What really surprises me is that people on slashdot.org aren't cheering for the demise of Flash. A proprietary, closed, you have to buy our software to develop on language is being told to fuck off in favor of an open, anyone can develop for without any cost language (Flash vs. HTML5)
Is this bizzaro world? Last I checked I had to buy a closed source software package to be able to write a flash app. Mind you, I've never done that so I might be wrong and forgive me if I am.
If this was about the policies of the store or something else, I'd understand. But this is about the support of an open architecture against a for-fee architecture.
And on top of that, it keeps people from playing fucking farmville or evony. Win win.
How about you solve some other real problems first before getting all rabble rabble about a video codec?
That's the real issue as to why people don't care. You're not going to fire up your average internet user about the evils of that h.264 code shackled by patents. To them, the shackling is non-existent because they don't get a monthly bill for it. Claiming it's part of the OS and the the OS they got with their computer would have made it magically cheaper unless you're talking hundreds of dollars no one is going to care.
The only thing the mozilla group's stand about not supporting h.264 does for me is mean I skip using the browser because it's just stupid. It's one thing to not have the codec 'built in' but if my computer already has a legally licensed h.264 decoder your piddly ass browser stopping me from using it because you want to 'make a stand' is retarded.
I've long felt that silly things like this is what holds open source software back from mainstream assistance. It's just a personal view and you can disagree all you like and try to educate me to your view, but in the end, it's not worth the effort put into it because there are better things to worry about.
'humanity's dependency on a few, often secretive, organisations'? Please, eye roll smiley face here. That's the most ridiculous thing ever. YOUR H.264 CODEC IS MADE BY THE ILLUMINATI!!11!! it just looks crazy and people will ignore it and yet another thing goes down the tubes.
This assumes that RAID controller manufacturers won't be making any changes though.
RAID for years has relied on millisecond access times. So why spend a lot of money on an ASIC & Subsystem that can go faster? So taking a RAID card designed for slow (relatively) spinning disks and attaching them to SSD of course the RAID card is going to be a bottleneck.
However subsystems are going to be designed to work with SSD that has much higher access times. When that happens, this so called 'bottleneck' is gone. You know every major disk subsystem vendor is working on these. Sounds like a disk vendor is sponsoring 'studies' to convince people not to invest in SSD technologies now knowing that a lot of companies are looking at big purchases this year because of the age of equipment after the downturn.
Keep in mind the new player changes it's better to train up stuff to 1m skill points and then add the learning skills later.
Learning skills only work if you're around more than 90d or so. Before that, if you get frustrated and quit the learning skills only accelerate that process.
Sounds like you tried to join an elite pee vee pee alliance and not one that actually understands how to play the game.
A two day old character in a rifter can make a huge difference in a fight. People who say otherwise are clueless. The larger alliances (that are competent) keep rifters around and give them out like candy from a van. yes they can die fast but still the can lock faster on those big expensive ships and ruin their day. Yes, there are bigger & shiner ships out there when you don't care if you lose your ship because it costs you nothing, and in fact makes you isk by insurance payments for the lost ship, you are much more gung ho about killing things and getting a 'tackle' (stopping a ship from warping) on those big ships that people who have played for years with.
That tackle is enough for the other guys in your corp to get a stronger hold and to melt the guy however that two day old rifter made all the difference.
As an old Goonfleet motto said: My Ship Cost Less than your ammunition, My modules were picked off rats, I don't even know if my guns are loaded, and I'm about to ruin your life.
As far as penalty driven PvP and PvE (your ship goes boom, no getting it back, and stuff you fit to your ship can go boom with it along with stuff you were carrying)
Owning space regions is expensive & cumbersome, but to be honest I don't remember the housing mechanic real well but it's similar. You can own a Station as well has have Towers referred to as 'POS' (Player Owned Stations)
anything outside of account stealing and real money stealing is allowed and not reversed.
But you're not an elf running around casting things, you're in a space ship.
i'm completely skeptical the meteor hit him before hitting the ground. I'd me more inclined to agree he got nailed by something flying back at him that was hot. Wouldn't the kinetic energy transfer into the ground heat it up enough to burn the skin slightly as it hit you? I would think he'd lose that hand if not his life if he got hit by a rock that was going fast enough/had enough mass to drive a crater like that after striking him first
i know i've watched a ton of movies and my view of physics has been warped since I was in school but it just doesn't seem possible to be physically hit by something, and the energy not transferring to you, and still have enough to punch that kind of hole in the ground.
