Slashdot Mirror


Where Has All My Spam Gone?

An anonymous reader writes "I have my own domain, which has its own email server, where I receive all my personal email. I've been getting about 800 emails a day, of which perhaps 20 are real. Suddenly, Sunday or Monday evening, the spam pretty much stopped. My volume of mail has plummeted to less than 100 a day, and as far as I can tell, I'm not missing any real mail — I'm still getting the email list subscriptions I'm expecting, and every time I ask someone to send me a test message, it gets through. My domain host insists that it doesn't do any spam filtering before mail gets to my inbox, and that they've changed nothing about their configuration. I run SpamAssassin on my server to mark, but not delete, spam, and download the whole mess to my home client, and I'm still seeing the occasional message tagged by SpamAssassin. But it's virtually all gone. And I haven't changed anything about my own mail configuration, or the harvestability of my site (my personal email has been harvestable for almost a decade). So what's going on? I can't believe that several major botnets would have vanished overnight. Any ideas?"

597 comments

  1. Hmm by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Informative

    *Checks mail logs*

    Yeh, you need to ask the ISP again. No sign of slowing here.

    1. Re:Hmm by urbanriot · · Score: 4, Informative

      Agreed. No changes in spam over here, my domain is still receiving the daily average of about 100 per day.

    2. Re:Hmm by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 5, Funny

      A group of the original SpamAssassin developers got together with a group of mercenaries and created SpammerAssassin. It's in alpha, and looks good except it seems to have started a teeny-tiny war in the eastern bloc. Oops. They have an open bug ticket on it.

      :D

    3. Re:Hmm by Southpaw018 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thirded over here. Solid 7000/day for months (small business).

      --
      ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    4. Re:Hmm by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Seriously though ... if spammers started turning up dead where would the police even begin their investigation? There's only a pool of what, half a billion suspects?

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    5. Re:Hmm by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Best post of the day.

      Thank you.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    6. Re:Hmm by twilightzero · · Score: 1

      I just have to say that your signature made me happy and planted the spores in my brain which have filled me with Juffo-Wup. This pleases us. :D

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    7. Re:Hmm by VenomPhallus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yup, and here; still getting 250 a day+ or so.

      Maybe they finally clicked that you've already got a huge penis and legendary bedroom performance?

    8. Re:Hmm by tha_mink · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps the botnets are busy fighting amongst themselves, vis a vis the Georgia v. Russia conflict.

      --
      You'll have that sometimes...
    9. Re:Hmm by im+just+cannonfodder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      all the USA spam servers are currently in use targeting Georgia so they can continue their anti-russia propaganda.

      Bush and the Georgia-Russia conflict

      http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/08/406684.html

    10. Re:Hmm by y86 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Agreed. No changes in spam over here, my domain is still receiving the daily average of about 100 per day.

      You should REALLY consider trying postgrey.

      http://postgrey.schweikert.ch/

      Postgrey on non whitelisted servers rejects the first mail attempt with a fail. The sending email server will retry X times, but the 2nd time it accepts it and adds the server to the whitelist.

      Postgrey will add a 5 minute lag to an email that's sending server has never sent an email to you. It's worth it to screw the spammers zombies over IMHO.

      Also, I would check your postfix/whatever you are using for a mail servers policy. I get 0 spam emails now and my address is posted all over the web.

      I do have spamassassin running as well with sieve filtering to put what is marked as spam in a junk folder but the junk folder is empty, every now and then I'll see something -- but very rarely. Like once every 2 months.

      Here's my spam prevention system :-)

      smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
          permit_mynetworks,
          permit_sasl_authenticated,
          reject_unauth_destination,
          reject_non_fqdn_sender,
          reject_unknown_sender_domain,
          reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
          reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
          reject_unauth_destination,
          reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
          reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
          check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:60000

    11. Re:Hmm by plymtuxet · · Score: 1

      So far today - 12,250 spams and 575 valid emails. Probably about 1/2 of the valid emails are actual business-related communication.

    12. Re:Hmm by jdray · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, I just checked one of my e-mail addresses that has historically gotten about a hundred a day, and the Spam bucket only has 26 for yesterday and similar numbers for the last couple of days.

      I read recently about some big spam king (czar, whatever) that got arrested. I wonder if taking him out of the equation actually had an effect on the world.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    13. Re:Hmm by skolima · · Score: 4, Funny

      +1 Insightful or +1 Funny? Tough call..

    14. Re:Hmm by smilindog2000 · · Score: 1, Funny

      My home e-mail, bill@billrocks.org, is also getting far less spam now for a couple weeks. It's posted all over the net, so I find that really strange. Maybe they realized I don't need a penal enlargement and don't want to meet women (I'm married)?

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
    15. Re:Hmm by Like2Byte · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps the botnets are busy fighting amongst themselves, vis a vis the Georgia v. Russia conflict.

      Ok, Agent Mulder, settle down.

    16. Re:Hmm by xtinct · · Score: 5, Interesting
      yeah, that guy got arrested & sentenced to minimum security prison.

      then he proceeded to escape, kill his wife & baby daughter (a teenager escaped) and then himself.

      pretty crazy, no?: http://www.dailycamera.com/news/2008/jul/26/spam-king-murder-suicide-surviving-daughter-in/

    17. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Russian spammers can't get bandwidth because the military is busy using it against Georgia.

    18. Re:Hmm by j-cloth · · Score: 5, Informative

      A huge second to PostGrey. It kills 90% of my incoming spam before it even touches spamassassin. However, I have noticed a few people who receive failure messages from their mail systems telling them that they've been greylisted before the mail goes through. Then uppy-ups whine to me.

    19. Re:Hmm by sexconker · · Score: 3, Funny

      Every single day I get 4 or 5 copies of the "Paypal Dispute Transaction" shit.

    20. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we'd begin by investigating YOU.

    21. Re:Hmm by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure... and when a big mafioso is killed, it's the small shop owners that are the suspects. Riiiiight. Find out who's running the botnet now, and you got your prime suspect.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    22. Re:Hmm by petermgreen · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use greylisting, it reduced spam to almost zero for a while but then it gradually climbed back to previous levels and more.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    23. Re:Hmm by swb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's something to that, even if the original poster's claim of not having spam anymore is local to him through unknown upstream changes.

      Its long been suspected that the Russian government and Russian organized crime have cooperative links, if not outright overlapping "membership" (Putin is FSA/KGB, and its well known that ex-KGB members have been deeply involved in the Russian Mafia).

      With this in mind, its not hard to speculate that if botnets controlled by Russian organized crime were put use against pro-Georgian assets, the ensuing defenses, publicity and exposure at the political/military level could possible cause these botnets to be far more vulnerable than they otherwise would be in the course of normal criminal activity.

      This higher level exposure might lead to weakening them and reduce their effectiveness at normal tasks like spam.

      Its also possible they may also be overutilized and prioritized for cyberwarfare and not for spam.

    24. Re:Hmm by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh ... so you're address is bill@billrocks.org? Interesting ...

    25. Re:Hmm by tnhtnh · · Score: 1

      I've love to see a change to the graph on http://postgrey.schweikert.ch/ The one the graphs spam and viruses over time. They should also graph the amount of legitimate email that comes in. Dont get me wrong, grey listing is great but unless you use your own MTA, you cannot guarantee the message will be retried. I strongly suggest using domainkeys, DKIM and SPF. Just reject against failures and accept everything else. It will be a great start.

    26. Re:Hmm by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not sure if we've exchanged comments before, but I have some genuine replica watches of the finest quality.

    27. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      it's YOUR not YOU'RE *shoots you*

    28. Re:Hmm by Wo1ke · · Score: 1

      If you are using Windows, Microsoft released an update to their spam filter last week.

    29. Re:Hmm by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, visit my Canadian Pharmacy online drugstore to choose from a great selection of products of high quality produced according to the strict pharmaceutical standards.

    30. Re:Hmm by JM78 · · Score: 1

      Not anymore... *1/2 billion fingers point in your direction*

      --
      I am Jack's smirking revenge.
    31. Re:Hmm by Fez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wanted to use greylisting here but the idea was shot down, as some people actually expect people to be nearly instantaneous and if it's not, they moan and groan.

      Doesn't matter how many times I try to explain that isn't how e-mail is supposed to work, that it's unreliable, etc, they still expect to hit send, then tell someone to check their mail 30 seconds later and it's there waiting.

      Spam seems to be fairly steady here, perhaps up a tad. Here's the Monthly graph from our main filter (not from that domain, FYI.)

    32. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Agreed. No changes in spam over here, my domain is still receiving the daily average of about 100 per day.

      You should REALLY consider trying postgrey.

      There are lots of good greylisting systems out there.

      And how do you know he isn't getting hundreds of spams a day even with greylisting? Many spammers are aware of greylisting and will retry.

    33. Re:Hmm by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      This may be closer to reality than you expect. If any of the major botnet controllers was in Georgia, Russia, or China, recent political events may have shut down their careless ISP where they operated from, or they may be being cautious with the increased cyber-monitoring in place there. Spam is not a problem of a few people, it's a problem of an ecological niche: but killing off the largest local members of that niche can leave a temporary void. It takes a bit of time to refill such a void.

      It may also be that the folks the original poster spoke to at his ISP don't actually know that their third-party SMTP service tools have recently enabled spam filtering on all their traffic: it's easy to change such a setting for an individual customer by accident when you provide it for others.

    34. Re:Hmm by King+Louie · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Or maybe they're taking part in the Georgia v. Russia conflict.

    35. Re:Hmm by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      Same again.

    36. Re:Hmm by DriedClexler · · Score: 5, Interesting

      After I read this article yesterday (single page), that's what I thought: given all the spammers that are Russian, there's a chance there might be a slowdown in spam as patriotic Russians "pitch in" by helping DDOS Georgian resources.

      It's pretty amazing if you read that article how easy it was for just an average person to find out how to "volunteer" for the Russian army: independent helpers have made it so you can find out which Georgian sites you should ping in order to maximize your effectiveness, and have programs that you can download that do most of the work with minimal hassle.

      However:

      a) According to most posters, spam hasn't actually abated.
      b) Spammers wouldn't do something as selfless as pitching in for their country.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    37. Re:Hmm by TTURabble · · Score: 5, Funny

      So Saakashvili is getting 100 emails a minute about pen1s enlargement?

    38. Re:Hmm by Amouth · · Score: 1

      we get about 180k a day worth of attempts

      99.99% of them get dropped

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    39. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just got a bounceback of one of these today. This breaks a lot of stuff, and a client we e-mailed did not get a time-sensitive e-mail he normally would have. It raises your support costs as you now have at least two admins and two users scratching their heads on initial emails.

    40. Re:Hmm by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      Canadian pharmacy guarantees you higher Slashdot score!

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    41. Re:Hmm by wmbetts · · Score: 5, Informative

      I use to read a lot of not so nice forums when I was really into Info Sec and I always heard them referred to as "The Russian Business Network"

      --
      "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". - stolen from Dan C alt.os.linux.slackware
    42. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd go more with 4 billion... people have multiple email addresses, so rather than being like ass holes, where everyone has one, it's more like fingers and toes where everyone outside of factory workers and persons with deformities would have around 20, 22, etc...

      In either situation, 500 million or 4 billion, the investigation would be impossible. Even if the scenario described in Superbad, where the body and all the walls, carpet, etc, were all covered in jizz (dna evidence), there would still be too many people's dna to link one to the murder. For a spammer, the future, is a very very sticky mess.

    43. Re:Hmm by Teun · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    44. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other organised crime outfits. They have the most to gain, knowledge of the underground and the will to use extreme violence. It already happens, in fact. Although sometimes it's just because they're not very careful in their choice of prostitutes.

    45. Re:Hmm by christianT · · Score: 4, Funny

      IIRC SpammerAssassin is built on JBASH (Jason Bourn Again Shell)

    46. Re:Hmm by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Greylisting have one main vulnerability. What if the software used to send the spam handles that temporary rejections and retries with the same ip, same from, same to? It dont targets spam per se, just targets badly behaved mail senders.

      In fact, the srizbi botnet (that used to generate more spam that all the other botnets together few months/weeks ago) handle those rejects, retries and end sending the spam.

      Maybe the "missing spam" problem is that greylisting was in use since long ago (but srizbi was making spam going thru) and happened something with this particular botnet, i.e. now it just focus in georgia, or the main controller got sick or arrested, and this particular source of spam dropped (and greylisting kept stopping the "normal" stupid enough spam).

      A good way to complement spam source filtering thru greylisting is to block home/dynamic IPs, ranges where mail servers arent supposed to be, but where are the majority of personal pcs (that gets owned by botnets). Spamhaus PBL i.e. have this particular target (or zen that combines this one with other known sources of spam)

    47. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran a report for the last two weeks:

      Approx. emails checked 13,705,010 100.00%
      Approx. emails blacklisted 13,532,825 97.35%
      Approx. emails whitelisted 14,843 0.11%
      Approx. emails passed check 157,342 1.13%
      Spam Rate - 98.85% ... so i'm going with "no slowdown here, either".

    48. Re:Hmm by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      No spam in three months. My e-mails are across two domains, and one particular address hasn't seen less than 100 spams a day until last year, when I made my own filters. Then only rarely a message slipped through.

      About a month before the spam completely stopped, I moved my domains' MXes over to SiteGround, and it stayed at less than 5 per week until three months ago.

    49. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      22? What an extra thumb and an extra pinky toe?

    50. Re:Hmm by protolith · · Score: 4, Funny

      is also getting far less spam now for a couple weeks

      I think that's about to change.

    51. Re:Hmm by denobug · · Score: 1

      My home e-mail, bill@billrocks.org, is also getting far less spam now for a couple weeks.

      Don't worry bud. you just posted your email address on /. You'll get your spam back as you have wished for... *Endless Evil Laughers follows*

    52. Re:Hmm by stevey · · Score: 2, Informative

      My mail filtering service is currently hovering around 2.3 million mails - which is a little down from its peak.

      Still these things tend to even out over time; a few days/weeks of lower-than-average SPAM totals then a few more of higher than average.

      With only a couple of domains, anecdotally at that, I'd be inclined to assume nothing has changed significantly.

    53. Re:Hmm by stevey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It depends on your setup - for directly mailed SPAM you could be correct.

      Me? I'm a Debian developer, so I get about 500 mails a day routed from the MX machine handling @debian.org.

      If it accepts SPAM then their MX will happily retry - end result is that greylisting on my side will accomplish nothing.

    54. Re:Hmm by Nathrael · · Score: 1

      +1 Insightful if you want to improve his karma. +1 Funny doesn't count for that as far I know.

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    55. Re:Hmm by ins0m · · Score: 1

      That's not a vulnerability. The entire point of greylisting is to catch the fire-and-forget spammers. It's about detecting half-baked SMTP implementations that can't handle deferrals.

      For the most part, greylisting + RBL + a heuristic scanner eats 98% of my spam. And for those bitching about time-sensitive data not getting across the wire in time:

      Greylisting is a one-time ordeal. If you're receiving email from someone you've _never_ had email correspondance with, it's going to happen. Three times deferred, then added to internal whitelist. Takes no more than half an hour.

      If you're running that far to the wire, I'd expect that you either: A. broke your fax machine, or B. can't get your act together to not run your business on the 11th hour.

      In either case, it's a human problem, not a technological one. Build a contingency for oh-shit, last-minute emergencies, and don't wait for the other shoe to drop before trying to rush something out.

      --
      Never attribute to Hanlon that which can be adequately attributed to Heinlein.
    56. Re:Hmm by dmoo · · Score: 1

      Got to recommend ASSP in front of your mailserver, it has all you need including greylisting, bayesian, whitelists etc. etc.

    57. Re:Hmm by smilindog2000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I know, pretty vain. I got it shortly after Bill Clinton was no longer president. The site sucks, but I post to my dumb ideas sometimes.

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
    58. Re:Hmm by jdmetz · · Score: 2, Informative

      A good way to complement spam source filtering thru greylisting is to block home/dynamic IPs, ranges where mail servers arent supposed to be, but where are the majority of personal pcs (that gets owned by botnets). Spamhaus PBL i.e. have this particular target (or zen that combines this one with other known sources of spam)

      Please don't. There is no reason that mail servers shouldn't exist on home/dynamic IP addresses. This is one area where I'm actually happy with my AT&T DSL service - they block outbound port 25 connections by default, but allow you to opt out of the blocking if you want to run your own mail server.

    59. Re:Hmm by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Spammers wouldn't do something as selfless as pitching in for their country.

      Who says it's selfless? Maybe they cut a deal with Putin where they attack Georgian computers, and Putin doesn't enforce any laws they might be violating by spamming and phishing.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    60. Re:Hmm by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Mine has changed, its increased.

      My domain gets an average of 10000 a day now, and its really beginning to piss me off.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    61. Re:Hmm by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      Strange, I'm the opposite. My web/mail host filters using a barracuda appliance and I mark any false positives and trash the rest. It used to be 100 emails a day, this morning and the last few mornings it has been 8 a day.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    62. Re:Hmm by smilindog2000 · · Score: 1

      Googling "billrocks.org site:slashdot.org" returns 139 hits. I only let through white-listed e-mail. It does slow down my e-mail retrieval, though. I daily get more spam than anyone I ever heard of. I have one theory for why it's slowed down. I have to use dnsmadeeasy.com to get past AT&T's mail port blocking. Maybe they started grey-listing. The stuff coming through looks like it's spam from real sights, not spam-bots.

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
    63. Re:Hmm by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      If your assertion that Russian organized crime were put to use against pro-Georgian assets is correct, then the US should be seeing an INCREASE rather than decrease in spam.

      Oh wait, which side was the US on again?

    64. Re:Hmm by mrdoogee · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not to mention I'm H0m3 tonight, a1on3 waiting 4 U. Come se my pages at ispam@spammer.net

    65. Re:Hmm by skolima · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know that - but I had no mod points available, and responding to a post increases it's chances of getting upmoded :-)

    66. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-August/msg00008.html

      "The Fedora Infrastructure team is currently investigating an issue in
      the infrastructure systems. That process may result in service outages,
      for which we apologize in advance. We're still assessing the end-user
      impact of the situation, but as a precaution, we recommend you not
      download or update any additional packages on your Fedora systems."

