Slashdot Mirror


User: RLiegh

RLiegh's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,767
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,767

  1. Re:Existing virtual machines? on VMWare Inc. Releases Free Virtual Machine Runtime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As far as I'm aware, there is nothing out there which can create (Bochs and Qemu can read) VMWare disk images, and they're more advanced than simple raw or dd-created files with filesystems slapped onto them.

  2. Gee, that's nice. on VMWare Inc. Releases Free Virtual Machine Runtime · · Score: 5, Interesting

    However, given the compatibility problems with previous versions of VMWare I am not sure how much use it will be to people who download Open Source VMs off of the web to run (and I assume that's part of who this is aimed at). I've read a couple of places, for instance, that the current version of VMWare won't run the VMWare installation of Plan 9 that you can download from Bell Labs.

    That said, you can run Qemu with kernel acceleration on Linux, FreeBSD (a platform VMWare doesn't even support) and 2000/XP and get pretty good performance - and it's probably a better option than a mere 'runtime' given that not only does it support an additional platform (FreeBSD), but you can create a VM on one platform and run it on all the others (even ones w/out accerlation, such as NetBSD -though you really would not want to).

  3. ITP I fix the typo from the parent post: on Homer Becomes Omar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let me ask you, in Saudi Arabia how likely is it to put forth atheistic and/or anti-muslim views and have them broadcast...and if, by some miracle you were able to; what would happen to you?

  4. Re:My karma can stand it on Homer Becomes Omar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In America, you can go on television and air criticisms of Republican, Christian or any other viewpoints; and you may get a debate or -at worse- a reprimand.

    Let me ask you, how likely is it to put forth atheistic and/or anti-muslim views and have them broadcast...and if, by some miracle you were able to; what would happen to you?

    Compare and contrast.

  5. Re:This is the first time... on Homer Becomes Omar · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our decadent western infidels, and would like to remind them that as a trusted cleric I could be useful in rounding up the faithful to toil in their underground filth mines.

  6. Ha! I'd like to see them try it! on Why Talk About Internet Governance? · · Score: 1

    (assuming, of course, that they let me join too >.>)

  7. Re:Well... on Estonian Internet Voting Called a Success · · Score: 1

    >...hopefully that blunt statement will minimize the "yeah but does it run..." comments - time will tell.

    I imagine they needed a beowulf cluster of linux machines for the election. Of course, it it was still Soviet Estonia, linux would have run on the election!

  8. Re:Isn't Estonia that "fake country" in Dilbert? on Estonian Internet Voting Called a Success · · Score: 4, Informative

    Estonia
    You're welcome.

  9. Rather "it works" when you're the winner on Estonian Internet Voting Called a Success · · Score: 0, Troll

    amirite?

  10. No shit? on Oracle and MySQL -- Good Move or Bad Bet? · · Score: 1

    No body else saw that coming. Anyways, how is that going to affect PostgreSQL (IE, will the lack of real competition from mysql help them, or not effect them at all?)

  11. ya sounds about right on Stopping Linux Desktop Adoption Sabotage · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that MS hasn't gotten either the GPL (or the concept of Open Source) legislated out of practice yet. After all, supposedly what's good for Business (and to most legislators MS==IT) is what's supposed to be good for america.

  12. Two words: We can't. on The Problems with Broadband in America · · Score: 1

    Either suck it up or move (ya right) to another country.

  13. Re:How can we change this? on The Problems with Broadband in America · · Score: 1

    You're wrong; neither consumers nor citizens have the power to effect change. Only corporations and PACs can do that.

  14. Hopefully on Office + OpenDocument, Never Say Never · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hopefully any government bodies which adopt OpenDocument will thoroughly test any suites they do purchase for compatibility (so that they aren't stuck creating 'open' documents which are only able to be opened by products from one company).
    However, given the corrupt and incompetent nature of governments, I'm very much not counting on it.

  15. Now that's what I call 'intelligent design'! on Dinosaur Forces Rethink Of Flight's Evolution · · Score: 3, Funny

    make a few throw away prototypes before marketing the real thing. Fooey to all those 'evolutionists' and their 'science', I say!

  16. Re:Simple answer on Space Tourism? · · Score: 1

    A geek or, more likely, a rich egomaniac who wants to be one of the few (500 afaik) people to venture out into space (regardless of qualifications).

  17. Space Tourism? on Space Tourism? · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What about it?

  18. Re:Try again on Google Hires Gaim's Main Developer · · Score: 1
    For one thing, there is no reason why the Gaim developer cannot continue work on Gaim while working for Google.

    depends on what his contract says, I imagine. Most employers have non compete clauses in their contracts, and GAIM would certainly qualify as a competitor to google talk.
  19. Um, this is supposed to be a GOOD thing? on Google Hires Gaim's Main Developer · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    So, Microsoft and AOL combine, which will doubtlessly have the effect of bringing about server changes which will shut out current GAIM users, and now their competitor (google also has a chat service) buys out the developer of the one decent OSS proggie which can connect reliably to the MSN/AOL servers?

    It looks to me as though Google wants to make sure their chat is the only one supported on *nix.

  20. Re:Answer on Bill Gates Is Coming To A College Near You · · Score: 1
    Not quite, this is one case where (because of its' community-edited nature) you have to take what wikipedia says with a large grain of salt. (though in my googling I found a discussion of this in a wiki talk page.)

    Regardless, here's the story
    The File Allocation Table (FAT) was designed and coded in Feb., 1976 by a kid named Bill Gates during a five day stay at the Hilton Hotel in Albuquerque. He developed it for a version of Basic that could store programs and data on floppy disks. The FAT design was incorporated by Tim Patterson in an early version of an operating system for the Intel 8086 chip. Gates bought the rights to the system, then rewrote it to create the first version of DOS. As a direct result, Gates is the richest man in America.

    And here is the source.

  21. Re:Answer on Bill Gates Is Coming To A College Near You · · Score: 2, Informative

    1)wrote or co-wrote one of the first mainstream implementations of BASIC
    2)created the FAT file sytem (originally for use with #1, a few years before Patterson's DOS.

  22. Re:How about... on Yahoo Closes Chat Rooms to Anyone Under 18 · · Score: 1

    Have you been on IRC lately? There's two types of rooms; ones made up of perpetual lurkers and ones made up of idiots flaming, powertripping and spouting (oftentimes literal) gibberish.

    These days IRC is like slashdot at a threshold of -1; except only half as intelligent.

  23. This is crap on Internet Power Struggle Reaching Climax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Basically it boils down to the fact that smaller nations want the right to filter and censor everything for everyone they find objectionable. Good riddance, let them go, I say.

  24. Re:Hurrah, Socaialism! on CND Government Demands Widespread Tap Access · · Score: 3, Funny
    Three cheers for big government and reduced citizens' rights! Hip-hip HUZZAH...


    Thank god I live in the US, where our government would never interfere with our privacy (or other) rights.
  25. Re:The POed Factor on Why Do You Block Ads? · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Whether you agree with my stance on certain commercials being vulgar/etc; you have to admit...

    I grew up during the free-wheeling 70's, and I pride myself on being less prudish and repressed than pretty much anyone I (currently) know. However, that said, I always wince whenever I'm eating dinner and a masingil ad comes on, or seeing an commercial for herpes while I'm watching a movie, and yeah I get offended over the Viagra ads too (mostly because of the shyster factor).

    This is all during the late afternoon, early evening; it's not a matter of being purient; it's a matter of being gross. I don't want to hear about herpes, diarrhea, yeast infections or impotence while I'm trying to relax.

    It's just fucking gross.