If I wanna do it for both ext3 and XFS (and in future JFS - but I don't care about it) so I think it'd be good to have some standard layer. IIRC Samba now left using XFS specific ACL interface and if possible uses Posix ACL which should work genericly for any fs with ACL support
Some of them can help administrator a lot (especially when managing large system you can by "WRITE_ACL" delegate rights to sub-admins, by "ADD_FILE" you can restrict some BFUs doing mess on your system etc.
READ_DATA Permission to read the data of the file LIST_DIRECTORY Permission to list the contents of a directory WRITE_DATA Permission to modify the file's data ADD_FILE Permission to add a new file to a directory APPEND_DATA Permission to append data to a file ADD_SUBDIRECTORY Permission to create a subdirectory to a directory READ_NAMED_ATTRS Permission to read the named attributes of a file WRITE_NAMED_ATTRS Permission to write the named attributes of a file EXECUTE Permission to execute a file DELETE_CHILD Permission to delete a file or directory within a directory READ_ATTRIBUTES The ability to read basic attributes (non-acls) of a file WRITE_ATTRIBUTES Permission to change basic attributes (non-acls) of a file
DELETE Permission to Delete the file READ_ACL Permission to Read the ACL WRITE_ACL Permission to Write the ACL WRITE_OWNER Permission to change the owner SYNCHRONIZE Permission to access file locally at the server with synchronous reads and writes
I was on Monday and Tuesday on SambaXP where Tridge had talk about Samba 4. Also we discussed possibility of having completely Windows-compatible (and NFS v4) compatible ACLs on standard fs like XFS and ext3. Result was that Samba team needs a kernel interface for this so I'm going to hire some summer students for this and I expect some working code on autumn.
Don't forget that Crusoe and Itanium are targeted for TOTALY different markets. Crusoe is intented for low-powered PDA/Tablet/Notebooks while Itanium is high-end-wanna-be.
Slashdot Mirror
...imagine beowulf... oh, nothing...
I wonder nobody didn't come out with this idea during .com boom :-) And I'd bet he'll be running a successful company now.
;-)
P.S.
Just imagine the load of shit at Microsoft HQ
Nope - you are completely wrong - it's not about gettin pr0n TO space but FROM space ;-)
You know - maybe it's not so perverted after all - if it can use framebuffer and somebody sometime will implement AA into FB... who knows...
Why not directly boot up Emacs? .-)
Does it support AA and alpha chanell? .-)
I'd suspect that you run out of memory when decompressing the RPM. Did you setup any swap?
Any screenshots?
If I wanna do it for both ext3 and XFS (and in future JFS - but I don't care about it) so I think it'd be good to have some standard layer. IIRC Samba now left using XFS specific ACL interface and if possible uses Posix ACL which should work genericly for any fs with ACL support
I think root won't take care of any ACLs ;)
Some of them can help administrator a lot (especially when managing large system you can by "WRITE_ACL" delegate rights to sub-admins, by "ADD_FILE" you can restrict some BFUs doing mess on your system etc.
No exactly. For example see NFS v4 ACLs:
READ_DATA Permission to read the data of the file
LIST_DIRECTORY Permission to list the contents of a
directory
WRITE_DATA Permission to modify the file's data
ADD_FILE Permission to add a new file to a
directory
APPEND_DATA Permission to append data to a file
ADD_SUBDIRECTORY Permission to create a subdirectory to a
directory
READ_NAMED_ATTRS Permission to read the named attributes
of a file
WRITE_NAMED_ATTRS Permission to write the named attributes
of a file
EXECUTE Permission to execute a file
DELETE_CHILD Permission to delete a file or directory
within a directory
READ_ATTRIBUTES The ability to read basic attributes
(non-acls) of a file
WRITE_ATTRIBUTES Permission to change basic attributes
(non-acls) of a file
DELETE Permission to Delete the file
READ_ACL Permission to Read the ACL
WRITE_ACL Permission to Write the ACL
WRITE_OWNER Permission to change the owner
SYNCHRONIZE Permission to access file locally at the
server with synchronous reads and writes
These are Posix ACL with clasical rwx attributes. Windows ACLs does have more ACL attributes.
I was on Monday and Tuesday on SambaXP where Tridge had talk about Samba 4. Also we discussed possibility of having completely Windows-compatible (and NFS v4) compatible ACLs on standard fs like XFS and ext3. Result was that Samba team needs a kernel interface for this so I'm going to hire some summer students for this and I expect some working code on autumn.
In another news on /. presenting "Penis enlargment for dummies" and "Howto get gold from Nigeria".
1. Found (space) elevator company
2. ???
3. Prosper!
I can imagine two ppl having two PC sitting face 2 face or whatever - this is much more effective then sharing one keyboard.
I think mainly very high accurance - WYSIWYK - What You See Is What You Kill - no wind, gravity etc., just immediate effect.
475 MB you surely don't need for your private data. You need this space for work - and you should get it.
I store ALL my emails for a long time. Our email server stores all data on RAID array so it's more secure that downloading them on local computer.
And about size - see usage of my mail boxes:
2.5M Drafts
33M Saved/Discobolos
16M Saved/Konvertory
62M Saved
205M Sent
192K SPAM
206M Trash
475M total
And that's all running through 10 Mbit network and it's quite fast.
Use IMAP. Thenafter you'll be able to share your mails not even between Windows and Linux but also you can easily access them using webmail.
What means "+2 cents contributed"? I've read this everywhere but couldn't find out the meaning of it.
What the fu** is "Kernel panic" and what is he doing with my B-52?
Don't forget that Crusoe and Itanium are targeted for TOTALY different markets. Crusoe is intented for low-powered PDA/Tablet/Notebooks while Itanium is high-end-wanna-be.
Lie, big lie, statistics...