1) Someone will take a crayon to the screen 2) If they have siblings, it will get yanked off table while they fight over keyboard 3) it'll sit there, hardly ever used, until they either figure out how to watch movies on it (DVDs) or get old enough to use it.
Really under the age of four you should play on the computer with them, not let them have one. There are always exceptions to that but until three/four years of age their dexterity and fine motor control can't handle a mouse, and the keyboard is just something you beat on instead of recognizing the letters.
the thing that I don't understand about that is that ACORN states they will submit everything, including the fraudulent registrations they've received.
They then work with the government (state/federal) agencies to prosecute said registrations.
But because the republican party has decided to use them as 'an issue' against Obama, they're evil incarnate. When you can find instances of the republican party attending & helping acorn as well. It's not like if you're a minority and/or poor you're voting democrat automagically.
Also, even if a fraudulent card is turned in, the first time a person tries to vote against it requires identification, and a utility bill in some states if not all of them.
So fake name/shaving your beard Gangs of NY style isn't going to cut it...no pun intended.
How often do hybrid batteries need replacing? Is replacement expensive and disposal an environmental problem?
The hybrid battery packs are designed to last for the lifetime of the vehicle, somewhere between 150,000 and 200,000 miles, probably a whole lot longer. The warranty covers the batteries for between eight and ten years, depending on the carmaker.
Battery toxicity is a concern, although today's hybrids use NiMH batteries, not the environmentally problematic rechargeable nickel cadmium. "Nickel metal hydride batteries are benign. They can be fully recycled," says Ron Cogan, editor of the Green Car Journal. Toyota and Honda say that they will recycle dead batteries and that disposal will pose no toxic hazards. Toyota puts a phone number on each battery, and they pay a $200 "bounty" for each battery to help ensure that it will be properly recycled.
There's no definitive word on replacement costs because they are almost never replaced. According to Toyota, since the Prius first went on sale in 2000, they have not replaced a single battery for wear and tear.
Disclaimer, I work for IBM, just me talking though not IBM.
Typically you'll see some type of parallel processing job that is schedule across part or all of the cluster depending on the data needed. Usually the maui scheduler is used to schedule the jobs and what not.
What they use on these jobs is basically a bunch of math. What the end result is depends on what the math is they asked it to do. Jobs can last several hours to several weeks.
Unless something changes it's tailes you loose, heads you loose. They will never release control even if the system forces them to open.
I tried a cable card in a TV that had one. It *never* worked and I just gave up, it wasn't worth it.
That being said, I dumped time warner and went to DirecTV. You're just as screwed by them as you are teh cable company, except when it rains with any volume you loose all signal and step 2 in troubleshooting is to erase the DVR and start over, even if you have three weeks of television on it they refuse to talk to you about it unless you format it.
I got three free months of service out of that one. But still, if you want to watch TV unless something changes (and I hope Revision3 and shows like Stranger Things or Dr. Horrible) and I can get the content on my TV via a butt simple device and bypass these fags.
Of course that's why they do your internet now, so you have to still get your 'content' from them, and they can still treat you like shit.
I don't like the way it works, but when you have a family four living off a reasonable income and you don't like spending copious amounts of money, things 'good enough' unfortunately win when the economics of the 'cool one' don't.
Yes, TiVo's are awesome. Unless they break, then you have to fix it. 'Fix' sometimes = Buy a new one.
Time Warners box costs $6.95 or whatever a month. It'd take you 43 months to pay $299 that say a TiVo costs (ok not all do, but I'm doing the HD dual tuner model)
When has one TiVo stayed on the market for 43 months without a new model with new features?
At time warner, I get a new one if a new functionality/feature comes out, and if it breaks, I get a new one no questions asked (barring 'why does this look like it was beat with a hammer' kind of thing)
oh, did TiVo stop charging monthly too? I quit using one about two years ago. yes you can buy the one time thing I think, but again that's a good chunk of money.
Having had a TiVo Break, or a new version come out within 43 months of purchase, I can say that to me the time warner deal isn't that bad.
Strange, I'm the opposite. My web/mail host filters using a barracuda appliance and I mark any false positives and trash the rest. It used to be 100 emails a day, this morning and the last few mornings it has been 8 a day.
