Marvel's New Thor Will Be a Woman
An anonymous reader writes: Marvel Comics has announced that Thor, the thunder god whose story has been told in comic books, movies, and TV shows since the 1960s, will fall from grace, and no longer be able to wield his hammer Mjolnir. A brand new female character will take up the name Thor and continue the series. Jason Aaron, the series writer, said, "This is not She-Thor. This is not Lady Thor. This is not Thorita. This is THOR. This is the THOR of the Marvel Universe. But it's unlike any Thor we've ever seen before." Marvel's Wil Moss added, "The new Thor continues Marvel's proud tradition of strong female characters like Captain Marvel, Storm, Black Widow and more. And this new Thor isn't a temporary female substitute — she's now the one and only Thor, and she is worthy!"
I am Woman, hear me Thor!
That is all.
But this summary and article both kinda sorta imply 616(i.e. main) universe.
This is beyond ridiculous.
Congratulations to a comic book company for changing a male character from very old mythology into a woman.
Perhaps they can next make a comic book with Jesus as a woman?
sad
Assaults involving women as the aggressor incoming.
Finally, not only my wife will enjoy seeing Thor without a shirt on.
Still, this is stupid. Incredibly stupid.
But is she also going to be half-black/half-latino, transgendered and disabled? Don't they need to pander to more groups?
Now you're just a comic book superhero getting dumped on for being a man.
In related news, Odin will become a transgender drag queen with a flair for theatrics. Loki, however, will remain low-key.
Just another comic book gimmick like female Robin, and gay minority Spiderman. Comic books can't go more than a few months without having to completely change everything around and "spice things up". Just try following a single title for more than two years.
So, her name will be Thora (óra is legit Icelandic name, just like ór)
Even when they're trying their damndest to be original, everything they do is still a rehash... Talk about being stuck in a multi-generational rut.
She is the one and only non-temporary thor, until she in turn "falls from grace" and is replaced with a NEW non-temporary THOR!
Is this why Green Lantern turned Gay?
Talk about confusing.
One more opportunity for a character with big bazoombas and skimpy clothes to pander to their core reader base.
putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
Yes, it matters. We gotta know which hammer she'll wield.
The Thor films seem to have a lot of appeal for my wife and female friends, partly due to beefcake. I wonder how much confusion this will cause between the comics and movies.
Thor has always been a male demigod. They are just pandering at this point.
My karma is not a Chameleon.
One of the early What If? comics Marvel put out was about Jane Foster finding Thor's Hammer instead of Don Blake. There is a hilarious summary of it here. Not sure if it's the earliest example of Thor as a woman but's its gotta be close!
Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
No matter how they want to market it, the odds are great that it actually ends up exactly like they said it won't: Which ever version of She-Thor, Thorita, Thora, Thornina, Chick-Thor, Shor, Shorely, Shirley, etc. the 'Net finds most amusing will end up being the "real" name. Then they'll capitulate and go back---unless they luck-out and it sells well after the initial marketing push.
Great, now this is reminding me of MST3k's "Space Mutiny". Rip Steak-face, Crud Bonemeal, Big McLarge-Huge, etc.
You want to change a character? Change one you created. It could be the most compelling story in the world, but if I am buying the book for Thor, then I want Thor.
Wait, no...that's a different show.
Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
But will she make as much as her white, straight, male predecessor?
The renaming of its famous comic book and TV character, "Wonder Person."
Chris Hemsworth and Lynda Carter are reportedly in talks to assume the other's iconic role. No word yet if they're planning to share costumes.
Stop using your platforms to push marxist propaganda. It's so blatant when history is so blatantly contradicted for no good reason. The mythos always depicted thor as male. Why is it so terrible to have a dominant male in a protagonist role? It's not misogyny.
Are we so unimaginative now that it's not possible to come up with and build new characters? Existing characters have to be completely substituted, just to piggyback on the established lore and history?
And for what? To satisfy some new gender-equality metric? Seriously, I know it would take time and effort, but surely you can come up with a compelling unique story for a woman without them having to be propped up by a different character's previous popularity.
Thor is a very male name in Scandinavia. It isn't like people in the US name their daughters Jeffery....
But If gender swapping their most popular characters while keeping their gender specific names is going to be a thing, they should just go all out.
They should Make peter parker & clark kent women,.. & make Lois lane a man, etc...
