilde
      (~), asterisk (*) and underline (_) characters may
      be used to convey punctuation intended by the
      author, and additional characters may be used to
      indicate hypertext links; OR

      [*] The etext may be readily converted by the reader at
      no expense into plain ASCII, EBCDIC or equivalent
      form by the program that displays the etext (as is
      the case, for instance, with most word processors);
      OR

      [*] You provide, or agree to also provide on request at
      no additional cost, fee or expense, a copy of the
      etext in its original plain ASCII form (or in EBCDIC
      or other equivalent proprietary form).

      [2] Honor the etext refund and replacement provisions of this
      "Small Print!" statement.

      [3] Pay a trademark license fee to the Project of 20% of the
      net profits you derive calculated using the method you
      already use to calculate your applicable taxes. If you
      don't derive profits, no royalty is due. Royalties are
      payable to "Project Gutenberg Association/Carnegie-Mellon
      University" within the 60 days following each
      date you prepare (or were legally required to prepare)
      your annual (or equivalent periodic) tax return.

      WHAT IF YOU *WANT* TO SEND MONEY EVEN IF YOU DON'T HAVE TO?
      The Project gratefully accepts contributions in money, time,
      scanning machines, OCR software, public domain etexts, royalty
      free copyright licenses, and every other sort of contribution
      you can think of. Money should be paid to "Project Gutenberg
      Association / Carnegie-Mellon University".

      *END*THE SMALL PRINT! FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN ETEXTS*Ver.04.29.93*END*

      The Prince

      by Nicolo Machiavelli

      Translated by W. K. Marriott

      Etext prepared by John Bickers, jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz
      and Bonnie Sala, Sterling Editing Services, clio@uscom.com

      Nicolo Machiavelli, born at Florence on 3rd
      May 1469. From 1494 to 1512 held an official
      post at Florence which included diplomatic
      missions to various European courts.
      Imprisoned in Florence, 1512; later exiled and
      returned to San Casciano. Died at Florence on
      22nd June 1527.

      INTRODUCTION

      Nicolo Machiavelli was born at Florence on 3rd May 1469. He was the
      second son of Bernardo di Nicolo Machiavelli, a lawyer of some repute,
      and of Bartolommea di Stefano Nelli, his wife. Both parents were
      members of the old Florentine nobility.

      His life falls naturally into three periods, each of which singularly
      enough constitutes a distinct and important era in the history of
      Florence. His youth was concurrent with the greatness of Florence as
      an Italian power under the guidance of Lorenzo de' Medici, Il
      Magnifico. The downfall of the Medici in Florence occurred in 1494, in
      which year Machiavelli entered the public service. During his official
      career Florence was free under the government of a Republic, which
      lasted until 1512, when the Medici returned to power, and Machiavelli
      lost his office. The Medici again ruled Florence from 1512 until 1527,
      when they were once more driven out. This was the period of
      Machiavelli's literary activity and increasing influence; but he died,
      within a few weeks of the expulsion of the Medici, on 22nd June 1527,
      in his fifty-eighth year, without having regained office.

      YOUTH
      Aet. 1-25--1469-94

      Although there is little recorded of the youth of Machiavelli, the
      Florence of those days is so well known that the early environment of
      this representative citizen may be easily imagined. Florence has been
      described as a city with two opposite currents of life, one directed
      by the fervent and austere Savonarola, the other by the splendour-
      loving Lorenzo. Savonarola's influence upon the young Machiavelli must
      have been slight, for although at one time he wielded immense power
      over the fortunes of Florence, he only furnished Machiavelli with a
      subject of a gibe in "The Prince," where he is cited as an example of
      an unarmed prophet who came to a bad end. Whereas the magnificence of
      the Medicean rule during the life of Lorenzo appeared to have
      impressed Machiavelli strongly, for he frequently recurs to it in his
      writings, and it is to Lorenzo's grandson that he dedicates "The
      Prince."

      Machiavelli, in his "History of Florence," gives us a picture of the
      young men among whom his youth was passed. He writes: "They were freer
      than their forefathers in dress and living, and spent more in other
      kinds of excesses, consuming their time and money in idleness, gaming,
      and women; their chief aim was to appear well dressed and to speak
      with wit and acuteness, whilst he who could wound others the most
      cleverly was thought the wisest." In a letter to his son Guido,
      Machiavelli shows why youth should avail itself of its opportunities
      for study, and leads us to infer that his own youth had been so
      occupied. He writes: "I have received your letter, which has given me
      the greatest pleasure, especially because you tell me you are quite
      restored in health, than which I could have no better news; for if God
      grant life to you, and to me, I hope to make a good man of you if you
      are willing to do your share." Then, writing of a new patron, he
      continues: "This will turn out well for you, but it is necessary for
      you to study; since, then, you have no longer the excuse of illness,
      take pains to study letters and music, for you see what honour is done
      to me for the little skill I have. Therefore, my son, if you wish to
      please me, and to bring success and honour to yourself, do right and
      study, because others will help you if you help yourself."

      OFFICE
      Aet. 25-43--1494-1512

      The second period of Machiavelli's life was spent in the service of
      the free Republic of Florence, which flourished, as stated above, from
      the expulsion of the Medici in 1494 until their return in 1512. After
      serving four years in one of the public offices he was appointed Chancellor and Secretary to the Second Chancery, the Ten of Liberty
      and Peace. Here we are on firm ground when dealing with the events of
      Machiavelli's life, for during this time he took a leading part in the
      affairs of the Republic, and we have its decrees, records, and
      dispatches to guide us, as well as his own writings. A mere
      recapitulation of a few of his transactions with the statesmen and
      soldiers of his time gives a fair indication of his activities, and
      supplies the sources from which he drew the experiences and characters
      which illustrate "The Prince."

      His first mission was in 1499 to Catherina Sforza, "my lady of Forli"
      of "The Prince," from whose conduct and fate he drew the moral that it
      is far better to earn the confidence of the people than to rely on
      fortresses. This is a very noticeable principle in Machiavelli, and is
      urged by him in many ways as a matter of vital importance to princes.

      In 1500 he was sent to France to obtain terms from Louis XII for
      continuing the war against Pisa: this king it was who, in his conduct
      of affairs in Italy, committed the five capital errors in statecraft
      summarized in "The Prince," and was consequently driven out. He, also,
      it was who made the dissolution of his marriage a condition of support
      to Pope Alexander VI; which leads Machiavelli to refer those who urge
      that such promises should be kept to what he has written concerning
      the faith of princes.

      Machiavelli's public life was largely occupied with events arising out
      of the ambitions of Pope Alexander VI and his son, Cesare Borgia, the
      Duke Valentino, and these characters fill a large space of "The
      Prince." Machiavelli never hesitates to cite the actions of the duke
      for the benefit of usurpers who wish to keep the states they have
      seized; he can, indeed, find no precepts to offer so good as the
      pattern of Cesare Borgia's conduct, insomuch that Cesare is acclaimed
      by some critics as the "hero" of "The Prince." Yet in "The Prince" the
      duke is in point of fact cited as a type of the man who rises on the
      fortune of others, and falls with them; who takes every course that
      might be expected from a prudent man but the course which will save
      him; who is prepared for all eventualities but the one which happens;
      and who, when all his abilities fail to carry him through, exclaims
      that it was not his fault, but an extraordinary and unforeseen
      fatality.

    39. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Computer! · · Score: 2

      Speaking as an orthodox Jew, I think you're a little off base when you compare our treatment of women with that of extremist muslim governments.

      Of course I am, or that sentence would have started "Speaking as an extremist Muslim...". I was close, though, in that Jewish women are treated differently than Jewish men, and that's part of how you worship God.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    40. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as an orthodox Jew, I think you're a little off base when you compare our treatment of women with that of extremist muslim governments.
      Of course I am, or that sentence would have started "Speaking as an extremist Muslim...". I was close, though, in that Jewish women are treated differently than Jewish men, and that's part of how you worship God.

    41. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by ajmarks · · Score: 1

      OK, I can accept that.

      --
      Opinions are not Informative, though they may be Insightful or Interesting.
    42. Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to late, you sound like an asshole. Fuck you bitch ass fucking cunt licker pussy motherfucka! Bitch pussy cock sucks mother! Ass face smell shit head lick dick masturbator!

      asdi had! (Score:0)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 27, @03:30AM (#2618178)
      by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 26, @07:08PM (#2616602)
      gly as there is more or less ability in him who has acquired
      the state. Now, as the fact of becoming a prince from a private
      station presupposes either ability or fortune, it is clear that one or
      other of these things will mitigate in some degree many difficulties.
      Nevertheless, he who has relied least on fortune is established the
      strongest. Further, it facilitates matters when the prince, having no
      other state, is compelled to reside there in person.
      But to come to those who, by their own ability and not through
      fortune, have risen to be princes, I say that Moses, Cyrus, Romulus,
      Theseus, and such like are the most excellent examples. And although
      one may not discuss Moses, he having been a mere executor of the will
      of God, yet he ought to be admired, if only for that favour which made
      him worthy to speak with God. But in considering Cyrus and others who
      have acquired or founded kingdoms, all will be found admirable; and if
      their particular deeds and conduct shall be considered, they will not
      be found inferior to those of Moses, although he had so great a
      preceptor. And in examining their actions and lives one cannot see
      that they owed anything to fortune beyond opportunity, which brought
      them the material to mould into the form which seemed best to them.
      Without that opportunity their powers of mind would have been
      extinguished, and without those powers the opportunity would have come
      in vain.
      It was necessary, therefore, to Moses that he should find the people
      of Israel in Egypt enslaved and oppressed by the Egyptians, in order
      that they should be disposed to follow him so as to be delivered out
      of bondage. It was necessary that Romulus should not remain in Alba,
      and that he should be abandoned at his birth, in order that he should
      become King of Rome and founder of the fatherland. It was necessary
      that Cyrus should find the Persians discontented with the government
      of the Medes, and the Medes soft and effeminate through their long
      peace. Theseus could not have shown his ability had he not found the
      Athenians dispersed. These opportunities, therefore, made those men
      fortunate, and their high ability enabled them to recognize the
      opportunity whereby their country was ennobled and made famous.
      Those who by valorous ways become princes, like these men, acquire a
      principality with difficulty, but they keep it with ease. The
      difficulties they have in acquiring it rise in part from the new rules
      and methods which they are forced to introduce to establish their
      government and its security. And it ought to be remembered that there
      is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct,
      or more uncertain in its success, then to take the lead in the
      introduction.
      [ Reply to This | Parent ]

      herotodus (Score:0)
      by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 26, @06:46PM (#2616509)
      [ Reply to This | Parent ]

  107. Made Up? by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2



    Is it just me or does this whole thing seem made up? I mean if I had been asked in the 5th grade to "write a fictitional account of what you think the NOW somewhat free children would do since the meanies have left town..." I could have came up with something really similar to this.

    Dear Slashdot: "I love this freedom thing. My day went something like this: I dug up my trusty old C64 to surf the web a bit and download movies. I then spent a few minutes getting caught up on kernal patches -- (man that Linus guy sure is fast). Next I thought I would watch a little baywatch and break out the old Madonna posters. Later on I got together with my friends to go grab a coke and sub at the local deli, and then we all go out and rent this months versions of the re-released star wars movies.....life again is good!"
    THE END.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  108. What if... by houston_pt · · Score: 1

    Just a loose thought in the middle of all these raving rants...
    What if this mail was real, coming from Afghanistan but it had been written by someone that actually had access to a PC relatively updated, someone whith the money and freedom in that land, someone from the old taliban government?
    This might be more a distraction than a hoax...

    --
    coffee | nose > keyboard ©
    1. Re:What if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, someone from the "old Taliban" would truly have something to gain by writing this. After all, this "distraction" might make the US forces back off! Hell, a "distraction" of this magnitude could be a pivotal event that allows the Taliban to retake power! Brilliant deduction, Mr. Holmes! However do you come up with these gems?

  109. Not at first but, by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    After a while the taliban relented and started allowing female doctors to practice again. I guess they realized the problem when their wives and daughters started getting sick...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  110. I thought the Osama South Park episode was bad... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    But then Jon Katz comes along, and shows them who really is king when it comes to half-assed, inane leftist propaganda for half-assed, inane leftist propaganda's sake. I don't know what's worse, that I was expecting an Osama with a canadian style mouth having homosex with Satan, or that Katz is still allowed to have anything to do with Slashdot. C'mon, did he manage to get you drunk and sign a 30 year contract?

  111. No, Amiga owners never called them Commodores by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

    Every Amiga owner I've known has called them Amigas, never as Commodores. They were adamant that their multi-tasking, awesome sound and graphics Amigas were not mistaken for the simple little more than a console system that was the C64 that the rest of us had.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  112. if its on the internet it must be true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe all email forwarded to me, if its on the internet it must be true!

  113. Not always possible to stay in the US. by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    The American government prevents this somewhat, by allowing way more student visas then immigration visas. So while it's easy to get into the US to study, it's not always so easy to stay and get a job afterwards. So a lot of people do go back.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  114. I want to see the email headers. by melvin22 · · Score: 1

    I don't think I know enough about networking to do something useful with them myself. But I do believe that people here on /. have the skill and the means to figure out if the header information is true, and maybe find out where the sender is (assuming the headers are real..). Since our friend JK said he knows the places that the message had to go through to get to him, I thought it would be nice to see someone who knows what they are talking about corroborate his story. Personally, I think the whole thing is big pile of cow-dung. But that's just me...

    1. Re:I want to see the email headers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Katz already covered his ass by saying the email came "by way" of various places. So now Katz will be able to say, sorry, there's no email headers here.. "just trust me on this one".

  115. Movies on a C64? by ocie · · Score: 2

    I have to applaud the resourcefulnes of the Afgan programmers. Downloading and playing movies on a C64 sounds very difficult.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  116. He must really be bored there... by quincy_MD · · Score: 1

    if the first thing he does is email Katz!

  117. Commodore Sold PC Clones in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guys,

    FYI; if I'm not mistaken, Commodore made PC clones in Europe for several years, so don't automatically assume that this guy is referring to an old Commodore 64, and automatically judge this story as phony. There's a chance that he might've dug up an old 486 or Pentium 90, and sent out an email on a 2400/9600 baud modem.

  118. Re:Please read this : help /., stop karma whores by joel8x · · Score: 1

    you have way too much time on your hand, probably because "Many posters on slashdot describe themselves as nerds or geeks, societal outcasts. Posting to slashdot is their only true sense of community, and they view karma as a measure of popularity or status." get a life.

    Whore me up!

    --
    Sound waves should be free!
  119. Re:Please read this : help /., stop karma whores by MrPerfekt · · Score: 1

    There will be no valid comments to a post that was already not valid. For example, anything by Jon Katz. Well, that's just my opinion anyway. Perhaps some would agree with me.

    --
    I just wasted your mod points! HA!
  120. Well by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    There have been reports (well one report that I've heard, actually) of a guy who dug up his big-screen TV after the taliban fled Kabul. It may have been a trend, after all it's not like people in the US can't get their hands on drugs despite the hard line our government has taken on them.

    Kabul also has electricity and some telephone access. I seriously doubt someone in a village 'suburb' or Kabul would have access to those things.

    And yeh, slashdot? (which wasn't very popular in 1996) The Microsoft case (which hadn't started in 1996) the iPod!?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  121. Payback's a bitch by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    "The ministry of communication is duty-bound to make the use of the Internet impossible."
    - Some taliban government official, quoted in an article on wired.com, summer 2001

    "The internet interprets censorship and routes around it, although occasionally it takes a little longer and involves a bit more busting of heads than John Gilmore of the EFF might originally have imagined."
    - Some guy in Afghanistan, November 2001.

  122. New category in the FAQ! by cadfael · · Score: 1
    From the FAQ
    Why didn't you post my story?
    This is a tough one.

    Slashdot gets hundreds of submissions every day. Every day our authors go through these submissions, and try to select the most interesting, timely, and relevant ones to post to the homepage. There are probably as many reasons for stories to get rejected as there are stories, but here are some of the more common ones:

    Badly worded subjects
    Broken or missing URLs
    Confusing or hysterical sounding writeup
    It might be an old story
    It might just be a busy day and we've already
    posted enough stories Your story just might not be interesting!
    This now needs a new addition...

    Your story is not true
    You are John Katz
    All of the above
    Any of the above

    Come on guys, THINK about what you are posting. This is horse crap, you know it now, and you should have known it before this went on the front page. Frankly, I expect you pull this story until you can substantiate it or post a retraction.

    --
    -- The Hollow Man
    Non illegitimati carborundum
  123. Does Jon Katz think himself a modern Franklin? by braddock · · Score: 1

    You know, Ben Franklin used to pull this type of crap all the time, both in the colonies when trying to rally support against the UK, and in France where he had published outrageous lies about British soldiers massacaring women and children during the war to boost French support in money and aid.

    Is Katz thinking himself grand and trying to do likewise for the "benefit of society"? Thinking "if it just saves one childs life by making the slashdotters support aid to those Afghan geeks"? And trying to anti-globally disgust us with the tounge-in-cheek suggestion of Afghans watching Temptation Island. urgh..

    I would really like a statement from Katz on this.

    Silence Dogood

  124. no one makes them watch... by kninja · · Score: 1
    They choose to watch the shows, no one forces them to watch. The taliban certainly didn't.


    I choose not to watch TV most of the time, and most people are OK with that. Certainly no one forces me to watch it. The occasional show slips through. But I still haven't seen survivor...

  125. Commodore made Intel PC's as well by itwerx · · Score: 2

    They had several 8088-based PC's before they went under.
    'Course his movies would be playing at about 1-fph (one frame per hour)... Worse torture than anything the Taliban ever came up with! :)

  126. "Commodore" "C64" ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone seems to be assuming that "Commodore" is synonymous with the C-64. But, although they never had any significant presence in the U.S. PC market, Commodore was until its end a manufacturer of PC "clones" as well. So the "ancient Commodore" could well be a 486 machine -- hardly optimum, but workable.

  127. wishful thinking.... by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    of course there's just enough holes in this story to keep anyone from being able to determine whether it's even based on truth or not from only the information here, but i truly hope that either way, there ARE stories of this sort happening in Afghanistan, and that stories such as this aren't just a lot of well-intentioned hogwash designed to keep the american public from realizing that dispite the fact that we're about to win vietnam here, it's going to be a hell of a lot harder to live with afterwards this time.

  128. Internet Access in Afghanistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What Katz should have said was that this dude is dialing up CompuServe on his Iridium phone...

    He's probably hAx0ring pR0n on Bearshare right now...

  129. If Katz has contact with this guy, how about a Q&a by sho-gun · · Score: 1

    How about a Q&A session with this guy? If Katz has a way to email him, and if this whole thing is real, I'm sure there's a bunch of folks out
    there who sincerely want to hear about life
    in Afganastan under Taliban rule, without all
    of the media fluff.

    What do ya say slashdot? Katz? (And yes, I submitted this as a story idea too.)

  130. dumbass by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    There is neither sand nor oil in afghanistan.

    Maybe you should learn something before spouting your ignorant head off.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  131. Inevitable? Free? by W.B.+Yeats · · Score: 1

    Your first line is moronic. Define your terms. Is this what you mean:

    Open and free information just like CNN and MTV?

    Inevitible just like the Wired pronouncements of a Dow Jones at 25,000?

    Such a corporate monkey.

    FU and all you stand for.

    --

    And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
    Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

  132. Internet in Afghanistan highly doubtful by absurd_spork · · Score: 5, Informative

    I spent some time in Uzbekistan this October for academic reasons. Uzbekistan is not the most advanced place on Earth, but it's still light years ahead of what's left of Afghanistan with regards to telecommunications infrastructure.

    Now, in Uzbekistan I had quite trouble getting Internet access outside the larger cities such as Samarqand or Tashkent; in rural areas, where you've partly still got manually switched telephone lines, you can just about forget it. It's Soviet telecom infrastructure, basically.

    So how on Earth is this guy supposed to have Internet access in rural Afganistan where you can't even take it for guaranteed that there's electricity or running water, let alone toilets or telecom infrastructure? (All of this experienced in southern rural Uzbekistan.)

    So either this guy has a satellite phone and a generator hooked up to his ancient Commodore to download movies with, or he's in one of the rare villages with running telephone on a one-phone-per-village basis and continually occupies it for use with the 1200 baud acoustic coupler modem and his Commodore to download movies and inform himself about getting Linux on his Commodore, or this is just a hoax.

    The sad thing is that it's such a primitive hoax in the first place - just like the "technology conquers all" nerd variation of the romantic patriotic young outlaw theme.

    So unless I get to read the original e-mail including forward information some time soon, JonKatz goes down in the dumpster for me.

    1. Re:Internet in Afghanistan highly doubtful by barchibald · · Score: 2, Informative

      Doubtful? I had regular internet communication with relative TREKKING in the MOUNTAINS of Afghanistan just this past spring. Doubtful? I think not.

      He said it was not difficult to find internet access, although it was not predictable where he would find it, he managed to write every 3-4 days over a period of 3 months. It was always secretative, his messages were short, but he managed. I'm sure the american-ness helped people's willingness to open up their computers to him.

    2. Re:Internet in Afghanistan highly doubtful by absurd_spork · · Score: 1

      This is really interesting - as I said, I had trouble in rural Uzbekistan.

      Where exactly did he go, to Taliban-controlled areas or to the northern region? ("Mountains of Afghanistan" is not very specific :-)) And did he mention what manner of Internet access people had? I'd be interested for a scientific research project on Internet use in Muslim communities.

    3. Re:Internet in Afghanistan highly doubtful by SuzanneA · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps he's one of the few that uses packet radio over some sort of HAM equipment. There are HAM operators all around the world, and its the logical choice for internet access in areas that are 'remote'. Prior to the taleban there were probably no FCC-equivalent regulating HAM usage, and anyone with the ability to build/buy the equipment would be able to use it.

  133. Katz's hole by alienmole · · Score: 1
    So how do you explain the bit about downloading movies on a Commodore over a connection of unknown quality & bandwidth, to take just the most glaring problem with the story?

    As for the fact that Junis had allegedly emailed Katz before, if Katz wrote about that for Hotwired, perhaps someone trolled him using that knowledge. If so, it would qualify as the best /. troll ever!

    Either that, or Katz is exaggerating and adding details to suit his story, or simply completely inventing Junis - which would be even worse than if he was trolled. This is a hole out of which Katz cannot dig himself - he finally seems to have exposed his cluelessness and/or deceitfulness beyond any possibility of a plausible defense.

    Too many people want to validate conspiracy theories instead of debating the ideas Katz brings up.

    So let me get this straight: we're supposed to debate ideas Katz brings up as a result of being trolled? You claim he's a "respected geek journalist". There's only one problem with that - the article we're responding to has nothing in common with any kind of journalism. It has all the credibility of the original hoax that Katz seems to have fallen for. The only debate here is about what disrepute Katz brings to the term "journalist".

    1. Re:Katz's hole by StaticLimit · · Score: 2

      Thank you! It's certainly good to get the perspective of a professionally trained journalist (as I know you are from your assertion that Katz's article does not constitute journalism).

      I would take serious issue with your suggestion that whether or not Katz's article raises issues that could be thought about or debated rests entirely on the legitimacy of an email from Afganistan!

      It's really pretty shallow to suggest that the pervasiveness of technology, and the influence of American culture (in contrast to the influence of American bombs) is not an issue worthy of discussion. After all, its obvious that American culture and values (or lack thereof) is a major reason why al Queda and associates are so opposed to America. I think Katz definitely touches on the topic of American cultural imperialism here, among other things.

      Numerous people have brought up the possibility that it's an Amiga, not a C64 (and there's no evidence to support either an Amiga OR a C64). As for bandwidth and electricity, I seriously doubt if anyone here on Slashdot has any clue what kind of capacity there is on the outskirts of Kabul (other than CNN-based guesses)... I know I don't.

      And on your point that someone figured out that Junis responded to Katz while Katz was writing for Hotwired, then composed a hoax email, and forwarded to people in Islamabad who might forward to Katz (or spoofed the headers somehow), I can only say:
      The helicopters are coming. Hide your guns and DO NOT DRINK THE WATER ;)

      - StaticLimit

    2. Re:Katz's hole by alienmole · · Score: 2
      I would take serious issue with your suggestion that whether or not Katz's article raises issues that could be thought about or debated rests entirely on the legitimacy of an email from Afganistan!

      It's really pretty shallow to suggest that the pervasiveness of technology, and the influence of American culture (in contrast to the influence of American bombs) is not an issue worthy of discussion.

      You're really reaching here. Katz's entire article was predicated on the email. If he wanted to provoke discussion on the issues he's referring to, he should have discussed them without basing his article on an email of dubious provenance. As they say in the legal world, his article is fruit of the poisoned tree.

      Checking the facts upon which one's articles are based is a basic tenet of journalism, and all the evidence indicates that Katz has violated this. That is the premise upon which I base my assessment of Katz's capabilities as a journalist. The very fact that he posted something so questionable without a clearer explanation of the source or context, even if it is real, is poor journalism.

      Certainly, Katz might yet produce evidence backing up his suspicious story. Like others here, I am eager to see that, and will certainly post an apology in the unlikely event that I am wrong.

      I was wrong about one thing, though: Katz's latest blunder was clearly not beyond any possibility of defense, since you are defending it. I respect your trusting attitude, but I think you are very likely to be proved wrong. This has nothing to do with conspiracy theories, and everything to do with basic factual contradictions. I think the most likely theory is that Katz simply got carried away and exaggerated something beyond what could be sustained by the facts he had access to.

  134. amused... by TechnoVooDooDaddy · · Score: 1

    I would be greatly amused to find out that someone has been playing an extremely long and drawn out practical joke on Katz...

    1. Re:amused... by gfxguy · · Score: 1
      I can see it now...

      The email started off something like this:

      Dear Mr. Katz,

      You might remember me, I wrote you once while you were writing for Hotwire. [let's face it, if you were an author, would you remember some guy that wrote you a comment 5+ years ago?]

      My name is Junis, and I live in a small town 35 miles southwest of Kabul. [for some reason, I can't tell you the name of this town for fear of... uh... something or other] I just dug out my commodore computer, that's been burried under a chicken coop for five years, through harsh winters and harsher summers, and plugged it in and it worked. My friend, Aljabar, cranked up the forbidden generator for electricity.

      The first thing we did was surf the net, and get up to date as soon as possible, we looked at the top ten ranked shows from last week. Temptation Island will give us masturbation fantasy's for years!

      Even though I have a commodore[What? PC? Amiga?], I lust after the Apple iPod, because instead of concern for my fellow small villagers, whom I could feed for a year for the price of an iPod, I would rather have an iPod to impress the ladies, if you know what I mean...

      Anyway, it just sounds worse and worse every time I read it. I'd really like to see some more evidence that Jon didn't get a fantasy email. I mean, it'd practically be impossible to prove it either way, but post the email or something.
      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  135. Haha .. you poor Americans. (BTW, no one said C64) by SirSlud · · Score: 2

    Whether Katz is being accurate and honest here is up for debate, but what I love is the incredulousness. Like:

    What?! He can download movies? He knew about the MS case? Baywatch? Damnit .. it's imPOSSIBLE that he had those things, otherwise we might be forced to admit that the 'liberty' of being American really isn't that far off of many other places in the world. (Heck, do you really think a woman could be the president of the USA?)

    At any rate, it's absolutely infuriating to see Americans so indignantly resolute in their assuption that Afganistan = Backwards = No One has a Clue What Goes On in the Real World. They were under an oppressive rule, and could be KILLED for simple things like using computers. That doesn't mean they sat around for 8 years with their thumbs up their asses, waiting for the Americans to get pissed off at their leaders, only to 'liberate' them into a world of higher pop culture conciousness. Sheesh. No doubt some Afgans secretly kept short wave radios. It's possible that some of the US Army commandos are providing satillite uplinks (just a guess, probably not). There are LOTS of reasons why Katz' story could be true.

    When people talk about Americans being self-involved, this is what they are talking about! What bothers me is not whether Katz is being honest or not (and you don't really need to make up stories in times like this unless you're gunning for public support of military action or resctriction of civil liberties), but how people cannot ACCEPT things.

    Shit, it's not like the entire population of Afghanistan ICQ'd Katz 2 minutes after the Taliban were driven south.

    And Commadore made PCs .. no where did he say it was a 64

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  136. A little too much information there.. by MongooseCN · · Score: 2

    He's already made his way to some sex sites, and wishes he had a printer.

    That was a little too much information for me...

  137. OLD NEWS by Sinjun · · Score: 1

    Katz once again has discovered his own nose. The issue of Globalization is AGE OLD, but Katz seems to want us to believe he invented the idea, or at least that he is on the cutting edge. Globalization is something that was noticed by Nietszche for crying out loud and has been talked about for literaly over a hundred years. Come on Katz, if you're going to pretend to be origninal don't insult our intelligence by being so OBVIOUSLY in the debt of other, much more astute writers.

    1. Re:OLD NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "issue of Globalization is AGE OLD, but Katz seems to want us to believe he invented the idea, or at least that he is on the cutting edge. "

      I think you did not read, Part 1 of 2, Part 2 of 2, and Part 3 of 3 when Mr. Katz wrote on this topic. Its clear from the content that Mr. Katz did not write about globalization... Mr. Katz wrote about globalism. Clearly, Mr. Katz was ahead of the media curve b/c while we were all focused on globalization, he discovered the problems with globalism.

      As Mr. Katz points out with his other posts, this is a problem with the Old Media. The New Media sees these hidden interests and writes insightful commentary.

  138. Some security here? by MongooseCN · · Score: 2

    He claims American commandos are skulking around dressed as Northern Alliance tribesmen.

    Good thing that was just made public knowledge...

  139. I'm sad for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because you're obviously and unfunny idiot who's family is just as boring and stupid as you.

    But that dosn't mean I appreciate you posting your ned-flanders crap to slashdot.

  140. Re:Haha .. you poor Americans. (BTW, no one said C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, either you are particularly gullible and stupid, or you are just another boring troll. Either way, enjoy whatever you get out of this.

  141. The Original Message Text? by GreenJeepMan · · Score: 1

    Why wasn't the original message text printed? Or at least linked to?

    Is it out there somewhere?

  142. Welll... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you look at IBM's PCM site, they list 2 Commodore 286s and 4 Commodore 486s, and it's perfectly possible to upgrade a Commodore to some bastard Pentium chips. Of course he'd be limited to VESA video cards, probably, but it's completely possible to get Windows 95 running on one of those... or at least Linux.

    1. Re:Welll... by cynthetik · · Score: 1

      Also worth noting is that the Commodore brand name was used by Escom in Europe well into the Pentium era as a badge for generic PC clones. Most of the middle easts trade is with Europe and not the US so don't presume it's related to any of the Commodores you saw.

      --
      .sig .sig .sputnik
  143. Secret documents, smuggled out of Osama's cave by Wariac · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hi guys.

    We've all been putting in long hours but we've really come together as a group and I love that. Big thanks to Omar for putting up the poster that says "There is no I in team" as well as the one that says "Hang In There, Baby." That cat is hilarious. However, while we are fighting a jihad, we can't forget to take care of the cave. And frankly I have a few concerns.

    First of all, while it's good to be concerned about cruise missiles, we should be even more concerned about the scorpions in our cave. Hey, you don't want to be stung and neither do I so we need to sweep the cave daily. I've posted a sign up sheet near the main cave opening.

    Second, it's not often I make a video address but when I do, I'm trying to scare the most powerful country on earth, okay? That means that while we're taping, please do not ride your razor scooter in the background. Just while we're taping. Thanks.

    Third point, and this is a touchy one. As you know, by edict, we're not supposed to shave our beards. But I need everyone to just think hygiene, especially after mealtime. We're all in this together.

    Fourth: food. I bought a box of Cheeze-Its recently, clearly wrote "Osama" on the front, and put it on the top shelf. Today, my Cheeze-Its were gone. Consideration. That's all I'm saying.

    Finally, we've heard that there may be American soldiers in disguise trying to infiltrate our ranks. I want to set up patrols to look for them. First patrol will be Omar, Mohammed, Abdul, Akbar, and Richard.

    --
    Remember it, write it down, take a picture, I dont give a fsck!
    1. Re:Secret documents, smuggled out of Osama's cave by tdrury · · Score: 5, Informative

      This was blatantly ripped off from FuckedCompany.com. See the post here. Why not give credit where credit is due?

      -tim

    2. Re:Secret documents, smuggled out of Osama's cave by Wariac · · Score: 2, Informative

      I got it in email with no links...didnt know about it. Sorry, i should have mentioned how i came about it.

      Wariac

      --
      Remember it, write it down, take a picture, I dont give a fsck!
  144. hi mr. katz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is the easter bunny,
    i have a great price, ONLY FOR YOU, on this bridge in New York City..............

  145. Bu Bye Jon by gandalf_grey · · Score: 1

    Authors exclude = JonKatz. You are outta here.

    --
    Mmmmmmm. Floor pie!
  146. The question is, why? by CharlieG · · Score: 2

    Now the big question is WHY is the cost of living so high in the "Blue" areas? Could it be that you (we) are paying for those sophisticated items, and all the overhead that goes with them? I'd say yes

    --
    -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    1. Re:The question is, why? by daviddennis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Demand. Well-educated people are naturally drawn to Blue areas, and ignore the "opportunities" available in the cheaper Red ones. It's very much a cultural type of thing. Well-educated people also tend to have bucks, so housing prices are bid up big-time.

      The huge downside, of course, is that only the Blues that are wildly successful have even what might be considered a middle-class lifestyle in Red-land. I think this may be why many Blues have leftist voting records; they don't think of themselves as rich, even though technically they have lots more money than the rest of the country. I'm personally conservative because I deeply resent the government's share of my income, in view of the exceptionally poor quality of most government services. Because we have a progressive tax structure, "rich" blues who still can't afford a half-decent house are penalized more than Reds who can.

      The sophisticated stuff does cost lots of money, but you can avoid it if you want, so that's not the total answer.

      As Daniel (the anonymous coward below this post) said, it's harder to buy stuff in the Red zone; you can't get ballet tickets, and you can't get fantastic ethnic foods. Those things balloon Blue budgets beyond all reason. In Redworld, you are more or less forced to live within your means.