      Now I know what the above ominous but cryptic message means. The Fedora Infrastructure is being used a a huge spam botnet!

    67. Re:Hmm by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      A good way to complement spam source filtering thru greylisting is to block home/dynamic IPs, ranges where mail servers arent supposed to be, but where are the majority of personal pcs (that gets owned by botnets). Spamhaus PBL i.e. have this particular target (or zen that combines this one with other known sources of spam)

      Please don't. There is no reason that mail servers shouldn't exist on home/dynamic IP addresses.

      Actually, there is one, at least as far as the dynamic IP goes. Allowing servers that move around opens up the door to all sorts of shadiness. You wouldn't keep your money in a bank that changed the address of its corporate office every 3 weeks.

      If it's that important to you to run your own mailserver, either get a static IP (not bad on embarq DSL, +$5-10/mo, shitty on comcast +$75-100/mo) or use a smarthost. That's why they exist.

    68. Re:Hmm by Dark_Gravity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A good way to complement spam source filtering thru greylisting is to block home/dynamic IPs, ranges where mail servers arent supposed to be, but where are the majority of personal pcs (that gets owned by botnets). Spamhaus PBL i.e. have this particular target (or zen that combines this one with other known sources of spam)

      Please don't. There is no reason that mail servers shouldn't exist on home/dynamic IP addresses. This is one area where I'm actually happy with my AT&T DSL service - they block outbound port 25 connections by default, but allow you to opt out of the blocking if you want to run your own mail server.

      I disagree. If you want to run an outbound MTA, get a static IP and some reverse DNS. While not having those two things doesn't prove you incompetent, having them indicates that you may have a clue as to what you are doing.

      With the unfathomable amount of zombie machines on dynamic consumer IP ranges, there is no reason for me to absorb the spam just to allow you to be cheap and lazy. If you can't be bothered to show some signs of being clueful, why should anyone be bothered to accept your email?

      If you can't bring yourself to get a static IP with non-generic rDNS, you can always use a smarthost. Barring those two sensible options, I suspect most postmasters would view not delivering your MTA's emails as lossless compression.

    69. Re:Hmm by BPPG · · Score: 1

      Just like it says beside his name, shown without obfuscation. ;-)

      --
      What's the value of information that you don't know?
    70. Re:Hmm by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Greylisting is a one-time ordeal. If you're receiving email from someone you've _never_ had email correspondance with, it's going to happen. Three times deferred, then added to internal whitelist. Takes no more than half an hour.

      The reason I eventually gave up on greylisting is because it turns out that most of the time when I want to receive email from someone I've never communicated with before, I particularly want it promptly.

      The most obvious case is signing up on new web sites that require confirmation of a received email before activation. When I actually go to the trouble of signing up for a web site, it's because I want to do something right then, not in half an hour. It was when I was in a foreign country trying to buy a train ticket online with just an hour to spare that I finally abandoned the whole thing.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    71. Re:Hmm by cjewel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they finally clicked that you've already got a huge penis and legendary bedroom performance?

      If so, could I have your number, southpaw? (A Female slashdotter)

    72. Re:Hmm by raju1kabir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unfortunately we live in an age where some sort of accountability is necessary before I'll accept your email. A dynamic IP address means no accountability, and it means your email doesn't get through.

      As far as I can tell, the only people still self-delivering email from dynamic IP addresses are hobbyists who collect knives and home-school their kids, and whom neither I nor any of my clients have ever wanted to correspond with. I have never once received a report of email delivery problems that traced back to dynamic-IP blacklisting.

      Don't get me wrong - when I first got DSL in 1999 I was thrilled about running my own mail server in the hall closet and did so for years. But times changed and I changed with them.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    73. Re:Hmm by digitalgiblet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps the botnets are busy fighting amongst themselves, vis a vis the Georgia v. Russia conflict.

      Ok, Agent Mulder, settle down.

      I Want To Believe...

    74. Re:Hmm by bitspotter · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean the Russian military can't get bandwidth because the spammers are busy using it against Georgia?

      This is //Soviet Russia//, after all...

    75. Re:Hmm by HeavyDevelopment · · Score: 3, Funny

      OMG that was funny....

      --
      Badges!?! We don't need no stinking badges!
    76. Re:Hmm by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's a nice theory, but in practice, I have seen a huge increase in spam recently. Mostly CNN and MSNBC News Alerts that require me to download an updated version of Adobe Flash Player.

    77. Re:Hmm by rat10178 · · Score: 1

      *Checks mail logs*

      Yeh, you need to ask the ISP again. No sign of slowing here.

      I wonder if the Russians shooting up the joint has some bearing on the spam bot control system. Mine has dropped down to two a day at most. And I'm using Comcast no less.

    78. Re:Hmm by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Me too. It makes me quite glad that the only credit card I ever gave PayPal has since expired.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    79. Re:Hmm by Soruk · · Score: 0, Troll

      You must be new here. This is Slashdot.

      --
      -- Soruk
    80. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they just decided to take the week off.

    81. Re:Hmm by swb · · Score: 1

      I would agree that spam has stayed the same or spiked somewhat, but its also possible that use of criminal networks in pursuit of Russian foreign policy still may weaken those networks in the short term.

    82. Re:Hmm by Lazyrust · · Score: 5, Funny
      I would be happy to purchase those genuine watches but first I would need your assistance in moving a large sum of money out of the country of Nigeria. It seems that a rich uncle of mine has passed away this year and unfortunately his wife is unable to accept the money due to governmental restrictions. Therefore, if you would be willing in assisting me in transferring the sum of $5,000,000,000,000,000.00 I will be happy to give you 10% in return for your time and effort. In addition I will purchase all of your fine genuine replica watches of the highest quality. In addition, I will be in need of a great selection of products of high quality from your canadian pharmacy online drug store. Therefore, if you would be willing to send me your name, address, bank name and account number via email, I will be able to begin processing this information with his bank and will contact you shortly by international certified mail.

      Thank you for your time.

    83. Re:Hmm by mea37 · · Score: 3, Funny

      But in Soviet Russia, bandwidth gets you!

    84. Re:Hmm by swb · · Score: 1

      My guess is its much deeper -- they get to operate against Western targets, but both kick back to Putin's favorite charity and are answerable to the FSB on an as-needed basis.

      And it might even be that the whole thing is an FSB black op. Its not too hard to believe that Putin's figured out that it only makes sense to "control" crime by turning it into a kind of side business for the FSB. It's not like the CIA and the American Italian mafia didn't get involved in joint operations vis-a-vis Castro and drug running.

    85. Re:Hmm by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I use to read a lot of not so nice forums when I was really into Info Sec and I always heard them referred to as "The Russian Business Network"

      Got any links to those forums?

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    86. Re:Hmm by boss_hog · · Score: 1

      "they got punk-buster, I got punk-buster buster!" -- The Big Hit

      total B movie, but I have this strange man-crush on Mark Wahlberg's acting career.

    87. Re:Hmm by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      Are you referring to AT&T blocking outgoing port 25 connections? If you file a ticket on the support website there's an option to have that removed. I did it as soon as they instated it.

    88. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, visit my Canadian Pharmacy online drugstore to choose from a great selection of products of high quality produced according to the strict pharmaceutical standards.

      You guys are too funny, need to get together and do a skit or something

    89. Re:Hmm by theCat · · Score: 1

      FTW that was epic funny. Nominated for Slashdot Top 100 Most Funny and Topical Posts Evar.

      --
      =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    90. Re:Hmm by oneal13rru · · Score: 1, Funny

      Who has more oil? Assume we plan to invade tomorrow, regardless of whose side we're on, on grounds of them possibly using weapons they might have.

      --
      Never disregard the raw power inherent to stupidity... they call it "dumb luck" for a reason...
    91. Re:Hmm by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      My number - sure. It is 69.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    92. Re:Hmm by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I have 3 main addresses and one has dropped from 30 a day to maybe 5, a second blipped down as well but is going back up again and the third (an alias I can't get rid of) gets everything routed to the bin anyway so I don't know.

      Still, spam has almost died on my main address. No complaints here.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    93. Re:Hmm by MadCow42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      >>Every single day I get 4 or 5 copies of the "Paypal Dispute Transaction" shit.

      If you'd just ship me those darn pills I ordered, I wouldn't have to dispute the PayPal transactions!!!

      If this is all about the $7.29 shipping fee I still owe you, then just send me your bank account details and I'll send you the money by wire transfer instead. :)

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    94. Re:Hmm by rawg · · Score: 1
      Pretty consistent here.

      Jun 2008 155071 3.37 GB
      Jul 2008 171876 4.44 GB
      Aug 2008 93062 2.47 GB

      --
      The above is not worth reading.
    95. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Very few spammers actually retry for a few reasons:

      1. It's expensive. This is one of the strengths of greylisting. It is more expensive for the sender than the recipient.

      2. Greylisting indicates an administrator with a reasonable level of spam awareness. Chances are fair that your spam will never be seen by anyone on that server anyway.

      3. Relatively few places greylist.

    96. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps you actually tried one of their products.

      they surely must have some sort of cartel agreement to stop posting once you finally made a purchase.

    97. Re:Hmm by luke923 · · Score: 1

      Or, maybe the Chinese took time off from spamming to watch the Olympics.

      --
      "Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two" -- RFC 1925
    98. Re:Hmm by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      I'll be glad to help you move that large sum of money as long as you sign up to one of my websites that features girls with farm animals.

    99. Re:Hmm by magicchex · · Score: 1

      I've all of a sudden got these fake CNN news alerts too in the last couple weeks.

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    100. Re:Hmm by Lazyrust · · Score: 1

      Deal!

    101. Re:Hmm by orclevegam · · Score: 3, Informative

      Russian Business Network, or RBN, just happens to be one of the largest mafia run botnets/spam organizations. Seeing as the mafia more or less runs the government over there, it's a semi-legal (as in, no one's going to realistically prosecute them) business that operates a massive for-hire botnet. It's not the only one over there, but it is the biggest and most visible one, so a lot of russian botnet activity just gets labeled as RBN.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    102. Re:Hmm by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its long been suspected that the Russian government and Russian organized crime have cooperative links, if not outright overlapping "membership"

      What is a government anyway but the most successful group of thugs imaginable?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    103. Re:Hmm by Hugonz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are they fake? I got them too.

      The subscribe links point to the real CNN sites and they actually gave me no error when I tried to unsubscribe. They kept coming though.

      Hugo

    104. Re:Hmm by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      In America, spam sent by Russian Spammers gets deleted.
      In Soviet Russia Russian Spammers get deleted.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    105. Re:Hmm by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      As far as I can tell, the only people still self-delivering email from dynamic IP addresses are hobbyists who collect knives and home-school their kids

      Now there's an intriguing new stereotype!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    106. Re:Hmm by magicchex · · Score: 1

      Look at the sender's address.

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    107. Re:Hmm by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just download it already. Then they will stop bothering you. :)

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    108. Re:Hmm by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I hadn't seen the full story from the daughter, I'd only heard that a teenager lived but the wife and daughter were killed. I didn't even know the girl who lived was his daughter.

      Also, she apparently had a baby brother who was unharmed.

      Also, the comments in the link to the full story are retarded. "It says the 3-year old was shot but then says the infant lived? I don't get it!" A 3 year old isn't an infant, morons...

      Anyway... Terrible tragedy.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    109. Re:Hmm by KillerBob · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unfair moderation much? I hope you get metamodded back into positive, because that post is definitely not a troll. :(

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    110. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative!?!!?

    111. Re:Hmm by epee1221 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So, something of a modernized letter of marque?

      --
      "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
    112. Re:Hmm by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      And maybe a new Windows update took care of the bots installed on some machines and the spammers had to spend time cracking the new Windows to get their bots to work again?

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    113. Re:Hmm by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

            yeah, mine has been getting worse last few days, today is bigger than ever.

            nothing like 800 though.

        rd

    114. Re:Hmm by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      So tell me, who decides that you're running in a dynamic ip space?

      It isn't you and it isn't necessarily your ISP either.

      It's a funny thing, and you should ask SORBS about it before getting to clenched up about email coming from a 'dynamic' IP.

    115. Re:Hmm by binaryspiral · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would be a great movie... old cold war era tanks and soldiers vs. rednecks in pickup trucks with equal firepower...

      And a corrupt sheriff in there somewhere...

    116. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't ATT letting you say, OK, I need to send email directly without it hitting your servers, and them allowing you to do so. The problem is asshats like Comcast, RoadRunner, speedynet.br allowing everyone's infected shit to spew spam anywhere in the world.

    117. Re:Hmm by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Its also possible they may also be overutilized and prioritized for cyberwarfare and not for spam.

      Perhaps the poster lucked out and all the machines that had his addresses were in the portion of the botnet that was retargeted against Georgia.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    118. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Why reading in a forum, go to St. Petersburg and take a loot at one of their offices. It isn't as if nobody would know what they do and where they are... It's like at this conference last year, where European service providers met their Russian colleagues. When the Europeans asked for the spam problem, the Russian answer simply was: "We have no problem with spam, it earns us a lot of money."

    119. Re:Hmm by HeavyDevelopment · · Score: 2

      Dude they got you too. Watch this get modded Troll as well :)

      --
      Badges!?! We don't need no stinking badges!
    120. Re:Hmm by Dan541 · · Score: 2

      what's the difference?

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    121. Re:Hmm by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Running a mail server of a dynamic IP address!

      I can't think of a better way to get flagged as a spam source.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    122. Re:Hmm by raddan · · Score: 1

      I use something similar: OpenBSD's spamd. The caveat is that, rarely, legitimate mail is rejected. At work, typically the person on the other end will contact us some other way, and we'll whitelist them. Yahoo is the one egregious offender here; their relays never retry from the same box, so spamd thinks that it's a new connection and starts the connection count over again. But I've found, in general, that the false positive rate with spamd alone is lower than the false positive rate with SpamAssassin alone, and that OpenBSD's spamd is far more effective in general. The only "spam" we see now is the stuff that users signed up for; mailing lists, mostly. Stuff that-- back when we were using Bayesian filters-- users would classify as spam and foul up the the spam pool for the Bayes engine.

    123. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Bank Account number, right?

    124. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU'RE has an E and a '

    125. Re:Hmm by dorzak · · Score: 1

      Its long been suspected that the Russian government and Russian organized crime have cooperative links, if not outright overlapping "membership" (Putin is FSA/KGB, and its well known that ex-KGB members have been deeply involved in the Russian Mafia).

      What is the difference between taxes and mafia extortion/protection rackets?

      The law.

      If you don't pay extortion/protection, they send people with guns to take away your property.

      You don't pay your taxes, they come and take away your property.

    126. Re:Hmm by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      I use the Spamhaus PBL which is mostly populated by the ISPs responsible for the listed address ranges. If there are false positives, they have been rare enough not to come to my attention, as I said before.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    127. Re:Hmm by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      I've had times where I'd be getting 10 or so a day, and then they'd immediately stop.
      I figured it was somebody's spambot computer being cleaned up.
      On my spams now, my address is always around 2 others (alphabetically in order).

    128. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU'RE means YOU ARE.

      dumbass

    129. Re:Hmm by F34nor · · Score: 1

      3 year are technically too old to be toddlers. Infants are not capable of thermo-regulation, self feeding, or locomotion. Toddlers are learning to walk with toddling gait.

    130. Re:Hmm by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I don't believe you, your English was way too good.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    131. Re:Hmm by bhiestand · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe they finally clicked that you've already got a huge penis and legendary bedroom performance?

      If so, could I have your number, southpaw? (A Female slashdotter)

      Don't let yourself be fooled. She's a slashdotter, she wants to know how you stopped the spam.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    132. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can fix that. Please post your email address here, so we may contact you. Oh, we also have other very interesting offers, you'll be thrilled to hear about them and so will your girlfriend/wife (just kidding, I know this is /. so everyone is single).

    133. Re:Hmm by dword · · Score: 1

      Lemme guess... when you registered, why asked for your email address?

    134. Re:Hmm by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      A little problem with that thing. I had a client that needed communication with a lot of countries. One of them was China.
      With Postgrey I lost that client, since a LOT of legit servers in China are not configured to work correctly, or retries come from another server(in case of yahoo.cn, that apparently have separate names for their MX'es), therefore the mail is permanently was stuck in temp greylist.
      So they got fed up of not receiving emails and moved away.
      Thanks, Postgrey!

    135. Re:Hmm by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      your sentance doesn't make much sense but my email address is pretty widely spread now. Mainly from my participation in mailing lists and the debian bugtracker.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    136. Re:Hmm by dword · · Score: 1

      Lemme guess... when you registered, you were asked for your email address?
      There, fixed that for myself.

    137. Re:Hmm by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

      +1 Insightful or +1 Funny? Tough call.

      DIY Modding FTW! )

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    138. Re:Hmm by ezh · · Score: 1

      please get real: the russian gov't does not care about 'cyber warfare'. this 'warfare' is done by local hackers, usually 15-20 year old kids, who think they are helping their country in this way.

    139. Re:Hmm by ezh · · Score: 1

      just because spam company calls itself 'russian business network' does not mean anything. sort of like fox news calling itself 'fair and balanced'. see what i mean?

    140. Re:Hmm by aminorex · · Score: 1

      This is the BoFH view: Arrogant and contemptuous of all of the people they are screwing over with their bloody-minded rules, enforced on whim over the toy domain of their tin-pot tyranny. When mission-critical operations are irreparably harmed by this pettiness, their castle inevitably crashes to the ground, and their kingdom is lost.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    141. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That, plus the Chinese Spammers have been reassigned to Olympic censorship duty. It'll all be back in a few weeks.

    142. Re:Hmm by Jimbob+The+Mighty · · Score: 1
      *checks spam server*

      ... Sorry, what was your e-mail again?

    143. Re:Hmm by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      No, this is the competent view. Anyone running "mission critical" operations on a home internet connection isn't exactly a big deal. And if something someone else is doing on a home internet connection, there is a big business practices issue...