Come on comic book industry, I dare you.... triple dog dare you
she-thor tranny...
A brand new female character will take up the name Thor and continue the series. Jason Aaron, the series writer, said, "This is not She-Thor. This is not Lady Thor. This is not Thorita. This is THOR.
Uh, yeah. Like when that other guy was Batman? But then he wasn't Bruce Wayne, was he?
systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
Researchers have discovered a lost Shakespeare play, entitled "Orphelia, Prince of Denmark"....
Meanwhile, DC is afraid of making a Wonder Woman movie because, hey, who wants to watch a movie with a woman lead character?...
Depowering a beloved character so a woman can take his place is not the way to show respect for women. This isn't feminism, it's just ridicullous. If Marvel wants to show respect to women, they should make sure their existing female characters are well-written and well-drawn. As it stands, I don't believe for a second that this new Thor isn't going to be subject to the same sexist tropes as so many other superheroines.
Gotta go for the lesbo action. Howard Stern takes over Marvel.
Political Correctness alive and well....
Epic way to annoy people this move. This move is as annoying as the song, "A Boy Named Sue."
Ah well, green is the new black. Up is the new down. Idiocy abounds.
So she isn't strong and independent enough to keep her own name. *facepalm* Failed before the first issue.
Let me guess... This new female Thor will wear a skimpy outfit, and much less armor than the previous, male Thor. But this is objectification is somehow empowering to women...
If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
I notice that the artist's name in these renderings looks suspiciously like an anagram or such. I'm sensing a jest.
DC Comics announces the first gender neutral character. Super They.
More T&A for the male readers and unreal body expectations for the females. Win-win. :)
[John]
Shit better not happen!
Consider the advice of the great philosophers Nelson and Mr. T.
I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
Must be Loki's doing?
I give it two years at most before they bring him back to normal.
As long as we "Thor" gets the eye-candy treatment in the movies that we did with the male Thor? Fine. If they butch it up, I cry foul.
I'm all for strong women. Hell, I have an 11 year old daughter. So I like the idea of her having strong role models. But this is a little weird considering the comic book character is based off of the male god of Norse legend by the same name. And why is this a "fall from grace" as TFS states? And why can't (s)he wield Mjolnir?
While I'm asking, why is it that most of these comic book "strong women" have a pair of double D boobs (at minimum) falling out of their outfits? I don't care how skilled a women is, she ain't gonna be fighting worth a damn in 5 inch 'fuck-me-heels' with her ass and boobs falling out of her costume.
Thor has previously been replaced by a frog and an alien with a horse's skull for a head.
They usually do so good using established works and expanding upon them. At least call her a Goddess if you're going to do it right.
Just scrolling through the testosterone fueled rage shows that /. readers know nothing about the article as well as the character in question.
Dr. Donald Blake runs from aliens and finds Mjolnir in a cave disguised as a walking stick. He smacks it into a rock and he becomes Thor.
So that's fair, but a woman finding Mjolnir would be too far fetched?
There is a bit about Odin putting Thor into the body of Donald Blake to teach him humility. This is fine with the readers, but putting Thor in a female body (lol) is too far fetched?
Or not....
The comic book industry has started to realize that sexism is bad for business. There's still plenty of remnants left (especially at DC - see the New 52 Starfire kerfluffle), but it's changing. The comics press has been talking about it for years, indie comics have been doing it for longer, and now Marvel is riding the trend. If you can even call it a trend - I really doubt "treating both genders as equals" is something that will go out of style, barring another dark age or something.
Yes, it's a bit gimmicky, taking an established character and replacing him with a her. But comic plots in general are pretty gimmicky. And they took care to keep the "old" character around, he's just depowered (something that happens to superheroes pretty much constantly). So it's not as big a change as it might outwardly seem (especially since Marvel has two continuities, and they haven't said if this is Ultimate universe or the original universe Thor being replaced - so either way, a male Thor will still be around in at least one universe).
Marvel's business side is probably doing it only because it's trendy and makes them look good, but I don't feel like the writers are doing it purely for that reason. Hard to tell at this point, though. The armor is potentially problematic - boob plate is better than most female characters used to get, but it's still not good design (both from a realist perspective (good way to break your own ribs and guide blows straight to your heart), and a feminist perspective (you're only doing it because boobs)). But other than that, they're at least talking like they're making her a proper female character. Marvel's been doing well with that of late (see Ms Marvel for a widely-praised example).