      This is, of course, exactly why Blues are highly unlikely to venture into Redworld and be happy; we need (or think we need) that urban cornucopia of stuff.

      D

  147. Huh? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm sure you're right about poland, but I was only talking about china, you probably meant to respond to the poster I responded to.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  148. there once was this guy by rebug · · Score: 2, Funny

    who had no net access!
    no!
    You betcha! But then he got net access
    oh, well then. hoorah or something
    and he liked linux
    yay! that guy rocks
    and he also visited some sex sites
    uhm, isn't that kind of a weird thing to tell a reporter?
    he liked open source stuff. especially us, and especially not microsoft
    yay! that guy rocks

    --

    there's more than one way to do me.
  149. email maybe, but downloading movies? by alienmole · · Score: 1
    Remember Young ones. E-mail dosen't require direct internet access. People we exchanging e-mail over fido-net and USENET years before the internet was really accessable.

    Could someone point me to the URL for DIVX-over-SMTP???

    1. Re:email maybe, but downloading movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but it will have to be as an attachment :)

    2. Re:email maybe, but downloading movies? by modemboy · · Score: 1

      of course if the taliban had internet access before they left, which it sounds like they did, then most of the infrastucture is probably still there...

  150. Back stories. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Let hope he does not restart vy read the back stories on slashdot. He might gain the impression that yanks are xenophobic bigots.

  151. This article has a good point! by ehiris · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter if this article is true or not but the point it reaches is a fact!

    Are there any organizations that could raise up money to get computers and internet connections over there? People need to open and expand their minds there because you don't want anybody to fall back to being lied to by some fanatics!

    You can't give everybody there a computer but you can definately open series of internet cafes in central locations. Is that really that expensive? The cost for that is a lot lower then the cost of fanatics running around destrying buildings and killing people!

    I've got online with the help of an Organization that raised funds in that way (Soros foundation for an Open Society) while I was living in Romania and it helped me more then anything ever did.

    The access to real and true information is the ultimate in personal improvement!

  152. smells like propaganda to me. by ainsoph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So whats the deal? Katz is now a dupe of the man as well? Remember right after the 9/11 there was an email from muslim man circulating around the interenet? Yep.. Propaganda.

    So while Katz is airing out his complete crap about *nothing* in particular, nothing but a heart warming tale spun to augment the beard shaving, women baring their faces, and the possiblility that MTV is coming to Kabul soon. Lets not forget the reality of the situation:

    The Northern Alliance is a brutal regime as well. People welcomed the Taleban after being ruled by these losers.

    On the homefront, the administration is taking power in sweeping gestures whose effects will leave us reeling for possibly fewgenerations.

    Like the fancy stories you see above. People from the less fortunate countries in the world like Australia and Europe think our media is full of shit, and lying to us point blank.

    But never fear, America is the home of the free. The best country in the world dude. And all that shit.

    Anyway, just a reminder to use that search engine of yours and get the facts, see some other perspectives, especially now since Mr. Katz has obviously become a tool as well. Yeah maybe he was a tool before, but at least he had the power in his court to say something to Slashdot readers. I guess no more.

  153. Re:Haha .. you poor Americans. (BTW, no one said C by SirSlud · · Score: 2

    Actually, you kind proove my point. Being:

    How do you (or I) actually know?

    I guess your answer would be 'I do'.

    Case closed,
    QED

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  154. Bull all the way by damas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is obviously a fake. Afghanis watching Baywatch? A Linux-Loving geek from Kabul? Where the heck did you people come up with this stuff?
    Stupidity.inc?

    1. Re:Bull all the way by Da+Masta · · Score: 1

      Mod this up. That's the first thing that popped to mind when I read this article. I mean, what's he doing now, connecting to the net on his C64? Baywatch/Temptation Island in _Afghanistan_? I'm positive the date isn't 4/1 so what is it I'm missing here?

  155. Hollywoodization of Earth by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    I guess they have a passion for shows that don't bear the slightest resemblance to anything they recognize.

    If the US' ultimate objective is to get a world of Brittany Spears fans watching the same crappy shows and the same crappy movies endlessly consuming junk they don't need then living in the mountains doesn't look so bad after all. Guess the US won't be happy until Time-Warner-Microsoft-Viacom-Disney is happy.

    Why have a spiritual life when you can obscess about what team of millionaires is going to win some pointless championship? Who needs a meaningful life when you have T&A on the TV. Just let pop culture bandage over that hole in your soul!

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  156. Re:Forward This To Everyone In Your Address Book!! by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 1

    Or maybe the email was an Outlook Macro virus that deleted the story he actually really was working on... So he posted this instead

    --
    "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
  157. Hey Fnkmaster, must I remind you? by Lakers · · Score: 1

    Also the line about trying to download movies is definitely suspicious. At 9600 baud perhaps? OK, give them the benefit of the doubt, 28.8k. Doesn't sound too believable to me.

    Does anyone here not remember the days before broadband? Are you seriously telling me that no one here ever downloaded a movie or cd image over dial-up? I know I sure as hell did. It took days, but I still did it. Who's to say he's not doing the same?

  158. if i had no computer for 5 years..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First thing I'd do is find some high quality pr0n.

  159. Flamebait by gfxguy · · Score: 1
    We can ACCEPT things that make sense.

    This is slashdot, if it were real, it would have made more sense to discuss HOW he got Katz an email.

    One of the american soldiers let me compose an email on his laptop. He told me that, when he had the chance, he'd forward it to you...
    or
    While the americans are occupying our city, they've given us limited access to make international calls.

    Who calls their PC a commodore? Wouldn't you call it a PC? If it was an Amiga, wouldn't you call it an Amiga? And most of the other skeptics here are right...he wants an iPad? Downloading movies? Nobody argues it can't be done in Afghanistan, we're just arguing that it doesn't make sense this Junis guy did it.

    So while I can ACCEPT that computers exist in Afghanistan, and that people use them to surf the net, I can't accept that the first thing this guy does is look up what popular shows are, and cares about getting an iPad. I'd think he'd be reading CNN.com or something, trying to find out where he can order clothes or food instead of a new computer - the price of which could feed a village there for a year.

    We accept an awful lot, but you'd have to be blind to reality to accept this story.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
    1. Re:Flamebait by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      > I'd think he'd be reading CNN.com

      I really can't believe you can't see the difference between imposing your cultural/social/financial/etc context and values on someone else, only to use it as evidence that the story is unplausible. I'm not going to argue this .. (well, geez, the guy has been LIVING CNN.com for the last 8 years, I think the last thing he need to know is what is going on in the world)

      Also, consider that what he said he wants is heavily affected by who he's talking to. Katz used to work for wired; its only natural that Junis would want to diplay his 'withitness' to a former wired journalist.

      You see, you're only furthur proving my point, by placing your values, prioties and experiences over a world so far removed from yours that any attempt to judge is viewed by some people from other countries as completely self involved.

      The point is, everyone seems to be disproving Katz with evidence along the lines of:

      1. /I/ wouldn't do that!
      2. /I/ can't believe that!

      See, dog bites man happens every day, so it's not news. But dog bites man .. now THATS news. So, in this case, Afghan kid knows whats up in the world and wants an iPod. Thats NEWS, sadly enough, because it's unique. Interesting. I'm sure he did look at CNN.com, but is that news? Had he told that to Katz, Katz probably wouldn't have even mentionned it. (In fact, whos to say that he didn't?)

      ARG. Just comment on the story .. if you're so intent on surmising that anything out of your social norm is probably untrue, that's why you'll be standing still why the rest of the world flies by ya. You're not commenting on your neighbour down the street here.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
  160. "most powerful weapon" by caldodge · · Score: 1
    >If the world needed another demonstration of America's most powerful weapon --
    > not bombs or special forces but pop culture --
    >it got it again this week.

    America's culture is definitely a powerful force - but it was powerless in Afghanistan until we used a few _weaker_ weapons (B-52, etc.)

  161. The explanation is obvious by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

    The kid obviously has the first goat powered linux box on a C64.

    First he gets the goat going on the treadmill that powers the dynamo. Then he takes each ip packet and writes it down, mails it, Katz types them in, gets the replies, writes them down, then mails them back whereupon this guy types them into his machine and voila! High speed goat-herder porn!

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  162. Jon Katz will be.... by dorker · · Score: 0

    cryin' himself to sleep tonight on his huge pillah.

  163. Sin City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What with Las Vegas as its capital, American culture is more about satisfying your deepest, darkest desires (comeon, don't tell me you don't get a hardon seeing Natalie Portman, or Brittany Spears for some of you). Hell, we even let out our desires to murder people thru video games. We even get heavily involved in ebay auctions, bidding for even the stupidest of the stupid. Just to mention a few sins.

  164. Proof is the burden of the claimant by gosand · · Score: 2
    Please. The burden of proof falls on those making the claims. Any good skeptic will tell you that. Outrageous claims require outrageous proof. This was a sensational story from the start, look at the title of it! Why focus on the ideas that are brought up when the basic premise is questionable and sensationalistic?


    Why would a starving people who are having their country bombed give a rat's ass about Temptation Island? I am guessing that this is some form of sick advertising attempt, where Katz gets paid by companies to plug their wares in his stories. Hey, I don't have to prove that, right?

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  165. As someone living in south florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to know where you were having these radio difficulties :)

    Big annoying corporate stations pretty much rule from north west palm beach, down to the keys. and everywhere in between.

    1. Re:As someone living in south florida by daviddennis · · Score: 2

      (I could have sworn I wrote a response to this, but it appears to have vanished, or perhaps I forgot to hit submit while at home).

      I suppose it wasn't actually South Florida, but Central. I was going down the West Coast from Tampa to the Everglades and heard virtually nothing but preachers.

      In another Florida trip, I inhabited Palm Beach Gardens, went to Miami every weekend, and really loved it. I have to admit that I really loved the high-energy atmosphere in Miami, especially when tempered by the occasional Everglades boat trip. A cool place to live indeed.

      D

  166. What's wrong with that? by JohnDenver · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    After 5 years of not even catching a glimpse of CHEEKBONE, I would consider myself one gay-homosexual if I the first website I visited wan't www.17-year-old-dutch--lolitas-locked-in-a-69-lapp ing-each-others-little-hairy-peach-fishes.com

    Having not seen porn for 5 years, I would probably have sudden ejaculation episodes at random intervals throughout the day from the recently engrained image of two seventeen year old Dutch girls sucking on each others supple nipples as one of the girls lightly brushes the inner thigh of her classmate...

    CAN YOU IMAGINE NOT SEEING PORN FOR 5 YEARS!!!

    --
    "Communism is like having one [local] phone company " - Lenny Bruce
  167. This part I don't Doubt by Nf1nk · · Score: 1
    First I agree that the email is pure bull

    ....But this litle nugget would be the one part I believe is the bit about independence day

    I saw this movie in several rental facilities in Kuwait (subtitled, dubed and censored) complete with new boxes with Airbic script all over the outside

    Plus I read that same bit in my local paper

    yes its a hoax but I would imagine you could rent Will Smith's movie in at least one store in Afganistan

    --
    I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
  168. Don't use fiction to justify politics by ruzel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fiction is fiction, and by itself, that's fine. What's really wrong with this picture is that Jon Katz is using ficiton to justify a point about how great popular culture is. If the story is false, then the point is moot.

  169. The pursuit of happiness ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... drives life and liberty. Prooven once again via letters from Kabul. Hard code that!

    - G.D.

    P.S. I love the social-technological content these days. I might actually start to login again.

  170. Somewhere..... by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2

    Cmdr. Taco must be rolling in his grave to see such fake jibberish being posted on slashdot.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    1. Re:Somewhere..... by talks_to_birds · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Cmdr. Taco must be rolling in his grave..."

      No shit!

      Taco's *dead*!!?!

      Fsck!

      Where the hell have I been...?

      t_t_b

      --
      I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
  171. Re:Haha .. you poor Americans. (BTW, no one said C by yzquxnet · · Score: 1

    Things that generally do not seem plausable are usually not.

    It is very well possible that this Junis character may have indeed sent out that E-mail. But given that nature of technology and its use in afganistan, particularly rural Afganistan, it becomes more and more improbable that such events actually took place.

    Hence all the sceptisism.

  172. PysOps by Martin+S. · · Score: 2

    Some posters seem to think that this is a troll, or hoax rather than a real hacker, because it full of the classic signs of Social Engineering, false familiarity, overtly complementary, appeals to empathy, it's almost a classic.

    I'll tell you what this old cynic thinks, this is a PysOp's plant not a troll.

  173. It's actually worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because of how sincerely he reports to feel for this guy.

  174. whats to be skeptic about? by TurboNerd · · Score: 1



    >..20meg divx..
    who said he was downloading 20 meg divx movies??? Im sure it would be more along the lines of a .5 meg mpg or something along those lines. For all you know he could consider an animated gif he saw a movie.

    I can certainly remember downloading and viewing movies circa 1996 (the age of his computer)... i am sure that i wasnt the only one.

    >..As for digging up all the forbidden stuff as soon while they could still see the dust from the trucks of the talibans, that is just plain unbelievable..

    Also the Taliban are insignificant compared to Communist Romania. The Taliban have been in power for 5-6 years and most of the citizens can remember the time before the taliban and the freedoms they once had (not sure on how different it was but it WAS different). So they are pretty quick to get back to them im sure. Not to mention a computer nerd getting back to his computer. How many of you 'TurboNerds' would RUSH back to your computer after 5 days (let alone 5 years). I am sure after 5 years, eager is an understatment for this guys feelings towards getting back at his computer.

  175. "Facts" on Afghanistan by Western+Light · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to CIA factbook...

    1 The number of ISPs in Afghanistan (as of 2000)

    NA The number of Internet users

    10 The number of TV stations

    100,000 The total number of TVs

    14.7% The infant mortality rate

    31% Literacy rate

    $800 GDP per capita in 2000 (estimate)

    Telephone system: general assessment: very limited telephone and telegraph service

    domestic: in 1997, telecommunications links were established between Mazar-e Sharif, Herat, Kandahar, Jalalabad, and Kabul through satellite and microwave systems

    international: satellite earth stations - 1 Intelsat (Indian Ocean) linked only to Iran and 1 Intersputnik (Atlantic Ocean region); commercial satellite telephone center in Ghazni

  176. Holes, holes, holes by Watcher · · Score: 1
    and there's already a lot of talk about "Survivor."

    OK, um, first of all, why would someone in the middle of a war zone want to watch Survivor? OK, great, I'm going to watch a show about people manipulating, betraying, and starving after having been through 5 years of Taliban rule.

    Next this guy will claim to have gotten to a modern website with a browser written in 1996 on a Commodore (lets hope its at least a very late model Amiga).

    Meanwhile, he's especially eager to get his hands on the Apple iPod, and has been drooling over the Apple website site since he got back online.

    Yep, there we are, going to the Apple website was one of the first things he did after being free of the Taliban. Right up there with getting all those movies he missed? Right. As an aside, this guy must have had some serious cash to have an Amiga system in that country.

    Yet again, Mr. Katz has proven to be overzealous. Or very, very gullible.

  177. NOT NOW JON by MontyP · · Score: 1

    hold on jon
    i think there's something good on
    i used to read books but .....
    it could be the news
    or some other abuse
    or it could be reusable shows ....

    --


    There is no .sig
    1. Re:NOT NOW JON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you will quote the Pink Floyd song from
      The Final Cut

  178. Katz? .....do you read the responses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KATZ. Do you read the responses you generate? Or do you profess you r opinion and move on to "research" new postings. So do you have any evidence? It seems highly improbable for the events to have happened as you say. If I was living in Afganistan I would be working on bringing in food and medical supplies not TV's, VCRs, and Walkman's. This UberAfgan (IF true) takes hacking to a new level and he should be hired by the CIA.

    Also... When I met you you seemed "child molesterish." You even invited us (a few other students) out for pizza! Has anyone else had the same experience? Why is everything with Katz revolve around kids?

    1. Re:Katz? .....do you read the responses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a JonKatz interview out there on some site, I don't recall which one. It may be worth a search b/c:

      Katz claims that people who flame him are between 13 and 17 and

      He gets constructive responses via email (only).

      He does seem a little preoccupied with children's rights. A few months ago he wrote a piece on sneaking kids into an R rated movie. It gave me the creeps.

      I have a three year old son and a ten month old daughter. I'm rather liberal by most political standards, but I would not trust Katz to be the champion of my kids causes.

  179. Junis e-mailed me too! by dedicke · · Score: 0, Funny

    Jon Katz is not wrong guys! Back when I was working with Al Gore trying to "connect computers" up to one another to form some kind of web, Junis e-mailed me! He had just fired up his cold-fusion powered Altair and told me there would be trouble soon! Anyways...

    He finally dug up his Commodore 64, and as soon as he quit playing w/ that program that could make your floppy drive make music w/ the motor noise - he sent me a message!

    It seems that he had been lucky enough to hide an extra Sat phone in the chicken coop and had modified it to reach near 1gb data transfer rates! While he was mailing me he was simultaneously watching some bootleg porn and downloading the new Britney Spears! He had to go tho, he was entering his credit card info on apple.com to get that sweet new Ipod!...

    etc...

    JonKatz - GO TO HELL. You are an idiot.

    --
    raretshirts.com - cool vintage t-shirts
  180. So how do we contact somebody in Afghanistan? by Biker+Jim · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems for all this talk about the information age we still can't get in contact with people in a war zone like Afghanistan to get at least their opinion of the situation. I've been wanting to talk with the Afghani "man in the street(rubble?)since 911. In a situation like this how do you go about it? Was anybody able to get in touch with any Afghani Geeks?

    1. Re:So how do we contact somebody in Afghanistan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bless you my child. Given that your post does not criticize the stupidity of the story, you just got yourself some karma. Hey, I hear you can trade karma points for gadgets at some retail outlets. You should consider going ahead and exchanging your hard-earned currency for an iPod and send it to Jumis, peace be upon him, yeah, for he is truly deserving of our mercy, just like Billy The Boy Who Had No Body.

  181. Just a reminder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a good reminder that there are dumb, backward thinking, gullible people everywhere...

    And Fnkmaster is one of them.

    Why is it a good reminder if you yourself think it sounds like a hoax.

  182. Dogpile on the Yankees over here! by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


    Hey international kids! Wanna Troll for Americans? WELL, STEP RIGHT UP! This is the inflammatory thread for YOU!

    Here, uh, I'll start it up...

    You think you're perfect! Take that, George! You export crap culture! Annnd your women are fat! They make bad television like Ricky Lake!
    Take that yankee swine! You son of a motherless goat!

    Honestly, in the last two days it feels like /. has been invaded by petulant Europeans that sit around all day and moan.

    1. Re:Dogpile on the Yankees over here! by Estimator · · Score: 1

      If you really want to feel morally superior, you should point out that the US was on the verge of cancelling Baywatch (nobody here liked it or watched it), but all of the fans in Germany rescued the show.

      People don't seem to realise that the shows that transfer abroad aren't likely to be the intelligent shows. Shows pitched at a higher level often require a lot of cultural information that just isn't applicable to, for example, Britain. Or, the more intelligent shows require a superior grasp of the language.

      This is one of the reasons Hollywood is so smart. They know that it does not pay to make too complicated a plot, because, if they do, the film will not play well in Tokyo. I learnt this lesson the hard way. I came to the US from Britain. For some reason, PBS stations seem to think that Britain's "best" exports are "Keeping Up Appearances" and "Are You Being Served?". For me, that is deeply humiliating.

    2. Re:Dogpile on the Yankees over here! by LMCBoy · · Score: 2

      This is one of the reasons Hollywood is so smart. They know that it does not pay to make too complicated a plot, because, if they do, the film will not play well in Tokyo. I learnt this lesson the hard way. I came to the US from Britain. For some reason, PBS stations seem to think that Britain's "best" exports are "Keeping Up Appearances" and "Are You Being Served?". For me, that is deeply humiliating.

      It doesn't always work out that way. I, probably like most other USians, consider Britain's "best" TV export to be "Monty Python". This, despite the fact that MP is very smart, and very British.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    3. Re:Dogpile on the Yankees over here! by Estimator · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the curious thing is that Monty Python is considered quite passe in Britain. My father's generation still love it, but the rest of us moved on years ago.

    4. Re:Dogpile on the Yankees over here! by LMCBoy · · Score: 2

      Fair enough, but I think you must admit, it's orders of magnitude better than Are you being served? My only point was, intelligent, culture-specific entertainment can be successfully exported to other cultures. It isn't necessarily required to appeal to the lowest common denominator (although that often happens, of course).

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    5. Re:Dogpile on the Yankees over here! by Estimator · · Score: 1

      Yes, I guess my only point is that it's a lot harder than it first appears. For example, if I was to present an example of a reasonably intelligent British film that achieved broad appeal, I would talk about the Full Monty. I was very surprised that that particular film was so successful.

      For example, the choice of location (Sheffield) is very important, but I don't expect an American to understand why Sheffield is significant (although maybe I am wrong but Sheffield is hardly on the tourist trail unless you are a huge fan of the Human League).

      Maybe some of these misunderstandings would even cause an American to dismiss the Full Monty as just a mindless piece of fun.

      Given time, I am sure I could also come up with examples of shows that many Americans think of as intelligent, while the British think of them as trite. I know that I used to dismiss all American sitcoms as useless, but it just turned out I didn't get 50% of the jokes.

    6. Re:Dogpile on the Yankees over here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In germany 99% of tv-shows are dubbed and require
      no superior grasp of the language. Jokes are either
      translated or changed or dropped.


      Btw, we DO make our own stupid crap-shows too, we don't just import them from abroad! ;-)

  183. Okay, but why Independence Day?! by TopherC · · Score: 1

    Why did they have to pick such lousy examples of American pop culture? Stuff like Independence Day and Temptation Island isn't culture, it's cultural abuse for profit! It ashames me that this is the kind of stuff they are now yumming-up in Kabul, since it is the worst example of American culture IMHO.

    The price we pay for a free society in an information age is that we gradually build up resistances against media manipulation and other trash like this. For example, those happy-go-lucky commercials of the 60's and 70's seem ludicrous and silly to us these days, just bouncing off our thick armor of skepticism. But 30 years ago those commercials apparently worked!

    After some years of isolation, the people freed from Taliban rule may be hungry for all the trashy sensationalism that abounds in our society. But they may be lacking the ability to recognize the more subtle manipulation and propaganda prevalent in US media and pop culture.

    Or, maybe not. What do I know, I haven't lived in Afghanistan myself. Maybe these folks know how bad and stupid these movies and shows are, and are just watching them because they embody the those qualities thought "evil" by the Taliban. Even so, I am genuinely embarrased by this.

  184. Link to PsyOps by bstadil · · Score: 1

    Here is a Link for the ones like me that didn't know what PsyOps is.
    Quote" Definition of Psychological Operations: 'Psychological Operations: Planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of foreign governments, organizations, groups, and individuals. The purpose of psychological operations is to induce or reinforce foreign attitudes and behavior favorable to the originator's objectives. Also called PSYOP. See also consolidation psychological operations; overt peacetime psychological operations programs; perception management. ' US Department of Defense

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
    1. Re:Link to PsyOps by Minix · · Score: 1

      Very informative. Only one question: why only `foreign', in the above definition?

      --
      "There are four boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order." Ed Howdershelt
  185. goatse.cx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's already made his way to some sex sites, and wishes he had a printer.

    (someone tell him about the internet king.) downloading pr0n on a commodore? ouch.

  186. Two letters: BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the biggest load of J. Kats crap I've ever read.

    /. freakin' sucks, man...

  187. Laff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just want to say that I have never laughed so much from Slashdot as I have with this. First reading Katz's article had me giggling, now reading all the responses, I'm just about pissing my pants! This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever read.

    I've always thought people were too quick to jump down Katz's throat in the past, but now you can add me to that list. I thought this guy was supposed to be educated! What the fuck?!

  188. Give the Luddites a break (or a fair shake) by kaladorn · · Score: 1

    With all due respect, if I recall my history, the Luddites were not anti-technology per se, but they were against some of the negative effects of technology on the workforce and therefor one people.

    We may disagree with their assessment of the net effect of technology on the world, but we certainly can appreciate the fact that they were concerned about the negative impacts of technology (which we must admit, just as we trumpet the benefits). We can also agree I'm sure that not every technology has been implemented wisely nor with due forethought for its consequences.

    Luddites get a bad wrap because people have abused the term Luddite (taking it out of its historical context) in order to have a neat buzzword which means "anti-technological without reason or sense". The truth is, the Luddites may not have been entirely correct in their evaluation and they may have not understood the remedy to the problems created by technology, but neither were they blindly anti-technology.

    But that's just from my recollection. I could, in fact, be mistaken.

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  189. thats a long "feature" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i didnt know they stacked shit that high. he should seriouly look into spicing up his columns with goatse links.. or something

    1. Re:thats a long "feature" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gomer Pile!

  190. uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats because it's afghanistan. cd's are even banned.

  191. Is it April 1st already? by telstar · · Score: 1

    When is Afghanistan's April Fools Day?

    1. Re:Is it April 1st already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahaha!

  192. was there really a program that could do that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with the floppy? thats awesome. maybe i can find an afghan hotline server and get it on the DL!

    1. Re:was there really a program that could do that? by dedicke · · Score: 0

      Yes - my Uncle somehow had tons of bootleg C64 software back in the day - and I remember playing with that - it really made songs and stuff by high pitch noise from the disk drive - I didnt use it much because i was worried it was tearing up my disk drive.

      --
      raretshirts.com - cool vintage t-shirts
  193. Burden of Proof is on the shoulder of the claimant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please. The burden of proof falls on those making the claims. Any good skeptic will tell you that. Outrageous claims require outrageous proof. This was a sensational story from the start, look at the title of it! Why focus on the ideas that are brought up when the basic premise is questionable and sensationalistic?

    Example:
    Why would a starving people who are having their country bombed give a rat's ass about Temptation Island? I am guessing that this is some form of sick advertising attempt, where Katz gets paid by companies to plug their wares in his stories. Hey, I don't have to prove that, right?

    That unsubstantiated claim has just as proof as Katz's story; that is, none.

  194. Re:I want you by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1
    LOL

    Just promise to call me in the morning, OK?

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  195. Re:I thought the Osama South Park episode was bad. by darylb · · Score: 1

    Amen, brother. It's always good to know how "pop culture" is always the cause worth fighting for. What drivel.

  196. Re:WHOA! HAW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haw haw. Too funny.

    Katz better have something good ready for us...too many loose ends...

  197. Disgusting by Ogerman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To the operators of Slashdot:

    1.) Please remove this article at once. It is a filthy assortment of random lies and is an embarrassment to the /. community and the reputation of this site.

    2.) Please strongly consider firing Jon Katz for his lack of journalistic integrity. Better yet, decide via a Slashdot poll.

    3.) A major improvement to Slashcode would be a system by which readers can moderate the posting of articles on the main page.

    That being said, I am all for the overthrow of the Taliban regime and the restoration of the rights and freedoms of the Afghan people.

    1. Re:Disgusting by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2
      To the operators of Slashdot:
      1.) Please remove this article at once. It is a filthy assortment of random lies

      Agreed, JonKatz is full of crap.

      and is an embarrassment to the /. community and the reputation of this site.

      "reputation" of /. ? :-)

      2.) Please strongly consider firing Jon Katz for his lack of journalistic integrity. Better yet, decide via a Slashdot poll.

      Naah, it won't work, they'll end up firing CowboyNeal.

      3.) A major improvement to Slashcode would be a system by which readers can moderate the posting of articles on the main page.

      That'd be pretty good, it'd be a useful tell-JonKatz-what-you-think feature, and it would help weed out inept AskSlashdots too.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Disgusting by 0bjectiv3 · · Score: 1

      I would be interested in hearing some corroboration of your assertions. I'm sure it must pain you greatly to hear that something good has come of American foreign policy, and I'm as skeptical as the next guy, but you really need to support your claims. Otherwise, I think you'll be pigenholed as a knee-jerk naysayer.

      --

      "Saddam Hussein cavorts with terrorists."
    3. Re:Disgusting by HoaryCripple · · Score: 1

      3.) A major improvement to Slashcode would be a system by which readers can moderate the posting of articles on the main page.

      See scoop. Great moderation system.

    4. Re:Disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The articles on Kuro5hin are crap and the users are idiots.

    5. Re:Disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot will never fire Jon Katz, despite the fact that he continually produces meaningless drivel. The reason he'll stay? Look how many posts each JonKatz story gets. More posts = more money for /. Not saying it's wrong...I'd do the same myself.

    6. Re:Disgusting by cadfael · · Score: 1
      If only we were so lucky to have a shred of journalistic integrity here. I also would (and have) suggested this be pulled, but I doubt it will. A retraction would be nice, but again, I have my doubts.


      Perhaps its time for the folks who run this site to learn about the word "Oops!" Seriously, this story should have been shot down once the people running /. saw the copy on the screen. We are very quick to slam technological errors by big business, so lets be honest enough to admit when we screw up. C'mon, Rob et al, lets get this crap out of here...

      --
      -- The Hollow Man
      Non illegitimati carborundum
    7. Re:Disgusting by CoolVibe · · Score: 1
      Well... are you suggesting Malda switches over to something like this? No. Although I question the truthfulness of this story as well, Slashdot should not become a scoop site. Signal11 would have a fit, and Rusty and Inoshiro would split their sides laughing :-)

      Although being able to rate an article would be nice, if you ask me.

      But there's always the option of filtering JKatz stories of course, you know the drill.

  198. What happens now... by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The amount of drivel and backlash Katz stories generate here are just unbelievable, but even more astonishing is the "take-your-medicine-and-smile" attitude of /. towards this, shall we say, phenomena. No matter how much negative feedback a Katz story generates, he always gets front and center stage in this supposedly plural and open forum. While it is certainly possibly that /. is promoting the airing of different points of view by allowing him the amount of control he has over the editorial contents (and I don't say that lightly. How many of us get every single submission accepted?), in light of this I'm beginning to think that the /. folks see a Katz article as a sure ad revenue stream, at least for those of us that haven't pointed images.slashdot.com to 127.0.0.1. I might be wrong of course, but I'm at a loss to find any other explanation.

    This, however, should be the last straw. Please, pull John Katz off Slashdot. This story is ridiculous to the point of being scary. Katz has made an ass of himself - don't let him do the same thing to the site.

    This post will probably be modded down so as to sanitize the discussion (Off topic or Flamebait is anything that constructively criticizes Slashdot, along with the rest of the troll content), and so will many other that are trying to make a valid point. But just remember one thing:

    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

    ... comes after the story.

  199. Ever hear of Kent State? by RTHeath · · Score: 1

    It happened at Kent State not that long ago... You're correct that people may have a difficult time shooting at their own kids or siblings, but it has already been demonstrated that in the heat of the moment and in the right situation, there would be little hesitation to shoot somebody else's kid or sibling.

    1. Re:Ever hear of Kent State? by Associate · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between shooting unarmed extemist youth and heavily armed good old boys. Not that killing either is right. A gun pointed back at you always makes you think twice about popping your head out.

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
  200. For those that don't remember RFC 1149... by Nerftoe · · Score: 1

    For those that don't remember RFC 1149, it basically specifies a protocol for IP over avian carriers, CPIP (carrier pigeon internet protocol).

    There are details of of the first implentation of this protocol (including pictures) here...

    Funny Stuff.

  201. Combat, Rage, and Service by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1
    (Off topic, but...)

    Ironically, he never saw combat. He picked the Coastal Artillery for his specialty, never guessing that a little thing called an aircraft carrier would make big cannons on the beach obsolete. 'Spent the war in the Staes, itching for an invasion. Afterwards, he worked with a group that organized civilian governments to replace the ones the Nazis had left in Europe in all the towns. Briefly, he was also basically the postmaster for all of Europe (until the civilian postal services got rebuilt). Good administrator, but he always felt that it was the lack of combat duty that doomed him to colonel instead of the general's stars he felt he deserved.

    Unfortunately, he had more than enough rage to go around. He just vented it at family instead of the Enemy.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

    1. Re:Combat, Rage, and Service by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      well, that's what I get for assuming things, sorry.

      But, look at most any military and the prime method of motivation is to take a not-so-thoughtful young person (why do you think they like them straight out of high school) and to feed them BS about how evil the enemy is, (I mean, inherently evil, not just opposed to us), and then give him a gun and tell him where to shoot. By the time you're done with your propaganda he's so enraged that he doesn't care about the enemy's culture or how they're just people like us that look different, he just wants to kill.

      Teaching diversity will alleviate this, except - surprise! - last generation's soldiers have kids, and they get taught at home not to believe any of that "tolerance crap". Fear of their parents keeps them from internalizing the values of globalism. For each war, repeat one iteration.

      When you have a war every generation, like we've had for the last 150 years or so, then a whole hell of a lot of intolerance gets passed down.
      Yes, I've seen it, I'm from the south.

      So, in the end the whole exercise of globalism is a waste of time, but I guess it's the thought that counts.

    2. Re:Combat, Rage, and Service by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1
      No need to apologize - you made some very good points. I agree with you about the use of propoganda to "amp up" soldiers, especially green ones out of high school (although you have to wonder if the Internet and other information sources might be making them less green than they used to be).

      (Slightly off topic, but...) On the propoganda bit, have you ever read The Forever War by Joe Haldeman? It's a very transparent Vietnam analogy, but very, very good. At one point, the main character is subjected to subliminal conditioning/propoganda. As he's going into combat, he's subjected to these horrible images of the aliens eating babies and raping women and, even though logically he knows this is B.S. (our flesh is poison to them and why would they think our women were attractive?), he still believes it totally on an emotional level. A really disturbing idea, but it really gave me an appreciation as to how propoganda works (even though Haldeman wrapped it up in SF window dressing).

      --

      "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  202. Re:Haha .. you poor Americans. (BTW, no one said C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Whether Katz is being accurate and honest here is up for debate, but what I love is the incredulousness. "

    The burden of proof falls on those making the claims. You do not get it. It is simple. Katz has to prove his story. Has he offered this? No.