      Hobbyists don't carry much weight in the business net world

    144. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Postgrey will add a 5 minute lag to an email that's sending server has never sent an email to you. It's worth it to screw the spammers zombies over IMHO.

      So YOU are that guy that makes my mails 10-30 minutes late.
      It's a really stupid idea you to annoy users and if engouh of you people do it it won't work anymore anyway.

      So let me please get my email.

    145. Re:Hmm by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      insightful, for sure!

    146. Re:Hmm by himself · · Score: 1

      Isn't that "Red Dawn"? Man, I hope there's a 20th anniversary director's cut version soon!

    147. Re:Hmm by jdray · · Score: 1

      Windows? Oh, right. The other operating system.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    148. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this ispam? Like spam, but oh so pretty?

  2. I'm getting it by digitrev · · Score: 4, Funny

    My spam has tripled over the past few days. So I'm not getting all of it, but I'm getting a chunk of it.

    --
    Cynical Idealist
    1. Re:I'm getting it by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      I've seen a huge increase in both spam and particularly spam that makes it past my spam filter.

      Most of it in Russian too. Quite a bit of it is also "News" from CNN or MSNBC about the US leaving the Olympics or some other hot news topic.

      And people wonder why I'm moving to IM or Facebook (or other site I'm on) messages more. This is just damn annoying.

    2. Re:I'm getting it by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Heh, we've got a virus running around the site lately that is titled "CNN Gold Medal tracker".

      Sneaky ...

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    3. Re:I'm getting it by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We've been getting a lot of "reverse spam"...The organizational emails are necessarily public, so some enterprising Russian has harvested the entire set and is using them as "REPLY-TO" addresses, so we get all the bounce messages from their damn spamming.

      It's all the fun of having an exploited mail server without actually having an exploited mail server. The mail doesn't actually come from us so we're not having any blacklist problems, but the floods of bounce messages zip right through the spam filters and piss off the users.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    4. Re:I'm getting it by MPAB · · Score: 1

      Same for me, in all my email accounts the amount of spam has tripled or so.

    5. Re:I'm getting it by PARENA · · Score: 3, Informative

      Russian I was getting for a while, as well. Not anymore. /dev/null for anything with charset koi8-r or windows-1251.

      CNN I was getting for a few days. Seems to have disappeared again.

      --
      Here's the secret to immortality: ...oh dang, I forgot.
    6. Re:I'm getting it by KillerBob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've seen a huge increase in both spam and particularly spam that makes it past my spam filter.

      It's an arms race. They come out with a new message that tricks the filters into thinking it's real. The filters update and adapt. They rethink things and come out with a new junk message which sometimes succeeds, sometimes doesn't. When they find one that works, I start getting spam again until the filters adapt. Ad nauseum.

      I've got my SpamAssassin filters set to update on a daily cron job, and it's always the same... Every week or two, I get a handful of spam messages getting past the filters. They're all basically the same. And it lasts for about a day before I stop getting spam again. So it comes in bursts for me, every time the spammers rethink the message they send out.

      I've had my domain, and the same e-mail address for half a decade. My IP address did recently change when I moved into a new colo, but all of the DNS has updated already, so the spammers still know who I am. It's annoying. But it is manageable.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    7. Re:I'm getting it by nabsltd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't you hate it that you have to deal with this sort of thing because some other mail server isn't configured correctly?

      If all mail servers instituted the policy of "reject...don't accept then bounce", then there wouldn't be any blowback spam. Unfortunately, there is some MTA software that can't do the right thing without non-standard add-ons (qmail, I'm looking at you).

    8. Re:I'm getting it by fastest+fascist · · Score: 1

      I'm getting some of it, too. I didn't know the OPs genitals were so small!

    9. Re:I'm getting it by growse · · Score: 3, Informative

      Simple. Configure your mailserver to block all bounce messages unless they originate from a server that you've sent a mail to in the past 12 hours. Then you'll only get legit bounces.

      --
      There is nothing interesting going on at my blog
    10. Re:I'm getting it by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

      CNN I was getting for a few days. Seems to have disappeared again.

      Here the CNN stuff began to disappear a couple of days ago, only to be replaced by "MSNBC Breaking News" variants. Filters are catching most of it, though.

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    11. Re:I'm getting it by petermgreen · · Score: 5, Informative

      and you will block quite a few legit bounces too for two reasons

      1: 12 hours is nowhere near long enough
      2: the message may be routed through multiple servers before finally getting bounced.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    12. Re:I'm getting it by SgtAaron · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, there is some MTA software that can't do the right thing without non-standard add-ons (qmail, I'm looking at you).

      That's a patch, I think you're talking about. And applying a patch is quite easy. I won't get into applying multiple patches :)

      A couple months back a customer was hit by blowback, about 1000 a day for a few days, and I've saved all of them. I see that there are bounces from every MTA I've ever heard of--a LOT of postfix servers, exim, SMTPD32 (bah), etc.

      I mean, is there a point to bashing qmail so? We switched to qmail back in the '90's because it seemed bugtraq was always hollering about sendmail security holes. Bernstein's decision to allow the smtpd process as few privileges as possible was a design decision I happened to agree with very much at the time. Not only that, but it became impossible for spammers to verify that any address was real unless they wanted to use a valid and potentially traceable return path. Well, in retrospect, I suppose spammers dont have to give a shit as much now, since they have botnets at their control. They have changed everything.

      That being said, we did patch our incoming MX's to reject messages outright, since we were getting so much damn spam we had to split incoming servers across multiple machines, and rejecting invalid addresses on those seemed a good thing to do.

      -Aaron

    13. Re:I'm getting it by nabsltd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a patch, I think you're talking about. And applying a patch is quite easy.

      Today, with the qmail source in the public domain, yes, it's much easier. But, when you couldn't distribute pre-patched versons of qmail, it was a relative bear, since as you meniton, multiple patches became a nightmare. This was the first of many decisions by DJB "in the name of security" that are just unimaginably stupid. Plus, his refusal to incorporate such patches because they weren't his code...we'll, I'll just say it isn't the first time in history that ego has limited product quality.

      I mean, is there a point to bashing qmail so?

      The "sendmail security holes" were generally issues that, yes, could cause problems, but were highly unlikely. They were discovered and shut down. And, for about a decade, sendmail has been a solid platform that can be extended quite nicely to handle the current requirements of anti-spam, anti-virus, etc., all while still remaining interoperable with pretty much everything else on the net.

      qmail got it's bad reputation because it was an open relay out of the box. Any MTA that sends a e-mail to the sender's choice of recipient when that recipient isn't local (or a known alias/forward) is an open relay. And yet, people thought it was "more secure than sendmail".

      Not only that, but it became impossible for spammers to verify that any address was real unless they wanted to use a valid and potentially traceable return path.

      There is no such thing as "valid and potentially traceable return path" when you use the data supplied by the potential spammer as your source for what is "valid". The only thing truly "valid and tracable" in SMTP is the IP address that connected to your server. That's where the result message (error or not) has to go, and, again, out of the box qmail chose not to do this because DJB couldn't figure out a way to make this "secure". Yet, out of the box, sendmail manages to accomplish this without backscatter spam.

      Most of the design decisions made by DJB on qmail were based on a misunderstanding of the real world way that SMTP works across the Internet. As a local-only mail system, it's secure and not too broken. When connected to the Internet, it's only slightly better than Exchange at being a good SMTP server.

    14. Re:I'm getting it by imyy4u3 · · Score: 1

      it's called SPF records...if you have them no one can send spam out as you or use your address as a reply-to...right? right? isn't that why they were invented? wait, they don't work that way? whaaaaat?!

    15. Re:I'm getting it by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Are there still legit bounces? I don't think I've received a legitimate mail undeliverable message in about five years (probably because so many servers have a catch-all account). Obviously there's some lower-level stuff that never hits your inbox, but I don't see any major reason to avoid that save addressing network congestion issues.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    16. Re:I'm getting it by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      Wait - you mean John McCain didn't really tap Osama bin Laden as his running mate?

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    17. Re:I'm getting it by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      That's the whole point. They're using the REPLY-TO to point to a legitimate address on a legitimate domain, whereas the mail is coming from some other source.

      A number of spam filters will refuse to block mail where the REPLY-TO is correct on the principle that the actual email address is some sort of temporary/hotmail/whatever crap email sender for someone who has a legitimate interest.

      A sad little loophole that makes my life a bit harder.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    18. Re:I'm getting it by TMB · · Score: 1

      I'm Canadian, you insensitive clod! ;-)

    19. Re:I'm getting it by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Email is mission critical here; we can't afford to block bounce messages from anywhere because a non-response might be grounds for legal action. If they never received the email, however, it's not.

      Catch 22 for us; can't block the bounce messages, even though they're nearly all crap, because there exists a possibility that there might be a real one, and we can't afford to miss it.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    20. Re:I'm getting it by ednopantz · · Score: 1

      Simple. Configure your mailserver to block all bounce messages unless they originate from a server that you've sent a mail to in the past 12 hours. Then you'll only get legit bounces.

      One would think this easy, but some hosts--AppRiver, I'm looking at you--just can't handle this either.

    21. Re:I'm getting it by rthille · · Score: 1

      If you're going to go to the trouble to do that, go to a little more and sign your outgoing messages so you can identify legitimate bounces.

      Using BATV:
          http://mipassoc.org/batv/

      Or SRS:
          http://www.openspf.org/SRS

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    22. Re:I'm getting it by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``Don't you hate it that you have to deal with this sort of thing because some other mail server isn't configured correctly?''

      I do. But really, the problem is more fundamental. The problem is that email protocols do not reliably identify the sender of a message. If the message states it comes from "fred@example.com", it is assumed that it actually does come from this email address and that domain. Replies and bounces will then go to the MX for example.com and an attempt will be made to deliver them to the mailbox for fred. But really, "fred@example.com" is just a string anyone could have put there. It doesn't mean anything at all.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    23. Re:I'm getting it by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

      Hence the attempts at SPF and SenderID, which aims to provide some confidence if Reply addresses are genuine.

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    24. Re:I'm getting it by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      try running a catch-all mailbox. I did just out of interest and you have no idea how bad the backscatter problem is until you can receive for any possible address.

      As far as I'm concerned it's spam. So are those "I'm currently away from my office" auto responders.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    25. Re:I'm getting it by dword · · Score: 1

      Well then, problem solved, /. article closed. We know where the spam has gone, everyone can stop crying for it now.

    26. Re:I'm getting it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot one part of the arms race: The filters adapt and start blocking legit emails. Users cry bloody murder as they miss important emails. Spam filter rolls back unwise adaptation (sometimes skipped).

    27. Re:I'm getting it by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      If the message states it comes from "fred@example.com", it is assumed that it actually does come from this email address and that domain. Replies and bounces will then go to the MX for example.com and an attempt will be made to deliver them to the mailbox for fred. But really, "fred@example.com" is just a string anyone could have put there. It doesn't mean anything at all.

      The assumption you list is definitely a flaw, but since no good MTA will make that assumption, there shouldn't be a problem. But, Exchange, qmail and others incorrectly make that assumption, and thus fail miserably at being a good MTA.

      The correct assumption to make by an MTA is "the client connected to me is a valid relay server for the envelope-from address, and thus all status information should go right back to it down the SMTP connection". It's perfectly OK to do some checking (SPF, etc.) to figure out if the connecting client isn't a valid relay, and then reject the e-mail with an error message that lets the other end know why. That way, if it turns out to really be a valid relay, the user would be able to know that their e-mail didn't get through.

    28. Re:I'm getting it by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      5 days is about optimum for that kind of rule.

    29. Re:I'm getting it by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      sure but that doesn't solve the second problem which is that the machine that sends the bounce may not be the same machine you sent the mail too.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    30. Re:I'm getting it by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      That's absolutely true, but if you're going to have such a rule anyway it might as well be set up right :)

  3. Okay by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Funny

    And you're complaining because .... ?

    1. Re:Okay by kinzillah · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Perhaps he'd like to leave it to systems he controls? I, for one, would rather a third party weren't silently dropping mail that could be false positives.

      --
      Douglas P. Price
    2. Re:Okay by qortra · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He isn't complaining. It isn't wrong to ask questions when things unexpectedly go well.

    3. Re:Okay by bennybertow · · Score: 1

      And you're complaining because .... ?

      ... he now doesn't know where to get more V14GR4 from?

    4. Re:Okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I've been having sex about 800 times a day, perhaps 20 of which are consensual. Suddenly, Sunday or Monday evening, the rapes pretty much stopped. My volume of sex went down to to less than 100 a day, and as far as I can tell, I'm not missing any consensual sex. The cops insist that are doing nothing about it, and that they've changed nothing about how they do their job. I carry mace with me to mark, but not stop, my raper, and I'm still seeing the occasional rapper tagged by mace. But they're virtually all gone. And I haven't changed anything about my own rape prevention techniques, (my person has been rape-able for almost a decade). So what's going on? I can't believe that several major rapers would have vanished overnight. Any ideas?"

    5. Re:Okay by camperdave · · Score: 5, Funny

      And you're complaining because .... ?

      Without having the spam to process, the server doesn't run as hot as it's "supposed to". This causes a power imbalance, sending more current to the other servers and tripping breakers. Also, because of the lack of that heat, the server room is too cold. The UPS batteries are not storing enough of a charge as they are less efficient when they're cold. If a power sag, brownout, or blackout happens during one of these spam free moments, well, the results could be catastrophic.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:Okay by rbane3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I carry mace with me to mark, but not stop, my raper, and I'm still seeing the occasional rapper tagged by mace. But they're virtually all gone.

      I see what you did there! Subtle insight of your views concerning the Hip Hop "artist"?

    7. Re:Okay by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Gah. He's curious, not complaining.

    8. Re:Okay by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mace? Screw maze.

      Flurescent green spray paint is much better. Not only will you keep your assailant off of you, but you will also make it REALLY easy to pick him out of a line-up later.

      Police: "Can you identify the guy who jumped you?"
      Victim: "He's the green faced guy, crying on the corner about being blind."

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    9. Re:Okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe that several major rapers would have vanished overnight.

      That's because they haven't. There has been a decline in the number of rapists, however.

    10. Re:Okay by Rub1cnt · · Score: 1

      Now...all we need is to GPS tag the spam kings...Think about it...Survivor Spam!

      --
      Remember, it's not paranoia if they really ARE out to get you... :)
    11. Re:Okay by joelwyland · · Score: 1

      And you're complaining because .... ?

      ... because if someone is suddenly filtering his mail for him, perhaps they are filtering his good email too. Unexplained, drastic changes in traffic are a bad thing.

    12. Re:Okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea if things go too well you've missed something.

    13. Re:Okay by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Fluorescent green spray paint? Screw Fluorescent green spray paint.

      Model 686 is much better. Not only will you keep your assailant off of you, but it will make it REALLY easy to pick up his remains thus avoiding the line-up later.

      Police: "Can you identify the guy who jumped you?"
      Victim: "He's the guy laying over there bleeding."

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    14. Re:Okay by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      The difference is that in many places (especially outside the United States) owning guns is against the law. And if you then shoot someone you're probably in more trouble than the guy you shot.

      There is, however, no laws against carrying a concealed spray can (well, maybe in Singapore).

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    15. Re:Okay by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      His only friends are Nigerian princes and medical "professionals".

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    16. Re:Okay by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      It's a joke man....

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    17. Re:Okay by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Noooo you misunderstand.... he meant MACE as in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mace_(club)

      Works far better than spraypaint.

      "Which one? the one with his skull bashed in."

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    18. Re:Okay by citylivin · · Score: 1

      A great idea until you realize that walking around with a can of spray paint in your pocket will probably get you labeled as a graffito tagger and locked up.

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    19. Re:Okay by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Plasti-kote fluorescents ensure instant visibility and are ideal for identification and safety as well as decorative and craft projects. They can be used on both interior and exterior surfaces and on a wide range of materials.

      Interior surfaces? Ouch!

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    20. Re:Okay by mordejai · · Score: 1

      He's probably the kind of guy that gets mad at you because you spent TOO MUCH on his birthday present.

    21. Re:Okay by Hugonz · · Score: 1

      Because "you're no fun anymore"...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RexQLrcqwc

    22. Re:Okay by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but I don't understand your "power" metaphor. Could you explain this problem in terms of how it really works with tubes?

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    23. Re:Okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lab rat

    24. Re:Okay by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      They don't lock up graffiti taggers. Vandalism is a misdemeanor and not worth the cops' time or effort.

    25. Re:Okay by Zirnike · · Score: 1
      I know what you mean... I recently had to confirm registration to an e-mail that wasn't free (no gmail, etc.). So I set up a Comcast e-mail account for that purpose, being the only one I had access to. Apparently, Comcast drops spam without saying anything. I can't get the confirmation mail, there's no spam folder to check for false positives, tech support can't even access the spam folder to check, there's no way to alter that to 'expert mode' or something, and I can't whitelist any e-mail addresses.

      As an semi-related problem, you can't forward a message with inline attachments (like graphics). You have to download the pics, and then attach them. Not a problem for me, but my mom forwards all these joke e-mails... And there's no way to fix that, either. Can't disable the brokenness, and you can't manually inline images. And just to round it out, you can't bookmark the e-mail page as far as I can tell. You try, and it ends up sending you to the homepage.

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
  4. we are all doooomed by snugge · · Score: 0

    It must be a sign of the Apocalypse.

    1. Re:we are all doooomed by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Naw, just that the Russians have shifted all their botnets' attacks toward Georgia.

    2. Re:we are all doooomed by oldspewey · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I'll bet there's actually some element of truth in this!

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    3. Re:we are all doooomed by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Naw, just that the Russians have shifted all their botnets' attacks toward Georgia.

      Georgian soldier staring at his gunnery screen: No! I don't want a fuckin' larger penis!
           

    4. Re:we are all doooomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah this was the very first thing that came to my mind.

    5. Re:we are all doooomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might not be too far off base with that, you know... Most spam I get comes from RU.

  5. Did you install Skynet 1.0? by bugeaterr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did you install Skynet 1.0?

    Hey, what's that siren going off for....

    1. Re:Did you install Skynet 1.0? by dlaudel · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you implying that Skynet was just trying to do us a favor all along by nuking the spammers? This changes everything!