Modern feminism gets a bad rap because of the extremists, because they're the loudest and easiest to argue with. But they aren't the majority - the bulk are just people who think gender equality is a good thing, which is much harder to argue with.
I'm confused - the TV series will have a different character than the movies? But both are from Marvel? Is this a reboot, did male Thor die?
I'm so tired of reboots every five to ten years. How about they make a continuous series that builds and stick to it?
Does no one else remember Beta Ray Bill from Walt Simonson's run in the '80s (the golden age for Thor and large swathes of Marvel, in my opinion). Beta Ray Bill was able to wield Mjolnir and Thor's power even though he was a vaguely-humanoid alien.
Political Correctness has hit comic books! Whoda thunk it. Create a female character if you want but don't superimpose a female gender on a male character. That is unless Thor is now going to have a sex change? Wait Norse God, Denmark. It makes sense now! Thor will undergo a sex change operation, talk about predictable.
Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
This has got to be the stupidest idea ever!
Or on the other hand ....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...
At least they didn't have Thor get shot to death with an evil black gun whilst defending his homosexual best friend. Comic books need to stay away from politics...far, far away.
Well we as consumers don't have to like the change or more importantly support or buy into the stupid idea of a Female Thor. I wasn't a Thor fan anyways. Stop thinking we like female super heros, well we do, when there scantly clad. I never bought into the "Cough" Strong female hero unless they are scantly clad lol. Call me a pig i don't Give a F :) I like my women with nice curves and a soft ass.Women shaped like guys make me want to gag. But if thats your cup of tea well we all like different things so be it. This is all IMO of course.
Jack of all trades,master of none
Ugh, how about Thorella, Thorette, or Thorina. What a buncha idjits that are going to do this.
Oh, yeah! Wise guy, huh? Woob woob woob woob! Nyuk! Nyuk!
Comment removed based on user account deletion
We already did this... Even a racist clock is right twice a day
In Marvel Lore, anyone who is worthy may wield the hammer and gain the power of thor... this has included
A horsefaced dude (beta ray bill who now wields a dupe of the hammer, sorta)
A frog named Throg
it has also been wielded by Storm (who is a woman) and Captain America.
This is a non-story, and not the first time a woman has wielded Mjolnir.
One night the Norse god Thor was feeling a bit horny so he decided to come down to earth to satisfy his needs.
He picked up a good looking woman with a great body and they went to her apartment she only had one small problem, she had a speech impediment, but this didn't affect the sex. They went at it hot and heavy all night long.
In the morning Thor had to leave so he decided he should at least tell her his name so he said to her, "I'm Mighty Thor and I have to leave now."
She looked at him and said, "You're thore?! I'm tho thor I can hardly pith."
Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
Karma: Chameleon
I wonder how God of war would look if worked over by these idiots. Zeus, Hera, you get my meaning.
Anyway, if they wanted to make people look and feel stupid for liking comics, they've succeeded.
lmao
And now Thor has big boobs! Awesome!
To be fair, minting Thor as a superhero that, though a series of cosmic macguffins, teams up with Captain America and Ironman, is a deeply stupid idea to begin with.
Next up is Superman. He went to LA and got a sex change. She will remain called Superman, however, Clark Kent is now known as Clara Kent.
Thor the son of Odin. http://www.rosala-viking-centr... Hmm. Costumed superheroes can move on from generation to generation as done well in Watchmen but genuine gods are surely a bit more stable.
Easy solution: Don't buy the books. I would guess, the overwhelming majority of comic book buyers are men. Let's see if the male readers can make a sufficiently large bump in the profit Marvel makes with the Thor books, so it cannot be compensated by the three additional female readers Marvel might get through this move. If not... you deserve not better.
Mjolnir isn't just any screwdriver! It's a sonic screwdriver of kick-ass! The hammer part it just sonically created. ;o)
Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
http://boobsdontworkthatway.com
Looking forward to more Fighting Fuck Toys from Marvel!
And whatever you do, don't look at Spiderwoman at http://boobsdontworkthatway.tumblr.com/page/5 !!!!
Marvel, in recent times, have been pretty progressive with their hero in the comics. Do I need to point out that a black Hispanic kid has inherited the role of Spider-man? What about the Pakistani teen who is the new Miss Marvel? I think a woman as the Thor is great. Not some She-Thor or Thor-Woman knock off but a female with the title of Thor itself. Ever have a little girl that wanted to be Batman or Spiderman for Halloween? Would you tell her no, she can only be Batgirl or Spider-girl? Yes, the new Thor is a bit sexy but perhaps once we can get over locking gender-roles for superheros we can then deal with that issue.