Hi. I am an outer space fanboy. Since I was a small child I repeatedly copied maps of the solar system, drew them by hand, red the five or six pages about NASA in my World Book encyclopedia until the pages were tattered, manually typed (using a manual typewriter) out those pages out on paper because I was worried I'd lose them.
In 8th grade, weeks before the challenger exploded we were taught how to write resumes and were supposed to write one 30 years from now. I had references that lived on Mars, all sorts of stupid shit.
I wanted to be an astronaut as a child, things changed as I got older and I became a computer geek and server admin/solution designer instead.
But deep down inside that space geek is still alive, still wanting to be out there.
However the dream keeps dying, all you have to do is watch anything about the manned missions. This last round of stuff from Discovery Channel, you watch Mercury, Gemini, Apollo.
They certainly glamorize it, at least listening to the interviews of the actual astronauts who are looking back at it compared to the shuttle missions which look like political fighting run amok where instead of someone dying because you were rushing they were dying because no one wanted to look bad (Challenger, Columbia)
This just seems like another example of NASA going from the thing every little boy and girl dreams of doing to another example of the decay of base education in the states.
So yeah I'm having a crappy day anyway so I'm pretty pessimistic at the moment, but after reading several different versions of articles on this it seems to me that what you have here is a revolt going on where the smart guys are saying do it this way and look we can build on what we've been doing for decades vs. someone wanting to build a legacy of something all new and shiny.
To me the 5 years between the shuttle retiring and this new projecting moving forward this is a travesty to me. but that's the 'i want to live in space' fanboy talking, not the pessimistic mid thirties person talking.
I was wondering why you worked so hard to make a sphere when maybe a cube would be easier? (if it's not forgive me for being dumb, but I don't remember being told making a cube was harder than a sphere)
Kodos: Itâ(TM)s true, we are aliens. But what are you going to do about it? Itâ(TM)s a two-party system; you have to vote for one of us. [murmurs] Man1: Heâ(TM)s right, this is a two-party system. Man2: Well, I believe Iâ(TM)ll vote for a third-party candidate. Kang: Go ahead, throw your vote away!
The summaries inability to do what it's supposed to do, that is Summarize, this is a whole lot of posturing about nothing.
Do No Evil.
Great stupid internet-y slogan from the 90s when people were throwing more money than sense at sock puppets and the like.
Sure, it sounds cool and all, but then what is evil?
In China, Evil is questioning the state in anyway, or practicing Falon Gong (sorry if I spelled that wrong). If you're living in China, that's the law.
So just because you started your little company in a country which considers that 'weird' does it make you evil to comply with the law of the land? or do you force your law of the land on the other land? Which is more evil? OK, so because we view their law as Evil it's Evil? Why aren't our laws evil ? Just because groupthink says 'they're good'?
This case in India smacks of the same thing. The summary missed the boat about it being some indian god, instead, it was railing against some politician he hated.
While in the United States it's OK to call your sitting president 'Slick Willy' or 'Chimpy McFlightsuit' but in India apparently it's not so hot. A legal enforcement agency of that country requested/demanded/court ordered their way into finding out information and used to it to apply their laws towards that person.
That's evil?
Evil to me is a little different.
Crazy Boyfriend knocks on door, asks buddy that works at google to give him detailed information on where his ex-girlfriend is at, he finds her, and kills her.
Crazy Stalker Guy knocks on door, gets buddy to give up where britney spears is at based on her technology usage, he finds her, and strangles & kills her.
Those are the kind of Evil I think we're talking about, not the 'apply what I think are better laws towards other countries because I don't agree with them'.
It's called 'business'. If you want to operate in a given country, your home countries rules don't apply.
yeah sure google makes a great target now for putting that in their corporate details but also, Evil in one location isn't equal to evil in another location.
What really surprises me is that people on slashdot.org aren't cheering for the demise of Flash. A proprietary, closed, you have to buy our software to develop on language is being told to fuck off in favor of an open, anyone can develop for without any cost language (Flash vs. HTML5)
Is this bizzaro world? Last I checked I had to buy a closed source software package to be able to write a flash app. Mind you, I've never done that so I might be wrong and forgive me if I am.
If this was about the policies of the store or something else, I'd understand. But this is about the support of an open architecture against a for-fee architecture.