    2. Re:Did you install Skynet 1.0? by jdoss · · Score: 1

      "I, for one, welcome our new robotic overlords!", and all that.

  6. Exactly. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 3, Funny

    And you're complaining because .... ?

    No kidding. I work as a sysadmin, and as far as I'm concerned, a spam-free day is an occasion to praise my patron demon and bring Him an offering of hookers and blow, not an excuse for an "Ask Slashdot" posting.

    1. Re:Exactly. by Arimus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Assuming a third party isn't dropping your email... if they are then that's almost as bad the spam deluge - I'd rather be the one to decide what is spam than a third party who may or may not have a clue.

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    2. Re:Exactly. by Minwee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I, on the other hand, consider sudden, dramatic, and completely unexplained changes to the operation of systems under my control to be a reason to worry.

      I'm just funny that way.

    3. Re:Exactly. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      a spam-free day is an occasion to praise my patron demon and bring Him an offering of hookers and blow

      That might work, but I'll bet implementing SpamAssassin or [insert your favorite spam filter here] is much, much cheaper. ;)

    4. Re:Exactly. by Bandman · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, as a sysadmin, you know that any precipitated change is bad, or at least troubling.

      Things like this are usually a sign of bigger trouble somewhere else, which may or may not be the submitter's problem.

    5. Re:Exactly. by Bandman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Amen.

      It's like we speak the same language.

      Change is good. Unexpected change is very, very bad.

    6. Re:Exactly. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      The problem is more of the kind that if all seems well, THEN I shall start worrying...

      Have spammers found a hole in my mail setup, or what have they found?

      But it may be something like a case where the mail list generator has dropped the address in question and then several spammers have done an upgrade of their systems.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    7. Re:Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, on the other hand, consider sudden, dramatic, and completely unexplained changes to the operation of systems under my control to be a reason to worry.

      Me too.

      On the other hand, the rate of incoming spam varies dramatically. Spammers often spend some time thinking and designing spam campaigns.

    8. Re:Exactly. by omnichad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh yes...they try really hard to craft the perfect body text. I'd say they produce some of the best unintelligible ramblings around.

    9. Re:Exactly. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh yes...they try really hard to craft the perfect body text. I'd say they produce some of the best unintelligible ramblings around.

      You mean aside from Slashdot readers, right?

    10. Re:Exactly. by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      I'm not as worried about the readers as I am about the ones who post (esp. the editors who don't edit).

      Layne

    11. Re:Exactly. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, as a sysadmin, you know that any precipitated change is bad, or at least troubling.

      I also know not to let that stop me from making a good joke -- or a bad one, for that matter.

    12. Re:Exactly. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      I've got SpamAssassion, and while I say that the hookers 'n blow are for Arioch, that's a lie. They're really for me and the missus.

    13. Re:Exactly. by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Change is good. Unexpected change is very, very bad.

      I can't agree with that AT ALL. When the gasoline prices change, they get higher. It isn't unexpected, but it's BAD.

      OTOH if all of a sudden I was for no reason apparent to myself attractive to women to the point that they were fighting over who I would let have sex with me, that would be VERY VERY DOUBLE PLUS GOOD! Worrisome, perhaps, but DAMNED GOOD.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    14. Re:Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      dream on my friend. dream on.

    15. Re:Exactly. by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      ...as far as I'm concerned, a spam-free day is an occasion to praise my patron demon and bring Him an offering of hookers and blow...

      Would you perchance be open to applications to become your patron demon? It sounds like a nice job to have.

      Would blackjack be a reasonable substitution for blow?

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    16. Re:Exactly. by ari_j · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unexpected change can be good, too. It's unexplained change that worries me. An object in motion remains in motion until acted on by an external force. It's when Newton starts looking like a fool that I start to get concerned.

    17. Re:Exactly. by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      Agreed - because the key is understanding the system. If something goes well, but you don't understand why, the bad thing is precisely that you don't understand what is happening. If you cannot understand a system that is running well, you probably won't be able to understand it when it fails. Any mismatch between the world, and your view of it, indicates a missing piece in your understanding that warrants solving.

      As for the spam issue, I suspect the domain host has implemented a spam filter and they're not communicating that to you for some reason; something very similar happened to me.

    18. Re:Exactly. by stevey · · Score: 1

      I think most decent competent SPAM filtering companies allow you to see a quarantine of "rejected" messages - I know that my service does.

      That way if they make a mistake (and lets face it sooner or later they will) you have the chance to find it.

      Still given a large enough quarantine checking through it manually becomes almost as much of a chore as doing so locally would have been.

    19. Re:Exactly. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      Would you perchance be open to applications to become your patron demon? It sounds like a nice job to have.

      Would blackjack be a reasonable substitution for blow?

      Well, Arioch comes when I summon him most of the time, and does horrible things to obnoxious users. What can you do for me?

    20. Re:Exactly. by Digital+End · · Score: 2, Funny

      Methinks your wife may view the situation differently

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
    21. Re:Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OTOH if all of a sudden I was for no reason apparent to myself attractive to women to the point that they were fighting over who I would let have sex with me, that would be VERY VERY DOUBLE PLUS GOOD!

      change your standards.. you can be in that position if you get into Urban Tantra Polyamory.

    22. Re:Exactly. by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Would you perchance be open to applications to become your patron demon? It sounds like a nice job to have.

      Would blackjack be a reasonable substitution for blow?

      Well, Arioch comes when I summon him most of the time, and does horrible things to obnoxious users. What can you do for me?

      Why is it always all about you?

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    23. Re:Exactly. by Minwee · · Score: 1

      But the readers who don't read aren't a problem?

    24. Re:Exactly. by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      After my divorce my daughter told me once that my expectations were too high and I should be less choosy. So, she wound up hating both of the two girlfriends I got, both of whom are dying of chirrosis because they would have a beer drank before my coffee finished perking.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    25. Re:Exactly. by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I don't have a wife; I've been divorced for five years.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    26. Re:Exactly. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      OTOH if all of a sudden I was for no reason apparent to myself attractive to women to the point that they were fighting over who I would let have sex with me, that would be VERY VERY DOUBLE PLUS GOOD! Worrisome, perhaps, but DAMNED GOOD.

      Be very careful what you wish for...

    27. Re:Exactly. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Be very careful what you wish for.

    28. Re:Exactly. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      It's okay to be slightly more choosy than that. Best bet is to keep your mind open and understand what you're really looking for in a woman. And be realistic. If 'looks as hot as Angelina Jolie' is on your list, you better have either the looks or the bank account of Brad Pitt. Obviously, having both seems to have helped Brad out. ;)

    29. Re:Exactly. by dbIII · · Score: 1
      I had a similar situation. The upstream ISP had changed their policy to filter all mail traffic unless the customer said otherwise. Personally I prefer all mail traffic to hit a place where I can read the logs before it gets filtered.

      Example: An increasingly common salesfolk trick is "I sent you X two days ago - it must have got stuck in your spam filter". In one case for me the lie was documentation for a multi-million dollar tender which was missed because the email was never sent (or may have been sent to the wrong address but I strongly doubt it). You need those logs or you could be punished for perceived incompetance due to the lies of others.

    30. Re:Exactly. by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      On the issue of who gets to decide what 'spam' to drop: Agreed, totally!!

      -Mike, of Viagra Resellers, Niger national division

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    31. Re:Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. And that's why I've uninstalled OS X 10.5 and went back to 10.4.

    32. Re:Exactly. by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      I think the OP has a bit of an issue with job security, if spam keeps dropping at this rate he/she may be forced to generate some in order to stay employed.

      Alternatively, we could help out by forwarding all our spam.

    33. Re:Exactly. by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      The answer to that is really easy though, it means that you have gotten married, or some chick has spread the rumour that you were good in bed.

    34. Re:Exactly. by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      it simply means that you have gotten married recently or that some chick has been bragging about your performance in bed.

  7. I can forward you some of mine if that helps... by mattMad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... just in case you desperately need to buy some cheap "medicine" :-)

    1. Re:I can forward you some of mine if that helps... by Noexit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That might actually be a not bad idea. Sending him something that can be confirmed as having been sent, and as being spammy.

      --

      Never argue with a man carrying a water buffalo

  8. cyber warfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The spamming botnets are now being used to generate profit by aiming themselves at the government of Georgia.

  9. Because... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 4, Funny

    When spammers took over your box, they didn't want to flood it with their own mail.

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    1. Re:Because... by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      lol... yea, look for a bot in your network...

      Also, your ISP may not be filtering, but the ISPs between you and the spammers may be. Also, a big botnet (Shadow) is in its death throws, currently seeding it's own bots with a file that disables the nodes, since investigators cought 2 of the people behind the network the other day.

      Could also be you're domain was devalued by the spammers (not worth as much since you seem to be cathcing all the spam). That happened to my domain after about a year of good filtering and good user control.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
  10. One down by canderley · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:One down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Did you read that article?
      "Shadow appears to have been mostly confined to the Netherlands, as the messages and phishing hooks were all sent in Dutch, but had apparently infected some US systems as well, as the FBI is credited for assisting on the case."

    2. Re:One down by montyzooooma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The bot may have been confined to the Netherlands but that doesn't mean it wasn't used to spam worldwide.

    3. Re:One down by bearl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Did you read the article? "...as the messages and phishing hooks were all sent in Dutch,..."

      Since the original poster didn't mention what portion of his spam was arriving written in DUTCH, we can't say for sure, but it appears, as the article says (up near the top too!), this botnet, while large, was almost completely confined to the Netherlands.

      I'll save you the reply too, should you go back and read the article, the rest of the sentence I quoted above says "...but had apparently infected some US systems as well, as the FBI is credited for assisting on the case." However it does say that ALL the messages were sent in Dutch.

      Probably not our boy's spam.

    4. Re:One down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you you haven't got multiple domain names resolving to the same ip and one of them has expired?

    5. Re:One down by bdwebb · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Okay...I'm going to say this sloooooowwwww. Just because the messages are '...all sent in Dutch,...' has no bearing on the actual destination of those messages. If the sentence said '...all sent in Dutch, to Dutch email addresses...' you would sound a lot smarter right now. It doesn't matter in the least where the hell the botnet was located when you're talking about teh internets...that's why it is such a popular space; it allows us to act superior and snotty toward one another across entire continents. Seems like you're the one who really needs to go back and do the reading.

    6. Re:One down by canderley · · Score: 1

      Did the OP say he was in the US? Nope. Did I say that the Shadow botnet was the cause of his spam? Nope.

    7. Re:One down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No one said there was a huge drop in Dutch language spams!

      Okay...I'm going to say this sloooooowwwww.

      Asshat.

    8. Re:One down by bearl · · Score: 1

      The article also says that the police took control of the Netherlands botnet "several weeks ago."

      While it doesn't say that the police continued to send out spam until this past Sunday (which is when the original poster reported his spam volume dropped), can we at least assume that this botnet that came under police control several weeks ago and was sending out Dutch spam, was probably not the source of the drop in spam that this original article is asking about?

      Please? Can we assume that?

    9. Re:One down by bdwebb · · Score: 1

      While that may be the case, and yes I will grant you permission to make that assumption, it still doesn't change the fact that the reason you put forth in your previous post that this likely was not the source of the spam was completely wrong and you were being a snide asshat about it.

    10. Re:One down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Good point. So this whole little thread is Off Topic to the original article.

      Mods, go to it.

  11. Aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ??

  12. Oops... by bhamlin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry, we've been down for maintenance and it's taking a lot longer than we originally planned. You can expect normal service to resume by next monday.

    1. Re:Oops... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      (Slight rewrite:)

      Sorry, our zombie server has been down for maintenance and it's taking a lot longer than we originally planned. The FBI has been snooping around of late, slowing our restart. However, to get the same spam experience you know you love and crave, please visit www.bi3penls.com and www.sup3rL0wM0rtg4ge.com.
           

    2. Re:Oops... by IronChef · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Netflix is down, and this guy's spam stops.

      Coincidence?

    3. Re:Oops... by IronChef · · Score: 1

      +1 Interesting?! INTERESTING? You guys are nuts. :) I was aiming for +1 Funny.

  13. ISP by ClosedEyesSeeing · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the ISP installed an IronPort system.

  14. Shadow botnet was killed recently by Nimey · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
    1. Re:Shadow botnet was killed recently by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be crazy? Really think about it. Making the (admittedly very large) assumption that this murderous %$@$#% accounted for ~85% of the spam this poster got, how many spammers can there be?

      Are two or three master asshats ruining the Internet for everybody?

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  15. So it's become real... by Seakip18 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Spam Assassin is actually assassinating spam.

    On another note, has anyone heard from cousin who is a Nigerian prince? He hasn't called in days and we're beginning to get worried.....

    --
    import system.cool.Sig;
    1. Re:So it's become real... by LordEd · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should check the CNN news reports?

    2. Re:So it's become real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should check the CNN news reports?

      *WOOSH*

    3. Re:So it's become real... by Theolojin · · Score: 1

      On another note, has anyone heard from cousin who is a Nigerian prince? He hasn't called in days and we're beginning to get worried.....

      Oh, don't worry. He's fine. I just spoke with him last week (well, via email). I got ahold of him just in time, too. The next day my bank seems to have made some sort of accounting error that I'm still fighting with them about (how in the world could it be *my* fault?). Anyhoo, I won't miss the funds for much longer, thanks to my dear prince.

      --
      Life is short; think quickly.
    4. Re:So it's become real... by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should check the CNN news [net-security.org] reports?

      *WOOSH*

      *The not rare enough DOUBLE WOOSH*

    5. Re:So it's become real... by Smivs · · Score: 1

      On another note, has anyone heard from cousin who is a Nigerian prince? He hasn't called in days and we're beginning to get worried.....

      Didn't he get married to an orphan girl called Carine Idah Kouakou from the Ivory Coast?

    6. Re:So it's become real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's here. Good news! In about nine months, you're going to be a grandpa. Turns out those Nigerian spammers are truly well-endowed, and every white gal in the neighborhood has turned up pregnant since Cousin came to visit the generous American family who helped secure the release of his fortune, the one that was being held by corrupt insiders within the Nigerian parliament.

    7. Re:So it's become real... by batquux · · Score: 1

      Actually yes, and I'm afraid I have bad news. He's dying from some rare disease. He asked me to help him transfer his savings to you.

    8. Re:So it's become real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL - Seriously though, spam originating from Nigeria has ceased for me as of this past week.

    9. Re:So it's become real... by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      hilarious!

  16. Botnet by mrbah · · Score: 1

    It was probably all coming from one botnet. Maybe the spammers renting it didn't pay their bill.

    1. Re:Botnet by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      I don't know why this question was even asked.

      It's obvious that a spam source was simply shut down. People may not believe this but ISPs do disconnect people for spamming.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  17. Maybe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China imploded?

    1. Re:Maybe.... by Intron · · Score: 1

      I was thinking maybe China Telecom has stopped supporting spamming until the end of the Olympics, but that would be too much to hope for.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  18. You're lucky for a few days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still seeing 1000-1100 per day, mostly bounced mail where spammers have used my domain as the sender - tossers!

  19. FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FBI took down a large botnet not too long ago.

  20. those chinese spam factories are shut down ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... to save the health of the athletes.

  21. The Russians are busy in Georgia... by NMBob · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and the Chinese are busy watching 13-year olds win gold metals. Bob

    1. Re:The Russians are busy in Georgia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like a 9 year old or she could have similar genetics to Gary Coleman?

  22. We Can Test by awitod · · Score: 5, Funny

    We're happy to help you solve this mystery.
    What is your email address?

    1. Re:We Can Test by 3seas · · Score: 1

      That was so obvious a response I was only surprised at how far down in the responses it was that I saw it.

      mod -1 for delayed obvious reaction time

    2. Re:We Can Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cmdrtaco@slashdot.org

    3. Re:We Can Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is your email address?

      balmy.stevie@microsoft.com

  23. We got bored of the joke by Bogtha · · Score: 5, Funny

    Okay, here's the thing: nobody but you ever got spam. We all just thought it would be funny to fool you into thinking there was some kind of worldwide scamming epidemic. You don't seriously think people would be stupid enough to buy pills off strangers who email them out of the blue, do you? I thought we'd gone a bit too far and stretched the limits of credibility when we came up with the idea for the Nigerian scams, but I was wrong, you even fell for that! Nobody is stupid enough to send all their money to a "Nigerian prince".

    Anyway, enough's enough. The joke's stale now, so we decided to stop sending it all to you.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    1. Re:We got bored of the joke by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      Aw man, why'ld you have to go and tell him what the deal was. I thought we were going to wait till he had lowered his defenses and then offer to show him nude celebrities and celebrity sex videos for free. Sheesh, you spoilsport.

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    2. Re:We got bored of the joke by mistahkurtz · · Score: 1

      actually, i liked the joke.

      --
      not only is time travel possible, it's irrelevant.
  24. Don't Complain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's my only suggestion

  25. Spam has relatively few sources by Toe,+The · · Score: 4, Funny

    A large chunk of spam comes from a very small group of spammers. It may just be that you are only targeted by one of them, and he took a break recently.

    Hang in there... he'll come back from vacation soon, and you'll be able to mortgage your penis to Nigeria again.

    1. Re:Spam has relatively few sources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I know that the mortgage-market in the States right now is a bit tight, but mortgaging your penis to Nigerians just seems like a bad investment.

    2. Re:Spam has relatively few sources by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but each spammer has their own list of victims. Two different addresses may receive completely different spam, because they're not both on the same lists. This can account for one server seeing a drop in spam volume while another server doesn't: users on the first server are on the list of a spammer who took a vacation; users on the second server aren't on that spammer's list.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  26. I Stole It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm holding it for ransom. You can have it back for $1,000,000.

    1. Re:I Stole It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wash your hands when your done.

    2. Re:I Stole It by Flaming+Babies · · Score: 1

      Dear Sir,

      Confidential Business Proposal

      Having consulted with my colleagues and based on the information gathered from the Nigerian Chambers Of Commerce And Industry, I have the privilege to request your assistance to transfer the sum of $1,000,000.00 (one million United States dollars) into your accounts. The above sum resulted from an over-invoiced contract, executed, commissioned and paid for about five years (5) ago by a foreign contractor. This action was however intentional and since then the fund has been in a suspense account at The Central Bank Of Nigeria Apex Bank.