Marvel...the Microsoft of mythology. Don't worry, gender bending's a feature, not a bug!
Yeah so I'm gonna have to say this REEKS of Ms. Male....
http://www.feministfrequency.com/2013/11/ms-male-character-tropes-vs-women/
You can wish the moon was made of cheese, and you can announce it is, but it won't make it so.
Thor is a male norse god, no matter how you try to retcon it. The new character will not be Thor, period. It'll be a female character called Thor.
I don't know why they did this, because it's completely stupid. The norse mythology is rich with strong women, equal in power to their male counterparts. They could have easily built up any of them into a major character.
Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
Why not make Thor a Lesbian-Pre-op-transexual-Blasian-Mutant-Cyborg-Dog/Horse-hybrid-Jesus/Buddha. Don't discriminate Marvel.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_X
Loki tricked Odin into making Thor a woman to teach him humility. It was really just Loki being a dick.
You've gone too far Marvel.
Subject really said all I wanted to say...
My 5' 0" Irish Grandmother was VA hospital RN . She was my first female superhero.
Flipping 6' 3" Marines around their beds one handed while giving anyone who tried to give her the jeast bit of lip Instant Kill Gaze O' Death.
After Wonder Woman is killed, a brave young man takes up the bracers, lasso and breastplate, becoming.....
Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
Look, sometimes this works like when Duncan played Kingpin, but usually it's a transparent money grab.
As long as it's done in the spirit of Blonde Shepard (ME2), I think it'll be awesome.
I think Marvel & Paramount really wanted to push Sif & the warriors 3 into a spin off. The problem was they were a bunch of pussies in the first Thor and they were even weaker in the second. This is a a blatant money grab and a not very original one.
Hmm, Thor is not property of Marvel Comics..They have hijacked a Nordic cultural icon. Taking something away from someone else's culture and making money with it caused issue for Marvel. I would think taking a cultural icon from a foreign country and giving it a sex change will cause more issue. Thor is not their story. and not theirs to change. I'm betting eventual litigation, if not from Americans..then from the Nordics. What next, are they going to steal Poseidon from the Greeks and create a transsexual against the will of others?
If they can grab money with that, then it is right what they are doing. Making money is the first and foremost task of a company.
Is it already April Fools'?
First they re-approriate "Shark Week" to mean "The week I Get my period" and RUIN what was a great holiday, and now they take away THOR too? This feminism bullshit has gone far too far!
Well yes and no. They could sell all of their trademarks and IP for $10 and that would be making money. Shoving something out just for a short term gain isn't always the best plan.
Never thought I'd find myself searching google images for "thor nude", but here we are.
Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
This is very "green lantern-ish" sounding to me. The way it's explained here: http://time.com/2987551/thor-m... makes it sound like whoever wields Mjolnir is Thor. Current Thor becomes unable to wield the hammer, so the hammer choses someone else, who happens to be a woman. She becomes Thor, and previous Thor becomes "big muscular guy but not superhero" or something.
This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
That's all this is... shameless pandering.
I'm not surprised that there can be a lady Thor - my wife can easily shoot thunderbolts, especially when she is pissed with me. After 40 years of marriage, I have the scars to prove it! :-)
well, i can't say i'm surprised. i've been bored with marvel movies for a couple of years now. they just saturated the market. in my opinion this is only further proof they're scraping the bottom of the barrel creativity-wise. sure, their movies usually have great production values but the actual story and dialogue is usually barely mediocre.
making the previously very masculine thor female just seems like a silly gimmick and not even an interesting one.
now we will have a new character for sextoons hehehehe.
This time it's "what if Thor was a woman - what would change?"
It's no less valid in the setting than "what if Jimmy Olsen was turned into a Gorilla - again?"
Whether it's readable or not and breaks other things in the setting is a different story. Some artists and writers could make it interesting.
Just like what was done with turning Wonder Woman into a female Batman with no superpowers a while back. That was mentioned here a while back and I'll bet that's over and now a side story with zero effect on continuity.
Now we can have loads of girls thinking that they're special goddesses instead of mere mortal princesses. How trite.
