The big cost of chipmaking is R&D, not per unit manufacturing, and the cloud won't reduce that by much. That's a one time cost that Intel has to pay no matter what, which is why it's in their best interest to try and extract as much money as they can from the technology they spent so much on developing.
No, his crime was like giving the company keycard to a bunch of vandals. That the anon guys didn't do serious damage is irrelevant, because they could have.
USB has become succesful because it was cheap and simple to use and cheap and simple to manufacture. It seems to me that USB-C is getting further and further away from that by the day. Maybe different use cases require different solutions, maybe there is no such thing as a 'one universal cable' that can combine the advantages of all the others without the disadvantages. It seems like USB just wanted to replace lightning on Apple stuff, and does not care about PC users who don't have a fortune to waste on a piece of wire. Which is not even just wire anymore, it contains its own electronics, losing all the elegance and simplicity tha made USB great.
The reason I liked Opera was because it allowed a rich browsing experience with great degree of costumisability and control natively, without needing to install 20 shitty javascript extensions that make a browser slow and unstable. A browser written entirely in shitty js is not a replacement for Opera.
Because this isn't a home automation device, this is an IoT device. And IoT works by connecting all your devices to the internet because the control logic is in the cloud. There is no technical reason to do so (it's not like you couldn't remote access a home based solution if you really wanted to turn the lights from somewhere else), but companies are heavily pushing it because it gives them control and data to mine. It also fits nicely into the "sharing economy" buzz.
I still own a Windows Mobile phone although I don't really use it anymore. Calling their new mobile OS Windows 10 Mobile just adds another layer of confusion beside skipping the 9.
So Apple complied with the requests in drug cases but started a big fight over a terrorist? Did they change their policy or is there a technical difference between the cases?
"This is a historic visit," Obama said as he greeted U.S. Embassy staff and their families at a Havana hotel. "It's an historic opportunity to engage with the Cuban people."
I'm happy I'm not the only one who has no idea which one is correct.
There are many kinds of random. The site chooses a photo without taking into account where it was taken, and because the density of photos varies greatly with location, even a simple statistical algorithm using no data from the images could get fairly accurate at guessing.
I don't know what the motivation for a homegrown CPU was, but if the goal was to build something secure with no foreign backdoors then using a foreign foundry defeats that.
The big cost of chipmaking is R&D, not per unit manufacturing, and the cloud won't reduce that by much. That's a one time cost that Intel has to pay no matter what, which is why it's in their best interest to try and extract as much money as they can from the technology they spent so much on developing.
If "the cloud" meant that costumers pay less, Intel wouldn't be switching to it.
Do you also watch movies fast forward?
When TTIP and TTP get finished the number of those countries will drop sharply.
No, his crime was like giving the company keycard to a bunch of vandals. That the anon guys didn't do serious damage is irrelevant, because they could have.
I'm guessing control systems on different airports need to communicate with each other directly.
USB has become succesful because it was cheap and simple to use and cheap and simple to manufacture. It seems to me that USB-C is getting further and further away from that by the day. Maybe different use cases require different solutions, maybe there is no such thing as a 'one universal cable' that can combine the advantages of all the others without the disadvantages. It seems like USB just wanted to replace lightning on Apple stuff, and does not care about PC users who don't have a fortune to waste on a piece of wire. Which is not even just wire anymore, it contains its own electronics, losing all the elegance and simplicity tha made USB great.
The reason I liked Opera was because it allowed a rich browsing experience with great degree of costumisability and control natively, without needing to install 20 shitty javascript extensions that make a browser slow and unstable. A browser written entirely in shitty js is not a replacement for Opera.
I guess they saw an opportunity with Thunderbird's future being as unsure as it is.
Because this isn't a home automation device, this is an IoT device. And IoT works by connecting all your devices to the internet because the control logic is in the cloud.
There is no technical reason to do so (it's not like you couldn't remote access a home based solution if you really wanted to turn the lights from somewhere else), but companies are heavily pushing it because it gives them control and data to mine. It also fits nicely into the "sharing economy" buzz.
I still own a Windows Mobile phone although I don't really use it anymore. Calling their new mobile OS Windows 10 Mobile just adds another layer of confusion beside skipping the 9.
Interesting.. So Apple was willing to get the data from the phone, they just don't want to tell how they did it? I guess that makes sense, in a way.
Sorry, I didn't see your post. Probably cuz it was at -1 :-P
So Apple complied with the requests in drug cases but started a big fight over a terrorist? Did they change their policy or is there a technical difference between the cases?
MS already has a bot framework, it's called XP.
Oh, not that sort of bot?
They should've used LibreOffice, of course.
No, your computer will already be in India and you will access it through the cloud.
And what does getting one man on their side achieve? It's not like researchers can just take home radioactive samples.
Quadros are professional grade cards for content creators, not consumers.
I'm happy I'm not the only one who has no idea which one is correct.
If there's money in it that's even better, means that more businesses will start recycling in the future.
Yep, this blog post sums it up pretty nicely.
Why is it better to force users to use https instead of letting them choose? I hate this modern trend when removing features is considered "progress".
There are many kinds of random. The site chooses a photo without taking into account where it was taken, and because the density of photos varies greatly with location, even a simple statistical algorithm using no data from the images could get fairly accurate at guessing.
I don't know what the motivation for a homegrown CPU was, but if the goal was to build something secure with no foreign backdoors then using a foreign foundry defeats that.