      We are now ready to transfer the fund overseas and that is where you come in. It is important to inform you that as civil servants, we are forbidden to operate a foreign account; that is why we require your assistance. The total sum will be shared as follows: 10% for us, 85% for you and 5% for local and international expenses incidental to the transfer.

      The transfer is risk free on both sides. I am an accountant with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC). If you find this proposal acceptable, we shall require the following documents:

      (a) your banker's name, telephone, account and fax numbers.

      (b) your private telephone and fax numbers â"for confidentiality and easy communication.

      (c) your letter-headed paper stamped and signed.

      Alternatively we will furnish you with the text of what to type into your letter-headed paper, along with a breakdown explaining, comprehensively what we require of you. The business will take us thirty (30) working days to accomplish.

      Please reply urgently.

      Best regards

      Mr. Babies

      --
      The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
  27. A "Shadow" of their former selves? by DCheesi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Were the missing spam-mails mostly in Dutch?

    http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080814-police-nab-shadow-creators-force-botnet-to-commit-suicide.html

    "Shadow appears to have been mostly confined to the Netherlands, as the messages and phishing hooks were all sent in Dutch, but had apparently infected some US systems as well, as the FBI is credited for assisting on the case."

    ...

    "Once Shadow was secured, the police contacted Kaspersky Labs about providing a means to neutralize the malware."

    1. Re:A "Shadow" of their former selves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hooks were in Dutch, which is why most of the infected machines were in the Netherlands.

      This says nothing about what was sent after the hooks were set and the unwilling computer reeled into the botnet.

      I imagine that the most effective form of spamming is to spam Americans. A lot of us have email, credit cards, and a complete lack of self control. The perfect target.

      Just an observation.

    2. Re:A "Shadow" of their former selves? by vic-traill · · Score: 1

      The shutdown of the Shadow bot is an interesting co-operative effort, but does it give rise to a new layer within the onion? We can expect phishing mails to now represent themselves as anti-malware agency/company X, telling you you're infected and pointing to a page with convenient 'utilities' for 'cleaning' your desktop up.

      How is a user to differentiate between legit and attacking communications?

      And the beat goes on ...

      --
      [17] Leary, T., White, C., Wood, P. R., Bhabha, W. D., and Wirth, N. Lambda calculus considered harmful. In Proceedings
    3. Re:A "Shadow" of their former selves? by AttilaSz · · Score: 1

      How do you expect him to figure out what language was used in mails he did not receive?

      I know, he could compare the relative ratio of languages in spam messages before the drop and after the drop (if he had too much time on his hands), but your question formulation was still funny :-)

      --
      Sig erased via substitution of an identical one.
  28. What was your address again? by jkc120 · · Score: 1

    Post your email address here, I'm sure you'll start getting tons of spam again in no time. :-)

    --
    "I drank what?" -Socrates
  29. Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our spam-eating overlords.

  30. One botnet down, at least by saunabad · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Dutch police have busted Shadow botnet: http://news.zdnet.com/2424-9595_22-216237.html

  31. I can kinda confirm this. by suso · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I run a web hosting company and over the past couple weeks I've had a few customers report that the amount of spam has dropped. Of course, they thought that this was something wrong, but I couldn't find any evidence of increased failures, it was just that there was slightly less mail coming in.

    1. Re:I can kinda confirm this. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I've had a few customers report that the amount of spam has dropped. Of course, they thought that this was something wrong, but I couldn't find any evidence of increased failures

      Good customer service would dictate you pad their boxes with phony spam so that they don't get uncomfortable with the drop. I can loan you some of mine for a small fee :-)

      It's sort of like when my wife reduces her nagging toward me; I start to suspect something odd and get concerned. I purposely have to piss her off (not a hard thing to do) to get the nag rate back to normal.
         

    2. Re:I can kinda confirm this. by fayd · · Score: 1

      I can confirm this too:

      --- Report for: Aug 14 ---
      16034 Total email handled

      262 stopped by Postfix rules
      14969 stopped by Spamhaus block-list
      398 stopped by SpamAssassin
      0 stopped by Anti-Virus

      405 emails delivered to users

      A month ago, Total email handled was over 30K, every day. The email delivered to users remains relatively unchanged.

    3. Re:I can kinda confirm this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know the CAN-SPAM act is a miserable failure when...

      After several years, the spam drops off a little for a couple days and everybody starts wondering what part of the network isn't working.

    4. Re:I can kinda confirm this. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I don't normally get a lot of spam (I have ELN's filter set to medium, which catches about 80% of it) but now that you mention it... yesterday I processed a week's worth of mail all at once, and there was hardly any spam in it. Maybe 100 out of 1300 messages, and probably half of those from the same two senders.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  32. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the calm before the storm.

  33. What's your email address? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll forward you some of my spam. Wouldn't want you to feel lonely.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  34. Check by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm not sure what's causing your lack of spam. What's your email address?

    1. Re:Check by MPAB · · Score: 5, Funny

      I find your lack of spam disturbing ...

  35. the russian business network is busy by circletimessquare · · Score: 0, Redundant

    they need the botnet resources for ddosing georgia

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:the russian business network is busy by DCheesi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      they need the botnet resources for ddosing georgia

      The sad thing is, you might be right...

    2. Re:the russian business network is busy by craagz · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it could be because of this guy selling off some spamming servers to buy his house http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7563123.stm

  36. Still the same old same old by Punker22 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We provide a spam filtering service, and our volume hasn't really changed much in the past week or two so perhaps whichever botnet was sending you all the trash went offline or just... stopped sending to you.

  37. Botnets current tasked to higher priority jobs by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/12/191255&from=rss
    http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/11/georgia-takes-a-beating-in-the-cyberwar-with-russia/

    When the crisis abates, I expect the botnets will be returned to their regularly scheduled duties. Quite a versatile tool those botnets -- pimping V!agr4, collapsing government sites, enhancing the male doodad, distributing pr0n, bullying your neighbors (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6665145.stm). For the cost of one M1A1 tank tread, Putin bought himself a whole lot of firepower.

    Advantage: Putin.

    1. Re:Botnets current tasked to higher priority jobs by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For the cost of one M1A1 tank tread, Putin bought himself a whole lot of firepower.

      This is so obviously the answer that the parent needs to get to +5 Insightful as soon as possible and that can be the end of the story.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    2. Re:Botnets current tasked to higher priority jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing, wait until the US picks a target and every windows machine (including those 4 vista machines they sold) will start pumping mail like there's no tomorrow (which there might not be )

    3. Re:Botnets current tasked to higher priority jobs by Weezul · · Score: 1

      We should start calling it Putin mail.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  38. I can confirm this by Simon+(S2) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This happened to me too about a week ago, and I was as surprised as you. I am from Italy, and I got about 200 mails a day, about 5 of them not spam. Now I get about 80/day. They are not vanished, but the volume of Spam mails dropped significantly the last week or so.

    --
    I just don't trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn't die.
    1. Re:I can confirm this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also have seen a drop from about 2500-3000 a month to about 350. This happened about 1-2 months ago and is still holding at ~350 a month.

  39. Reality... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Without seeing your logs, most folks would be guessing. They symptoms you provide are not enough to make an educated guess. I would say to bump up the verbosity of your email server, SpamAssassin, and the system itself and then go from there.

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  40. Easy by eclectro · · Score: 1

    China suspended spamming operations during the Olympics. Back next week!

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Easy by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Have you seen their coal-fired spam engines? Those things produced almost one ton of carbon for each 500 messages delivered.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  41. Russians are busy attacking Georgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The spammers are busy attacking Georgia with their botnets, turns out all the spam comes from Russia.

  42. Noticed the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with several webmails such as yahoo and hotmail, but rather I've noticed this in the past 2 weeks. I'm not winning foreign lotteries anymore or being asked to transfer millions of dollars. Bill Gates no longer wants to give me 500k pounds for being a random windows user . . . What gives?

  43. Fake News Alerts by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Fake news alerts seem to be the new thing for my inbox.

  44. Here's a clue on the missing Spam... by Zymergy · · Score: 1
  45. Oingo Boingo! by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 3, Funny

    When Slashdot has a real slow news day
    Tell me where my spam's gone
    When Nigeria no longer needs me
    Tell me where my spam's gone
    When trojan horse avoid my inbox
    Tell me where my spam's gone
    When penis pumps cease their pumping
    Tell me where my spam's gone
    When free porn streaming doesn't bug me
    Tell me where my spam's gone
    When people install virus checkers
    Tell me where my spam's gone

    1. Re:Oingo Boingo! by rbane3 · · Score: 1

      Funny.. when I read the title, for some reason I keep hearing it in the tune of Paula Cole's "Where Have All the Cowboys Gone?"... Not at all within my typical music genre either.

    2. Re:Oingo Boingo! by Ignatius+D'Lusional · · Score: 1

      LOL! Awesome! Oingo Boingo rules!

  46. I have it by No2Gates · · Score: 1

    I'm eating your spam, having it forwarded to me.

    BTW, there's a lot of people in Nigeria who have money for you.

    --
    Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
    1. Re:I have it by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, no, no...

      Im in ur mailserverz, eating ur spam!

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    2. Re:I have it by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I'm really ashamed that I get it and find it funny.

    3. Re:I have it by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1, Informative

      Memez are in ur brainz, eating ur intelligence.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    4. Re:I have it by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      That's ok, not my class anyway.

      I put on my wizard's hat and robe...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  47. headless botnets by Lord+Ender · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We've been seeing botnets changing desktop background to an image alerting people that they are infected with a virus. Obviously a real spam botnet operator would not alert people like that.

    My theory is that some grayhat wrested control of a major botnet, and is shutting it down from the source (and alerting the victims in the process).

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:headless botnets by drachenstern · · Score: 2, Informative

      lemme guess, most common infection name is Antivirus XP 2008?

      I've started having those pop up left and right, and you are correct, once you think you have the virus gone, you think you're clean. EEEEEEE wrong. There's actually a botnet hiding behind that virus load, and if you don't pull it off, it does it's own direct port 25 push. I've three computers in my near vicinity that all have that loaded on their systems, and at first I was ready to wipe the frigging machine.

      Don't forget to clear system restore too!!!

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    2. Re:headless botnets by radish · · Score: 1

      That greyhat would be Kapersky Labs and the Dutch police :)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:headless botnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's likely all those machines may have been used as proxies for more than one botnet, if most of those machines are down for servicing now that their owners know about it then perhaps it did a lot more damage to spammers than one would think. At least we can hope.

    4. Re:headless botnets by Quantus347 · · Score: 1

      I got that one too. In the end i actually did the full system reformat (it was time anyway...I hate windows), only to find out that it was hiding in a forgotten system sector of one of my secondary drives. Apparently I had load WinME on it sometime in the distant past and never wiped it properly.

      --
      Common Sense isn't as Common as people think...
    5. Re:headless botnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, that is a symptom of another kind of infection - one that requests you to send money to them and they can clean your system.

    6. Re:headless botnets by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

      Fsecure has details on a trojan that does this and also has a screenshot of what the desktop looks like.

      If you have the same thing, your people's computers ARE infected.

      http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/trojan_w32_pakes_csg.shtml

      From the summary:

      Trojan:W32/Pakes.CSG attempts to get "rogueware" installed on the victim's computer by claiming the computer is infected by spyware.

      It also makes changes to the system registry and posts information about the computer to a remote server.

    7. Re:headless botnets by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      I was infected twice on my EEE PC with this thing. I didn't install AV since its kinda slow anyways so I reformatted twice. First time I've been infected with a virus in 10 years. BTW - first infection was from a link to a PDF which opened reader and launched an EXE. Good idea to turn PDF in-browser off.

      Other than AV, is there another software that will protect from this one. Its a major PITA. As you said you think its gone and it ain't. I know my way around windows and I thought I'd get rid of this one fast. Its not easy without the right software.

    8. Re:headless botnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Please sight the source. For once your mod "Interesting" really is.

    9. Re:headless botnets by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      It seems to be a two-parter. One is a payload and one is a "diverter". Let the AV deal with the obvious threat, the diverter, and let the payload get on the system. Perhaps someone has done something else to the box? All I know is I got mad SMTP outbound connections from this box for no good reason.

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    10. Re:headless botnets by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cite my source? I am the primary source. I have a forensic image of such a machine sitting right next to me.

      Not everything on the internet originates at some other place on the internet. Somewhere, original sources actually exist, and they have nothing else to cite.

      I have seen four such infections, all came through hotmail (we think).

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    11. Re:headless botnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My theory is that some grayhat wrested control of a major botnet, and is shutting it down from the source (and alerting the victims in the process).

      Alternate Theory: Some douche is changing the desktop background image so my grandma will click on their malware popup ads for "anti" virus software, thereby ruining my weekend.

    12. Re:headless botnets by DragonDru · · Score: 1

      I hope you are right, but you piqued my interest just enough that I googled it. It looks like this technique is also used to spread some fake AV software that further infects the machine. http://www.mac-net.com/1553480.page http://www.mac-net.com/1554482.page http://www.avertlabs.com/research/blog/index.php/2008/06/18/scary-screensavers-take-two/

      --
      20 characters max for the password? How will I use my favorite poems as passwords?
    13. Re:headless botnets by SnoopJeDi · · Score: 1

      There must be something awful special about the warning. I've seen malicious background changes to 'fake' alerts plenty of times. The more convincing you are to the victim, the more likely they'll buy your 'removal' software. Or at least I suppose that's the scheme.

      But changing a background is certainly something automation is capable of.

    14. Re:headless botnets by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      The virus we are seeing does not (to my knowledge) advertise for any particular AV product, nor does it ask for ransom or anything like that.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    15. Re:headless botnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen that tactic used by one of those malware/fraudware "antivirus" applications that use scare tactics to trick people into buying their software. Why do you think it's a botnet at work?

  48. maybe they are attacking Georgia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the bot nets and the spammers are doing DoS attacks on Georgia right now?

  49. they just gave up on you... by whtvr · · Score: 1

    dude, have you bought any v14gr4 lately or enlarged your wilson? if not you're a lost cause to all online "retailers", there's no point of wasting good spam on you if you're not going to buy any stuff anyway...

  50. The Spammers Went Down to Georgia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if all the allegations of national origins for many spammers are true, those botnets may be busy taking down the Georgian government's internet presence.

  51. We Apologize by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Sir,
    We humbly apologize for the interruption in service. Please reply with your email address and our technical staff will get back to you.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  52. spammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The spammer's mom caught wind of his naughty deeds and kicked him out of her basement? The parasite will find it's new host soon enough, don't worry.

  53. Russian botnets being devoted to other purposes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The usual lot of Cyrillic text, along with .ua and .ru domains names has been conspicuously absent from my spam folder the past day or so.

  54. Spammers are busy by El_Ehmenopio · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The Russian created botnets, that spammers use, are busy attacking Georgia. The good news, is that you'll never see spam again. These guys have nukes, and after WWIII, you'll actually be happy to find canned spam in the rubble. Sadly, If "W" was not in office, and our Army wasn't bogged down in a quagmire, those clowns would not have dared trying to stir up sh... er stuff. They're doing it now, because they won't be able to do it later, when we get a real president. And Yes, either Obama or McCain will probably be a real president. There is nowhere to go but up.

    1. Re:Spammers are busy by dAzED1 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      ahh, so you're one of those that believe it is Bush's fault Russia did this. Watching much Russian state tv lately? Do you believe the Earth is flat, too?

      How about we say that what the Russians did was, well, the Russian's fault. And your "quagmire" crap is looking weaker and weaker these days. We're the evil ones, right? Because when we went into Iraq, we were looting and robbing banks?

    2. Re:Spammers are busy by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      I'm not the flamebait, idiot mods...I'm the flame.

  55. not on this end by JohnCub · · Score: 2, Informative

    our spam seems to be climbing.
    # of spams / date (m/d)
    16,037 8/15
    17,385 8/14
    17,287 8/13
    16,352 8/12
    15,171 8/11
    16,505 8/10
    14,344 8/9
    12,157 8/8
    12,465 8/7
    11,942 8/6
    12,265 8/5
    10,124 8/4
    11,437 8/3
    13,417 8/2
    12,858 8/1

    --
    -= Why can't I add 'Anonymous Coward' to my list of Foes? =-
    1. Re:not on this end by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      our spam seems to be climbing.

      Ahah! You took it! Now please give it back.
                 

  56. Bill G. took care of it by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Finally, Bill Gates got tired of all the spam, and took care of it as promised.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:Bill G. took care of it by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1
      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  57. Crazy theory: blame the Russians by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    Here's a crazy theory to explain it: Russian-controlled botnets were the source of a huge amount of spam volume. These botnets are now hard at work DDOSing the government websites of Georgia and its friends.

  58. I'm not seeing any decline by Animats · · Score: 1

    I'm not seeing any significant decline in spam. Here are my spam log statistics, which combine mail received by about ten e-mail addresses at five domains:

    • Graymail for Aug 15, 543 new messages for animats.
    • Graymail for Aug 14, 631 new messages for animats.
    • Graymail for Aug 13, 645 new messages for animats.
    • Graymail for Aug 12, 566 new messages for animats.
    • Graymail for Aug 11, 469 new messages for animats.
    • Graymail for Aug 10, 465 new messages for animats.
  59. I got them! by knaapie · · Score: 1

    Must've been some glitch in the system.
    Good news is I saved them for you!
    Just post your Email and I will forward them to you.

    --
    .sigh
  60. The spammers finally discovered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...That you're a deadbeat and your credit card is no good and your identity isn't worth stealing and your erectile dysfunction is cured and you have hair.

  61. I got my first spam mail is almost 2 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a private domain email address that I have been very careful never to put on the web or give out on sites/signups etc. I got my first spam in almost 2 years today.

    So something is up.

  62. RIP Spam King by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly, all of the Spam King's loyal subjects are in mourning over his death.

  63. Help us help you by Twisp · · Score: 1

    So I guess the key question here is: were most of the porn sites you visit frequently Dutch porn sites?