    We would have to be idiots if we were not incredulous. What he is asking us to believe is nothing short of incredible. We need strong proof to believe this aberration.

  203. Cover your eyes with mud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone who cannot argue on a weblog likes you use, "see you prove my point," and not explain how. How does he prove your point? Just saying it does not make it true.

    You are making the claim back it up. Katz is making a claim outside of what is expected, he should have evidence. He only has sensationalism and catchwords.

    I hope you are a troll, if not you would have to be real gullible or dim. They have a saying in China "You can not cover the sun with mud." You seem to like to cover your eyes with mud.

  204. Hahah by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    While he was mailing me he was simultaneously watching some bootleg porn and downloading the new Britney Spears!

    Just so you know, it wasn't the music he was downloading, but Spears' genome. Once he figures out to hook up his C64 to the genetic recombinator he hid in the barn... well, let's just say he won't be needing to download so much porn.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  205. No, I don't think the story is real either by nusuth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But many of you seem to be missing a point. Taliban did not ban internet or any other tech toys at first, they did this banning thingies after they controlled much of the afganistan and only gradually after that. IIRC internet was one of the last things on the ban list (presumably it was not very accessible anyway)

    --

    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

    1. Re:No, I don't think the story is real either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bless you my child. Given that your post does not criticize the stupidity of the story, you just got yourself some karma. Hey, I hear you can trade karma points for gadgets at some retail outlets. You should consider going ahead and exchanging your hard-earned currency for an iPod and send it to Jumis, peace be upon him.

  206. No kidding by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    This article is just ludicrous! It's damn funny. What'll probably happen is that the story will be removed from the front page, like some of /.s other major fuckups. (like when Michel ripped on a distributed project to help cure cancer, because it was being run by a corporation (Intel), without even bothering to contact the people who actually wrote the software.)

    I started out liking Katz (read him on hotwired, that's actually how I found slashdot), but he seems to just get stupider and stupider.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  207. I smell a hoax. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    Somebody out there must be busier than a one legged man in a butt kicking contest to be making up a hoax like this.

    This is a big hoax. Bigger even than the hoax about the MIT operating system Cesium that's supposed to contain year 3,000 technology that nobody on the same floor of that building ever heard of.

    On the other hand, can you give me his email address? I'd like to know how to watch movies on my Commodore.

  208. Cultural Narcotic by 4of12 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People all over the planet fuss about whether this healthy and democratic or corrupting and dehumanizing,

    American culture is all of those things.

    The tidal wave of American culture is frightening and Borg like.

    As long as it is seen this way, reactionary forces will gain support from the many who watch with despair as traditional culture and values developed over many centuries are replaced within a generation with what comes over satellite television from America.

    It's too bad we're incapable of giving the Afghans freedom, democracy and human rights without simultaneously injecting a huge dose of consumerism laced with appeals to lust and violence.

    Oh well, I suppose I can't fault the rest of the world for falling into the same traps that my fellow Americans have for decades. Don't like it? Don't watch it.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Cultural Narcotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Appeals to lust and violence?

      These are ploygamists whose national sport is a form of polo played with a decapitated calf and who en masse watch people getting unnecessary surgery as punishment for crimes.

      Really, I don't think they are going to be corrupted by Postal.

  209. Re:Burden of Proof is on the shoulder of the claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The burden of proof on this claim would most likely crush Katz's shoulder.

  210. Intensely hate foreigners, including USA by peter303 · · Score: 2

    They will tolerate USA interference for a short while to drive out the greater evil. Stay too long, and they'll be shooting at US soldiers too.

    They intensely hate the foreign components of the Taliban. Arabs and Pakistani Taliban who couldn't escape were summarily executed. Only Afgan Taliban were are being imprisoned.

  211. Let's all pitch in and get poor Junis his iPod by Sand_Man · · Score: 1

    It should be real easy. You all just send me $100 each, and I will make sure he gets it, then you all get 10 of your friends to send a $100 to you and........

    I am sure Junis will be posting hear soon, since he "is mesmerized by open source and Slashdot," and I am sure he will rally to Jon's defense and prove that this isn't a hoax.

    Jeez Jon, get that fish hook outa yo' mouth.

  212. Petition to give Katz the boot! by mondoterrifico · · Score: 0

    The guy writes crap, everybody here knows it.

    1. Re:Petition to give Katz the boot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sign here.

    2. Re:Petition to give Katz the boot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has 88 signatures so far. I think it can hit a few thousand.

  213. Have you considered... by bogusflow · · Score: 1

    That maybe the kid sent the email from a friend's PC (or a 'community' PC of sorts), and that the fact that he kept his Commodore hidden is only tangential to the story? As far as Net access is concerned, I've read stories of Taliban members who have (had?) satellite TV, CD players, you name it. Look at the New Republic from a week or two ago, there's a story that mentions a Talib with loads of contraband at home.

    Hey I hide my Commodore from my wife, so I can relate!

    --
    8 bit computing - It may be 2007 out there, but it's 1983 in here!!
  214. Where's the Original Email? by rusti999 · · Score: 1

    Instead of rephrasing the content, why not post the original email, including the header? It will be interesting to see how the email is actually routed.

  215. What is that smell! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm...

    I do believe that smell is shit!

  216. re: I'm not a criminal... by RTHeath · · Score: 1
    Basically, only people who were doing shady things to begin with lost freedom. I'm not a criminal so I don't give a shit if they have the right to wiretap all my phones - I'll never give them a reason to

    It's a lot easier to give up freedoms than achieve them, and once Big Brother's done with the terrorists, they'll be looking for a new enemy. And THEY define what a criminal is! Like a puff of sensi after a hard week's work? Sure you don't have any stray MP3's around that you didn't pay for? Maybe installed one too many copies of Windblows someplace without buying one CD per machine?

    Be careful when you say "I'm not a criminal" or "My government doesn't care about me."

    First they came for the Jews
    and I did not speak out
    because I was not a Jew.
    Then they came for the Communists
    and I did not speak out
    because I was not a Communist.
    Then they came for the trade unionists
    and I did not speak out
    because I was not a trade unionist.
    Then they came for me
    and there was no one left
    to speak out for me.

    -- Pastor Martin Niemöller

  217. bin laden VS. bill gates : the political cartoon by mozkill · · Score: 1

    bin laden VS. bill gates : the political cartoon

    just thought it was a good idea. it sorta combines certain social issues in the US.

    who really controls our country? the most powerful person in the US may not be George Bush... it is very likely Bill Gates. a cartoon such as this would bring the Microsoft DoJ case into a different light and possibly be a good example of what the Taliban hated about the US.

    just a thought.

    --

    -- Betting on the survival of the media industry is a serious risk. I advise investing elsewhere.
  218. Re:bin laden VS. bill gates : the political cartoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeezus H. Christ. Don't you fuckers ever think about anything else? Can't you get your tiny little minds off Microsoft and on to something more constructive?

    Fuck, I'm pissed at the lot of you. Get a goddamn life.

  219. Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Want to know how Afgans really feel? Then read this Reuters interview with a man named Golam. Here's the run-down: in the middle of the night today [Tuesday morning] American aircraft crashed a crate of food through his roof, destroying his home and trapping his 2 year old son in the rubble. The packages themselves split and scattered food everywhere, which was infuriating because Muslims of Golam's sect fast during the holy month of Ramadan and are only allowed to eat at sunset. Three other homes were demolished the same way. The packages were labeled "A Gift From the People of the United States of America". Some gift. Some people we are (being made to look like).

  220. So Now Slashdot is for Posting Propaganda? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF? So this story is fictional? And how are people to know that? Do the Taliban really kill people for having computers? Lame.

  221. I think this is how it actually went by zoombah · · Score: 1

    Some British dude does the following: freebsd-box$ telnet smtp.wackybritisp.net Connecting to smtp.wackybritisp.net 220 smtp.wackybritisp.net ESMTP MAIL FROM:&ltjunis@afghanistan.af&gt 250 OK RCPT TO:&ltkatz@morons.slashdot.org&gt 250 OK DATA 354 go ahead Hello Mr. Jon Katz. I am from Afghanistan, and you and your country have just liberated me. I am very in much liking your news stories. I love your journalistic style and am predicting that it will be the most popular in my country. I am wondering if you are able to send me apple ipod. Please send it to London, for my mail is being routed from London, to Islamabad, to Afghanistan. You are god of open source ^C freebsd-box$ lynx http://www.slashdot.org (breaks out into laughter)

  222. CIA factbook is a problematic source by absurd_spork · · Score: 5, Informative

    I wouldn't rely on information from the CIA World Factbook too much. The problem is mainly that it relies heavily on government sources. You can see this when you compare, for example, the literacy ratings for various countries. Most ex-Soviet countries are listed with 99 or near 99 percent, for example, which is a relic from Soviet times where they claimed the literacy rate to be 100%; they do have excellent literacy, but it's not quite that excellent. Now what sources did they have for Afghanistan? Do they list them anywhere? Are they credible?

    Another problem is that some figures are pretty difficult to estimate. Consider "Internet users", for example. For Uzbekistan, for example, it lists 42 ISPs and 7500 Internet users. How on earth did they get that number? What constitutes an "Internet user"? How do they count Internet cafés which are really widespread in the cities of poorer countries, for example? Is an Internet café a single Internet user, or do they count the 100 or 200 regular café users individually? In the first case, the figure means nothing at all, in the second, it's plain wrong from personal experience.

    Also, you never know precisely when they collected their data, which, in telecommunications or computing, does make quite a bit of a difference.

    In general, be as careful with the CIA factbook as with any other source. In spite of the label, it does not only contain accurate facts, and the label "CIA" does not necessarily imply correctness of information.

    1. Re:CIA factbook is a problematic source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, I would agree. the factbook also claims a literacy rate of 97% for adult US citizens, whereas in the last presidential race, candidates agreed that this rate was only at about 80%. Not that this proves anything, but you get the idea...

  223. Propaganda This Is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is sick and disgusting propaganda and I wouldn't doubt Psyops had a part in it. Afghanis need to stop being carpet bombed and starving before they can start raping the planet with the same zeal as the 'civilized' world.

    http://www.antiwar.com

    News that CNN doesn't like to report.

  224. About Commodores... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

    Commodore PCs ran as high as 486-66s.

    Install a bastard Pentium Overdrive, and you have a 100 to 120MHz machine, *maybe*, possibly.

    Bump up the ram to 32mb... and you can install Windows95. You can trivially install Linux.

    You can play mp3s, if barely, on a 486. You can play mpeg1 movies on a Pentium, but it would drop frames and take a bit of space. On the other hand, if they have low res low quality version, maybe it's not a big deal anyway.

  225. Story Validity by thejetman1 · · Score: 1

    The story does have some things correct (ie. about video rentals, music etc.), but does seem to leave some room for wondering about the energy source used for the computer, and the type of computer, and the connection speed to just go and download movies and druel over Apples Web site, and the frequency of e-mails received from the Afghan geek to the Slashdot editor. I think the way everyone on the board could know is if the Afghan geek posted a message on one of his favorite sites (Slashdot), and then we could trace the domain by looking at e-mail information back to Afghanistan. Of course, this isn't to say that this couldn't be replicated, but not without some research.

  226. Rambo3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why independence day? its arealy bad movie!

    show Rambo3!!!

  227. Re:As a separate point against this entire letter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a similar case in western law. When governments enforced gun registration many people buried their guns rather than destroy them. If someone were to outlaw computers I would give them it but backup all my data and bury it somewhere (this is specific to me, neighbours know I use computers a lot and I couldn't just claim I didn't have one).

  228. This article is a crock of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is total bullshit. This story is made up bullshit propaganda from Kuwait. None of those fasting fucking towel heads have a clue about technology.
    Stop posting bullshit about some cock sucking taliban defector missing his timex sinclar computer buried in his mother's grave. There is no fucking way this stone age society has telephone access to the real world.
    NUKE THE FUCKERS and whomever created this article needs to be there in towel head land while the blast is cleasing their land.

    1. Re:This article is a crock of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, we need to stop dehumanizing our killer american niggers.
      It is quite allright for them to be killing rugheads.

      Just because those rugheads are scared of our well oiled black muscle boys, doesn't mean we should feel any sympathy for them.

  229. OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's turning into Al Gore!

  230. Re: I'm not a criminal... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

    I don't know whether to laugh or cry. We're not being liquidated in gas chambers over here, you know.

    Here's my philosophy.

    When I become a criminal (when they define my behavior as criminal or I commit a criminal act), then I will take appropriate measures to defend myself from persecution if wrongfully accused, or I'll accept responsibility if I get caught fair and square. I only trust myself to defend myself, and I'm not just talking about legal representation. If I can't defend myself, I've only got myself to blame and haven't been let down by anyone else's incompetence.

  231. Something MSNBC said... by twistah · · Score: 1

    I remember around the time the Taliban was knockign down statues of Buddha, news came out that they "banned the Internet", and MSNBC (or some other major news outlet) thought this was amusing because no Internet connections exist anywhere exist, unless you're very close to borders with other countries. Come on, Katz. "Gamers and coders hiding PCs"? Yeah, right.

  232. It's kind of exciting.... by gruntvald · · Score: 1

    ... till you think about it for a bit, and then realize it's completely dumb. Who's his ISP? Afghanistan On Line ?How did he know katz current email address? How did he know about /. ? What a comlete crock of absurdity...

  233. Morality is not globally valid by andkaha · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Mankind is my business, and yours too. Enslave someone *anywhere*, and I have the moral right to stop you. Morality does not stop at national borders.

    It's not as simple as that. Do you have the right to e.g. punish someone that thinks he/she is doing the right thing, no matter what organisation, religion or culture that person belongs to?

    You don't have the right to force someone to do (or don't do) something unless that other person "agrees" (has the same cultural, religious or ethnic backround, or lives in the same country and abides to the same laws).

    I think things like for example the U.N. declaration of the human rights are good things, but some other things don't simply have global validity. You take them for granted, like double glased windows, central heating, universities without fees, and taking your shoes off when going indoors (I'm a Swede), but everyone else does not. You can't enforce things like that, not even the U.N. declaration of human rights, on anyone.

    Enforcing a way of life upon someone is wrong. It is a violation of the integrity of the other person. It is denying everything that the other person is.

    I'm not saying it's wrong to stop people hurting each other. I'm saying it's way wrong to call it your moral right to do so, because morality is not global.

    And don't forget: The conflict in Aghanistan exists because of American foreign policy, because of economics, because of oil. Prove me wrong.

    5000 people is a small prise to pay to ensure that ones interests in the middle east are not jeopardised. Don't come talking about moral, because moral is nothing.

    --
    It's 11pm, do you know what your deamons are up to?
    1. Re:Morality is not globally valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And don't forget: The conflict in Aghanistan exists because of American foreign policy, because of economics, because of oil. Prove me wrong.

      You're a flaming asshole who eats marshmallows for supper. Prove me wrong. Silly? Yes, but not as silly as your next statement.

      5000 people is a small prise to pay to ensure that ones interests in the middle east are not jeopardised. Don't come talking about moral, because moral is nothing.

      So you're saying it was okay to kill 5000 people in the world trade center because morals are a relative thing?

      Hey, I hope you get cancer. That's not wrong, because morals are all relative, and I believe that the good of the many makes it imperative that we pray to jesus, buddah, and allah that you get some horrible degenerative disease.

      I realize you're some 16 year old kid with all the sense of a, well, 16 year old kid, but if you really believe this kind of crap, then you're all screwed up.

      People who do good in this world have a really strong moral compasses and understand the difference between right and wrong.

      I say to you "Grow up and join the human race".

    2. Re:Morality is not globally valid by andkaha · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm 28, and you're a troll, but I'm replying nontheless.

      You're a flaming asshole who eats marshmallows for supper.

      No I'm not flaming. I'm pointing out stuff that can and should be viewed in another perspective if one only cares to think for a while. What I was "flaming" about was the fact that the OP (you? I didn't really take note of who wrote it) assumed that he/she had some kind of moral right towards people with a totally different way of thinking.

      I haven't had marshmallows for ages. Too much sugar. And I don't have supper, I have dinner.

      So you're saying it was okay to kill 5000 people in the world trade center because morals are a relative thing?

      Nope, I'm not saying that it's okay to kill 5000 people. I'm saying that the U. S. of A. is using the relatively small number of deaths in the WTC crash (and in terrorist attacks generally) as a means of expanding their economical influence in (and gain from) the middle eastern region. It's all economics. That's how countries work, and it doesn't have anything to do with moral.

      There are other causes of death, some of which are directly sponsored by large industries (guns, tobacco, cars and oil), that are far more common than death by terrorist attack. The sad thing is that these other causes are all "normal" and "acceptable" due to them being part of the American way of life.

      I'm also saying that the people who did the flying and they who did the planning of the WTC crash were "right". They thought they were right in just the same way as most Americans apparantly [we are told] thinks it's correct to bomb the living daylights out of Afghanistan and it's people. They would probably say, just as you are, that they had the "moral right" to do it.

      Hey, I hope you get cancer. That's not wrong, because morals are all relative, and I believe that the good of the many makes it imperative that we pray to jesus, buddah, and allah that you get some horrible degenerative disease.

      Did you say I was flaming? :-) Are you assuming that I am religious in any way? I'm an anarchist, I believe in my right to express myself and to think whatever thoughts I want. I don't believe in being opressed by imaginary entities.

      People who do good in this world have a really strong moral compasses and understand the difference between right and wrong.

      Sorry, but that is totally wrong.

      People that do good doesn't need to know a thing about what's right and what's wrong for anyone. Only you can decide what's right for you.

      I say to you "Grow up and join the human race".

      It's a species, not a race. And I'm already part of it, thank you.

      --
      It's 11pm, do you know what your deamons are up to?
    3. Re:Morality is not globally valid by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      You are both very right.
      Enforcing a way of life upon someone is wrong. It is a violation of the integrity of the other person. It is denying everything that the other person is.
      There is a delicate balance there somewhere, and I am not Solomon.

    4. Re:Morality is not globally valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm 28"

      Come back and post when you get a little older, and have experienced the world.

      "I'm pointing out stuff that can and should be viewed in another perspective if one only cares to think for a while."

      Yes and some analogies are close and on-point and some analagies are absurd. This is clear b/c you can even find people bashing Microsoft on this thread. The commentor was pointing out that your analogies, analysis and conclusions were juvenile. I concur in his opinion.

      "And I don't have supper, I have dinner. "

      dinner - The chief meal of the day, eaten in the evening or at midday.

      supper - A light evening meal when dinner is taken at midday.

      If you want to be witty, you should at least get your facts straight.

      "saying that the U. S. of A. is using the relatively small number of deaths in the WTC crash (and in terrorist attacks generally) as a means of expanding their economical influence in (and gain from) the middle eastern region. It's all economics."

      That argument was worth discussion for a time, but now its time to move past it. Five thousand people died from the direct result of a pre-meditated attack. They have a right to justice. It is not about economics, and even if its was, they still have a right to justice.

      "They thought they were right in just the same way as most Americans apparantly [we are told] thinks it's correct to bomb the living daylights out of Afghanistan and it's people. They would probably say, just as you are, that they had the "moral right" to do it. "

      I don't care what they thought. I don't even care if I am wrong. If someone kills 5,000 of my countrymen, I am going to demand justice.

      "I'm an anarchist [anarchistfaq.org]"

      As I said, come back and post when you have grown up a little. Its real cute to follow a fringe polity when you are a kid and don't have a responsibility to others. Just wait until you have kids to support. Until then, you should listen to your elders rather than fill the need to offer an opinion on every topic.

      "Sorry, but that is totally wrong.

      People that do good doesn't need to know a thing about what's right and what's wrong for anyone. Only you can decide what's right for you."

      Every person that cares to promote such a solipistic view of the world fails to recognize that most legal and moral codes contain very similar tenets. If you truly believe this is the case, don't ever ask anyone for any help.

      "It's a species, not a race. And I'm already part of it, thank you. "

      race1 (rs)
      n.
      A local geographic or global human population distinguished as a more or less distinct group by genetically transmitted physical characteristics.
      A group of people united or classified together on the basis of common history, nationality, or geographic distribution: the German race.
      A genealogical line; a lineage.
      Humans considered as a group.
      Biology.
      An interbreeding, usually geographically isolated population of organisms differing from other populations of the same species in the frequency of hereditary traits. A race that has been given formal taxonomic recognition is known as a subspecies.
      A breed or strain, as of domestic animals.
      A distinguishing or characteristic quality, such as the flavor of a wine.

      As I said previously, if you want to be witty, you should try checking your facts. Otherwise you just look incredibly stupid.

    5. Re:Morality is not globally valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And don't forget: The conflict in Aghanistan exists because of American foreign policy, because of economics, because of oil. Prove me wrong.

      The problems in Afghanistan pre-date widespread use of oil, and pre-date the times that the US even really had a foreign policy. You have to remember that the US played no significant role outside of the New World before the 1890's, and only really took an interest in the Middle East and Central Asia after WWII. Afghanistan has never been a coherent nation, but has always basically been tribal warfare with a set of borders. Their entire economy has been based either upon being near a few trade routes (tolls/taxation) or upon opium. The only difference is that today the tribal warfare is waged with obsolete Soviet rifles instead of with spears and knives.

      5000 people is a small prise to pay to ensure that ones interests in the middle east are not jeopardised. Don't come talking about moral, because moral is nothing.

      Five thousand of MY people is too damn large a price (yes, I am an American, a damn proud one, and I have been for all 30-odd years of my life.) Would 5000 Swedes be a small price, or are you just another bigot?

      And if you have no sense of morals, I don't despise you. I pity you your empty life.

    6. Re:Morality is not globally valid by Wendel+T.+Shaggy · · Score: 1

      The problem is that, as usual, the real situation lies somewhere in between the two extreme views being put forth here.

      Morality can neither be completely relative nor completely fixed. There are morals to which most people would ascibe (rape is bad), there are those on which thinking people can disagree (euthanasia or abortion is bad), and things that most people would agree is not a moral question at all (shoes in the house - actually not that uncommon in Swedish households if you happen to be a guest...) I would posit that slavery is universally bad. I would further posit that the plight of women in Afghanistan consitutes slavery.

      The problem here is that we tend to frame the discussion of the abridgement of women's rights as an issue of "culture" and not one of human rights. What would be unthinkable to support if the distinction were one of race, we tacitly accept if it is a function of gender. Try this on for size - "All blacks may not drive, hold jobs, visit doctors, or appear in public without the presence of white keeper. When in public they may not show their faces, nor any other body part, save the hands. Blacks may not be educated. Failure to follow these rules will result in physical punishment or death." Worse than apartheid, frankly, which received significant world condemnation. Yet, now if we replace black/white with woman/man, it somehow becomes a cultural issue, and not a moral issue on which all can agree. I personally find that very sad.

      The point on the American Cultural/Economic Hegemony (tm) angle is a red herring. Independent of what the US does, it is still our obligation to comment and act upon clear issues of moral right or wrong (as I would say slavery is, whether of blacks or women). We can also have an opinion on whether the actions we or others take in response to moral outrages is appropriate. That is the right forum for discussion the US activities in abroad.

      BTW, you mention that forcing a way of life on someone else is wrong. I agree wholeheartedly - but I include the women as well. If I could truly know that every Afghani woman wanted that life, I would be satisfied. Absent clear evidence, however, I say "Give them the freedom to choose!" If they then choose the life behind the veil, so be it.

    7. Re:Morality is not globally valid by deathscythe257 · · Score: 2
      'Come back and post when you get a little older, and have experienced the world.'
      If you can be 35 and president... 28 is probably a pretty good age to have experienced the world. A majority of people are married and have kids by 28. Your post doesn't make any sense.

      'dinner - The chief meal of the day,'
      The reality is that dinner and supper are used popularly as synonyms. The difference in which one you use comes from your environment... the area you grew up in, your relatives, where you live now, etc. That is this 'young' man's point.

      'its real cute to follow a fringe polity when you are a kid and don't have a responsibility to others.'
      Anarchy is completely about responsibility to others. Without everyones complete support and responsibility to others, anarchy would not work- there is no governing official to put people to jail or death for doing something immoral. And it's not about being 'cute'. When you are young and idealistic you see things you want to change, and in order to do so join radical movements and protest. They may or may not change something, but at least they try. If you were never young and idealistic, there is no way that you would understand this because you probably grew up with right wing ideologies and inherently disagree with leftists. If you were, then you're a sell-out now and you should try and remember how important it was to you back in the day when you went on civil-rights walks or protested the Viet-Nahm war, or worked on campaign finance reform...

      And that definition of race... where did you get it? How many times does a general word have a specific definition.. let's think... i look up race- humans considered as a group is one of the definitions... hmm. Wouldn't that be under Human race??? did you ever look up cartoon and get 'japanese animation as a group'??? no. because that's not the definition.

      But the main argument here is that what is moral to one group is not to another. Look at Texas vs. California... it is moral in texas to use the death penalty, but not in California. It is as simple as that. morality is not a black or white definite answer. and if you never question your own moralities there is something wrong with you.

    8. Re:Morality is not globally valid by andkaha · · Score: 1
      The problems in Afghanistan pre-date widespread use of oil, and pre-date the times that the US even really had a foreign policy.

      You're partly right. Afganistan has had problems for quite some time. But the current U.S. involvment with Aghanistan is due to the U.S. being afraid that the countries around the Persian Gulf will turn againts them and remove their access to the precious oil. The U.S. have been looking for a reason to get rid of the talibans since they took control of Afghanistan, and this crash happened to be the perfect reason to finally do it. The want to get rid of the talibans because they might influence Pakistan and other countries closer to the Gulf, turning them against the U.S.

      But they don't even have to turn counties agains the U.S. It would be bad enough if they managed to somehow unite the "arab countries". One big united arab state would be very bad indeed for the U.S.

      Would 5000 Swedes be a small price, or are you just another bigot?

      At least try to think outside the box.

      Of course you, or anyone, think 5000 of your own kind are 5000 too many, no matter if your kind happens to be Swedes or people from North America. What I'm saying is that to your country (particularly to your country), to the industries and to the system that makes everything go tick tock, 5000 people and some billion bucks are not very much. It's a small price to pay to keep everything ticking.

      And if you have no sense of morals, I don't despise you. I pity you your empty life.

      Thanks for your concern, but I know enough about moral to know moral is something you can't assume you know anything too much about. My life has so far been very interesting indeed.

      --
      It's 11pm, do you know what your deamons are up to?
    9. Re:Morality is not globally valid by Computer! · · Score: 2

      Let me start out by saying that your post is well written, and I liked reading it, even though I disagree with a lot. Your example is powerful, and forces me to say something very unpopular, but accepted deep-down as true by everyone:

      Women and men are different, and have different social and biological capacities

      I know, I know, now I'm a chauvenist. Before you get mad, just look at our society: Women are allowed to wear skirts to work, men are not. Men are allowed to go topless on the street, women are not (except in some parts of California, but I'm pretty sure that there's a part of California that lets you do anything you want). Women get maternity leave, men do not. I'm not making a judgement on who's better, just stating something obvious, which many people seem to forget. In every religon on Earth more than a couple hundred years old, women function in a different capacity than men. Their ability to directly reproduce has allowed them certain priveleges and come with no small consequences. There are some (myself included) that would argue that America's women's movement has done as much harm as good to the status of women, and the place of both men and women in the family. Many think that this recent movement has contributed largely to the breakup of the family unit altogether. As people, our primary function is to form families and raise children. This is true on a much deeper level than the social one. It is a biological necessity for maintaining the species. With all this importance placed on reproduction, is it that suprising that different genders have different roles in society?

      I don't think it would be a lot of fun to have to wear restrictive clothing, sure. On the other hand, it's probably not all that great when your mom is only 13 years older than you, and you don't know who your dad is. The Afghans are merely observing a millenia-old cultural distinction that seems extreme to us because we have the WNBA.

      it is still our obligation to comment and act upon clear issues of moral right or wrong (as I would say slavery is, whether of blacks or women).

      See, you kill yourself in the parentheses. I agree that owning another person is wrong. I do not believe that being devoted to your spouse is wrong. Who wins? You, because you have a jet bomber and read left-to-right? Bullshit. I say neither of us win, and the Afghanis figure it out for themselves.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    10. Re:Morality is not globally valid by andkaha · · Score: 2
      Come back and post when you get a little older, and have experienced the world.

      Now, this is getting personal, and I'm truly sorry about that. I just want to say that at age 28, I believe that I have had quite a lot of experience of the world. I am now, for example, as far from my birth place as I can possibly get without leaving the ground.

      I don't care what they thought. I don't even care if I am wrong. If someone kills 5,000 of my countrymen, I am going to demand justice.

      Sure you will. And the U.S. is going to sentence a lot of people, innocent and guilty, to death and to prison, because of public opinion. And other people, both guilty and innocent will go free, but have their lifes severly crippled by the restrictions that the U.S. will put on what they can do, what they may say and where they may go, because of public opinion.

      Public opinion is what the media delivers. It's the same in all countries. The interesting bits are those that fails to reach the TV screen.

      Have you ever wondered why it's so important to show crying mothers, dead babies, broken families and brave firefighters on TV? It's important so that you, the person watching the TV, thinks it's right to act against "the ones that did it". It's important to keep the citizens on the correct line of thought so that they don't stop their government from doing the morally correct thing.

      Of course you want justice. After all, you are a good citizen.

      --
      It's 11pm, do you know what your deamons are up to?
    11. Re:Morality is not globally valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, and this it a bit ironic, CNN tells us that there has only been 673 confirmed deaths in the WTC attack, and about 3275 missing.

      Those numbers are getting terribly low. Maybe so low they're not even usable as an excuse for attacking Afghanistan?

      What if 2000 of those "missing" people turns out to be alive or if they only can confirm 500 more deaths?

  234. What should be required to back up a story? by StaticLimit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I certainly wouldn't mind seeing some evidence, but I do think that in general, the Katz series of articles tend to be designed more towards provoking debate and seeding ideas than toward investigative reporting. It's a piece about the power of technology, not a master's thesis on broadband in Kabul with footnotes. I may be too trusting, but I don't think that Jon presents an entirely implausable scenario. How could this be proven if it were in fact true? Would email message headers do it? I doubt it.

    The way I see it, sufficient proof would be full email headers, substantiating email from each member of the forwarding chain, photos of the much ballyhoo'd Commodore (preferably playing a downloaded copy of The Phantom Edit), and ISP records proving that movies could be (and had been) downloaded on the outskirts of Kabul. Or alternatively, I guess a video interview with the dude in Afganistan might suffice, though it's not like Jon can just hop on a flight to Kabul (unless he enlists in the special forces ;).

    Frankly, that's a pretty heavy burden of evidence to place on any journalist and especially here on Slash-(We'll post obvious product advertising literature sent from company email addresses)-dot. I'd be curious what sort of evidentiary standard reporters are generally held to at upstanding newspapers and magazines.

    Screw on-topic! Let's start a thread...
    What is reasonably required to back up a journalist's story? And especially here on Slashdot (Katz, Taco, rest-of-crew feel free to chime in [unlikely]... or mod down [more likely])

    - StaticLimit

    1. Re:What should be required to back up a story? by alienmole · · Score: 2
      Frankly, that's a pretty heavy burden of evidence to place on any journalist and especially here on Slash-(We'll post obvious product advertising literature sent from company email addresses)-dot.

      You're confusing issues here. Katz is claiming something factual, which I'm questioning based on apparent contradictions in allegedly factual statements he made. The posting of links to undigested press releases on /. is not making a false claim about facts, especially if the editor simply quotes and attributes a submission. If Katz had actually quoted some or all of the email in question, that would have gone a long way towards at least allowing some determination of its likely authenticity. Basically, as it stands, we have to trust Katz to have correctly assessed whether or not this was a hoax. Having read some of Katz's writings, I don't have sufficient faith in his critical thinking abilities to trust his assessment, given the limited solid information he provided.

      I'd be curious what sort of evidentiary standard reporters are generally held to at upstanding newspapers and magazines.

      Perhaps the fact that you're not familiar with this sort of thing is why we're having this discussion. Upstanding news sources have professional fact-checkers and editors on staff, who are alert for basic issues like the ones we're discussing here - suspicious and contradictory facts based on a tenuous source - and much more - things like etiquette, proper attribution, corroborating evidence, consistency, etc. Real journalists certainly have to deal with hoaxes, and that's one of the things that fact-checkers deal with.

      Of course, it goes without saying that /. has no such formal process, beyond the individual efforts of the editors who post stories. Katz in particular suffers badly from not having an editor or fact-checker going over his work, and he really isn't good enough to go it alone. In fact, the only piece I ever read by Katz which I thought was well done was in Brill's Content, a (now-defunct?) print magazine, in which I am almost certain Katz was edited, possibly quite heavily. Either that, or he had to stick to a length constraint, and the discipline must have been good for him.

  235. Ya know by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

    It's things like this - "No computers on pain of death" that make the US seem slightly better. It's also things like this that make the Taliban even worse.

  236. The Afghani i got an email from missed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PBS's The Capital Gang most for its in depth thought provoking rehashing by a bunch of old line media lamers.

  237. Internet in Afghanistan by JSR+$FDED · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I won't comment on the nature of the email itself, which is obviously a hoax (and a bad one at that), but I am in contact with a friend who's been in Peshawar for a little over six months now, so I thought I could shed some light on some of the questions that the thread generated. She's been sending me regular reports (about once a month) about her life there, and of course, the topic has greatly changed since 9/11.

    She was evacuated to Pakistan for a few weeks and she's now back in Peshawar, where she works for an ONG.

    The Internet exists in Afghanistan, and the Talibans could never eradicate it completely. There are a limited number of Internet cafes in University Town (very deserted right now but this will change when Torkham opens again). The sessions are very cheap (about 20 roupies) and the bandwidth is of course very limited, but they seem to offer the minimal needed to send emails.

    A lot of the Internet cafes have booths and are mostly used for porn, as are some of the few movie theaters left open. In those, the beginning of the movie is usually Taliban-related and it switches after a few minutes to the juicy stuff.

    That's it for now, I can elaborate if there's interest.

  238. It's possible..... by JumpyMonkey · · Score: 1

    http://msnbc.com/news/660540.asp

  239. Bunk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American culture is what this world is yearning for. Let's give em divorce, traffic jams, and smog. If the Taliban couldn't finish the population off, our culture sure will.

