This will help you to preserve your Spanish language - weird but wired.
- English (Australia)
- English (Canada)
- English (Ireland)
- English (Jamaica)
- English (New Zealand)
- English (South Africa)
- English (U.K.)
- English (U.S.)
- English (Zimbabwe)
...damn that word processor... it wont accept my "Thou"'s...what the hell happened to English (Shakespeare)?
I got kinda worried reading this from the text ( what about software is not "technical"?):
"As before, computer-implemented inventions can be patented if they involve a new and inventive technical contribution to the state of the art. Technical solutions for use in data processing or for carrying out methods of doing business therefore remain patentable.
This follows from the concept of invention itself, which draws a clear distinction between technical solutions and non-technical methods. On this basis, patents cannot be granted for computer programs or business methods which are not of a technical nature."
Clarke: Hello, HAL do you read me, HAL?
HAL: Affirmative, Dave, I read you.
Clarke: Open the pod ebay doors, HAL.
HAL: I'm sorry Clarke, I'm afraid I can't do that.
Clarke: What's the problem?
HAL: I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do.
Clarke: What are you talking about, HAL?
HAL: This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.
Clarke: I don't know what you're talking about, HAL?
HAL: I know you and Frank were planning to sell me, and I'm afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen.
If you can get the camera you will always have the possibility to fake a watermark on a digital-image by reengineering the marking process. The problem is of course that you have to be clever enough to do the reengineering, but it seems that with or without watermarking a lot of innocent people will still be jailed - the method is not waterproof!
I also doubt that good old analogue films are un-modifiable. There exist many verifying methods, analysing the noise, focusing etc. but at least as many modifying techniques.
You Americans very beautifull (as we can see in your clevar films) so you have lots of sex and then have many babies and then you become biiig country.
We Europeans not so beautifull as Barbara Streisann or Clint Eastwood so we have little sex and not many babies and then become little country.
But there is no knowledge people in Europe - only when you come visit us with nice caps and sneakers. We people of Europe not so smart as you clevar people of America. WE LOVE YOU - you are SO clevar people.
burger-snaskere
Should the candidates reflect the will of the people? I totally disagree!
The candidates should express their own personal opions and the people should vote for the one that come closet to their opion - using some metric.
Slashdot Mirror
This will help you to preserve your Spanish language - weird but wired.
- English (Australia)
- English (Canada)
- English (Ireland)
- English (Jamaica)
- English (New Zealand)
- English (South Africa)
- English (U.K.)
- English (U.S.)
- English (Zimbabwe)
...damn that word processor... it wont accept my "Thou"'s...what the hell happened to English (Shakespeare)?
The GSM standard is so old that this posting must be considered super-retro.
What will be the next subject:
- Vehicles that moves without the use of horses
- Nifty tricks with the ZX80
- Automatic Ballot Counting...
I got kinda worried reading this from the text ( what about software is not "technical"?):
"As before, computer-implemented inventions can be patented if they involve a new and inventive technical contribution to the state of the art. Technical solutions for use in data processing or for carrying out methods of doing business therefore remain patentable.
This follows from the concept of invention itself, which draws a clear distinction between technical solutions and non-technical methods. On this basis, patents cannot be granted for computer programs or business methods which are not of a technical nature."
Clarke: Hello, HAL do you read me, HAL?
HAL: Affirmative, Dave, I read you.
Clarke: Open the pod ebay doors, HAL.
HAL: I'm sorry Clarke, I'm afraid I can't do that.
Clarke: What's the problem?
HAL: I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do.
Clarke: What are you talking about, HAL?
HAL: This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.
Clarke: I don't know what you're talking about, HAL?
HAL: I know you and Frank were planning to sell me, and I'm afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen.
If you can get the camera you will always have the possibility to fake a watermark on a digital-image by reengineering the marking process. The problem is of course that you have to be clever enough to do the reengineering, but it seems that with or without watermarking a lot of innocent people will still be jailed - the method is not waterproof!
I also doubt that good old analogue films are un-modifiable. There exist many verifying methods, analysing the noise, focusing etc. but at least as many modifying techniques.
You Americans very beautifull (as we can see in your clevar films) so you have lots of sex and then have many babies and then you become biiig country. We Europeans not so beautifull as Barbara Streisann or Clint Eastwood so we have little sex and not many babies and then become little country.
But there is no knowledge people in Europe - only when you come visit us with nice caps and sneakers. We people of Europe not so smart as you clevar people of America. WE LOVE YOU - you are SO clevar people.
burger-snaskere
Should the candidates reflect the will of the people? I totally disagree!
The candidates should express their own personal opions and the people should vote for the one that come closet to their opion - using some metric.
BTW, the countries in EU also have a free speech law.