    If so, I think we have you answer.

  64. re where is your spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Russians are busy right now ddosing GA websites. When they are free you will be back in business.

  65. Olympics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    The Chinese spammers are too busy with the Olympics right now...

  66. It's August. Spammers have gone on holiday.. by Lord+Grumbleduke · · Score: 1

    .. soaking it up at the local caravan/trailer park due to all that money they're making from their get rich schemes.

  67. Spam on newsgroups down too by Jens+de+Smit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some newsgroup I regularly read got a lot of spam over the last month or so, but a couple days ago it just stopped. Possibly related...

  68. Re:Totally OT: Chinese youth in Olympics by Paranatural · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Not just the womens', the mens, while not as obvious, seemed really off to me as well.

    In greco-roman wrestling one guy thought it was so blatant he threw away his Bronze Medal.

  69. Re:Totally OT: Chinese youth in Olympics by LearnToSpell · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The American girls who won the gold and silver? Those American girls?

  70. Where are my car keys? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    I usually leave them on the counter when I come home from work at night, but now they are gone. I think I'll blog about it.

  71. Spammers are heading for the hills by aviators99 · · Score: 1

    Turns out that the bulk of spam has actually been sent by bigfoot creatures in Georgia (US). They recently lost one of their own, and the rest are a bit busy right now.

  72. Some people really want spam? by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

    I remember when Scott Richter was interviewed on the Daily Show, he said so many people craved the unsolicited email he sent. He said people would email asking him "Where are my offers?"

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
  73. They are doing you a great service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stopped getting e-mails from my public library system.
    This continued for several weeks, until I complained to my domain host.

    My domain host support representative claimed the same thing. (They "did not filter".)
    Two days after switching domain hosts, I started getting library system e-mails.

    The support people don't know what is going on "behind the scenes". (Plausible deny-ability?)

    (Maybe they did it to cut down on bot propagation? I now call that domain host an "enthusiastic father".)

    1. Re:They are doing you a great service... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      maybe a blacklist. Public library may have hosted its own email on a DSL IP? A blacklist isn't a "filter" if the host can't connect.

  74. Try forwarding spam through ISP by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe you could forward some spam from, say, a gmail account to your address in question. If it doesn't make it through to your server then you have a definitive record to confront your ISP with. Or, if they do get through, maybe you should buy a lottery ticket because your the luckiest admin on slashdot!

    1. Re:Try forwarding spam through ISP by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could forward some spam from, say, a gmail account to your address in question. If it doesn't make it through to your server then you have a definitive record to confront your ISP with. Or, if they do get through, maybe you should buy a lottery ticket because your the luckiest admin on slashdot!

      Sorry, this is a stupid idea.

      Most of my spam filtering rules completely ignore the content of the message itself, and focus entirely on where it came from and how it was sent. If you forward spam to me from a legitimate account, it probably won't be blocked. This is by design. There's a chance it might still be blocked if it triggers enough content rules, but most spammers are pretty adept at working around the content filters.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:Try forwarding spam through ISP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of forwarding spam, it might be better to use the GTUBE

  75. They are sending it all to us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yesterday, we were receiving more than twice the usual volumes of spam. Botnets with huge runs of "Auto Identification Card" and "Your Flight Ticket Online Nxxxxxxx" bearing trojans in attached .zip files.

    Still, what's an extra 100,000 spams between friends?

  76. I just checked one of our Ironport Servers by Phil_at_EvilNET · · Score: 3, Informative

    In a 24 hour period we've gone from a peak of about 75,000 messages at 9pm CST last night to a low of 40,000 messages incoming today, 97.3% of which are spam. Total for the last 24 hours on that single Ironport (we have 4 in production and one in the lab) is 1.4 Million attempted messages, of which 36.1 thousand were clean.

    So all things taken into consideration, consider yourself fortunate. We're still seeing a trend that indicates that over 97% of all incoming mail is garbage.

    -Phil

    --
    To avoid corruption, one must remain dishonest.
  77. Here's a thought... by swordgeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not too-well publicized, but the Russian Business Network (AKA spammer filth) have been using (renting?) a large chunk of their botnet space to attack Georgia. Here's a bit of detail.

    Maybe they just didn't have enough bandwidth to spam the planet AND take down Georgia's systems through a DOS.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:Here's a thought... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      It's not too-well publicized, but the Russian Business Network (AKA spammer filth) have been using (renting?) a large chunk of their botnet space to attack Georgia.

      Maybe you have that backwards. Suppose that the botnet is actually a military project, and that high-ranking government figures have been renting it to spammers. Further suppose that they're reallocating resources to the war effort at the moment.

      Honestly, that sounds a whole lot more plausible than the idea of spammers voluntarily helping their countrymen.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:Here's a thought... by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      It's an interesting idea, but no. Not likely.

      RBN operates across several countries. They're an organised crime gang, with the emphasis on organised. Theye guys have set up a massive system for DOSing targets, and are operating on a by-hire basis. If they have a chunk of botnet space that's not leased at a given moment, they'll use it to extort money from victims themselves. I'm sure that if the Russian government were involved, they would be paying the RBN. It just seems unlikely that the Russian government is the sole source behind the biggest botnet generator in the world.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  78. Hard to tell if I lost 200 SPAM emails. by Zarjazz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My personal server gets a few more mails than the poster.

    # of SPAM Week Ending
      172709 Aug ** (only 5-day stats)
      198878 Aug 10
      217882 Aug 3
      207318 Jul 27
      230533 Jul 20
      265463 Jul 13
      311635 Jul 6
      450349 Jun 29
      311850 Jun 22
      225500 Jun 15
      317484 Jun 8

    Make of those stats what you will ...

  79. Spam as a system status check by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

    I've had a few dips in Spam traffic in the past. Same thing as the OP: own domain, own filtering options. Oddly, Spam has become a continous stream of noise that we notice if it's absent. Like someone living in a big city, accustomed to sounds, if it went silent, you'd run to a window to look out to make sure you're not the Omega Man.

    1. Re:Spam as a system status check by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      I bet if an Omega Man event happens, the last one still gets spam.

      I Am Legend would have been a lot less exciting if instead of zombie-people it were zombie-computers though.

  80. Appropriate quote from 'Leon' by antek9 · · Score: 1

    "I like these calm little moments before the storm."

    To story submitter: Watch out. The communication disruption can only mean one thing: ----- no carrier

    --
    A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
    Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
  81. Post your address by BarC0d3z · · Score: 2, Funny

    Post your email address here and I'll make sure things get back to normal for you.

  82. Here ya go, we can fix that! by pr0nitor · · Score: 1
    Heh..
    The Pr0nitor Erotic Picture Viewer Software from Pr0nware Inc promises to

    "Bring YOUR Erotica to Life with the Power of Pr0nimation!"

    :0)

    --
    The Power of Pr0nimation in the Palm of Your Hand! Pr0nitor by Pr0nware
  83. I know the answer... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    I'm getting it all. Please stop.

    WTF did you do?

    Thanks for nothing. My spam volume went up 20% from 7/9 - 7/11 and stayed at that level. My missed spam want from about 5% of total to about 10% of total. I now get about 600 messages a day, with about 450-500 trapped as spam, and about 40 as ham. I used to get about 25 spam a day that leaked through, most the same thing I'm too lazy to write a rule for. Now I get 50-60 missed spam a day, somewhat annoying. A bad hit rate.

    I also get a lot of newsletters marked as spam via DCC. Don't get me started on the l@m0rs who forget they subscribed to something and mark it spam in their inbox... Sheesh.

    ps- Don't let the government get too involved in this. They make it worse.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  84. Georgia/Russia conflict the culprit? by LoStMaTt · · Score: 1

    Maybe a ton of spam has been coming from parts of Russia and Georgia that are now under fire? Or spammers are too busy fighting?

  85. Send me your email address and I'll check it out by koafc2 · · Score: 1

    That's strange behavior. Well, if you send over your email address to me, I'll see if there's anything strange going with it.

  86. SPF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds like the workings of SPF - check www.openspf.org If everyone got rid of all their spam filters and used SPF we would be rid of 90%+ of all SPAM as the SPF check will weed out all impersonations which is the bulk of all spam. The filters all work of faulty logic anyhow - an email with a picture and or link is not spam by definition if the sender is authentic. 90%+ of the spam I receive has no images or more than one link but it's pretty much all impersonations.

    1. Re:SPF by aviators99 · · Score: 1

      SPF would not even get rid of a fraction of a percent of spam. It only checks the e-mail address in the From: line against the SPF record (in DNS TXT) for the domain claimed by that e-mail address to make sure the last hop is an authorized sender. It's not the case that 90% of the spammers use someone else's domain in the From: line. It's just as easy to make up a fake domain. The e-mail address in the From: line isn't even seen by most people. The forgery that often goes on is in the "pretty name", which is what most mail readers display. SPF doesn't check that, and there really isn't a way to check that.

    2. Re:SPF by omnichad · · Score: 1

      90% is a little high when you consider how much spam goes out through GMail's servers.

  87. Russians by memeplex · · Score: 0

    The Russians are too busy with Georgian cyberwar.

  88. Black Hat by machine321 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They all just got back from Black Hat / Defcon, and they're still hung over.

  89. Here are some things to test by Dynedain · · Score: 1

    Although the most likely scenario is botnet shutdowns, here's some steps you can try if you still suspect some new filtering in place:

    1. First check your message headers to see if there's anything new in there. If your ISP, webhost, or other intermediary is filtering, you'll probably see something in there indicating the messages as clean/safe and what filter marked them as such.
    2. Second, send yourself messages from multiple outside sources with the GTUBE string. This string is meant to trigger SpamAssassin so that it guarantees the message is marked as spam. Other filter systems respond to it as well. So you'll be able to tell if the message came through or not. http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/
    3. Third, if you're really ambitious, try forging an IP address to send yourself some messages from IPs on the major known blacklists. This should confirm if some filter is doing blacklist filtering, as some of the mail delivery systems (eg. Postfix) can do blacklist filtering without the need of an additional tool like SpamAssassin.
    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    1. Re:Here are some things to test by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      Second, send yourself messages from multiple outside sources with the GTUBE string. This string is meant to trigger SpamAssassin so that it guarantees the message is marked as spam. Other filter systems respond to it as well. So you'll be able to tell if the message came through or not. http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/

      That would cause problems if Google renamed YouTube to GTUBE.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:Here are some things to test by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Why would it be a problem?

      If you actually looked at the link you'd see it is a long specialized string that would never be accidentally created. GTUBE is just the name.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    3. Re:Here are some things to test by kayditty · · Score: 1

      Since he runs his own mail-server, he can actually USE another IP address to send mail to his MX, but it is not possible to "forge an IP address" over TCP, or, at least, it is very statistically impossible.

  90. Teehee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe your ISP is a victim of the recent DNS vulnerabilities, and someone spoofing their domain is now getting all your spam ;-).

  91. botnets down? by ljaszcza · · Score: 1

    Well, some of the botnets may be down. This is from the Inq. MANAGED SERVICES PROVIDER Easynet is currently suffering a 'major outage', meaning that many customers are unable to browse or connect to some sites. LJJ

  92. Pretty normal by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Still at 250,000 a day for us. Would you like some of it to make up for your lack?

  93. Here's how to fix your problem! by phozz+bare · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Publish your email address right here on Slashdot. Within a few days I guarantee your spam levels will be right back to normal!

  94. Catchall change? by s7uar7 · · Score: 1

    Could the configuration of the catchall address have changed? Is it possible that emails sent to unconfigured mailboxes were previously delivered but are now be being dropped? I'm not seeing any decrease in the spam received by domains where I host the email with Google.

  95. I've actually seen a bit of an uptick by hellfire · · Score: 1

    I've been getting a whole bunch of CNN top ten news stories spam (seriously, they are NOT from CNN but they look convincing at first glance), a bunch of fake news story spam, and an increase in "you have a greeting card" spam. The funny thing is the uptick also coincides with the whole Russia-Georgia conflict.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:I've actually seen a bit of an uptick by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Actually, they ARE from CNN - it's just that all of the links have been changed before it got sent out as spam. They're too lazy to write their own gibberish, so now they're subscribing to a newsletter that almost nobody actually subscribes to in hopes that someone will be convinced that they are a subscriber.

  96. My domains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My usual 6500/day has dropped to about 5000 just recently. By far the greatest number (est. 20%) coming through are the recent News Feed spam (evolving: CNN > BBC > MSNBC) and if those are discounted, the drop is even more spectacular.
    I wonder if someone found a way to deactivate a set of spam zombies, or if putting spammers in jail is helping.

  97. To be sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you really think it's being blocked, just send a bunch of spam to yourself and see if it gets through.

  98. A communications disruption... by ClientNine · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... can mean only one thing: INVASION.

  99. My spam fighting recipe and some theories by dberstein · · Score: 1

    I have a similar setup, but got tired of content filters at the MTA level. My solution was to configure Postfix (my MTA) to abide more closely by RFCs (specifically for ELO|HELO commands) and install postgrey (`aptitude install postgrey`). Of course ensure you're not an open relay.
    These measures decreased the number of spam arriving at my inbox by 90%. The spam that reaches my mailbox is handled by my MUA (Mail.app currently). The volume is low enough for me to check if its working. It does! As it was already commented read your mail logs... they make a fun read!
    As for your sudden decrease of mostly spam incoming emails, some theories:
    1. Some big telco closed port 25 for residential customers?
    2. The recent DNS saga called sysadmins around the globe to check their servers and apply security patches and perhaps close open relays.

  100. Same thing happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the same thing happen to me about 2 years ago. However, it just so happened to coincide with my brother searching for a new gun, my dad researching explosive tip bullets that his brother told him about, and me looking at satellite photos of site R (google it). Since we were already sending out a boatload of encrypted traffic (e-mails, tor, etc), I'm sure that the NSA was already watching our internet connection. All the sudden they see from one IP address unencrypted web traffic consisting of site R, bullets, guns, exploding, all within about 5 hours of each other. The next day, no spam.

    I didn't see any spam until my dad was talking to his brother on the phone about it, and an hour later I got 4 pieces of spam. That was about 6 months ago, and I still haven't seen any since.

    I would like to thank the government for filtering my spam for me, top notch job they're doing.

  101. Where are mod points when I need them? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    Somebody, please, mod this up. The parent just solved the problem, now he can know if someone else is dropping his spam.

  102. Google Changed Access to SMTP Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google changed access to their smtp.google.com server. It it now no longer possible to authenticate directly to smtp.gmail.com (port 25) from many Comcast, and other ISP accounts, to send email.

    This change was made last Friday, which explains why you're receiving less spam. Now, spammers may have signed up for Google apps - registering their own domain name, hence spam would not come from gmail accounts.

    So, with this port blocked, how does one send email via MTA (Mail Transport Agent) to a Google hosted account? They have to authenticate smtp.gmail.com:587 Note the port change 587.

    You'll get some spam in a few weeks, when spammers figure this change out.

    Regards,

    Mike

  103. Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've a copy of all of them in my mailbox

  104. Except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where it's coming from is usually a significant clue to whether it's spammy, e.g. whether the sender is reverse DNS-able, SPF checks, etc.

    A piece of spam forwarded by a legit server will look less like spam than the same block of content sent from an infected PC in a botnet.

  105. Infected PC are offline during summer ^_^ by Kirys · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most spam is sent by bot-nets, mostly composed by infected pc of workplaces, school and private homes. In many countries during the second and third week of August many schools and workplaces are closed so their pc are just turned off, this mean that the bot-nets have less active nodes and so are less effective. I do receive less spam too but I think that it will be back to the sad old amount at the end of the summer :(

    --
    Unluckily Murphy was right.
    1. Re:Infected PC are offline during summer ^_^ by benicillin · · Score: 1

      i have a feeling this is the real reason. great thinking outside the box.

      --
      "i stand on the edge of destruction" -shai hulud
  106. My Spam Is Gone Too by hypnozooid · · Score: 1

    My spam box in gmail usually has over ten thousand emails. I recently checked my email, and noticed that I had 15 spam messages in the box. I assumed that gmail must have accidentally deleted all of them after 30 days or something like that (I'd been getting error messages before that, so I assumed something had happened to my account), but I've been checking it every day, and the number keeps going down. I have 5 right now. Usually when I click on it, the entire first page is from that day, sometimes that hour, but now they're all from weeks ago.

  107. YOU are actually a spammer! by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 0

    You are actually a spammer, trying to convince people that it is once again safe to visit indiscriminate websites and give out your email address to everybody and their dog. I am not falling for your tricks!

  108. Spam for a high-profile target 56% reduced by burnitdown · · Score: 1

    I help administer this domain:

    http://www.anus.com/

    It has been around since 1995, had addresses posted to newsgroups, thousands of fake addresses, etc.

    We have experienced a 56% drop in spam volume since last Thursday.

  109. Russian gov't pointed their botnets at Georgia by commodore73 · · Score: 1

    The Russian government has probably just temporarily pointed their botnets at Georgia.

  110. It could be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could be alerting people that someone in their household is addicted to pr0n, with an appropriate example.

  111. Re:Totally OT: Chinese youth in Olympics by Tridus · · Score: 1

    Probably, which is why awards shouldn't given out in these judged "sports". Its just too open to corruption.

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  112. Where is my daily dose of Spam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, the Russians are at war so they have redeployed every botnet's at their disposal to the Georgians and Chinese are busy winning medals! So, Netizens -- i say enjoy it while it lasts!!

  113. It's a sad day by krazytekn0 · · Score: 1

    When a lack of spam makes people worry that something is wrong!

    --
    Not all life is cyber. Extra Income
  114. No spam??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mailbox just got 5 CNN updates about it.

  115. Four words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't ask, don't tell.

  116. CNN spam by genner · · Score: 1

    All the CNN spam stopped for me. Was getting nailed that last few days and now not one.

  117. Re:Totally OT: Chinese youth in Olympics by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

    Remember that the judges have in their minds a picture of what is perfect. It just happens to be that for women's gymnastics, perfections is a small little girls doing the routine. They are lighter, more flexible, and less effected by what is going on around them (younger minds they worry less).