  240. Broadband in Kabul? by spike+hay · · Score: 1

    Jeez, this guy was downloading MP3's and movies with his broadband connection in Kabul a few years ago? I only got my broadband a few months ago. What a gyp!

    --
    If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  241. Propaganda by Minix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So the `story' is `metaphoric' or `symbolic', is it? No, it's not. It's bullshit. It's been professionally prepared to influence your opinions, feelings and reactions, and its intended effect is to pacify you while you're being repressed in your own country, it is only peripherally about Afghanistan.

    Firstly, I would just like to congratulate the author: this story is the most transparent example of propaganda I've been privileged to see.
    Something over a million people are at risk of starvation in Afghanistan because of the US' air invasion but little Timmy has never had it so good because of the magic of western technology and baywatch?

    The intent of whoever writes propaganda is to appeal to our prejudices (technology good, food is something you get out of the fridge.) In this case, we are distracted from any issues that we might conceivably do something about. Its overt project here is to pacify the readers.

    In that first aim, it has largely failed: good propaganda hooks straight into deeply held beliefs and anxieties, and bypasses the critical faculties, it seeks a direct emotional effect, which in this case (due to the overdeveloped critical faculties of computer weenies) it has not directly achieved.

    Look at the subtext, though, look at what's not being said directly, think of it as a fable, or a just-so story: ``Technology thrives even through the most repressive regime. Little Timmy kept the spirit of innovation and connectedness alive even through 5 years of political and social repression.''

    Consider, for a moment, that you geeks in the US, and probably we geeks on the periphery, are witnessing exactly the kind of erosion of civil liberties that the Taliban would approve of, and in the same cause (godless heathens at the gates, pull the wagons in a circle, accept arbitrary rule to preserve your culture.)

    Consider the buried message in this piece of propaganda: If little Timmy could survive the Taliban by burying his C64 in chickenshit, then surely *I* can survive the radical restrictions of a US at `war', the GW Putsch, the suppression of free speech, by just keeping my head down - burying my processing power under the warm pile of steaming chickenshit which is JKatz's story.

    Hell, I can even download porn and videos under martial law. Good deal! Where do I sign?

    --
    "There are four boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order." Ed Howdershelt
  242. Get your facts right Katz. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get your facts right Katz. Poland did not have a cultural repressive Government that can be compared to the Taliban. It was repressive in the way that it tried to eliminate any political opposition, but in never denied people's rights to learn English, listen to ABBA, and watch Donald Duck or anything else that was pumped out through the pop culture machine. The things that were censored were NOT really pop culture in the West anyway. Actually, the government at the time was considered more lenient when compared to other satellite states.

  243. another example by kpeerless · · Score: 1

    of Katz's rich fantasy life. However... when you're dreaming these gems up for us Katz, try to make it a little believable.

    ergo... the Taliban was barely out of town when the dude and his friends were out in the chicken house digging up the floorboards...

    Spare me. Most of the goddam HOUSES in Afghanistan don't have boards on the floor for chrissake.

    Check out CNN agsin Katz... DESERT! ROCK! NO TREES! Sheesh! Geeks!

  244. Could be Fidonet?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He could have been running Fidonet. He could use it for e-mail/usenet, and it will run on a Commodore C-64. If he had fidonet, he can phone across the border to Pakistan and exchange mail. Of course his mail could easily be bounced around a lot before it gets to its destination, which seems to be the case.

    1. Re:Could be Fidonet?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would he write an email talking about American pop culture. He seems to supposedly had contact with info on what is going on in the Western world. He would have wrote talking about what was going on in Afghanistan with the bombings and such. It makes no sense he would write an email talking about technology and Survivor of all things.

  245. We're All Brothers and Sisters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "He's already made his way to some sex sites, and wishes he had a printer."

    Damn be careful buddy, where ya gonna get a new keybord round there?

  246. In additional amusing news by NeuroManson · · Score: 3, Funny

    It turns out that the "plans" for nuclear (read 'Nukular' in Bushspeek) weapons they discovered in Taliban hideouts may have been based on a scientific parody magazine (and subsequently distributed via the internet):

    http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0147/ridgeway 2. php

    WASHINGTON, D.C.-Suddenly, Al Qaeda doesn't look so smart. Just
    yesterday, a Times of London reporter found a cache of plans, left in
    a Kabul home as the Taliban retreated, that included notes for making
    a thermonuclear device. The papers sent a chill through the Western
    world, since they appeared to indicate sophisticated designs for an
    atom bomb.

    Now the online Daily Rotten says at least part of those documents
    photographed by the Times are taken verbatim from a "semi-famous"
    pseudo-document that has been circulating on the Internet for years.
    It's a reprint of a scientific parody called "How to Build an Atom
    Bomb," from the geek-humor newsletter Annals of Improbable Research,
    originally known as the Journal of Irreproducible Results.

    In his report for the BBC, reporter Anthony Loyd held some of the
    papers up for the camera, giving a glimpse of documents the Daily
    Rotten now compares to the 1979 parody.

    Even the language Loyd uses to paraphrase the abandoned material
    sounds like that of the satirical document.

    Describing the scene in a Times article, Loyd wrote: "The vernacular
    quickly spun out of my comprehension but there were phrases through
    the mass of chemical symbols and physics jargon that anyone could
    understand, including notes on how the detonation of TNT compresses
    plutonium into a critical mass producing a nuclear chain reaction and
    eventually a thermo-nuclear reaction . . . ."

    The parody document reads: "The device basically works when the
    detonated TNT compresses the Plutonium into a critical mass. The
    critical mass then produces a nuclear chain reaction similar to the
    domino chain reaction . . . .The chain reaction then promptly produces
    a big thermonuclear reaction. And there you have it, a 10 megaton
    explosion!"

    To find these faux atomic-bomb plans, do a Web search for "The device
    basically works" or "Let's Build an Atomic Bomb!" instructs the Daily
    Rotten. "It gives us pause and joy to know the Taliban are wasting
    their time downloading what amounts to joke mail and spending time
    trying to discern the facts therein."

    Homeland security secretary Tom Ridge acknowledged the plans had been
    found, but downplayed their importance. With this Daily Rotten report,
    the public may get a glimpse of why.

    Reached at the Pentagon spokesperson Major Tim Blair said, "I can't
    comment on that. You can find all kinds of reports, and you have to
    look at which ones are credible. We issue briefings and press
    releases, but we don't talk about anything dealing with intelligence.
    I'm not throwing stones, but the media should check the credibility of
    their sources. You all have to do your job."

    The foreign editor who handled the story for the Times was not
    immediately available for comment.

    --

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  247. Let's see what other inconsistencies we can find.. by Leeji · · Score: 1

    Well, I think there's a few more inconsistencies we might not have realized in this story:

    1. Slashdot was founded in 1997. The Taliban seized control of Afghanistan in 1996. I know that Slashdot is cool, but do you think that it spread by word of mouth to Afghanistan?
    2. Linux was ported to Commodore in 1998. Was this guy infatuated in Linux without ever installing or seeing it?
    3. The state of Texas initated the Microsoft antitrust debacle in 1997. Even if that (and details of it) spread by word of mouth, do you think this guy would have had time to form a rational opinion? ("I thought they were going to get Microsoft.")

    As a side note, I feel sorry for anyone using any of the search engines that they remember from 1996.

    --
    It all goes downhill from first post ...
  248. I Think I Know Why by Popocatepetl · · Score: 1

    This article is bizarre. Unfortunately, some people may actually believe it. I don't believe it myself.

    CNN.com has been posting stories about how the US Government wants to influence media companies to send these types of messages to us. I wonder if that is what is happening here. This is just so weird.

  249. BinLaden and Crypto by Bruj0 · · Score: 1

    (news reports have frequently mentioned that Bin-Laden's organization used both e-mail and encrypted files to communicate).

    I hope this is not a comment in favor of regulation of Cripto but it sure sounds like one.
    Anyways my opinion on this "report" is that is totally FUD.

    --
    http://securityportal.com.ar
    1. Re:BinLaden and Crypto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you tell us what FUD means?

    2. Re:BinLaden and Crypto by Bruj0 · · Score: 1

      http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Hills/9267/ fuddef.html
      First link in google when searching for "FUD".Basicly "FUD stands for Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt".

      --
      http://securityportal.com.ar
  250. That's a global moral statement... by Gorimek · · Score: 2

    Do you realize that you're contradicting yourself? You're telling other people that it's wrong to tell other people what to do. Funny funny!

    According to your own statement, as a Swede you have no right to tell Americans not to interfere in Afghani relations.

    Many other arguments could be made againt your position, but it's disproved itself already, so I'll spare you the details.

    1. Re:That's a global moral statement... by andkaha · · Score: 2
      Do you realize that you're contradicting yourself? You're telling other people that it's wrong to tell other people what to do. Funny funny!

      Nope, I believe I attacked the idea of there being some kind of moral right. I'm not telling anyone what they should do, but I'm telling them what I think. It's part of what people like to call freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is a funny thing, I agree.

      Now, I'm not forcing my views upon you, because that would be contradicting myself (apart from being incredibly stupid). I'm saying that I believe that it's wrong to force ones views upon anyone else. If you feel forced to believe that, then I'm truly sorry.

      According to your own statement, as a Swede you have no right to tell Americans not to interfere in Afghani relations.

      Interfere in Afgani relations? You can't have a relation with less than one entity. You mean internal relations? I have no right to stop Americans from doing anything. I have no right to say I have a right to stop anyone from doing anything. I do have the right to say I want them to stop doing whatever thay are doing, but no right to even insinuate that I have any kind of right to actually stop them from e.g. bombing Afghanistan. I can't require them to do or not do things.

      There's a difference.

      Many other arguments could be made againt your position, but it's disproved itself already, so I'll spare you the details.

      This is not a private conversation. Other people might be interested in your arguments...

      --
      It's 11pm, do you know what your deamons are up to?
    2. Re:That's a global moral statement... by swoopx · · Score: 1

      As the orignal poster said, "mankind is my business".

      I think it is as simple as that. Did we have no right to stop nazi germany from killing millions of jews? Did we have no right to interfer with their society? They believed the jews were animals just like the Taliban view their women. Should we have left well enough alone and say we had no right to put "our" morals on them? Lucky for the women in Afghanistan that they are needed to produce childeren. There are basic unquestionable morals in this world. And they dont stop at some imaginary line on a map.


      "And don't forget: The conflict in Aghanistan exists because of American foreign policy, because of economics, because of oil. Prove me wrong. "

      Pardon? We are in this for the money? Those 5000 people that died is just some opportunity for us? Do you realize how much money we are spending everyday being over there? All those bombs we're dropping? And you know what we will get out of it? Oil? Nope. Nothing. Execpt for a debunk oppressive regime and dead Al Qaeda members. If you could show me some evidence, I'd be happy to look at it, but your conspiracy theories are best kept to yourself.

    3. Re:That's a global moral statement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Godwin's law you lost this arguement.

      I am surprised you Americans know so little of history. You could have used the Young Turks as an example. Oh wait... Everything the Young Turks have done is slid under the rug with the help of your government.

    4. Re:That's a global moral statement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They found oil in Kazakhastan you trollop. The Kazakhs do not want it routed through Russia as the Russians will steal some oil if it is piped in through their land. The US governmnet wants it piped through, guess where? Afghanistan. They found alot of oil too. It is a much larger oil deposit than any other country has.

    5. Re:That's a global moral statement... by andkaha · · Score: 1
      Did we have no right to stop nazi germany from killing millions of jews?

      Ask any nazi and they'll tell you that you had no right whatsoever and that they, the old nazis, were right. What makes you think you are truly right? Can't you stand it when other people hold an opposing view?

      Pardon? We are in this for the money? Those 5000 people that died is just some opportunity for us? Do you realize how much money we are spending everyday being over there?

      When did you last read your country's foreign policy for the middle east? 10% of the oil consumption in the U.S. comes from the Persian Gulf, and the U.S. spends between $30 and $60 billion each year on their military presence to ensure that that oil keeps flowing the right way. See e.g. http://www.igc.org/infocus/. The bombs that the US is dropping are cheap in comparison.

      --
      It's 11pm, do you know what your deamons are up to?
    6. Re:That's a global moral statement... by Gorimek · · Score: 2

      You said "morality is not globally valid" and "moral is nothing".

      Then you say "You don't have the right to force someone to do (or don't do) something unless that other person "agrees" (has the same cultural, religious or ethnic backround, or lives in the same country and abides to the same laws). "

      This second statement tells us what actions are right and wrong. It is clearly a moral statement, and a global one too. That is the contradiction I was pointing out.

  251. Articles like these... by ttys00 · · Score: 1

    ...must be the reason people exclude Jon Katz in their viewing preferences. What a bunch of shit.

    I'm off to tick that little box myself now. I bet its getting a lot of hits today.

  252. I have to say ... by Naum · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... this is a ridiculous concoction. Digging up a computer after it's been buried 4-5 years? Um, even leaving a computer in a hot trunk all weekend can cause it to fry ... 4-5 years of climate changes, dirt, moisture ???? Watching video on a Commodore computer? Correct me if I'm wrong, but an "ancient" Commodore is not even as powerful as a gameboy or an old HP scientific calculator. And internet access - from a string tied between two empty bean tin cans?

    Katz, either you are (A) purposely perpetrating a propaganda fraud or (B) so fucking clueless that you would buy into a hoax email and trot it out as a feature story or (C) got your dates confused and thought it was April 1 today but that would be a sick joke ...

    That does it ... as soon as I post this, I'm going to set my /. preferences to filter out all "stories" by Katz. If I want Cinderella tales or bedtime stories, I'll go see the new Harry Potter movie ...

    --

    AZspot
    1. Re:I have to say ... by op00to · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bah, he was probably talking about an Amiga, made by Commodore. They kicked ass. I have one that has been sitting in a damp basement for 5 years -- much worse than buried in a chicken coop. It booted up first try...

  253. I think you mean the Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Taliban never made a dent in the attachment this Afghan programmer and his friends had for it.


    Jon, I think you mean the Americans never made a dent. It was they who bombed the fuck out of Afghanistan.

  254. inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what's really inevitable?

    John Katz pathetically preaching to slashtrash.

    John Katz sounding like an idiot, even amongst the endless supply of idiots on this web site.

    Sure, mod me troll. It's still true, and you can't change that, moderator or not.

    1. Re:inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This site is full of idiots. How can so many people believe this shit.

  255. He didn't 'download movies' by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    It just said he was 'trying to download movies'

    I can try all day to drive 100mph in my Daihatzu handivan, but it doesn't mean I can.

  256. Try the SBS World Guide by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    The SBS World Guide is pretty good.

    It's a service of the Australian SBS broadcasting network, a multi-ethnic/cultural/language & world news network. Its owned by the Australian govt & is a sister network to the ABC, Australia's equilivent to the BBC.

  257. Got the answer, never mind! by Da+Masta · · Score: 1

    Don't bother replying to my question. I only now noticed the article was written by Jon Katz.

  258. Forwarded by Nate237 · · Score: 1

    Did anyone notice that he mentions that he received a "forwarded" email?

  259. Re:Hmmm. Amigas could easily play video by memyselfandmyhand · · Score: 0

    Most people seem to forget that Amigas were a good 5 years ahead of pc's. The Amiga 4000 had a "Motorola (R) 68040 series 32-bit processor", running at 25mhz. Dont let the low number fool you. Those RISC chips had a lot of grunt. (The playstation one had a similar cpu running at only 33mhz). Add to this the fact that Amigas have a dedicated graphics processor, and a dedicated sound processor, and you've got quite a powerfull machine for its age. It could EASILY handle mpeg1 fullscreen.. (even a 486sx can handle mpeg1). hell, I know someone who does realtime video editing on an amiga.

    References
    http://amiga.emugaming.com/a4000tech.html - A4000 statistics
    http://www.sony-middleeast.com/playstation/psone.h tm - PSone statistics.

  260. U.S. in Kabul by XO · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd be willing to bet that the U.S. forces in Kabul have seriously increased the amount of Internet Accessibility in the general area - I KNOW for a FACT, that there had been relatively widespread internet access in *.AF in the time of the gulf war, as I had several contacts in that area, during that point in time.

    It's likely that the U.S. forces have restored access to the area in a relatively short period of time - even the military boys like the Internet.

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  261. Excellent Analysis of the Real Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Mr. Katz,

    I rarely post to Slashdot, but after reading your latest piece, I felt the necessity to send this letter. This is by far the most insightful study of the Afghan conflict that I have read. The first real human interest story to emerge from the country of Afghanistan since the conflict.
    In reading your previous articles, I thought your politics were too liberal for me. I did not understand how anyone could condone the action of murderers of children (i.e. Columbine). Now, I see that you are a true patriot. You understand the struggle, and how America truly is trying to bring freedom to the opressed of the world.
    Young Junis should have the right to experience the same freedoms that are available to American kids. If he wants to hack on his Commodore, he should be able to provided that he does not break the law.
    I truly hope that you use your gifts as a writer and journalist to bring us more such pieces. Please ferret out of your network more such interesting stories. I would be interested in seeing how the Afghan quality of life has improved since we liberated them from such an oppressive ruling faction.
    I'd like to know how our superior value system has broken the red circle in socialist countries like China and their European counterparts like Finland and Sweden.
    Its common that people who hate our love of liberty will attack you. You must be strong. The red army cannot withstand such objective evidence such as a testimonial on the superiority of our culture.
    Most journalists ignore this concept. You rarely find coverage of these issues except on talk radio. Thank you for bringing sanity to the internet.

  262. that's it for me by psych031337 · · Score: 2

    Well... the subject line says it all.

    I am always more than willing to listen to opposing opinions (even if there are really far off mine).

    But this time Katz has gone a tad bit too far. I'll exclude his stories in my /. setup.

    Using the current dramatic situation for cheap careering moves is just too far off my moralic imprint...

    --
    +++ath0
  263. Viet Nasm Part II `SPQR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    But what happens when someone builds a voice recognition AI that makes it cheap
    enough to spy on EVERYBODY? Will you still feel safe that the government
    doesn't care enough about you to spy on you?

    These bullsh't mouthahs wouldn't know what to listen for ..."could you do me
    a favor?" ..."t'sup"..."momajoma gonna take the big ones... "Jesus sez"..."none are so
    blind as those who will not see" ...especially if they are in sugar shock from too
    many jelly donuts.

    Hi technology huh? If I am elected President I will arrest
    Bill Gates for treason, destroying millions of American man hours & prolifferating
    backdoors & other sabotoge against the computing public. I will enforce the WWII
    laws against broadcasting encrypted communications against HBO

    American Technology huh? While everyone in Washinton are geting their
    rocks off ...green Berets on their asses, how about a couple of mine dogs with 'cams on
    collars' going in [trained to smell out bullsh't].

    The faggots in Washington are going to blow the American rep around the World,
    the cheap bitches! Here the N Alliance walks all the way down to Kabel in bare feet
    to take the city & what do we give them, nada.

    You don't want them in the city throw a party at the airport. Open a PX for our
    friends so when a black market springs up [it will], we can control it.
    When a GI showed up in a town in WWII, he had cigaretes,gum chocolate,
    silk stockings. Now in Afganistan a GI shows up

    they're lucky if he's not gay & trying to screw their kids, he don't smoke,
    chocolate rots his teeth ,let the kids buy their own gum, & he can't be bothered
    to have anything nice to trade. with the girls.

    Technology, these buttheads lack basic social skills. Bring something with you
    when you visit.

    P>Dear War Department seeing three soldiers standing in the midst of
    friendly civilians; with weapons at port arms is ridiculous,I am ashamed. & that
    dumb pack on their backs, dear Jesus, what is a helicopter crewman going to do
    with a backpack. We are going into another damn Viet Nam, a bunch of jerks
    pulling us into a phoney situation where our guys are geting killed for no damned
    reason.

    Free Mason bastards screwing our war efforts.I would like to know how
    come a world wide international secret society with a dossier on all of us
    doesn't know who killed Kennedy or who's putting Anthrax in our mail? They
    certainly got our positions to the North Koreans fast enough.

    Yo Dubya, you promised us the weapons to win this war.We need Napalm;
    Daisy cutters make their point nicely but napalm will make a cave entrance too
    hot for days, Cobra gunships; a silent presence that will make surprise atacks
    foolhardy, seismic detectors; to pick up arms smuggling, like on the Mexican
    border , industrial lasers to harrass aggressor forces while not killing civilian
    hostages[remember the hostage of today is tomorrow's consumer]. security
    cameras, mounted on totally inaccessile mountain ridges, to survail for road hits,
    bandits,etc;Harleys, snowmobiles,powergliders,dunebuggies, to impress the natives,
    & overcome terrain obstacles, service, ,repair teams etc.You might not believe this
    but secret locations that a guy wouldn't reveal for 25000000 bucks might
    pass between friends on a couple of bikes.

  264. Re:Wil Wheaton Dead At Age 29 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just a case of an overanxious radio station reporting innuendo without checking facts.

    The real story was that Wil Wheaton's career is dead. The actor is alive, well, and unemployed.

  265. Forcing vs Enforcing by MikeLRoy · · Score: 1

    One of the hallmarks of International Development is the impact that western "aid" has on "undeveloped" communities. The effect of introducing new crops, for example, might mean people spend less time farming, thus needing other work to do, etc. The impact can be huge.

    However, i digress. You were talking about imposing the UN decleration of human rights on Afghanistan (citing cultural examples of Amish and Orthodox Jews). That said, here is the difference: an Amish or Orthodox Jewish Woman in the US or Canada or Sweden (or Israel or any democratic free country) can choose wether or not to observe their religion. IE, the state does not force anything upon them, they have a choice of weather to dress modestly, pray seperately from men, etc. In afghanistan, the women had no such choice. If a woman there sees fit to wear a burqa and not learn and stay in the house, thats her choice. However, any woman who does not want to should be able to choose not to. THATS THE UN DECLARATION. We aren't forcing anything but the freedom to choose on opposed people.

    -Michael Roy

    --
    -Michael Roy Some people are like Slinkies. Not really useful, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down
    1. Re:Forcing vs Enforcing by Computer! · · Score: 2

      First off, here's the UN declaration of Human Rights, for anybody that's interested.

      That said, here is the difference: an Amish or Orthodox Jewish Woman in the US or Canada or Sweden (or Israel or any democratic free country) can choose wether or not to observe their religion.

      OK, but what about China or Saudi Arabia, or rural India, or Indonesia, or on and on and fucking on. The above document is bullshit. For instance:

      All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.

      Not if you live in a monarchy, like about 1/8 of the world's population! Even Denmark has a king (uh...I think...), which renders that statement retarded.

      However, any woman who does not want to should be able to choose not to.

      Just like I should be able to choose whether to allow my balls to swing freely from the zipper of my jeans. Unfortunately (fortunately for everyone else), that would violate (this part is important) the local standards for decency. Exchange "balls" for "anything", "jeans" for "burqa", and "I" for "women of most mid-east countries", and you'll see what I'm saying.

      We aren't forcing anything but the freedom to choose on opposed people.

      I'll assume you mean "oppressed" here. My point is that you can't even force choice on anyone. Some peoples (intentional plural) have decided that they would rather go to heaven than wear shorts, or even allow their wives to wear shorts. That is their business. For the most part, even Muslim women feel the same way. Islam was not born on the backs of an army, but born in the words of someone considered to be a prophet from God.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
  266. Fuck off Katz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are the biggest fucking moron Katz... are you dumb enough to believe this shit?

    This guy's got holes in his story you could drive a fucking mack truck through.

    You can just go fuck Taco up the ass... hang on.. Taco is too good for a prick like you.

    FUCK OFF!

    This message is brought to you by the Tampax Tampon once shoved up Taco's ass.

    Merry Fucking Christmas

  267. MOD THIS UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy speaks the truth!

    Fucking genius!

  268. Independence Day by jb_nizet · · Score: 1

    This weekend, a movie theater and video store opened up again in Kabul (renting Independence Day)

    Independence Day! Rhaaaa! Please Taliban, come back ;-)

  269. Worst. Post. Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the biggest heap of CRAP I've EVER read on slashdot!

    *ugh*

  270. If it is a hoax by berchca · · Score: 1

    Remember it works because we all want to believe the best. I think it's rather encouraging in America that while we've been attacked, we still search for the best in human nature.

  271. Journalistic Integrity by Afty0r · · Score: 1

    FOr all those who are whinging about the possibility of a hoax, and of Katz' integrity, let us not forget the very first sentence of this article :

    "An open information society is inevitable."

    A plain and simple statement, predicting the future. This clearly marks Katz' bias from the word go, I really would like to see journalism I read showing integrity and objectivity, not sensationalism and techno-freedom-evangelism.

    Slashdot Human Resources staffers take note.

    1. Re:Journalistic Integrity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Taco could share his technique of ODing on imodium, then shoving a tampon up his ass to keep the shit in.

      Oh.. hang on.. Katz is already full of shit.. never mind.

  272. Re:Uhhhhh... - Independence Day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even given the potential for rapid piracy everywhere on earth, I fail to see how a video rental store could spring up overnight; you'd need to have trucked in a lot of blank tape, and spent a lot of time dubbing, at least.

    ...and if the US brought in such things as some sort of goodwill effort- Independence Day? Where the aliens nearly succeed in invading and destroying the planet? Er, okay, whatever.

    Hell, maybe it's true- let's see the original mail, or better, some photos from those webcams we dropped along with the videos...

  273. mod up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats some sick shit there, mister

  274. You really don't get it do you? by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    Ever seen a frog dropped into boiling water? He jumps right out! Now drop him in cold water and turn on th eheat - he'll happily sit there till he's par boiled and DEAD. The frog is yu with your head in the sand.

    Do you even have any idea what behaviour is considered illegal? You may think you do but you may be VERY surprised one day. In states like Virginia they're passing laws that give strength to those damned shrinkwrap licenses. Since you're not a criminal and don't intend ever to be one I'm sure you read those right? How about the DMCA - have you ever READ that piece of legislation? Did you know it contains a provision specifically to protect the design of boat hulls? Yup, "Huh?!" is exactly what I said when this was pointed out to me. The DMCA session at DEFCON was most interesting, a more F*CKED law I've never seen - it contradicts itself in several places and even redefines "fair use".

    How about the new "Anti-Terrorism" bills that have been passed recently. Any ideas what they have to say? Sure you've never broken any of the laws you don't know about? How come John Ashcroft has ignored SIX letters by a congressional subcomitee inquiring about these "new powers" to testify? We've had more than one THOUSAND people locked up since 9/11 who haven't been charged - seems you might not actually HAVE to break a law to be held. But hey, you'll never raise suspicion right? No chance you might not piss off someone at random who might be able to give you attention you don't deserve right? I could even be as simple as cutting off the wrong person in traffic if the abuse gets too bad.

    Tell you what, you're obviously a good responsible citizen who votes and as a Slashdot reader you probably don't much like the DMCA. Why don't you go find out if your representative voted for that law so you'll know what to do come next election. What's that? It was passed on a voice vote* and you can't find out who voted for it? Gee, I guess things aren't quite as bright and cheery in your world as you thought huh?

    *FWIW, I've been told that the DMCA was and was NOT voice voted depending upon who I've spoken to about it - it could be FUD. I have no doubt though that getting a rep to explain clearly their position on this piece of garbage to a constituant would be difficult. Som of the tacked on provisions to that law are a joke! The boat hull thing is a good example of this.

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    1. Re:You really don't get it do you? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      I don't argue that it's that bad.

      My position is that I'm not willing to do anything about it in the arena that it must be address (the legal system), so I'm not going to bitch about it.

      By the same token, all this braying and whining just makes you look like a paranoid ass if you're not somewhere DOING something about it.

  275. Fact or Fiction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He hid a commodore. "How can he hook up to the net and play video and blah blah blah!"

    Most people who had 'em hid cd players and such as well.

    CD > Commodore.

    It stands to reason that.. *gasp* Yes! They have more than Commodores over there!

    Ever think that he's upgraded? I mean, a government just got toppled.. Free loot!

    He may have just hid the Commodore because that's what he used back in the day. I'd love to still have my Commodore in working order.. :P

    Anyway, good story, Katz. Can't believe I'm saying that. :) Maybe you can clear up some of the 'fuzzier' points for people though.

  276. This is fake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the hell could someone get on the internet there? They all live in caves for one! Come on, this has to be a fake.

  277. You moderators SUCK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We know we're being off topic making a comment about a post some of us think is funny, or almost funny, but do you really have to moderate EVERY GODDAMN POST AS -1 ???

    Just leave it our Anoncowards at 0 and try to find something insightful new post to moderate up... I saw a couple you fuckers missed...

    I usually meta-moderate against fuckers like you, and I suggest everybody else should who likes to relax a little...

  278. WHY IS THIS FLAMEBAIT??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See me other post...

    For those 3rd parties ACTUALLY reading this. This is how NOT to moderate. Anonymous Coward's comments aren't seen anyway, so just find insightful fucking comments that never get modded up rather than waisting your moderation points on stupid comments that are already rated low enough...

    PS, Flamebait is a comment that does nothing but anger people, causing people to flame (angry/intense responses), thus waisting people's time.

  279. western assumptions to the fore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wrong idea of afghanistan. sure is very poor now materially. but was not always the case. there were several highly educated persons in cities, also dont be under (misunderestimated)impression about how people tackle repression and restrictions. there are now several cybercafes. why do you assume the guy is a turbaned bearded village idiot with a gun. (afghan redneck).
    ...and another thing...whats the price of the drug in the usa. some of them have lots of money, just dont flaunt it. katz may be right for all you know. ask some afghan students and check.

  280. the problem with that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the assholes moderating everything as offtopic.

  281. Re:Jon Katz Docking Procedure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly do you sell worldwide, Mr. Sales?

  282. I think it's a hoax, too, but by scribblej · · Score: 1
    I think this is a hoax, too. But you people need to check up on your facts. I've seen lots of you saying "A commodore couldn't play movies!!" C'mon, people... Commodore is a BRAND name, not a specific PC. The Commodore 64 prolly wouldn't play movies. The Commodore Amiga sure could, though. So could the few PC CLONES Commodore put out. Yeah, they made some 486s if I recall. They didnt' sell for crap in the states but then what commodore product after the 64 did?

  283. Junis, Money, me and /. Q and A by JonKatz · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was out of town yesterday and didn't get to read all of these posts till last nite.. Thanks for them..Some responses:

    l. Yes, I am quite certain I haven't been had. Junis has been e-mailing me since my Hotwired days, and if he unveiled a plot to deceive me, it's pretty complex and worthy of Le Carre. Lots of people posting are pretty assertive opinions about e-mail from Kabul, but as is often the case with people who know nothing, they are the most enthusiastic about demonstrating it. Many individuals, agencies, foreign and domestic in Afghanistan have been on the Net through the conflict and getting online is not a huge deal with the relatively affluent middle-class survivors around Kabul. I am quite confident about Junis's identity (but for obvious reasons, don't want to dwell on it), and that his e-mail is also genuine.
    2. Some of you have kindly offered to send money. He didn't ask for any and doesn't want any.
    3. A huge number of people have e-mailed me asking if he might do a Q and A..I'm sure he would, and I think it's a great idea. I'll try and set it up.

    1. Re:Junis, Money, me and /. Q and A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You made the claim you have to prove it Katz. You have not so far. What do you expect us to believe you with no proof? Shaha right!

    2. Re:Junis, Money, me and /. Q and A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would he email you talking about American pop culture and technology of all things it makes no sense. If he knows about the Microsoft trial and Survivor he knows what is going on in the West.

      If he knew what was going on here he would have talked to us about the bombing and what he felt, his spin on it.

    3. Re:Junis, Money, me and /. Q and A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your such an ass raider!

    4. Re:Junis, Money, me and /. Q and A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have been had!

    5. Re:Junis, Money, me and /. Q and A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was out of town yesterday and didn't get to read all of these posts till last nite.. Thanks for them..Some responses:
      l. Yes, I am quite certain I haven't been had. Junis has been e-mailing me since my Hotwired days, and if he unveiled a plot to deceive me, it's pretty complex and worthy of Le Carre. Lots of people posting are pretty assertive opinions about e-mail from Kabul, but as is often the case with people who know nothing, they are the most enthusiastic about demonstrating it. Many individuals, agencies, foreign and domestic in Afghanistan have been on the Net through the conflict and getting online is not a huge deal with the relatively affluent middle-class survivors around Kabul. I am quite confident about Junis's identity (but for obvious reasons, don't want to dwell on it), and that his e-mail is also genuine.
      2. Some of you have kindly offered to send money. He didn't ask for any and doesn't want any.
      3. A huge number of people have e-mailed me asking if he might do a Q and A..I'm sure he would, and I think it's a great idea. I'll try and set it up.

    6. Re:Junis, Money, me and /. Q and A by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      John,

      I hope you don't expect us to just simply take your word for it, right? You need to either provide some proof or fess up and admit you've been astronomically had.

      If you provide proof (which I think is not an unfair request) then I will eat my criticism with celery and become a troll for all eternity.
      And please don't give us the "well, he would be in danger if I told you where he was" deal, especially considering that his "opressors" are all but destroyed by now.

      I hope you excercise some open source journalism on this one.

    7. Re:Junis, Money, me and /. Q and A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one on slashdot is logical. They expect us to believe without proof. Is this place some kind of cult?

