Simple to fix: unimproved land is taxed, land with improvements is not taxed.
You could go one further, and this would make sense much like not taxing food, that land which sole purpose is to provide housing to the property owners is not taxed, commercial land and unimproved land is taxed.
It is legal proof of wrong doing, not a logical or scientific proof. By those standards, it is an assumption. But if Spoliation is in evidence, then the alleged wrongdoing is "proved" too have happened and a jury can be instructed to consider it proved.
AS for the emails, the IRS has a requirement to keep them for 7 years, and that is done on the servers, they use exchange.
ALso, they are required to make hard copy prints of critical emails. Not having those printed files is proof of not following the email retention standards.
I am familiar with Sous-vide, but don't like the texture it produces. Unless it is Filet Mignon, then that jelly like texture is desirable... although it is not my choice of cut. (Del Monaco, Rib eye, something with a bone in it like T-Bone, or aStanding Rib Roast for special occasions)
I generally use a slow indirect heat to get to the desired done-ness, then hit it with high heat.
One more point: the IRS had an obligation by default to keep those emails, the fact that the were negligent in doing so points to the gross incompetence, not the criminality.
The legal concept that if you cannot provide (or destroy) evidence that is know to exist, then that failure is proof you have something to hide.
Since the emails were known to exist, were promised to Congress, and then later "lost" is proof that there were emails that proved the IRS was being used for political purposes.
Add to that the unusual number and timing of visits to the White House by IRS officials tied to those emails, there is sufficient evidence to show the linkage.
Slashdot Mirror
The president's reaction was:
"I Can haz Cheezeburger?"
No, I am not kidding:
https://twitter.com/jonkarl/st...
I can see it now...
"You Have MAAAAIL!"
I dunno.
Think a "Wonderman" would have any attraction?
I don't.
It is as bad as having Archie be killed by a gun nut while protecting a gay character...
because pandering.
you are talking about something bigger.
You use your college focus to get the toolsets you need to be a generally competent employee. What you do with it, that is what is important.
My degree is in Humanities, but I have a current career in IT, and the tools transfer to other careers.
So should hers, whatever she decides. (Don't do Humanities, it is a crock now, all touchy feelly and not the critical thinking I got 30 years ago)
I see what you did there...
It pretty much is, for values above $10K. as the banks report such large withdraws anyway.
And crossing the border with large sums of cash will get you a special invitation as well, so there is no relief there.
They used a machine for census taking and made under license by a German company.
That is like blaming IBM for all the things that people did with IBM PCs.
Look, it is just a big aluminum tube in the air...
stick a pull tab on it for emergencies and call it good.
is protecting it's future employees, customers, and H1B visa holders.
Simple to fix: unimproved land is taxed, land with improvements is not taxed.
You could go one further, and this would make sense much like not taxing food, that land which sole purpose is to provide housing to the property owners is not taxed, commercial land and unimproved land is taxed.
Well, and take Slashdot as an example, specifically AGW discussions.
Pro AGW posters post pro AGW posts... non-AGW mods mod them down.
AGW skeptics post skeptical AGW posts... AGW mods mod them down.
Posters need to decide if they are willing to take the Karma hit of posting their contribution, especially if they are in the minority view
In the end, the filtering is imposed to bring a hegemony to the subject, rather than open discussion.
It is legal proof of wrong doing, not a logical or scientific proof. By those standards, it is an assumption.
But if Spoliation is in evidence, then the alleged wrongdoing is "proved" too have happened and a jury can be instructed to consider it proved.
AS for the emails, the IRS has a requirement to keep them for 7 years, and that is done on the servers, they use exchange.
ALso, they are required to make hard copy prints of critical emails. Not having those printed files is proof of not following the email retention standards.
Not to mention any environmental benefit.
And a Bunny.
I am familiar with Sous-vide, but don't like the texture it produces. Unless it is Filet Mignon, then that jelly like texture is desirable... although it is not my choice of cut. (Del Monaco, Rib eye, something with a bone in it like T-Bone, or aStanding Rib Roast for special occasions)
I generally use a slow indirect heat to get to the desired done-ness, then hit it with high heat.
I would like to see your numbers.
Despite half of my system being tax credits, it is still taking 7 years to earn back the investment.
If I still lived in Milpitas, with PG&E gouging me, it would take 4 or 5 years.
Of course, I did not need an air conditioner there, so I used a lot less power.
I work for one of the companies named, I know it was a publicity stunt and for the tax savings.
It is more like a U shape, with Distrust on the vertical and Knowledge on the horizontal axis.
One end does not trust the internet because they don't know what is out there,
the other end does not trust the internet because they know what is out there.
Those in the middle are just knowledgeable enough to be dangerous.
No,
we ask the obvious question: How much did it cost to save that money?
If they invested 50B to get that 1.1B, it is not that wise of a deal.
Their productivity would be considerably less than 1/6 as well
Too long, didn't watch.
I want to read my information, not listen to some windbag read it.
If I want a steak like a steakhouse, I want 800C
200C is too low for a pizza, unless you are talking "american" pizza. I get the pizza stone as hot as possible, somewhere north of 250C as I can get.
Prime rib or steak I get the oven as high as possible, leave a cast iron grill in there and then sear it fast.
One more point: the IRS had an obligation by default to keep those emails, the fact that the were negligent in doing so points to the gross incompetence, not the criminality.
Yes, it is called Spoliation of Evidence.
The legal concept that if you cannot provide (or destroy) evidence that is know to exist, then that failure is proof you have something to hide.
Since the emails were known to exist, were promised to Congress, and then later "lost" is proof that there were emails that proved the IRS was being used for political purposes.
Add to that the unusual number and timing of visits to the White House by IRS officials tied to those emails, there is sufficient evidence to show the linkage.