From the posts here it looks like a lot of us are just grabbing the wrong end of the hammer - Marvel see "Thor" as the job title of whoever has the hammer and the moviegoing public like me see "Thor" as the name of a specific character born in Asgard.
So I think most of the complaints are just people grabbing the wrong end of the hammer and rubbing vigorously in public - not a good look.
Nerd Fail!
It's not just armor, it's a costume. A costume is meant to not only protect the wearer, but to distract the attacker(s).
Just like you probably can't talk normally to really good-looking girls, in the comic universe, attackers cannot fully focus on attacking when the costume-wearer is a hot chick.
Nothing personal, it's just part of Canon.
Sooner, we plot, or later, Jason Aaron WILL DIE.
Drop the "T".....
I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
Nothing wrong with female superheroes but this just doesn't sit with me. Okay? I think Thor will be a great new bunch of comics and stuff but I fell in love with the older Thor. In the comics I own and in the movies. I love the idea of this but I'd have preferred her as a seperate character (yeah, I know she is but I mean a different hero with different powers and stuff like each of the x men are original) I'd probably miss Thor as he is now but love Thor as she will be and I'm curious as how he will become less worthy. I personally like the au when Thor dies and Natasha decides she's worthy and can wield Mjolnir and becomes her own goddess. It sits with me better for some reason. However this ends up I will be watching and reading and will await this new twist while missing the male/older/original Thor. For me, it'll be bittersweet.
I'm looking forward to seeing the new character use her powers to create a miniature hurricane to clean the bathtub. [I kid, I kid]
The "Executives" of Marvel are:
1) Findable (as well as each member of their families, including immediate and "relatives"
2) Targetable (a clear path to the head)
3) Killable (who cares ... not me ... it's just fun ... more dead for per cartridge). :-)
Looking at the pic, Whoopi Goldberg called dibs if they make a movie for it...
Personally I'm holding out for a female version of Juggernaut or the Blob.
On one hand I want to shout "Hypocrites! Who here complained when Starbuck was turned into a female?"
On the other hand I just can't see how the single Marvel character that screams "masculinity" can be turned into a woman without becoming a comic figu... erh... you know what I mean!
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
The Aesir already have women among them. What about Freya, or the Valkyries? Marvel don't need to do this.
I'd actually be interested to know the opinions of any genuine Asatruar who read these comics, about this development. Do you consider it sacrilege?
Last time I checked.
Your dude is a chick.
Because this is just so outrageous compared to Thor being an alien space horse or a frog, right?
Jack Chick will be recasting Jesus as a woman to appeal to the female audience.
The new Thor continues Marvel's proud tradition of ...
... completely ignoring things like historical background, common knowledge and elementary logic.
Being Danish, it has always irked me, that this cartoon 'Thor' is portrayed as a tall, sledge-hammer wielding body builder with lanky, blond hair, full body wax and a placid temperament; the traditional thunder-god, son of Odin and married to Sif, was red-haired and -bearded (and generally hairy as a man would be), foul-tempered and wielded a hammer, mjolnir, that was famously short-shafted. I suppose a busty, female 'Thoretta' isn't really all that much further from the original. It just another American, plasticky product, like 'He-Man' and 'Power Rangers'.
Now Marvel has officially jumped the shark and somebody will have to invent a new category of movies.
Thoreen.
Thora. (the explorer)
Thorida. (if she's from Florida)
Thorala.
I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
This kind of stuff used to be novel, but now is just dumb. Me thinks the girls have enough Girl power roll models.
My daughter Jeffrey is now in here room crying here eyes out
Politically Correct Bull.
And this new Thor isn't a temporary female substitute — she's now the one and only Thor, and she is worthy! They said the same thing back then for the new Spiderman, the new Green Lantern(DC), the new ... you get it. When sales plummet for a few months(like they always do, because comic books oldies only like their sacred Statu Quo), they'll bring back the old Thor fast enough.
Better be shirtless scenes!
Break out the chain mail bikini! You go Thor!
Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!
Vote for Bernie in 2016!
I have no doubt she will be worthy. But I also have no doubt Marvel will spec her with large bosoms and a bustier.
1) The new Thor apparently shaves her armpits.
2) Again with the "female does what a male does, but without the powerful hammer"
Well, apparently, you only have to fool the majority of people for a little while.
If they want to sell some comics, they should make Wonder Woman a man. And Batgirl a guy as well. Maybe, then it would sell better.