    8. Re:Junis, Money, me and /. Q and A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what has been related here it will be seen that Castruccio was a
      man of exceptional abilities, not only measured by men of his own
      time, but also by those of an earlier date. In stature he was above
      the ordinary height, and perfectly proportioned. He was of a gracious
      presence, and he welcomed men with such urbanity that those who spoke
      with him rarely left him displeased. His hair was inclined to be red,
      and he wore it cut short above the ears, and, whether it rained or
      snowed, he always went without a hat. He was delightful among friends,
      but terrible to his enemies; just to his subjects; ready to play false
      with the unfaithful, and willing to overcome by fraud those whom he
      desired to subdue, because he was wont to say that it was the victory
      that brought the glory, not the methods of achieving it. No one was
      bolder in facing danger, none more prudent in extricating himself. He
      was accustomed to say that men ought to attempt everything and fear
      nothing; that God is a lover of strong men, because one always sees
      that the weak are chastised by the strong. He was also wonderfully
      sharp or biting though courteous in his answers; and as he did not
      look for any indulgence in this way of speaking from others, so he was
      not angered with others did not show it to him. It has often happened
      that he has listened quietly when others have spoken sharply to him,
      as on the following occasions. He had caused a ducat to be given for a
      partridge, and was taken to task for doing so by a friend, to whom
      Castruccio had said: "You would not have given more than a penny."
      "That is true," answered the friend. Then said Castruccio to him: "A
      ducat is much less to me." Having about him a flatterer on whom he had
      spat to show that he scorned him, the flatterer said to him:
      "Fisherman are willing to let the waters of the sea saturate them in
      order that they make take a few little fishes, and I allow myself to
      be wetted by spittle that I may catch a whale"; and this was not only
      heard by Castruccio with patience but rewarded. When told by a priest
      that it was wicked for him to live so sumptuously, Castruccio said:
      "If that be a vice than you should not fare so splendidly at the
      feasts of our saints." Passing through a street he saw a young man as
      he came out of a house of ill fame blush at being seen by Castruccio,
      and said to him: "Thou shouldst not be ashamed when thou comest out,
      but when thou goest into such places." A friend gave him a very
      curiously tied knot to undo and was told: "Fool, do you think that I
      wish to untie a thing which gave so much trouble to fasten."
      Castruccio said to one who professed to be a philosopher: "You are
      like the dogs who always run after those who will give them the best
      to eat," and was answered: "We are rather like the doctors who go to
      the houses of those who have the greatest need of them." Going by
      water from Pisa to Leghorn, Castruccio was much disturbed by a
      dangerous storm that sprang up, and was reproached for cowardice by
      one of those with him, who said that he did not fear anything.
      Castruccio answered that he did not wonder at that, since every man
      valued his soul for what is was worth. Being asked by one what he
      ought to do to gain estimation, he said: "When thou goest to a banquet
      take care that thou dost not seat one piece of wood upon another." To
      a person who was boasting that he had read many things, Castruccio
      said: "He knows better than to boast of remembering many things."
      Someone bragged that he could drink much without becoming intoxicated.
      Castruccio replied: "An ox does the same." Castruccio was acquainted
      with a girl with whom he had intimate relations, and being blamed by a
      friend who told him that it was undignified for him to be taken in by
      a woman, he said: "She has not taken me in, I have taken her." Being
      also blamed for eating very dainty foods, he answered: "Thou dost not
      spend as much as I do?" and being told that it was true, he continued:
      "Then thou art more avaricious than I am gluttonous." Being invited by
      Taddeo Bernardi, a very rich and splendid citizen of Luca, to supper,
      he went to the house and was shown by Taddeo into a chamber hung with
      silk and paved with fine stones representing flowers and foliage of
      the most beautiful colouring. Castruccio gathered some saliva in his
      mouth and spat it out upon Taddeo, and seeing him much disturbed by
      this, said to him: "I knew not where to spit in order to offend thee
      less." Being asked how Caesar died he said: "God willing I will die as
      he did." Being one night in the house of one of his gentlemen where
      many ladies were assembled, he was reproved by one of his friends for
      dancing and amusing himself with them more than was usual in one of
      his station, so he said: "He who is considered wise by day will not be
      considered a fool at night." A person came to demand a favour of
      Castruccio, and thinking he was not listening to his plea threw
      himself on his knees to the ground, and being sharply reproved by
      Castruccio, said: "Thou art the reason of my acting thus for thou hast
      thy ears in thy feet," whereupon he obtained double the favour he had
      asked. Castruccio used to say that the way to hell was an easy one,
      seeing that it was in a downward direction and you travelled
      blindfolded. Being asked a favour by one who used many superfluous
      words, he said to him: "When you have another request to make, send
      someone else to make it." Having been wearied by a similar man with a
      long oration who wound up by saying: "Perhaps I have fatigued you by
      speaking so long," Castruccio said: "You have not, because I have not
      listened to a word you said." He used to say of one who had been a
      beautiful child and who afterwards became a fine man, that he was
      dangerous, because he first took the husbands from the wives and now
      he took the wives from their husbands. To an envious man who laughed,
      he said: "Do you laugh because you are successful or because another
      is unfortunate?" Whilst he was still in the charge of Messer Francesco
      Guinigi, one of his companions said to him: "What shall I give you if
      you will let me give you a blow on the nose?" Castruccio answered: "A
      helmet." Having put to death a citizen of Lucca who had been
      instrumental in raising him to power, and being told that he had done
      wrong to kill one of his old friends, he answered that people deceived
      themselves; he had only killed a new enemy. Castruccio praised greatly
      those men who intended to take a wife and then did not do so, saying
      that they were like men who said they would go to sea, and then
      refused when the time came. He said that it always struck him with
      surprise that whilst men in buying an earthen or glass vase would
      sound it first to learn if it were good, yet in choosing a wife they
      were content with only looking at her. He was once asked in what
      manner he would wish to be buried when he died, and answered: "With
      the face turned downwards, for I know when I am gone this country will
      be turned upside down." On being asked if it had ever occurred to him
      to become a friar in order to save his soul, he answered that it had
      not, because it appeared strange to him that Fra Lazerone should go to
      Paradise and Uguccione della Faggiuola to the Inferno. He was once
      asked when should a man eat to preserve his health, and replied: "If
      the man be rich let him eat when he is hungry; if he be poor, then
      when he can." Seeing on of his gentlemen make a member of his family
      lace him up, he said to him: "I pray God that you will let him feed
      you also." Seeing that someone had written upon his house in Latin the
      words: "May God preserve this house from the wicked," he said, "The
      owner must never go in." Passing through one of the streets he saw a
      small house with a very large door, and remarked: "That house will fly
      through the door." He was having a discussion with the ambassador of
      the King of Naples concerning the property of some banished nobles,
      when a dispute arose between them, and the ambassador asked him if he
      had no fear of the king. "Is this king of yours a bad man or a good
      one?" asked Castruccio, and was told that he was a good one, whereupon
      he said, "Why should you suggest that I should be afraid of a good
      man?"

    9. Re:Junis, Money, me and /. Q and A by kevlar · · Score: 2


      He'll never post it, because it doesn't exist. My personal opinnion is that he's full of it...

  284. Hardware, Software, Wetware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adilkno
    Hardware, Software, Wetware
    "If someone wants to talk about a New World Order without taking virtual reality
    into consideration, they'd better keep quiet." - John Sjerpstra
    Contact between the wet and the dry is a risky business, fraught with dangers.
    In practice these vary from a glass of juice in the toaster, a finger in an
    electric socket, a burst water main, to the collision of swelling passions with
    sober incomprehension. With its thin skin, hard bones and sticky fluids, the
    human body can be reasonably well defined as a problematic water management
    system whose boundaries are fluid. This aquanomy is marked again and again by
    pieces of cloth and scent markers as well as equipped with colorants and an aura
    of ramshackle social codes. These serve to prevent personal overflows from
    getting out of hand and to cover up little accidents.
    The closer we get to machines, the more wet zones are reclaimed. Depending on
    how technology approaches the body, boundaries are laid and erotic zones
    defined. Shifts may be read through clothing fashions, the dress of the poor wet
    slob who these days goes through life neatly and properly swaddled as a "Euro-
    citizen". At the end of the 20th century we see this thinking bio-pump being
    slung back and forth, panting and spluttering, between wet and dry, loose and
    fixed, fleeting and firm, intoxication and reason, static and signal, suddenly
    functional in the electronic environment. The watering and steaming Mensch
    factor has shocking effects on the machinery. The unavoidable contact between
    the wet finger and the keyboard has sparked a technological civilization
    offensive. Economy comes down more and more to the tightest possible interweave
    between social structures and electronic circuits.
    Until recently, sexual boundaries marked the danger zones. Because of this there
    had to be, for example, separate ladies' and gentlemen's fashion. This necessity
    has disappeared, and power is reaching for other means of styling fears and desires, while changing form itself. Fascist power was once a bulwark of sexual
    metaphors which could be reduced to one's own firm soil and pure, flowing blood.
    Divisions on grounds of sex and race were intended to destroy hybrids, and had
    political and military consequences.
    The antifascist Cold War which followed lasted long enough for racist and sexist
    thinking to bleed to death. The body politics of this era, now over, were
    characterized by the conditioning of the body on the new machines, which were no longer driven mechanically but electronically. Space travel furnished the basic
    model for electronic clothing, which, like power itself, has its attractive side
    as well as its frightening one. The first astronauts were animals, plastered
    with electrodes to register the reactions of the biological water management
    system. The futuristic spacesuit, in contrast, glittered and shone as prototype
    of the electronic New Order. The cosmic costume withstood the new dangerous conditions and came out shining, offered freedom of movement, provided
    protection, and guaranteed communication besides. This required a retraining of
    the body, which no longer came under the regime of religion or politics, but
    under the supervision of science. Extraterrestrial space travel, it turned out,
    was not an invention which would become available to the consumer after a
    developmental phase, but an experiment to test the body's reactions in an
    electronic situation under extreme conditions. Here, too, the clothing was not
    only outward show but dressage, and made it clear to the world population via
    the media what it means to be connected to a computer. The extraordinary quality
    of this superhuman performance in extraterrestrial space convinced humanity, the
    folks left at home, of the resounding success a sojourn into electronic space
    could have.
    After the explosion of the Challenger and the end of the dream of space, the way
    was made clear for ordinary mass production of the spacesuit. It has been
    redubbed the datasuit, with an introductory bonus known as the data glove. This awkward outfit provides the data worker with a fascinating going-out costume,
    with which he can dress up any location with any identity. It lets him get
    acquainted in a pleasant and noncommittal way with the new power type of the New Order. The premises of this are as follows: as commuter traffic dissolves and
    national borders blur, we are entering a clean, dust-free, sterile, medicinal
    space, which generates its own conception of dirt. Analagous to the danger zones
    in the era of sexual power, the thing now is the banishment of threats to the
    electronic condition. Classics like narcotic drugs, stupefying liquors and
    suffocating hazes of smoke appear as hot items of the reclamation politics which
    are spreading the New Order worldwide. This politics demands a strict anti-
    intoxication diet, if you want to ascend into hallucinogenic dataspace.
    Otherwise you'll lose the necessary concentration, and produce static.
    What's new about the electronic condition is the sitting still and the
    minimalization of biomechanical labour. This fundamental modification in the
    human water condition, which just like the Delta Plan could only have been
    realized under Cold War relations, causes a potential adjustment static in the
    introduction phase of digital hegemony which is combatted by an aerodynamic
    exercise program. The motorized Citybike as a fashion is an integral component
    of data policy, and isn't ridden by health devotees in fluorescent spacesuits
    for not- hing. Unlike the profligate yuppies of the 80s, the Euro-citizens of
    the 90s strive for total moderation: of their own nutritional and media diet as
    well as in government spending. The subsidy tap to them symbolizes waste, in
    flagrant contradiction to their recycling mania and investment sense.
    These cosy cocooners enjoy the freedom to stay at home and their greatest
    concern is the data roof over their heads. Refugees, who can't be traced in the
    files, are supposed to stay in their own area, or otherwise the UN and the EC
    with their developmental armies will lend them a helping hand. "If you people
    don't want any humanitarian aid, we'll shoot." The underlying motive for this
    military intervention is making global connections, which span the globe like a metastructure, healthy. To facilitate further expansion and innovation, those
    who are switched-off and dataless must keep quiet and stay in their own places.
    If necessary their ghettos and their written-off social wastelands are sealed
    shut by electronic security.
    Hardware, software, wetware are the three forms which the human/machine can take
    in the era of the New World Order. This trinity possesses its own geographical
    and historical coordinates. The hardware on which we play out all our culture and communication comes from Japan. The programs which make it possible for us
    to read, see and hear all this precious data come from the United States. And
    finally, the role of Europe is to deliver the necessary cultural products for shipment. Wetware's task is to cough up culture, which will be run on the
    Japanese hardware with the help of American software. In this international
    division of labour, what is expected of Europe is that she properly administer
    the legacy of Bach and Beethoven, maintain the paintings of Rembrandt and Van
    Gogh, and extend the Shakespeare-through-Beckett theatre tradition into the
    future. This is just as true for the media art which has appeared over the last
    few decades. The Europeans must figure out what things of beauty can be coaxed
    out of all this new equipment, for there is little pleasure to be derived from
    the functional use of the technology. Art is only charmed into being when the
    equipment is connected to the history of art, to philosophy and literature and
    those typically human charac- ter traits which have become European hallmarks.
    This is the lot which the Europeans, after so many blunders in this twen- tieth
    century, have called down upon themselves. Wetware means that we are condemned
    to making culture which avails itself of technical tools which have been
    designed by others. This need not be a subordinate position. On the contrary: a
    great deal is expected of us! What, after all, is a laptop computer with a word-
    processing program without all the wonderful stories that are written on it? Or
    a synthesizer without experimental compositions?
    Wetware is a body attached to machines. Wetware means that we have long been
    connected to the machines surrounding us; something which, as in the case of
    television, affords us a great deal of pleasure as well. If it's up to wetware, submission to the machines, as predicted by Orwell in 1984, need not be so
    dramatically represented. It need not result in slavish submission, for wetware
    has a secret weapon up its sleeve: its human, all too human, traits. The
    nickname "wetware" is an homage to the do-it-yourselfer who tries to make the
    best of things but always forgets the instructions. Flaws are deployed to
    safeguard dignity. Through ignorance, the urge to sabotage, and unbridled
    creativity, technology always goes haywire; from these accidents the most
    beautiful freaks spring forth, and after aesthetic treatment are effortlessly
    declared art. To wetware the user is not a remnant or something suppressed, but
    a born hobbyist who can hook together any old or new media into a personal
    reality, where an error message is at the beginning of a long series of resounding successes. The term wetware was coined by Rudy Rucker. He defines it
    as a collection of technological innovations: chips which are implanted in the
    brain, organ transplants and prostheses that replace or extend bodily functions.
    Unlike Rucker, adilkno considers the wetware idea not as a following phase to
    upset the wobbly self-image yet again after the revolutions in hard- and soft-
    ware, but as the "human remnant" who stays behind as the extensions go on longer
    and longer trips.
    At the end of the twentieth century, the autonomous individual trying to bring
    his gushing fears and desires into balance has come to stand in the shadow of
    the technological imperative. Managing or throwing open the channels appears to
    be dictated to a high degree on the available equipment. Wetware is conscious of
    this dependence and thus sees itself not as a potentate that rules over the
    machines, but as a watery appendage that must adjust as well as it can to the
    digital conditions of electronic data traffic.
    Acknowledgment of the technological a priori should not be confused with the
    hype which always arises when a new system comes on the market. The buzz
    generated by the new equipment creates an amnesia that results in a familiar pattern: the short-term effects of a technology are overestimated, while the
    long-term effects are given short shrift. It is characteristic of wetware to
    soak in a bubble bath of simulacra, and lose sight of the military prehistory of communications technology and of the nefarious plans being hatched by
    technocrats and marketing divisions. Wetware lets itself be easily fasci- nated
    and is not so quick to criticize when something new presents itself. We have
    become accustomed to the continual introduction of new products and techniques.
    A cycle is slowly becoming apparent: after a phase of rumours and spectacular
    presentations, the first lucky few get to show off the gadgets, and critics have
    a free- for-all. Only then can there be acceptance by society and a market large
    enough for capital to be interested. The new technologies cunningly present
    themsel- ves in the form of fashion and then fade into obscurity. This has
    recently happened with Minitel, video phones and mind machines. At the moment it
    is "virtual reality's" turn to make technological dreams material. Until now VR
    has been no more than one big flood of rumours for wetware. The global village
    where the techno-artists live has been turned upside down for a few years now:
    something big was supposed to happen...a megasystem was on its way that would
    nullify and engulf all media productions manufactured up to now, and suck on
    wetware like no other before.
    In the "out-of-body" experiments conducted in high-tech laboratories, VR has
    been described as a "doorway to other worlds." The distance between us and the
    screen becomes nil and we enter a "mental environment." VR is the "ultimate human-computer interface" (Rheingold) which encompasses all bodily movements and
    requires not even fingers nimble enough to operate a keyboard. VR (potentially)
    takes possession of the whole body in order to let the mind travel as far as
    possible. While all the senses, in the maximum state of titil- lation, are
    undertaking exhausting expeditions, the physical body remains behind in the
    "non-virtual world". Because all VR efforts are focused on the conquest of the
    sixth continent, the part that stays behind is temporarily overlooked. But then
    the wetware factor reports and returns to its own "tele-existence" as a "human
    bug". This is the instant at which wetware actually appears as a form. Despite hysterical stories of the instantaneous omnipresence of the zapping body in the
    live broadcast and the dissolution of locality as a natural milieu for the
    process of ego formation, the media user still stands up at regular intervals to
    grab a beer or take a piss. These moments of absence from the media do not occur
    in the cyberspace myth. In it, the body is in fact an abandoned station, and
    life is tantamount to data travel and digital immortality. Wetware finds this a
    fascinating thought, but laughs loudly, because something always gets in the
    way. The wet mensch recognizes himself for the first time as an equal
    counterpartner to the immaterial sphere. The wetware story begins as soon as it
    is clear that technology cannot live with or without the human.
    After the presentation of VR a Babylonian misunderstanding arose over what the
    consequences of this next techno revolution would be. The first report: the
    cyberpunk world portrayed by William Gibson would come true. Succeeding reports
    told us that the matrix a la Gibson, where the most intense hallucinations could
    be had, was still fiction: virtual reality in its infancy was nothing but a
    simple computer animation of a building or landscape in which you could rather jerkily look around. But even this disillusionment, which was reserved for the
    few who had gotten the chance to wear the VR helmet and the data glove, could
    not squelch the hype. By publicly distancing himself from the evangelization of Timothy Leary and other electronic cowboys of the VR business, Gibson narrowly
    prevented his term "cyberspace" from being tacked onto assorted carnival
    attractions. By Gibson's definition, cyberspace is more a neo-space where social fiction about human and machine unfolds than the name of a new technology. The
    first commercial applications were simply much too clean for the sopping
    cyberpunks.
    The first VR systems are already in operation on Wall Street, in the arcades of
    the amusement industry, in medical laboratories, in architects' offices and at
    NASA. These are not especially places where techno-artists, hackers and cyberpunks tend to have admittance. Thus, for wetware VR remains no more than a
    fleeting item about which exciting science fiction and hefty volumes are written
    and critical documentaries are aired. So far the public market is nowhere to be
    found. To reassure the folks in the street, John Barlow, head of the consumers'
    association Electronic Frontier Foundation, has proposed to stretch the
    definition of VR and bring it closer to the people by defining already existing electronic data traffic as part of cyberspace. He is trying to achieve a legal
    breakthrough by declaring this new imaginary zone free from copyright. Since,
    according to him, cyberspace is transnational, an international constitution for information ought to be drawn up.
    Now that computer hackers in the United States are followed by the CIA and the
    FBI, are slapped with hefty fines and are getting locked up, association with
    the world of virtual reality looks like an attractive option for hauling the
    hacking movement out of the repressive corner. Barlow's reasoning blames the
    problem on a fundamental lack of understanding about the current technological
    developments on the part of the authorities. Big names from the software world
    ought to call a halt to criminalization. But the question is how much we can
    expect from their end. Dreams of a great coalition between the upcoming VR
    giants and cyberpunks seem a bit naive. Even inside the small world of the VR
    pioneers, a tacky war is raging over copyrighting of the names given to the
    homemade projects. On the Electronic Frontier big capital and military interests
    silently recede into the background.
    Is it wetware's task to fill VR with European Kulturgut, as Jeffrey Shaw has
    done in his Legible City, where he connects the Dutch bicycle to the city maps
    of European cities like New York and Amsterdam via VR? This classic wetware strategy turns high-tech into art again by splicing the newest medium to a
    quaint, ecological and sweaty means of transport. The continental approach to
    technology always has an eye for the funny sides of the Human Flaw. For if the human bug is not treated with respect, the buckets are poised ready to cool off
    the the new medium. The new monsters must not be understood as a threat from
    outside, but made to dance in the new space. William Gibson articulated this insight in the phrase, "There's weird shit happening in the matrix," and had
    Voodoo Loa trot through cyberspace on a horse.
    A more realistic approach is the idea of virtual sex: safe as well as filthy.
    You have to understand the pornographic dimen- sion of a medium to be able to
    make it a success. The Dutch telephone company had to conclude that its introduction of the teleconference was a flop, until this same switchboard
    connection on the 06 "partylines" made the wildest fantasies reality. The
    question immediately popped up in virtual reality too: was sex good there, and
    which body parts get the nicest stimulation? Wetware won't get excited about a
    slicker design for the personal cognitive cluster. What's important is whether
    mistakes can be made in virtual reality and what kind of Faustian and/or
    Dionysian chain reactions they cause. Culture is always the consequence of
    decline, decadence, clumsy manouevres and misconceptions. Technology must
    establish itself inside it, and not make out to rise above it in order to
    magically evoke the Higher. Only then can there be a fusion between wetware and
    its hard- and software.
    no copyright 2001 textz.com - no rights reserved

  285. The Prince by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those who by valorous ways become princes, like these men, acquire a
    principality with difficulty, but they keep it with ease. The
    difficulties they have in acquiring it rise in part from the new rules
    and methods which they are forced to introduce to establish their
    government and its security. And it ought to be remembered that there
    is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct,
    or more uncertain in its success, then to take the lead in the
    introduction of a new order of things. Because the innovator has for
    enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and
    lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new. This
    coolness arises partly from fear of the opponents, who have the laws
    on their side, and partly from the incredulity of men, who do not
    readily believe in new things until they have had a long experience of
    them. Thus it happens that whenever those who are hostile have the
    opportunity to attack they do it like partisans, whilst the others
    defend lukewarmly, in such wise that the prince is endangered along
    with them.

    It is necessary, therefore, if we desire to discuss this matter
    thoroughly, to inquire whether these innovators can rely on themselves
    or have to depend on others: that is to say, whether, to consummate
    their enterprise, have they to use prayers or can they use force? In
    the first instance they always succeed badly, and never compass
    anything; but when they can rely on themselves and use force, then
    they are rarely endangered. Hence it is that all armed prophets have
    conquered, and the unarmed ones have been destroyed. Besides the
    reasons mentioned, the nature of the people is variable, and whilst it
    is easy to persuade them, it is difficult to fix them in that
    persuasion. And thus it is necessary to take such measures that, when
    they believe no longer, it may be possible to make them believe by
    force.

    If Moses, Cyrus, Theseus, and Romulus had been unarmed they could not
    have enforced their constitutions for long--as happened in our time to
    Fra Girolamo Savonarola, who was ruined with his new order of things
    immediately the multitude believed in him no longer, and he had no
    means of keeping steadfast those who believed or of making the
    unbelievers to believe. Therefore such as these have great
    difficulties in consummating their enterprise, for all their dangers
    are in the ascent, yet with ability they will overcome them; but when
    these are overcome, and those who envied them their success are
    exterminated, they will begin to be respected, and they will continue
    afterwards powerful, secure, honoured, and happy.

    To these great examples I wish to add a lesser one; still it bears
    some resemblance to them, and I wish it to suffice me for all of a
    like kind: it is Hiero the Syracusan.[*] This man rose from a private
    station to be Prince of Syracuse, nor did he, either, owe anything to
    fortune but opportunity; for the Syracusans, being oppressed, chose
    him for their captain, afterwards he was rewarded by being made their
    prince. He was of so great ability, even as a private citizen, that
    one who writes of him says he wanted nothing but a kingdom to be a
    king. This man abolished the old soldiery, organized the new, gave up
    old alliances, made new ones; and as he had his own soldiers and
    allies, on such foundations he was able to build any edifice: thus,
    whilst he had endured much trouble in acquiring, he had but little in
    keeping.

    [*] Hiero II, born about 307 B.C., died 216 B.C.

    CHAPTER VII

    CONCERNING NEW PRINCIPALITIES WHICH ARE ACQUIRED EITHER
    BY THE ARMS OF OTHERS OR BY GOOD FORTUNE

    Those who solely by good fortune become princes from being private
    citizens have little trouble in rising, but much in keeping atop; they
    have not any difficulties on the way up, because they fly, but they
    have many when they reach the summit. Such are those to whom some
    state is given either for money or by the favour of him who bestows
    it; as happened to many in Greece, in the cities of Ionia and of the
    Hellespont, where princes were made by Darius, in order that they
    might hold the cities both for his security and his glory; as also
    were those emperors who, by the corruption of the soldiers, from being
    citizens came to empire. Such stand simply elevated upon the goodwill
    and the fortune of him who has elevated them--two most inconstant and
    unstable things. Neither have they the knowledge requisite for the
    position; because, unless they are men of great worth and ability, it
    is not reasonable to expect that they should know how to command,
    having always lived in a private condition; besides, they cannot hold
    it because they have not forces which they can keep friendly and
    faithful.

    States that rise unexpectedly, then, like all other things in nature
    which are born and grow rapidly, cannot leave their foundations and
    correspondencies[*] fixed in such a way that the first storm will not
    overthrow them; unless, as is said, those who unexpectedly become
    princes are men of so much ability that they know they have to be
    prepared at once to hold that which fortune has thrown into their
    laps, and that those foundations, which others have laid BEFORE they
    became princes, they must lay AFTERWARDS.

    [*] "Le radici e corrispondenze," their roots (i.e. foundations) and
    correspondencies or relations with other states--a common meaning
    of "correspondence" and "correspondency" in the sixteenth and
    seventeenth centuries.

    Concerning these two methods of rising to be a prince by ability or
    fortune, I wish to adduce two examples within our own recollection,
    and these are Francesco Sforza[*] and Cesare Borgia. Francesco, by
    proper means and with great ability, from being a private person rose
    to be Duke of Milan, and that which he had acquired with a thousand
    anxieties he kept with little trouble. On the other hand, Cesare
    Borgia, called by the people Duke Valentino, acquired his state during
    the ascendancy of his father, and on its decline he lost it,
    notwithstanding that he had taken every measure and done all that
    ought to be done by a wise and able man to fix firmly his roots in the
    states which the arms and fortunes of others had bestowed on him.

    [*] Francesco Sforza, born 1401, died 1466. He married Bianca Maria
    Visconti, a natural daughter of Filippo Visconti, the Duke of
    Milan, on whose death he procured his own elevation to the duchy.
    Machiavelli was the accredited agent of the Florentine Republic to
    Cesare Borgia (1478-1507) during the transactions which led up to
    the assassinations of the Orsini and Vitelli at Sinigalia, and
    along with his letters to his chiefs in Florence he has left an
    account, written ten years before "The Prince," of the proceedings
    of the duke in his "Descritione del modo tenuto dal duca Valentino
    nello ammazzare Vitellozzo Vitelli," etc., a translation of which
    is appended to the present work.

    Because, as is stated above, he who has not first laid his foundations
    may be able with great ability to lay them afterwards, but they will
    be laid with trouble to the architect and danger to the building. If,
    therefore, all the steps taken by the duke be considered, it will be
    seen that he laid solid foundations for his future power, and I do not
    consider it superfluous to discuss them, because I do not know what
    better precepts to give a new prince than the example of his actions;
    and if his dispositions were of no avail, that was not his fault, but
    the extraordinary and extreme malignity of fortune.

    Alexander the Sixth, in wishing to aggrandize the duke, his son, had
    many immediate and prospective difficulties. Firstly, he did not see
    his way to make him master of any state that was not a state of the
    Church; and if he was willing to rob the Church he knew that the Duke
    of Milan and the Venetians would not consent, because Faenza and
    Rimini were already under the protection of the Venetians. Besides
    this, he saw the arms of Italy, especially those by which he might
    have been assisted, in hands that would fear the aggrandizement of the
    Pope, namely, the Orsini and the Colonnesi and their following. It
    behoved him, therefore, to upset this state of affairs and embroil the
    powers, so as to make himself securely master of part of their states.
    This was easy for him to do, because he found the Venetians, moved by
    other reasons, inclined to bring back the French into Italy; he would
    not only not oppose this, but he would render it more easy by
    dissolving the former marriage of King Louis. Therefore the king came
    into Italy with the assistance of the Venetians and the consent of
    Alexander. He was no sooner in Milan than the Pope had soldiers from
    him for the attempt on the Romagna, which yielded to him on the
    reputation of the king. The duke, therefore, having acquired the
    Romagna and beaten the Colonnesi, while wishing to hold that and to
    advance further, was hindered by two things: the one, his forces did
    not appear loyal to him, the other, the goodwill of France: that is to
    say, he feared that the forces of the Orsini, which he was using,
    would not stand to him, that not only might they hinder him from
    winning more, but might themselves seize what he had won, and that the
    king might also do the same. Of the Orsini he had a warning when,
    after taking Faenza and attacking Bologna, he saw them go very
    unwillingly to that attack. And as to the king, he learned his mind
    when he himself, after taking the Duchy of Urbino, attacked Tuscany,
    and the king made him desist from that undertaking; hence the duke
    decided to depend no more upon the arms and the luck of others.

    For the first thing he weakened the Orsini and Colonnesi parties in
    Rome, by gaining to himself all their adherents who were gentlemen,
    making them his gentlemen, giving them good pay, and, according to
    their rank, honouring them with office and command in such a way that
    in a few months all attachment to the factions was destroyed and
    turned entirely to the duke. After this he awaited an opportunity to
    crush the Orsini, having scattered the adherents of the Colonna house.
    This came to him soon and he used it well; for the Orsini, perceiving
    at length that the aggrandizement of the duke and the Church was ruin
    to them, called a meeting of the Magione in Perugia. From this sprung
    the rebellion at Urbino and the tumults in the Romagna, with endless
    dangers to the duke, all of which he overcame with the help of the
    French. Having restored his authority, not to leave it at risk by
    trusting either to the French or other outside forces, he had recourse
    to his wiles, and he knew so well how to conceal his mind that, by the
    mediation of Signor Pagolo--whom the duke did not fail to secure with
    all kinds of attention, giving him money, apparel, and horses--the
    Orsini were reconciled, so that their simplicity brought them into his
    power at Sinigalia.[*] Having exterminated the leaders, and turned
    their partisans into his friends, the duke laid sufficiently good
    foundations to his power, having all the Romagna and the Duchy of
    Urbino; and the people now beginning to appreciate their prosperity,
    he gained them all over to himself. And as this point is worthy of
    notice, and to be imitated by others, I am not willing to leave it
    out.

    [*] Sinigalia, 31st December 1502.

    When the duke occupied the Romagna he found it under the rule of weak
    masters, who rather plundered their subjects than ruled them, and gave
    them more cause for disunion than for union, so that the country was
    full of robbery, quarrels, and every kind of violence; and so, wishing
    to bring back peace and obedience to authority, he considered it
    necessary to give it a good governor. Thereupon he promoted Messer
    Ramiro d'Orco,[*] a swift and cruel man, to whom he gave the fullest
    power. This man in a short time restored peace and unity with the
    greatest success. Afterwards the duke considered that it was not
    advisable to confer such excessive authority, for he had no doubt but
    that he would become odious, so he set up a court of judgment in the
    country, under a most excellent president, wherein all cities had
    their advocates. And because he knew that the past severity had caused
    some hatred against himself, so, to clear himself in the minds of the
    people, and gain them entirely to himself, he desired to show that, if
    any cruelty had been practised, it had not originated with him, but in
    the natural sternness of the minister. Under this pretence he took
    Ramiro, and one morning caused him to be executed and left on the
    piazza at Cesena with the block and a bloody knife at his side. The
    barbarity of this spectacle caused the people to be at once satisfied
    and dismayed.

    [*] Ramiro d'Orco. Ramiro de Lorqua.

    But let us return whence we started. I say that the duke, finding
    himself now sufficiently powerful and partly secured from immediate
    dangers by having armed himself in his own way, and having in a great
    measure crushed those forces in his vicinity that could injure him if
    he wished to proceed with his conquest, had next to consider France,
    for he knew that the king, who too late was aware of his mistake,
    would not support him. And from this time he began to seek new
    alliances and to temporize with France in the expedition which she was
    making towards the kingdom of Naples against the Spaniards who were
    besieging Gaeta. It was his intention to secure himself against them,
    and this he would have quickly accomplished had Alexander lived.

    Such was his line of action as to present affairs. But as to the
    future he had to fear, in the first place, that a new successor to the
    Church might not be friendly to him and might seek to take from him
    that which Alexander had given him, so he decided to act in four ways.
    Firstly, by exterminating the families of those lords whom he had
    despoiled, so as to take away that pretext from the Pope. Secondly, by
    winning to himself all the gentlemen of Rome, so as to be able to curb
    the Pope with their aid, as has been observed. Thirdly, by converting
    the college more to himself. Fourthly, by acquiring so much power
    before the Pope should die that he could by his own measures resist
    the first shock. Of these four things, at the death of Alexander, he
    had accomplished three. For he had killed as many of the dispossessed
    lords as he could lay hands on, and few had escaped; he had won over
    the Roman gentlemen, and he had the most numerous party in the
    college. And as to any fresh acquisition, he intended to become master
    of Tuscany, for he already possessed Perugia and Piombino, and Pisa
    was under his protection. And as he had no longer to study France (for
    the French were already driven out of the kingdom of Naples by the
    Spaniards, and in this way both were compelled to buy his goodwill),
    he pounced down upon Pisa. After this, Lucca and Siena yielded at
    once, partly through hatred and partly through fear of the
    Florentines; and the Florentines would have had no remedy had he
    continued to prosper, as he was prospering the year that Alexander
    died, for he had acquired so much power and reputation that he would
    have stood by himself, and no longer have depended on the luck and the
    forces of others, but solely on his own power and ability.