And on top of that, it keeps people from playing fucking farmville or evony. Win win.
How about you solve some other real problems first before getting all rabble rabble about a video codec?
That's the real issue as to why people don't care. You're not going to fire up your average internet user about the evils of that h.264 code shackled by patents. To them, the shackling is non-existent because they don't get a monthly bill for it. Claiming it's part of the OS and the the OS they got with their computer would have made it magically cheaper unless you're talking hundreds of dollars no one is going to care.
The only thing the mozilla group's stand about not supporting h.264 does for me is mean I skip using the browser because it's just stupid. It's one thing to not have the codec 'built in' but if my computer already has a legally licensed h.264 decoder your piddly ass browser stopping me from using it because you want to 'make a stand' is retarded.
I've long felt that silly things like this is what holds open source software back from mainstream assistance. It's just a personal view and you can disagree all you like and try to educate me to your view, but in the end, it's not worth the effort put into it because there are better things to worry about.
'humanity's dependency on a few, often secretive, organisations'? Please, eye roll smiley face here. That's the most ridiculous thing ever. YOUR H.264 CODEC IS MADE BY THE ILLUMINATI!!11!! it just looks crazy and people will ignore it and yet another thing goes down the tubes.
Verizon is Different from ABC and Cablevision how?
This assumes that RAID controller manufacturers won't be making any changes though.
RAID for years has relied on millisecond access times. So why spend a lot of money on an ASIC & Subsystem that can go faster? So taking a RAID card designed for slow (relatively) spinning disks and attaching them to SSD of course the RAID card is going to be a bottleneck.
However subsystems are going to be designed to work with SSD that has much higher access times. When that happens, this so called 'bottleneck' is gone. You know every major disk subsystem vendor is working on these. Sounds like a disk vendor is sponsoring 'studies' to convince people not to invest in SSD technologies now knowing that a lot of companies are looking at big purchases this year because of the age of equipment after the downturn.
Keep in mind the new player changes it's better to train up stuff to 1m skill points and then add the learning skills later.
Learning skills only work if you're around more than 90d or so. Before that, if you get frustrated and quit the learning skills only accelerate that process.
Sounds like you tried to join an elite pee vee pee alliance and not one that actually understands how to play the game.
A two day old character in a rifter can make a huge difference in a fight. People who say otherwise are clueless. The larger alliances (that are competent) keep rifters around and give them out like candy from a van. yes they can die fast but still the can lock faster on those big expensive ships and ruin their day. Yes, there are bigger & shiner ships out there when you don't care if you lose your ship because it costs you nothing, and in fact makes you isk by insurance payments for the lost ship, you are much more gung ho about killing things and getting a 'tackle' (stopping a ship from warping) on those big ships that people who have played for years with.
That tackle is enough for the other guys in your corp to get a stronger hold and to melt the guy however that two day old rifter made all the difference.
As an old Goonfleet motto said: My Ship Cost Less than your ammunition, My modules were picked off rats, I don't even know if my guns are loaded, and I'm about to ruin your life.
As far as penalty driven PvP and PvE (your ship goes boom, no getting it back, and stuff you fit to your ship can go boom with it along with stuff you were carrying)
Owning space regions is expensive & cumbersome, but to be honest I don't remember the housing mechanic real well but it's similar. You can own a Station as well has have Towers referred to as 'POS' (Player Owned Stations)
anything outside of account stealing and real money stealing is allowed and not reversed.
But you're not an elf running around casting things, you're in a space ship.
i'm completely skeptical the meteor hit him before hitting the ground. I'd me more inclined to agree he got nailed by something flying back at him that was hot. Wouldn't the kinetic energy transfer into the ground heat it up enough to burn the skin slightly as it hit you? I would think he'd lose that hand if not his life if he got hit by a rock that was going fast enough/had enough mass to drive a crater like that after striking him first
i know i've watched a ton of movies and my view of physics has been warped since I was in school but it just doesn't seem possible to be physically hit by something, and the energy not transferring to you, and still have enough to punch that kind of hole in the ground.
don't forget the robot dude that you could pop the face off of to prove he wasn't really steve austin.
my parents never bought me any of those. I had about three star wars figures total, and two transformers.