    Ontopic:

    Maybe the spam servers in China are turned off or being put to other uses? And as others have said, the Russian server are attacking Georgia.

  118. Something did change... by r_cerq · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've just checked my work's logs (an ISP). The number of hits in the spam taggers fell from 12/sec to 3/sec earlier this week.

    So either we're identifying less spam, or there is in fact less of it.

    1. Re:Something did change... by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

      My spam rate has also gone down in the past week or so. Not as much as the original post, but about the same as the parent. Something has obviously changed. Taking a quick look at my spam box, it looks like most of the usual content is still there. Maybe the spammers have just taken up a "less is more" attitude?

    2. Re:Something did change... by cyborman · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, I found it all. Seems my spam box has more than doubled in the ammount per day in the last week alone.

  119. Spambots are being used to Attack Georgia by rjschwarz · · Score: 1

    That is the explanation the comes to mind. The spambots that are normally feeding you spam have been retasked. They'll be back soon enough.

  120. Coincidence ?? by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

    Our e-mail British Telecom was unavailable for about 18 hours until about 0600 this morning.

  121. Watch out. by dreemernj · · Score: 1

    It's the calm before the storm.

    --
    1 (short ton / firkin) = 89.1432354 slugs / keg
  122. Why not use a Spam Free Email service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I finally had enough of all this Spam on my Yahoo account as many as 300 per day, I switched about 30 days ago to mail.enterto.com and have still not received 1 Spam.

  123. Lucky bastard by Fleeced · · Score: 1

    I work at (and partly own) a domain registrar... even my latest address gets lots of spam. In fact, my latest address, which ISN'T harvestable (the others appear as tech contacts in whois) has been getting increasing amounts of spam, despite being relatively secret.

    It's annoying, because it's a "private" domain name. As much as I hate spam, I can deal with it... but I'd rather not explain to my 70yo parents why they are receiving email about people having sex with animals :(

    PS: This is a serious problem - please don't mod this funny.

  124. Let go of the Cold War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe if we didn't try to make every neighbor of Russia a member of NATO (It isn't aimed at Russia, really! Relax!) they wouldn't have gotten nervous to the point of doing this. The definition of "North Atlantic" has been stretched to the limit of reason. Between NATO and that bullshit missile defense system in Eastern Europe (Iran, yah, right) I don't blame them for being pissed, we would've done the same thing.

    I guess keeping the Cold War alive is better than having voters pay attention to the fact that they can't pay for gas or their homes.

  125. the kings of Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of us Spam kings got together and decided that you just weren't buying enough from us.

    Why should we waste our time on you?

  126. The Real Solution - CNN Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I personally just figure it would be all the comprimised boxes that were sending you spam got the CNN Alert message which took away the spammers control of the box and instead gave it to another spammer who didn't have your email address yet.

    Sounds good on paper anyway!

  127. SpamAssassin Rocks! by rawb300 · · Score: 1

    It could be that you have auto-learning turned on in SpamAssassin and it has started scoring spam higher. This resulting scores could be over your auto-discard threshold. If this is the case and you still want to get everything turn the threshold way up.

  128. Our gateways...no difference by duplicate-nickname · · Score: 1

    My spam gateways process about 250,000 emails a day and I don't see any significant change over the past 30 days in spam volume (our "good" rate is about 5-6%). My guess is that your ISP is now doing some basic RBL connection filtering that they didn't tell you about. Either that, or they have always been doing the filtering but it was broken until this week.

    --

    ÕÕ

  129. Attention is elsewhere... by Zooperman · · Score: 1

    Yeah, sounds like the normal spambots have been redirected to the war with Georgia. Once Russia blows them back into the Stone Age, the spam flow will be back up to its normal levels.

    --
    Zooperman
  130. OT - your sig by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    just kidding ;)

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  131. Post your email address. by ewrong · · Score: 1

    If you're worried about it just post your email address here and we'll do our best to get normal service resumed for you.

  132. Comcast's port 25 blocking by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    Comcast has started to block port 25 usage on its residential customers.

  133. When all the humans are gone... by RobertSeattle · · Score: 1

    ...The earth will just be a bunch of servers spamming one another until the power goes out.

  134. Obligatory by T3Tech · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are you sure your server didn't switch to spam, egg, sausage and spam mode? That's not got much spam in it.

    --
    Of course I didn't RTFA... why would I do that? You really are new here aren't you? Don't let my UID fool you.
  135. Simple, you bought the male "enhancement" pills by sjf · · Score: 1

    The spammers are quite reasonable. Once your male has been enhanced, they don't bother trying to sell you any more.
    Whatever you do though, don't confuse them by buying the bust enhancement cream as well...

  136. Already going on. by Medievalist · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seriously though ... if spammers started turning up dead where would the police even begin their investigation? There's only a pool of what, half a billion suspects?

    Spammers and virus writers employed by spammers to create their zombie pools have been turning up dead for almost two years now.

    1. Re:Already going on. by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Most of those are about the "Spam King" that killed himself and his family.

    2. Re:Already going on. by SgtSnorkel · · Score: 1

      Where do I donate to this effort? Do they take PayPal?

    3. Re:Already going on. by swilde23 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That doesn't really tell you much though (except for the fact that a prominent spammer died recently).
      I would try looking at something more like this for information about spammers dying in the past few years: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=spammer+found+dead&sa=N&lnav=m&scoring=t

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand this sig, and those that beat up people who do.
    4. Re:Already going on. by Mr.+Firewall · · Score: 1

      Spammers and virus writers employed by spammers to create their zombie pools have been turning up dead for almost two years now.

      Two bodies, and one of them by his own hand. Not exactly a trend... unfortunately....

      --
      In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
    5. Re:Already going on. by Hugonz · · Score: 1

      Maybe they were all really really old?

    6. Re:Already going on. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

      Nice query link; I'll be using that trick! Thanks!

    7. Re:Already going on. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

      Spammers and virus writers employed by spammers to create their zombie pools have been turning up dead for almost two years now.

      Two bodies, and one of them by his own hand. Not exactly a trend... unfortunately....

      I suppose if you didn't bother to do anything more than glance at the search page you'd get that impression.

      Maybe if I was more public spirited I'd do the thirty minutes of research required to show you the trend, but honestly I don't care enough. Wait, here, try this, which was supplied by another poster who has better Google-fu.

  137. That's what happened at Netflix! by barfy · · Score: 1

    They can't get out those DVD's cuz of all the spam.

  138. Mod parent up... uh... by argent · · Score: 1

    PS: This is a serious problem - please don't mod this funny.

    They won't let me mod it up "Serious".

  139. Guess where it's coming from? by The+Swirve · · Score: 1

    So Russian invades Georgia. Cyber-war ensues. Big problems with hosting and internet access in Georgia. And your spam mysteriously slows right down. ... huh

    1. Re:Guess where it's coming from? by Gerzel · · Score: 1

      If it is provable that Georgia is the one supplying the spam then I'd fully support the Ruskies.

      That Nigerian Prince has to be stopped!

  140. I can fix this! by axehind · · Score: 1

    I can fix this for you! Whats the affected email addresses? ;-)

  141. Picked by filters every one... by Gerzel · · Score: 1

    When will they ever learn?

    When will they ever learn?

    When will they evver learn?

    Where have all the filters gone?
    On to Microsoft Servers everyone...

    When will they ever learn?

    When will they ever learn?

    When will they evver learn?

  142. How ironic by Nephrite · · Score: 1

    Users missing their spam. Can't live with it, can't live without it, eh?

    1. Re:How ironic by rahlquist · · Score: 1

      The problem is, when someone upstream from you starts filtering the spam they are just as likely to get ham and dump legit emails. So a sudden drop in spam is never a good thing.

      --
      Sick of stupidity? http://www.patentlystupid.com
  143. Still sending... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I blast mail that is CAN-SPAM compliant most people would consider my drops SPAM. I haven't stopped sending or even slowed. Quite possibly you clicked an unsub link for a marketer that had you subbed on a bunch of lists and you are now seeded on the suppression list. Contrary to what blackmailholes will tell you, if you unsub from a legit sender we will stop sending to you. We don't want to waste resources on people smart enough to unsub. They probably won't buy any snake oil. The only reason the blackmailholes tell you to just forward them mail and not unsub is so that they can blacklist marketers and charge them to be removed. And while most of them allow you to be removed from the blacklist for free, if you pay attention you will notice most offer expedited removal for a donation.

  144. ... they were looking for a soul to steal? by agbinfo · · Score: 1

    n/t

  145. Spam never sleeps by Ziest · · Score: 1

    Yep, I'm still getting my standard quota of spam.

    --
    Another day closer to redwood heaven
  146. Either of the two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are eaither dreaming or its the eye of the storm

  147. Old News by lRem · · Score: 1
    --
    Always put off dealing with time-wasting morons. If you would like to know how... I'll get back to you
  148. Wow, this could actually be real by scabpicker · · Score: 1

    My spam filer scanned about 300,000 messages less than it normally does yesterday. It's really possible some botnets got disabled or are otherwise occupied, because that's a 20% drop.

    --
    _this is not a signature_
  149. That's right around when... by jhe · · Score: 1

    Netflix went dark. Maybe your spammers are all using their servers. They claim to be up now so maybe your spam will be back.

  150. Volume here not unusual. by domatic · · Score: 1

    Nothing radical here although we are in a somewhat low volume period. At worst, our domain sees ~70,000/day. At the moment we're getting ~/22,000/day. It isn't uncommon to see any point between those two extremes.

  151. You have a net upstream by rahlquist · · Score: 1

    Check with whoever is directly upstream of your server, they are likely filtering and dumping by RBL. Almost EVERY shared hosting service does this now whether they deny it or not, most will gladly lie if you ask and in some cases mom an pop hosting that has their servers in larger data centers get filtered by the larger data center.
    Today's Totals
    Processed: 5,230 20.6Mb
    Clean: 149 2.8%
    Viruses: 0 0.0%
    Top Virus: None
    Blocked files: 0 0.0%
    Others: 0 0.0%
    Spam: 64 1.2%
    High Scoring Spam: 5,017 95.9%

    Totals from my domains for the day.

    --
    Sick of stupidity? http://www.patentlystupid.com
  152. ~400 in the past 12 hours here by jdoss · · Score: 1

    >1100 in the past 36 hours. Running a small business, here, as well.

  153. Re:Totally OT: Chinese youth in Olympics by drachenstern · · Score: 1

    Yeah, those two. You'll have to admit though that the judges were rather overly judgemental of those same two young women, and that they really did do a much better job than they were given credit for.

    I mean, here's the thing. When the chinese girl almost fell off the beam, and she scored higher than most of the other girls, how did they come up with that score?

    --
    2^3 * 31 * 647
  154. NO spam here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm using a gmail account as my primary email. And my spam count has dropped down to less than 10 a day... But they're getting past googles spam checker now.

  155. All your spam has been coming to me instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...damn you!!!

  156. Have you checked elsewhere for changes? by RJFerret · · Score: 1

    According to this Slashdot article, women get less spam than men, maybe you should check for internal changes rather than external changes? Or was there a bad side effect from an enlargement offer you responded to?

  157. obvious really by ajrs · · Score: 1

    someone has hacked your dns server and is now getting all of your spam

  158. As Yoda would say by Widowwolf · · Score: 1

    I feel a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. My v1agra pills , i cannot sell.

    --
    ~~"Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~~Dennis Miller
  159. Catch-all by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    My primary domain used to be a catchall and I'd create a new username with each new contact I dealt with. (I still get spam resulting from registering with 321studios, and participating in a caucus now is getting me regular Hallmark Trojans.)

    Until one day when suddenly my spam filters became complete ineffective and I was deluged with over 3000 messages in one day. Turned out my ISP disabled my procmail filters because they were using too many system resources. I decided to switch that domain to a non-catchall and only let through the usernames I'd already defined. (The aforementioned two are going to be cut off.)

    Until today, root still owned my ~/.procmailrc file and denied me write permissions on it. Good thing I own my user directory so I could remove it. If they had set it as immutable, I could still run procmail with an alternate rc file. 'Cause even without a catch-all, I still need to filter the spam sent to my ISP username@domain.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  160. It works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey don't knock it till you've tried it. I ordered some of that penis enlargement cream, and rubbed it on. The next day I was huge... I mean HUGE.

    The only problem is the hand I rubbed it on with is now twice as large as the other hand :(

  161. Same thing happened to me a while ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the same thing happen to me a while back. One day I happened to notice that the spam had slowed way down - just a couple a day, down from dozens - and never really picked up again.

  162. Dont Worry Sir I'm From The Internet by someonetookmynicknam · · Score: 1

    Sir, can you give us some details about how it happenned? where were at that time? Which porn site were you browsing? have you noticed anything suspicious in the subnet recently? my god!!! it could be the terrorists!!! hurry give us your email address....

  163. Maybe ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... someone dragged an anchor.

    Seriously, I've never really had a problem with spam. Maybe two or three a day. But this Tuesday, I got a batch of about 60 bogus bounced e-mails. Most appear to have binaries or other suspect materials attached (Damn! This Linux system just refuses to run any of them.). Now its back to two or three a day.

    I'm guessing that this is in some way asociated with the Russia v Georgia cyber war. But I can't figure why your volume would go down. Unless your spam was coming from Georgia.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Maybe ... by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      That anchor thing actually works. I work for one of the major anti-spam vendors, and cable cuts do tend to correlate with small drops in the spam flow, particularly for spam that tends to have a geographical connection and the right cable gets cut. For example, if Nigeria dropped off the Internet, the volume of 419/lottery scams would go way down.

      We haven't seen any drop in spam, though. Interesting that some people are seeing such a big drop, but it's not a global phenomenon.

  164. Spam as a service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems spam is likely a service. Someone pays the botnet to spam for X months, once they stop paying, they stop spamming for you.

    I've seen this on/off behavior many times to my mailbox. It's very eerie, but sure enough, the spam comes back after someone contracts them out again.

  165. No more bald men with ED!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real reason is that there are no more bald men suffering from ED. Spammers have thrown in the towel.

    1. Re:No more bald men with ED!!! by bratwiz · · Score: 1

      Hey, mod this up, its funny!

  166. penal enlargement by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    Maybe they realized I don't need a penal enlargement and don't want to meet women (I'm married)?

    So you're saying, basically, that having married a woman, you've realized you don't like them, and that this situation has been punishing enough that onlookers take pity on you rather than giving you a hard time?

    I'm happy to say my marriage hasn't had that effect...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  167. Got a Fix by gbh1935 · · Score: 0

    Post your email address here and we will test it for ya :)

  168. Reduced for me too =) by gilbertopb · · Score: 1

    From >150-200/day to 5-15/day. This includes Yahoo, Gmail and Hotmail (two accounts in each). I found interesting the China and Russia botnets idea. Meanwhile, where I found a do-it-yourself-ready-kit to create my own worldwide botnet?

    --
    Information technology means all information.
  169. Nope.. by Zerbey · · Score: 1

    Still filtering 95% of the messages I receive out as spam here, no let down. Others have noted a large Dutch operation was shut down but it's not affecting me!

    I turned all my machines off for 35 days recently during a house move. I was hoping one positive would be it'd get my damn e-mail off of some of the lists. Alas, no. The very first thing that connected to my machine when I turned it back on was a spammer. Typical. I still bounce spam sent to an address I've not used in 10 years so I really shouldn't be surprised.

  170. Lucky you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucky you, yesterday I received about 45000 "Undelivered message" emails. Seems a spammer put my email address in the From: of his spam.

  171. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a lot fewer spam messages on my Yahoo and Gmail accounts.

    Maybe the spammers made enough money and stopped.

  172. Mail filter results by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Following is a sampling of my mail filter results.

      We haven't noticed any decrease in mail, other than normal fluctuation.  Possibly your ISP has done something to slow your spam rate.  They may be intercepting and filtering port 25 traffic, or even just monitoring that traffic and dropping the spam traffic at the edge router(s).  It's even possible that there's something wrong with your mail server, and it's just not delivering everything for some reason.

    Date            Mail    Spam
    Aug 14 2008     55179   52529 (95%)
    Aug 13 2008     53440   51097 (95%)
    Aug 12 2008     55059   52028 (94%)
    Aug 11 2008     50009   47292 (94%)
    Aug 10 2008     35192   33796 (96%)

    Jul 31 2008     42680   40146(94%)
    Jul 30 2008     46390   43471 (93%)
    Jul 29 2008     42933   40344 (93%)

    Jun 23 2008     40326   37888 (93%)
    Jun 22 2008     29717   28882 (96%)

    May 31 2008     13938   13391 (96%)
    May 30 2008     56695   53343 (94%)

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  173. Be happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is like getting worried because your stalker has found someone else to follow.

  174. Well, no wonder. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    You never buy anything.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  175. You're doing something wrong by DrVomact · · Score: 1

    "I have my own domain, which has its own email server, where I receive all my personal email. I've been getting about 800 emails a day, of which perhaps 20 are real. Suddenly, Sunday ...

    You've got your own domain, and you get 780 pieces of trash a day? Why bother with the domain, just use hotmail. I've got my own domain, and I almost never get spam. First, I don't give out my "real" email except to trusted friends. Vendors I order stuff from, mailing lists, political organizations, etc. all get their very own special email address. So if I start getting spam directed to vendorname@myaddress, then I know who sold my address. I also revoke that address. I maintain an easy-to-remember series of throwaway addresses for casual purchases or communication with people I don't trust. Those just get changed on a monthly basis. Oh yeah, I also have the domain run through an anonymization service, so they can't even get my information by looking up the domain name. Problem solved.

    --
    Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
  176. Did you have a catch-all set up? Do you still? by sleeping+wolf · · Score: 1

    I have a different hosting provider that offered a catch-all address for a long time, which I used for my email. I started receiving huge quantities of dictionary spam, and after a while the provider decided there would be no more catch-all addresses, and my spam was greatly reduced. (I wasn't really using the functionality anyhow.)

  177. I don't think they disappeared by lawn.ninja · · Score: 1

    I'd be willing to bet they are being used in a military campaign currently.