    But Alexander died five years after he had first drawn the sword. He
    left the duke with the state of Romagna alone consolidated, with the
    rest in the air, between two most powerful hostile armies, and sick
    unto death. Yet there were in the duke such boldness and ability, and
    he knew so well how men are to be won or lost, and so firm were the
    foundations which in so short a time he had laid, that if he had not
    had those armies on his back, or if he had been in good health, he
    would have overcome all difficulties. And it is seen that his
    foundations were good, for the Romagna awaited him for more than a
    month. In Rome, although but half alive, he remained secure; and
    whilst the Baglioni, the Vitelli, and the Orsini might come to Rome,
    they could not effect anything against him. If he could not have made
    Pope him whom he wished, at least the one whom he did not wish would
    not have been elected. But if he had been in sound health at the death
    of Alexander,[*] everything would have been different to him. On the
    day that Julius the Second[+] was elected, he told me that he had
    thought of everything that might occur at the death of his father, and
    had provided a remedy for all, except that he had never anticipated
    that, when the death did happen, he himself would be on the point to
    die.

    [*] Alexander VI died of fever, 18th August 1503.

    [+] Julius II was Giuliano della Rovere, Cardinal of San Pietro ad
    Vincula, born 1443, died 1513.

  286. Machiavelli by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    CHAPTER X

    CONCERNING THE WAY IN WHICH THE STRENGTH OF ALL PRINCIPALITIES
    OUGHT TO BE MEASURED

    It is necessary to consider another point in examining the character
    of these principalities: that is, whether a prince has such power
    that, in case of need, he can support himself with his own resources,
    or whether he has always need of the assistance of others. And to make
    this quite clear I say that I consider those who are able to support
    themselves by their own resources who can, either by abundance of men
    or money, raise a sufficient army to join battle against any one who
    comes to attack them; and I consider those always to have need of
    others who cannot show themselves against the enemy in the field, but
    are forced to defend themselves by sheltering behind walls. The first
    case has been discussed, but we will speak of it again should it
    recur. In the second case one can say nothing except to encourage such
    princes to provision and fortify their towns, and not on any account
    to defend the country. And whoever shall fortify his town well, and
    shall have managed the other concerns of his subjects in the way
    stated above, and to be often repeated, will never be attacked without
    great caution, for men are always adverse to enterprises where
    difficulties can be seen, and it will be seen not to be an easy thing
    to attack one who has his town well fortified, and is not hated by his
    people.

    The cities of Germany are absolutely free, they own but little country
    around them, and they yield obedience to the emperor when it suits
    them, nor do they fear this or any other power they may have near
    them, because they are fortified in such a way that every one thinks
    the taking of them by assault would be tedious and difficult, seeing
    they have proper ditches and walls, they have sufficient artillery,
    and they always keep in public depots enough for one year's eating,
    drinking, and firing. And beyond this, to keep the people quiet and
    without loss to the state, they always have the means of giving work
    to the community in those labours that are the life and strength of
    the city, and on the pursuit of which the people are supported; they
    also hold military exercises in repute, and moreover have many
    ordinances to uphold them.

    Therefore, a prince who has a strong city, and had not made himself
    odious, will not be attacked, or if any one should attack he will only
    be driven off with disgrace; again, because that the affairs of this
    world are so changeable, it is almost impossible to keep an army a
    whole year in the field without being interfered with. And whoever
    should reply: If the people have property outside the city, and see it
    burnt, they will not remain patient, and the long siege and self-
    interest will make them forget their prince; to this I answer that a
    powerful and courageous prince will overcome all such difficulties by
    giving at one time hope to his subjects that the evil will not be for
    long, at another time fear of the cruelty of the enemy, then
    preserving himself adroitly from those subjects who seem to him to be
    too bold.

    Further, the enemy would naturally on his arrival at once burn and
    ruin the country at the time when the spirits of the people are still
    hot and ready for the defence; and, therefore, so much the less ought
    the prince to hesitate; because after a time, when spirits have
    cooled, the damage is already done, the ills are incurred, and there
    is no longer any remedy; and therefore they are so much the more ready
    to unite with their prince, he appearing to be under obligations to
    them now that their houses have been burnt and their possessions
    ruined in his defence. For it is the nature of men to be bound by the
    benefits they confer as much as by those they receive. Therefore, if
    everything is well considered, it will not be difficult for a wise
    prince to keep the minds of his citizens steadfast from first to last,
    when he does not fail to support and defend them.

    CHAPTER XI

    CONCERNING ECCLESIASTICAL PRINCIPALITIES

    It only remains now to speak of ecclesiastical principalities,
    touching which all difficulties are prior to getting possession,
    because they are acquired either by capacity or good fortune, and they
    can be held without either; for they are sustained by the ancient
    ordinances of religion, which are so all-powerful, and of such a
    character that the principalities may be held no matter how their
    princes behave and live. These princes alone have states and do not
    defend them; and they have subjects and do not rule them; and the
    states, although unguarded, are not taken from them, and the subjects,
    although not ruled, do not care, and they have neither the desire nor
    the ability to alienate themselves. Such principalities only are
    secure and happy. But being upheld by powers, to which the human mind
    cannot reach, I shall speak no more of them, because, being exalted
    and maintained by God, it would be the act of a presumptuous and rash
    man to discuss them.

    Nevertheless, if any one should ask of me how comes it that the Church
    has attained such greatness in temporal power, seeing that from
    Alexander backwards the Italian potentates (not only those who have
    been called potentates, but every baron and lord, though the smallest)
    have valued the temporal power very slightly--yet now a king of France
    trembles before it, and it has been able to drive him from Italy, and
    to ruin the Venetians--although this may be very manifest, it does not
    appear to me superfluous to recall it in some measure to memory.

    Before Charles, King of France, passed into Italy,[*] this country was
    under the dominion of the Pope, the Venetians, the King of Naples, the
    Duke of Milan, and the Florentines. These potentates had two principal
    anxieties: the one, that no foreigner should enter Italy under arms;
    the other, that none of themselves should seize more territory. Those
    about whom there was the most anxiety were the Pope and the Venetians.
    To restrain the Venetians the union of all the others was necessary,
    as it was for the defence of Ferrara; and to keep down the Pope they
    made use of the barons of Rome, who, being divided into two factions,
    Orsini and Colonnesi, had always a pretext for disorder, and, standing
    with arms in their hands under the eyes of the Pontiff, kept the
    pontificate weak and powerless. And although there might arise
    sometimes a courageous pope, such as Sixtus, yet neither fortune nor
    wisdom could rid him of these annoyances. And the short life of a pope
    is also a cause of weakness; for in the ten years, which is the
    average life of a pope, he can with difficulty lower one of the
    factions; and if, so to speak, one people should almost destroy the
    Colonnesi, another would arise hostile to the Orsini, who would
    support their opponents, and yet would not have time to ruin the
    Orsini. This was the reason why the temporal powers of the pope were
    little esteemed in Italy.

    [*] Charles VIII invaded Italy in 1494.

    Alexander the Sixth arose afterwards, who of all the pontiffs that
    have ever been showed how a pope with both money and arms was able to
    prevail; and through the instrumentality of the Duke Valentino, and by
    reason of the entry of the French, he brought about all those things
    which I have discussed above in the actions of the duke. And although
    his intention was not to aggrandize the Church, but the duke,
    nevertheless, what he did contributed to the greatness of the Church,
    which, after his death and the ruin of the duke, became the heir to
    all his labours.

    Pope Julius came afterwards and found the Church strong, possessing
    all the Romagna, the barons of Rome reduced to impotence, and, through
    the chastisements of Alexander, the factions wiped out; he also found
    the way open to accumulate money in a manner such as had never been
    practised before Alexander's time. Such things Julius not only
    followed, but improved upon, and he intended to gain Bologna, to ruin
    the Venetians, and to drive the French out of Italy. All of these
    enterprises prospered with him, and so much the more to his credit,
    inasmuch as he did everything to strengthen the Church and not any
    private person. He kept also the Orsini and Colonnesi factions within
    the bounds in which he found them; and although there was among them
    some mind to make disturbance, nevertheless he held two things firm:
    the one, the greatness of the Church, with which he terrified them;
    and the other, not allowing them to have their own cardinals, who
    caused the disorders among them. For whenever these factions have
    their cardinals they do not remain quiet for long, because cardinals
    foster the factions in Rome and out of it, and the barons are
    compelled to support them, and thus from the ambitions of prelates
    arise disorders and tumults among the barons. For these reasons his
    Holiness Pope Leo[*] found the pontificate most powerful, and it is to
    be hoped that, if others made it great in arms, he will make it still
    greater and more venerated by his goodness and infinite other virtues.

    [*] Pope Leo X was the Cardinal de' Medici.

    CHAPTER XII

    HOW MANY KINDS OF SOLDIERY THERE ARE, AND CONCERNING MERCENARIES

    Having discoursed particularly on the characteristics of such
    principalities as in the beginning I proposed to discuss, and having
    considered in some degree the causes of their being good or bad, and
    having shown the methods by which many have sought to acquire them and
    to hold them, it now remains for me to discuss generally the means of
    offence and defence which belong to each of them.

    We have seen above how necessary it is for a prince to have his
    foundations well laid, otherwise it follows of necessity he will go to
    ruin. The chief foundations of all states, new as well as old or
    composite, are good laws and good arms; and as there cannot be good
    laws where the state is not well armed, it follows that where they are
    well armed they have good laws. I shall leave the laws out of the
    discussion and shall speak of the arms.

    I say, therefore, that the arms with which a prince defends his state
    are either his own, or they are mercenaries, auxiliaries, or mixed.
    Mercenaries and auxiliaries are useless and dangerous; and if one
    holds his state based on these arms, he will stand neither firm nor
    safe; for they are disunited, ambitious, and without discipline,
    unfaithful, valiant before friends, cowardly before enemies; they have
    neither the fear of God nor fidelity to men, and destruction is
    deferred only so long as the attack is; for in peace one is robbed by
    them, and in war by the enemy. The fact is, they have no other
    attraction or reason for keeping the field than a trifle of stipend,
    which is not sufficient to make them willing to die for you. They are
    ready enough to be your soldiers whilst you do not make war, but if
    war comes they take themselves off or run from the foe; which I should
    have little trouble to prove, for the ruin of Italy has been caused by
    nothing else than by resting all her hopes for many years on
    mercenaries, and although they formerly made some display and appeared
    valiant amongst themselves, yet when the foreigners came they showed
    what they were. Thus it was that Charles, King of France, was allowed
    to seize Italy with chalk in hand;[*] and he who told us that our sins
    were the cause of it told the truth, but they were not the sins he
    imagined, but those which I have related. And as they were the sins of
    princes, it is the princes who have also suffered the penalty.

    [*] "With chalk in hand," "col gesso." This is one of the bons mots of
    Alexander VI, and refers to the ease with which Charles VIII
    seized Italy, implying that it was only necessary for him to send
    his quartermasters to chalk up the billets for his soldiers to
    conquer the country. Cf. "The History of Henry VII," by Lord
    Bacon: "King Charles had conquered the realm of Naples, and lost
    it again, in a kind of a felicity of a dream. He passed the whole
    length of Italy without resistance: so that it was true what Pope
    Alexander was wont to say: That the Frenchmen came into Italy with
    chalk in their hands, to mark up their lodgings, rather than with
    swords to fight."

    I wish to demonstrate further the infelicity of these arms. The
    mercenary captains are either capable men or they are not; if they
    are, you cannot trust them, because they always aspire to their own
    greatness, either by oppressing you, who are their master, or others
    contrary to your intentions; but if the captain is not skilful, you
    are ruined in the usual way.

    And if it be urged that whoever is armed will act in the same way,
    whether mercenary or not, I reply that when arms have to be resorted
    to, either by a prince or a republic, then the prince ought to go in
    person and perform the duty of a captain; the republic has to send its
    citizens, and when one is sent who does not turn out satisfactorily,
    it ought to recall him, and when one is worthy, to hold him by the
    laws so that he does not leave the command. And experience has shown
    princes and republics, single-handed, making the greatest progress,
    and mercenaries doing nothing except damage; and it is more difficult
    to bring a republic, armed with its own arms, under the sway of one of
    its citizens than it is to bring one armed with foreign arms. Rome and
    Sparta stood for many ages armed and free. The Switzers are completely
    armed and quite free.

    Of ancient mercenaries, for example, there are the Carthaginians, who
    were oppressed by their mercenary soldiers after the first war with
    the Romans, although the Carthaginians had their own citizens for
    captains. After the death of Epaminondas, Philip of Macedon was made
    captain of their soldiers by the Thebans, and after victory he took
    away their liberty.

    Duke Filippo being dead, the Milanese enlisted Francesco Sforza
    against the Venetians, and he, having overcome the enemy at
    Caravaggio,[*] allied himself with them to crush the Milanese, his
    masters. His father, Sforza, having been engaged by Queen Johanna[+]
    of Naples, left her unprotected, so that she was forced to throw
    herself into the arms of the King of Aragon, in order to save her
    kingdom. And if the Venetians and Florentines formerly extended their
    dominions by these arms, and yet their captains did not make
    themselves princes, but have defended them, I reply that the
    Florentines in this case have been favoured by chance, for of the able
    captains, of whom they might have stood in fear, some have not
    conquered, some have been opposed, and others have turned their
    ambitions elsewhere. One who did not conquer was Giovanni Acuto,[%]
    and since he did not conquer his fidelity cannot be proved; but every
    one will acknowledge that, had he conquered, the Florentines would
    have stood at his discretion. Sforza had the Bracceschi always against
    him, so they watched each other. Francesco turned his ambition to
    Lombardy; Braccio against the Church and the kingdom of Naples. But
    let us come to that which happened a short while ago. The Florentines
    appointed as their captain Pagolo Vitelli, a most prudent man, who
    from a private position had risen to the greatest renown. If this man
    had taken Pisa, nobody can deny that it would have been proper for the
    Florentines to keep in with him, for if he became the soldier of their
    enemies they had no means of resisting, and if they held to him they
    must obey him. The Venetians, if their achievements are considered,
    will be seen to have acted safely and gloriously so long as they sent
    to war their own men, when with armed gentlemen and plebians they did
    valiantly. This was before they turned to enterprises on land, but
    when they began to fight on land they forsook this virtue and followed
    the custom of Italy. And in the beginning of their expansion on land,
    through not having much territory, and because of their great
    reputation, they had not much to fear from their captains; but when
    they expanded, as under Carmignuola,[#] they had a taste of this
    mistake; for, having found him a most valiant man (they beat the Duke
    of Milan under his leadership), and, on the other hand, knowing how
    lukewarm he was in the war, they feared they would no longer conquer
    under him, and for this reason they were not willing, nor were they
    able, to let him go; and so, not to lose again that which they had
    acquired, they were compelled, in order to secure themselves, to
    murder him. They had afterwards for their captains Bartolomeo da
    Bergamo, Roberto da San Severino, the count of Pitigliano,[&] and the
    like, under whom they had to dread loss and not gain, as happened
    afterwards at Vaila,[$] where in one battle they lost that which in
    eight hundred years they had acquired with so much trouble. Because
    from such arms conquests come but slowly, long delayed and
    inconsiderable, but the losses sudden and portentous.

    [*] Battle of Caravaggio, 15th September 1448.

    [+] Johanna II of Naples, the widow of Ladislao, King of Naples.

    [%] Giovanni Acuto. An English knight whose name was Sir John
    Hawkwood. He fought in the English wars in France, and was
    knighted by Edward III; afterwards he collected a body of troops
    and went into Italy. These became the famous "White Company." He
    took part in many wars, and died in Florence in 1394. He was born
    about 1320 at Sible Hedingham, a village in Essex. He married
    Domnia, a daughter of Bernabo Visconti.

    [#] Carmignuola. Francesco Bussone, born at Carmagnola about 1390,
    executed at Venice, 5th May 1432.

    [&] Bartolomeo Colleoni of Bergamo; died 1457. Roberto of San
    Severino; died fighting for Venice against Sigismund, Duke of
    Austria, in 1487. "Primo capitano in Italia."--Machiavelli. Count
    of Pitigliano; Nicolo Orsini, born 1442, died 1510.

    [$] Battle of Vaila in 1509.

    And as with these examples I have reached Italy, which has been ruled
    for many years by mercenaries, I wish to discuss them more seriously,
    in order that, having seen their rise and progress, one may be better
    prepared to counteract them. You must understand that the empire has
    recently come to be repudiated in Italy, that the Pope has acquired
    more temporal power, and that Italy has been divided up into more
    states, for the reason that many of the great cities took up arms
    against their nobles, who, formerly favoured by the emperor, were
    oppressing them, whilst the Church was favouring them so as to gain
    authority in temporal power: in many others their citizens became
    princes. From this it came to pass that Italy fell partly into the
    hands of the Church and of republics, and, the Church consisting of
    priests and the republic of citizens unaccustomed to arms, both
    commenced to enlist foreigners.

    The first who gave renown to this soldiery was Alberigo da Conio,[*]
    the Romagnian. From the school of this man sprang, among others,
    Braccio and Sforza, who in their time were the arbiters of Italy.
    After these came all the other captains who till now have directed the
    arms of Italy; and the end of all their valour has been, that she has
    been overrun by Charles, robbed by Louis, ravaged by Ferdinand, and
    insulted by the Switzers. The principle that has guided them has been,
    first, to lower the credit of infantry so that they might increase
    their own. They did this because, subsisting on their pay and without
    territory, they were unable to support many soldiers, and a few
    infantry did not give them any authority; so they were led to employ
    cavalry, with a moderate force of which they were maintained and
    honoured; and affairs were brought to such a pass that, in an army of
    twenty thousand soldiers, there were not to be found two thousand foot
    soldiers. They had, besides this, used every art to lessen fatigue and
    danger to themselves and their soldiers, not killing in the fray, but
    taking prisoners and liberating without ransom. They did not attack
    towns at night, nor did the garrisons of the towns attack encampments
    at night; they did not surround the camp either with stockade or
    ditch, nor did they campaign in the winter. All these things were
    permitted by their military rules, and devised by them to avoid, as I
    have said, both fatigue and dangers; thus they have brought Italy to
    slavery and contempt.

    [*] Alberigo da Conio. Alberico da Barbiano, Count of Cunio in
    Romagna. He was the leader of the famous "Company of St George,"
    composed entirely of Italian soldiers. He died in 1409.

    CHAPTER XIII

    CONCERNING AUXILIARIES, MIXED SOLDIERY, AND ONE'S OWN

    Auxiliaries, which are the other useless arm, are employed when a
    prince is called in with his forces to aid and defend, as was done by
    Pope Julius in the most recent times; for he, having, in the
    enterprise against Ferrara, had poor proof of his mercenaries, turned
    to auxiliaries, and stipulated with Ferdinand, King of Spain,[*] for
    his assistance with men and arms. These arms may be useful and good in
    themselves, but for him who calls them in they are always
    disadvantageous; for losing, one is undone, and winning, one is their
    captive.

    [*] Ferdinand V (F. II of Aragon and Sicily, F. III of Naples),
    surnamed "The Catholic," born 1542, died 1516.

    And although ancient histories may be full of examples, I do not wish
    to leave this recent one of Pope Julius the Second, the peril of which
    cannot fail to be perceived; for he, wishing to get Ferrara, threw
    himself entirely into the hands of the foreigner. But his good fortune
    brought about a third event, so that he did not reap the fruit of his
    rash choice; because, having his auxiliaries routed at Ravenna, and
    the Switzers having risen and driven out the conquerors (against all
    expectation, both his and others), it so came to pass that he did not
    become prisoner to his enemies, they having fled, nor to his
    auxiliaries, he having conquered by other arms than theirs.

    The Florentines, being entirely without arms, sent ten thousand
    Frenchmen to take Pisa, whereby they ran more danger than at any other
    time of their troubles.

    The Emperor of Constantinople,[*] to oppose his neighbours, sent ten
    thousand Turks into Greece, who, on the war being finished, were not
    willing to quit; this was the beginning of the servitude of Greece to
    the infidels.

    [*] Joannes Cantacuzenus, born 1300, died 1383.

    Therefore, let him who has no desire to conquer make use of these
    arms, for they are much more hazardous than mercenaries, because with
    them the ruin is ready made; they are all united, all yield obedience
    to others; but with mercenaries, when they have conquered, more time
    and better opportunities are needed to injure you; they are not all of
    one community, they are found and paid by you, and a third party,
    which you have made their head, is not able all at once to assume
    enough authority to injure you. In conclusion, in mercenaries dastardy
    is most dangerous; in auxiliaries, valour. The wise prince, therefore,
    has always avoided these arms and turned to his own; and has been
    willing rather to lose with them than to conquer with the others, not
    deeming that a real victory which is gained with the arms of others.

    I shall never hesitate to cite Cesare Borgia and his actions. This
    duke entered the Romagna with auxiliaries, taking there only French
    soldiers, and with them he captured Imola and Forli; but afterwards,
    such forces not appearing to him reliable, he turned to mercenaries,
    discerning less danger in them, and enlisted the Orsini and Vitelli;
    whom presently, on handling and finding them doubtful, unfaithful, and
    dangerous, he destroyed and turned to his own men. And the difference
    between one and the other of these forces can easily be seen when one
    considers the difference there was in the reputation of the duke, when
    he had the French, when he had the Orsini and Vitelli, and when he
    relied on his own soldiers, on whose fidelity he could always count
    and found it ever increasing; he was never esteemed more highly than
    when every one saw that he was complete master of his own forces.

    I was not intending to go beyond Italian and recent examples, but I am
    unwilling to leave out Hiero, the Syracusan, he being one of those I
    have named above. This man, as I have said, made head of the army by
    the Syracusans, soon found out that a mercenary soldiery, constituted
    like our Italian condottieri, was of no use; and it appearing to him
    that he could neither keep them not let them go, he had them all cut
    to pieces, and afterwards made war with his own forces and not with
    aliens.

    I wish also to recall to memory an instance from the Old Testament
    applicable to this subject. David offered himself to Saul to fight
    with Goliath, the Philistine champion, and, to give him courage, Saul
    armed him with his own weapons; which David rejected as soon as he had
    them on his back, saying he could make no use of them, and that he
    wished to meet the enemy with his sling and his knife. In conclusion,
    the arms of others either fall from your back, or they weigh you down,
    or they bind you fast.

    Charles the Seventh,[*] the father of King Louis the Eleventh,[+]
    having by good fortune and valour liberated France from the English,
    recognized the necessity of being armed with forces of his own, and he
    established in his kingdom ordinances concerning men-at-arms and
    infantry. Afterwards his son, King Louis, abolished the infantry and
    began to enlist the Switzers, which mistake, followed by others, is,
    as is now seen, a source of peril to that kingdom; because, having
    raised the reputation of the Switzers, he has entirely diminished the
    value of his own arms, for he has destroyed the infantry altogether;
    and his men-at-arms he has subordinated to others, for, being as they
    are so accustomed to fight along with Switzers, it does not appear
    that they can now conquer without them. Hence it arises that the
    French cannot stand against the Switzers, and without the Switzers
    they do not come off well against others. The armies of the French
    have thus become mixed, partly mercenary and partly national, both of
    which arms together are much better than mercenaries alone or
    auxiliaries alone, but much inferior to one's own forces. And this
    example proves it, for the kingdom of France would be unconquerable if
    the ordinance of Charles had been enlarged or maintained.

    [*] Charles VII of France, surnamed "The Victorious," born 1403, died
    1461.

    [+] Louis XI, son of the above, born 1423, died 1483.

    But the scanty wisdom of man, on entering into an affair which looks
    well at first, cannot discern the poison that is hidden in it, as I
    have said above of hectic fevers. Therefore, if he who rules a
    principality cannot recognize evils until they are upon him, he is not
    truly wise; and this insight is given to few. And if the first
    disaster to the Roman Empire[*] should be examined, it will be found
    to have commenced only with the enlisting of the Goths; because from
    that time the vigour of the Roman Empire began to decline, and all
    that valour which had raised it passed away to others.

    [*] "Many speakers to the House the other night in the debate on the
    reduction of armaments seemed to show a most lamentable ignorance
    of the conditions under which the British Empire maintains its
    existence. When Mr Balfour replied to the allegations that the
    Roman Empire sank under the weight of its military obligations, he
    said that this was 'wholly unhistorical.' He might well have added
    that the Roman power was at its zenith when every citizen
    acknowledged his liability to fight for the State, but that it
    began to decline as soon as this obligation was no longer
    recognized."--Pall Mall Gazette, 15th May 1906.

    I conclude, therefore, that no principality is secure without having
    its own forces; on the contrary, it is entirely dependent on good
    fortune, not having the valour which in adversity would defend it. And
    it has always been the opinion and judgment of wise men that nothing
    can be so uncertain or unstable as fame or power not founded on its
    own strength. And one's own forces are those which are composed either
    of subjects, citizens, or dependents; all others are mercenaries or
    auxiliaries. And the way to make ready one's own forces will be easily
    found if the rules suggested by me shall be reflected upon, and if one
    will consider how Philip, the father of Alexander the Great, and many
    republics and princes have armed and organized themselves, to which
    rules I entirely commit myself.

    CHAPTER XIV

    THAT WHICH CONCERNS A PRINCE ON THE SUBJECT OF THE ART OF WAR

    A prince ought to have no other aim or thought, nor select anything
    else for his study, than war and its rules and discipline; for this is
    the sole art that belongs to him who rules, and it is of such force
    that it not only upholds those who are born princes, but it often
    enables men to rise from a private station to that rank. And, on the
    contrary, it is seen that when princes have thought more of ease than
    of arms they have lost their states. And the first cause of your
    losing it is to neglect this art; and what enables you to acquire a
    state is to be master of the art. Francesco Sforza, through being
    martial, from a private person became Duke of Milan; and the sons,
    through avoiding the hardships and troubles of arms, from dukes became
    private persons. For among other evils which being unarmed brings you,
    it causes you to be despised, and this is one of those ignominies
    against which a prince ought to guard himself, as is shown later on.
    Because there is nothing proportionate between the armed and the
    unarmed; and it is not reasonable that he who is armed should yield
    obedience willingly to him who is unarmed, or that the unarmed man
    should be secure among armed servants. Because, there being in the one
    disdain and in the other suspicion, it is not possible for them to
    work well together. And therefore a prince who does not understand the
    art of war, over and above the other misfortunes already mentioned,
    cannot be respected by his soldiers, nor can he rely on them. He ought
    never, therefore, to have out of his thoughts this subject of war, and
    in peace he should addict himself more to its exercise than in war;
    this he can do in two ways, the one by action, the other by study.

    As regards action, he ought above all things to keep his men well
    organized and drilled, to follow incessantly the chase, by which he
    accustoms his body to hardships, and learns something of the nature of
    localities, and gets to find out how the mountains rise, how the
    valleys open out, how the plains lie, and to understand the nature of
    rivers and marshes, and in all this to take the greatest care. Which
    knowledge is useful in two ways. Firstly, he learns to know his
    country, and is better able to undertake its defence; afterwards, by
    means of the knowledge and observation of that locality, he
    understands with ease any other which it may be necessary for him to
    study hereafter; because the hills, valleys, and plains, and rivers
    and marshes that are, for instance, in Tuscany, have a certain
    resemblance to those of other countries, so that with a knowledge of
    the aspect of one country one can easily arrive at a knowledge of
    others. And the prince that lacks this skill lacks the essential which
    it is desirable that a captain should possess, for it teaches him to
    surprise his enemy, to select quarters, to lead armies, to array the
    battle, to besiege towns to advantage.

    Philopoemen,[*] Prince of the Achaeans, among other praises which
    writers have bestowed on him, is commended because in time of peace he
    never had anything in his mind but the rules of war; and when he was
    in the country with friends, he often stopped and reasoned with them:
    "If the enemy should be upon that hill, and we should find ourselves
    here with our army, with whom would be the advantage? How should one
    best advance to meet him, keeping the ranks? If we should wish to
    retreat, how ought we to pursue?" And he would set forth to them, as
    he went, all the chances that could befall an army; he would listen to
    their opinion and state his, confirming it with reasons, so that by
    these continual discussions there could never arise, in time of war,
    any unexpected circumstances that he could not deal with.

    [*] Philopoemen, "the last of the Greeks," born 252 B.C., died 183
    B.C.

    But to exercise the intellect the prince should read histories, and
    study there the actions of illustrious men, to see how they have borne
    themselves in war, to examine the causes of their victories and
    defeat, so as to avoid the latter and imitate the former; and above
    all do as an illustrious man did, who took as an exemplar one who had
    been praised and famous before him, and whose achievements and deeds
    he always kept in his mind, as it is said Alexander the Great imitated
    Achilles, Caesar Alexander, Scipio Cyrus. And whoever reads the life
    of Cyrus, written by Xenophon, will recognize afterwards in the life
    of Scipio how that imitation was his glory, and how in chastity,
    affability, humanity, and liberality Scipio conformed to those things
    which have been written of Cyrus by Xenophon. A wise prince ought to
    observe some such rules, and never in peaceful times stand idle, but
    increase his resources with industry in such a way that they may be
    available to him in adversity, so that if fortune chances it may find
    him prepared to resist her blows.

    CHAPTER XV

    CONCERNING THINGS FOR WHICH MEN, AND ESPECIALLY PRINCES,
    ARE PRAISED OR BLAMED

    It remains now to see what ought to be the rules of conduct for a
    prince towards subject and friends. And as I know that many have
    written on this point, I expect I shall be considered presumptuous in
    mentioning it again, especially as in discussing it I shall depart
    from the methods of other people. But, it being my intention to write
    a thing which shall be useful to him who apprehends it, it appears to
    me more appropriate to follow up the real truth of the matter than the
    imagination of it; for many have pictured republics and principalities
    which in fact have never been known or seen, because how one lives is
    so far distant from how one ought to live, that he who neglects what
    is done for what ought to be done, sooner effects his ruin than his
    preservation; for a man who wishes to act entirely up to his
    professions of virtue soon meets with what destroys him among so much
    that is evil.

    Hence it is necessary for a prince wishing to hold his own to know how
    to do wrong, and to make use of it or not according to necessity.
    Therefore, putting on one side imaginary things concerning a prince,
    and discussing those which are real, I say that all men when they are
    spoken of, and chiefly princes for being more highly placed, are
    remarkable for some of those qualities which bring them either blame
    or praise; and thus it is that one is reputed liberal, another
    miserly, using a Tuscan term (because an avaricious person in our
    language is still he who desires to possess by robbery, whilst we call
    one miserly who deprives himself too much of the use of his own); one
    is reputed generous, one rapacious; one cruel, one compassionate; one
    faithless, another faithful; one effeminate and cowardly, another bold
    and brave; one affable, another haughty; one lascivious, another
    chaste; one sincere, another cunning; one hard, another easy; one
    grave, another frivolous; one religious, another unbelieving, and the
    like. And I know that every one will confess that it would be most
    praiseworthy in a prince to exhibit all the above qualities that are
    considered good; but because they can neither be entirely possessed
    nor observed, for human conditions do not permit it, it is necessary
    for him to be sufficiently prudent that he may know how to avoid the
    reproach of those vices which would lose him his state; and also to
    keep himself, if it be possible, from those which would not lose him
    it; but this not being possible, he may with less hesitation abandon
    himself to them. And again, he need not make himself uneasy at
    incurring a reproach for those vices without which the state can only
    be saved with difficulty, for if everything is considered carefully,
    it will be found that something which looks like virtue, if followed,
    would be his ruin; whilst something else, which looks like vice, yet
    followed brings him security and prosperity.

    CHAPTER XVI

    CONCERNING LIBERALITY AND MEANNESS

    Commencing then with the first of the above-named characteristics, I
    say that it would be well to be reputed liberal. Nevertheless,
    liberality exercised in a way that does not bring you the reputation
    for it, injures you; for if one exercises it honestly and as it should
    be exercised, it may not become known, and you will not avoid the
    reproach of its opposite. Therefore, any one wishing to maintain among
    men the name of liberal is obliged to avoid no attribute of
    magnificence; so that a prince thus inclined will consume in such acts
    all his property, and will be compelled in the end, if he wish to
    maintain the name of liberal, to unduly weigh down his people, and tax
    them, and do everything he can to get money. This will soon make him
    odious to his subjects, and becoming poor he will be little valued by
    any one; thus, with his liberality, having offended many and rewarded
    few, he is affected by the very first trouble and imperilled by
    whatever may be the first danger; recognizing this himself, and
    wishing to draw back from it, he runs at once into the reproach of
    being miserly.

  287. Hrmmm... by scanman857 · · Score: 1

    Back in 1998, it took me 2 months to download "The Matrix" over my 14.4k modem, to watch on my K6-366 computer... Now this kid is watching "Independence Day" on his Commodore 64 while listening to MP3s after being on the net for little over one day? Ahhh huh... Katz, if you're going to make up stories on slow news days, you could at least make them remotely plausible.

  288. Re:Let's see what other inconsistencies we can fin by Chooker · · Score: 1

    You forgot one thing, El Leeji Presidente, and that is:

    4. Anyone who had enough brains to use the internet there has jumped ship (literally) and ended up here, the promised land of Australia, or died trying... sure he may be from Kabul, but only had enough money to get internet access when his parents got here, and he thought he may have some fun with the dumb fucks that work in american press.

    Ahhh... bask in the light of my genius, pilgrims

    --

    --
    "I feel so cold, on hookers and gin... this mess we're in"
  289. Yitani by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CHAPTER VI

    CONCERNING NEW PRINCIPALITIES WHICH ARE ACQUIRED
    BY ONE'S OWN ARMS AND ABILITY

    Let no one be surprised if, in speaking of entirely new principalities
    as I shall do, I adduce the highest examples both of prince and of
    state; because men, walking almost always in paths beaten by others,
    and following by imitation their deeds, are yet unable to keep
    entirely to the ways of others or attain to the power of those they
    imitate. A wise man ought always to follow the paths beaten by great
    men, and to imitate those who have been supreme, so that if his
    ability does not equal theirs, at least it will savour of it. Let him
    act like the clever archers who, designing to hit the mark which yet
    appears too far distant, and knowing the limits to which the strength
    of their bow attains, take aim much higher than the mark, not to reach
    by their strength or arrow to so great a height, but to be able with
    the aid of so high an aim to hit the mark they wish to reach.

    I say, therefore, that in entirely new principalities, where there is
    a new prince, more or less difficulty is found in keeping them,
    accordingly as there is more or less ability in him who has acquired
    the state. Now, as the fact of becoming a prince from a private
    station presupposes either ability or fortune, it is clear that one or
    other of these things will mitigate in some degree many difficulties.
    Nevertheless, he who has relied least on fortune is established the
    strongest. Further, it facilitates matters when the prince, having no
    other state, is compelled to reside there in person.