Because the following will happen:
1) Someone will take a crayon to the screen
2) If they have siblings, it will get yanked off table while they fight over keyboard
3) it'll sit there, hardly ever used, until they either figure out how to watch movies on it (DVDs) or get old enough to use it.
Really under the age of four you should play on the computer with them, not let them have one. There are always exceptions to that but until three/four years of age their dexterity and fine motor control can't handle a mouse, and the keyboard is just something you beat on instead of recognizing the letters.
the thing that I don't understand about that is that ACORN states they will submit everything, including the fraudulent registrations they've received.
They then work with the government (state/federal) agencies to prosecute said registrations.
But because the republican party has decided to use them as 'an issue' against Obama, they're evil incarnate. When you can find instances of the republican party attending & helping acorn as well. It's not like if you're a minority and/or poor you're voting democrat automagically.
Also, even if a fraudulent card is turned in, the first time a person tries to vote against it requires identification, and a utility bill in some states if not all of them.
So fake name/shaving your beard Gangs of NY style isn't going to cut it...no pun intended.
Stolen from Hybridcars.com:
How often do hybrid batteries need replacing? Is replacement expensive and disposal an environmental problem?
The hybrid battery packs are designed to last for the lifetime of the vehicle, somewhere between 150,000 and 200,000 miles, probably a whole lot longer. The warranty covers the batteries for between eight and ten years, depending on the carmaker.
Battery toxicity is a concern, although today's hybrids use NiMH batteries, not the environmentally problematic rechargeable nickel cadmium. "Nickel metal hydride batteries are benign. They can be fully recycled," says Ron Cogan, editor of the Green Car Journal. Toyota and Honda say that they will recycle dead batteries and that disposal will pose no toxic hazards. Toyota puts a phone number on each battery, and they pay a $200 "bounty" for each battery to help ensure that it will be properly recycled.
There's no definitive word on replacement costs because they are almost never replaced. According to Toyota, since the Prius first went on sale in 2000, they have not replaced a single battery for wear and tear.
Disclaimer, I work for IBM, just me talking though not IBM.
Typically you'll see some type of parallel processing job that is schedule across part or all of the cluster depending on the data needed. Usually the maui scheduler is used to schedule the jobs and what not.
What they use on these jobs is basically a bunch of math. What the end result is depends on what the math is they asked it to do. Jobs can last several hours to several weeks.
Unless something changes it's tailes you loose, heads you loose. They will never release control even if the system forces them to open.
I tried a cable card in a TV that had one. It *never* worked and I just gave up, it wasn't worth it.
That being said, I dumped time warner and went to DirecTV. You're just as screwed by them as you are teh cable company, except when it rains with any volume you loose all signal and step 2 in troubleshooting is to erase the DVR and start over, even if you have three weeks of television on it they refuse to talk to you about it unless you format it.
I got three free months of service out of that one. But still, if you want to watch TV unless something changes (and I hope Revision3 and shows like Stranger Things or Dr. Horrible) and I can get the content on my TV via a butt simple device and bypass these fags.
Of course that's why they do your internet now, so you have to still get your 'content' from them, and they can still treat you like shit.
I don't like the way it works, but when you have a family four living off a reasonable income and you don't like spending copious amounts of money, things 'good enough' unfortunately win when the economics of the 'cool one' don't.
There are two sides to this coin though.
Yes, TiVo's are awesome. Unless they break, then you have to fix it. 'Fix' sometimes = Buy a new one.
Time Warners box costs $6.95 or whatever a month. It'd take you 43 months to pay $299 that say a TiVo costs (ok not all do, but I'm doing the HD dual tuner model)
When has one TiVo stayed on the market for 43 months without a new model with new features?
At time warner, I get a new one if a new functionality/feature comes out, and if it breaks, I get a new one no questions asked (barring 'why does this look like it was beat with a hammer' kind of thing)
oh, did TiVo stop charging monthly too? I quit using one about two years ago. yes you can buy the one time thing I think, but again that's a good chunk of money.
Having had a TiVo Break, or a new version come out within 43 months of purchase, I can say that to me the time warner deal isn't that bad.
Strange, I'm the opposite. My web/mail host filters using a barracuda appliance and I mark any false positives and trash the rest. It used to be 100 emails a day, this morning and the last few mornings it has been 8 a day.
Almost every Marine Aquarium enthusiast with half a brain.
It's always in big print in all the materials if you want anything prettier than nemo.
