And to make it perfectly fucking clear how fucked you are: you actually cited Breitbart on the Hugo Awards. As long as you pull that shit, you will struggle.
Dude, as long the mangy buzzard is an influential member of your team, you're fucked. Anyone not wanting his Breitbart-level kookery will eventually leave your site.
Fuck that shit. Do you see that tagline there? "News for Nerds"; if you can't handle about 8 HTML elements, and you really must have BBCode, then fuck off back to your scr!pt k!dd13 boards.
Yeah, but on the other hand it took SN only a few months to completely degrade into Breitbart-level rightwing kookery.
Ok, ok, that's hyperbolic, but it's a lot worse than Slashdot. Here at least there is a sizable contingent of people still willing to challenge the reactionary rhetoric.
There's a name for that: The cost of doing business.
If Apple doesn't want the risks, they can dissolve the company and pay out a megadividend to the stockholders. As long as you are active in international business, valuta risks are part of the game.
It's the typical whining of the modern Wall Street Wellfare Queen: they want all the profit, and society to bear the risk.
And MSR's finally also provide everyone with a pony.
We've all heard this before. 60 years ago people said the exact same thing about LWRs and PWRs. Frankly, the nuclear industry has promised the moon so many times before, and failed us so many times on an organisational level, that they have not a lot of credibility left.
So tell me, are you in favour of abolishing the laws against libel and slander? Would it be okay if I were to put up a site alleging you are a paedophile? It's only words, isn't it?
UUNet was an unresponsive spam sewer long before outsourcing and H1Bs became a thing. Of course, that wouldn't stop you from railing that dey took er jerbs, now would it?
Oh yes, the Unions, that were responsible for the horrid 70s designs that the American car industry couldn't sell except by hobbling the competition with tarrifs.
Another person who thinks that everyone must pay the price in loss of freedom because of the hazards imposed by a few.
Well yes. That's what a society is. You don't like, you can go live on a mountaintop as a hermit somehwere; in the meantime you will have to give up some freedoms so that other people may enjoy theirs. Got a problem with that? Tough shit.
And to make it perfectly fucking clear how fucked you are: you actually cited Breitbart on the Hugo Awards. As long as you pull that shit, you will struggle.
Dude, as long the mangy buzzard is an influential member of your team, you're fucked. Anyone not wanting his Breitbart-level kookery will eventually leave your site.
I'd say that the time to start worrying about the forced diversity is when we've finally gotten rid of the most rampant misogyny.
You want a rightwing echo chamber, fuck off to Soylent.
Frankly, I'm glad of the sizeable nutter contingent here. It makes me appreciate the few sane conservatives more.
Fuck that shit. Do you see that tagline there? "News for Nerds"; if you can't handle about 8 HTML elements, and you really must have BBCode, then fuck off back to your scr!pt k!dd13 boards.
(General you, d'oh)
I liked it. Bennet's rambling and the ranting in the comments took me back to fond memories of Jon Katz articles. Comedy gold.
Yeah, but on the other hand it took SN only a few months to completely degrade into Breitbart-level rightwing kookery.
Ok, ok, that's hyperbolic, but it's a lot worse than Slashdot. Here at least there is a sizable contingent of people still willing to challenge the reactionary rhetoric.
There's a name for that: The cost of doing business.
If Apple doesn't want the risks, they can dissolve the company and pay out a megadividend to the stockholders. As long as you are active in international business, valuta risks are part of the game.
It's the typical whining of the modern Wall Street Wellfare Queen: they want all the profit, and society to bear the risk.
And MSR's finally also provide everyone with a pony.
We've all heard this before. 60 years ago people said the exact same thing about LWRs and PWRs. Frankly, the nuclear industry has promised the moon so many times before, and failed us so many times on an organisational level, that they have not a lot of credibility left.
Somehow I feel you will miss the irony of your post.
So tell me, are you in favour of abolishing the laws against libel and slander? Would it be okay if I were to put up a site alleging you are a paedophile? It's only words, isn't it?
Utter fucking bullshit. Without the words, there is no action to take.
And if had said, in the days of DADT, that I spotted Lietenant Smith in a gay bar, I would have killed his career.
Speech is action, and it can certainly hurt. Only idiots and teenagers living in their mom's basements believe otherwise.
Now that's an example of complete fucking illiteracy.
Try telling that to those who were denounced to the secret police in totalitarian states. Oh wait, most of those people died.
tl;dr: Fuck you and your libertard ranting.
Since when were Colorado Springs and the Malheur reserve not terrorist events?
Says the right-wing crybaby whose parent comment is currently at +5
Witness right-wing fragility in action, people.
Cities are where people stop being nomads and start building civilisation. It's clear where your priorities lie.
Yeah, thought so. No evidence, just right-wing whackjob talking point regurgitation.
At least you've proven to be a decent parrot. Wanna cracker?
Got any numbers to back up your gut feelings?
UUNet was an unresponsive spam sewer long before outsourcing and H1Bs became a thing. Of course, that wouldn't stop you from railing that dey took er jerbs, now would it?
Come back when thorium reactors are more than a pie in the sky dream.
With their current arsenal, Israel can handle a hundred years of the overgrown firecrackers Hamas fires.
In short: Israel is not the victim, and has not been the victim since the Six Day War.
Mart
True. The racism is just the cherry on top.
Oh yes, the Unions, that were responsible for the horrid 70s designs that the American car industry couldn't sell except by hobbling the competition with tarrifs.