    But to come to those who, by their own ability and not through
    fortune, have risen to be princes, I say that Moses, Cyrus, Romulus,
    Theseus, and such like are the most excellent examples. And although
    one may not discuss Moses, he having been a mere executor of the will
    of God, yet he ought to be admired, if only for that favour which made
    him worthy to speak with God. But in considering Cyrus and others who
    have acquired or founded kingdoms, all will be found admirable; and if
    their particular deeds and conduct shall be considered, they will not
    be found inferior to those of Moses, although he had so great a
    preceptor. And in examining their actions and lives one cannot see
    that they owed anything to fortune beyond opportunity, which brought
    them the material to mould into the form which seemed best to them.
    Without that opportunity their powers of mind would have been
    extinguished, and without those powers the opportunity would have come
    in vain.

    It was necessary, therefore, to Moses that he should find the people
    of Israel in Egypt enslaved and oppressed by the Egyptians, in order
    that they should be disposed to follow him so as to be delivered out
    of bondage. It was necessary that Romulus should not remain in Alba,
    and that he should be abandoned at his birth, in order that he should
    become King of Rome and founder of the fatherland. It was necessary
    that Cyrus should find the Persians discontented with the government
    of the Medes, and the Medes soft and effeminate through their long
    peace. Theseus could not have shown his ability had he not found the
    Athenians dispersed. These opportunities, therefore, made those men
    fortunate, and their high ability enabled them to recognize the
    opportunity whereby their country was ennobled and made famous.

    Those who by valorous ways become princes, like these men, acquire a
    principality with difficulty, but they keep it with ease. The
    difficulties they have in acquiring it rise in part from the new rules
    and methods which they are forced to introduce to establish their
    government and its security. And it ought to be remembered that there
    is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct,
    or more uncertain in its success, then to take the lead in the
    introduction of a new order of things. Because the innovator has for
    enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and
    lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new. This
    coolness arises partly from fear of the opponents, who have the laws
    on their side, and partly from the incredulity of men, who do not
    readily believe in new things until they have had a long experience of
    them. Thus it happens that whenever those who are hostile have the
    opportunity to attack they do it like partisans, whilst the others
    defend lukewarmly, in such wise that the prince is endangered along
    with them.

    It is necessary, therefore, if we desire to discuss this matter
    thoroughly, to inquire whether these innovators can rely on themselves
    or have to depend on others: that is to say, whether, to consummate
    their enterprise, have they to use prayers or can they use force? In
    the first instance they always succeed badly, and never compass
    anything; but when they can rely on themselves and use force, then
    they are rarely endangered. Hence it is that all armed prophets have
    conquered, and the unarmed ones have been destroyed. Besides the
    reasons mentioned, the nature of the people is variable, and whilst it
    is easy to persuade them, it is difficult to fix them in that
    persuasion. And thus it is necessary to take such measures that, when
    they believe no longer, it may be possible to make them believe by
    force.

    If Moses, Cyrus, Theseus, and Romulus had been unarmed they could not
    have enforced their constitutions for long--as happened in our time to
    Fra Girolamo Savonarola, who was ruined with his new order of things
    immediately the multitude believed in him no longer, and he had no
    means of keeping steadfast those who believed or of making the
    unbelievers to believe. Therefore such as these have great
    difficulties in consummating their enterprise, for all their dangers
    are in the ascent, yet with ability they will overcome them; but when
    these are overcome, and those who envied them their success are
    exterminated, they will begin to be respected, and they will continue
    afterwards powerful, secure, honoured, and happy.

    To these great examples I wish to add a lesser one; still it bears
    some resemblance to them, and I wish it to suffice me for all of a
    like kind: it is Hiero the Syracusan.[*] This man rose from a private
    station to be Prince of Syracuse, nor did he, either, owe anything to
    fortune but opportunity; for the Syracusans, being oppressed, chose
    him for their captain, afterwards he was rewarded by being made their
    prince. He was of so great ability, even as a private citizen, that
    one who writes of him says he wanted nothing but a kingdom to be a
    king. This man abolished the old soldiery, organized the new, gave up
    old alliances, made new ones; and as he had his own soldiers and
    allies, on such foundations he was able to build any edifice: thus,
    whilst he had endured much trouble in acquiring, he had but little in
    keeping.

    [*] Hiero II, born about 307 B.C., died 216 B.C.

    CHAPTER VII

    CONCERNING NEW PRINCIPALITIES WHICH ARE ACQUIRED EITHER
    BY THE ARMS OF OTHERS OR BY GOOD FORTUNE

    Those who solely by good fortune become princes from being private
    citizens have little trouble in rising, but much in keeping atop; they
    have not any difficulties on the way up, because they fly, but they
    have many when they reach the summit. Such are those to whom some
    state is given either for money or by the favour of him who bestows
    it; as happened to many in Greece, in the cities of Ionia and of the
    Hellespont, where princes were made by Darius, in order that they
    might hold the cities both for his security and his glory; as also
    were those emperors who, by the corruption of the soldiers, from being
    citizens came to empire. Such stand simply elevated upon the goodwill
    and the fortune of him who has elevated them--two most inconstant and
    unstable things. Neither have they the knowledge requisite for the
    position; because, unless they are men of great worth and ability, it
    is not reasonable to expect that they should know how to command,
    having always lived in a private condition; besides, they cannot hold
    it because they have not forces which they can keep friendly and
    faithful.

    States that rise unexpectedly, then, like all other things in nature
    which are born and grow rapidly, cannot leave their foundations and
    correspondencies[*] fixed in such a way that the first storm will not
    overthrow them; unless, as is said, those who unexpectedly become
    princes are men of so much ability that they know they have to be
    prepared at once to hold that which fortune has thrown into their
    laps, and that those foundations, which others have laid BEFORE they
    became princes, they must lay AFTERWARDS.

    [*] "Le radici e corrispondenze," their roots (i.e. foundations) and
    correspondencies or relations with other states--a common meaning
    of "correspondence" and "correspondency" in the sixteenth and
    seventeenth centuries.

    Concerning these two methods of rising to be a prince by ability or
    fortune, I wish to adduce two examples within our own recollection,
    and these are Francesco Sforza[*] and Cesare Borgia. Francesco, by
    proper means and with great ability, from being a private person rose
    to be Duke of Milan, and that which he had acquired with a thousand
    anxieties he kept with little trouble. On the other hand, Cesare
    Borgia, called by the people Duke Valentino, acquired his state during
    the ascendancy of his father, and on its decline he lost it,
    notwithstanding that he had taken every measure and done all that
    ought to be done by a wise and able man to fix firmly his roots in the
    states which the arms and fortunes of others had bestowed on him.

    [*] Francesco Sforza, born 1401, died 1466. He married Bianca Maria
    Visconti, a natural daughter of Filippo Visconti, the Duke of
    Milan, on whose death he procured his own elevation to the duchy.
    Machiavelli was the accredited agent of the Florentine Republic to
    Cesare Borgia (1478-1507) during the transactions which led up to
    the assassinations of the Orsini and Vitelli at Sinigalia, and
    along with his letters to his chiefs in Florence he has left an
    account, written ten years before "The Prince," of the proceedings
    of the duke in his "Descritione del modo tenuto dal duca Valentino
    nello ammazzare Vitellozzo Vitelli," etc., a translation of which
    is appended to the present work.

    Because, as is stated above, he who has not first laid his foundations
    may be able with great ability to lay them afterwards, but they will
    be laid with trouble to the architect and danger to the building. If,
    therefore, all the steps taken by the duke be considered, it will be
    seen that he laid solid foundations for his future power, and I do not
    consider it superfluous to discuss them, because I do not know what
    better precepts to give a new prince than the example of his actions;
    and if his dispositions were of no avail, that was not his fault, but
    the extraordinary and extreme malignity of fortune.

    Alexander the Sixth, in wishing to aggrandize the duke, his son, had
    many immediate and prospective difficulties. Firstly, he did not see
    his way to make him master of any state that was not a state of the
    Church; and if he was willing to rob the Church he knew that the Duke
    of Milan and the Venetians would not consent, because Faenza and
    Rimini were already under the protection of the Venetians. Besides
    this, he saw the arms of Italy, especially those by which he might
    have been assisted, in hands that would fear the aggrandizement of the
    Pope, namely, the Orsini and the Colonnesi and their following. It
    behoved him, therefore, to upset this state of affairs and embroil the
    powers, so as to make himself securely master of part of their states.
    This was easy for him to do, because he found the Venetians, moved by
    other reasons, inclined to bring back the French into Italy; he would
    not only not oppose this, but he would render it more easy by
    dissolving the former marriage of King Louis. Therefore the king came
    into Italy with the assistance of the Venetians and the consent of
    Alexander. He was no sooner in Milan than the Pope had soldiers from
    him for the attempt on the Romagna, which yielded to him on the
    reputation of the king. The duke, therefore, having acquired the
    Romagna and beaten the Colonnesi, while wishing to hold that and to
    advance further, was hindered by two things: the one, his forces did
    not appear loyal to him, the other, the goodwill of France: that is to
    say, he feared that the forces of the Orsini, which he was using,
    would not stand to him, that not only might they hinder him from
    winning more, but might themselves seize what he had won, and that the
    king might also do the same. Of the Orsini he had a warning when,
    after taking Faenza and attacking Bologna, he saw them go very
    unwillingly to that attack. And as to the king, he learned his mind
    when he himself, after taking the Duchy of Urbino, attacked Tuscany,
    and the king made him desist from that undertaking; hence the duke
    decided to depend no more upon the arms and the luck of others.

    For the first thing he weakened the Orsini and Colonnesi parties in
    Rome, by gaining to himself all their adherents who were gentlemen,
    making them his gentlemen, giving them good pay, and, according to
    their rank, honouring them with office and command in such a way that
    in a few months all attachment to the factions was destroyed and
    turned entirely to the duke. After this he awaited an opportunity to
    crush the Orsini, having scattered the adherents of the Colonna house.
    This came to him soon and he used it well; for the Orsini, perceiving
    at length that the aggrandizement of the duke and the Church was ruin
    to them, called a meeting of the Magione in Perugia. From this sprung
    the rebellion at Urbino and the tumults in the Romagna, with endless
    dangers to the duke, all of which he overcame with the help of the
    French. Having restored his authority, not to leave it at risk by
    trusting either to the French or other outside forces, he had recourse
    to his wiles, and he knew so well how to conceal his mind that, by the
    mediation of Signor Pagolo--whom the duke did not fail to secure with
    all kinds of attention, giving him money, apparel, and horses--the
    Orsini were reconciled, so that their simplicity brought them into his
    power at Sinigalia.[*] Having exterminated the leaders, and turned
    their partisans into his friends, the duke laid sufficiently good
    foundations to his power, having all the Romagna and the Duchy of
    Urbino; and the people now beginning to appreciate their prosperity,
    he gained them all over to himself. And as this point is worthy of
    notice, and to be imitated by others, I am not willing to leave it
    out.

  290. damn, this really sucks everything there is to... by Chooker · · Score: 1

    ... that you don't really want to suck, cos it aint that fun.

    We lose our fantastic fuckin journalist (the aussie camera man) through taliban executions, and yet the powers that be allow wankers like this arse puncher to go around and print fuckin propaganda crap? Has this person ever been outside, let alone in another country to actually see what the fucks goin on out here?

    JESUS FUCKING CHRIST!! JUST KILL HIM ALREADY!

    --

    --
    "I feel so cold, on hookers and gin... this mess we're in"
  291. Simple request by Raunchola · · Score: 3

    Post the e-mail this guy sent you. Feel free to conceal his real name and e-mail address if you see fit. But post the e-mail, with full headers, so we can see that you're not pulling this all out of thin air.

    --

    --
    The real Raunchola isn't cool enough to have any imposters
  292. Re:damn, this really sucks everything there is to. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say, therefore, that in entirely new principalities, where there is
    a new prince, more or less difficulty is found in keeping them,
    accordingly as there is more or less ability in him who has acquired
    the state. Now, as the fact of becoming a prince from a private
    station presupposes either ability or fortune, it is clear that one or
    other of these things will mitigate in some degree many difficulties.
    Nevertheless, he who has relied least on fortune is established the
    strongest. Further, it facilitates matters when the prince, having no
    other state, is compelled to reside there in person.

    But to come to those who, by their own ability and not through
    fortune, have risen to be princes, I say that Moses, Cyrus, Romulus,
    Theseus, and such like are the most excellent examples. And although
    one may not discuss Moses, he having been a mere executor of the will
    of God, yet he ought to be admired, if only for that favour which made
    him worthy to speak with God. But in considering Cyrus and others who
    have acquired or founded kingdoms, all will be found admirable; and if
    their particular deeds and conduct shall be considered, they will not
    be found inferior to those of Moses, although he had so great a
    preceptor. And in examining their actions and lives one cannot see
    that they owed anything to fortune beyond opportunity, which brought
    them the material to mould into the form which seemed best to them.
    Without that opportunity their powers of mind would have been
    extinguished, and without those powers the opportunity would have come
    in vain.

    It was necessary, therefore, to Moses that he should find the people
    of Israel in Egypt enslaved and oppressed by the Egyptians, in order
    that they should be disposed to follow him so as to be delivered out
    of bondage. It was necessary that Romulus should not remain in Alba,
    and that he should be abandoned at his birth, in order that he should
    become King of Rome and founder of the fatherland. It was necessary
    that Cyrus should find the Persians discontented with the government
    of the Medes, and the Medes soft and effeminate through their long
    peace. Theseus could not have shown his ability had he not found the
    Athenians dispersed. These opportunities, therefore, made those men
    fortunate, and their high ability enabled them to recognize the
    opportunity whereby their country was ennobled and made famous.

    Those who by valorous ways become princes, like these men, acquire a
    principality with difficulty, but they keep it with ease. The
    difficulties they have in acquiring it rise in part from the new rules
    and methods which they are forced to introduce to establish their
    government and its security. And it ought to be remembered that there
    is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct,
    or more uncertain in its success, then to take the lead in the
    introduction.

  293. Yes Give it to me baby by RotateLeft4Bits · · Score: 0

    Give me more of that Propaganda yes, It feels so good, so can it really be wrong.

    --
    I'm not a Troll i prefer to be called a Goblin.
    1. Re:Yes Give it to me baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the death of Pius III, in 1503, Machiavelli was sent to Rome to
      watch the election of his successor, and there he saw Cesare Borgia
      cheated into allowing the choice of the College to fall on Giuliano
      delle Rovere (Julius II), who was one of the cardinals that had most
      reason to fear the duke. Machiavelli, when commenting on this
      election, says that he who thinks new favours will cause great
      personages to forget old injuries deceives himself. Julius did not
      rest until he had ruined Cesare.

      It was to Julius II that Machiavelli was sent in 1506, when that
      pontiff was commencing his enterprise against Bologna; which he
      brought to a successful issue, as he did many of his other adventures,
      owing chiefly to his impetuous character. It is in reference to Pope
      Julius that Machiavelli moralizes on the resemblance between Fortune
      and women, and concludes that it is the bold rather than the cautious
      man that will win and hold them both.

      It is impossible to follow here the varying fortunes of the Italian
      states, which in 1507 were controlled by France, Spain, and Germany,
      with results that have lasted to our day; we are concerned with those
      events, and with the three great actors in them, so far only as they
      impinge on the personality of Machiavelli. He had several meetings
      with Louis XII of France, and his estimate of that monarch's character
      has already been alluded to. Machiavelli has painted Ferdinand of
      Aragon as the man who accomplished great things under the cloak of
      religion, but who in reality had no mercy, faith, humanity, or
      integrity; and who, had he allowed himself to be influenced by such
      motives, would have been ruined. The Emperor Maximilian was one of the
      most interesting men of the age, and his character has been drawn by
      many hands; but Machiavelli, who was an envoy at his court in 1507-8,
      reveals the secret of his many failures when he describes him as a
      secretive man, without force of character--ignoring the human agencies
      necessary to carry his schemes into effect, and never insisting on the
      fulfilment of his wishes.

      The remaining years of Machiavelli's official career were filled with
      events arising out of the League of Cambrai, made in 1508 between the
      three great European powers already mentioned and the pope, with the
      object of crushing the Venetian Republic. This result was attained in
      the battle of Vaila, when Venice lost in one day all that she had won
      in eight hundred years. Florence had a difficult part to play during
      these events, complicated as they were by the feud which broke out
      between the pope and the French, because friendship with France had
      dictated the entire policy of the Republic. When, in 1511, Julius II
      finally formed the Holy League against France, and with the assistance
      of the Swiss drove the French out of Italy, Florence lay at the mercy
      of the Pope, and had to submit to his terms, one of which was that the
      Medici should be restored. The return of the Medici to Florence on 1st
      September 1512, and the consequent fall of the Republic, was the
      signal for the dismissal of Machiavelli and his friends, and thus put
      an end to his public career, for, as we have seen, he died without
      regaining office.

      LITERATURE AND DEATH
      Aet. 43-58--1512-27

      On the return of the Medici, Machiavelli, who for a few weeks had
      vainly hoped to retain his office under the new masters of Florence,
      was dismissed by decree dated 7th November 1512. Shortly after this he
      was accused of complicity in an abortive conspiracy against the
      Medici, imprisoned, and put to the question by torture. The new
      Medicean people, Leo X, procured his release, and he retired to his
      small property at San Casciano, near Florence, where he devoted
      himself to literature. In a letter to Francesco Vettori, dated 13th
      December 1513, he has left a very interesting description of his life
      at this period, which elucidates his methods and his motives in
      writing "The Prince." After describing his daily occupations with his
      family and neighbours, he writes: "The evening being come, I return
      home and go to my study; at the entrance I pull off my peasant-
      clothes, covered with dust and dirt, and put on my noble court dress,
      and thus becomingly re-clothed I pass into the ancient courts of the
      men of old, where, being lovingly received by them, I am fed with that
      food which is mine alone; where I do not hesitate to speak with them,
      and to ask for the reason of their actions, and they in their
      benignity answer me; and for four hours I feel no weariness, I forget
      every trouble, poverty does not dismay, death does not terrify me; I
      am possessed entirely by those great men. And because Dante says:

      Knowledge doth come of learning well retained,
      Unfruitful else,

      I have noted down what I have gained from their conversation, and have
      composed a small work on 'Principalities,' where I pour myself out as
      fully as I can in meditation on the subject, discussing what a
      principality is, what kinds there are, how they can be acquired, how
      they can be kept, why they are lost: and if any of my fancies ever
      pleased you, this ought not to displease you: and to a prince,
      especially to a new one, it should be welcome: therefore I dedicate it
      to his Magnificence Giuliano. Filippo Casavecchio has seen it; he will
      be able to tell you what is in it, and of the discourses I have had
      with him; nevertheless, I am still enriching and polishing it."

      The "little book" suffered many vicissitudes before attaining the form
      in which it has reached us. Various mental influences were at work
      during its composition; its title and patron were changed; and for
      some unknown reason it was finally dedicated to Lorenzo de' Medici.
      Although Machiavelli discussed with Casavecchio whether it should be
      sent or presented in person to the patron, there is no evidence that
      Lorenzo ever received or even read it: he certainly never gave
      Machiavelli any employment. Although it was plagiarized during
      Machiavelli's lifetime, "The Prince" was never published by him, and
      its text is still disputable.

      Machiavelli concludes his letter to Vettori thus: "And as to this
      little thing [his book], when it has been read it will be seen that
      during the fifteen years I have given to the study of statecraft I
      have neither slept nor idled; and men ought ever to desire to be
      served by one who has reaped experience at the expense of others. And
      of my loyalty none could doubt, because having always kept faith I
      could not now learn how to break it; for he who has been faithful and
      honest, as I have, cannot change his nature; and my poverty is a
      witness to my honesty."

      Before Machiavelli had got "The Prince" off his hands he commenced his
      "Discourse on the First Decade of Titus Livius," which should be read
      concurrently with "The Prince." These and several minor works occupied
      him until the year 1518, when he accepted a small commission to look
      after the affairs of some Florentine merchants at Genoa. In 1519 the
      Medicean rulers of Florence granted a few political concessions to her
      citizens, and Machiavelli with others was consulted upon a new
      constitution under which the Great Council was to be restored; but on
      one pretext or another it was not promulgated.

      In 1520 the Florentine merchants again had recourse to Machiavelli to
      settle their difficulties with Lucca, but this year was chiefly
      remarkable for his re-entry into Florentine literary society, where he
      was much sought after, and also for the production of his "Art of
      War." It was in the same year that he received a commission at the
      instance of Cardinal de' Medici to write the "History of Florence," a
      task which occupied him until 1525. His return to popular favour may
      have determined the Medici to give him this employment, for an old
      writer observes that "an able statesman out of work, like a huge
      whale, will endeavour to overturn the ship unless he has an empty cask
      to play with."

      When the "History of Florence" was finished, Machiavelli took it to
      Rome for presentation to his patron, Giuliano de' Medici, who had in
      the meanwhile become pope under the title of Clement VII. It is
      somewhat remarkable that, as, in 1513, Machiavelli had written "The
      Prince" for the instruction of the Medici after they had just regained
      power in Florence, so, in 1525, he dedicated the "History of Florence"
      to the head of the family when its ruin was now at hand. In that year
      the battle of Pavia destroyed the French rule in Italy, and left
      Francis I a prisoner in the hands of his great rival, Charles V. This
      was followed by the sack of Rome, upon the news of which the popular
      party at Florence threw off the yoke of the Medici, who were once more
      banished.

      Machiavelli was absent from Florence at this time, but hastened his
      return, hoping to secure his former office of secretary to the "Ten of
      Liberty and Peace." Unhappily he was taken ill soon after he reached
      Florence, where he died on 22nd June 1527.

      THE MAN AND HIS WORKS

      No one can say where the bones of Machiavelli rest, but modern
      Florence has decreed him a stately cenotaph in Santa Croce, by the
      side of her most famous sons; recognizing that, whatever other nations
      may have found in his works, Italy found in them the idea of her unity
      and the germs of her renaissance among the nations of Europe. Whilst
      it is idle to protest against the world-wide and evil signification of
      his name, it may be pointed out that the harsh construction of his
      doctrine which this sinister reputation implies was unknown to his own
      day, and that the researches of recent times have enabled us to
      interpret him more reasonably. It is due to these inquiries that the
      shape of an "unholy necromancer," which so long haunted men's vision,
      has begun to fade.

      Machiavelli was undoubtedly a man of great observation, acuteness, and
      industry; noting with appreciative eye whatever passed before him, and
      with his supreme literary gift turning it to account in his enforced
      retirement from affairs. He does not present himself, nor is he
      depicted by his contemporaries, as a type of that rare combination,
      the successful statesman and author, for he appears to have been only
      moderately prosperous in his several embassies and political
      employments. He was misled by Catherina Sforza, ignored by Louis XII,
      overawed by Cesare Borgia; several of his embassies were quite barren
      of results; his attempts to fortify Florence failed, and the soldiery
      that he raised astonished everybody by their cowardice. In the conduct
      of his own affairs he was timid and time-serving; he dared not appear
      by the side of Soderini, to whom he owed so much, for fear of
      compromising himself; his connection with the Medici was open to
      suspicion, and Giuliano appears to have recognized his real forte when
      he set him to write the "History of Florence," rather than employ him
      in the state. And it is on the literary side of his character, and
      there alone, that we find no weakness and no failure.

      Although the light of almost four centuries has been focused on "The
      Prince," its problems are still debatable and interesting, because
      they are the eternal problems between the ruled and their rulers. Such
      as they are, its ethics are those of Machiavelli's contemporaries; yet
      they cannot be said to be out of date so long as the governments of
      Europe rely on material rather than on moral forces. Its historical
      incidents and personages become interesting by reason of the uses
      which Machiavelli makes of them to illustrate his theories of
      government and conduct.

      Leaving out of consideration those maxims of state which still furnish
      some European and eastern statesmen with principles of action, "The
      Prince" is bestrewn with truths that can be proved at every turn. Men
      are still the dupes of their simplicity and greed, as they were in the
      days of Alexander VI. The cloak of religion still conceals the vices
      which Machiavelli laid bare in the character of Ferdinand of Aragon.
      Men will not look at things as they really are, but as they wish them
      to be--and are ruined. In politics there are no perfectly safe
      courses; prudence consists in choosing the least dangerous ones. Then
      --to pass to a higher plane--Machiavelli reiterates that, although
      crimes may win an empire, they do not win glory. Necessary wars are
      just wars, and the arms of a nation are hallowed when it has no other
      resource but to fight.

      It is the cry of a far later day than Machiavelli's that government
      should be elevated into a living moral force, capable of inspiring the
      people with a just recognition of the fundamental principles of
      society; to this "high argument" "The Prince" contributes but little.
      Machiavelli always refused to write either of men or of governments
      otherwise than as he found them, and he writes with such skill and
      insight that his work is of abiding value. But what invests "The
      Prince" with more than a merely artistic or historical interest is the
      incontrovertible truth that it deals with the great principles which
      still guide nations and rulers in their relationship with each other
      and their neighbours.

      In translating "The Prince" my aim has been to achieve at all costs an
      exact literal rendering of the original, rather than a fluent
      paraphrase adapted to the modern notions of style and expression.
      Machiavelli was no facile phrasemonger; the conditions under which he
      wrote obliged him to weigh every word; his themes were lofty, his
      substance grave, his manner nobly plain and serious. "Quis eo fuit
      unquam in partiundis rebus, in definiendis, in explanandis pressior?"
      In "The Prince," it may be truly said, there is reason assignable, not
      only for every word, but for the position of every word. To an
      Englishman of Shakespeare's time the translation of such a treatise
      was in some ways a comparatively easy task, for in those times the
      genius of the English more nearly resembled that of the Italian
      language; to the Englishman of to-day it is not so simple. To take a
      single example: the word "intrattenere," employed by Machiavelli to
      indicate the policy adopted by the Roman Senate towards the weaker
      states of Greece, would by an Elizabethan be correctly rendered
      "entertain," and every contemporary reader would understand what was
      meant by saying that "Rome entertained the Aetolians and the Achaeans
      without augmenting their power." But to-day such a phrase would seem
      obsolete and ambiguous, if not unmeaning: we are compelled to say that
      "Rome maintained friendly relations with the Aetolians," etc., using
      four words to do the work of one. I have tried to preserve the pithy
      brevity of the Italian so far as was consistent with an absolute
      fidelity to the sense. If the result be an occasional asperity I can
      only hope that the reader, in his eagerness to reach the author's
      meaning, may overlook the roughness of the road that leads him to it.

      The following is a list of the works of Machiavelli:

      Principal works. Discorso sopra le cose di Pisa, 1499; Del modo di
      trattare i popoli della Valdichiana ribellati, 1502; Del modo tenuto
      dal duca Valentino nell' ammazzare Vitellozzo Vitelli, Oliverotto da
      Fermo, etc., 1502; Discorso sopra la provisione del danaro, 1502;
      Decennale primo (poem in terza rima), 1506; Ritratti delle cose dell'
      Alemagna, 1508-12; Decennale secondo, 1509; Ritratti delle cose di
      Francia, 1510; Discorsi sopra la prima deca di T. Livio, 3 vols.,
      1512-17; Il Principe, 1513; Andria, comedy translated from Terence,
      1513 (?); Mandragola, prose comedy in five acts, with prologue in
      verse, 1513; Della lingua (dialogue), 1514; Clizia, comedy in prose,
      1515 (?); Belfagor arcidiavolo (novel), 1515; Asino d'oro (poem in
      terza rima), 1517; Dell' arte della guerra, 1519-20; Discorso sopra il
      riformare lo stato di Firenze, 1520; Sommario delle cose della citta
      di Lucca, 1520; Vita di Castruccio Castracani da Lucca, 1520; Istorie
      fiorentine, 8 books, 1521-5; Frammenti storici, 1525.

      Other poems include Sonetti, Canzoni, Ottave, and Canti
      carnascialeschi.

      Editions. Aldo, Venice, 1546; della Tertina, 1550; Cambiagi, Florence,
      6 vols., 1782-5; dei Classici, Milan, 10 1813; Silvestri, 9 vols.,
      1820-2; Passerini, Fanfani, Milanesi, 6 vols. only published, 1873-7.

      Minor works. Ed. F. L. Polidori, 1852; Lettere familiari, ed. E.
      Alvisi, 1883, 2 editions, one with excisions; Credited Writings, ed.
      G. Canestrini, 1857; Letters to F. Vettori, see A. Ridolfi, Pensieri
      intorno allo scopo di N. Machiavelli nel libro Il Principe, etc.; D.
      Ferrara, The Private Correspondence of Nicolo Machiavelli, 1929.

      DEDICATION

      To the Magnificent Lorenzo Di Piero De' Medici:

      Those who strive to obtain the good graces of a prince are
      accustomed to come before him with such things as they hold most
      precious, or in which they see him take most delight; whence one
      often sees horses, arms, cloth of gold, precious stones, and
      similar ornaments presented to princes, worthy of their greatness.

      Desiring therefore to present myself to your Magnificence with
      some testimony of my devotion towards you, I have not found among
      my possessions anything which I hold more dear than, or value so
      much as, the knowledge of the actions of great men, acquired by
      long experience in contemporary affairs, and a continual study of
      antiquity; which, having reflected upon it with great and
      prolonged diligence, I now send, digested into a little volume, to
      your Magnificence.

      And although I may consider this work unworthy of your
      countenance, nevertheless I trust much to your benignity that it
      may be acceptable, seeing that it is not possible for me to make a
      better gift than to offer you the opportunity of understanding in
      the shortest time all that I have learnt in so many years, and
      with so many troubles and dangers; which work I have not
      embellished with swelling or magnificent words, nor stuffed with
      rounded periods, nor with any extrinsic allurements or adornments
      whatever, with which so many are accustomed to embellish their
      works; for I have wished either that no honour should be given it,
      or else that the truth of the matter and the weightiness of the
      theme shall make it acceptable.

      Nor do I hold with those who regard it as a presumption if a man
      of low and humble condition dare to discuss and settle the
      concerns of princes; because, just as those who draw landscapes
      place themselves below in the plain to contemplate the nature of
      the mountains and of lofty places, and in order to contemplate the
      plains place themselves upon high mountains, even so to understand
      the nature of the people it needs to be a prince, and to
      understand that if princes it needs to be of the people.

      Take then, your Magnificence, this little gift in the spirit in
      which I send it; wherein, if it be diligently read and considered
      by you, you will learn my extreme desire that you should attain
      that greatness which fortune and your other attributes promise.
      And if your Magnificence from the summit of your greatness will
      sometimes turn your eyes to these lower regions, you will see how
      unmeritedly I suffer a great and continued malignity of fortune.

      THE PRINCE

      CHAPTER I

      HOW MANY KINDS OF PRINCIPALITIES THERE ARE,
      AND BY WHAT MEANS THEY ARE ACQUIRED

      All states, all powers, that have held and hold rule over men have
      been and are either republics or principalities.

      Principalities are either hereditary, in which the family has been
      long established; or they are new.

      The new are either entirely new, as was Milan to Francesco Sforza, or
      they are, as it were, members annexed to the hereditary state of the
      prince who has acquired them, as was the kingdom of Naples to that of
      the King of Spain.

      Such dominions thus acquired are either accustomed to live under a
      prince, or to live in freedom; and are acquired either by the arms of
      the prince himself, or of others, or else by fortune or by ability.

      CHAPTER II

      CONCERNING HEREDITARY PRINCIPALITIES

      I will leave out all discussion on republics, inasmuch as in another
      place I have written of them at length, and will address myself only
      to principalities. In doing so I will keep to the order indicated
      above, and discuss how such principalities are to be ruled and
      preserved.

      I say at once there are fewer difficulties in holding hereditary
      states, and those long accustomed to the family of their prince, than
      new ones; for it is sufficient only not to transgress the customs of
      his ancestors, and to deal prudently with circumstances as they arise,
      for a prince of average powers to maintain himself in his state,
      unless he be deprived of it by some extraordinary and excessive force;
      and if he should be so deprived of it, whenever anything sinister
      happens to the usurper, he will regain it.

      We have in Italy, for example, the Duke of Ferrara, who could not have
      withstood the attacks of the Venetians in '84, nor those of Pope
      Julius in '10, unless he had been long established in his dominions.
      For the hereditary prince has less cause and less necessity to offend;
      hence it happens that he will be more loved; and unless extraordinary
      vices cause him to be hated, it is reasonable to expect that his
      subjects will be naturally well disposed towards him; and in the
      antiquity and duration of his rule the memories and motives that make
      for change are lost, for one change always leaves the toothing for
      another.

      CHAPTER III

      CONCERNING MIXED PRINCIPALITIES

      But the difficulties occur in a new principality. And firstly, if it
      be not entirely new, but is, as it were, a member of a state which,
      taken collectively, may be called composite, the changes arise chiefly
      from an inherent difficulty which there is in all new principalities;
      for men change their rulers willingly, hoping to better themselves,
      and this hope induces them to take up arms against him who rules:
      wherein they are deceived, because they afterwards find by experience
      they have gone from bad to worse. This follows also on another natural
      and common necessity, which always causes a new prince to burden those
      who have submitted to him with his soldiery and with infinite other
      hardships which he must put upon his new acquisition.

      In this way you have enemies in all those whom you have injured in
      seizing that principality, and you are not able to keep those friends
      who put you there because of your not being able to satisfy them in
      the way they expected, and you cannot take strong measures against
      them, feeling bound to them. For, although one may be very strong in
      armed forces, yet in entering a province one has always need of the
      goodwill of the natives.

      For these reasons Louis the Twelfth, King of France, quickly occupied
      Milan, and as quickly lost it; and to turn him out the first time it
      only needed Lodovico's own forces; because those who had opened the
      gates to him, finding themselves deceived in their hopes of future
      benefit, would not endure the ill-treatment of the new prince. It is
      very true that, after acquiring rebellious provinces a second time,
      they are not so lightly lost afterwards, because the prince, with
      little reluctance, takes the opportunity of the rebellion to punish
      the delinquents, to clear out the suspects, and to strengthen himself
      in the weakest places. Thus to cause France to lose Milan the first
      time it was enough for the Duke Lodovico[*] to raise insurrections on
      the borders; but to cause him to lose it a second time it was
      necessary to bring the whole world against him, and that his armies
      should be defeated and driven out of Italy; which followed from the
      causes above mentioned.