Ninjas don't carry tic tacs
"Thor, the thunder god whose story has been told in comic books, movies, and TV shows since the 1960s, will fall from grace, and no longer be able to wield his hammer Mjolnir"
Actually, no. Not correct. His story is of Nordic Mythology that precedes the relatively recent and infantile age of comics.
I know, lets give the new Thor round black ears.. No Lets make Thor into Micky Mouse - Mickey Thor!! Marvel has this nasty habit of messing with and messing up their best characters. A politically correct female Thor is ridiculous - changing Thor's identity is ridiculous. (nothing against women BTW but this is just ugly) Didn't they once try to do this with Superman? changing his identity almost killed off the character completely. I like a lot of Marvels characters but that always comes with the knowledge that sooner or later they will shit on them - and you..
Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
A comic is a very strange world, its a place where women and men are hyper-sexualized, they die and wake up after a short period of time, there are people with fictional superpowers which can defeat laws of physics , it's a place where the mythological history is rewritten over and over again. I just don't understand people, this is just another turn of the events in order to create a false sense of polemic, If you are expecting a very successful and commercial comic book with real characters and realistic proportions, well, you can do it, but i don't know how many of those are you going to sell. Sad? yes, but that's how the comics work
or even Allah as a comic book superhero? If you're going to treat one God like that shouldn't you do it to all?
Thorita, wielder of the pink hammer.
I'm not completely against a female representation of Thor. Just don't call her Tor/Thor. Hey, I would use the thorn if Slashdot let me, but beta refuses to fix. Call her Tordis. Guess what - we Scandinavians are sick and tired of popular culture ruining good stories and supplanting them with stupid modern agendas, allegory, and stereotypes. Here's a lesson we can all learn - if you want to get the most out of a story read the book instead.
Finally, Marvel is brave enough to allow one of their heroes to come out and get a gender-change operation!!! Transexual Thor... or better knwon by it's heor name Trans-is-Thor!!!!
-- 29A the number of the Beast
They could just have taken any of the many hardcore war-godesses like Thud, the very daughter of Thor, as badass as the fther... or even more, she avanged him!!! Hail Odin, brothers and sisters !
-- 29A the number of the Beast
... Christianities next Virgin Mary will be a man.
And be ready for the 2050 Blockbuster where Evil Adele Hitler conquers Europe.
The new Thor gives new meaning to the term 'thundercunt'! :)
I am Woman, hear me Thor!
That is all.
Loved it. clap, clap, clap
Seriously Marvel? You couldn't just create a new female character...maybe in an alternate universe or something. You have to genderbend Thor. Well shit. Marvel never had a logo for an image, but I would like to suggest a big Vagina as your logo. I guess it's not just in the movies where you can just swap out an actor. You can do it in comic books too, to an even greater extent. Remove the penis, we don't need it. This female empowerment thing is getting out of hand. But I don't mind staying at home while the husky women go out mining.
Seriously? I was sure that after 500 comments someone would have sited rule 63! no one?!?
well, Siting rule 63 of the rules of the internet: "For every male character there is a female version. No Exceptions."
Well done Marvel. Well done.
--Wait... rule 62.2, "For every female character there is a male version. No Exceptions."... concept... too... meta... nested... results... are... nested...
This is just silly. Thor isn't someone Marvel made up, he's a loaner from a well established mythology, in which he is male. Why not come up with a new, female, superhero? It really comes across as pandering to me.
That is all.
The Norse Germanic concept of the God of Thunder known as Thor, is based on the African Egyptian God named Menes aka Narmer, In Niger and also along the Nile he is known as Shango, however in about 2500 BC the God of Thunder was depicted as a woman, named Candace, Queen of Kush / Ethiopia. http://a.disquscdn.com/uploads... Read on http://sco.lt/7SWSIb
izmirin tÃf ¼ Türkiyenin en Iyi eskort sitesidir arkadaÃ...Ylar ettik
izmir escort bayan vip http://www.smyrnaeskort.com
Well a female Thor? Now that's interesting, hopefully the actress is hot. https://vid.me/BWN
I don't know why they wouldn't just make a series about the other already awesome Norse goddesses or legends. Lady Sif was a beast, and there are already the Valkyries and Freyja. Why change the old mythos when there is plenty of new material waiting to be used?
I will totally give up Marvel and it's movies if they ever sex change Wolverine.