Hi. I am an outer space fanboy. Since I was a small child I repeatedly copied maps of the solar system, drew them by hand, red the five or six pages about NASA in my World Book encyclopedia until the pages were tattered, manually typed (using a manual typewriter) out those pages out on paper because I was worried I'd lose them.
In 8th grade, weeks before the challenger exploded we were taught how to write resumes and were supposed to write one 30 years from now. I had references that lived on Mars, all sorts of stupid shit.
I wanted to be an astronaut as a child, things changed as I got older and I became a computer geek and server admin/solution designer instead.
But deep down inside that space geek is still alive, still wanting to be out there.
However the dream keeps dying, all you have to do is watch anything about the manned missions. This last round of stuff from Discovery Channel, you watch Mercury, Gemini, Apollo.
They certainly glamorize it, at least listening to the interviews of the actual astronauts who are looking back at it compared to the shuttle missions which look like political fighting run amok where instead of someone dying because you were rushing they were dying because no one wanted to look bad (Challenger, Columbia)
This just seems like another example of NASA going from the thing every little boy and girl dreams of doing to another example of the decay of base education in the states.
So yeah I'm having a crappy day anyway so I'm pretty pessimistic at the moment, but after reading several different versions of articles on this it seems to me that what you have here is a revolt going on where the smart guys are saying do it this way and look we can build on what we've been doing for decades vs. someone wanting to build a legacy of something all new and shiny.
To me the 5 years between the shuttle retiring and this new projecting moving forward this is a travesty to me. but that's the 'i want to live in space' fanboy talking, not the pessimistic mid thirties person talking.
reminds of the last unfunny news cast where you stood outside an apple store and asked the people in line if they'd ever seen a naked woman.
Ahh. duh. Ok thank you for explaining.
This is a serious question, not trolling.
I was wondering why you worked so hard to make a sphere when maybe a cube would be easier? (if it's not forgive me for being dumb, but I don't remember being told making a cube was harder than a sphere)
Kodos: Itâ(TM)s true, we are aliens. But what are you going to do about it? Itâ(TM)s a two-party system; you have to vote for one of us. [murmurs]
Man1: Heâ(TM)s right, this is a two-party system.
Man2: Well, I believe Iâ(TM)ll vote for a third-party candidate.
Kang: Go ahead, throw your vote away!
I often wondered if I was the only person to feel this way.
I thought he was a hero in 2000. Then, he proved me wrong from 2001 to 2008.
PayPal and Sharebuilder don't remove the money, I've used both of those.
I always hook up my three accounts I have, sure, I get less than $1.00 each time but feels like I'm fighting the man somehow.
The summaries inability to do what it's supposed to do, that is Summarize, this is a whole lot of posturing about nothing.
Do No Evil.
Great stupid internet-y slogan from the 90s when people were throwing more money than sense at sock puppets and the like.
Sure, it sounds cool and all, but then what is evil?
In China, Evil is questioning the state in anyway, or practicing Falon Gong (sorry if I spelled that wrong). If you're living in China, that's the law.
So just because you started your little company in a country which considers that 'weird' does it make you evil to comply with the law of the land? or do you force your law of the land on the other land? Which is more evil? OK, so because we view their law as Evil it's Evil? Why aren't our laws evil ? Just because groupthink says 'they're good'?
This case in India smacks of the same thing. The summary missed the boat about it being some indian god, instead, it was railing against some politician he hated.
While in the United States it's OK to call your sitting president 'Slick Willy' or 'Chimpy McFlightsuit' but in India apparently it's not so hot. A legal enforcement agency of that country requested/demanded/court ordered their way into finding out information and used to it to apply their laws towards that person.
That's evil?
Evil to me is a little different.
Crazy Boyfriend knocks on door, asks buddy that works at google to give him detailed information on where his ex-girlfriend is at, he finds her, and kills her.
Crazy Stalker Guy knocks on door, gets buddy to give up where britney spears is at based on her technology usage, he finds her, and strangles & kills her.
Those are the kind of Evil I think we're talking about, not the 'apply what I think are better laws towards other countries because I don't agree with them'.
It's called 'business'. If you want to operate in a given country, your home countries rules don't apply.
yeah sure google makes a great target now for putting that in their corporate details but also, Evil in one location isn't equal to evil in another location.