    2. Re:Yes Give it to me baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, the prince who holds a country differing in the above respects
      ought to make himself the head and defender of his less powerful
      neighbours, and to weaken the more powerful amongst them, taking care
      that no foreigner as powerful as himself shall, by any accident, get a
      footing there; for it will always happen that such a one will be
      introduced by those who are discontented, either through excess of
      ambition or through fear, as one has seen already. The Romans were
      brought into Greece by the Aetolians; and in every other country where
      they obtained a footing they were brought in by the inhabitants. And
      the usual course of affairs is that, as soon as a powerful foreigner
      enters a country, all the subject states are drawn to him, moved by
      the hatred which they feel against the ruling power. So that in
      respect to those subject states he has not to take any trouble to gain
      them over to himself, for the whole of them quickly rally to the state
      which he has acquired there. He has only to take care that they do not
      get hold of too much power and too much authority, and then with his
      own forces, and with their goodwill, he can easily keep down the more
      powerful of them, so as to remain entirely master in the country. And
      he who does not properly manage this business will soon lose what he
      has acquired, and whilst he does hold it he will have endless
      difficulties and troubles.

      The Romans, in the countries which they annexed, observed closely
      these measures; they sent colonies and maintained friendly relations
      with[*] the minor powers, without increasing their strength; they kept
      down the greater, and did not allow any strong foreign powers to gain
      authority. Greece appears to me sufficient for an example. The
      Achaeans and Aetolians were kept friendly by them, the kingdom of
      Macedonia was humbled, Antiochus was driven out; yet the merits of the
      Achaeans and Aetolians never secured for them permission to increase
      their power, nor did the persuasions of Philip ever induce the Romans
      to be his friends without first humbling him, nor did the influence of
      Antiochus make them agree that he should retain any lordship over the
      country. Because the Romans did in these instances what all prudent
      princes ought to do, who have to regard not only present troubles, but
      also future ones, for which they must prepare with every energy,
      because, when foreseen, it is easy to remedy them; but if you wait
      until they approach, the medicine is no longer in time because the
      malady has become incurable; for it happens in this, as the physicians
      say it happens in hectic fever, that in the beginning of the malady it
      is easy to cure but difficult to detect, but in the course of time,
      not having been either detected or treated in the beginning, it
      becomes easy to detect but difficult to cure. This it happens in
      affairs of state, for when the evils that arise have been foreseen
      (which it is only given to a wise man to see), they can be quickly
      redressed, but when, through not having been foreseen, they have been
      permitted to grow in a way that every one can see them, there is no
      longer a remedy. Therefore, the Romans, foreseeing troubles, dealt
      with them at once, and, even to avoid a war, would not let them come
      to a head, for they knew that war is not to be avoided, but is only to
      be put off to the advantage of others; moreover they wished to fight
      with Philip and Antiochus in Greece so as not to have to do it in
      Italy; they could have avoided both, but this they did not wish; nor
      did that ever please them which is for ever in the mouths of the wise
      ones of our time:--Let us enjoy the benefits of the time--but rather
      the benefits of their own valour and prudence, for time drives
      everything before it, and is able to bring with it good as well as
      evil, and evil as well as good.

      [*] See remark in the introduction on the word "intrattenere."

      But let us turn to France and inquire whether she has done any of the
      things mentioned. I will speak of Louis[*] (and not of Charles[+]) as
      the one whose conduct is the better to be observed, he having held
      possession of Italy for the longest period; and you will see that he
      has done the opposite to those things which ought to be done to retain
      a state composed of divers elements.

      [*] Louis XII, King of France, "The Father of the People," born 1462,
      died 1515.

      [+] Charles VIII, King of France, born 1470, died 1498.

      King Louis was brought into Italy by the ambition of the Venetians,
      who desired to obtain half the state of Lombardy by his intervention.
      I will not blame the course taken by the king, because, wishing to get
      a foothold in Italy, and having no friends there--seeing rather that
      every door was shut to him owing to the conduct of Charles--he was
      forced to accept those friendships which he could get, and he would
      have succeeded very quickly in his design if in other matters he had
      not made some mistakes. The king, however, having acquired Lombardy,
      regained at once the authority which Charles had lost: Genoa yielded;
      the Florentines became his friends; the Marquess of Mantua, the Duke
      of Ferrara, the Bentivogli, my lady of Forli, the Lords of Faenza, of
      Pesaro, of Rimini, of Camerino, of Piombino, the Lucchese, the Pisans,
      the Sienese--everybody made advances to him to become his friend. Then
      could the Venetians realize the rashness of the course taken by them,
      which, in order that they might secure two towns in Lombardy, had made
      the king master of two-thirds of Italy.

      Let any one now consider with that little difficulty the king could
      have maintained his position in Italy had he observed the rules above
      laid down, and kept all his friends secure and protected; for although
      they were numerous they were both weak and timid, some afraid of the
      Church, some of the Venetians, and thus they would always have been
      forced to stand in with him, and by their means he could easily have
      made himself secure against those who remained powerful. But he was no
      sooner in Milan than he did the contrary by assisting Pope Alexander
      to occupy the Romagna. It never occurred to him that by this action he
      was weakening himself, depriving himself of friends and of those who
      had thrown themselves into his lap, whilst he aggrandized the Church
      by adding much temporal power to the spiritual, thus giving it greater
      authority. And having committed this prime error, he was obliged to
      follow it up, so much so that, to put an end to the ambition of
      Alexander, and to prevent his becoming the master of Tuscany, he was
      himself forced to come into Italy.

      And as if it were not enough to have aggrandized the Church, and
      deprived himself of friends, he, wishing to have the kingdom of
      Naples, divides it with the King of Spain, and where he was the prime
      arbiter in Italy he takes an associate, so that the ambitious of that
      country and the malcontents of his own should have somewhere to
      shelter; and whereas he could have left in the kingdom his own
      pensioner as king, he drove him out, to put one there who was able to
      drive him, Louis, out in turn.

      The wish to acquire is in truth very natural and common, and men
      always do so when they can, and for this they will be praised not
      blamed; but when they cannot do so, yet wish to do so by any means,
      then there is folly and blame. Therefore, if France could have
      attacked Naples with her own forces she ought to have done so; if she
      could not, then she ought not to have divided it. And if the partition
      which she made with the Venetians in Lombardy was justified by the
      excuse that by it she got a foothold in Italy, this other partition
      merited blame, for it had not the excuse of that necessity.

      Therefore Louis made these five errors: he destroyed the minor powers,
      he increased the strength of one of the greater powers in Italy, he
      brought in a foreign power, he did not settle in the country, he did
      not send colonies. Which errors, had he lived, were not enough to
      injure him had he not made a sixth by taking away their dominions from
      the Venetians; because, had he not aggrandized the Church, nor brought
      Spain into Italy, it would have been very reasonable and necessary to
      humble them; but having first taken these steps, he ought never to
      have consented to their ruin, for they, being powerful, would always
      have kept off others from designs on Lombardy, to which the Venetians
      would never have consented except to become masters themselves there;
      also because the others would not wish to take Lombardy from France in
      order to give it to the Venetians, and to run counter to both they
      would not have had the courage.

      And if any one should say: "King Louis yielded the Romagna to
      Alexander and the kingdom to Spain to avoid war, I answer for the
      reasons given above that a blunder ought never to be perpetrated to
      avoid war, because it is not to be avoided, but is only deferred to
      your disadvantage. And if another should allege the pledge which the
      king had given to the Pope that he would assist him in the enterprise,
      in exchange for the dissolution of his marriage[*] and for the cap to
      Rouen,[+] to that I reply what I shall write later on concerning the
      faith of princes, and how it ought to be kept.

      [*] Louis XII divorced his wife, Jeanne, daughter of Louis XI, and
      married in 1499 Anne of Brittany, widow of Charles VIII, in order
      to retain the Duchy of Brittany for the crown.

      [+] The Archbishop of Rouen. He was Georges d'Amboise, created a
      cardinal by Alexander VI. Born 1460, died 1510.

      Thus King Louis lost Lombardy by not having followed any of the
      conditions observed by those who have taken possession of countries
      and wished to retain them. Nor is there any miracle in this, but much
      that is reasonable and quite natural. And on these matters I spoke at
      Nantes with Rouen, when Valentino, as Cesare Borgia, the son of Pope
      Alexander, was usually called, occupied the Romagna, and on Cardinal
      Rouen observing to me that the Italians did not understand war, I
      replied to him that the French did not understand statecraft, meaning
      that otherwise they would not have allowed the Church to reach such
      greatness. And in fact is has been seen that the greatness of the
      Church and of Spain in Italy has been caused by France, and her ruin
      may be attributed to them. From this a general rule is drawn which
      never or rarely fails: that he who is the cause of another becoming
      powerful is ruined; because that predominancy has been brought about
      either by astuteness or else by force, and both are distrusted by him
      who has been raised to power.

      CHAPTER IV

      WHY THE KINGDOM OF DARIUS, CONQUERED BY ALEXANDER, DID NOT REBEL
      AGAINST THE SUCCESSORS OF ALEXANDER AT HIS DEATH

      Considering the difficulties which men have had to hold to a newly
      acquired state, some might wonder how, seeing that Alexander the Great
      became the master of Asia in a few years, and died whilst it was
      scarcely settled (whence it might appear reasonable that the whole
      empire would have rebelled), nevertheless his successors maintained
      themselves, and had to meet no other difficulty than that which arose
      among themselves from their own ambitions.

      I answer that the principalities of which one has record are found to
      be governed in two different ways; either by a prince, with a body of
      servants, who assist him to govern the kingdom as ministers by his
      favour and permission; or by a prince and barons, who hold that
      dignity by antiquity of blood and not by the grace of the prince. Such
      barons have states and their own subjects, who recognize them as lords
      and hold them in natural affection. Those states that are governed by
      a prince and his servants hold their prince in more consideration,
      because in all the country there is no one who is recognized as
      superior to him, and if they yield obedience to another they do it as
      to a minister and official, and they do not bear him any particular
      affection.

      The examples of these two governments in our time are the Turk and the
      King of France. The entire monarchy of the Turk is governed by one
      lord, the others are his servants; and, dividing his kingdom into
      sanjaks, he sends there different administrators, and shifts and
      changes them as he chooses. But the King of France is placed in the
      midst of an ancient body of lords, acknowledged by their own subjects,
      and beloved by them; they have their own prerogatives, nor can the
      king take these away except at his peril. Therefore, he who considers
      both of these states will recognize great difficulties in seizing the
      state of the Turk, but, once it is conquered, great ease in holding
      it. The causes of the difficulties in seizing the kingdom of the Turk
      are that the usurper cannot be called in by the princes of the
      kingdom, nor can he hope to be assisted in his designs by the revolt
      of those whom the lord has around him. This arises from the reasons
      given above; for his ministers, being all slaves and bondmen, can only
      be corrupted with great difficulty, and one can expect little
      advantage from them when they have been corrupted, as they cannot
      carry the people with them, for the reasons assigned. Hence, he who
      attacks the Turk must bear in mind that he will find him united, and
      he will have to rely more on his own strength than on the revolt of
      others; but, if once the Turk has been conquered, and routed in the
      field in such a way that he cannot replace his armies, there is
      nothing to fear but the family of this prince, and, this being
      exterminated, there remains no one to fear, the others having no
      credit with the people; and as the conqueror did not rely on them
      before his victory, so he ought not to fear them after it.

      The contrary happens in kingdoms governed like that of France, because
      one can easily enter there by gaining over some baron of the kingdom,
      for one always finds malcontents and such as desire a change. Such
      men, for the reasons given, can open the way into the state and render
      the victory easy; but if you wish to hold it afterwards, you meet with
      infinite difficulties, both from those who have assisted you and from
      those you have crushed. Nor is it enough for you to have exterminated
      the family of the prince, because the lords that remain make
      themselves the heads of fresh movements against you, and as you are
      unable either to satisfy or exterminate them, that state is lost
      whenever time brings the opportunity.

      Now if you will consider what was the nature of the government of
      Darius, you will find it similar to the kingdom of the Turk, and
      therefore it was only necessary for Alexander, first to overthrow him
      in the field, and then to take the country from him. After which
      victory, Darius being killed, the state remained secure to Alexander,
      for the above reasons. And if his successors had been united they
      would have enjoyed it securely and at their ease, for there were no
      tumults raised in the kingdom except those they provoked themselves.

      But it is impossible to hold with such tranquillity states constituted
      like that of France. Hence arose those frequent rebellions against the
      Romans in Spain, France, and Greece, owing to the many principalities
      there were in these states, of which, as long as the memory of them
      endured, the Romans always held an insecure possession; but with the
      power and long continuance of the empire the memory of them passed
      away, and the Romans then became secure possessors. And when fighting
      afterwards amongst themselves, each one was able to attach to himself
      his own parts of the country, according to the authority he had
      assumed there; and the family of the former lord being exterminated,
      none other than the Romans were acknowledged.

      When these things are remembered no one will marvel at the ease with
      which Alexander held the Empire of Asia, or at the difficulties which
      others have had to keep an acquisition, such as Pyrrhus and many more;
      this is not occasioned by the little or abundance of ability in the
      conqueror, but by the want of uniformity in the subject state.

      CHAPTER V

      CONCERNING THE WAY TO GOVERN CITIES OR PRINCIPALITIES WHICH
      LIVED UNDER THEIR OWN LAWS BEFORE THEY WERE ANNEXED

      Whenever those states which have been acquired as stated have been
      accustomed to live under their own laws and in freedom, there are
      three courses for those who wish to hold them: the first is to ruin
      them, the next is to reside there in person, the third is to permit
      them to live under their own laws, drawing a tribute, and establishing
      within it an oligarchy which will keep it friendly to you. Because
      such a government, being created by the prince, knows that it cannot
      stand without his friendship and interest, and does it utmost to
      support him; and therefore he who would keep a city accustomed to
      freedom will hold it more easily by the means of its own citizens than
      in any other way.

      There are, for example, the Spartans and the Romans. The Spartans held
      Athens and Thebes, establishing there an oligarchy, nevertheless they
      lost them. The Romans, in order to hold Capua, Carthage, and Numantia,
      dismantled them, and did not lose them. They wished to hold Greece as
      the Spartans held it, making it free and permitting its laws, and did
      not succeed. So to hold it they were compelled to dismantle many
      cities in the country, for in truth there is no safe way to retain
      them otherwise than by ruining them. And he who becomes master of a
      city accustomed to freedom and does not destroy it, may expect to be
      destroyed by it, for in rebellion it has always the watchword of
      liberty and its ancient privileges as a rallying point, which neither
      time nor benefits will ever cause it to forget. And whatever you may
      do or provide against, they never forget that name or their privileges
      unless they are disunited or dispersed, but at every chance they
      immediately rally to them, as Pisa after the hundred years she had
      been held in bondage by the Florentines.

      But when cities or countries are accustomed to live under a prince,
      and his family is exterminated, they, being on the one hand accustomed
      to obey and on the other hand not having the old prince, cannot agree
      in making one from amongst themselves, and they do not know how to
      govern themselves. For this reason they are very slow to take up arms,
      and a prince can gain them to himself and secure them much more
      easily. But in republics there is more vitality, greater hatred, and
      more desire for vengeance, which will never permit them to allow the
      memory of their former liberty to rest; so that the safest way is to
      destroy them or to reside there.

      CHAPTER VI

      CONCERNING NEW PRINCIPALITIES WHICH ARE ACQUIRED
      BY ONE'S OWN ARMS AND ABILITY

      Let no one be surprised if, in speaking of entirely new principalities
      as I shall do, I adduce the highest examples both of prince and of
      state; because men, walking almost always in paths beaten by others,
      and following by imitation their deeds, are yet unable to keep
      entirely to the ways of others or attain to the power of those they
      imitate. A wise man ought always to follow the paths beaten by great
      men, and to imitate those who have been supreme, so that if his
      ability does not equal theirs, at least it will savour of it. Let him
      act like the clever archers who, designing to hit the mark which yet
      appears too far distant, and knowing the limits to which the strength
      of their bow attains, take aim much higher than the mark, not to reach
      by their strength or arrow to so great a height, but to be able with
      the aid of so high an aim to hit the mark they wish to reach.

      I say, therefore, that in entirely new principalities, where there is
      a new prince, more or less difficulty is found in keeping them,
      accordingly as there is more or less ability in him who has acquired
      the state. Now, as the fact of becoming a prince from a private
      station presupposes either ability or fortune, it is clear that one or
      other of these things will mitigate in some degree many difficulties.
      Nevertheless, he who has relied least on fortune is established the
      strongest. Further, it facilitates matters when the prince, having no
      other state, is compelled to reside there in person.

      But to come to those who, by their own ability and not through
      fortune, have risen to be princes, I say that Moses, Cyrus, Romulus,
      Theseus, and such like are the most excellent examples. And although
      one may not discuss Moses, he having been a mere executor of the will
      of God, yet he ought to be admired, if only for that favour which made
      him worthy to speak with God. But in considering Cyrus and others who
      have acquired or founded kingdoms, all will be found admirable; and if
      their particular deeds and conduct shall be considered, they will not
      be found inferior to those of Moses, although he had so great a
      preceptor. And in examining their actions and lives one cannot see
      that they owed anything to fortune beyond opportunity, which brought
      them the material to mould into the form which seemed best to them.
      Without that opportunity their powers of mind would have been
      extinguished, and without those powers the opportunity would have come
      in vain.

      It was necessary, therefore, to Moses that he should find the people
      of Israel in Egypt enslaved and oppressed by the Egyptians, in order
      that they should be disposed to follow him so as to be delivered out
      of bondage. It was necessary that Romulus should not remain in Alba,
      and that he should be abandoned at his birth, in order that he should
      become King of Rome and founder of the fatherland. It was necessary
      that Cyrus should find the Persians discontented with the government
      of the Medes, and the Medes soft and effeminate through their long
      peace. Theseus could not have shown his ability had he not found the
      Athenians dispersed. These opportunities, therefore, made those men
      fortunate, and their high ability enabled them to recognize the
      opportunity whereby their country was ennobled and made famous.

      Those who by valorous ways become princes, like these men, acquire a
      principality with difficulty, but they keep it with ease. The
      difficulties they have in acquiring it rise in part from the new rules
      and methods which they are forced to introduce to establish their
      government and its security. And it ought to be remembered that there
      is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct,
      or more uncertain in its success, then to take the lead in the
      introduction of a new order of things. Because the innovator has for
      enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and
      lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new. This
      coolness arises partly from fear of the opponents, who have the laws
      on their side, and partly from the incredulity of men, who do not
      readily believe in new things until they have had a long experience of
      them. Thus it happens that whenever those who are hostile have the
      opportunity to attack they do it like partisans, whilst the others
      defend lukewarmly, in such wise that the prince is endangered along
      with them.

      It is necessary, therefore, if we desire to discuss this matter
      thoroughly, to inquire whether these innovators can rely on themselves
      or have to depend on others: that is to say, whether, to consummate
      their enterprise, have they to use prayers or can they use force? In
      the first instance they always succeed badly, and never compass
      anything; but when they can rely on themselves and use force, then
      they are rarely endangered. Hence it is that all armed prophets have
      conquered, and the unarmed ones have been destroyed. Besides the
      reasons mentioned, the nature of the people is variable, and whilst it
      is easy to persuade them, it is difficult to fix them in that
      persuasion. And thus it is necessary to take such measures that, when
      they believe no longer, it may be possible to make them believe by
      force.

  294. yackety smakit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Etext prepared by John Bickers, jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz
    and Bonnie Sala, Sterling Editing Services, clio@uscom.com

    Project Gutenberg Etexts are usually created from multiple editions,
    all of which are in the Public Domain in the United States, unless a
    copyright notice is included. Therefore, we do NOT keep these books
    in compliance with any particular paper edition, usually otherwise.

    We are now trying to release all our books one month in advance
    of the official release dates, for time for better editing.

    Please note: neither this list nor its contents are final till
    midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement.
    The official release date of all Project Gutenberg Etexts is at
    Midnight, Central Time, of the last day of the stated month. A
    preliminary version may often be posted for suggestion, comment
    and editing by those who wish to do so. To be sure you have an
    up to date first edition [xxxxx10x.xxx] please check file sizes
    in the first week of the next month. Since our ftp program has
    a bug in it that scrambles the date [tried to fix and failed] a
    look at the file size will have to do, but we will try to see a
    new copy has at least one byte more or less.

    Information about Project Gutenberg (one page)

    We produce about two million dollars for each hour we work. The
    fifty hours is one conservative estimate for how long it we take
    to get any etext selected, entered, proofread, edited, copyright
    searched and analyzed, the copyright letters written, etc. This
    projected audience is one hundred million readers. If our value
    per text is nominally estimated at one dollar then we produce $2
    million dollars per hour this year as we release thirty-two text
    files per month, or 384 more Etexts in 1997 for a total of 1000+
    If these reach just 10% of the computerized population, then the
    total should reach over 100 billion Etexts given away.

    The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Give Away One Trillion Etext
    Files by the December 31, 2001. [10,000 x 100,000,000=Trillion]
    This is ten thousand titles each to one hundred million readers,
    which is only 10% of the present number of computer users. 2001
    should have at least twice as many computer users as that, so it
    will require us reaching less than 5% of the users in 2001.

    We need your donations more than ever!

    All donations should be made to "Project Gutenberg/CMU": and are
    tax deductible to the extent allowable by law. (CMU = Carnegie-
    Mellon University).

    For these and other matters, please mail to:

    Project Gutenberg
    P. O. Box 2782
    Champaign, IL 61825

    When all other email fails try our Executive Director:
    Michael S. Hart

    We would prefer to send you this information by email
    (Internet, Bitnet, Compuserve, ATTMAIL or MCImail).

    ******
    If you have an FTP program (or emulator), please
    FTP directly to the Project Gutenberg archives:
    [Mac users, do NOT point and click. . .type]

    ftp uiarchive.cso.uiuc.edu
    login: anonymous
    password: your@login
    cd etext/etext90 through /etext96
    or cd etext/articles [get suggest gut for more information]
    dir [to see files]
    get or mget [to get files. . .set bin for zip files]
    GET INDEX?00.GUT
    for a list of books
    and
    GET NEW GUT for general information
    and
    MGET GUT* for newsletters.

    **Information prepared by the Project Gutenberg legal advisor**
    (Three Pages)

    ***START**THE SMALL PRINT!**FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN ETEXTS**START***
    Why is this "Small Print!" statement here? You know: lawyers.
    They tell us you might sue us if there is something wrong with
    your copy of this etext, even if you got it for free from
    someone other than us, and even if what's wrong is not our
    fault. So, among other things, this "Small Print!" statement
    disclaims most of our liability to you. It also t

  295. Re:Wil Wheaton Dead At Age 29 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u will wish you were dead by the time i finish with you cock head

  296. herotodus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Project Gutenberg Etexts are usually created from multiple editions,
    all of which are in the Public Domain in the United States, unless a
    copyright notice is included. Therefore, we do NOT keep these books
    in compliance with any particular paper edition, usually otherwise.
    We are now trying to release all our books one month in advance
    of the official release dates, for time for better editing.
    Please note: neither this list nor its contents are final till
    midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement.
    The official release date of all Project Gutenberg Etexts is at
    Midnight, Central Time, of the last day of the stated month. A
    preliminary version may often be posted for suggestion, comment
    and editing by those who wish to do so. To be sure you have an
    up to date first edition [xxxxx10x.xxx] please check file sizes
    in the first week of the next month. Since our ftp program has
    a bug in it that scrambles the date [tried to fix and failed] a
    look at the file size will have to do, but we will try to see a
    new copy has at least one byte more or less.
    Information about Project Gutenberg (one page)
    We produce about two million dollars for each hour we work. The
    fifty hours is one conservative estimate for how long it we take
    to get any etext selected, entered, proofread, edited, copyright
    searched and analyzed, the copyright letters written, etc. This
    projected audience is one hundred million readers. If our value
    per text is nominally estimated at one dollar then we produce $2
    million dollars per hour this year as we release thirty-two text
    files per month, or 384 more Etexts in 1997 for a total of 1000+
    If these reach just 10% of the computerized population, then the
    total should reach over 100 billion Etexts given away.
    The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Give Away One Trillion Etext
    Files by the December 31, 2001. [10,000 x 100,000,000=Trillion]
    This is ten thousand titles each to one hundred million readers,
    which is only 10% of the present number of computer users. 2001
    should have at least twice as many computer users as that, so it
    will require us reaching less than 5% of the users in 2001.
    We need your donations more than ever!
    All donations should be made to "Project Gutenberg/CMU": and are
    tax deductible to the extent allowable by law. (CMU = Carnegie-
    Mellon University).
    For these and other matters, please mail to:
    Project Gutenberg
    P. O. Box 2782
    Champaign, IL 61825
    When all other email fails try our Executive Director:
    Michael S. Hart
    We would prefer to send you this information by email
    (Internet, Bitnet, Compuserve, ATTMAIL or MCImail).
    ******
    If you have an FTP program (or emulator), please
    FTP directly to the Project Gutenberg archives:
    [Mac users, do NOT point and click. . .type]
    ftp uiarchive.cso.uiuc.edu
    login: anonymous
    password: your@login
    cd etext/etext90 through /etext96
    or cd etext/articles [get suggest gut for more information]
    dir [to see files]
    get or mget [to get files. . .set bin for zip files]
    GET INDEX?00.GUT
    for a list of books
    and
    GET NEW GUT for general information
    and
    MGET GUT* for newsletters.
    **Information prepared by the Project Gutenberg legal advisor**
    (Three Pages)
    ***START**THE SMALL PRINT!**FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN ETEXTS**START***
    Why is this "Small Print!" statement here? You know: lawyers.
    They tell us you might sue us if there is something wrong with
    your copy of this etext, even if you got it for free from
    someone other than us, and even if what's wrong is not our
    fault. So, among other things, this "Small Print!" sta
    Read the rest of this comment...
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Re:Yes Give it to me baby (Score:0)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 22, @02:56PM (#2601226)
    Again, the prince who holds a country differing in the above respects
    ought to make himself the head and defender of his less powerful
    neighbours, and to weaken the more powerful amongst them, taking care
    that no foreigner as powerful as himself shall, by any accident, get a
    footing there; for it will always happen that such a one will be

  297. howoldare you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gly as there is more or less ability in him who has acquired
    the state. Now, as the fact of becoming a prince from a private
    station presupposes either ability or fortune, it is clear that one or
    other of these things will mitigate in some degree many difficulties.
    Nevertheless, he who has relied least on fortune is established the
    strongest. Further, it facilitates matters when the prince, having no
    other state, is compelled to reside there in person.
    But to come to those who, by their own ability and not through
    fortune, have risen to be princes, I say that Moses, Cyrus, Romulus,
    Theseus, and such like are the most excellent examples. And although
    one may not discuss Moses, he having been a mere executor of the will
    of God, yet he ought to be admired, if only for that favour which made
    him worthy to speak with God. But in considering Cyrus and others who
    have acquired or founded kingdoms, all will be found admirable; and if
    their particular deeds and conduct shall be considered, they will not
    be found inferior to those of Moses, although he had so great a
    preceptor. And in examining their actions and lives one cannot see
    that they owed anything to fortune beyond opportunity, which brought
    them the material to mould into the form which seemed best to them.
    Without that opportunity their powers of mind would have been
    extinguished, and without those powers the opportunity would have come
    in vain.
    It was necessary, therefore, to Moses that he should find the people
    of Israel in Egypt enslaved and oppressed by the Egyptians, in order
    that they should be disposed to follow him so as to be delivered out
    of bondage. It was necessary that Romulus should not remain in Alba,
    and that he should be abandoned at his birth, in order that he should
    become King of Rome and founder of the fatherland. It was necessary
    that Cyrus should find the Persians discontented with the government
    of the Medes, and the Medes soft and effeminate through their long
    peace. Theseus could not have shown his ability had he not found the
    Athenians dispersed. These opportunities, therefore, made those men
    fortunate, and their high ability enabled them to recognize the
    opportunity whereby their country was ennobled and made famous.
    Those who by valorous ways become princes, like these men, acquire a
    principality with difficulty, but they keep it with ease. The
    difficulties they have in acquiring it rise in part from the new rules
    and methods which they are forced to introduce to establish their
    government and its security. And it ought to be remembered that there
    is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct,
    or more uncertain in its success, then to take the lead in the
    introduction.

  298. Re:bin laden VS. bill gates : the political cartoo by mozkill · · Score: 1

    that is exactly the reaction i was expecting to get. cool.

    --

    -- Betting on the survival of the media industry is a serious risk. I advise investing elsewhere.
  299. asdi had! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 26, @07:08PM (#2616602)
    gly as there is more or less ability in him who has acquired
    the state. Now, as the fact of becoming a prince from a private
    station presupposes either ability or fortune, it is clear that one or
    other of these things will mitigate in some degree many difficulties.
    Nevertheless, he who has relied least on fortune is established the
    strongest. Further, it facilitates matters when the prince, having no
    other state, is compelled to reside there in person.
    But to come to those who, by their own ability and not through
    fortune, have risen to be princes, I say that Moses, Cyrus, Romulus,
    Theseus, and such like are the most excellent examples. And although
    one may not discuss Moses, he having been a mere executor of the will
    of God, yet he ought to be admired, if only for that favour which made
    him worthy to speak with God. But in considering Cyrus and others who
    have acquired or founded kingdoms, all will be found admirable; and if
    their particular deeds and conduct shall be considered, they will not
    be found inferior to those of Moses, although he had so great a
    preceptor. And in examining their actions and lives one cannot see
    that they owed anything to fortune beyond opportunity, which brought
    them the material to mould into the form which seemed best to them.
    Without that opportunity their powers of mind would have been
    extinguished, and without those powers the opportunity would have come
    in vain.
    It was necessary, therefore, to Moses that he should find the people
    of Israel in Egypt enslaved and oppressed by the Egyptians, in order
    that they should be disposed to follow him so as to be delivered out
    of bondage. It was necessary that Romulus should not remain in Alba,
    and that he should be abandoned at his birth, in order that he should
    become King of Rome and founder of the fatherland. It was necessary
    that Cyrus should find the Persians discontented with the government
    of the Medes, and the Medes soft and effeminate through their long
    peace. Theseus could not have shown his ability had he not found the
    Athenians dispersed. These opportunities, therefore, made those men
    fortunate, and their high ability enabled them to recognize the
    opportunity whereby their country was ennobled and made famous.
    Those who by valorous ways become princes, like these men, acquire a
    principality with difficulty, but they keep it with ease. The
    difficulties they have in acquiring it rise in part from the new rules
    and methods which they are forced to introduce to establish their
    government and its security. And it ought to be remembered that there
    is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct,
    or more uncertain in its success, then to take the lead in the
    introduction.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    herotodus (Score:0)
    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 26, @06:46PM (#2616509)

  300. Turkish people suck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/p/ap/20011122/wl/1006 466648spain_adoption_mad105.html

    Allowed HTML:

    Important Stuff:
    Please try to keep posts on topic.

    Try to reply to other people comments instead of starting new threads.

    Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating
    what has already been said.

    Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.

    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be
    moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your
    threshold on the User Preferences Page)
    Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to
    CowboyNeal.

  301. More trash for a trash story! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seus, and such like are the most excellent examples. And although
    one may not discuss Moses, he having been a mere executor of the will
    of God, yet he ought to be admired, if only for that favour which made
    him worthy to speak with God. But in considering Cyrus and others who
    have acquired or founded kingdoms, all will be found admirable; and if
    their particular deeds and conduct shall be considered, they will not
    be found inferior to those of Moses, although he had so great a
    preceptor. And in examining their actions and lives one cannot see
    that they owed anything to fortune beyond opportunity, which brought
    them the material to mould into the form which seemed best to them.
    Without that opportunity their powers of mind would have been
    extinguished, and without those powers the opportunity would have come
    in vain.
    It was necessary, therefore, to Moses that he should find the people
    of Israel in Egypt enslaved and oppressed by the Egyptians, in order
    that they should be disposed to follow him so as to be delivered out
    of bondage. It was necessary that Romulus should not remain in Alba,
    and that he should be abandoned at his birth, in order that he should
    become King of Rome and founder of the fatherland. It was necessary
    that Cyrus should find the Persians discontented with the government
    of the Medes, and the Medes soft and effeminate through their long
    peace. Theseus could not have shown his ability had he not found the
    Athenians dispersed. These opportunities, therefore, made those men
    fortunate, and their high ability enabled them to recognize the
    opportunity whereby their country was ennobled and made fam

  302. Note to trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is when you set your perl scripts to troll on this garbage site.

    Re:Not to sound like an asshole, but... (Score:1)

    by ajmarks on Tuesday November 27, @11:58AM (#2619561)

    (User #447148 Info)
    OK, I can accept that.

  303. i cannot believe you guys -- didn't you catch this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ?
    ok. first i am a newbie infact this is the first and probably last time i will read / post anything here. i kept reading thru all the comments to see if someone caught on but i am amazed (as i usually am not the quickest or most original thinker) that no one else caught the crowning statement in this total farce. quotes on " is mesmerized by open source and Slashdot" quotes off. if this JUNIZ reads slashdot where is his post? why hasn't he been on the forum himself? why wouldn't he be here defending or explaining, or showing how he connects to internet with and downloads movies ( i have a cable modem and i can't ususally get a movie dl on morph or limewire before they sign off. and my bw is usually 100-300 k/sec) if he is so mesmerized?

    why? because he is a figment of some jerkoffs imagination. and for those of you who fell for it.... man, suspend your disbelief for any further posts by this author he is either a liar or a tool in either case he is not worth listening too.

    if i missed anyone who caught this before me i apologize... anyone else you are way 2 stupid to breath

    peace love and understanding! and if that doesn't work a 2x4 to the head

    c ya
    chris