  178. I'm losing legitimate messages too by BuckoA51 · · Score: 1

    During the week I emailed a link to my own blog to my dad at work. I'd blogged about some errand I ran for his friend and he wanted to show them. After three attempts we gave up trying to transmit the message, the message would send, but never arrive, and I received no notification that it had failed to transmit. My dad even checked with his technician to see if it was in the spam-trap at his work, it was not. I tried sending it again to various e-mail addresses I own (such as my Yahoo one) and on to my mother. The message was never received. I rang my ever-so-helpful ISP tech support department and asked if they could trace the message as it went through the SMTP server "No we cannot" was their reply. Anyway, after a few more experiments I found that if I removed the URL the message got transmitted fine. So I suspect there is some sort of increased effort by ISP's to filter spam, that might actually be filtering legitimate messages too. Then again I am with Virgin Media, who have a broken network anyway (I have proven that several of their routers are faulty but they still insist it's my anti-virus or firewall).

  179. Internet must be broken right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean I'm not getting my mail so the internet must be broken. I get a lot of mail all spam but that spam shows my internet is working!

    (haha thats what's its like to talk with parents or workin Customer Support, when people who are clueless call and wonder why they aren't getting spam)

    hmm sounds like this fellow.

  180. It's dropped for me by DeanFox · · Score: 1

    I was getting 2000 a month. For the last few days I've been getting maybe 5-7 a day. Big drop. I noticed it too.

  181. Spam King is Dead by ilovesymbian · · Score: 1

    The Spam King is dead, long live the Spam King.

  182. It's Nikita's fault by Oloryn · · Score: 1

    They've created a new Section that's giving a new meaning to the term 'SpamAssassin'. They aren't having to recruit operatives from death row, however, as there is a waiting list of mail admins wanting to join up. It's odd, though, how many of them are volunteering for the 'Torture Twins' position.

  183. Didn't they call it suicide? by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Not that I'm doubting the word of the government authorities, mind you.

    They *could* be being honest for a change.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  184. That is NOT the right thing, either, you're probed by arete · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying the Qmail way is better - but your way has a significant flaw. It gives immediate notification of valid and invalid accounts, without any server ownership verification whatsoever (the qmail way at least verifies a valid return-mail-path)

    Now, what WOULD be great would be if MTAs did SPF-checking and all (including systems using qmail as an MTA) did immediate failure on an SPF-failure (since that has nothing to do with the local accounts and everything to do with the sender.)

    Then no one with a valid SPF record would ever get inappropriate bounces from such a server, and the qmail-security-delay would only be relevant to people without SPF records. (Heck, you could add text in the bounce that said 'if this bounce isn't from a message you sent, get SPF!')

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  185. This is your ISP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is your ISP. To investigate this issue we need you to send your login id, password, and domain name to anonymous.coward@slashdot.org, along with a paypal payment of $100 in service fees.

    To protect your privacy, you should not send this information to anyone other than us.

  186. Re:Totally OT: Chinese youth in Olympics by LearnToSpell · · Score: 2, Informative

    What are you talking about?

    Beam scores:
    Liukin - 16.125
    Johnson - 16.050
    Yang - 15.750

    I swear, I've never heard anybody but Americans complain about judging in an event that they WON.

  187. graph by drDugan · · Score: 1

    spams per day, first 15 days of august:

    http://208.69.42.194/scpfiles/1218826175.jpg

    last few days do not look much different

  188. I have noticed the same thing. by rezac · · Score: 0

    I have my own domain also, and last couple of weeks my spam has gone from ~400/day to ~20/day. I have not changed any filtering, either. I have SpamAssasin running on the server side with some mild blacklist and white list filtering. All legit email seems to be getting through.

    --
    -- my sig got /.'d
  189. Maybe -- but do your research by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    A good way to complement spam source filtering thru greylisting is to block home/dynamic IPs, ranges where mail servers arent supposed to be, but where are the majority of personal pcs (that gets owned by botnets). Spamhaus PBL i.e. have this particular target (or zen that combines this one with other known sources of spam)

    IP ranges change, and there's nothing worse than getting assigned an IP that was previously in a dial-up pool.

    Some people are obsessed with getting rid of all spam -- I'm personally willing to accept a little bit of spam through, so long as that I don't trash any legitimate mail. Everyone has a different acceptable range for false positives or false negatives. Blocking those addresses will result in lost mail. Maybe not much for the average person ... but enough that I wouldn't outright block it ...

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Maybe -- but do your research by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      The good thing on using a centralized service like spamhaus is that your ISP or whoever owns that IP range can report that it isnt used for dynamic addresses anymore, and suddently all places using that service will accept again your mails. And at least some mailservers could report why are rejecting your mail.

      Is not perfect, but goes to the heart of the biggest source of spam today.

  190. Georgia by sneakyimp · · Score: 1

    The botnets are too busy attacking Georgia to keep sending you spam too.

  191. Why is it always about me? by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

    Why is it always all about you?

    Because I'm a selfish asshole, and proud of it.

  192. Perhaps someone decided . . . by Hasai · · Score: 1

    . . . to apply more "active" measures to the spam problem.

    . . . . Hey: I can dream, can't I?
    ];)

    --

    Regards;

    Hasai

  193. No Volume Reduction here by midnitewolf · · Score: 1

    Just went through the company's logs on the spam filter appliance to check the traffic, and we're still consistently filtering 3000 messages a day, Same as last month.

    Consider yourself lucky, I suppose... There doesn't seem to be any systemic reduction in spam volume. I'd recommend having another word with your ISP.

  194. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED! by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    Whooo! All the spam is gone! Bill Gates was right!! He did it!

    Sounds like an appropriate time for him to do a photo op on an aircraft carrier if you ask me!

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  195. Yes, you're right by Uomograsso · · Score: 1

    I'ma only seeing two dated 20th August. This is down from 10 on the day before. Alan

  196. News Alert! by Ninesmith · · Score: 1

    msnbc.com - BREAKING NEWS: Obama wins Olympic gold medal, drops out of Presidential race

  197. war? by mccabem · · Score: 1

    Just a guess, but it seems fairly logical that some or even all of the resources normally directed against us (or not normally directed) are now in use in the "cyber war" between Georgia and Russia and so now are being directed at each other. At least I'd say the dent that cyber war is causing in the net's available bandwidth is to blame.

    Obviously I'm considering (assuming actually) that somewhere between "a lot" and "most" spam comes (or is controlled) from that geographic region.

    I guess if we're still paying attention when that war is played out, we can check our spam filters again.

    -Matt

  198. More anecdotal confirmation by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    I, too, have noticed a decline in the overall amount of spam. My mail server runs SpamAssassin, but it's configured to dump spam into a quarantine box, rather than reject it outright. That makes it easy to count the amount that I get. I've never received tons and tons, but it's gone down from 100+ per day to maybe 20 or so. Still too many, but a significant drop.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  199. Yes, I can confirm this too by Nitromaroder · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here, in Germany, I've noticed this also: On my private mail server, the SPAM is almost gone (only 1-3 messages per day, instead of 20-30), at work I have similar experience: the amount of continuous SPAM per day is down to 1/10, but, every Thursday or Friday (since three weeks now), we get a huge wave of SMTP connections at ca. 4 pm CEST (from bot nets), which almost breaks down our internet connection. Both systems are using postfix+postgrey+amavis(spamassassin, dcc, razor, etc.). My suspicion: I am assuming my brothers are busy now with Georgia servers, so as long as the conflict in Caucasus is not over... :-P Kind regards, Denis

  200. Re:Totally OT: Chinese youth in Olympics by Y.A.A.P. · · Score: 1

    I swear, I've never heard anybody but Americans complain about judging in an event that they WON.

    Hunh. You make it sound like they're actually more concerned about fairness in judging than who wins.

    I can't imagine somebody doing something so damaging to the spirit of the Olympic games.

  201. seriously bit more information ? by johnjones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    well the first thing that scully would ask is ?

    where is the scientific evidence....

    so the serious question its nice that your spam level dropped but where/ip was it all coming from in the first place ?

    regards

    John Jones

    http://www.johnjones.me.uk

  202. RBL's? by Arterion · · Score: 1

    Your host may not consider RBL's to be "filtering". Maybe the hooked up to Spamhaus all the sudden. That'll cause a dramatic decrease in spam, but I can see why they might not call it "filtering" in the sense you're thinking.

    --
    "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
  203. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your spam are belong to us.

  204. It is the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    calm before the storm.

  205. It's The Singularity by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

    Prepare to have the night skies filled with UFOs of many different species, having a battle royale 6 miles above Detroit. The spam has stopped because even the demons that send most spam have scurried away to hide before the big one hits.

  206. The Big 3 Crackdown by Jammrock · · Score: 1

    Part of is Yahoo, Google and Hotmail cracking down on their spam and UCE policies. It's forcing ISPs and web hosts and email providers to crack down on their email policies so their server don't get blacklisted by, mainly, Yahoo.

  207. Get a friend? by mnslinky · · Score: 1

    Perhaps nobody likes you. Not even spammers. Did you recently contract some sort of virus? ;)

    Spam on my mail server has not waned.

  208. Here's where your spam went by buss_error · · Score: 3, Informative

    1. If you've made no configuration changes or patches in the past week, that pretty much lets out program error.

    2. If your ISP is saying they don't do spam filtering, then that pretty much lets that out too, unless your ISP is given to lying to you.

    3. Others point to the cyber war between Georga and Russia. I'd think that those folks would have their own bots not associated with spamming, but I can't prove that.

    4. It surpasses hope that all the sudden people cleaned up their pwon3d systems.

    5. My spam levels have not dropped appreciably, and I not only have my own domain, but allocations as well.

    6. I have noticed at times in the past that my spam levels do drop by 60, 70, even 80%. They always pick back up before too long. Enjoy a breif respite.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  209. Mmm by areusche · · Score: 1

    I ate it.

  210. Found It ... by AdiBean · · Score: 1

    And I have it all right here for you. If you'll just supply your email address as a reply to this post, I will send it along.

  211. If it's worth doing, it's worth doing at a profit. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... independent helpers ... have programs that you can download that do most of the work with minimal hassle.

    Hi. I'm a spammer working for the Patriotic Russian effort to defend South Ossetia from the imperialists of Georgia. If you want to help this patriotic effort I have written for you a tool to let you participate in our DDoS attack on Georgia's network. Just click THIS LINK to download the tool, then enter the decryption password to unpack and install it. The password is "ImASucker"

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  212. Let's double check... by galimore · · Score: 1

    What was your domain name again? ;)

  213. Maybe they were... by galimore · · Score: 1

    Using VMWare ESX server? ;)

  214. Maybe . . . . by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    Somewhere down the line someone implemented OpenBSD's spamd on a large scale. That'll teach the spammers but good.

  215. That spam must have come to me. by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

    For the last month or so I seen a double or more increase of spam on my mail server. According to my mail server stats my total incoming mail messages remained the same but spam increased 10% per week in the last four weeks. 50% of that spam is bad enough to be deleted outright but I scan it before it is deleted, 40% is in quarantine, and 10% is questionable for the user to view and provide me tune spam filter for spam/ham.
    We only have 24 people here since we are scientific research organization we have email address in many places like scientific publications so this is were most of our spam comes from.

  216. Maybe They're In Prison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully, someone has hunted down, shut down and locked up everyone responsible. F- spammers.

  217. I know why: I have all your spam by dindi · · Score: 1

    I have 30+ domains, and I have some catch-all's.... whatever@domain.com gets to me. Last week I had 12.000+ spam messages that is twelve thousand!

    So I guess you what you are missing is in my mail box. BTW I am using spamassassin, which misses around 100 a day, and occassionally puts one legit mails into my SPAM mail or SPAM-MAYBE mail ....

    well.... I hate email now ... I really do.

  218. Spam, spam, spam, spam, by neonsignal · · Score: 1

    "Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, baked beans, spam, spam, spam and spam."

    I guess it must have been one of those baked beans kind of days.

  219. for whatever it's worth by koantum · · Score: 1

    I've been wondering too. Getting maybe 5 percent of the spam I used to get. By the way, my ISP is BSNL-DataOne (that's in India).

  220. Greylisting is pointless now - and annoying by dbIII · · Score: 1
    First - unfortunately the spammers expect greylisting now and deal with it.

    Second - salesfolk and management are expecting instant communication from email now. If you implement greylisting it is only a matter of time before you have to explain why you are deliberately delaying communications. If you have a good relationship with the CEO or have the foresight to warn people that there will be some lag go ahead - otherwise expect angry reactions when people find out because THEIR email did not arrive until up to twenty minutes after a phone conversation asking for it. With some people five minutes would be long enough for them to storm in looking for the delay.

    It's annoying enough being at the sending end and having clients coming to you to complain about another organisations spam filtering system. There have been a few occasions where somebodies choice of twenty minute greylisting has resulted in angry phone calls between the sender, recipient and the poor sysadmin at the site sending the mail which can't get in. It's only when four people are wasting time that those that set broken policies get to notice.

  221. Same Here But... by idfubar · · Score: 0

    ...I've still been getting one or two messages a week to 'slashdot@', 'freshmeat@' and 'filezilla@'. Interestingly enough I haven't received messages to other addresses (e.g. 'sales@', 'marketing@') for quite some time. Also, my Gmail accounts still gets about 50 junk messages a day and my personal (alumni) forwarding address still gets one just about every day.

    --

    Rishi Chopra
    www.rishichopra.org
  222. Using VMWare? by robateastridge · · Score: 1

    Maybe their spam email servers were running 3.5p2? The fixed ISO just got released, so they'll be back up soon.

  223. My spam has gone too by GianOp · · Score: 1

    My spam has gone too yesterday... I don't know if this will last, but it really vanished.

  224. The RBN is currently busy, please hold the line. by w1z4rd · · Score: 1

    Chances are those botnets are being used against Georgia (or other targets) in the current Russian conflict. The Russian Business Network is currently busy... please hold the line.

  225. My spam load has also dropped amazingly this week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen the same thing with my spam load down 75% this week but I had trouble with a DNS change for a few days so I assumed they were being efficient and responding to the accidental mail rejection notices ?

  226. Same "problem", different time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I had the same "problem" around half a year ago (give or take a year), suddenly the amount of spam dropped significantly to almost zero and I immediately suspected someone had activated a spam filter without my knowledge. Which is something I would not want because I have a pretty good spam filter that still allows me to double-check to avoid false positives.

    I checked and double-checked all my e-mail providers, but spam filtering is off everywhere. Which still did not quite put my mind at ease, I was still afraid I was missing real e-mails.

    But since you have the same situation, I guess we were both just lucky to be listed on only a few major botnets that were suddenly killed.

  227. Probable Reason..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    Probable Reason: The spam you were getting dropped off because it was probably coming from one spammer who just got shut down.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  228. Re:Specialized addresses by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    I didn't have the energy to maintain the strength of your approach. I settled for a smaller suite of addresses, and when I suspected some vendor would be a Newsletter-Offender, then I parked them into the catchall acct.

    I had to decide a while ago to separate companies' mainline product/service divisions with their marketing gnomes in the basement.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  229. Re: $100 in service fees by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    "Thank you for your subscription!".

    Oh. Sorry. I renewed my subscription to Slashdot. Was I supposed to send it to you?

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  230. In 5 years... by hubert+weiss · · Score: 1

    First the bees now spam next year the humans.

  231. RBL's maybe the reason... by Mobius_6 · · Score: 0

    Your provider likely runs an rbl check at the smtp server level which is not always the same scanning mechanism - rbl's are continually updated and can be far more accurate at blocking spam if a host or set of hosts are blocked - it can very much seem like a sudden turn around in the amount of email you're getting because known spam sources are eventually blacklisted. So while your isp may not have actually changed anything at their server level the 3rd party rbl filters (spamcop, spamhaus, etc) are continually updating their own lists which directly affect your email.h

  232. Low Spam Count by Buzz_Light · · Score: 1

    When a man's spam count drops suddenly and unexpectedly, it's cause for concern!!

  233. Sorry dude by thewils · · Score: 1

    I have it - drop me your email address and I'll forward it to you.

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  234. Solution - I've been stealing it! by Geminii · · Score: 1

    I love it - I'm having spam spam spam spam spam spam spam false positive spam spam spam and spam!

  235. Spam by Hucko · · Score: 1

    Post your email and I'll fix that...

    --
    Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  236. Re:That is NOT the right thing, either, you're pro by nabsltd · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying the Qmail way is better - but your way has a significant flaw. It gives immediate notification of valid and invalid accounts, without any server ownership verification whatsoever (the qmail way at least verifies a valid return-mail-path)

    I don't see how letting spammers know that I'm not going to accept e-mail for "name.removethis@example.com" is a problem. If that means they stop beating on my mail server, great! But, believe me, no spammer is looking at the SMTP result messages they get.

    As for letting them know it's a valid e-mail address, you're assuming I accept the e-mail. If I reject it ('cause maybe it's spam?), then because of the fact that no spammer is looking at the SMTP result messages they get, they don't know whether the address is valid or not.

    Last, there is no way to "verify a valid return-mail-path". It's not possible. Sending an e-mail to the envelope-from address accomplishes no kind of verification...it merely pisses off somebody who might not have been involved in the sending of the e-mail. Think about it...if spam claims to be from "valid-address@example.com", then any check you make says "yes, that's a real address that accepts delivery". The problem is that it isn't the right address.

    By responding only in the SMTP error code, you really do solve pretty much all the problems. If the server talking to you really is trying to send legitimate e-mail from an e-mail address that it is supposed to be a relay for, then the error will eventually get back to the true sender. If the server is an open relay and the message is spam, then the error ends up going nowhere, which is good.

    Then, by shutting down all open relays, spam levels would drop to nothing. The problem is that most of the "open relays" are actually infected PCs. This problem is solved by turning off the ability of the average customer to connect outside the ISP on port 25. I know that people are going to scream about that, but as long as ISPs offer a simple "opt-in" (via telephone, preferably, for obvious reasons) for the ability to send, there really won't be anybody blocked if they don't want to be.

  237. Re:Totally OT: Chinese youth in Olympics by jacquesm · · Score: 1

    You are making a grave error in assuming the olympics is about sports. It's politics disguised as sports.

    The same goes for the Eurovision Song Festival.